WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2022 NFL MegaPod Week 18 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man, now down man. It is Thursday,

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>January six, two thousand two. Happy New Year, everybody, and

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for the first time ever, Week eight to the NFL,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>it is the Beating the book Megapod. Gil Alexander out today.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Palm, vice president of Operations for Circa

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and host of Odds On with them All Shaw on

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Visa Monday through Friday, two o'clock in the East, eleven

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>am in the West. Joining me regular panelist Todd Wish

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of Good Morning Todd, Good morning, Mr Mikey, thank you,

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and first time guest, longtime listener to the Megapod. Mr

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Frank Schwab is our guest this week. Frank is the

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>senior NFL writer for Yahoo Sports. They're betting analysts, a

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>regular guest on on Odds On and the Nuts, and

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and from time to time on a numbers game with Gil,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and one time NFL MVP voter. Good morning Frank, Yeah,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I got it in that once. Hey. Happy to be here.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I've listened to all the best of Guil. I've listened

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to his show for years and it is an honor

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to be on here with you guys and chop it

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>up for a Weekend. Okay, tell that story. What how

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>how are you one time an m v P voter

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and no longer an m VP. That's interesting. This was,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was. I can't even say it was

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>back when I had hair, because that that would like

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago. But I yeah, I got a shot

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>one time in two thousand nine, UH voted for Drew Brees.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>He was the right call for m VP. Peyton Manning

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>one instead. I'll die Toto Grave saying I made the

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>right boat there. I got one shot because one of

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>the it was a long story. One of the voters

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do it because the paper didn't allow it. But

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>my paper is like, sure, go for it. It was

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome. It was pretty awesome to be a part

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of that panel. Do you think, before we get into

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the format of the show, do you think, Frank, that

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>hub Arkish will have his rights revoked after this year?

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I do, I honestly do. I don't know how that well.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I've met him a couple of times, but it's just

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those things you can't come out and say

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I dislike this guy and I'm not gonna vote for

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>him for m VP because of it. You just can't

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's that's not that's not the spirit of

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>m VP. It's not I think that MVP should be

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>about so well, you know that maybe there was a

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>discussion somewhere in there about hey, Aaron Rodgers let his

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>team down by missing a game and blah blah blah.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>You can't come out and say it's the biggest jerk

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL and I won't like, you just can't.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's so yeah, I think the I think the panel there,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they at the Associated Press can have to look really

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>really hard at that. I also find it incredulous that

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers has never heard of hub arc Is though. Yeah, right,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>like Aaron Rodgers has rabbitters Man, he hears everything, he

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>knows everybody like, yeah, he's he's definitely, but he's an

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>absolute bum. I guess what what a great like old

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>school like the insult with a guy, you're a bumb

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh he's played for the Dodgers, Like that's great. So,

0:02:58.040 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as we normally do, we start to show off with

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>some survivor talk where it here it is the last

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>week of the year started out with close to fort

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>entrants and we are down to five. All five advanced

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>from last week. Three of the five are eligible for

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the million dollar bonus because they still have one of

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>last year's two Super Bowl teams available. Two of the

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>entries have Kansas City available, one entry has Tampa Bay available.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Now should they the three of them use it, and

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a great likelihood they'll all use those picks in

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City and Tampa Bay win. Let's just say all

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>five win. They would split the six million five ways,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>one point two million each, and then those three would

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>put the bonus state each get three hundred and thirty

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>three thousand. So the person sitting there with I think

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a scheduling advantage and survivor are those that have Kansas

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>City available. Since it's the first game on Saturday. If

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they win with Kansas City, the worst they can do

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is win one point five three million, and I think

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday they could then take the other three selections.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's say it's Tampa Bay, Tennessee and Washington football team

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and make a three team money line parlay and hope

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to lose because if one of them loses, your the

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>worst you did is just go from go up from

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one point to the one point five million. Thoughts on that, Todd, Oh,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were you were asking, Frank, I think

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously that that seems to be the way to how

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>much can they win? What's the ratio on the three

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>team money line parlay? Well, we'd have to we have

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to see what it what it would be. I mean

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, here's what I'm assuming. I'm assuming those three used.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>They use Kansas City, who's who's a ten point favorite

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half point favorite? And Tampa Bay who's

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this eight point favorite was a sixteen point favorite on

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the look Ahead. One of the two other Syracuse Hawkeyes

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>has the Titans available. They're also a ten and a

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite on the road against the Texans. And

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>then the other entry, Chris Piper, he doesn't have much left.

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.559
<v Speaker 1>The biggest favorite he has left is the Wolf tis

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the football team? UM, who are who are laying six

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>six and a half at the Giants? So if those

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>were the picks and the guys that took Kansas City

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>parlayed on the money line, uh, Tampa Bay, Tennessee and Washington.

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking right now at the odds. Washington's about to sixty.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The Titans are around UM five dollars and the Buccaneers

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>about three fifties. So you're looking at a three team

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>money line parlay. That's that you can put. Yeah yeah,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little less than that. We can do the

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>math here, but you could do that, or you can

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>bet the games individually. The thing is all of the

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>games go early, right, so they're all I think. So, No,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks is a game, so you can wait with that.

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>On the East, you could wait. You could do a

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>two team money line parlay in the first game, see

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>where you're at, and then decide what you want to

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>do on the Bucks. But what a great position to

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>be in for all these folks, um. Obviously four of

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>them advanced with Green Bay on Christmas Day and one

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>advanced with Tennessee on the Thursday before. That's how all

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of them got here. As we whittled it down, uh

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in that group from sixteen to nine and then from

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>from nine to five. Todd, you want to update everybody

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on the performance last week and where we stand with

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the records. Sure. Absolutely, the huge week by Mikey Mr

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Michael Palm going three and oh, a very very solid

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>week over fifty one in Cincinnati. The Chargers was a

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>no doubter, and the Bears, which was a no doubter,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>so you basically had three no doubter wins. You also

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>want your teaser to go to six and one on

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the regular spread and nine seven and one on the teaser.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Gil keeps the lead because he went twenty He went

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>two and one against uh the spread last week to

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>go to twenty six, and he had the Bengals Tennessee

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and almost got there with the wolf Tis they they

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he had plus three and a half. They lost by four.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>He lost his teaser though he is now eight eight

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and one on the teasers. Looks like I have the

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>teaser championship locked up. I went to in one last week. Also,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Jacks in New England was the only one that didn't

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>get there for me. Unfortunately, uh I. I knew the

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Jags weren't going to score more than seven to ten points. Unfortunately,

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots rolled up the score like they did against

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, and that was the one thing I was

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. And of course the Patriots did it again.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>So I went to and one to go to twenty

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>one and thirty. I am eleven and six on teasers

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>because I won my teaser pretty easily with Green Bay

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Charges, So that's where we are. You could

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>still catch Gil. I got all of guilds picks here.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>You could still catch Gil, especially because we're going through

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. You're only uh have one game back in

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the lost column. Yeah, one and a half overall, and

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the guests Will Hill had Bengals winner, Tennessee winner, Steelers winner,

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and Chargers uh in Seattle. So he went four and

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>all as well. So a great week for little Hill.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Who does that New York City podcast asked on visa

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a regular on the Lombardi line. Okay, Frank,

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the formatt are three best bets against the spread. You

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>can take a side or a total. It's based on

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the consensus number right now. Then a two point two

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>teams six point teaser, and then we'll ask a couple

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of questions to end the show off. You're the guests,

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so you have the honors this week, Frank. You know

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start off with all three of my picks

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to be about the same point spread range,

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and all of them are underdogs because I like the

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>underdogs of this final week because we've lines get inflated

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because we hear all the time of oh this team

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to play for. Well that's garbage. Most of

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the time they're out of playoff contention, but there's something

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>to play for. My first pickens, he laughed, Falcons to

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. Look, we all know by now

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the great NFL rivalries. It's underrated,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe not even underrated anymore. Falcons Saints is a huge

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>deal to those teams. And I think the Falcons, like

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other teams I like this, are going

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to want to knock the Saints out of playoff contention.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>We all know their scenario. The Saints wins, lose, the

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints are in and I think that that is push

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this line up a little bit. I don't trust the

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Saints offensive score a lot. Look, I was watching that

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Panthers game last week and I'm like, oh wow, it's

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>still you know, ten nine Panthers and I was twelve

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>ten Saints, and they just can't pull away from anybody.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>This is not a team. It's gonna put up a

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of points. I don't think Falcons are a good

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>team by any means, but I think that this is

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>their super Bowl. They put everything into this game. We

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 1>see we year after year final week of the season,

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>teams come out and even if they're not in playoff contention,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>under say we got one game left and we can

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>go golfing on Monday. Let's put it all on the

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>line here. Let's play hard. We see underdogs do pretty well.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>If if they've been game the season, they played pretty well,

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll take the Giants at all. But if a team

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Falcons who has played hard, they did play

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>hard at Buffalo last week, I think that the Falcons

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>give them all they can handle. I think they even

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have a shot to win here and give me four

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half home with them, I think they're gonna

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>be fired up. Falcons plus four and a half is

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>my first best pat here Todd couldn't. I couldn't agree

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>anymore with Frank Brother. I have that. I have that

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>circles my number four one. But and I think he's

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>saying something that we should warn everybody. UM in the

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>last two years, I think I just saw on Twitter

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>teams that need to win in the last two weeks

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>versus teams that have nothing to play for, the teams

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that have nothing to play for against the spread, something

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to that, something to that range. So UM, if you're

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a novice at sports gambling and you think you're going

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to win because you're going to take the team that

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has to win, be very careful. That is not a

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>good strategy, Todd, Can you read gils first pick and

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>then give your own Yes, gills first pick is the

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners plus four and a half. It was another

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>one that I kind of liked. I'm gonna assume he's

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>banking on the fact that Niners have really dominated the

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Rams uh in the last couple of meetings. I think

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>they've won the last five or six straight. Um. I

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of agree with that pick too. I like the Niners,

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>especially if Jimmy She's gonna play Jimmy g always scares me.

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But I am not a fan of the Rams. I

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 1>think the Rams are shaky. Look at last week, they

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>barely squeaked by. They're just not Matt Stafford. You know,

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>he is a tremendous talent, but he is not a

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>guy you feel comfortable with when you absolutely need it.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's my feeling, and that's probably what Gil's thinking

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to here, and he has Niners plus four and a half.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you guys think about that one.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely that's gonna be a mess. I could play because look,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>even if it's tray lads, tray lads, he started slow

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>last week and then he really heated up, and he

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>can make some play. Look that, throw a Deebo Samuel

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and touchdown. I'm sure Kyle Shanahan looks at that a

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>film and goes, my main quarterback can't do that. Like

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I can open up the playbook when I got this

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>rookie in there and the forty. The Rams most of

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>this season been front runners. They beat bad teams, but

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>against good teams they're not great that you know. We

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>saw last week they almost lost to a depleted Ravens team.

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust this Rams team really and the four

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>be Niners, but now we know they need to win.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They need to win. If they don't win, their their

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>faith is in the Saints hands to make the playoffs.

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's a playoff game for the Niners. I think

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we get everything. I mean, I think they win. I

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>really do. I think that they're gonna go in there.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We notice Shannaham mcbathing, so yeah, definitely agree. I think

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's real important that Jimmy g plays rather than the lance.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I was not impressed with Lance at all. Um. I

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>actually had a bet on in game bet on that

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>game on the team total under, on the type of

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. I thought Lance was against a really bad team.

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was and he may end up being good,

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but he did not impress me at all. He hasn't

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>impressed me all season. But you know, like you said,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we're probably gonna get Jimmy G anyway, so that it's

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>not you wouldn't be as Frank. Let's put it this way,

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>if Lance was playing, you'd be a little more concerned,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>especially because the Rams defense is pretty good, and I

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>might be as well. I think a little more variance

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But I look, you said that I was

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>watching at first half say woa, Trey, Lance can't do this,

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And then the second half he did play well. I'll

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>give him credit. He made some plays. I think he

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>got really comfortable, and we saw that in the game

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>where Jimmy G went out. I can't remember who they

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>were playing. It was early in the season before he

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>started against Arizona and Trey. The same thing kind of

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>happened first couple of series. He's shaky and then he

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>really warms up, and I just think that's a young kid.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, definitely more various for Trey. But I feel

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>fine either way, quarterback. I really you're right, Jimmy has

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>played a lot better people given credit for. But I

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>feel good either way. Quarterback. I think you're referring to

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks game in San Francisco. Seahawks. Yeah, yep, yeah,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't remember who their pone was, but yeah, it

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of those where you're like a few series

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, Trey Lands is in trouble and then

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>he got a hot light in the game, and the

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing happen against Huston. I'm I'm more with Todd

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>than you about Lance. I mean, the first half of

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that game last week was an under in game Underbetter's

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Dream between Trey Lance and and Alec Mills. Uh. Davis

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Mills Uh, I mean Todd I had it under seventeen

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half, sixteen and a half, fourteen and a half,

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and a half, and ten and a half. I mean,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>it's just who could punt quicker? I mean it was.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It was unbelievable. So I'm gonna have a play on

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this game as well, but it won't be the same one. Okay, Todd,

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your first pick, my first pick. I am gonna go

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>with the I'm gonna go with the over in the

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>l A Chargers game. Um, I think. I think the

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are just one of those beautiful over teams where

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they're tremendous on offense. We all see the Herbert and

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the whole story with him. I think obviously, if

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not a star already, he's a future star and

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be in, you know, top three quarterbacks in

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the league for time to come. I think the Chargers

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are outstanding offensively, and I think they're horrendous defensively. Uh.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that gave them the blowout last because

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they happened to be going against Drew Locke, who is

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>not ready for prime time. So I don't I don't think.

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I took the over last week,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it's still got there because the Chargers scored so much.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Raiders are the Raiders are pretty good

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>on it. I mean, I'm not gonna say they're their

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>their world beaters, but you don't have to be a

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>world beater to beat the Charge. Remember, the Steelers scored

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty four points against this team. The Steelers can't score

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty four points against anyone. I mean, I just keep

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going back to game after game after game where the

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Chargers look horrendous on on the defensive side of the ball.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And anybody remember the Browns game where guys were running

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like it was a college game. It was ridiculous. I

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Chargers can stop anyone, and I think

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that they can score on anyone. So I'm gonna take

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>over forty nine and a half in the Charges against

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the Vegas Raiders. You know, nothing says more about the

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Chargers defense than the fact that they scored with fourteen

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>seconds left and a half and Drew Lock was able

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to get a field goal for half. I mean, it's

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible. It is incredible. That's the standalone game on

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. Raiders Chargers winning. You're in uh should be

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a great atmosphere and ticket prices are going through the

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>roof here at Allegiance in Las Vegas. All right, I'm

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna taked. This is your first pick. First, my first pick.

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the number you have on the Cowboys and Eagles?

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I have six. Oh, it's going even lower. I had

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>six and a half a second ago. And now it

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like five and a half. Yeah, I think there

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was just news about something. Yeah, Parsons and Tyron Smith. Yeah,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take whatever this number is, six or whatever

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to give me here. I'm taking say it's

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>actually five and a half, but it's not going to

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>make a difference. I'm taking the Eagles here, Todd, because

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either team has anything to play for.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really, Dallas, what's the reality here that they

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>can play their way up. They don't own any tiebreaker.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't own any tiebreaker with Tampa Bay because they

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>lost that opening night game. There. The Rams playing for

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot, as you said, with the forty Niners. I mean,

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are playing for the two seed. Really, the

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>two are possibly the five fars owners should win and

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they lose to the forty Niners. So I mean, I

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think Dallas is pretty much locked into the four and

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>knows their faith. They're gonna have to win a game

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at home and then probably go to Lambeau and not

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's the worst thing. Maybe winning the game at

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>home is that is the bigger problem. I think of

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>all the NFC teams, Dallas might actually have the best

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>shot to go into Lambeau and win that game. I

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think they risk playing anybody if they're they're starters. Start,

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they may go a quarter, a quarter and a half.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>We know Philadelphia is not. They're locked. They're into a

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>playoffs scenario. They're going to be a wild card already. Um.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I really think this is just a glorified scrimmage with

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>either team making sure nobody gets hurt. And I'll take

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the home team getting more than a field goal in

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that spot. I have that circle does my second picks,

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and I might have to switch that one. But I

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>actually like that too. I mean, it's ridiculous. Who are

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys? Right? Who are the Cowboys to be giving

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>them that many points on the road in a in

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a glorified scrimmage? What are you gonna say? Frank Football

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Outsiders has that the Cowboys get the four seeds, So

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty much. The only think I'll push back on, though,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is I remember that came again some Giants a few years.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a Giants when they made no

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>sense for the Cowboys to play their guys and they

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>played him the whole freaking game. And you can say, well,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a different coach, it doesn't matter. Jerry Jones called

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>shots there. So I wonder if they are going to

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>play their starters a whole game. I don't agree with it.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's dumb. But it's the Cowboys that dumbly

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, so maybe they do it

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>dumbly this time too. But even with their starters, are

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they so great that they're gonna kills? I get that

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no motivation there, there's no and then he goes

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>about playing well, like, look, I get next seriality a

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of credit. I wondered if a couple of months

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of the season, I was like, this guy might be

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a donkey, but he actually has turned that thing around.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And how about Hurts? How about Hurts? This guy might

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>actually be good. I remember thinking this guy is horrendous

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and he actually looks I really think as far as

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>improvement goes, I don't know if you guys agree with

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>me on this. I think he's improved. I can't think

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of any quarterback who has improved more than Jalen Hurts

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. I don't know what you guys think, but

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, he really looks a lot better. Yeah,

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>he's good, is really good if you just put out

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 1>in a good tape of him, it's like, WHOA, this

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>guy is something. Then you put on the bad tape,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, like no, no, don't about this. So

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you just got to get that in the inconsistency out

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of his game. But the good is really really good

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>if you I'll give you guys this question. If you

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>owned an NFL franchise, and I gave you the choice

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of these four, which one would you want going into

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>next year? Is your quarterbacks? You like this, You're ready,

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>You're ready. Jalen Hurts to Taga Violoa him, Mac Jones,

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Young. I gave you all four Alabama quarter the

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>last four Alabama quarterbacks? Who do you want? And I know,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Young, you're only one year in college. But who

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>who would you have the rights to heading into next year?

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>M hmm. That's a good price for me, just because

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the upside, because I know what the other guys are

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and Hurts might be good, but I know the other

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>two guys are great. I don't know if Hurts is

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>ever gonna be great. I just root for the unknown.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>They're looking for the I mean, the obvious answer that

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone would say was Mac Jones, but I think, see,

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of Mac Jones being good. Is

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick really Daniels great offensive quarter Well, yeah, I

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>mean the Patriots. I mean the Patriots large. The Patriots

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>organization writ large has decided we are going to protect

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones and make him give him the opportunity to

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>succeed with the least amount of risk possible. I don't know,

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe that's a controversial opinion, but to me,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems very clear their first step in every game

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is we're going to run the ball, run the ball,

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, and try to protect Matt Jones. Do

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you agree with that, Mikey or do you think that's crazy?

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. And I wonder if these other

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterbacks that haven't been as successful, how they would

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have done if they landed in New England. How would

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance have done if he landed in much better?

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>How would much better Trevor Lawrence done if he landed

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in New England? Right? Yeah, you put Matt Jones. Put

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt Jones on the Jaguars. What happens? People would be screaming.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>People would be screaming. Matt Jones is the worst quarterback

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the NFL. You know, they would

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>be saying that he probably would have been injured by

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>now exactly. Yeah, but I would out of those guys,

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I would probably take just talent, just a loan of

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen. I'm gonna say something crazy. Hurts is

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>impressing me. I'll take Hurts. And the thing about Hurts

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is he can make you hurt with his legs and

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and if he gets the throws down, which he's starting

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to get down, and he gets the reads down, look

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>out because he has that extra ability that not everybody has. Now,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's going to be like a Calling Kaepernick who

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>had the that one year when he was amazing and

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden he fell apart. You know

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>he I can't. I can't. I can remember Kaepernick on

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>third and eight in huge games, like making those first

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>down runs, and it seems like Hurts can do the

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>similar thing. But well, we'll see. Obviously, I was listening

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to an interview with Rod Jaworski a couple of weeks ago,

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and he was really lavishing the praise on Hurt, staying

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the best natural leaders of a young

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>man to come into the league in many many years,

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's really high on Hurts and doesn't and think

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it should be a question if they're playing Minshew or Hurts,

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly Hurts just the number one there. Okay, Frank

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>gave his second pick already h with the Niners. Nay,

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So Todd, can you read gil second pick and give

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>your second Yes. Gil's second pick is the Woofties minus

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. I'm just gonna guess that Gil

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>thinks the Giants have packed it in. How can you

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>really argue against that? It seems to me that that

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the Giants have decided that the season is over and

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they're already on vacation. Uh. Some teams, you know, one

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>there's always one or two teams that have really checked

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>out for the season, and it certainly looks like the Giants,

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.959
<v Speaker 1>certainly on the offensive side of the ball, have completely

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>decided to check out. Not that woof he is any good,

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's only six and a half. I don't know

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what you guys think. I think Frank, you you already

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>told us you thought the Giants were done. I mean

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>last week I was. I don't think people are talking

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>about this enough. Last week, in the first half against Chicago.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>The New York Giants ran the ball twenty three times,

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>have passed twice, and they were down a half. That's

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Joe Judge give up. That is JoJo's quitting on his

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>team and saying, you're gonna give me this crappy roster.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>What here you go. I'm gonna run the clock out

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>on the first half and we're just gonna take our

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>l and go back to New York. I thought it

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was shameful. I thought that the game plan they had

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>last week was literally shameful. I thought he quit on

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>his team. And he's got these bizarre rants after the game,

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about guys calling him up multiple tized of weeks

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that you wish told stay there and blood. I think

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he's losing his mind. I think he's given up on

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this team. I think this team is pretty much given

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>up on him and his talent. Wise. I got I mean,

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I get it. My punt stinks like it. It's hard

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch that team. I totally agree. I think I

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think washing WFD just totally gets over on them, and

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and just and and also if you needed anything else,

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>George Judge colleg Washington a clown show organization, Roberver is

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring that up. He's gonna be anything you can

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>get from motivation the last week. He's gonna bring this

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff up. And so I think Washington at least trying,

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Giants are so yeah, Belly, what about Sat

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Barkley? How good would say Kwan Barkley? Beyond Sat Tennessee?

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Would he run for Derrick Henry numbers? No, nope. I

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>look whenever I watch those Giants games, and I watch

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>him every week. Obviously, Davante Parker looks like the more

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>explosive running back. It's kind of sad. I don't know

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>if if Sake Kwan needs another year. I don't know if,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>but every time I look up, it's like se might

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not even be the Giants best right, Like it's it's

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>hard to watch. I hope says back has got right now.

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. How about the original Sake one? How

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>about the original Sake one before the injury? Oh yeah, yeah,

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>he was unbelievable. Yeah the rookie, you're say, Kwan and

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Penn State say all day, I mean he I don't

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>know if he'd be Derrick Henry level or Jonathan Taylor level,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but he'd be in that. He not oper for sure.

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I just feel some of these running backs they lose

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>their careers because they're on the wrong team. I see

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it happening to Naja Harris because I think Naja Harris

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is a real talent. And uh, even though he broke

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>my heart last week when I had both team total

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Steelers under twenty one and a half and the Browns

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>plus seven and a half. And well, by the way, Mikey,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>tell me, what are the percentages of NFL teams breaking

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown run with one nineteen to go and they're

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just running it into the line? Does it happen more

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>than one out of a hundred? It probably does not

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>anymore because they're all trained to go down at the five.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna go down and then he's like, no, screw,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>there's like free runoff had all year. I'll take a touchdown,

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way. Even besides without that though, and we

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>know they all do know that they have to jump

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>out go down at the five, but even without that,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they almost never break a long one. Like I remember

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that Chub one a couple of years ago, but you

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>don't really remember. It's not like college. You know, in

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>college It happens all the time. We see it in

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL earlier this year, and Jonathan Taylor did against

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. You're college, if they get past the linebackers,

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they can't run them down. But in the pros there's

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>always dbs that are gonna run them down. They don't

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>break it, and I couldn't. I was driving home from

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the game because we had already left trying to beat

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the big Bend traffic, and we thought we had it

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>when when we got the back door touchdown by Baker

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>after a fourth and fifth team pass interference, we thought,

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, we're gonna get the back door and

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get the team total under And then they

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>give it to Najy and he's running free and I'm like,

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be kidding me. Naji, fall down, fall down.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You can't blame him. Though he's gonna get three on

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>my light of privilege every play, he's like, oh my god,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>this is what open field. That's why I brought it

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>up because I feel like he's gonna his career is

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>being ruined already with the team with no offensive lines.

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's hard. It's yeah. He has had a season like

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I have I haven't seen him have one easy run

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>all year except that one against He makes four yard

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>runs that are spectacular. Sometimes you know, makes like five,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible. So anyways, Mikey, are we up to me

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>your second? My second pick? I had Philadelphia written down here,

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna pass that for now. I'm gonna take

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. Do you have the Titans minus ten? Is

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have the Titans that? Yeah, Okay, I'm gonna

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>take the Titans minus ten. Um. I've watched a lot

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of Uston this year, and of course I watched all

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the games that I'm saying as far as games that

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I really pay attention to just because I'm always seemed

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to be on their team total under And last week

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I think I had the Niners and millions. By the

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>way I'm gonna be, I'm forty nine and thirty six

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and millions and going nowhere. Right, There's no way I

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>can catch even if you're gonna be like you're gonna

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>go five and O and be four games out of

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the money. Unbelievable. Okay, So anyways, last week I had Todd.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the last person that's in the money is

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty five and thirty and they're and they're in a

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty way tie for that, you know what I mean.

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm mathematically eliminated, of course. But anyways, so last

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>week I had the Niners and I had Lances watching

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that nonsense in the first half, and I'm thinking there's

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>no way, and then they get there in the second

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>half just because Houston's horrendous. I mean, do we really

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have to go over why Houston is bad? I mean,

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they have no quarterback, they have no nothing. It's it's

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a joke of a team. And they and I think

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they're still trying. That's the thing. I think the Titans

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>are still trying. They looked like they were trying against

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners. They just can't do anything. They're just

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not good enough. And I think the Titans, you know,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Vrabel is a serious coach. I've always liked Rabel and

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>they I think they need to win it for the

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for the one, number one overall seed. I think they're

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna be serious, and I think they're just gonna go

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in there and just plow through them, just run the

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>ball right through them, and it will be you know, Titans,

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a typical Titans game. Uh, you know, I

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>mean the typical Houston Texans game where it's like twenty

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>four to seven or twenty seven to seven, give me

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the Titans minus the ten. It was real quick. Why

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what I look at these Coach of the year odds.

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Can somebody explain to me what Zach Taylor's How do

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>my fable? What I mean? Mike f Abel is gonna

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>get the one seed without Derrick Henry being there half

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the year, without a j Brown being there for a

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>one or so, with Julio Jones being a corpse like

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Zach Taylor I had because like the Bengals were to

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>one to win their division, I think who cares? It's

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>always miss Price before the season. Maybe, like recently, I

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hate coaching. I hate so much. I was just gonna

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ask you guys this question. Who you would have to me,

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's only Zach Taylor Mike Vrabel that should voted for.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I think La Fleur no, because look, he was exposed

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City when Rogers didn't play, they couldn't do anything.

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not about him, that the Green Bay Matt. It's

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not the coach, is he the Matt? La Fleur? The

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Rogers is the coach but the floor is not the

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>real coach. Push back on that. I pushed that. Look

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>look at my McCarthy's last few years versus Matt Lafleur

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>winning of his games last three, I vote four. I

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>would I think at some point you just need to say,

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.719
<v Speaker 1>well whatever like that, this guy's gonna get the one

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>seed in the NFC, has done great job. Well you

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>know you O you Google, Oh you're saying la Fleur

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>should get even over for Abul and Zach Taylor. Yes, yes,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I I think I just think cook of the Year

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>as a stupid award. Josh Passers when acc Basketball Coach

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Year before mitro Chef's like, I mean, it's

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a dumb award. But I think at some point results

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just need to matter, and the Packers have been the

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>best team, so why not be great? And I wouldn't

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>even have a problem with anybody voting for him. But

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think when it comes down to is the Packers

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have been the best team. And la Flora's dealt with

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some things now, like Aaron Rodgers drama. He handled that

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>really well. Vante Adams drama, He's handled it. They lost

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Sire Alexander, they lost David Boccieri, they lost Darius Smith.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not like they've had no adversity. I vote La

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Flora because I think that's not just Aaron Rodgers and

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>roll the balls. I'll look at that win at Arizona

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and nobody and they won that game. So I think

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Flora's done a fine job, and I vote for You

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can't go to the NFC Championship every game year and

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>lose and be considered a winner by America. It's not

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, asked Danny White. Okay, unless you become the greatest.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Unless you become Jim Kelly, asked Jim Kelly. Well, he

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>won the conference, he didn't win the Super The only

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>exception is if La Fleur becomes the greatest color commentator

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the NFL, then it was okay

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>for madd And to lose seven a f C Championship games,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but not I think I vote it's not even not

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>even close. And and the Zach Taylor do Zach Taylor

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth down nonsense that he did it against Minnesota in

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Week one. And then why you won't kick a field

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>goal with forty eight seconds left in Kansas City doesn't

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have a time out, He got so lucky twice there. Well,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think you've got to think, what's the

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>other side of what he's thinking. He's thinking, if he

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>kicks the field goal, he's up by three with forty

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>eight seconds and no time outs, and for sure, Kansas

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get field he's thinking, I don't think. I'm

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>not saying I'm not saying it's for sure. I'm just

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that's what he's thinking. So he's thinking, we've got

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to win this game right here. Otherwise, and by the way,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you could do the percentages out there's probably what is

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the actual percentage of Kansas City getting a field goal

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>with forty eight seconds and no time outs? What's the

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>percentage I'd say less? Well, if he had tried the

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>short field goal and missed it, then it would have

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>been eight seven percent they scored a touchdown. Well, that's

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>only because we don't that's a whole another story. But seriously,

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what is it you think it's less than really no

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>time out? Pretty good? Bucker is a great kicker, I said.

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>If that's Aaron Rodgers in the same spot, though, I

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>think Rogers and Brady better at managing the clock that

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes though. Okay, I think it's pretty it's higher than

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys are giving it credit for, but obviously there's

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>no way to know. Okay, I'm gonna go to the

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>game that that that you that Gil and Frank already took,

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna play it a different way. What do

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you have as the total on the Rams game? Ram

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Rams against the Niners? The Rams against the Niners are

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>four and a half and forty four and a half

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>going under their Todd is my second pick under forty

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.959
<v Speaker 1>four and a half? Under forty four and a half. Okay,

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's Lance, then you won. I think I win.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>If it's Garoppolo, it depends on is a good Jimmy

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>g or bad Jimmy? Look at this is a playoff game.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It's the two versus the five seed for the Rams,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's to win and get in for the forty forty

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Niners and Shanahan have owned McVeigh. Okay, their devas have

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>been very good. You saw it, even with the change

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to Stafford at quarterback in the first meeting. San Francisco

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was dominant in that game. I think this is a

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>low scoring game, a playoff type atmosphere that both teams

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>will play conservatively and try not to beat themselves. Stafford

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>tried to give away that game in Baltimore last week,

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a pick six and a fumble in the red zone.

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's how good the Rams defense is, though,

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that they could still win a game like that that

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore was desperate to win. I think this game is

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventeen. I'm not sure which way, but I like

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it under I think if Lands goes, you can just

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>catch the ticket right now because you know they're going

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to protect him. They're gonna try to run the ball

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and shorten the game. But with Jimmy g

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it could be a whole another story. What do you think, Frank, Yeah,

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I do think you guys hate on Lance

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>too much. This guy's got some skills. Man, I didn't

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>see Wait, Frank, I didn't say he might here, Frank,

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say he wouldn't be good in the future.

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I just said right now, sure, I get it, I

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>get it, but you've seen some things on it. Well,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>let's see him. Let's see see like look back and

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the second half last week. Let's see him

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>against the real NFL defense. Though, we really haven't seen it.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, whatever he does against Montana State and the

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Texans is one thing. Let's see him go against this Rams,

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 1>this Rams defense. Okay, Frank, it's how many games, Mikey?

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>How many I remember the Seattle game? Didn't he play

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>another game where he was horrendous? Also he played he

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>played against Arizona and they just ran the ball, ran

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball, ran the ball. Remember, it was not a

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>good game. Play was not a good Yes, yes exactly,

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I had that game. But I think I think Shanahan

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>screwed that game up. But I think he did admit it.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he did admit I had a gag. Okay, Frank,

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's time for your third pick. I'm gonna go with

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers plus five and a half because you

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>know I talk I said this before by the Cowboys.

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Who are the Ravens to be giving five and a

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>half right now? They've been terrible lately, They're beat up.

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I love Horrorba, I love the infrastructure of that team,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but they've lost five in a row, including one of

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. And we know when the Steelers are right now,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get a great at the game. Ugly they're

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep a little scoring, and I think five and

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a half is way too much here. I really don't

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>understand the angle of well, they just left it all

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the field last week because Ben's last game quarterback.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Who canna be wrong? But he's not exactly from reputation

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and I know this is a lot of narratives street,

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>he's not exactly the guy in that locker room who

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 1>everybody just loves unconditionally, like he's the quarterbacks back, come

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. Respect him. But it's not like everybody at

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers was like, well, let's win this one

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 1>for Benn, and who cares if we make the playoffs?

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Like no, no, Like the Pittsburgh Steelers are gonna come

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>out in this and they don't other chances of making

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs pretty low. Yes, but you're still gonna play

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it out. He still gonna act like, hey, let's win

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens with the Colts. I think the

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers a stuffort we can out of them. We

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>know they're gonna play defense. We don't t J. Watt

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is a beast. He's gonna win DEFENSI Player of the Year.

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh so I think this is this line was just

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>totally It's surprised. It surprised me that the raven that

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers were so far well against this Ravens team

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that has shown really honestly nothing for five or more weeks.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Can I say something about the Picksburgh Stollers, Todd, I'd

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like you to say something, and then I'd also like

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you do um enveloping your comments, your partying thoughts on

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>what Big Ben has meant to you as a younser. Well,

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say it right now. The Picksburgh stores are.

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>We were in love with Big Ben, Rotha Burger and

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that and uh, look sure there were some issues early on,

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe some mistakes made off the field that don't seem

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to be exactly what a good person might be doing

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and at but we got over that. He became a

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>family man and we love Ben roethlis Burger, Big Ben.

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me just say I just want to say something.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to give a shout out to the sweet

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>people down at the hines Field because somebody took me

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to the suite against the Brownies and wow, what a spread.

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And I am obviously struggling. Now I'll go out of

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh e's for a minute. I'm obviously struggling with the

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>food right now, and it did not help at all

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>to be in that box because they had every kind

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of food available. It was unbelievable. The only bad part

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about that whole night was that Nagy Harris run on me.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But no, Big Ben Roethlisberger. I mean, how can you

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>look obviously, my friend. When we drove home, we had

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>a whole discussion about the the mistakes that Ben has

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>made in the past, and that was an interesting discussion.

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>But just as a football player, I think he's been amazing. Obviously,

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Super Bowl winner. Uh he was never good

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>enough to get us past Brady, but he was, Uh

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>he was. I mean, come on, how can the Steelers

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>get Terry Bradshaw and Ben Rothsburger all in the last

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>forty years. I mean, it's a tremendous thing to have

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback for that long. I mean it's almost like

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Rogers and Farve Tody got Tommy Maddox and you had

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark Malone and I mean just a lot of malicious

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>keeps going on and on. What about Charlie Charlie Badge

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for I mean, they've had they've had break we had

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>some lean years. I remember Mark Loan was the quarterback

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and we couldn't score a touchdown for like four games

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Oh my, and Mark Malone was the

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>local TV sports guy afterwards, Oh my gosh, he was horrendous.

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Mark Malone. Well, no, Donald took it to a super Bowl,

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at least, I mean it was Donald. He was decent,

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 1>just good enough, but not good enough to beat the

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>bootleggers Son and the Super Bowl and get get get

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Bury a championship. But as far as as far as

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>franchises go, to have both Terry Bradshaw and Ben Roethlisberger,

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good. I mean, how many other teams can

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>say they had too Hall of Fame quarter x And

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos John and Peyton was about looking seventy years

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for a quarterback. I mean, yeah, they get to the

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>eyes like that, back to back or not back to back,

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but in the same lifetime. Basically, Yeah, that's unbelievable. Well,

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners had Montana and Young back to back

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>for God's sakes, Well that was yeah, that was too

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 1>much over the slappy like Jeff Garcia was okay too,

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:27.439
<v Speaker 1>They've had a nice Jeff Garcia would have been okay

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>if not for Terrell Owens and what he did to

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>destroy Jeff Carcia. I think I really believe that, Todd.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It's time to read Gil's second pick or third pick. Sorry.

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Gil's third pick is the l A Chargers minus the three. Um.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Not positive why he likes this other than I know

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>he likes their coach a lot um. We've talked about

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the analytics to add nauseum. All I'll say is just

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>because it goes over three doesn't mean anything. Guys, but

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers minus three. I I assumed he likes it

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know he likes the coach matchup. Maybe okay, Todd,

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>time for your third pick. My third pick, I have

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Eagles circled here, but you took Eagles, So I'm just

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to see if I got on the fly come

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:16.479
<v Speaker 1>up with something different. Um than that, I don't really

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>see anything. I uh, you know what, I'm gonna go

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>with the Falcons. I kind of like I like what

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Frank had to say about the Falcons and the only thing,

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, forget that. I can't. I can't bet

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>on Maddy Ice. I'm just gonna take the Eagles. Forget

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it Philadelphia Philly plus five and half. I I just

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I just had a flashback, Frank, to all the bets

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:38.439
<v Speaker 1>that I've made on Maddie Ice, and I just feel

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>so horrible in the last two minutes when he's at

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the thirty two yard line in field goal range and

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>takes a sack to put him out of range. And

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I and I had last year, I had a thing

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>where I camp it. I went to Philly Rivers anonymous,

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and I decided I would no longer bet on Phil Rivers,

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and I am no longer betting on Maddie Ice. So

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stay. I'm gonna go with Philly plus five

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and a half for the same reasons, Mike, you said,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.280
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I don't think that the cowboy should

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>be favored by five and a half on the road

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>against the decent team. I really like what Hurts has done.

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>We talked to add nauseum about that. I'm just gonna

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>take Philly plus five and a half. Okay, then we

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>need your third Mikey. I'm taking the Chiefs Chiefs, and

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 1>let's see what the number is here, ten Chiefs minus ten. Yeah,

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the consensus number. Is that because the guy with

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Survivor told you it was a lock. No, I think

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it's because. I think it's because you know, Denver has

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.240
<v Speaker 1>really faced all these COVID issues. I think they've packed

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it in. I'm not sure if all of the city

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>will turn out to the last salute to the Commodore Fangio,

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>his last game in Denver. This team is really bad. Um.

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They were serviceable with Bridgewater, they were competitive in games.

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>They are not anymore, and I think they're just devastated. Look,

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City doesn't want to look. Kansas City loses the

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>tiebreaker with all the other a f C Conference winners.

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They've lost to all of them. They lost to the Bills,

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they lost to the to the Bengals, uh, and they

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>lost horribly to the Titans in Nashville. So they if

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>they lose their risk falling to the four or even

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the three, that means you don't get a second home game.

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>They'd at least like to get two games at Arrowhead

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe if somebody, if the Bagels could upset the

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Titans or something like that, they could have the a

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>f C Championship game and Arrowhead for the fourth straight season.

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>An accomplishment zone It means something to Kansas City here,

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it means to Denver. I don't

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>know how many people they're even gonna have, how many

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>bodies they're gonna have available. They certainly don't have a quarterback.

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll lay the points down the road here in a game,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>um that's fairly important to the Chiefs. Let me ask

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you this, how stunned were you guys when I had

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the over team total thirty eight and a half on

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. They had twenty eight at the half and

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>they scored three points in the second half. Can somebody

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>tell me how that happened? How did I just have

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a ball? They they I think they went pun punt

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>field goal their last three the only three possessions of

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the second half. That's correct, By the way, Mike, I'll

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>push back a little bit just because I think this

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>lines have played it. I think that the Broncos on

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night a couple of weeks ago, and I get

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it was Bridgewater and they have had COVID issues, but

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago that felt like I had the

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Bronco's neck, and that felt like a right side because

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos played with them, and there was a there

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 1>was a defensive touchdown and all that, but I didn't

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like the Broncos got run off the field. What

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are we saying in this game? If if it's plus

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>ten at Deenver, that what it would be fourteen and

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a half of Kansas City. I get it's just wait

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it lines, just wait. You're talking about the twenty two

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to nine game, friend. Yeah, yeah, if you look at

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the yards and all that kind of stuff, it was

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like that wasn't a thirteen point lost for them. That

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 1>was the game they should have covered, but they didn't

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because they thought a couple of breaks. Look, they were

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 1>listless against one of the worst defenses in the league

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>last week. I don't think they have anything left. I

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>just really don't. You saw that line go up, up,

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>up because of the COVID issues, which which are still

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a factor. Yeah. If this game was played three weeks earlier,

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the lines probably six. Right. I know I'm playing the

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>premium here, but I just think Denver is totally done.

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Fangio has done. The lockers are packed, the offices are

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>cleaned out. It's over and it's time to move on there. Okay,

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Drew lock Mr Jeff George's is not going to be

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>an nfocal. It's not even a backup. He's not even

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you know I I talked I was on with when

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Mintioned Paul were off the vacation before Christmas. I was

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>almost stormy and Shaun King he told me off air,

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, you have no idea how bad this Drew

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Lock is. This guy is an embarrassment. I mean, outside

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of the quarterbacks that haven't played in the league, he's

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely the worst. And he hasn't been wrong so far

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about his performance. He said to drop off between Bridgewater

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and Lock might be the biggest gap of anybody outside

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, and I think he's right. All right now, Frank,

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we do our two team six point teaser, Yeah, and

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take one of them. Is gonna be Washington

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just because I don't know that they're gonna need it,

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but you get them down to one served by five.

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I I like that. I think the Giants, as I

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about just packing in, they are the one team

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I can look at and say, yep, that team is quit.

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>They do not want to play football anymore. They have

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 1>a countdown in the locker room about how any days

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>left until we can go play golf any other one's Cardinals.

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, Look, the Cardinals go into this game NFC

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>West hopes still alive. They need the forty Niners to

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:10.399
<v Speaker 1>beat the Rams, but that could happen. I think you're

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>going to see the best out of the Cardinals and

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks other you know, yeah, they beat up lines,

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they beat up the Texas when else Russell's look terrible

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>against good teams. The Aks have looked terrible against good teams.

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you can give me the Cards down to

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>minus one, I like that minus a half. Were you

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>even going to give you minus a half? Because I

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>think there's six and a half. I agree with you.

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle's I don't know what's wrong with Russell Wilson.

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Is this just his injury or something that's his injury.

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that he's bad early in the year

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>like so, I think it's I think it's just injury related.

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And he came back to quick, and that's off to

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>him for doing it to be tough and saying I'm

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to bail my team out of this. But

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>he came back too quick, and that now he's paying

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the price, right, So we're we're going to learn a

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 1>lot about Russell Wilson in the first four weeks of

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>next season, I think, because if he's back to the

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>regular Russell Wilson or if something structurally. I tend to

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, Frank, I think it's just an injury thing.

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Because you have the lead in the teasers, you go

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>before me. Okay, I'm gonna go with my beloved Patriots. Uh,

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>their beloved to me because I have him thirty two

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to one and forty one to one to win the

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, and not that they will, but at least

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I could probably head that I'm gonna take Pats minus

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>a half. I think that Miami is fraudulent. Miami one

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a million games against bad teams, and hats off to

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Flores for writing the ship. And by the way, they

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of talent to a tag of Baloa,

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm not a fan. I just don't

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>see it. I don't see two a tug of loah,

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think they have a pretty decent defense and Flores,

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, rights the ship so they can beat the

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>teams that they they should beat. Uh, they did win

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the one game against the Ravens, but who are the Ravens.

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>The rest of those wins were against horrible teams. Now

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>we see them come out against the titan Is last week.

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>They play a real team. It's a real team. It's

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a real game. Now it's okay, are you really good,

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Miami or are you just Miami jokers? Well, here's what

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they are, their Miami jokers. They couldn't even keep this

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:14.840
<v Speaker 1>game closed. This game was over before it started. I

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>had everything tied, all my pregame stuff that I had

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 1>tied to, like money line parlays. I had them all

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>tied to Tennessee moneyline because I was just and I

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't concerned about it one bit at all. And and

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in betting, you're never not concerned, and I wasn't concerned.

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:30.799
<v Speaker 1>It looked like there's just no way that Miami can

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>compete with Tennessee. I don't think Miami is good. And

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>now they're gonna go against the Patriots team throw out

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that first game of the year when it was seventeen sixteen. Um,

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that was the first game of the year.

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the Patriots are just their different level, uh

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>than Miami, and and Bill Belichick will get a will

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>find a way to win it, and my second team

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the Niners plus ten and a

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>half because I agree with um both Gil and Frank

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on this game. Um, I just and if I get

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy g I think there's no way they're losing by

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>more than ten and a half. If I get Lands,

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be a little nervous, but even then they're

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna run the ball lot. It'll be tough to lose

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 1>by ten and a half. So give me Pats minus

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a half Niners plus ten and a half. That will

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>be my teaser. Uh, coronation, do you want to read

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:19.800
<v Speaker 1>gills teaser? Gill's teaser is Las Vegas Raiders plus nine,

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting because he also has the Chargers minus

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>three in the in the other in the picks, So

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting that he likes the Raiders Raiders plus nine

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and he has the woftis minus a half. And that's

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the Giants quitting story. Okay, I have the Wolf. Thee's

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Agree with Frank. Everybody's on the Wolf. And

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then I've taken the Falcons up to ten and a half.

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the Falcons win this game. Actually, Hill is awful.

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 1>It's really bad. I mean they beat. They beat a

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 1>god awful Carolina team because of their defense. I mean,

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this could be a look at the total in this

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 1>game of forty. I mean, I think this game is

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a little I just think the Falcons in

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the snow and they were down two scores and Buffalo

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was about to go up by twenty before half, and

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow they found themselves ahead and they fought in that game.

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that Atlanta is better here. I

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't use him as one of my place because four

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half, but I'm gonna use him in the teaser.

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think they win this game. I would

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be shocked if Taysom Hill and company can put up

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus points here in this game. I don't think

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Taysom Hills an NFL quarterback. I think they always knew

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he was in an NFL quarterback and they're just holding

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>on for dear life with Taysom Hill. But they have

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a good defense. Taysom Hill is not ready to be

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>an NFL quarterbacks, So how can you lay a million points?

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous. I mean, this is I totally agreeing. How

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>good do you think the Saints would have been if

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Jamis had been healthy off better. Actually, like for as

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for as bad as Jamis bad, Jamis's he he didn't

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>make plays, I mean throw five thousand yards on the

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>season like he He's not just incompetent, he just falls

0:50:01.800 --> 0:50:03.399
<v Speaker 1>apart at the wrong time. So I think they would

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>have been you know, ten eleven wins by now. If

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>if it takes him to dr I think they pass

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 1>him and Trevor simeon this far, I think Jamis would

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have been better for him. Okay, We're gonna go with

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the final two questions that we do every week, Frank,

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:22.879
<v Speaker 1>which of the big favorites is most likely to lose

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this week? It will define the big favorites? Is uh

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>seven or more? So here are your choices, the Chiefs,

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the Colts, the Bills, the Bucks or the Titans. All

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 1>these teams favored by more than a touchdown, which one

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is most likely to lose? Out right? Yeah? I did

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think about the Titans, but it's hard to come back Houston.

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm just gonna say the box because I

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>know arians are saying, we're all gonna we're gonna play this,

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna block what do the Bucks have to play

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>for this week? And there if they lose. Mike Evans

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 1>were drunk this week. Their offense is dust at that point,

0:50:57.760 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>like they are very thin on offense, and I think

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>it's point the Bucks are just gonna say, all right,

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>well we'll get a series out of Brady and just

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 1>get everybody out of there. Let's let's prepare for next week.

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:09.919
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to back the Panthers. They're awful. They're really

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>really bad football team. I mean, my goodness, it's tough

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch them. But I think if there's one team

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's out of those big papers are just gonna lay

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a egg because they don't really care that much and

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't have anything to play for, and they're just

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:23.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to get out of this thing without an injury.

0:51:23.800 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 1>And they've also dealt with this whole An Totio Brown

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 1>circus all week. I guess the Bucks are locked into

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the three. Right, they can't go down because they own

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the tiebreaker with Dallas. So yeah, I think they could

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 1>move up to two. Yeah, that's a really narrow runway

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they got to land on there. Todd, what if what

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>if the Bucks actually have something structurally wrong with them?

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>They lost nine nothing, right, I mean, how did they

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>score zero. I know, I know Saints are good, but

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>nine nothing. Then they had to for all for everything

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they owned. They had to get that Jets game. And

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, I had a money line parlay

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in game on that. I was like, I can't believe this,

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but they might lose this game to the Jets. I mean,

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that is unbelievable that their life and death to beat

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Maybe there's they're just not that good. I mean,

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's quite possible the Buccaneers are not this vaunted team

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that everyone thinks that they are, you know, especially with

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>all these injuries at the receiver position. So you know,

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on on that one. Frank, I think

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I think to make some great points about the Bucks.

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's spend a little shaky, a little shaker, and

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody watch it. I'm todd. I was watching that game.

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought that Sala did a lot of things to

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>lose that game. One, when you're up to scores in

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball in a second, if you can't run against

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks, so there's no point of trying to run

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball to kill Clark. Start to keep using your

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>passing game advanced too. Yeah, I did think about that.

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Fourth and that was the one that I was questioned like,

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I didn't questioned Cincinnati want is much. I thought that

0:52:57.320 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 1>one was worth Yeah, I would have kicked the field

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>goal and make Brady score and then have to go

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to overtime and beat you because you're you were moving

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball on Tampa Bay, throwing it the whole game,

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the whole game. Absolutely, I agree. I thought that was questionable.

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I honestly didn't hate the decision. I hated to play

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like you're trying to sneak it up forth and now, like,

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>but the decision like let's knock Brady out right now.

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hate it. I really, alright. I agree with

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 1>both of you guys. I think it's by the way

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>one Mike, you one more thing. What about the b

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>y U quarterback? Maybe you could be okay, I'm starting

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:30.799
<v Speaker 1>to think maybe. Look, I know you just rolled your

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>eyes and me, but maybe he's maybe he's got something.

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you think seems nothing? Seems small to me.

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It just seems small. Frank, What about you? What do

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about him? Do you think you could be? Okay?

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he might be the talents there, But it

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is troubling that the Jets A played three other quarterbacks

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, and all three looked better than than the kid.

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even Joe Flacco for that game he had

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to play, was like, oh Mike White, who had never

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 1>heard of I literally was like, who's like White? Oh?

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I watching here? And then Josh john And played too,

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and against Indian he looked fine. So when you've played

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 1>four quarterbacks in the year and Zach Wilson's the look

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fourth best out of those guys, it's a little trouble,

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really tumbling, really troubling with Mike White. I mean he

0:54:12.880 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>let Illinois to the roast Bull forty years ago and

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 1>still look better. That's a great God, that's a great

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I just thought the last couple of weeks. I thought

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 1>early in the season looked horrendous. The last couple of

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks I thought he looked okay. And the talents. I'm

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:29.840
<v Speaker 1>not giving up on anybody after what ten starts like

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>how many? Yeah, I'm not giving up on anybody. But

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some problems like bigger honestly, I think a bigger

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>question Trevor Lawrence, Like everybody wants to give him a

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:42.360
<v Speaker 1>pass urban the Jaguars, He's got to own his stuff

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>at some point. He has missed every throw I've seen

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>him make. He has not looked at any point like, hey,

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Trevor Lawrence Hubert prospect, Like maybe we're just

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:52.279
<v Speaker 1>giving him a pass for no good reason and he's

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not as good as well. That's the thing. If you

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:57.879
<v Speaker 1>played for Clemson and you get to stand back there

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and nobody comes anywhere near you in college, how do

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you even know if these guys are going to be good?

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's the whole, you know, crazy thing. He

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 1>also had great running games at Clemson with him too, right,

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's and that's what he was. He was

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 1>feuding with Urban about about not using the running game

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>at all and throwing the ball times a game. He's

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:17.880
<v Speaker 1>used to going into the two set where they had

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>to respect the running game, and they couldn't, you know,

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't just drop back five guys in nickel all

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the time against him in college. You're right, Toddy had

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of open throws. Kenny Pickett also, by the way,

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be very very very careful. I'm not a Kenny. I

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 1>love pitting football, of course, you know, I mean, I'll

0:55:35.520 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>bet against him all the time. But um, by the way,

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that ball game is unbelievable loss. I don't know if

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys were watching the Pit Bowl game when they're

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>getting three and a half and they're ahead by eleven

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth quarter and somehow didn't cover because that

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:52.800
<v Speaker 1>interception at the end. Thank god I didn't have that.

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I had Michigan State plus six and haf thin game.

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But the Kenny Pickett. I don't think Kenny Pickett is

0:55:59.200 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a big time quarterback. I know he's the

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:04.360
<v Speaker 1>best either, considering him the best coming, I don't see it.

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be like they'll think, oh Kenny Pickett,

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and he'll end up like an NFL backup. I don't.

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it with Kenny Pickett. What do you

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think about our doozy? I think nar Doozy is okay

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for I think he's okay for Pitt. I mean, remember

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Pitt can't recruit the way these I mean, this is

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a city school. It's not like one of these big power,

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, teams like Clemson, and it's certainly not an

0:56:29.480 --> 0:56:31.840
<v Speaker 1>SEC type of team. You know, Pitt's a city school.

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not really you know, it's it's Pit's really more

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like Cincinnati is and Cincinnati was like, oh wow, it's

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing Cincinnati made made the college football playoffs. I think

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Nardozy remember how bad Pitt was before Nardozy. Pitt had

0:56:44.320 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>some horrendous seasons, absolutely horrendous. So you know, I thought,

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:51.359
<v Speaker 1>our joy is not that bad. You You obviously don't

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like him. Is that why you're asking me that? Like

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>he does some questionable things? Yeah, I know, I'm not

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 1>saying he's great. I'm just saying for Pitt, it's you know,

0:56:58.840 --> 0:57:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who are they gonna get? Was going to Pit to

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 1>be the coach right and hold out to Paul Chris.

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, Paul Chris isn't even great Chrisconsin Wisconsin alone,

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.759
<v Speaker 1>so he's good for what Wisconsin is gonna I'm sure

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they're mad at him this week because of what happened

0:57:16.880 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in the last four downs. He had to cover the

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 1>spread seven and a half. That was Anyways, Mikey, what

0:57:25.200 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 1>are we up to? And we're up to that Bizarro

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>question where if you could bet every body every game

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on the board, but you could only pick one. You

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>had to bet every game on the board, but you

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 1>could pick one not to bet which game would it be?

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Which game do you want no part of Frank's vikings.

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 1>This is easy. This might be out of all however,

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 1>many games around the entire schedule, this that might be

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the one. How could you even have an angle here?

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And then today Justin Fields goes on to COVID so

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not even getting him. We're getting holes and the vikings.

0:57:56.760 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Both coaches are gonna get fired the Viking My quit

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 1>on Mike Zimmer after Telemanto to the bus, who knows

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting out of this game? Please? No, I

0:58:05.680 --> 0:58:13.439
<v Speaker 1>have no no desire Todd Bengals Brown's obviously by the line,

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the Bengals are not going to be

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>trying um and the Browns? Who what is this team?

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 1>This Browns is they're confounding this team. You know, Baker Mayfield,

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I didn't. I never liked Baker Mayfield. But

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>now they're just like going to the entire other way.

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Now he's like the worst quarterback of all time. He

0:58:31.760 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>actually could be okay if he would stop throwing the

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>ball to the other team. You know, he he's really

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not that bad. If he would just stop the interceptions.

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 1>They have a running game. Why are they not pounding

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball with Chubb. I don't understand this team. I

0:58:45.440 --> 0:58:48.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want any part of that last ridiculous game. I'm

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:53.919
<v Speaker 1>going to agree with Frank bears vikings here um meaningless game.

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Very disappointing for Minnesota. They thought there would be a

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>playoff team this year. I know we talked to Paul

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Allen before the year. He said he'd be shocked if

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they didn't win eleven games. And they had, you know,

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 1>all those games that came down to the final player

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 1>early and then the unvaccinated Cousins is out and the

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:11.040
<v Speaker 1>season just they they just got behind him. They were

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:13.440
<v Speaker 1>always but behind the chains in terms of a season,

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>uh for the Viking. So I really want I want

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>no part of it. I agree with Frank. I think

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they're both out. But what about Jackie Cheryl? I thought

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Cheryl recruited pretty well at pit. That was in

0:59:25.120 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>our heyday. That was in our heyday before it all

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>fell apart in the early eighties and our heyday we

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:32.840
<v Speaker 1>were serious, of course, but that was before the you know,

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 1>college football landscape changed. You know, that was when they're

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know if you ever watched these youtubes,

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes I get stuck on YouTube. I'm looking watching

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:43.440
<v Speaker 1>these nineteen seventies seven Tony Dorset against uh, you know,

0:59:44.160 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>or against Notre Dame and Dan Marino against Syracuse, and

0:59:47.320 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I remember that when I was eleven, and

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like, it's just but that was that was a

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>different world when it wasn't. It wasn't Jackie Chryl the

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>wan that castrated the bowl in front of it. Yes,

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that was a m that was okay, that one of

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Alzheimer's, one of the all time great stories, like, hey,

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>let's fire these kids up. Okay, And you know, Pitch

1:00:09.040 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>should have won another title with Jackie Sherrow. Of course,

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they won under Johnny Majors. Then Johnny Major's left and

1:00:14.200 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they had Jackie Cheryl and Pitt was like number one

1:00:16.720 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of those seasons and just couldn't get it

1:00:18.720 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>done to win the national title even with Marino. And

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we had a couple of times we were finished just barely,

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know. Well, but they beat they beat Duly and

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bulldogs in that Sugar Bowl. Remember with Marino, they

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>beat Herschew Walkers, John Brown. Yeah, of course that that

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>was but we weren't. But we weren't playing for it

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because they lost. Yeah they were eight or something like that. Yeah,

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but we we took the leader. That was I remember

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a huge game. Pit Pen State. Pit Penn

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>State used to be like a serious thing and it

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was like Auburn and uh, you know Alabama. It was

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like a serious, serious rivalry and you know whatever. They

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>called it the Or Bowl at the Iron Bowl, but

1:00:55.160 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the Or Bowl. Uh, all right, Frank, we want to

1:00:57.960 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joan us today. You've been at the

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>River a guest to the megapod, and you are continue

1:01:02.920 --> 1:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to be for our show odds on and as well

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>as across the Vista landscape. So thank you for taking

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the time. There's a pleasure, guys. This is a ton

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of I'm talking about with you, guys. Todd, Thank Todd.

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for all to help you've been to Gil

1:01:16.560 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>through this very tough time, and for and soldiering on

1:01:19.600 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and getting the megapod done. For all the trip trip

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>tempers and the RAJ bodies that really you know, live

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>only by vicariously through this megapod. So we were we

1:01:31.040 --> 1:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>were able to do it, and we thanked them, and

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of course Gil is in our thoughts and our prayers,

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as his whole family as they lay his

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>dad to rest today. That's it for us, Week eighteen

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL, the Beating, the Book Megapod. Thank you,

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Frank Schwab, Todd wishing IF and Mike Palm wishing you

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>all the great weekend.