Speaker 1: All right, News roundup and information Overload hour. Here's our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. It's eight hundred and ninety four
Speaker 1: to one, Shawn, if you want to join us. We're
Speaker 1: going to get an update on the big, one, big
Speaker 1: beautiful bill that the President now has given the Senate
Speaker 1: permission to mark it up and make improvements and even
Speaker 1: find more cost savings, which I know will make a
Speaker 1: lot of House members happy that have been part of
Speaker 1: the conflict leading up to that vote. It was close.
Speaker 1: But what will happen is the Senate will pass their version,
Speaker 1: They'll go into a conference, and then hopefully both sides,
Speaker 1: both the Senate and the House, will vote, and the
Speaker 1: President will sign the bill, and we'll have money to
Speaker 1: secure our borders. We'll have money to deport illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: We'll have money to build the next generation of weaponry.
Speaker 1: We'll have money to begin the process of being energy dominant.
Speaker 1: We will also have the largest tax cut in American history,
Speaker 1: with no tax on tips, social security, or overtime. All
Speaker 1: big things that the President is putting in place. But
Speaker 1: before we get to that, I want to go to
Speaker 1: the issue of Russia. And Vladimir Putin. And this is
Speaker 1: what the President said about Putin yesterday.
Speaker 2: I'm not happy with what Putin's doing. He's killing a
Speaker 2: lot of people, and I don't know what the hell
Speaker 2: happened to Putin. I've known him a long time, always.
Speaker 3: Gotten along with him.
Speaker 2: But he's sending rockets into cities and killing people, and
Speaker 2: I don't like it at all. Okay, we're in the
Speaker 2: middle of talking and he's shooting rockets into Kiev and
Speaker 2: other cities.
Speaker 4: I don't like it at all.
Speaker 5: That's when you're unhappy with President Putin.
Speaker 6: I've talked before about putting more sanctions on Russia.
Speaker 5: Is that something you're considering more?
Speaker 2: Absolutely, he's killing a lot of people. I don't know
Speaker 2: what's wrong with him. What the hell happened to him? Right,
Speaker 2: He's killing a lot of people.
Speaker 5: I'm not happy about that anyway.
Speaker 1: Then he further went on to say that he's gone crazy.
Speaker 1: There are now eighty two senators that have signed on
Speaker 1: to a huge, massive Russia sanctions bill. I would argue
Speaker 1: that is one part of the equation, but unfortunately it's
Speaker 1: been Europe and the continent of Europe that has been
Speaker 1: funding Putin's war machine because they've been purchasing oil and
Speaker 1: gas from Vladimir Putin for the longest period of time
Speaker 1: at a discounted price. And none of these countries are
Speaker 1: paying their fair share when it comes to NATO. Anyway,
Speaker 1: here to weigh in on this, the economy and so
Speaker 1: much more, is Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, Senator always
Speaker 1: a pleasure to have you.
Speaker 4: Welcome back, sir, teller Shawn, It's good to be back
Speaker 4: with you.
Speaker 1: I am tired of Europe making Putin rich. They want
Speaker 1: to buy cheap energy. He's giving them energy at a discounted price,
Speaker 1: that is funding his war machine. And meanwhile, they will
Speaker 1: not pay their fair share to NATO and ME. And
Speaker 1: it's their continent that is, you know, under fire and
Speaker 1: under threat by Vladimir Putin and his unpredictability in his
Speaker 1: territorial ambition. Why won't Why would Europe make Putin rich
Speaker 1: the way they're making them rich.
Speaker 4: Now, well, saw it's because they want to have their
Speaker 4: cake and eat it too. And that's been the case
Speaker 4: with Europe, especially Germany and Russia for many years. They've
Speaker 4: helped underwrite the Russian war machine by continuing to buy
Speaker 4: cheap energy from Russia. But as you heard President Trump's
Speaker 4: sage just then, and his patients is wearing out. Vladimer
Speaker 4: re Putin has been incredibly disrespectful to President Trump's efforts
Speaker 4: to negotiate a ceasefire.
Speaker 7: Here.
Speaker 4: President Trump and President Zelensky are willing to put out
Speaker 4: terms for a thirty day seas fire. And what does
Speaker 4: Slader Reputin do. He doesn't just continue the fighting on
Speaker 4: the front lines. He launches unprecedented missile and drone attacks
Speaker 4: on civilians and cities far away from the front lines.
Speaker 4: He's also mentioned the legislation that we happen to send
Speaker 4: it with over eighty senators that would crack down on
Speaker 4: Russia's energy exports. A lot of those, by the way,
Speaker 4: go to China. We would make sure that it makes
Speaker 4: it completely uneconomical for Russia to continue to export that oil,
Speaker 4: and that would also stop its financing for its war machine.
Speaker 4: But we do need Europe to take European security at
Speaker 4: least as seriously as we hear in the United States
Speaker 4: take it well.
Speaker 5: I agree.
Speaker 1: So the sanctioned bill is going to pass, don't we
Speaker 1: need to insist ahead of time that Europe stop all
Speaker 1: business with Russia. Until this war comes to an end.
Speaker 1: And what pressure can the President put on President Chi
Speaker 1: and India to stop importing energy from Russia.
Speaker 4: Well, I think President Trump is inexactly right to pressure
Speaker 4: Europe to cut backpe on its energy imports from Russia.
Speaker 4: And I think he can show that this bill that
Speaker 4: we could pass in the Senate would not be directed
Speaker 4: just towards countries like China that's importing so much Russian oil,
Speaker 4: but European countries as well. And again, they can't expect
Speaker 4: us to take their security more seriously than they take it.
Speaker 4: They can't expect us to put at risk the international
Speaker 4: energy markets while they are continuing trying to buy cheap
Speaker 4: energy from Russia that has had some success in the
Speaker 4: defense say, Shane, you know you're probably in the news
Speaker 4: that other countries, notably Germany, has increased the amount of
Speaker 4: defense support it's providing to Ukraine. It's just lifted the
Speaker 4: range restrictions on the missiles have already provided to Ukraine.
Speaker 4: I think that's the direct result of President Trump insisting
Speaker 4: that they begin to pull more of their share of
Speaker 4: the loads. So hopefully you see the same thing in
Speaker 4: the energy space as well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we definitely need to let's talk about
Speaker 1: this one big, beautiful bill. I know there's been some
Speaker 1: some vocal opposition. Rand Paul's one person, Ron Johnson has
Speaker 1: been another person, Senator Ted Cruz believes that they can
Speaker 1: find more moneyes to cut from the from the House version.
Speaker 1: I'm fine with that. I think it'll actually go over
Speaker 1: pretty well in the House. Where does it stand in
Speaker 1: the Senate? And do you believe it's going to.
Speaker 5: Pay us well.
Speaker 4: We're excited that the House passed the legislation last week.
Speaker 4: We're looking forward to taking it up next week and
Speaker 4: in the weeks ahead. You know, I command the Speaker
Speaker 4: for navigating very difficult politics in the House. Obviously, the
Speaker 4: Sendate will have some input on the bill. You mentioned
Speaker 4: some of that, Sean, we'd like to find a little
Speaker 4: bit more savings and Medicaid. Medicaid is a critical program
Speaker 4: for many of our kansions, for elderly poor, for pregnant women,
Speaker 4: for poor children, for the blind, that disabled. It shouldn't
Speaker 4: be providing health insurance though, to freeloaders and illegals. You know,
Speaker 4: if you're a grown man, you should be able to
Speaker 4: continue to work. If you're able bodied or at least
Speaker 4: go to school or get job training if the taxpayer
Speaker 4: is going to provide for your health insurance. Likewise, on
Speaker 4: the tax code, the House pass the bill that doesn't
Speaker 4: have complete permanents, we would love to be able to
Speaker 4: get away to make sure all of those tax cuts
Speaker 4: for families and for small businesses are permanent, so we
Speaker 4: don't have this cycle again in another six, eight, ten years,
Speaker 4: so families and businesses can plan for the future. So
Speaker 4: those are just a few areas where we hope to
Speaker 4: make some small improvements from the bills. And I think
Speaker 4: it's going to be something that the House can pass
Speaker 4: once we're done with it, and then the President can sign
Speaker 4: very soon.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, what do you think the improvements will be like?
Speaker 1: For example, we can go over the Medicaid provisions. I mean,
Speaker 1: what doctor Oz was telling us on this program is
Speaker 1: is beyond the warming in terms of Medicare and what
Speaker 1: it is. It's like a cancer that has metastasized. And
Speaker 1: you know, if you look at, for example, Medicaid outlays,
Speaker 1: they have been skyrocketing through the roof the last twenty years.
Speaker 1: The FED spent one hundred and sixty billion in fiscal
Speaker 1: year two thousand and three five hundred and ninety one
Speaker 1: billion in fiscal year twenty twenty three. That's three and
Speaker 1: a half times as much. State level spending has gone
Speaker 1: up three times, and Democrats have steadily been pushing towards
Speaker 1: this universal health coverage at taxpayer expense and quote Medicare
Speaker 1: for all, you know, except using the program originally intended
Speaker 1: to cover the poor, not one designed for the elderly.
Speaker 1: And then the process Medicaid's grown from covering the poor
Speaker 1: to covering the near poor and covering pretty much everybody.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Sean, I think doctor Oz made some good points
Speaker 4: and laid out some possible possible changes. Again, there are
Speaker 4: work requirements in the House bill for Medicaid. We might
Speaker 4: like to try to pull those work requirements forward. I
Speaker 4: mean we think again, able bodied men should be working.
Speaker 4: Taxpayer is going to put the bill to their health insurance.
Speaker 4: It's not a program for free loaders or for that matter,
Speaker 4: illegal aliens, as is the case in many Democratic states
Speaker 4: like California. Another possible form is that a lot of
Speaker 4: Democratic states in effect gain the system. They take one
Speaker 4: dollar in tax from their hospitals. In return, they're getting
Speaker 4: multiple dollars back from the federal government to give back
Speaker 4: to those hospitals. We don't want to see those kinds
Speaker 4: of abuses in democratic states because Republican states generally are
Speaker 4: running a tighter ship. We don't want anyone to lose
Speaker 4: benefits if they deserve those benefits, but we want to
Speaker 4: make sure that no one is getting Medicaid benefits that
Speaker 4: doesn't deserve it, because, as doctor Oz says that the
Speaker 4: finances for Medicaid and long term are not looking very
Speaker 4: very good.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's pretty amazing, and I'm pretty confident it's going
Speaker 1: to pass. I think this is the most conservative bill
Speaker 1: I've seen in my lifetime. Am I wrong in believing
Speaker 1: that when you factor in securing our borders importing illegals,
Speaker 1: what it does for opening up energy dominance, what it
Speaker 1: does in terms of the largest tax cut in history,
Speaker 1: including no tax on tips, social Security, or overtime, what
Speaker 1: it does to build the next generation of weaponry. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying it's the perfect bill. I'm saying it's the
Speaker 1: most conservative bill, ambitiously conservative bill that I think I've
Speaker 1: seen in my lifetime.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Sean, this bill is going to pass, and it's
Speaker 4: going to go to the President for his signature. Obviously
Speaker 4: we're work through or whatever small differences we have the
Speaker 4: states and the districts that we all represent. But there's
Speaker 4: just too much to stake here. It's not just the
Speaker 4: fact that you have the largest tax increase in American
Speaker 4: history coming at the end of the year if we
Speaker 4: don't pass the bill, but all the points you just
Speaker 4: made sewn that sometimes get lost in the shuffle because
Speaker 4: there's so much focus on taxes and on healthcare. This
Speaker 4: bill will start to rebuild our military. It'll provide the
Speaker 4: administration the resources it needs to completely secure the border,
Speaker 4: and again more effective and efficient deportation against illegals in
Speaker 4: the country. It'll help unleash American energy production. So I
Speaker 4: think this bill is going to pass the Senate. It's
Speaker 4: going to pass it, hopefully sooner rather than later, and
Speaker 4: then I think the House can pass it and send
Speaker 4: it to the president.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that'll be pretty good. Let me ask you this,
Speaker 1: the issue of the Middle East and Iran is coming
Speaker 1: to a head. My understanding is there over sixty percent
Speaker 1: in terms of enrichment. To go from sixty to ninety percent,
Speaker 1: which is weapon grade weapons grade enrichment, is it can
Speaker 1: happen in a very short period of time weeks, uh
Speaker 1: not months, and that these negotiations are critical to me
Speaker 1: very There are two very key provisions that must exist.
Speaker 1: One is they can no longer enrich uranium. They should
Speaker 1: have to dismantle the nuclear facilities. If they want nuclear power,
Speaker 1: they can do what the UAE does and import the
Speaker 1: rods that then cannot be turned into weapon grade uranium.
Speaker 1: And beyond that, we need anywhere, any place, anytime American inspectors.
Speaker 1: If you want other countries, that's fine, but American inspectors
Speaker 1: need to be able to go where they want, when
Speaker 1: they want and check out these facilities without those Without
Speaker 1: that insurance policy, I think any terms you've come to
Speaker 1: with the Iranians would be useless.
Speaker 4: Yes, Sean, I think that's exactly right. And it's what
Speaker 4: President Trump has said and Steve what talk is chief
Speaker 4: negotiator said or redline is any kind of enrichment ability,
Speaker 4: because if you can enriched to any level, you can
Speaker 4: enrich the weapons grade. And that's what Iran has proven
Speaker 4: over the last four years as they started to break
Speaker 4: out towards weapon grade level enrichment during the Biden administration.
Speaker 4: That's why President Trump and Steve Whitcoff and Marco Rubio
Speaker 4: and JD. Vance have all been perfectly clear. Any enrichment
Speaker 4: program for Iran is a red line that the United
Speaker 4: States cannot allow.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break right back more with Arkansas Senator
Speaker 1: Tom Cotton on the other side as we continue, than
Speaker 1: your calls coming up, eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn,
Speaker 1: straight ahead, we'll continue with Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton is
Speaker 1: with us. Let me ask you this, as you look
Speaker 1: at the Democratic Party and all this discussion about Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and his cognitive state senator, With all due respect
Speaker 1: to everybody in this what I call state run legacy
Speaker 1: media mob, we went back on this radio program in
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, we were pointing out Joe Biden's cognitive decline,
Speaker 1: pointed it out all through the twenty twenty election. We
Speaker 1: pointed it out on TV on Hannity every single night.
Speaker 1: And for people to act like they're shocked and surprised
Speaker 1: and they can't believe it and they didn't know it
Speaker 1: until the debate happened is frankly just a lie. And
Speaker 1: to me, it's now evolved into the biggest White House
Speaker 1: scandal in our lifetime. By far, and that is the
Speaker 1: Joe Biden cognitive cover up.
Speaker 4: Your reaction to it all, Sean, It's a total lie.
Speaker 4: It's media and the Democrats trying to blame each other
Speaker 4: for lying to the American people. You, I and anyone
Speaker 4: with common stance in two eyes could tail not in
Speaker 4: twenty twenty four, but in twenty nineteen that Joe Biden
Speaker 4: was no longer fit to be president. They covered up
Speaker 4: all the way back then. The original sin was not
Speaker 4: him running for reelection. It was running him running for
Speaker 4: election in twenty nineteen twenty twenty, and the Democrats and
Speaker 4: the media covered it up back then. Also, Sean, I
Speaker 4: have to add, even if Joe Biden had been sharp
Speaker 4: as attack and fit as a fiddle, he still would
Speaker 4: have lost in twenty twenty four. And Harris did lose
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty four, not just because he was old,
Speaker 4: but because he was a failure and his liberal policies
Speaker 4: were a failure for America.
Speaker 1: Well, that's why this one big, beautiful bill will get
Speaker 1: us out from underneath the Biden economy. And I am
Speaker 1: very confident that there's going to be more trade deals.
Speaker 1: Let's see how right I am. And I'm predicting that
Speaker 1: we're going to probably hear about them in the week,
Speaker 1: in days and weeks to come, and hopefully we can,
Speaker 1: you know, get an end to war in Europe, a war,
Speaker 1: an end to the war in the Middle East, and
Speaker 1: hopefully we can get the economy humming, and hopefully everybody
Speaker 1: will earn reelection and the Democrats won't get their dream
Speaker 1: of impeaching Donald Trump. Thirty times anyway, Senator Tom Cotton, Arkansas,
Speaker 1: we appreciate you, Thank you, sir, thank you.
Speaker 7: Sean.
Speaker 1: All right, twenty five now till the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine to four one. Shawn is our number.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Look Israel, they're fighting for their survival every single day
Speaker 1: and have been since October seventh, twenty twenty three. And
Speaker 1: their safety today depends on the brave men and women
Speaker 1: of the IDF. Every citizen in Israel they are required
Speaker 1: to serve, and many do so without family nearby, without
Speaker 1: job prospects, even after in many cases their service is
Speaker 1: leaving their families struggling just to get by.
Speaker 5: Now, on top of that, they.
Speaker 1: Have tens and tens of thousands of Israelis that have
Speaker 1: been displaced, and this is where the International Fellowship of
Speaker 1: Christians and Jews comes in. We have partnered with them,
Speaker 1: and thanks to your generosity, they're providing tons of humanitarian support,
Speaker 1: and that means food and water, and medicines and shelter
Speaker 1: and clothing. They're also providing safety gear and flack jackets
Speaker 1: and bomb shelters and anyway. It is incredible the work
Speaker 1: that they're doing. But they need as much financial support
Speaker 1: as possible in their time and need. I mean, this
Speaker 1: country fighting at seven front warts insane. Whatever you can
Speaker 1: donate to be as generous as you can. Give him
Speaker 1: a call. This is going to be used probably the
Speaker 1: next day to help feed people and shelter people and
Speaker 1: clothe people eight eight eight four eight eight. If CJ
Speaker 1: eight eight eight four eight eight, IFCJ on the web,
Speaker 1: it's IFCJ dot org. That's IFCJ dot org. As we
Speaker 1: pray for an end to this conflict in the Middle East,
Speaker 1: hopefully sooner rather than later. You know, it's really amazing
Speaker 1: to me that James Comy, mister Higher Honor, is as
Speaker 1: arrogant as he is. This is a guy that signed
Speaker 1: that was warned not to use Hillary Clinton's dirty Russian
Speaker 1: disinformation dossier because it was political in nature and it
Speaker 1: was unverified, and it was debunked before he signed the
Speaker 1: second PHIZA warrant and the PISA warrant. The bulk of
Speaker 1: information provided to the Phiz of court was that dirty dossier.
Speaker 1: Signed three of the four want warrants against Carter Page,
Speaker 1: which gave a backdoor into Trump world because the Carter
Speaker 1: Page's work into work with the Trump campaign. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's pretty unbelievable. The same guy that even though they
Speaker 1: find top secret classified information all over Hillary Clintons servers,
Speaker 1: even though they knew that she destroyed, you know, servers
Speaker 1: with bleach bit and destroyed devices with hammers and removed
Speaker 1: sim cards, no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute. But and the
Speaker 1: same thing with Joe Biden. He has top secret classified
Speaker 1: information in four separate locations. The FBI does nothing nothing,
Speaker 1: And neither Hillary nor Joe Biden had presidential immunity because
Speaker 1: neither had been president by that at that time, and
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was president. He didn't pack the boxes that
Speaker 1: went tomorrow lago, and he was working with the FBI.
Speaker 1: He gave access remain to the FBI to go all
Speaker 1: over mar a Lago and after they did, they said,
Speaker 1: would you mind putting an extra padlock on one particular
Speaker 1: door or room that they had been in. Nobody was
Speaker 1: stopping them from taking anything out of that room. And
Speaker 1: meanwhile they just come and they raid mar A Lago.
Speaker 1: Now we need to get to the bottom of that
Speaker 1: in the double standard. But you talk about the weaponization
Speaker 1: of justice, and then you think of other things that
Speaker 1: happened during Comy's term. I mean, this is when we started,
Speaker 1: you know, looking at moms and dads at school board meetings.
Speaker 1: You know, moms like Linda that are kind of loud
Speaker 1: and outspoken and go to school board meetings and stir
Speaker 1: up the pot a little bit, all right, looking at
Speaker 1: them as domestic terrorists or peaceful pro life protesters. Well,
Speaker 1: now we know where the mindset comes from. Listen to
Speaker 1: what James Comy had to say about one of the
Speaker 1: two political parties is white supremacists adjacent at a minimum.
Speaker 1: This is mister eighty six forty seven just tapping the
Speaker 1: c seashells that said, yeah, eighty six forty seven, I
Speaker 1: had no idea that meant maybe to kill Donald Trump list.
Speaker 6: Probably there could be changes at the margins, but in
Speaker 6: the main we have the tools. There are cultural impediments
Speaker 6: to doing this work. Let's say you work in the FBI.
Speaker 6: You know that one of the two political parties is,
Speaker 6: let me put it nicely, white supremacist adjacent at a minimum,
Speaker 6: and so why would you want to throw your career
Speaker 6: on that side of the line and be summoned to
Speaker 6: Capitol Hilton, He asked, why are you pursuing these innocent groups?
Speaker 6: And so we have a cultural impediment to working it effectively.
Speaker 6: That should get more intention than it does.
Speaker 1: We know one of the two political parties is white
Speaker 1: supremacist adjacent at a minimum. This man has a prejudice
Speaker 1: against conservatives that is palpable. Now, he declined to explain
Speaker 1: calling Republicans and conser servatives white supremacist adjacent. And he
Speaker 1: had the opportunity the day after he said this to
Speaker 1: to clarify, and here's what he said.
Speaker 8: I was just gonna ask you what the MSNBC interview
Speaker 8: you were doing, because on social media everyone's saying he's
Speaker 8: talking about the white supremacist adjacent Republican Party. Everybody in
Speaker 8: the party, voters, what what's you want to clarify?
Speaker 5: I wanna thank you, no clarification and.
Speaker 6: Well, no, I'm not gonna comment on Okay, thank you, well,
Speaker 6: thank you.
Speaker 1: Hello, I'm not going to comment on that. It's so
Speaker 1: frightening that this guy was the FBI director.
Speaker 5: It really is.
Speaker 1: H I am so excited about our Patriot of Punchlines
Speaker 1: and Patriots tour. We're going back on the road. Tickets
Speaker 1: has got now gone on sale. You can go to
Speaker 1: Hannity dot com. Uh Now, if you were in Tampa
Speaker 1: or Clearwater, if you're in the Panhandle wherever you happen
Speaker 1: to be, maybe Orlando, you can make the trip over.
Speaker 5: We'd love to have you.
Speaker 1: H We are our with me and Jimmy Fayla, and
Speaker 1: we're putting together a great show. It's gonna be fun, informative, patriotic, independent,
Speaker 1: it's funny. I mean, there's nobody funnier than this guy.
Speaker 1: He really is great. And anyway, our first date is Saturday,
Speaker 1: June twenty eighth, at seven pm. It's at Ruth Eckert
Speaker 1: Hall that's in Clearwater, Florida. The next night Sunday, June
Speaker 1: twenty ninth, both events seven pm. This is going to
Speaker 1: be in Fort Lauderdale. So if you're in Miami or
Speaker 1: Palm Beach or Fort Lauderdale or West Palm Beach or Boca,
Speaker 1: wherever you happen to be. Yeah, it's going to be
Speaker 1: at the Broward Center for Performing Arts. Tickets are now
Speaker 1: on sale and going fast. Just go to Hannity dot
Speaker 1: com and we look forward to seeing you. And when
Speaker 1: we're really looking to put on a great show for you,
Speaker 1: it's going to be fun, funny, entertaining, enlightening, patriotic, all
Speaker 1: the things that you won't get at any other show.
Speaker 1: And there's so much to make fun of. Theyre really
Speaker 1: is just I've never been more material than you could
Speaker 1: ever draw from in your entire life. All right, let's
Speaker 1: get I hope you'll come anyway. It's all available Handy
Speaker 1: dot com, Hannity Media. In the meantime, let's say hi
Speaker 1: to Richard in Ohio. Richard, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 5: Sir?
Speaker 7: Hi? I have a question for you about your Berna lunchers.
Speaker 4: Yes, sir, okay, I work.
Speaker 7: In a marina. I work third shift as a security guard,
Speaker 7: and I deal with a lot of drunk people and
Speaker 7: a lot of domestic disputes over like bumping in the boats.
Speaker 7: Or you know about bumping into another boat, or some
Speaker 7: guy who's looking at a girl and his wife or
Speaker 7: a girlfriend got jealous, that type stuff. But sometimes it
Speaker 7: gets violent. You have to step in intervene. Of course,
Speaker 7: I carry you right now, but I don't want to
Speaker 7: take and shoot somebody for something that is a mistake.
Speaker 7: You know, I mean they were drunk, or they accidentally
Speaker 7: did this or that.
Speaker 5: Well, I would matter if you have a license to carry.
Speaker 5: You don't. You don't even need a license to carry
Speaker 5: a burner, you know. The only thing I.
Speaker 1: Would do is I probably would go to your company
Speaker 1: and say, hey, I'd rather use this non lethal option
Speaker 1: in a situation and not only have the option of
Speaker 1: lethal force. And I don't see why they would ever
Speaker 1: say no. Now you have over and we're getting close
Speaker 1: to a thousand, but well over five hundred government agencies
Speaker 1: and law enforcement and police departments and security firms like
Speaker 1: yours that are using this burner technology because it is
Speaker 1: so effective at incapacitating people. We have the videos when
Speaker 1: you go to their website BYRNA dot com. I don't
Speaker 1: see why they wouldn't let you have it. I like
Speaker 1: both options. My first option is to talk my way
Speaker 1: out of something and walk away and nobody gets hurt.
Speaker 1: If I have to my section. The second option would
Speaker 1: be the burner launcher. And then if it's a life
Speaker 1: or death situation, you know, only as a last resort
Speaker 1: would I ever want to pull out a firearm, because
Speaker 1: if you pull it out, you better intend to use
Speaker 1: it exactly.
Speaker 7: But which my question is though they come in three
Speaker 7: hundred or four hundred feet per second or so?
Speaker 5: Which right, Well, that's.
Speaker 1: The smallest version, which is the easiest to carry. Is
Speaker 1: the cl model that they just produced. It's four inches long,
Speaker 1: it's about two cell phones thick, and it's it's a
Speaker 1: very powerful launcher.
Speaker 5: It does the job and it's simple to.
Speaker 7: Carry, and then it shoots the what kinetic grounds and pepper.
Speaker 1: Spray, yes, sir, pepper spray and tear gas depending on
Speaker 1: what state you're in. But they like, for example, if
Speaker 1: you order it, they know what the state law is
Speaker 1: and you'll get the proper projectiles. But everybody can use
Speaker 1: the kinetic rounds. And but yeah, you know, like for example,
Speaker 1: my free state of Florida allows pepper spray and tear gas.
Speaker 5: New York did not allow that.
Speaker 1: So I had a more modified projectile that I used
Speaker 1: in New York when I would carry it New York.
Speaker 7: Okay, Well, next on I was my question was, uh,
Speaker 7: you know which which how powerful should I get?
Speaker 1: You know, they're they're all powerful, they're all effective. It
Speaker 1: just as a matter of if you know, if you're
Speaker 1: carrying another firearm, you probably want the cel which is
Speaker 1: more compact and would do the job for you. If
Speaker 1: you want the larger one, you can get it. I
Speaker 1: actually get red dots on all of mine. I just
Speaker 1: like I just I just happen to like it. You
Speaker 1: don't have to think at that point and in a
Speaker 1: moment where even though I was a pistol marksman at eleven,
Speaker 1: I don't see as well as I used to do
Speaker 1: number one and number two. Although I I've got to
Speaker 1: be honest. I mean I can fire this where I
Speaker 1: can't fire a firearm because of hearing loss from doing
Speaker 1: radio for so long. But I use the photarget practice
Speaker 1: all the time, and and I make an pretty nice cluster.
Speaker 1: They have inert rounds you can fire and practice with.
Speaker 5: Oh nice, you'll like it.
Speaker 1: And you can go out in your backyard or go
Speaker 1: to a safe place, go to a range wherever you
Speaker 1: want to do it all right, my friend Richard check
Speaker 1: it out BYRNA dot com. I think you'll be happy
Speaker 1: with it and they'll give you another option. Herb in
Speaker 1: South Carolina next Sean Hannity show, What's up?
Speaker 4: Herb?
Speaker 3: How are you hey, Uncle Sean? I know when I
Speaker 3: get sick, I know who to call.
Speaker 5: Oh boy, poor, great, you know.
Speaker 1: And the thing is, I was glad to help Velma,
Speaker 1: but man, she gave me a hard time.
Speaker 3: I promise I won't.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 1: I mean, do you if I feel like somebody's not
Speaker 1: doing their job, or I feel like did not taking
Speaker 1: it seriously, or they're not giving her the attention that
Speaker 1: she needs, I'm gonna.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna be as forceful as I need to be.
Speaker 1: I was polite, but I was forceful, and I'm like, no,
Speaker 1: that's not good enough.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 1: They I remember that one day they were trying to
Speaker 1: get blood draw blood from her and that they were
Speaker 1: having a hard time, and I'm like, giving up is
Speaker 1: not an option here, And then the one nurse had
Speaker 1: to go get another nurse.
Speaker 5: Then then they are to get another.
Speaker 1: I'm like, will you please get an expert, get a
Speaker 1: medical doctor, somebody that does this professional professionally, and we
Speaker 1: finally got him. We got her blood and it was
Speaker 1: important that we were able to draw that blood at
Speaker 1: that time. I'm a pretty good patient advocate. I fight
Speaker 1: for people if I care.
Speaker 5: About them, I do.
Speaker 4: I do.
Speaker 3: Likewise, I just don't have the connections that you do.
Speaker 3: And thank God there are people like you and we
Speaker 3: appreciate it. Sean. My pet pee for the week is
Speaker 3: Scott Pelly and the commencement at wake Forest that he gave.
Speaker 3: It's amazing how these I don't want to call them
Speaker 3: what I think, but these people managed to weasele their
Speaker 3: comments in at such underhanded ways. It's like Springsteen and
Speaker 3: Scott Pelley and it's disgusting. It's still all false narrative.
Speaker 3: Oh you know, Donald Trump is taking away our freedom
Speaker 3: of speech. If anybody's taken away the freedom of speech,
Speaker 3: it's the liberal news and they just keep on there.
Speaker 3: I'd love to see these people start defending what Biden
Speaker 3: did instead of just knocking what Trump may or may
Speaker 3: not do. Let's give the man a chance. For we
Speaker 3: had to listen to their nonsense for for the whole,
Speaker 3: through the whole last administration, nothing but false narrative. I'd
Speaker 3: like that.
Speaker 1: I'm so sick and tired of these people claiming to
Speaker 1: be something they're not. They claim they are journalists. He's
Speaker 1: not a journalist. He is a liberal talk show host
Speaker 1: and he and he exposed himself for who he is.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like fake Jake Tapper. They all claim
Speaker 1: to be journalists, they're not. I've been saying this for
Speaker 1: years now. I'm a member of the media. They're members
Speaker 1: of the press. They're like I am. However, I'm honest
Speaker 1: about what I do, and we do straight news. I
Speaker 1: do plenty of straight news. I give a lot of
Speaker 1: information out you're not going to get elsewhere. We do
Speaker 1: investigative reporting. I mean, we're the ones that got the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion story right, the Paisa story right, the value
Speaker 1: evaluation tomar A Lago right. We're the ones that got
Speaker 1: you know that this whole trumped up charges pun intended
Speaker 1: you know, by Alvin Bragg was wrong. We're the ones that,
Speaker 1: you know, we got the issue of Duke Lacrosse right,
Speaker 1: and Ferguson Missouri right, and Freddie Gray and Baltimore right,
Speaker 1: and early in my career, Richard Jewel right. Because we
Speaker 1: take great pride in getting it right doesn't mean I
Speaker 1: haven't been wrong occasionally. You know, they're the one that
Speaker 1: covered up Joe's cognitive decline, not me. We were all
Speaker 1: over that story. And I think one of the reasons
Speaker 1: that people didn't listen to them and all their Trump
Speaker 1: hatred and the lead up to the election is because
Speaker 1: people don't trust them anymore. Absolutely, anyway, I do appreciate
Speaker 1: the call, my friend, so let not your heart beat trouble.
Speaker 1: America doesn't trust them, nor should they ever again.
Speaker 5: Eight nine four one. Shawn is on number right.
Speaker 1: That's gonna wrap things up for today. A Hannity investigation Tonight.
Speaker 1: James Comer wants to know who knew what when about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and his cognitive decline and the cover up
Speaker 1: that ensued. Also Mary Catherine hampt Head Cruz, Steve Miller tonight,
Speaker 1: Paula White will join us tonight, and Tommy Laren has
Speaker 1: set your DVR nine Eastern Hannity on Fox will see
Speaker 1: you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this
Speaker 1: show possible.