WEBVTT - Dan Wang Explains What China's Tech Crackdown Is Really All About

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe. Wi isn't thal so Joe.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pretty eventful summer here in Hong Kong. Yeah,

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's my impression. I guess sort of like

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>here too. But every everywhere that Chinese money has touched

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this summer, whether it's China itself, whether it's Hong Kong,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's US markets, has been quite a wild ride,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. Yeah, so obviously, um, being in

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg news room, it's been kind of NonStop this summer.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about the crackdowns of course that um,

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Party has announced on various sectors of its economy. Uh.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It started with targeting at financial back in October. There

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of theorizing about why ant lots of

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>people focusing on the data that AT controls. But then

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the summer it kind of just spun into a new

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>level of intensity and we saw China cracking down on

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for profit education companies. We saw it coming after d D,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the ride hailing app, saying that they had to you know,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>improve their labor laws and also that Beijing, the City

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of Beijing might actually take them over and kind of

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>make them a state owned enterprise or something like that.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's basically been NonStop and everyone is trying to

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out why now and what exactly is China trying

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah, that is sort of like the I

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>mean you just sort of listed all of these things,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and each one of them on their own have been extraordinary.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Like the d D thing was crazy. It's of course

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that's like they're there like uber type company, And wasn't

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that like that was like it like three days of

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>their U S I p O. Wasn't it like it

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>was literally the I p O like out of Tuesday

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or something, and then the following one day there was like, oh,

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we're cracking down. And then some of the companies like

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>these online are these uh private education companies, some of

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>which are listening to us, like their business models are

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like basically going to zero right there, like your band,

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>there's you can't do what you do. I don't know

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>if it's total zeros, but it has been extraordinary. But

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I still don't feel like I understand, like what is

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the the end goal here? Yeah, so I guess two

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>things on that topic. So you know you mentioned, Um,

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the d D crackdown happens soon after the I p O.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are pointing out that the seems

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like China is sort of shooting itself in the foot.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's going after some of its most successful companies. But

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, you know, a lot of what

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>China says it's doing is about improving quality of life.

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't want people to spend loads of money

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>on their education and have to be you know, really competitive. Um,

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't want well, it wants to protect workers rights,

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>um for for d D drivers and things like that.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>It wants to protect user data, you know, similar comments

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've heard in the West when it comes to

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Google. Right. So, but of course people are

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>very distrustful of those messages. Um. There's lots and lots

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of theories going around about what exactly is going on.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And today I am very happy to say that we

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to be bringing back a long time odd

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>lots guests. We're going to be speaking with Dan Wong.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a technology analyst over at Gavicale drab Eck Economics,

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course he's been on the show a couple

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of times, one of the best commentators in my opinion

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to China's tech sector. So really the

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>perfect person can't wait? Okay, uh Dan, welcome back. Well

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not for nothing, Tracy that Odd Lots is my

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast and Tracy my Joe my favorite podcast host.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Too kind. And so I'm trying to think, Um, where

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to begin? Um, why don't we start? Well, why don't

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we begin at the beginning? Um, you know the crackdown

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on Aunt Financial in October. What was your initial thought

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>about that one? Because I remember when when it happened,

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>people kind of thought this was an idiosyncratic event. Um,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was something specific about and Financial, an

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>offshoot of Ali Baba and which is of course founded

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>by Jack Ma and so people thought this was all

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about that one company and maybe that one person. But

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost a year later, it seems that there's

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a wider message here. I think the narrative has evolved

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>since the early days of h and Financial, when about

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just before the US election, the financials I p O

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was halted by the Chinese authorities. And so if we

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>draw the line from late October through to June and

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>now presently we're speaking in September. The first big shock

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was the financial I p O and then the second

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>big shock was the d D I p O. Has

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe mentioned, UM, you know, facing a fairly severe regulatory

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>crackdown in terms of having its app pulled from app

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>stores about a couple of days after its I p O.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I think when we thought about those two

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>events in isolation, um it was a really big shock

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and we wondered, you know, what exactly was going on.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But as this regulatory campaign escalated, as we saw more

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>industries get taken on, I think paradoxically, I think I

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>am at least a little bit more aware that there

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is um more of a regulatory theme around governing these

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>internet giants. And so if I wanted to, um, you know,

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 1>put things into different buckets, I would put the first bucket.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>The first bucket would be made up of UH and

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>financial and the D D I p O s in

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>which the Chinese authorities were highly reactive, in which they

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really control the timelines because these timelines were controlled

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>by the companies in terms of the I p O s,

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and so they had to crack down pretty quickly and

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard. And then I would cite something like, um,

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a second bucket made up of items, um,

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that are much better studied. Uh, and so in terms

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of something like the online education crackdown. But we've read

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>from the Chinese Ministry of Education is that the Ministry

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of Education surveyed around nineteen education firms, around seven hundred

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand children and then over hundred and fifty thou parents

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>before they issued these pretty traconian regulations that more or

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>less decapitated the online education sect. Or we can also

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think of other antitrust issues here that have affected companies

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like Ali Baba. We might also be able to think

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of some things like video games, in which President season

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Paying has been talking about video games for over the

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>last four to five years. So I think there is

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of, you know, maybe two or three

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>different buckets here. The first bucket are the purely reactive stuff.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a second bucket of antitrust issues prominently faced by

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba and mayelon camping. And then there's a longer

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>term issue with video games and online education, in which

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the party state has decided, well, maybe we don't like

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>these things very much. So already this was really helpful,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, obviously coming at this, looking at this

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>from an American American perspective, it's always tempting to try

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to draw analogies. And when you look at sort of

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>big tech in the US, you see a lot of

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>politicians on both sides of the aisle with their plants

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about Facebook and Amazon, they're kind of the complaints are different,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 1>some overlap, but there's, you know, complaints about the power

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that they have. And then you have a lot of

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>regulatory actions that take place in the US and Europe,

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and these lawsuits that never seek to that never really

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>seemed to amount to anything, like maybe there'll be a

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>big fine or a bunch of state's attorneys general like

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to one of the companies, and then four years later

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they have to make some change whatever, but it doesn't

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>really seem to do anything. Is the angst about the

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>power of tech slash big tech in China comparable, with

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference being that, well, they could do something about it,

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>whereas politicians and regulators here can't get their act together.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Or is the angst something different? I think it is

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 1>more a question of degrees. So first I agree with you,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the ferocity that the Chinese Party state um brought

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to bear on against these companies is you know, nothing

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like but the West, do you know? As best as

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, there are some irritating lawsuits that big

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>tech is facing in the US, and then some minor finds,

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhat big finds that they are challenging in

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the European Union. But there hasn't been a really really

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>substantial actions here, whereas the Chinese have acted much more severely. Now,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I would cite, you know, um, you know,

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the type of ankst that the Chinese have.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I would want to put a framework of maybe four

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>big slogans of the moment as well as one theme

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of the moment. And here I'm really drawing on the

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>work of my Dragonomics colleagues, and I think the four

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>big slogans that we've identified our first building the rule

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>of law, that this is something President se Jingping has

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about over the last three or four years, requires

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty comprehensive regulatory framework for dealing with a different

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>company needs. Second, I would cite dual circulation, which is

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>includes a theme to improve the functioning of domestic markets. Third,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say, um, there's something of family values here.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>In which the country just really want UM families to

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have many more children. And then the big theme that

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>we have been thinking about, the fourth slogan that we've

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about right now is something called common Prosperity,

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>which has really exploded in the pages of state media,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>which is, in our view, something reduce inequality as well

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>as social division. And so, you know, if you think

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>about these broad interlocking programs trying to make it easier

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>for families to have children, trying to make the marketplace

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that are regulated arguably more fair, to reduce these antitrust issues, UM,

0:10:55.520 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a common prosperity, which is uh means to

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, stop the wealthy from getting more wealthy, UM,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and then to improve I think what they call it

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is an olive shaped distribution and economic distribution that's shaped

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>like an olive UM. You know. I think the tech

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>companies are all implicated by each of these slogans, but

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that tech companies are the will be

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the only companies that will be implicated by each of

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>these slogans. I think right now the focus is on

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tech because tech companies are implicated by all four of

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>these slogans. Now, one more big theme is the idea

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that I think Beijing has decided that, well, we are

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>going to prioritize certain technologies over others. Now, I previously

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>worked in California, and I haven't always bought into the

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>idea that consumer internet companies like Facebook or Snap really

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>represent the peak of our technological civilization, that they are

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the shortest signs that we live in some sort of

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>technologically accelerating civilization. Sort of lamented that among my smartest

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>peers who have graduated from very good schools are much

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>more keen work in hedge funds or asset allocation or

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the consumer internet companies instead of much harder technologies. And

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this is something that has upset Beijing as well.

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, one very key line from a major speech

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>that Presidency gave last year was that, well, we can

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>tell that digitization is really important, as we've seen over COVID,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>but what we must never do is to lose our

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing sectors because the real economy is absolutely paramount. And

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as I've said multiple times on hot lots before, the

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government really wants semiconductors, semiconductors, white body aircraft, life sciences.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>These are much more the technologies that Beijing is targeting,

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think Beijing has sent this a signal, and

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>US in this case initiated a very severe cracknown to say,

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>online education. While we're not sure that's as important as

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>technology as for something, for example, something like chemicals video games.

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Children really shouldn't be playing too many of those, Um,

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they should be working in clean rooms for semi conductors instead.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm exaggerating a little bit there, but I think that

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more of the theme that China

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to do regulate the market better and then to

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>prioritize the right source of technologies. Yeah, and I remember, UM,

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days after one of the crackdown announcements,

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it was on the day, we did see

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese listed semiconductor stocks just absolutely spiking, So there was

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>almost a rotation out of consumer tech and into semiconductors. UM.

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And I have more questions about what exactly China is

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to do when it comes to its tech industry

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and overall economy. But before we get there, you know,

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned some of the key phrases from party speeches.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Common prosperity, disorderly spansion of capital has been another one

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's come up a lot, And I know you're on

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the record saying that you read a lot of the

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>party speeches, probably all of them, and you also go

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>through like all the party the official party reading materials,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the magazines they produce and things like that,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of investors don't tend to do that.

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So I guess my question is, like, should we be

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to party speak? Were there hints of this

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in party speeches or things that she had said previously?

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And do you think that the crackdowns are sort of

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>changing the behavior of investors in the sense that they're

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be paying more attention going forward? Cracy doesn't

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone read the party's main theory magazine, till Translation Seeking

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Truth as many of us do. Um Seeking Truth is

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a magazine that comes out twice a month. UM. Last year,

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I've read every issue and right now and still continuing

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the exercise. It's a beautifully laid out of magazine. It

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is features these thick pages, well printed pictures, uh, and

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the best writers in the party state.

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And every time I flipped through it, UM, you know,

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's always led by a major speech or major essay

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>by the General Secretary of the Communist Party C. Kinking

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in a fund that's distinct the rest of the h

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in the magazines. And so if you haven't had the

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>pleasure of holding one of these things, you know, I

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>recommend it just for the tactile experience alone. UM. So

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know I did read, um, you know, every one

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of MS speeches um Gintilshire last year, which isn't as

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>arduous and exercise as you might think. You know, one

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>speech every two weeks, which usually isn't terribly long. He

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>mixes a great deal of party speak along with some

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward and frank phrases that are easily compared priscible

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you know that is the signature style. It's

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not actually that much work, I think to engage with

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>one speech every two weeks, and I think this is

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>something that more of us should be doing. And really

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for me, the exercise that um, you know, for me,

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the meaning of the exercise is that it's really important

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to see what the party state engages as priorities at

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment. So for example, you know, if they have

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>five issues dedicated on party history, well you know, maybe

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they're not thinking about for example, you know, some other

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>big projects related to the environment, for example, and so

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>getting a sense of what the major priorities are. You know,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a decent way of getting there.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>It would be very reluctant to say that, you know,

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>reading all of the party documents, reading Kosha, reading the

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>People's Daily is an effective way to do uh investing.

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there are millions of these articles

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a day, can't possibly read them all. And there's also

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of noise, um mixed in with these signals now,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, when it comes to online education. I think

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what we found noteworthy was that President Senior Ping has

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioning this a couple of years ago. In fact, it's

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>published in his big compendium, The Governance of China, Volume three, UM.

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, this has been a signal for

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a while, and the signals really started to escalate over

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months. And so I think that

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is a place where we could have had a bit

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of a fairer warning. The state media gave us fair warning, um,

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>if we only chose to engage it. But that's not

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to say that, um, you know, we have to be

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>pouring over every People's Daily article. UM. But I think

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is worth keeping keeping in mind what's

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>going on, what the party is saying, what the party

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>is saying to itself, it's cadres UH and um, you

0:17:47.960 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>know the broader world. I think there's something interesting you said.

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that they took the survey. I think you

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 1>said like seventeen thousand education companies and that hundreds of

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>thousands of UH students. You know, the US is characterized

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as a democracy where there is a sort of direct

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>feedback mechanism between the voters and the government and theory,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and obviously China is not characterized as such. But these things,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>these actions that they take, such as going after the

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>education companies or such as going after video game playing,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>say various things like that to improve like family values,

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>as you put it, is there like this basic like

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of like feedback mechanism where even though there aren't

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>elections per se as we understand them in the US,

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you still have this sort of like either direct or

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>indirect response from the impulses that parents and families expressed

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>towards what gets UH turned into government law. There are

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>two mains of feedback mechanisms, UM that the party state

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>are really engages. UM. So First, it maintains these open

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>channels of petitioning where you can see um, you know,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>people usually elderly people lining up to know, voice their

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>grievances and then tell you know, the government, UM what

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're they're mad about. I mean usually these

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>things are higher prices of hects or higher prices of

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>gas or something. But you know that is you know,

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>one of these things that are out there. And then

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the other is UM that the party maintains these active

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, groups of people that are actively soliciting

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>people's opinions. And so this is UM. The survey was

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>something that the Ministry of Education announced, UM, you know,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>surveying seven thousand different parents. You know, I think it

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is something that's logistically possible by the Chinese bureaucracy to do.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm also aware that you know, for example, I currently

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>live in Shanghai, and I know that the Shanghai government

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>regularly hosts these grievance sessions just to tell them what's

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>going on and UM, you know what the problems are. Now,

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>whether this can be UM an effective replacement for democracy,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think absolutely not. Uh, you know, there's no mechanism

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>for poor leaders to be removed by the people. This

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is all done, uh, certainly all done by a party basis,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>But I think, um, you know, I would suggest that

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of very active surveys of public

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>opinion done by the party state, as well as active

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>solicitation of views by different people. This actually leads to

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the other big question about all of this, which is

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>why now. So you know, there are these different explanations

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for why China is embarking on these various crackdowns. Um,

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, perhaps quality of life explanations, perhaps solidifying control.

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But at first clients, it doesn't seem to make much

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>sense to be doing this in the middle of a

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>global pandemic, um, when the economy is relatively fragile. Um,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>China just sort of emerged from the trade war with

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the US, although plenty of people would say that under

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>President Biden relations have actually gotten worse between the U.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>S And China. So what's your take on why now?

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Because they could have gone after these respective industries, um,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>presumably at any time in history. That's a great question,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's something I scratched my head a bit as well.

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the first thing to note is that, um,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I think but the government realized last year over COVID

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was that, my goodness, a lot of people are using

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>online services, for example, for food delivery or for online education.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And for the most part, the Chinese internet space has

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>been I would say, pretty minimal regulated until basically the

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>last two three years. I think the over the last

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>five years. Um. You know, when I visited a bunch

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of tech companies when I was living in Beijing, you know,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they would often say that they are are fewer regulations

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>relative to the US and relative to every other industry

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in China. And so I think, you know, I think

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the most important impetus is that the government realized how

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>much more online everyone became last year in China. Probably

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>something like this happened in the US as well, um,

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>and so they can't let this be, you know, U

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>governed space for much longer. The other um, you know

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>why now issue is that I think, much more broadly,

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>my view is that China will not open its borders

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for at least twelve more months, potentially for many years.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's because COVID is still ravaging quite

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a few parts of the world and to Chinese don't

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>want to leave China right now, and so there's sort

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of not that many costs to China for maintaining its borders.

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Shots hit more or less fields. It can manage a

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of these problems. Um, you know, it's certainly not ideal,

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but it can manage them. And it's better than letting

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>COVID run free in Beijing, Shanghai and everywhere else. And

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>so you know, if you remove this idea that um,

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this constraint that you know, things can only be regulated

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>after things are really good, well, I'm not sure that

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they believe that there is going to be a much

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>better time than this. So again, you know, I'm lazily

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>reaching for the U S analogies here, but um, you

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>know you mentioned the first sort of the anti trust

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>aspect of all this and going after like the really

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>big companies, and I think like one of the sources

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of anxiety in the US is just simply that like

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there are the big internet tech companies in the US,

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and consumer tech companies represent a major or some power,

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and a company like Facebook, I mean it's kind of

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like a government. They have like a Supreme Court and

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>uh an internal checks and balances of what can get published.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how well, it works, but it exists,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's a perception that, say, like Mark Zuckerberg is

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as powerful as any other politician in the US. And

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if in that bucket of regulation, that too

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>is a source of the impulse in China, which is

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>just that whether it's Ali Baba, or and Financial or

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these other big ones, that this sort of

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>pure political power or pure power that gets accumulated by

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>some of these companies becomes big enough to rival the

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>state of the party. I think that's definitely underlying motivations

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>for this crackdown as well. What I wonder about is

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that I don't feel that there is a broad sense

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>among the Chinese people that the CEOs of the major

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>tech companies are as powerful as the politicians. UM. But

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly worth acknologying that the Communist Party cannot suffer

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>any perception that major business leaders are able to challenge

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>its authority. And you know, I think it was certainly

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>offended that Jack mob was so impudent as to insult

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the regulators UH Future Financial Forum. The positioning here is,

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of these underlying motivations. UM.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps these tech companies are UM you know, sort of

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the ponds of internal political struggles based on whose family

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>homes which firm. These are some things that we understand

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>not at all about UM. And I think from my

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>perspective from having lived in China for the last few years,

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is that this has been UM one of the main

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>narratives from UM, you know, foreign media about how why

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>there's been a tech crackdown, and I see a pretty

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>considerable discrepancy here. I think for those of us who

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>live in China are able to see the excesses of

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>these companies on a daily basis, companies like may Twin

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>or the online education companies or Ali Baba. Meanwhile, these

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>companies are celebrated elsewhere as UH having their crime as

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>being only being too beloved, and so I think, you know,

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that's one of these underlying factors opera. From a lot

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of people's perspectives, these companies have sort of been getting

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>out of hand, and they should be regulated quite a

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>lot more extensively, which the party state is doing. And

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to offer an example, I think, UM, a lot of

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the people, a lot of the parents UM I've spoken

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of the people around me would say

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that parents around them have been pretty happy about this

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>online education crackdown. These online education firms have become really

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>good at playing parents off of each other to engage

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in a zero status game to pay more for their

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>children while making um of children more miserable. I think

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them. What I see the government's efforts

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>is to do a coordination game UM to stop parents

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>from competing with each other, and then to coordinate parents

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>against their own children to make sure that they don't

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>play too many video games because now they can say, um,

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this is against the law. And so these are I

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>thinks some some of the other backdrops that are going on.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So when the crackdown on education or education tech um

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>came out during the summer, I remember there was a

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>bunch of commentary from people saying like this is so

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>unexpected and so extreme, you know, China basically coming out

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and saying that for profit education firms are no longer

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>will no longer be able to generate profits. That it

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>meant all of the China market was uninvestable. So I'm

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>curious to get your take about what all these crackdowns

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>actually mean for investment in various China sectors. And also,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know you mentioned semiconductors earlier. And we know that

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>China is very focused strategically on building up its semiconductor industry,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've come on the show and talked about that

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot. But I can't imagine that it needs

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to squeeze capital out of consumer tech in order to

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>get it into semiconductors. Um there must be plenty of

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>money sort of going into that already. So I guess

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the question is what does this mean for investment overall,

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and is this the best way to get more investment

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>into strategically important sectors. Probably not, is my gut answer,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's the way that the party state has decided

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to do things. I guess the best way I can,

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, think about that action is, you know, if

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you sort of just signal two investors online education, you know,

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you should not be deploying any more capital there. But

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe more importantly, I'm signaling to the country's best and

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>brightest in terms of the fresh grads. Now, I mentioned that,

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least when I was graduating from college

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>some years ago, a lot of people still wanted very

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>much to work in finance as well as a consumer internet.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, on the margin if the

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>party leaders UM, if the government is thinking well for

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the marginal student who can move from BETA and uh

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>teeing quiversities China's best university and UM to stop them

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>from going into consumer internet because they know that we

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Embijing don't like it anymore, and to go work on

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>much harder technologies like life sciences and semiconductors and aviation.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I think that is another one of their motivations.

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>You know. Michael Lewis in Liars Poker said that, you know,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>he thought he would get the marine biology students from

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State to pursue marine biology instead, but instead, after

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he wrote Liars Poker, a bunch of marine biology students

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at Ohio State wrote to him and said, how do

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I get off to Wall Street? Well, you know, I

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is a little bit of what the government

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is trying to fight back against with respect to what's

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 1>going on with investors, and I think certain types of

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>VC funds could be facing pretty considerable challenges to their

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>how they deploy capital going forward. But actually that that's

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:37.479
<v Speaker 1>been one of the questions I've been UM investigating, and

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in general, when I speak to these earlier stage funds

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>dcs and PE s They would say, well, you know,

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the crackdown has been severe, but so far it has

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>been limited to these UM segments, and the Chinese consumer

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>market is still very big. You know, there are things

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like healthcare, there are things like fashion, there are things

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like manufacturing of different goods that don't necessarily how to

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>fall a foul of party directives. And more importantly, for

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>folks involved in the industrial sector or the high technology sector,

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they're very pleased. Indeed, So I think these signals are

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>doing something to show, well, you know, stop the point

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>capital in UM technologies. We don't like, I'll go do

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it in semi conductors instead. Do you think there's going

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a sort of broader macro impact? Okay, so

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you mentioned the sort of sectoral potential rotation.

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some VC money reallocated towards the harder tech out there.

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there any sort of macro implication with trade flows?

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's interesting that the d D i p

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>O or the d D crackdown was right after a

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe that was the US listed i p O.

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's gonna be some change in terms of like

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>where the money potentially comes from. Are you thinking about

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>how this could affect China from that perspective. Yes, Um,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for now, I think it's a little bit too early

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to tell. But we've had someone like UM soft Bank

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>UM publicly wondering whether they should still continue to put

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>capital into China. And I think this is UM, you know,

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on the margin, one of these other things that are

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>making people much more hesitant to deploy capital into China

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>going forward. We have pretty regular pads from George sorrows

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>now and the pages of the Journal or the Financial

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Times to talk about why investors should be legally barred

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from investing. You know, there is this ongoing Holding Foreign

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Companies Accountable Act in the United States, which might dealist

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>all Chinese companies who don't comply with p c a

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>O b audits. So I think this is one of

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>these additional factors that are weighing on investor sentiment in China. So, Um,

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something else that I wanted to ask you.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>But one of the um things that keeps getting brought

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>up when talking about the crackdowns and China's macro economy

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is this idea of the German model, and maybe China

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying to pursue something like the German way. In

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the sense that there's particular German regulation UM that sort

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of tries to boost UM its manufacturing export sector UM

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and maybe limit some of its financial sector, although you

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>can argue they've done that with varying degrees of success.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, UM, when it comes to the economic model

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that China is targeting out, like how do you see it?

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the German model is a pretty good um yardstick.

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Came across a new term to me recently, Rhineland capitalism,

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, sort of this biddle way um

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Germans were promoting in the past, and I

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely see that China wants to do more with Germans.

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think at this point Germany is one

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of the very few Western countries today that have any

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>semblance of you know, positive, um warm feelings towards China,

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>mostly because there's a very big autos and industrial sector

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>making quite a bit of money here now, you know.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Being based in Shanghai, I spent quite a bit of

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>time talking with Germans. The German industry here really is massive,

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and they've taught the Chinese to do a lot of

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>different things, and the Chinese, i think, have repaid some

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the favor in terms of you know, outright talking

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>about how they want to be more like Germans, in

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of having more of an industrialized economy, in terms

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of having more mittel stand companies, which are smaller, medium

0:34:56.280 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>sized companies that are really great at certain industrial aisha uh,

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and then in terms of trying to build these vocational

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>schools to make sure that kids can still work for

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>great technology companies like fox Con instead of terrible technology

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>companies like ten cents and so I think there is

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of that sense going on, and

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>especially with common prosperity, maybe we have a bit more

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of a more even income distribution like how they do

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. So what are you watching for next? I mean,

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's sort of the question. Every It seems

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like every week or every day there's something new, some

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>new regulatory crackdown. I mean that was sort of what's

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>been striking about the last few months, just how it

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>just seemed to keep snowballing. What are the signpost or

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>areas that you're curious we might see further action. I

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>suspect that we won't have any more um sectoral decapitations.

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there will still be on some more things on

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the margin with video games. UM. It's possible that they

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 1>will cracked down further on things like real estate or

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>with healthcare. But this is UM getting I think a

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more speculative. I think at this point the

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>framework for a lot of regulations is now UM fairly complete. UH.

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>They passed the Data Security law in June and the

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Personal Information Protection Law in Hoggat A lot of this

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>framework is mostly complete. And I think crucially for investors,

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>now that we know UM what to UM that there

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is this you know, common prosperity, dual circulation, family values

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and rule of law initiative going on, you know, I

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>think we are we do have our expectations set a

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit further now. For me, the biggest uncertainty is

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going to go next with the Cyberspace Administration. This

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>is the c a C. And to me this is UM.

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>This is to me the most remarkable story of the

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>last UM while in which UM the c a C,

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which is a relatively new regulator and I know to

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>crucially a UM party organization that has arrogated to itself

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:10.399
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of regulatory powers. Now that Cyberspace Administration

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>UM c C is governed by the State Council, but

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a party organization that is a dual party

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and state organization, And the director of the c a

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>C is a vice director at the Propaganda Department, which

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most important party institutions there are.

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I think investors, now, are you know, dealing

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>with this very novel regulatory instrument that is now regulating

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I p O s, that is now regulating financial media,

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that is now regulating algorithms, And I have no idea

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>what is going to regulate X. And I think this

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of these big uncertainties. You know. I think foreigners,

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>foreign businesses, foreign investors are a bit more used to

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the sort of wildly state institutions like the National Development

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Reform Commission, the People's Bank of China or the Securities

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Regulatory Commissions c src UM. But you know, to be

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>directly regulated by a party institution, this is to me

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>very new and novel, and I don't know how to

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.839
<v Speaker 1>think about it. So this is another thing I wanted

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about, which is, you know, as the

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>tech crackdowns were unfurling, we did see a lot of

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>people talking about what this means for the future of

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the industry. So China is going after these big companies

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that are extremely well known, considered to be massive success stories,

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly they're sort of, um, you know, being

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>villainized by the state. What does that actually mean for

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>tech in the sense of entrepreneurial spirit and whether or

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>not people are going to want to go into that

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>sector in the future. That's such an important point to Tracy,

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think what, um, you know, the

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>worst outcome of this ongoing tech crackdown is that it

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>completely destroys the innovative and entrepreneurial spirit in China. Right now,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it is too soon to say on UM

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 1>what exactly will happen UM. You know, I would note that,

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, so far, when I talked to you know,

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>friends who are entrepreneurs UM you know, certainly not big

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>success UM like on the scale of jack Ma. What

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>some would tell me is that they would love to

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have the problems of jack Ma. UM. You know, that

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>means that they've made it really, really big. And for now,

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>China's UM crackdown has whenever it comes to a personal level,

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really targeted the most elite you know, dozen or

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.720
<v Speaker 1>two dozen UM figures that a lot of people can

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>identify on a billboard and that hasn't really destroyed. I think, um,

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the will by people to you know,

0:39:56.800 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>still a billionaire. I although um that that that they

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>may not be able to have any confidence in the

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>near term of what to do going forward. And again

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I would situate a lot of these things

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of a spiritual you know, almost a

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>civilizational values question in which I think the Chinese government

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is accepting that not all types of entrepreneurial hustle is good.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I think now that you know, China is sort of

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>living through its own guilded age. Um. Many people have

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>said this. Uh. And in the guilded age, you know,

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of hucksters and fraudsters out there.

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is a little bit of what

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Beijing wants to control. And so if it has to

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>suffer some erosion of general entrepreneurialism, well, I think it

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is saying that you can't make profits by uh say,

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>creating financial risks as financial and P two P loans.

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>We're doing, in its view, monetizing status and anxiety and

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>miserating students through online education, or by destroying the eyesight

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and UM the free time of children through video games. Now,

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a lot more of what Beijing

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do to lay down UM guardrails or

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.839
<v Speaker 1>these no go zos, UM you know, go play everywhere else,

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but these things are off limits. Well, Dan, you've given

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 1>us another excellent overview of all the things that are

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>going on in China, and of course it is quite

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot at the moment. So thank you so much.

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Dan, that was great. Always joy, Thank you so Joe.

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's always really great to have down on the show.

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's so much to take away from that conversation. UM.

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that sort of stuck out to

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 1>me is this idea, and I don't think a lot

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of people outside of UM Asia necessarily understand this point,

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>but like the degree to which big consumer tech is

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>actually embedded in China is just on a different scale

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to where it is in the US and the UK. Like,

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, everyone uses Facebook, everyone uses Google and Amazon

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, but you know, in China, like

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we Chat, um and financial like these apps are basically

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>like one stop shops for living to the extent that

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like the government has to work with them. UM quite extensively,

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and and so from that perspective you can kind of

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>see why the CCP would view this as a problem.

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:56.399
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like de facto privatization of government functions. Yeah,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a pretty interesting question, and I

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hadn't thought that about that. Oh when you said, like, well,

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of a weird type of correct out

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of still, you know, an ongoing pandemic.

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And Dan's point, it's like this was kind of a

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>wake up call perhaps to the government of just how

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>just how online the population is. I mean, obviously the

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>size of these companies have been sort of known for

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a while, but perhaps it was driven home or greatly

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>appreciated the degree to which, and you know, it's kind

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of the same here, you know, the degree to which

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these mega tech companies become the best arms

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for services. I mean, I think, you know, it's like

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think back to last April or March, there were

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things you couldn't get, but you could,

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>like you could always order something from Amazon throughout the

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>entire pandemic. And so the degree to which large tech

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>company has become like this sort of like lifeline is

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sort of fascinating thing totally. Well, the other

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that just struck me is I found it very

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>useful his like bucketing of these like different things. So

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 1>there's like the anti trust aspect, but also just this

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>idea of like family values. And you know, it was

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting to hear him describe some of the feedback mechanisms

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>that they get. And I remember it was like a

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>few years ago. It was like one of those like

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>five year plans or something. It was like, wasn't it

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like better growth not faster growth something like that. Wasn't

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that some cliche that was going around? Yeah, And I

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 1>feel like some of the things you talked about, like

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>making it easier to have families, or making it easier

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:24.919
<v Speaker 1>for parents to tell their kids to not play video

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>games on Monday through Thursday because it's against the law

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or it's going to damage their eyesight or whatever. It's

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>like feels like perhaps in keeping with some of these

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>other like sort of like promises and priorities that the

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>government has laid up, Right, So those promises and priorities,

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they were being taken on in the West,

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, if you saw the United States government

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really tackling the antitrust issues with big tech, or if

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you saw the government actually cracking down on the high

0:44:56.280 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>cost and competitive nature of education, you could see like

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they might actually get some support. But the difference between

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 1>China and the U S system seems to be about

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>how these things are actually getting rolled out. So you know,

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in China, you can wake up um on a summer

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>day and suddenly the government is declaring that education firms

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are no longer going to be able to generate profits.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Whereas in the States, if you actually got something like that,

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:26.839
<v Speaker 1>and of course you know you would never get something

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>as extreme, but if you had a measure that was

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of targeting education cost, it would be going through

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>layers and layers and layers of government bureaucracy and and

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>so you would have it sort of well flagged in advance.

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's probably one of the key differences here,

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not necessarily what they're cracking down on, but

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the extremity and the way they're doing it. Yeah,

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the speed and ease and the sort of unilateral decision making,

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>because right you could never do it Affen And I

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>really do wonder whether there are people in the US

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on either the right the left, and I think there

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are who look at what China has done, especially with

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 1>some of the big tech companies. It's sort of like

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 1>admiringly thinking like, oh, you know, we've been wanting to

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>do this forever. There's no mechanism because we could never

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>agree on passing a law and there would be like

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a million layers of courts and regulations. Has sort of

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like wishing they could emulate the ease with which China

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>can do some of these things. Yeah, I'm sure there

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are some parents out there who think that limiting the

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>amount of time people or kids can actually play video

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing. All right, shall we leave it there?

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there. Okay. This has been another episode

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Why Isn't All? You can follow me on Twitter at

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwork. Follow our guest on Twitter, Dan Wong, He's

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:52.959
<v Speaker 1>at Dan w Wong. Follow our producer Laura Carlson, She's

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>at Laura M. Carlson. Followed the Bloomberg head of podcast,

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, And check out All our

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast at Bloomberg, under the handle at podcast. Thanks for listening.