WEBVTT - Lots More on How TikTok Options Traders Got Quiet

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, we have been in a leather jacket.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well it's not just a leather jacket. It's a

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 3>black leather blazer with sort of braided edges. It's got

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a wait, is this an insult

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 3>or a compliment? I don't know, a little bit of

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a Ren fair Field.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, that's a big to a volatility nerd. That's a couple.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, good, all right. I was a question.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 4>This is like one of it that would be a

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 4>very polarizing not to me.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I do not have renfair vibes. But look, I respect it.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 2>These are renfair time, These are fair times. I get it.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. There's pictures of me on Twitter in you know,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Nightingale armor with his swords, So I think this is

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a fair game.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 2>I did a deadlist.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm both the most popular trader and most successful trader

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 3>at Citadel. That is going viral, barges.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>This isn't after school special.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I've decided I'm going to base my entire personality going

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 3>forward on campaigning for a strategic pork reserve in the

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 3>US Black Goal. These are the important questions that robots

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 3>taking over the world.

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 4>No, I think that like in a couple of years,

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 4>the AI will do a really good job of making

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 4>the Odd lotch podcast. One day that person will have

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 4>the mandate of heaven.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 3>How do I get more popular and successful?

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>We do have.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to lots More where we catch up with

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>friends about what's going on right now, because.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Even when the Odd Lots is over, there's always lots More.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 3>And we really do have the perfect guest.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 4>We are, of course with Ben Eiffer qv R Advisors.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Then who's been getting steamrolled the most by this market?

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 4>And I have some thoughts on this market, but I

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>want to hear your No.

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a super fun market. I mean really, First you

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>had the deep seak thing, yeah, right, and that was

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because equity markets went down, but the fund

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was all under the surface, right, what did we sell

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>off eight or ten percent? And index? It wasn't a

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>huge deal, but there were like eight standard deviation moves

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in market, neutral factor type relationships and crowded equity long

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>short and so you saw you know the type of

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>people that had the really popular equity positions. You'll Nvidia

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know Tesla and all these kind of stocks

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>just get really really murdered. You heard of a lot

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of pain at the big multistrats. Again you have to

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>put that in context because they're pretty well risk managed.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>The losses weren't that large in percent terms, but you

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>had again just very very very large moves. And then

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the interesting thing about that was that led

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of d risking in hedge funds. So

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you had pretty high gross in net leverage coming into

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that and then it came off quite a lot, you know,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of d risking. And then when you know

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>that when Liberation Day hit, I think positioning wasn't nearly

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know, as offsides as it could have been otherwise.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>And so you did see obviously big drawdowns in the

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>equity market and big rallies back a lot of volatility,

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think, you know, the losses that you saw

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>among head funds probably weren't as bad as they would

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have been otherwise. Another interesting thing to note, and we

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked about this a lot. There really

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't that much of the kind of super crowded short volatility,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>short tail risk, tail risk selling kind of stuff out

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there that there was, like in twenty nineteen twenty twenty

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for the pandemic. So you didn't see that those kind

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of fireworks right there. Weren't like hedge funds getting liquidated

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and people getting carried out in body bags and big

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>auctions of all their positions making markets go crazy. You

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>just didn't really have that kind of stuff. What you

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>had was a pretty fundamentally driven, you know, orderly sell off,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>followed by you know, goofy rallies back and forth on

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump tweets and what's he going to do and all

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing. But it was really, I think

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>much more about about you know, fundamentals of expectations of

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what is policy really actually going to be and how

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>much does that matter for the economy as opposed to

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>like technical positioning hedge fund blow ups and people getting steamrolled.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel like the positioning point is really important

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 3>and is probably one of the reasons like we had,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing air quotes here, but that orderly sell off

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>versus something super super chaotic. But that said, I mean

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about it being a fun market. I feel

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 3>like I have to make the obvious disclaimer, which is,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it's very fun if you're in options and

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 3>in volatility trading. But if you're in the sort of

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 3>long term buy and hold game, this feels almost like

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>an impossible environment to navigate, right, Like one day we're

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>up two or three percent, the next day we're down

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 3>two or three percent. Everything is riding on like what

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Scott Besson says, what Lutnik chooses to say, and god knows,

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>you know what Trump is going to say in his

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 3>latest press conference very much so.

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and in today too, it's like, well,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>yesterday we were up three point two percent and then

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a bunch of walking back of the unilateral

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>terra production position, and then we sold off, you know,

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>halfway back to flat almost immediately. I think there were

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I think someone.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 4>By the way, we're recording this April twenty fourth, it's

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 4>ten oh eight am.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Every time we have a Yesterday.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Or something that's right, very good point, keep going yeap,

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So we had I think just this morning I saw

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an article I think Alexander wrote it at Bloomberg saying,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're in a traders are trying to trade

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump tweet's market, and that's really hard. You know. I

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>think that generally speaking, anybody that you talk to the

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>success rate of sitting there at your computer and looking

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>at what just got tweeted or what article just came out,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and then sort of doing trades and making money, Like

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody makes money at that. It's incredibly difficult, right, It's

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a very choppy market. The people who do, of course,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as you point it out, volatility traders have a very

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>non consensus view on what's fun and what's not right.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>We love this, but yeah, I think that's.

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Your definitions of fun may vary.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Exactly back to the renaissance fair point.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 4>So, I thought there was a very interesting point about

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 4>deep seek, which is that what it really obliterated were

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 4>the market neutral factors that had been working on. That

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 4>is very interesting, And of course, you know the pod

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>shops that we're always talking about, their game is to

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 4>find those market neutral and then this was a thing

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 4>that just rearranged everything.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you're on.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Before you talk about the TikTok option influencers who are

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 4>always looking at various Greek letters like alpha, beta, Gamma, delta,

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Epsilon's zeta, ata, theta iota, Kappa, lambdamu when oopsilon is

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 4>trading way out there on some extreme all these trades

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 4>are premised on some sort of mean reversion that there

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 4>isn't a dislocation, and then eventually a normal returns, right.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 4>And it may go further out and the sigma and

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 4>the row may get further blown out, but eventually they

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 4>come back to normal. How much of this is like

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 4>a crisis of people really don't know that some sort

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 4>of fundamental economic mean reversion is coming.

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's something really important to that, right.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that people are very conditioned in this market

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of the last many many years, really post credit crisis, right,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of nothing ever happens. We talk about

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this a lot, right, but that any kind of sell

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>off will be immediately bought, It'll immediately come back, any

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of all spike will get sold. And you know,

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>even in the pandemic, obviously people got run over on

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that view, but we still did come back. It's just

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that it got really crazy for like a month, right, Yeah.

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think this feels very different, where this isn't

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a flat in the pan with a technical squeeze and

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a big explosion of stuff like this is. You know,

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>there are the real fundamental issues here, which is that

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the US government is out there doing totally

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>crazy economic policy that every economist in the world for

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the most part, will tell you is totally crazy. And

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they're also changing the goalposts day to day on what

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly that policy is going to be, and they've really

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>eroded the market's confidence that they kind of know what

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, not only on tariffs, but I think on

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>everything else now, right, I think that one of the

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>most important things that Liberation Day did was, you know,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>take the market, which really up to that point, I

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think you have to say, kind of believed that the

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>tariffs thing was like this four dimensional chess strategy and

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>negotiation and everything else crazy that Trump was saying, you

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of discount, right, because he's not really going to

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. He's got a plan. And really the market

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>really had to re rate that whole expectations of how

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to interpret everything that Trump and his administration say or

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>say they're going to do, because gosh, they said they

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>were going to do this crazy tariffs thing and then

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they did it five times crazier than everybody thought they

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>were going to do. Yeah, right, and not just crazier

0:07:58.200 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of levels of tariffs, but in terms of

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like the clownishness of implementation, right that like the chat

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>GBT night before tariff table with the Penguin Islands and

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like the whole thing. Right, So then when Trump is

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>out there saying, Okay, tomorrow, you know, next week we're

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>going to deport thirty million immigrants or like whatever crazy

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that he says, the market kind of has to

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>take that more seriously now, right, or at least question

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>like what are the possible implications? And so I think

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a very different environment going forward, right, It's unlikely

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to just change and that he's going

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to suddenly turn into like a really serious guy.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>So, speaking of things being weird, and there are any

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 3>number of weird things that we could choose to talk

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 3>about here, but like one of the weirdest to me

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 3>has been what's been going on in equity volatility. So

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 3>we've had a very big gap between the VIX, which

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>is implied volatility versus realized volatility, which you know, like

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 3>maybe explain the difference to us just to begin with,

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and like why we've seen that gap really developed?

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Sure? Absolutely, So the VIX is up is something that

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody talks about, but not everybody really thinks about exactly

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>what it is, right, it's the fear index. But what

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>it is is it's a level of what's called implied volatility.

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So in some sense you could think of it as

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the market's forecast for realized volatility over the next month

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>based on option prices. It's a little bit more nuanced, though,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>because calculation that they chose for a VIX isn't regular volatility.

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It's something called variance, which is volatility squared but then

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>normalized back into units that are volatility. And the distinction

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there is that it's so the level of VIX is

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the level of what's called the variance swap, and a

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>variant swap pays you, as a volatility trader who buys

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it proportional to the square of volatility. And so what

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>that means is if volatility doubles, you actually make a

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>whole lot more money, or if volatility goes up by

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>four times, you make a ridiculously amount more money. Yea's right,

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a big slope to it, and so you have

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to pay a big premium to buy a variant swap

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>relative to what you would pay to just buy volatility.

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>And so when you compare the VIX to realize volatility

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or how much markets are moving on average. On average,

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>there should be an extra premium there. It's not just

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>direct comparable. Now to Tracy's point, though, realized volatility recently

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>has actually been generally much higher than like the average

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>level of the VIX. Now, the VIX did spike into

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the fifties kind of briefly, but it's mostly come back

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>down into like the thirties and high twenties. But yet

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>markets are often moving you know, three percent in a

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>day or four or five percent in a day, which

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>implies a much higher level of implied volatility.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a crazy chart. So you can you can chart

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>on the Bloomberg on your handy Bloomberg terminal, like the

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Gamma index versus the VIX. You could see that like

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 3>the jaws kind of opening over the past few weeks.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very much so. And again that's really reflects a

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, aggressive bet on the part of market participants

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that realized volatility has been high, but it's going to

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>be lower over the next month than it was, and

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it's and actually the degree to which you see that

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in your chart is understated because of that variant swap effect.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>You're actually not really even comparing the right number with

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the right number to compare would be like at the

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>money implied ball, which you can also plot in Bloomberg.

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 3>Oh what's the ticker for that?

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So you would just do SPX index and then you

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>would do there's going to be a field for it,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which would be like one month, one mt h something

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>something field.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, oh awesome, Yes, this is very useful.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. There you go, And that guy will usually

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere between say three and eight or ten points

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>below vix, depending on the level of X. So with

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>VIX at fifty, that's probably at forty or thirty eight or.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 3>Something like that. You know.

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Tracy and I we put on events, trivia events, et cetera.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 4>One of the dreams that we have though, is a

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg terminal live company competition terminal Olympics where we get

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 4>like twenty traders and they're all seated at a terminal

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 4>so good calculate actually, and they always flashes on a

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 4>screen who gets the answer first?

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 2>Like, how well do you know?

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So that would be such a good tea.

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 4>I think we think Ben for coming on if nothing else,

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 4>to give us quotes and news about functions for when.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>We eventually put this on.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't follow like you know, the Wolf of Gamma

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 4>or whatever on TikTok you've seen anything good?

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying they got?

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They all got real quiet?

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing out there? You got any good?

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Like tweets or you know sellers or whatever.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, so as you know, like on a regular basis

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.119
<v Speaker 1>in normal environments, like everybody is tagging me in ridiculous

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like tweets or Instagram posts or whatever that that these

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of option selling influencers are making, you know, the

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>coal options grind guy and like all these people. And

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as of you know, a couple of weeks ago, there's

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>just absolute crickets from that community because the types of

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>trades that you know, they they advocate, as we talked

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>about last time, you know, they make a little bit

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of money on average, you know, for a while, and

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then they give it all back or twice as much

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>back when something like this happens. And so there's not

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of talking coming from that crowd, and

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you see it reflected. You know, obviously you can't see

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what you know is how happening to those highly over

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>leveraged individuals that are unfortunately following that kind of advice.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can look at how well like covered

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>call ETFs are performing relative to just the underlying and

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>things like that to get a little bit of of

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a sense. You know, look at

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the mstr covered call ETF for example, right, And it's

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>just bad because the worst possible environment for those kind

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>of strategies is when you have a sharp spike in

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.599
<v Speaker 1>realized volatility, and especially if there's like a lot of

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>chop and back and forth, you know, mean reversion, right,

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>because you'll have a situation where where they're selling like

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>these weekly options, right, and you have a really big

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>sell off for a week, they lose a bunch of

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>money on their puts, and then they sell some calls

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have the big rally back, and then they

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>lose their money on their calls. And again, none of

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this is like something that they explain to their followers.

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>They just sort of tell their followers that the income

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of the strategy is like the option premium that they sold,

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and they don't conceptualize the possibility that you can actually

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>lose money when you sell the option.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Tracy, every once in a while, I'm reminded that we

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 4>exist in world where there's like fourteen ETFs.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 2>That are based on various doing things.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Micro strategy is crazy amazing anyway, Sorry, well, also.

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm still blown away by the fact that micro Strategy

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 3>also calls out the volatility and its share price in

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 3>its earnings call as like a selling point.

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Look how volatile we were in circuits and it's beautiful, right,

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But I mean Sailor is very smart, right, so Sailor

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>understands all this stuff perfectly. If you if you can

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>run a really really high volatility company, yes you can.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It means hedge funds love your convertible bonds and will

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>pay anything to get your convertible bonds. Yeah, it makes

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>your actually makes your credit cheaper.

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>And I gotta say, if people want to hear more

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 3>about this, we did record a lots more with Matt Leveeh.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a great episode.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 3>God, it feels like so long. It feels like it

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>was two years.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>We get the.

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Luxury of talking about micro strategy for a whole episode once.

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Pretty amazing.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like this is kind of the secret of

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 3>volatility and options trading, which is like you think that

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these guys, a lot of these influencers

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 3>would really enjoy this particular trading environment, but so much

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of it is based on that mean reversion that Joe

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 3>pointing out that a lot of stuff just blows up

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>when you finally get volatility right, it really does.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Wait not to come back to this, but MSTR. But

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>did you see that there is going to be MSTR

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>for Solana?

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, and they're yes, they're trying to I was.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 4>I actually appeered on a crypto podcast recently and I

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 4>was like, I'm tapping out this.

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand MSDR.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 4>But now there's a bunch of like copycats, and the

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 4>question is can anyone really repeat this?

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but GSR just led a big round and to upa.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I just have to read these. Sorry, I have one

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>more question, but I just before I do.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Here's some of the ETFs Defiant daily target two x

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 4>long MSTR ETF yield max MSTR Option income Strategy ETF

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 4>t REX two two x long MSTR daily target ETF

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 4>bit wise MSTR income Strategy. Oh there's another one st

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 4>key day, one hundred percent MSTR and one hundred percent

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 4>coin TF. So I guess it makes us some coinbase

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 4>in there.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot more. I just had to read those

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>in last question for me, Like, if you're.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 4>A long only investor, just a normal whatever investors I am,

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 4>you know you have two choices I think, which is

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 4>one the hope and praise strategy, which I always actually

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 4>think is very legitimate because that does tend to work

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 4>out over a long enough timeline. Or they're like, oh,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 4>I really need to think about diversification strategy or something

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 4>like that. Okay, in your world, don't you still have

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 4>to have some sort of view because if the question

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 4>is do some of these Greek letters snap back into

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 4>place or there's a gap between where this Greek letter

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 4>and this Greek letter are pricing to make money, don't

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 4>you still need.

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>To have a view like I do.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. So there's a couple of different

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>important things here. There are different types of trades in

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the derivatives world that are driven by dislocations. Some of

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>those trades make money on realized dynamics and markets and

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>don't rely on some implied Greek coming back into Okay, right,

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>so Tracy was talking about, you know, realized volatility and

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>implied volatility. This is like a simple dumb example, but

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>just suppose that implied volatility was just always way too low,

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and realize volatiley was way higher for short term options.

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You would just buy short term options and hedge them

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and you would just make money constantly. Yeah,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and you wouldn't need that to ever change. Wouldn't ever

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>want that to change. You wouldn't ever want that dislocation

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to go away. Okay. So there are some things like

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that that we can make money based on a dislocation

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>but without requiring the dislocation to close. And then there

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are other things where exactly as you point out, you're

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>trading an implied dislocation and you're going to only make

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>money when it reverts. And for things like that, you know,

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we really have to think hard about, Okay, where is

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this dislocation coming from? What flows are driving it? Are

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>those flows that are going to be persistent and not

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>go away and it's unlikely that those dislocations close. Are

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>there fundamentals that actually cause that dislocation to stay there

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>even if it doesn't really make sense? Or is this

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>something that is being driven by temporary supply and demand

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>dynamics in the market and you understand what might push

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it back over what kind of time horizon? And the

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>latter is an interesting trade. The former really isn't, And

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you actually have to think very hard about that. You

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>can't just look at the level of the Wazoo parameter

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>on a screen and sort of say, which, by the way,

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is the made up parameter that exotic derivatives traders you know,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>use to claim why you're losing money on your trade

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with them.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Man, I'm always looking at those parameters. That's a big mistake. Okay,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Well I have a very simplistic question based on this conversation.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 3>But okay, implied volatility down quite a bit, realize volatility

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 3>is still up quite a bit. Is buying vall that

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of hedging protection? Is that cheap at the moment? Like?

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Would you be a buyer at these levels? Basically?

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you believe as I think I do, that

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump two point zero is not a low volatility president,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.479
<v Speaker 1>right that one way or another, Right, this is different

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And that doesn't mean the world is going to end necessarily,

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but that this is not like a ten percent realized

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>volatility market, and he doesn't want it that way, he

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like it that way. Then yeah, I think you

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have to look at when you look at the overall

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>volatility landscape, there are a lot of things that are

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>relatively cheap, and you know, in our core business we're

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>absolute return. We're always looking for what's cheap and what's expensive,

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, hedge trades and so forth. But we

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>also do help big institutional investors with tail risk hedging

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and with things that are outright defensive to protect their portfolios.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, there's still lots and lots of opportunities for

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that because really in this market we talked about this

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but the knee jerk reaction of most

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>market participants is that when volatility goes up, they just

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>think you have to sell it, and they do a

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of risk on trades in the volatility markets, which

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily make sense, you know, from a risk reward perspective.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Most of the time, they should just buy equities, to

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>be honest, if they want to be bullish.

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Actually, you just reminded me. I mean, one of the

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 3>other things we just saw was like this huge contraction

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 3>in risk appetite across the entire financial industry basically around

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 3>April second, that Liberation day. Who is selling vall at

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 3>the moment, and have you seen continued appetite to sell

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 3>volatility in the current environment, yeah, no very much.

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So, so one thing that you can always tell is

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>when you get a sell off like this and the

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>VIC spikes a lot. So VIX went to a little

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>over fifty. Look at where the front month Vick's future

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is trading, and that tells you whether people are buying

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>or selling ball. So the front month VIX future had

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, five or six days left to maturity early

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>after Liberation Day, and it was trading at you know,

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>thirty two when the VIX was fifty, right, So it

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>was implying massive speed of normalization and mean reversion because

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody's selling it. And the VIX future is the best

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>thing to look at because it's the tourist instrument, right,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, vall traders, you know, trade the VIX

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>inasmuch as there's dislocations in it. But if you're just

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a regular equity guy and you think ball is too high,

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't go trade options. Options are too much work.

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>VIX is really easy, right because you can trade the ETFs,

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you can trade the futures. You don't have to think

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>about like the gamma and the you know, the baga

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff, and so there's an overwhelming appetite

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to sell ball on ball spikes from a lot of

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>parts of the hedge fund community, from tourists, from volatility

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>tourists within the hedge fund community, and from retail investors. Also,

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>retail investors are very much dip buyers and ball sellers

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on spikes.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 4>Valdi tourists would be a good name for a trivia

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 4>team one of our trivia nights.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Volatility that is a good A good name,

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>be a fun one.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Lots More is produced by Carmen Rodriguez and dash Ol Bennett,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 4>with help from Moses Onam and kil Brooks.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Our sound engineer is Blake Maples. Sage Bauman is the

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 3>head of Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Please rate, review, and subscribe to Odd, Lots and Lots

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 4>More on your favorite podcast platforms.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>And remember that Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all our

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>podcasts ad free by connecting through Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening.