WEBVTT - The Big Problem With the Modern Electricity Grid

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, I feel like we have already done kind of

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>one episode or maybe multiple depending on how you define them.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know, we're understanding the incredibly complex, opaque, crucial

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>world of how electricity markets work in the US and

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>what's good about them and what's bad about them.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 4>We just got we gotta do more.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 3>Here's what I've learned from multiple hours.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 2>This top serious summary.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>It's complicated, No it is, but that's it. And also

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>also actually I'll add one more thing. It seems to

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 3>be kind of the worst of multiple worlds. Like in

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>a sense there's a lot of regulation, but in another

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 3>sense there's a lot of deregulation. In one sense, you

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>have these dominant players. And I have to say a

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of this is informed by my experience in I

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 3>guess New York and Connecticut where you have con Edison

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 3>and then ever Source, and so you have these big

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 3>players that you have to pay a lot of money

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>to in terms of distribution, but then if you want,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 3>you can go out to an independent energy supplier and

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>pay them for the actual electricity that is going through

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 3>the pipes or the wires of con ed or an

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 3>ever source. But it never ends up making a difference

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Speaker 3>as far as I can tell, because the distribution costs

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:43.279
<v Speaker 3>are still so high.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think the part about it that

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 2>like why it feels like a mess intuitively, is this

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>attempt to essentially create a market on top of something

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that we know is a natural monopoly, right, because obviously

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to have like multiple companies or ideally

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it makes sense. Maybe it does to

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>have multiple companies like running their own wires and distribution.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we all sort of get why there is

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 2>this natural monopoly aspect, But then of course you try

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to introduce market aspects and so different producers whether it's solar,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>whether it's nuclear, whether it's coal, whether it's natural gas,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>whether it's wins, et cetera, are kind of in a

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>market and it depends. So I think in Texas there's

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>probably different than Virginia versus Tennessee.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>That's the other thing. There's state by state differences.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, Texas there's a lot of competition where you can

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 2>basically just do whatever you want, and whoever is the

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>cheapest price at any given moment, that's who is supplying

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 2>the power. So you try to like overlay on top

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>of this natural monopoly some sort of market ish thing

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 2>where different people compete, and then of course you have

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the issue of because it's not a market. These utilities are,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, heavily regulated, constrained on what they can invest,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>constrained on what they can price, constrained in the connection

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>they can link between their own investment and say renewables

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 2>versus then capture during that with higher prices, and everyone

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 2>complains that for whatever kind of energy they make, the

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 2>system isn't working.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Well yeah, but I think you put it perfectly. It's

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 3>like imposing market forces on a natural monopoly, and it

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 3>just seems like there are some downsides to that model.

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to put it that way. Downsides for consumers

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>and then downsides in terms of maybe the transition to

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 3>decarbonized energy.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>And this is the key thing we are putting. There's

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>so much riding at stake of the power system, right

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>because obviously we're attempting to take the old model that

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>was in place for decades and then replace a lot

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 2>of the generation sources with zero carbon versions, whether they're

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 2>solar or wind or maybe nuclear, though there's not a

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 2>ton of nuclear construction, but that is one attempt. Then

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>there's also booming demand for the first time in decades,

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and this is something we have talked about in the

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>context of AI data centers. Tracy wrote that great post

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>recently just talk about how like every question on analyst

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>calls now for these companies is basically demand from AI.

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh it was crazy. I looked at the transcript for

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Dominion's most recent earnings call, and I think there were

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>like five or six questions asked, and four or five

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>of them more about data centers. And Dominion's doing a

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 3>bunch of interesting things, but people only want to hear

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 3>about data centers at the moment totally.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So you have two really novel things. You have the

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>decarbonization effort and you have the increase in load growth

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they call it for the first time in decades.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 2>And so it's like, are the markets that we've designed,

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 2>this combination of natural monopolies with some sort of market mechanism,

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>do they work for all this? And I think the

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>jury is still out to save the minimum.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I am ready to confirm my prior that this whole

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 3>space is very complicated and I don't quite get how

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>we ended up with this particular system, So let's do.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 4>It all right.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm psyched to say that we have two perfect

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>guests to sort of help us understand how we got

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>here in these markets and what the flaws might be.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be speaking with Matt Huber, who is

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a professor at Syracuse in the Department of Geography and Environment,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and we're also going to be speaking with Fred Stafford.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 2>He's a pseudonymous energy writer who works in a separate industry,

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>but he's someone who's writing I have enjoyed for a

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>long time. I've learned a lot from and so we're

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 2>disguising his own voice so that he can keep his

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 2>professional life and his writing life separately. So Fred and Matt,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for coming on outlaws.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for having me, thanks for having us. Happy to

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 5>be here.

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>So why didn't I just start with the simple question?

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 2>You two have been writing in various places at at

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>piece recently, and I think Damage magazine and Jacobin and elsewhere.

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Why what is it about the nature of electricity markets

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that you feel like you have to write about and explain.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 5>So I love to answer the question why electricity hy

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 5>electricity markets because for me, as kind of a stem

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 5>brained person on the political left, I got excited hearing

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.679
<v Speaker 5>about things like nuclear power and that seems really important

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 5>and really necessary for climate issues and so on. And

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 5>what I found was that inlectricity, once you start looking

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 5>at like why isn't there more nuclear power, you quickly

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 5>run into this fascinating domain in which central planning runs

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 5>right up against all these markets and this really interesting

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 5>tension of some things are planned some things or markets,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 5>why is it like that? And then what I also

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 5>saw on the political left is that nobody really was

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 5>talking about this. There wasn't really any clear analysis of

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 5>why there wasn't more nuclear power or anything, because I

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 5>think a lot of this sort of discussion was really

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 5>guided by kind of environmental politics. So that's really what

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 5>drove me into this as like an intellectual subject.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 6>Also, when you look on the political left, there's tendency

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 6>to kind of fetishize the kind of like smallest beautiful

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 6>vision of small scale decentralized energy generation, and when you

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 6>look at the scale of the climate crisis, and how

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 6>much we need to build and how much we need

0:06:55.800 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 6>to transform. That vision of decentralized energy sits well with

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 6>kind of decentralized markets and price signals, but it doesn't

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 6>really sit well with the need for centralized planning for

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 6>large scale building and investment and to try to deal

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 6>with the kind of load growth that you both mentioned

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 6>at the top, and so the smallest beautiful visions seemed

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 6>to be totally out of step with the kind of

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 6>large scale challenge we have in front of us and

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 6>trying to kind of think through how we could reform

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 6>the electricity system to meet that challenges. I think why

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 6>we got into this topic.

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to ask the obvious question then, which

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>is how did we end up with this system? Because

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 3>my understanding reading some of your work is that there

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 3>was a time in the early nineteen hundreds where we

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>had very centralized, very regulated power companies utilities basically, and

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 3>then later on in the century we moved to this weird,

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of pseudo deregulated market where we had independent operators

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>plus the regulated utilities. How did that transition actually happen? Like, basically,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>walk us through the history of the US energy industry

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>in under twenty minutes, preferably.

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 6>You know, it really does go back to early twentieth

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 6>century where a lot of sort of progressive lawyers and

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 6>progressive political thinkers sort of realized there were these parts

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 6>of the economy that were seen as sort of essential

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 6>services like water, like gas, like railroads even that were

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 6>sort of not really best left totally to the private

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 6>sector and totally to the market, and that are better

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 6>sort of regulated as public utilities because there's a fundamental

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 6>kind of public interest in making sure that those utilities

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 6>are kind of running smoothly and offering those essential services.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 6>And pretty soon when electricity came on the scene, it

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 6>became pretty clear that electricity was one of those essential

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 6>services before it came under the domain of public utility law. Now,

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 6>the problem was the sector of electricity was controlled by

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 6>capitalists like people like Thomas Edison and others, and eventually

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 6>like Samuel Ensall, who wanted to run the system for profit,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 6>and that kind of tension kind of played out for

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 6>a while, but eventually they realized that, okay, doesn't make

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 6>sense for society to have multiple competing electric distribution companies

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 6>sort of laying wires against each other. So what we

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 6>really need is to actually have a single electric utility,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 6>and the industry sort of fought and compromised to make

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 6>sure that that electric utility would be run by a

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 6>private investor owned utility. They'd be given a monopoly franchise

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 6>over a given territory, and in exchange, they would be

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 6>regulated by public utility commissions, which we still have in

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 6>this country. They still regulate your distribution utilities, and they're

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 6>supposed to regulate them for the public good, for the

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 6>public interest, make sure these private utilities aren't like gouging consumers.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 6>And so that created a kind of compromise or utility

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 6>consensus that lasted throughout much of the twentieth century. And

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 6>these sort of monopoly regulated utilities. You know, they built

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 6>the grid. You know, if we talked today about the

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 6>return of load growth, there was a lot of load

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 6>growth in the post World War two era, and they

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 6>developed this model where their investments were regulated and the

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 6>prices they charged to consumers were regulated. But they were

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 6>really effective at at building out the grid and building

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 6>out generation transmission distribution. Now by the nineteen seventies they

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 6>started to come into disfavor. There was, as many would

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 6>call it this kind of shift towards neoliberal ideology where

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 6>really all the kind of big hulking institutions of the

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 6>post war era, like government and unions and utilities were

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 6>seen as kind of inflexible and not competitive, and we

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 6>need to kind of really smash these institutions and deregulate

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 6>them and break them into smaller and competing parts. And

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 6>so at that point you get this long process of

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 6>trying to break up this utility system that again used

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 6>to be run by a single entity and they could

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 6>use central planning, they could really invest with long term considerations,

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 6>and then you break it up, and as you both

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 6>talked about in the introduction, now we kind of have

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 6>competition and generation. You have all these different independent power

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 6>producers that are competing to sell electricity onto wholesale markets,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 6>and the wires, the transmission and distribution still tend to

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 6>be owned by utilities, but they've also found ways to

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 6>insert competition into the retail side, where consumers can have

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 6>so called choice over things. And so what they've done

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 6>is kind of broken up this highly integrated and complex

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 6>physical system called the grid and broke it up into

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 6>parts where they can subject it to competition and markets

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 6>and price signals.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Now, this is where we kind of.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 6>Reached this in pass where where if we really want

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 6>to totally restructure the grid, totally grow it in ways

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 6>that can serve decarbonization and AI and all this stuff,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 6>that perhaps, like maybe this sort of more integrated, more

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 6>central planning, more coordinated and socialized investment model could be

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 6>more useful than this very scattered and sort of fragmented

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 6>system we have now.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 2>So Fred, why did you jump in? Because, as you

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 2>said in the intro, you got interested in nuclear power,

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>and in your view, the current market model is not

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>amenable to the scale of nuclear power expansion we need,

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 2>and we know that there's hardly any building. I think

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>there was a new reactor last year, but was incredibly slow.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 2>What is the core flaw of putting nuclear into the

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>existing electricity model?

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 5>The major issue is that nuclear is this extremely capital

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 5>intensive infrastructure that costs so much, and it produces very

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 5>cheap power once it's built, where the operational expenditures are

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 5>very low, and it does so in a way that

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 5>is just sort of constant. It's not flexibly moving like

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 5>power increasing and decreasing. It's just sort of dumping twenty

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 5>four to seven what people call baseload power out into

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 5>the grid, and because someone has invested so much capital

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 5>in this thing, to recoup the costs, they have to

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 5>run this and try to get revenues twenty four to

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 5>seven max capacity. Unfortunately, the way that revenues are assigned

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 5>and for power generators in these sort of restructured areas

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 5>that are really dictated by marginal prices. At any given

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 5>unit of time, the price of electricity on the market

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 5>is the price of the marginal unit, which often tends

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 5>to be a price of natural gas. Sometimes it's even

0:13:58.320 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 5>close to zero because there will be a lot of

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 5>renewables at that particular time and place. But you kind

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 5>of lose the guarantee that you can recover your costs,

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 5>you being the owner of the nuclear plant. So it

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 5>just makes it very hard to know you're going to

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 5>recoup that investment. It means that all this wind and

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 5>solar energy, which is at any given time might be

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 5>on the grid, maybe isn't, but when it is, it's

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 5>bringing down the market prices. So it basically just disturbs

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 5>this way that nuclear and hydro electric power, pumped hydro

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 5>storage facilities, all these big, big infrastructures were invested in

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 5>in the way they recouped costs, and because the utilities

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 5>had this sort of cost of service regulation where the

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 5>idea is they would invest in the infrastructure and they

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 5>would get a profit on the capital investment. They'd be

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 5>allowed that roughly nine to ten percent profit. But the

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 5>total costs for everything that they had invested in and

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 5>were spending to run the electricity system to provide electricity

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 5>service to customers was being socialized to those customers. When

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 5>you don't have that model, the revenues are less guaranteed.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 5>The revenues are just whatever the market revenues are. And

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 5>there's just various reasons why that competition from the other

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 5>forms of energy and the way the prices are set

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 5>according to whatever the marginal unit of power is, it

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 5>just doesn't work well for these big power projects.

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Wait, can you give us a specific example of a

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 3>utility that might be doing something or have more money

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 3>to make renewable energy investments. I'm sort of leading you

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>on here, but one thing that you mentioned in your

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 3>writing and going back to our intro, is Dominion building

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 3>its own ships to install wind turbines. And that was

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of stunning to me. I hadn't heard that before,

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>So talk a little bit more about like the concrete

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>examples of utilities maybe doing this at a larger scale

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 3>than some of the independent operators.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I love the dominion example. Well, I think

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 5>it's so interesting, and we do open our recent essay

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 5>with that. So let's say you're a state and you're

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 5>a state that has democratically determined that you want offshore

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 5>wind to be part of resources that the state is using.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 5>That a result of some kind of democratic process. People

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 5>might agree disagree with that, but that was a state

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 5>policy aim. Now, if you're the state of New York

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 5>and you want offshore win, you say, all right, we

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 5>have some power markets already, but that's not going to

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 5>be enough to attract any investors in this massive, massive

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 5>capital intensive project that's long term infrastructure. So instead, we're

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 5>going to design we the state, are going to design

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 5>increasingly bespoke financial policy instruments called the Offshore Renewable Energy

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Certificate as a subsidy, and we're going to force all

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 5>the utilities, like the con ads and your utility you're

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 5>paying goes to to have to purchase a certain number

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 5>of these instruments. These certificates, so that it's kind of

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 5>socializing the cost of the subsidy among electricity consumers. But

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 5>now we've designed this new kind of financial instrument. We

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 5>are augmenting the existing power markets with this as a subsidy.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Because the power markets weren't enough to attract investors. Then

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 5>we're going to design the competitive auction process to take

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 5>competitive bids. So we say, please, please somebody, Oh my god,

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 5>we want offshore win. Please someone come and build it.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Here's the subsidy on top of the power markets. And

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 5>whatever forecasted revenues you think you'll make based on your

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 5>forecast of the market price, you get to keep whatever's

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 5>left place your bids. We want to procure it, and

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 5>we'll see which one offers the best price for us

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 5>the state. Now that is the kind of deregulated or

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 5>restructured market approach this. Now let's look at Virginia, which

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 5>has Dominion as an investor owned public utility. Virginia passes

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 5>legislation we want offshore win. They then just task the

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 5>public utility to build offshore wind Dominion. Then it doesn't

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 5>need to No one needs to design all these additional subsidies,

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 5>These additional markets or auctions or anything. Now, the State

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 5>Public Utilities Commission just needs to be working in tandem

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 5>with Dominion Energy to kind of approve whatever investments they

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 5>think are needed, determine what's prudent of those investments, what

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 5>they're allowed to socialize to the customers. And they have

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 5>such a scale it's actually the largest of all the

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 5>Atlantic Coast offshore wind projects by a fairly large margin.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 5>And because of the economies of scale here, well that

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 5>you mentioned the ship. One of the major kind of

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.719
<v Speaker 5>supply chain issues that offshore wind projects are facing is

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 5>there's not enough ships. Because there's this law that Jones

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Act from one hundred years ago that says it's a

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 5>common Yeah, everyone mentions it, and everyone just acts like

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 5>there's no legitimate basis for that. I'm not going to

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 5>make that argument. That's a fact regardless. So there's not

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 5>a lot of ships. So Dominion just says, Okay, we

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 5>know we can recoup the costs of all this stuff

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 5>because we're a public utility, a regulated monopoly utility. So

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 5>we're just going to build a ship. And just a

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks ago that ship was built and it

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 5>sailed out of a port in Texas. It's called the Shribda. Yes,

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 5>like Scilla and Shribdis, you know, questionable sea monster naming

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 5>for your offshore win vessel. But now they can keep

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 5>this project going despite what kinds of cost increases there

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 5>are with supply chain issues and so on, Whereas in

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 5>New York State, a lot of the contracts that were

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 5>the results of these competitive processes had to be canceled

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 5>because supply chain problems and other issues meant that the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 5>projects at the agreed upon contracts and subsidies were no

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 5>longer profitable, and the state said, wholloa, we're not going

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 5>to let you renegotiate the price. We're canceling it. Rebid later,

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 5>all right, So what are the people of New York

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 5>left with? Then?

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Tracy and I were just talking earlier today about how

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 2>the Jones Act has probably now come up on like

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty episodes, but we've never actually done a proper Jones

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Act episode, and now I think we'll just never do one,

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>so it can be this running joke of never having

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>done a Jones Zach episode. Matt, I want to go

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>back to you. You know, you said something that certainly

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.479
<v Speaker 2>rings true to me. In fact, I brought up recently

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>on another episode, do you say the political left pushing renewables,

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the certain the fetishization of the smallest beautiful. I sort

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of put it as like the more bucolic forms of

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 2>energy solar and wind. But what is the problem with

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 2>relying on solar wind? Because as far as I can tell,

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 2>when I look at charts, and especially when you augment

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 2>them with batteries, it looks like we're installing more and

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 2>more and more. Why is that not the path? If

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>we're installing more under the existing market structure, why is

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 2>that not the path towards decarbonization decarbonizing the grid?

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's certainly part of the path in one sense.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 6>We are trying to figure it out. But the intermittency

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 6>issue is still an issue. You know, it's you know,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 6>you'll see headlines like once I remember the UK and

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 6>the Financial Times that it was like sixty six percent

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 6>of the energy was coming from wind one week, But

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 6>if you read the whole article two weeks before that,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 6>two percent what's coming from wind?

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 6>And so there are challenges to what they call firming

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 6>that intermittency, and you know, you can do some with

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 6>lithium batteries. Those batteries can only last about four to

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 6>eight hours, so there's really still a challenge of long

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 6>duration energy storage that we're still told we're sort of

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 6>a couple of years away from. But obviously solar and

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 6>wind are going to be part of the decarbonization equation.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 6>One thing our writing has tried to point out is

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 6>that because of this deregulation process, and because of very

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 6>specific policy on the part of the United States to

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 6>incentivize renewable energy production with tax credits, it's virtually ensured

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 6>that all the solar and wind development, nearly all, is

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 6>being developed by the private sector and by these independent

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 6>power producers who are sort of dislodged from the old

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 6>utility system. So one issue we have is that the

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 6>large majority of solar and wind development, independent power producer

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 6>development are kind of just these capitalists who are separated

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 6>from the kind of social good of the utility system,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 6>where they kind of have to sort of, again like

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 6>the Dominion case, justify their investments to a public commission

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 6>and kind sort of try to integrate their investments into

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 6>a sort of larger public infrastructure. No, they're just scattered

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 6>capitalists trying to compete with each other to sell renewable

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 6>energy into the grid, and as Brett Christopher's book has

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 6>pointed out, you know, it's actually quite hard for these

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 6>sort of scattered renewable producers to actually make profits on

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 6>these complicated wholesale markets. So we think solar and wind

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 6>that's going to be a crucial part of the equation,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 6>but unfortunately the investment model for it so far has

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 6>been more aligned with these quite chaotic and quite fragmented markets.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 6>And so trying to plan a whole sort of decarbonization

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 6>of the whole grid would really be about trying to

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 6>integrate solar and wind with nuclear and geothermal and long

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 6>duration storage, and that again requires a much more central planning,

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 6>much more of this kind of socialized investment model. And

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 6>I would just add on to what Fred said earlier.

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 6>The utilities do have a socialized model of investment, which

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 6>is really what you need if you want to grow

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 6>the system rapidly, but they socialize it through the rate base,

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 6>through rate payer financing, which is actually kind of a

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 6>pretty regressive form of financing because it's coming from the customer.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 6>And that's one reason why you're not going to find

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people who love their utility and sort

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 6>of really love getting those utility bills. So we actually

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 6>advocate that the most progressive way to finance this kind

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 6>of investment, in the socialized way would be more towards

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 6>progressive taxation and actually, you know, taxing the rich more

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 6>to actually fund this kind of essential public infrastructure that

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 6>really all of society needs. And it shouldn't be that

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 6>the poor are paying the same rates as the rich

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 6>and that's what's financing our decarbonization of electricity. We should

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 6>have a much more progressive sort of tax approach to

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 6>that investment.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 5>I'd like to jump in on this question of renewables

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 5>and why not have them. I think sometimes if you

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 5>advocate for big things like nuclear, you can be put

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 5>in a box where you're a NeuPro you hate renewables,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 5>And that might describe some people, but for us, our

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 5>concern is that by restructuring the entire way that the

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 5>electricity sector is organize and the way revenues are accrued

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 5>and all that in finance in the interest of supporting renewables,

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 5>that's what we think the problem really is. It's not

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 5>so much the fact that they're there, it's the fact

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 5>that things are being reorganized to promote them, and then

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 5>let's just kind of ignore the fact that it also

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 5>has led to an explosion of natural gas power everywhere.

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 5>Because when you have these markets, if you're forecasting some

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 5>high wind output and then high wind output doesn't come,

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 5>something changes. You need a really liquid market of traders

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 5>and others who are ready to jump in and produce

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.239
<v Speaker 5>the power and sell to whoever was banking on that

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 5>wind power to be there. So it's like the desire

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 5>to integrate them at such a huge scale is what

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 5>brings the restructuring that we're saying is maybe not the

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 5>wisest thing.

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, this was like a light bulb moment for me

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 2>at some point because I remember at the start of

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>my career, I remember the Pickens plan and T. Boone

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Pickens was like this big start advocating all this wind,

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>and I like, I didn't really get it because I

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 2>was like, I thought you were a fossil fuels guy.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Why are you advocating wind? And only years later did

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 2>a click that this idea of natural gas as the

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 2>compliment for wind and that when the wind isn't blowing,

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>then you're gonna need T.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Boon's natural gas.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 2>But this is one of those things that took me

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 2>many years to understand, like why it was him that

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>was advocating so much wind power.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess in retrospect it was obvious, Yeah, but

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't gonna Yeah, And I was reading the piece

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 3>that Matt and Fred did, and I think there's an

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 3>estimate in there that companies contracting for renewables in fact

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>draw between twenty percent and fifty percent of their annual

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 3>electricity from the regional grid, partially from fossil fuels like

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 3>nat gas that you just mentioned. So, you know, we've

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 3>gone through the sort of downsides of the current model,

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 3>which seems to be this weird combination of both regulation

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 3>and deregulation. How would you design a system such that

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 3>it moves away from where we are currently, Like, what

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 3>would the ideal system to address some of these issues

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 3>actually look like?

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 5>To you?

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 6>It sounds almost like too nostalgic, But part of me

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 6>wants to say, we really should just return to that

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 6>model of public utility law and regulation of the electricity system,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 6>because again, I think we've kind of lost touch with

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 6>what it took to build a grid and build a

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 6>society like we did in the twentieth century, and it

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 6>was very clear that electricity was this sort of underpinning

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 6>societal scale infrastructure that was sort of foundational to modernity

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 6>and foundational to the thriving of all of society. And

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 6>so we really thought, like, okay, for the public good,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 6>we've got to sort of plan and charge one single

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 6>into the utility to kind of take control of that

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 6>system and plan its investments to integrate it for society.

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 4>And then, of.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Course, once the grid was built and once all that

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 6>growth of the post war era was starting to stagnate,

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 6>people kind of became disillusioned with that model, right, But

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 6>we are in a different context here in the twenty

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 6>first century.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 4>We have to return to growth.

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 6>And you know, in the post World War two era,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 6>the utilities had something they called it the grow and

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 6>build strategy because they knew they could actually make profits

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 6>on actually growing their investments. And that was a real

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 6>specific strategy. The more they invested in the grid, the

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 6>more they could get profits and get their investments sort

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 6>of approved by the public utility commissions. But we are

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 6>back right here in twenty twenty four. We're back to

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 6>a need to grow and build a grid, and we

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, some say we got to triple it or

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 6>quadruple it, and to do that we need a totally

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 6>different institutional model of investment, and the public utility one

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 6>it worked, you know, and you know, again I've mentioned

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 6>Brett Christopher's book again. You know, if the problem is

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 6>that renewable energy production is not profitable and these scattered

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 6>independent power producers can't make profits, well, one thing about

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 6>the utility model is the whole system was about guaranteeing

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 6>profits to the investor. It is guaranteeing a rate of

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 6>return on investments that were approved again by the Public

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 6>Utility Commission that has to kind of look at the

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 6>utilities books and open them up and kind of evaluate

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 6>whether or not the investments make sense and whether or

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 6>not the rates makes sense for the consumer. And so

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 6>it seems to me that was a really good model

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 6>in terms of growing.

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 4>The system and investing in the system.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 6>And not many people, I think are thinking today about

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 6>returning to it. But I think that's because a lot

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 6>of the people talking today have forgotten what it takes

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 6>to build a societal scale infrastructure like we did in

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 6>the middle of the twentieth century.

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Just to play Devil's advocate on this point, how would

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 3>you address the problem of regulatory or political capture in

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that scenario, because this came up in the early twentieth century,

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 3>which you already sort of touched on. But when I

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 3>think of the electricity system in a place like Connecticut,

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of it seems to be ever sourced going

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 3>to its regulator and saying, WHOA, we need to raise

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 3>rates and distribution costs because we're going to make billions

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 3>of dollars worth of investment in renewable energy or in

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the grid or whatever. How do you avoid that particular

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 3>risk because this seems to be what actually bothers people

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 3>when it feels like there is a monopoly and they

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 3>can basically raise prices as much as they want.

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say one thing to keep in is

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 5>that competition versus monopoly. This isn't Amazon having a monopoly.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 5>This isn't Google having a monopoly. This is a regulated

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 5>monopoly where the retail prices and the investments are happening

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 5>in accordance with some kind of nominally happening in accordance

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 5>with some kind of state public process. With regulatory control,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 5>you might even have commissioners who are directly elected in

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 5>some states and other places they're appointed by governors. But

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 5>we would never say there's no such thing as regulatory

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 5>capture and corrupt dealings with the utility model. As we

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 5>mentioned in our recent essay First Energy, a utility in

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Ohio has been just embroiled in this horrible scandal where

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 5>there was like bribery with the government to support certain

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 5>initiatives they wanted. I mean that stuff does exist, But

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 5>what I would say is that generally we need more

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 5>public interest in the goings on of the public utilities commissions,

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 5>journalism around what's happening there. I mean, there's a reason

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 5>on your show you're talking so much about clean energy

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 5>growth and decarbonization. This is a mode of politics that

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 5>is increasingly pretty prevalent, pretty significant, very high dollar volumes

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 5>of investments being discussed, and I think it warrants a

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 5>kind of renewed democratic focus on exactly these sorts of things.

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 5>But also I would say that the opposite model, just

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 5>increasing competition doesn't mean you don't have like giant market

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 5>power and political dominance. The largest renewable energy developer in

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 5>the country's next era next era is this big company

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 5>that has subsidiaries that are public utilities, like Florida Power

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 5>and Light. They're being market competition doesn't mean you don't

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 5>have these giant firms that then for all that regular

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 5>vanilla reasons can kind of influence politics the way they've

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 5>always been able to. So it's not that like utility

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 5>means that, and competition means pure, beautiful price, natural price

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 5>competition and so on.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 6>And it's also that the private model itself, like we

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 6>we try to make clear like we think the utility

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 6>model is preferable, But the ultimate, I think problem is

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 6>in the early twentieth century, we did decide that we're

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 6>going to hand over this crucial public infrastructure as a

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 6>monopoly to private capitalists who ultimately are answerable to their

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 6>shareholders and want to seek a return on their investment

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 6>above really the public interests, and they're regulated for that reason.

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 6>But ultimately, I think that was kind of at the

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 6>root of a lot of our problems that we have

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 6>with utilities, because they are they do seek profits above

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 6>the public interest, they do capture the public utility commissions,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 6>and they are correct. So that's why in a lot

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 6>of our writing, we really do think ultimately the ideal

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 6>model for us is public ownership of this public utility, Right,

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 6>Why are we handing over public utilities to the private

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 6>for profit sector. Why aren't we doing something like the

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.719
<v Speaker 6>Tennessee Valley Authority and like these again against the kind

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 6>of left smalls beautiful kind of community scale, local scale energy.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 6>We like to think about this sort of big public power.

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 6>Examples of the Tennessee Valley Authority that you know is

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 6>not running their utility for profit, is planning that utility

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 6>area for their public mission of serving their customers and

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 6>also of decarbonization. They have really decarbonized their generation to

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 6>a significant degree. They're not done yet, but they're developing

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 6>new nuclear which is not happening a lot in the

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 6>private market, as we've talked about. So that kind of

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 6>model of public utilities where it's actual public ownership, I

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 6>think that's the best way to avoid those kind of

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 6>problems you have with the corruption and the kind of

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 6>graft and the private utilities.

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you brought up the TVA because I wanted

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to sort of make sure we hit on that. I

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 2>remember first learning about the TVA probably in high school

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 2>when we like did some you know, section the New Deal,

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and then I sort of just forgot about it and

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 2>in my mind, I only think of it in I

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 2>had context, But then I realized it's actually still a

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>thing in the almost it looks like the entire state

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 2>of Tennessee or Almost get their power from the ten

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 2>See Vlidy Authority. What was special about the TVA and

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>why is it sort of like loom so large when

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 2>they teach school kids about the new Deal? And how

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 2>does it operate today?

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 3>What is it like?

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Is it okay, here's a federally owned electric utility, talk

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to us, like, is it actually delivering on the promise

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of what you both claim that can happen under the

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 2>publicly owned model?

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 5>I am so glad you're asking this question, as perhaps

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 5>the political lefts number one defender of the TVA a

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 5>uniquely positioned to answer it. So as I was saying earlier,

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 5>like we need a mode of politics. Decarbonization so important,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 5>clean energy growth is really important. There should be a

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of public attention on the investments and the actors

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 5>involved in that. Well, back in the Great Depression, that's

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 5>exactly what was going on the kind of major corporate

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 5>villains of the day were the public utilities holding companies,

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 5>these massive organizations of capital into these like pyramid entities

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.919
<v Speaker 5>that controlled electric power utilities across the country. So when

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Franklin Roosevelt FDR was running for office, first in New

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 5>York State and then for a president, really he kind

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 5>of cast the public utilities as these major villains and

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 5>as electricity as this key to modern living that everyone

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 5>was entitled to and that large parts of rural America

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 5>were not getting. So the TVA came out of that

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of political context. You have the Great Depression, you

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 5>have a administration that was really interested in big, bold,

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 5>new experiments to address crisis, and the TVA was sort

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 5>of this way of adopting a model that was first

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 5>sort of starting to be set up in New York State,

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 5>where FDR was governor beforehand, in the New York Power

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 5>Authority of saying, hey, here's all this federally owned river

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 5>systems where the federal government has control for navigation and

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.919
<v Speaker 5>other reasons like that, let's try to develop this part

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 5>of the country by focusing on controlling the devastating flooding

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 5>of the river. There was a nitrates production facility that

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 5>was being built for World War One that was kind

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 5>of being disused that was attached to a hydro electric

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 5>power station on a dam on the Tennessee River, and

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 5>so that was a key resource that the TVA was

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 5>being built around. But ultimately it was kind of a

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 5>regional planning to develop that economy and bring modernity to

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 5>an impoverished region which was like stricken with malaria at

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 5>the time, and as I said, lots of devastating floods.

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 5>So that was how the TVA came about. But it

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 5>really was simultaneously about this kind of attack on the

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 5>private utilities companies. I mean, we say it's kind of confusing.

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 5>Public utility is the notion of like a regulated utility,

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 5>but you know they're not publicly owned necessarily. So the

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 5>TVA very quickly became kind of a weapon, an aggressive

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 5>attack on the utilities to try to deliver cheaper power

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 5>for electoral reasons, but also just to help develop the

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 5>economy and bring more power to to people there. Bonneville

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 5>Power Administration in the Pacific Northwest was built up for

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 5>the exact same reason and the exact same model. FDR

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 5>had a dream of having four different areas of the

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 5>US would have such systems. But it really was like

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 5>this fascinating time where it was kind of build up

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 5>this deeply technical, institutionally complicated, technically complicated system like within

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 5>the state, have bureaucrats and kind of wonks like figure

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 5>this out and build this and put people to work

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 5>doing it. And the fact that it survives today in

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 5>a kind of different form. Today, it's really more of

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 5>just a I mean, it's not just a but is.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 5>I like to think of it as it's America's major

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 5>state owned enterprise as a power company. But it still

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 5>does have some kind of regional environmental stewardship goals that

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 5>it has to satisfy and it has to look after

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 5>the river systems and so on. But yeah, it's really

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 5>from New Deal experiment and regional development bringing modernity to

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 5>the masses. Fast forward to now state owned enterprise that

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 5>is a political instrument in some sense.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 6>Their slogan was electricity for All. It sort of sounds

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 6>like a Bernie Standers slogan, and you know it was

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 6>because the private capitalist utilities didn't see it as profitable

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 6>to serve everyone, right, And it's that commitment to this

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 6>electricity system is this essential public service and that everyone

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 6>should be able to have it. And again, just to

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 6>go back to today, I mean, there's all this realization

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 6>that we need a lot of growth in electricity.

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 4>But there's also some data centers and AI.

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 6>Producers who sort of think like, well, maybe we can

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 6>just build like a big micro nuclear reactor for our

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 6>own data server, like in sort of dlink from the

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 6>grid entirely right, And I think that kind of notion

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 6>that we can just sort of hunker down and produce

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 6>our own electricity isolated from the system is a real

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 6>danger in that TVA model of like, really, we need

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 6>to build a system that is for everyone, something we

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 6>need to bring back.

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Bright and Matt, thank you so much for coming on, oddline.

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I believe I am marginally closer to understanding a bit

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 2>about how the grid works and how he got here.

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 2>So really appreciate you both coming on.

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much.

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks a lot, Tracy, I really enjoyed that conversation.

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 2>I think to start, the simple thing between this and

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the Brett Christopher's episode we did is that the uncertainty,

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 2>the lack of off take, etc. It clearly seems like

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a real issue. We know we need the power, we

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 2>know we want power from decarbonized sources, Yet the at

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 2>least as of now, the market systems don't quite seem

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 2>to satisfy all things at once, right.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Brett described it as that sort of toxic

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 3>mix of a huge outlay, a very big investment for

0:39:54.640 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 3>generally a low expected return, with a dash of volatility,

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 3>an uncertainty over what electricity prices will actually be, and

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 3>so the model just doesn't work for financing a lot

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of these things.

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting too, because when we talked to Brad,

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 2>obviously it was in the context of the constraints on

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 2>ongoing renewables growth, But that makes a ton of sense

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 2>to me with nuclear, Right, if the entire thing is

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 2>like the assumption is that once you turn on the

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 2>plant and it's constructed, it's supposed to run forever or

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 2>decades and decades. But if you have periods where the

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 2>sun is very shiny for a long time, or there

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 2>is a tremendous amount of wind and they're literally getting

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 2>zero revenue during those periods, you could see why. You know,

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 2>people talk about the environment and we forgot how to

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 2>do this, and maybe there's some thing, but maybe it

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 2>simply does not pencil out to make such a gigantic

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 2>upfront commitment.

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, I think the other thing that sort of

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 3>touches on is I do think, you know, I can't

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 3>remember if it was Matt or Fred who was talking

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 3>about like the need for more of a democratic focus

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 3>on this particular issue, but I do think it kind

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 3>of touches on I guess an innate sense that a

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of electricity consumers i e. Almost everyone in America

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 3>actually has at this point in time, which is going

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 3>back to this idea of sort of the worst of

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 3>both worlds where you have like these big utilities who

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 3>are charging you know, a lot for distribution, and then

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 3>you have the independent power generators who maybe are more

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 3>competitive in their pricing, and then you have the financialization

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 3>of energy markets combined. And it doesn't seem to be

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and I think there were some stats in the research,

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 3>but it doesn't seem to have actually brought down electricity

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 3>costs that much. And then secondly, it doesn't seem to

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 3>have delivered on the transition to renewables or decarbonized energy

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 3>at scale at the scale needed.

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was interesting because just now you said

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 2>electricity consumers, which of course we are, but the industry

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 2>doesn't even consider us consumers. They call us rate payers,

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 2>which I think is a very telling thing that the

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 2>consumers of electricity, unlike in every other market, are not

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:15.320
<v Speaker 2>considered consumers. We're considered rate payers. And I think it

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 2>speaks to exactly your point that there's this sort of

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 2>pretense of a market system for energy, but at the

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, we're not like say, consumers of

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 2>cars or soda or sneakers were ratepayers of electricity.

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we are beholden to the power of electricity. Ooh,

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 3>power of electricity. There we go. Shall we leave it there?

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guests Fred Stafford He's at Fred Stafford DCS

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and Matt Huber at Matt Huber seventy eight. Follow our

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 2>producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol Bennett at

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Dashbot and kel Brooks at Kelbrooks. Thank you to our

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 2>producer Moses ONEm And. For more Oddlogs content, go to

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 2>bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots were have transcripts, a

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 2>blog and a newsletter. And you can chat about all

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of these topics twenty four to seven in the discord

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 2>with fellow listeners. Go to discord dot gg slash oud.

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 3>Lots and if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 3>it when we do deep dives into the system of

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 3>power provision in the US, then please leave us a

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 3>positive review on your favorite platform. And if you enjoy

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 3>odd Lots, if you like it when we get into

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 3>the history of US power markets, then please leave us

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.760
<v Speaker 3>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 3>if you're a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 3>of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 3>do is connect your Bloomberg account with Apple Podcasts. Thanks

0:43:45.440 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 3>for listening, Bead