Speaker 1: Newly released drone video shows Palestinian militants pretending to be
Speaker 1: workers from the world's Central Kitchen. They travel in two cars,
Speaker 1: one marked with the flag of the Humanitarian Organization before
Speaker 1: they're hit by IDF airstrikes.
Speaker 2: WCK in real time were able to verify that vehicle
Speaker 2: was not connected to the organization in any way, which
Speaker 2: means those tears were using that as a disguise for
Speaker 2: their terror activity inside Gaza.
Speaker 1: Israeli airstrikes targeted multiple areas of the enclave over the
Speaker 1: past twenty four hours, killing dozens of Palestinian civilians.
Speaker 3: Okay, so in spite of that, it's absolutely documented, undeniable
Speaker 3: that Hamas guys were masquerading as food relief guys. NBR
Speaker 3: considers it completely impossible that they would impersonate journalists, or
Speaker 3: at least that's what they're saying in this sence, and
Speaker 3: those views are supported practically to a person by the
Speaker 3: American left, a lot of the left in a lot
Speaker 3: of the Western world. What the hell is going on?
Speaker 3: To quote Eli Lake, who's a brilliant writer in the West,
Speaker 3: the politics of the Gaza War feature a strange marriage
Speaker 3: between political Islam and the twenty first century Western left,
Speaker 3: for instance, the Democratic Socialists of America. This is Mumdani's
Speaker 3: crew simultaneously support making New York a national hub for
Speaker 3: transgender medicine and want to globalize the Intifada.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that is a good point.
Speaker 3: It supp it supports the bleeding edge of social progressive
Speaker 3: values while throwing its full support behind the fanatic fascists
Speaker 3: who filmed their mass murder of Jews and probably posted
Speaker 3: the videos to Telegram and Lake. In an absolutely fabulous
Speaker 3: piece that will post I think you might get paywalled,
Speaker 3: but maybe not. Talks about how the what's called the
Speaker 3: red Green alliance among people who think about this sort
Speaker 3: of thing, how it came up, and it really came up,
Speaker 3: And yes.
Speaker 4: He was red in who's green here?
Speaker 3: Reds is and communists in green, the color of Hama
Speaker 3: and radical Islam and various thank you for asking for
Speaker 3: the clarification to hit for the room. Anyway, A lot
Speaker 3: of this arose during Iran's Islamic Revolution nineteen seventy eight
Speaker 3: and seventy nine. And he goes into and it's so
Speaker 3: interesting the details of how Ayatola Komaney, who is in
Speaker 3: exile in France, started giving all sorts of really carefully
Speaker 3: controlled interviews to American and European media outlets, and how
Speaker 3: they're on this pr campaign to convince the West that
Speaker 3: he's a reasonable fellow. In fact, he's really for democracy,
Speaker 3: and Lake is writing. Anybody who spent ten minutes looking
Speaker 3: into Komane knew that he was a hardcore is Lomist monster.
Speaker 3: You didn't even have to try to figure it out.
Speaker 3: But the left of American journalism, in Western journalism, and
Speaker 3: some folks like in the Carter administration became completely convinced
Speaker 3: and touted in the face of all of this that no,
Speaker 3: he was actually a really good guy. Richard Falk, a
Speaker 3: Princeton professor of international law who met with Comane during
Speaker 3: his exile outside of Paris. Andrew Young, Jimmy Carter's ambassador
Speaker 3: to the United Nations, told reporters that the Iotola will
Speaker 3: eventually be regarded as a saint like this fulk the
Speaker 3: Princeton professor, And because people were saying there were some
Speaker 3: on the right who said, look, this guy's a reactionary
Speaker 3: and a terrorist. And he said, to suppose that Iotola
Speaker 3: Comane is disassembling seems almost beyond belief. His political style
Speaker 3: is to express his real views defiantly and without apology,
Speaker 3: regardless of consequences. Blah blah blah. Thus the depiction of
Speaker 3: him as a fanatical reactionary and the bearer of crude
Speaker 3: prejudices seemed certainly and happily false. I know. Is also
Speaker 3: encouraging is that as entourage of close advisors is uniformly
Speaker 3: and composed of moderate progressive individuals.
Speaker 4: I know you and Eli Lake are about to explain
Speaker 4: to me why. But is it just as simple as
Speaker 4: the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and my
Speaker 4: enemy is me the United States. So somebody who doesn't
Speaker 4: like us is good to.
Speaker 3: I like, right there. There's more to it than that,
Speaker 3: but yeah, the very short version of it is essentially,
Speaker 3: wait a minute, you want to overthrow Western civilization. I
Speaker 3: want to overthrow Western civilization. You want to impose Islamism,
Speaker 3: but I want to impose Marxism. Well, I tell you what,
Speaker 3: how about we work together and then when the civilization's overthrown,
Speaker 3: will peacefully cooperate and divide the spoils. Then, of course,
Speaker 3: like in every revolution, they kill each other as fast
Speaker 3: as they can. But there's one more factor.
Speaker 4: You got jihad in my queer studies. You got queer
Speaker 4: studies in my jihad. Two great tastes. It tastes great together.
Speaker 3: Oh that's beautiful anyway. So this brings us to the
Speaker 3: connection between something I have been harping about for a
Speaker 3: very long time, as has James Lindsay and other folks.
Speaker 3: If there is one Western progressive who illuminates the emergence
Speaker 3: of the Red Green alliance, it is the French philosopher
Speaker 3: Michelle Foucaut. Well I've mentioned several times. In nineteen seventy eight,
Speaker 3: fouc was absolutely the peak of his influence. He was
Speaker 3: the postmodernist who is revolutionizing universities with his withering critique
Speaker 3: of the Western Enlightenment and values that underpin modern liberalism.
Speaker 3: Fucaut is literally anti Enlightenment, and he is the father
Speaker 3: of all critical theory. Okay, And I think people have
Speaker 3: a tendency to think, all right, Getty and Lindsay are
Speaker 3: paranoid or whatever, or their conspiracy theorist. I had a
Speaker 3: friend in high school who was Indian. His parents had
Speaker 3: emigrated from India and they were Hindus, and in visiting
Speaker 3: his house and hanging out with his family, so it
Speaker 3: became clear to me that there were figures in Hinduism
Speaker 3: that were known and revered to billions of people around
Speaker 3: the world who I'd never heard of. I would suggest
Speaker 3: to you my friends, and you are my friends. Fuko
Speaker 3: is that for the Neomarxists, for those who would overthrow
Speaker 3: Western civilization. He is a godhead to them. And you
Speaker 3: don't know his name, but trust me what I tell you.
Speaker 3: It's incredibly important that you understand. So, this guy was
Speaker 3: incredibly influential in the universities in the seventies, and in
Speaker 3: nineteen seventy eight he was commissioned by two Italian newspapers
Speaker 3: to report on the Iranian Revolution. And like one of
Speaker 3: those you know Left East you know Time magazine guys
Speaker 3: who were visiting the Soviet Union and one of their
Speaker 3: Potempkin villages back in the forties, say or fifties, he
Speaker 3: couldn't stop gut gushing about how great the Itola was,
Speaker 3: and he was going to get rid of the oppression
Speaker 3: of Western politics and Zabadabadu. So, and this gets a
Speaker 3: little complicated, but I'll get to the simple part. Fuco
Speaker 3: was a major intellectual influence on the late Columbia University
Speaker 3: of Professor Edward Sayd's Orientalism Now a postcolonial Ism study Bible,
Speaker 3: which critiqued how Western imperial writers made Arabs, Muslims and
Speaker 3: Easterners objects in their narratives and impose their own agenda
Speaker 3: on their histories. Here is the great postmodernist celebrating Ayatola
Speaker 3: Komany overthrowing the Western government, even though Komane would would
Speaker 3: execute Fuco and his company the first chance they got.
Speaker 3: But that was the birthplace of it. And until you
Speaker 3: understand that postmodernism thing, you don't get critical theory. You
Speaker 3: don't understand what DEI is and what it's trying to accomplish.
Speaker 3: You don't understand queer theory, radical gender theory, all the
Speaker 3: confused adolescent girls getting their healthy breasts removed because they're
Speaker 3: momentarily confused by you know, adolescents and puberty and the
Speaker 3: rest of it. This is all straight back to Fuco
Speaker 3: and critical theory.
Speaker 4: Clearly, this theory is true in that it is happening.
Speaker 4: I still don't get how you're not argued out of
Speaker 4: that position very quickly. If somebody says to you, you
Speaker 4: realize if you're in Iran, they would they would murder
Speaker 4: you immediately. Well, yeah, so I guess I'd better pick
Speaker 4: a different group to work with.
Speaker 3: I mean, right, a different philosophy. Here's the thing, and
Speaker 3: these people are smart. I mean they're insane, but they're smart.
Speaker 3: They convince you completely of their premise that Western society
Speaker 3: what was that phrase, uh, have made all other people
Speaker 3: objects in their narratives and impose their own agenda on
Speaker 3: their histories. The key philosophy of critical theory is that
Speaker 3: there is no objective truth there.
Speaker 4: Don't even seek it, it doesn't exist.
Speaker 3: All there is is narratives, and narratives come from your culture,
Speaker 3: and since Western culture is dominant, it has created a
Speaker 3: narrative that says the Iyatola Komene is a monster, but
Speaker 3: that's just because they're threatened by him, so they're racists,
Speaker 3: they're othering him. And once you have that down to
Speaker 3: your bones, then you can't be argued off of it
Speaker 3: on the basis of me saying they torture and then
Speaker 3: kill anybody who's gay or transgender because I'm a Westerner
Speaker 3: trying to lie to them using my narrative.
Speaker 4: So they don't believe that jihadis would murder gay people,
Speaker 4: or they think jihadis only murdered gay people because of
Speaker 4: the position we've put them in.
Speaker 3: Uh yeah, indirectly, Yeah, the first part, one hundred percent.
Speaker 3: And or we have so dominated them and crushed their
Speaker 3: spirits and oppressed them that they're acting out in ways
Speaker 3: that they won't anymore when the enlightenment comes, when the
Speaker 3: Marxist revolution comes. I mean, like excusing the crimes of
Speaker 3: October seventh. You saw that directly. Look, they're under oppression.
Speaker 3: What do you expect them to do?
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I don't.
Speaker 3: Believe they raped and killed babies. No, they just fought
Speaker 3: back against the oppressor self solution.
Speaker 4: That's a scary thing to be up against. There's way
Speaker 4: too many people to believe it.
Speaker 3: Oh, and they're in our schools, folks, our elementary schools,
Speaker 3: our high schools, and our colleges and our grad schools.
Speaker 3: That is one of the dominant philosophies, if not the
Speaker 3: dominant philosophy in our educational complex. Which is why I'm
Speaker 3: always saying it's the most important problem that faces America.
Speaker 3: In China, it's the center street jihadism than man well,
Speaker 3: post Marxism, but cultural Marxism, postmodernism, neo Marxism, whatever you
Speaker 3: want to call it.
Speaker 4: It's interesting because back then, when Mitt Romney is running
Speaker 4: for president and after nine to eleven, jihadism did seem
Speaker 4: like the biggest problem in the world. And it's a problem,
Speaker 4: no doubt. But I'm more worried about Neo Marxism in
Speaker 4: the foothold it's got in the United States and Western
Speaker 4: culture than I am about ji Hotism.
Speaker 3: By a lot, right, right, Yeah, my final word, and folks,
Speaker 3: I apologize in advance. I'm gonna use a bad letter
Speaker 3: here if you think I don't know that seems kind
Speaker 3: of paranoid. These efing people wrote efing books, Their efing
Speaker 3: names are on the efing spines, and they fing describe
Speaker 3: precisely what they're efing going to do, and they're doing
Speaker 3: it precisely as they effing do described. End of screen.
Speaker 3: Troubling societies are brought down by their own decadence.
Speaker 4: If you're interested in this stuff, man, go to YouTube
Speaker 4: and just type in James Lindsay. He's got some unbelievable
Speaker 4: YouTube videos about this that are so damn interesting, And
Speaker 4: a great
Speaker 3: Place to start is for the one hundredth time, his
Speaker 3: book with Helen Pluckrose Cynical Theories it's great,