1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:32,920 Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. China 7 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 1: and the US have been engaged in a trade skirmish 8 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:38,479 Speaker 1: for quite a while now, although there is a sign 9 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:41,879 Speaker 1: that perhaps these tensions are easing. Joining us now as 10 00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:44,720 Speaker 1: Bill Rhodes, President and chief executive officer of William R. 11 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:47,920 Speaker 1: Rhodes Global Advisors, author of Banker to the World, Leadership 12 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 1: Lessons from the front Lines of Global Finance, helped broker 13 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 1: some of the biggest deals both at a sovereign and 14 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:58,480 Speaker 1: corporate level, over the past decades in which he's been active. 15 00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 1: He's shoining us here in our interactive Broker Studios. So, Bill, 16 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,160 Speaker 1: you just got back from China. Do you get the 17 00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:08,479 Speaker 1: feeling that there is a thawing in the tensions between 18 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:11,240 Speaker 1: the US and China from the Chinese perspective? Well, first 19 00:01:11,240 --> 00:01:13,360 Speaker 1: of all, at least I want to thank you and 20 00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 1: Tim for inviting me. Is my favorite program, So anyway, 21 00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:23,119 Speaker 1: it was. It was a very interesting week I spent there, 22 00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:26,560 Speaker 1: and particularly with the trade tensions. UH. There's no doubt 23 00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 1: that China wants to come to an agreement because the 24 00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:32,520 Speaker 1: Chinese economy is slowing down. They have this mountain of 25 00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:37,199 Speaker 1: debt of over three percent of gross of GDP gross 26 00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:40,840 Speaker 1: national product, and they have a lot of stresses there 27 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:45,840 Speaker 1: on manufacturing is down and sold. No matter what they 28 00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: say in the sense of tough talk, they want to 29 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:50,720 Speaker 1: do a deal. It's not going to be in ninety days. 30 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:52,800 Speaker 1: But I think we'll see some progress. We already saw 31 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 1: the oobile tariffs UH, and I think we're going to 32 00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:58,600 Speaker 1: see other things going forward. But it's not gonna be 33 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:02,240 Speaker 1: solved overnight. The basic problem between the United States and 34 00:02:02,320 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 1: China will not be trade going forward, because I think 35 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:08,000 Speaker 1: something can be worked out. I think it's going to 36 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:10,359 Speaker 1: be intellectual property. That's going to be a tough one. 37 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:14,000 Speaker 1: And I've said this on on your program before. As 38 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:17,320 Speaker 1: far as the Chinese economy is going itself, they'll make 39 00:02:17,360 --> 00:02:20,040 Speaker 1: their six and a half projection for this year, but 40 00:02:20,160 --> 00:02:21,760 Speaker 1: next year is going to be a tough year. For 41 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:25,400 Speaker 1: them because they need to continue financial reform, which means 42 00:02:25,919 --> 00:02:29,400 Speaker 1: reigning in the bank's bad loans. Uh. You know, the 43 00:02:29,480 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 1: municipality bad loans and the provinces bad loans, and they 44 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:36,160 Speaker 1: have to shut down some of these small regional banks 45 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:40,000 Speaker 1: in northeast China, which basically a zombie institution. So there's 46 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:42,079 Speaker 1: gonna be a lot of pressure on the Chinese economy 47 00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:45,360 Speaker 1: next year. Uh. They hope they can get six percent, 48 00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:48,359 Speaker 1: but it could fall below six for the first time ever. 49 00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:54,840 Speaker 1: Bill Rhodes, you have negotiated during your career with dictators 50 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:59,720 Speaker 1: strong men, as well as corporate executives and government officials 51 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:04,240 Speaker 1: and central bank regulators. Who are the key people in 52 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 1: China right now? Well, obviously, uh, you start off with 53 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:13,919 Speaker 1: the president and leader uh Shi Jinping. His vice president 54 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:18,079 Speaker 1: is very strong because he is an expert on economics 55 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 1: one Shi Shan. He's also was a trouble shooter for 56 00:03:22,840 --> 00:03:25,679 Speaker 1: previous governments. He's the one who cleaned up stars in Beijing. 57 00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 1: He's the one who cleaned up the problems in Guangdong Province. 58 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:34,640 Speaker 1: He's a disciple mentory of of Joranji, the great Premier 59 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 1: of China, who cleaned up their Economy and got him 60 00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 1: into the w t OH. But also the head of 61 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 1: the People's Bank of China is very important. We have 62 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 1: a technician in there, and I was privileged enough to 63 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:47,800 Speaker 1: to spend an hour and a half alone with him 64 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 1: at lunch. Ye Gang his name is. He actually taught 65 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:55,520 Speaker 1: at the University Indiana for uh eight years, so his 66 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:59,120 Speaker 1: English is as good as ours. And the previous Governor 67 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:01,680 Speaker 1: of the People's Bank of China, Joshiah Schwan, who's a 68 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:05,160 Speaker 1: leading reformer who's still although he does not have the 69 00:04:05,200 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 1: official position in the People's Bank of China, he has 70 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:11,080 Speaker 1: the title uh, you know, President emeritus there and he's 71 00:04:11,080 --> 00:04:15,600 Speaker 1: advising UH both the President Si Jinping and uh Want 72 00:04:15,640 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 1: Hi Sean. And then there's one other person who has 73 00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:23,760 Speaker 1: the title Vice Premier of the Economy, and that's uh 74 00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:27,599 Speaker 1: someone named who's new that in the sense that we 75 00:04:27,640 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: didn't see him before, and that's his name is Lee Who, 76 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:34,840 Speaker 1: And he's the one who's talking with Manuchin on the telephone. 77 00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:38,360 Speaker 1: The big problem among others that the Chinese have with us, 78 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:41,680 Speaker 1: they don't know who's on first, second, and third in negotiation. 79 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:43,960 Speaker 1: It's like tinkers to have is a chance one in 80 00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:48,599 Speaker 1: his lightheiser the next minutes in Manuchin. Uh, they're confused, well, 81 00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 1: they're they're confused about who's on first. But also, you know, 82 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,919 Speaker 1: sort of the distinction between the trade tensions and intellectual 83 00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:58,960 Speaker 1: property is confusing to me because I don't totally understand 84 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: how intertwined those are. Well, I think for the United 85 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:05,000 Speaker 1: States is very important because the Chinese announced their program 86 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:08,800 Speaker 1: of two thousand twenty five, which was their goal to 87 00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 1: be the leading UH innovators in technology in the world, 88 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:16,680 Speaker 1: and of course that gets into five G and all 89 00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:20,560 Speaker 1: of these things, and the United States Silicon Valley forever, 90 00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:25,120 Speaker 1: we've been the leaders in technology, and so the feeling 91 00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:29,520 Speaker 1: is that there's a real challenge to us. Also, UH, 92 00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:31,560 Speaker 1: there's also a feeling here in the United States and 93 00:05:31,600 --> 00:05:34,280 Speaker 1: in Europe that the Chinese have gone out of their 94 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:39,040 Speaker 1: way to gain technology through several different ways. One when 95 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:43,240 Speaker 1: in American the European company wants to operates up in 96 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 1: China on a joint venture, they make them turn over 97 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 1: their intellectual property. The other thing is many people in 98 00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:51,960 Speaker 1: the US and Europe feel the Chinese have been stealing 99 00:05:52,040 --> 00:05:56,520 Speaker 1: technology from us. So this question of intellectual property is 100 00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:58,880 Speaker 1: going to be tougher to solve than the trade issue, 101 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,760 Speaker 1: because let's say the economy slowing down in China, the 102 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:05,480 Speaker 1: economy is slowing down here, and so I think it's 103 00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:09,159 Speaker 1: on both, you know, both governments. I think want to 104 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:11,160 Speaker 1: come to a deal, all right, Bill Rhodes. He is 105 00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:14,440 Speaker 1: the author of Banker to the World Leadership Lessons from 106 00:06:14,480 --> 00:06:34,560 Speaker 1: the front Lines of Global Finance. Oil definitely having a 107 00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:37,920 Speaker 1: trickle down effect on broader markets over the past week 108 00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:41,440 Speaker 1: or so. Uh, the three days ended yesterday, it comprised 109 00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:45,920 Speaker 1: comprised the biggest drop in the in the oil index, 110 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:49,240 Speaker 1: in the oil prices. Joining us now to understand what's 111 00:06:49,240 --> 00:06:51,640 Speaker 1: been driving the big moves we've been seeing there, John Kilduff, 112 00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:55,720 Speaker 1: founding partner of Again Capital. So John, let's just start there. 113 00:06:55,720 --> 00:06:58,640 Speaker 1: What is the main driver behind the declines that we've 114 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:02,599 Speaker 1: seen in the price of crude? Well, a relative over 115 00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:06,800 Speaker 1: supply to the market, partly because sanctions that we're supposed 116 00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:09,680 Speaker 1: to go on Iran didn't really come to pass, and 117 00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:13,520 Speaker 1: so they're still producing, and Saudias and Russians rushed production 118 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 1: onto the market to make up for what was supposed 119 00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:19,640 Speaker 1: to be lost barrels. And then now the economic slowing 120 00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: that we're seeing, particularly in China in Asia has weakened 121 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:26,720 Speaker 1: the demand side of the equation. So it's sort of 122 00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 1: been a one to punch here. Uh for the oil 123 00:07:29,680 --> 00:07:36,600 Speaker 1: commodity John, who are the sellers and are they forced sellers? Well, 124 00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:39,720 Speaker 1: I'll tell you him. A big speculative long position did 125 00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:42,560 Speaker 1: get built up into this market, um, right around the 126 00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:44,960 Speaker 1: highs in October there when we were up around over 127 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:47,720 Speaker 1: seventy dollars a barrel for w t I based upon 128 00:07:47,760 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 1: the CFTC data that we get to see every Friday. Uh, 129 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:54,840 Speaker 1: they've been washed out. And yes, there's been rumors of 130 00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 1: forced hedge fund liquidation UM and and a growing a 131 00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:02,520 Speaker 1: barrish fishooning in this market, and that there's a net 132 00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:06,520 Speaker 1: short sellers in here now too. So sentiment has really 133 00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:10,080 Speaker 1: turned quite negative at this point, UM, and it remains so. 134 00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 1: One thing that I'm struggling with is Saudi Arabia just 135 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:17,520 Speaker 1: came out with their budget for next year, and I'm 136 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:21,040 Speaker 1: struggling with the idea that they are assuming eighty dollars 137 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:25,280 Speaker 1: a barrel for the price of crew next year in 138 00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 1: order to make their budget work, and they would need 139 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 1: a price upwards of ninety dollars a barrel in order 140 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:37,920 Speaker 1: to balance their budget. Does that concern you, um? If anything, 141 00:08:37,960 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 1: it's um. You know. It shows me that they have 142 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:43,800 Speaker 1: a real incentive to follow through on the the old 143 00:08:43,800 --> 00:08:45,840 Speaker 1: peck Russia, a chord that was struck a couple of 144 00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:48,640 Speaker 1: weeks ago. I think they're feeling a little flushed with 145 00:08:48,679 --> 00:08:51,240 Speaker 1: success because of what they they were able to achieve 146 00:08:51,280 --> 00:08:54,559 Speaker 1: in the aftermath of the November deal. This whole thing 147 00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:57,760 Speaker 1: just fell apart over the summer again because of the 148 00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:00,440 Speaker 1: real almost trick that was put on the market with 149 00:09:00,480 --> 00:09:02,840 Speaker 1: the Iran sanctions. So I guess they believe they can 150 00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:05,719 Speaker 1: do it again. I also think they have barring capacity, 151 00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 1: so they're not going to worry about it. But they 152 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 1: also have home fires to tamp down. Here is there's 153 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 1: some unrest in the kingdom. No better way to play 154 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:16,400 Speaker 1: kate that than to uh, you know, give away some money, 155 00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 1: which is which is what this budget does in a big, 156 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 1: big way, lots of extra money to government workers and 157 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 1: others that should help keep the you know, waters calm 158 00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:29,319 Speaker 1: or calm there as as we move forward here almost 159 00:09:29,400 --> 00:09:32,640 Speaker 1: on que by the way, the facility. The Saudi Oil 160 00:09:32,679 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 1: Minister this morning was all over the wires trying to 161 00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 1: talk up the price, committing to a big cutback and 162 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:43,079 Speaker 1: extending this deal next April when they all meet again. So, Um, 163 00:09:43,120 --> 00:09:46,080 Speaker 1: they're trying to do everything they can to support this price, 164 00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:50,080 Speaker 1: for sure, John speak if you can about us shail producers, 165 00:09:50,160 --> 00:09:56,559 Speaker 1: At what price do share producers stop making money? You're 166 00:09:56,559 --> 00:09:59,040 Speaker 1: getting into that zone now, Pam. You know, particularly when 167 00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:00,920 Speaker 1: you've sort of had an all the cost not just 168 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:05,560 Speaker 1: the pure stage drilling and extraction methodologies. It's gonna start 169 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 1: to get tough for them right now. But they have 170 00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:11,240 Speaker 1: been successful, many of them, particularly in the in the 171 00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:14,400 Speaker 1: Permian basin, where they've driven break even course down two 172 00:10:14,520 --> 00:10:16,800 Speaker 1: round thirty five to forty dollars a barrel. Now, some 173 00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:18,439 Speaker 1: of those numbers are all over the place, so they're 174 00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 1: gonna try to hang in there. Um. And I know 175 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:23,560 Speaker 1: there's a lot of concern too about the indebtedness of 176 00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:26,360 Speaker 1: the group. I'll tell you when the last generation of 177 00:10:26,400 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: this price is crashing back in two era. Um, what 178 00:10:30,280 --> 00:10:34,440 Speaker 1: the banks basically did was extend the loans, recapitalized the loans, 179 00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 1: and repackaged a loans. So I'm not as worried about 180 00:10:37,480 --> 00:10:39,560 Speaker 1: the group falling apart this time, unless we were to 181 00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:42,960 Speaker 1: get another sort of extended sell off down into the 182 00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:45,480 Speaker 1: same mid to low thirties. But it's hard to see 183 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:48,319 Speaker 1: that happening. John. Every time you've been on, you've been 184 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:52,320 Speaker 1: incredibly accurate, and I've been impressed by some of your forecasts. 185 00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:56,200 Speaker 1: So what's your sense of where oil heads. I don't 186 00:10:56,200 --> 00:11:00,559 Speaker 1: know throughout next year, it's at the say it's it's 187 00:11:00,559 --> 00:11:03,120 Speaker 1: a tough call right now. I've been trying to shake 188 00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: up the magic eight ball vigorously um these days. But 189 00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 1: uh my, my inclination is too as the guys in 190 00:11:11,559 --> 00:11:13,440 Speaker 1: the bun or guys and gals in the bond markets say, 191 00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:16,560 Speaker 1: don't fight the Fed, I'm inclined not to bite Saudi Arabia. 192 00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:19,800 Speaker 1: So if they do come through with the extensive cuts 193 00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:23,600 Speaker 1: that they're talking about, prices should head back higher. And 194 00:11:23,679 --> 00:11:26,800 Speaker 1: because also because sentiment has just gotten so negative in 195 00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:29,480 Speaker 1: this market that there's a tendency to overshoot here in 196 00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:32,480 Speaker 1: commodities especially, and we should swing back. So I would 197 00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 1: expect this to be back into the you know, at 198 00:11:36,120 --> 00:11:40,360 Speaker 1: least low sixties, say by by midyear next year. All right, 199 00:11:40,400 --> 00:11:44,640 Speaker 1: Thanks very much, John Kilduff, founding partner again Capital speaking 200 00:11:44,640 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 1: about the world of oil. The topic now is the 201 00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:09,160 Speaker 1: housing market. Sales are previously owned US homes rose for 202 00:12:09,200 --> 00:12:13,400 Speaker 1: a second consecutive month and exceeded forecasts in November. It 203 00:12:13,520 --> 00:12:18,600 Speaker 1: suggests that consumer demand is picking up as price gains moderate. 204 00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:22,760 Speaker 1: Here to tell us more, Darryl Fairweather, chief economist for 205 00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:26,560 Speaker 1: Redfinn Corp. Joining us from Seattle. Darryl, thank you very 206 00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 1: much for being with us. Do you believe that the 207 00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:34,120 Speaker 1: sales of previously owned US homes that this rise will continue? 208 00:12:35,440 --> 00:12:37,720 Speaker 1: The market right now is much different than it was 209 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 1: earlier this year. Earlier this year we had really fast 210 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:45,600 Speaker 1: price growth, especially in coastal markets like San Francisco and Seattle. 211 00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:48,679 Speaker 1: Prices were growing in the double digits every year, and 212 00:12:48,720 --> 00:12:51,840 Speaker 1: that has moderated since earlier this year. Now price growth 213 00:12:52,120 --> 00:12:55,280 Speaker 1: is more around four percent. And it's actually taken a 214 00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:58,320 Speaker 1: while for sellers to get the news that buyer demand 215 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:00,920 Speaker 1: isn't what it used to be, so we've seen fewer 216 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:04,600 Speaker 1: bidding wars, more price drops. But I think finally sellers 217 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:06,800 Speaker 1: are starting to get the message are dropping their prices 218 00:13:06,880 --> 00:13:09,280 Speaker 1: and that's why we've seen sales pick up this month. 219 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:11,440 Speaker 1: So Daryl, do you can you just give us a 220 00:13:11,480 --> 00:13:14,320 Speaker 1: sense of why there has been a slowdown in the 221 00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:17,360 Speaker 1: US housing market. Is it an interest rate story, is 222 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:20,520 Speaker 1: it just a demand story, or is it a supply story. 223 00:13:21,080 --> 00:13:24,680 Speaker 1: I think the story here is affordability. So prices were growing, 224 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:28,040 Speaker 1: and they were growing very quickly, and recently interest rates 225 00:13:28,040 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 1: one up at the same time, and buyers has finally 226 00:13:30,640 --> 00:13:34,079 Speaker 1: had enough. They couldn't keep raising their prices and keep 227 00:13:34,120 --> 00:13:37,559 Speaker 1: paying these high prices getting the same homes. So we've 228 00:13:37,559 --> 00:13:40,760 Speaker 1: seen buyers back off, and as a result, sellers are 229 00:13:40,760 --> 00:13:43,360 Speaker 1: starting to drop their prices and meet buyers at their 230 00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:47,720 Speaker 1: at their price reservation. Do you expect mortgage rates to 231 00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 1: continue to decline? It's interesting. So mortgage rates follow both 232 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:56,120 Speaker 1: supply and demands. So on the supply side, the cost 233 00:13:56,200 --> 00:13:59,080 Speaker 1: of borrowing is higher, and if the FED rates interest 234 00:13:59,160 --> 00:14:02,040 Speaker 1: rate rates today, the cost of borrowing will continue to 235 00:14:02,160 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 1: rise for the people who are supplying these mortgages. But 236 00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:08,600 Speaker 1: at the same time, we've seen mortgage rate demand fall 237 00:14:08,800 --> 00:14:10,839 Speaker 1: because people are buying fewer homes now than they were 238 00:14:10,920 --> 00:14:13,480 Speaker 1: last year. It'll be interesting to see which of these 239 00:14:13,760 --> 00:14:18,920 Speaker 1: forces uh end up dominating. So we could see and 240 00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:22,600 Speaker 1: a rise in interest rates and on mortgage interest rates. 241 00:14:22,640 --> 00:14:25,240 Speaker 1: But it buyers back off, then maybe that will be mitigated. 242 00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:27,720 Speaker 1: So which areas of the market do you think are 243 00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:31,320 Speaker 1: still poised for significant price increases? I mean are their 244 00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:34,040 Speaker 1: regions or their sectors of the housing market that still 245 00:14:34,080 --> 00:14:41,960 Speaker 1: have upside that are significant. Yeah, so places like Nashville, UM, Atlanta, Austin, 246 00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:45,360 Speaker 1: some of these inland markets. That's where we'll see more 247 00:14:45,360 --> 00:14:48,440 Speaker 1: buyer demand grow. And that's because people are moving towards 248 00:14:48,520 --> 00:14:52,160 Speaker 1: more affordable places. We have this migration data redfin where 249 00:14:52,160 --> 00:14:54,760 Speaker 1: we can see where people are searching for homes based 250 00:14:54,800 --> 00:14:58,400 Speaker 1: on their IP address, and we see increasing number of 251 00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:01,840 Speaker 1: people searching for homes and are affordable places, especially in 252 00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:05,280 Speaker 1: really expensive places like San Francisco or Seattle or Washington, 253 00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:08,240 Speaker 1: d C. They're looking to move inland. What do you 254 00:15:08,280 --> 00:15:14,640 Speaker 1: believe institutional owners of real estate will face in I 255 00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:17,960 Speaker 1: think that so there do you mean by institutional owners 256 00:15:18,040 --> 00:15:20,360 Speaker 1: companies or do you mean like a typical investor? No, no, 257 00:15:20,520 --> 00:15:25,880 Speaker 1: A companies. You know the institutional part of the market, right, right, 258 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:28,920 Speaker 1: So we have redfind now and there are other institutional 259 00:15:28,960 --> 00:15:31,880 Speaker 1: owners um like open door and Delo has their own 260 00:15:31,880 --> 00:15:35,360 Speaker 1: institutional owners UM, they are going to have to change 261 00:15:35,400 --> 00:15:39,320 Speaker 1: their strategy. Buyers. Previously, they may have seen an offer 262 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:41,320 Speaker 1: from an institutional owner and thought this was a really 263 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:44,960 Speaker 1: good price. But institutional owners may have to lower their price, 264 00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:49,200 Speaker 1: and sellers may not want to accept those prices, thinking 265 00:15:49,240 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 1: that the market hasn't changed as much as these institutional 266 00:15:51,640 --> 00:15:54,000 Speaker 1: owners think the market has changed. So, Daryl, where do 267 00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:58,280 Speaker 1: you see prices declining the most regionally or in a 268 00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:03,040 Speaker 1: specific sector? So the places that really saw the most 269 00:16:03,160 --> 00:16:06,000 Speaker 1: price growth, we're going to see that price growth slow. 270 00:16:06,040 --> 00:16:09,840 Speaker 1: I don't think that price growth will necessarily go negative. UM, 271 00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:12,640 Speaker 1: but in places like Seattle and San Francisco, that price 272 00:16:12,720 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 1: growth is not going to be what it was earlier 273 00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:18,400 Speaker 1: this year or in We're going to see price growth slow. 274 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:20,880 Speaker 1: But that's interesting to me. You don't see it actually 275 00:16:20,880 --> 00:16:23,560 Speaker 1: going negative. Well, So with that, a lot of people 276 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:28,320 Speaker 1: actually UM prices have fallen from earlier this year. Some 277 00:16:28,400 --> 00:16:31,680 Speaker 1: of that is seasonality. The prices have dropped more than 278 00:16:31,720 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 1: just a seasonal effect in places like Seattle in San Francisco. 279 00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:39,360 Speaker 1: But come spring, prices maybe exactly where they were last spring, 280 00:16:39,440 --> 00:16:42,440 Speaker 1: maybe a little bit higher. Uh, there's a possibility that 281 00:16:42,440 --> 00:16:44,080 Speaker 1: may be lower than they were last spring. But I 282 00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:48,040 Speaker 1: think that's a small a small possibility. Since you're coming 283 00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:51,360 Speaker 1: to us from Seattle, can't avoid asking the question having 284 00:16:51,400 --> 00:16:55,200 Speaker 1: to do with Amazon dot Com and new headquarters. What 285 00:16:55,360 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 1: does this mean for those areas? We think prices might 286 00:16:57,960 --> 00:17:00,960 Speaker 1: go up, but what does it also mean for housing 287 00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:04,480 Speaker 1: prices in Seattle? Yes, so I actually used to work 288 00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:06,640 Speaker 1: for Amazon before I came to Redfin, and I had 289 00:17:06,680 --> 00:17:10,440 Speaker 1: co workers who were tracking where the h Q two 290 00:17:10,480 --> 00:17:12,080 Speaker 1: is going to go and thinking that they were going 291 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:14,200 Speaker 1: to move back home. We're to be close to family 292 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:16,840 Speaker 1: depending on where it went. I actually have one friend 293 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:19,520 Speaker 1: who whose mom was calling her the day that they 294 00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:21,920 Speaker 1: announced in Washington, d C. Asking her if she was 295 00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:24,560 Speaker 1: going to move back home. So I think we'll see, um, 296 00:17:24,600 --> 00:17:27,359 Speaker 1: some Amazon workers in Seattle put their homes up for 297 00:17:27,400 --> 00:17:29,959 Speaker 1: sale to move to these new locations because there are 298 00:17:29,960 --> 00:17:32,480 Speaker 1: all these new jobs and the transfer is pretty easy. 299 00:17:32,960 --> 00:17:35,880 Speaker 1: In the actual places where the head cars are going home, 300 00:17:35,920 --> 00:17:38,520 Speaker 1: prices will be affected. Um. It will kind of depend 301 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 1: on the transportation that is around those areas. So in 302 00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:45,800 Speaker 1: a place like Crystal City that's slightly outside the study center, 303 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:49,639 Speaker 1: we will probably see housing demand grow the most in 304 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:52,639 Speaker 1: the suburbs that are far away from d C but 305 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:55,280 Speaker 1: relatively close to Crystal City. So if your commute is 306 00:17:55,320 --> 00:17:57,800 Speaker 1: going from an hour commute to a half hour commute, 307 00:17:58,040 --> 00:18:01,680 Speaker 1: that's where we'll see demand go up. Darryl Fairweather, thank 308 00:18:01,720 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: you so much for being with us. Daryl Fairweather is 309 00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:08,880 Speaker 1: chief economist for Redfinn. Interesting to be getting more signs 310 00:18:08,920 --> 00:18:11,360 Speaker 1: of stability in the US housing market and a more 311 00:18:11,440 --> 00:18:29,000 Speaker 1: sanguine view of what's to come in the meantime. I 312 00:18:29,040 --> 00:18:33,200 Speaker 1: want to turn our attention to the information that big 313 00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:38,240 Speaker 1: tech reveals about its users to uh other companies and 314 00:18:38,480 --> 00:18:40,480 Speaker 1: profit from it. And joining us now is Mark Douglas, 315 00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:44,159 Speaker 1: chief executive of Steelhouse. Mark, thank you so much for 316 00:18:44,200 --> 00:18:45,879 Speaker 1: being with us. The New York Times put out a 317 00:18:45,920 --> 00:18:49,400 Speaker 1: story that was really eye opening of how Facebook collected 318 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:52,280 Speaker 1: data from its users and shared them with other big 319 00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:57,000 Speaker 1: companies such as Amazon, profiting from it without necessarily disclosing this. 320 00:18:57,040 --> 00:19:00,119 Speaker 1: So what did you make of that article? Um, well, 321 00:19:00,160 --> 00:19:04,080 Speaker 1: it's not good, that's that's for sure. I think it's 322 00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:08,439 Speaker 1: clearly part of a pattern that Facebook's definition of personal 323 00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 1: information and the common consumer, and certainly government, you know, 324 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:16,880 Speaker 1: kind of your euro government, and now US government definition 325 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:22,159 Speaker 1: of personal information are very different. And Facebook view that information, 326 00:19:22,359 --> 00:19:25,240 Speaker 1: like you just said, is something that could they could 327 00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:27,640 Speaker 1: sell and they could profit ford and they can provide 328 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:32,320 Speaker 1: the partners, and you know, it's it's just not a 329 00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:35,640 Speaker 1: great pattern that they've established. And now is even more 330 00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:39,000 Speaker 1: is coming light with the story Mark Douglas, do you 331 00:19:39,040 --> 00:19:42,399 Speaker 1: believe this to be an intentional effort on the part 332 00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:47,520 Speaker 1: of Facebook to obscure what actually happened? Or is this 333 00:19:47,680 --> 00:19:52,600 Speaker 1: something that, as they describe many times, the technological wherewithal 334 00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:57,680 Speaker 1: in order to follow all this may not be available. Well, 335 00:19:57,720 --> 00:20:03,159 Speaker 1: I think essentially the this is based on the reporting 336 00:20:03,240 --> 00:20:06,720 Speaker 1: from the New York Times, this was intentional. This wasn't 337 00:20:07,080 --> 00:20:11,760 Speaker 1: a data breach, This was an accidental. Facebook provided information 338 00:20:11,840 --> 00:20:15,840 Speaker 1: to partners in order to benefit those partners businesses and 339 00:20:15,960 --> 00:20:19,560 Speaker 1: for Facebook to benefit ultimately. The reason they're doing it 340 00:20:19,640 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 1: is because they don't think there would be a backlash 341 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:24,600 Speaker 1: from the users, and quite frankly, there hasn't been much 342 00:20:24,600 --> 00:20:27,720 Speaker 1: of a backlash from the users. Although Facebook usages down, 343 00:20:28,119 --> 00:20:32,760 Speaker 1: Instagram usages is continuing to expand rapidly, and at the 344 00:20:32,880 --> 00:20:34,880 Speaker 1: end of the day, you know, these stories come out 345 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:37,879 Speaker 1: and people just keep using these platforms and and somewhat 346 00:20:37,960 --> 00:20:40,440 Speaker 1: yawned about them. And so as long as that's the 347 00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:43,159 Speaker 1: case Facebook, I think now it's such a spotlight on 348 00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:46,120 Speaker 1: them that they have to restrict those actions. But they 349 00:20:46,119 --> 00:20:49,280 Speaker 1: didn't have that spotlight when this was occurring, and so 350 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 1: so they had no incentive not to do it. You know. 351 00:20:52,440 --> 00:20:54,320 Speaker 1: But Mark, I mean to push back a little bit 352 00:20:54,480 --> 00:20:57,640 Speaker 1: exactly the point that you're making that users don't care. 353 00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:00,679 Speaker 1: That they're willing to go along with this contract of 354 00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:03,240 Speaker 1: getting free access to platforms that connect them with their 355 00:21:03,280 --> 00:21:06,520 Speaker 1: friends and give them access to news or in return 356 00:21:06,640 --> 00:21:09,240 Speaker 1: for giving up some of their privacy. So where does 357 00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:13,919 Speaker 1: the problem come in, Well, the problem comes in in 358 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:19,359 Speaker 1: that the governments are not agreeing with the consumers using 359 00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:24,439 Speaker 1: the platforms, you know, the the EU, the European Union 360 00:21:24,560 --> 00:21:28,280 Speaker 1: clearly doesn't agree with all the laws they've been passing, 361 00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:31,080 Speaker 1: and the U s Government seems to be somewhere in 362 00:21:31,119 --> 00:21:34,360 Speaker 1: the middle. We have hearings, but then there's no legislation, 363 00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:38,639 Speaker 1: and so the and and again the reason that's probably 364 00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:43,159 Speaker 1: occurring is because the senators and congressmen are not are 365 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:46,760 Speaker 1: not getting you know, kind of a huge consumer backlash 366 00:21:46,880 --> 00:21:49,800 Speaker 1: on this. And I think consumers. You know, they think 367 00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:52,320 Speaker 1: of this like, Okay, so my friend list was shared 368 00:21:52,320 --> 00:21:55,800 Speaker 1: with Spotify and I got better music Again what you 369 00:21:55,880 --> 00:21:59,199 Speaker 1: just said. They think it's a quid pro quo and um, 370 00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:02,600 Speaker 1: but think ultimately this church Facebook. I think the big, 371 00:22:02,640 --> 00:22:05,200 Speaker 1: big problem Facebook is going to have, it's going to 372 00:22:05,280 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 1: be I think it's going to be very hard for 373 00:22:07,080 --> 00:22:10,719 Speaker 1: them to make acquisitions. Um. Everything they do is going 374 00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:13,199 Speaker 1: to be scrutinized going forward. And I think this is 375 00:22:13,200 --> 00:22:15,280 Speaker 1: starting to put it over the top. This is a 376 00:22:15,440 --> 00:22:19,359 Speaker 1: just clear disclosure of information without the slosing it to 377 00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:23,800 Speaker 1: the consumers that that provided the information. Mark Douglas. This 378 00:22:23,960 --> 00:22:29,280 Speaker 1: comes at a time when the government has received investigations 379 00:22:29,359 --> 00:22:34,000 Speaker 1: and reports about the use of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, 380 00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:38,879 Speaker 1: and Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, as part of 381 00:22:38,920 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 1: an effort on the part of the Russian Internet Research 382 00:22:44,119 --> 00:22:51,719 Speaker 1: Agency to manipulate what people see an access online. Is 383 00:22:51,760 --> 00:22:55,199 Speaker 1: that in any way connected based on the culture that 384 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:58,879 Speaker 1: you know about Facebook, No, I don't think that's in 385 00:22:58,920 --> 00:23:01,919 Speaker 1: any way connected. At think that what that proves is 386 00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:06,000 Speaker 1: that Facebook's ultimate business as they are an advertising platform 387 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:08,560 Speaker 1: to reach the consume. The two point two billion users 388 00:23:08,600 --> 00:23:12,800 Speaker 1: reaching Facebook, the over billion users using Instagram, over billion 389 00:23:12,880 --> 00:23:17,560 Speaker 1: users using What'sapp, and it's a very effective advertising platform. 390 00:23:17,600 --> 00:23:21,639 Speaker 1: And essentially the Russian government figured out that they could 391 00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:24,359 Speaker 1: you can sway elections. You can you cannot only use 392 00:23:24,440 --> 00:23:26,720 Speaker 1: it to sell clothes, you could use it to sell 393 00:23:26,840 --> 00:23:31,480 Speaker 1: presidents and they and they did that. I can't say 394 00:23:31,520 --> 00:23:35,840 Speaker 1: that the Russian government led to the current president's elections, 395 00:23:36,359 --> 00:23:39,120 Speaker 1: but clearly there was a lot of that spending going 396 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:42,040 Speaker 1: on to to try and influence it. And so this 397 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:45,359 Speaker 1: is the quandary that that we're in. The platforms are 398 00:23:45,480 --> 00:23:50,760 Speaker 1: very fun and useful Facebook, Instagram, they're super effective advertising platforms, 399 00:23:50,880 --> 00:23:53,119 Speaker 1: and there's not a lot of controls on either one 400 00:23:53,200 --> 00:23:57,880 Speaker 1: of those. And you know, Facebook is imposing controls on themselves, 401 00:23:57,920 --> 00:24:00,600 Speaker 1: but they're doing it because of the scrutiny that they're on, 402 00:24:00,960 --> 00:24:04,840 Speaker 1: not because of what appears to be kind of any 403 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:08,359 Speaker 1: clear standard that they had in place at the time. 404 00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:11,359 Speaker 1: Thanks very much for being with us. Mark Douglas is 405 00:24:11,400 --> 00:24:21,520 Speaker 1: the chief executive of Steelhouse, based in Los Angeles. Thanks 406 00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:24,159 Speaker 1: for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You 407 00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:28,000 Speaker 1: can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 408 00:24:28,119 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer I'm pim Fox. I'm 409 00:24:31,600 --> 00:24:35,600 Speaker 1: on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. 410 00:24:35,720 --> 00:24:38,320 Speaker 1: It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us 411 00:24:38,359 --> 00:24:39,920 Speaker 1: worldwide on Bloomberg Radio