WEBVTT - Skip the Met Gala, Save Your Relationship. Kylie and Timothée Show Us How It’s Done

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, the folks, it is Tuesday, May fifth, Fellas, what

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>do you do? Your woman has a big night red carpet,

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest red carpet in the world. You want to

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>go to a Knicks game, Fellas, what do you do?

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Or should I say ladies specifically Robock, what do you do?

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ.

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Just in that scenario, what's a guy supposed to do?

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Go with his girlfriend?

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Period? Point blank? Yes, doesn't matter. We don't need any circumstance.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't need no context. That's it.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>You support your lady, bam.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, that was simple enough.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 2>All right, what do you think.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some context. I think we need to

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>talk some context. But at this point people might know

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>who we're talking about. One of the most famous or

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>photographed couples in the world at this point didn't show

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>up on one of the most famous red carpets last night.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is a couple that has actually planned

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>their matching outfit together on red carpets before. So we

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>were excited to see them make a met Gala debut.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of watchers were looking it. We

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 2>weren't holding our breaths you and me specifically. But I

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 2>do think a lot of folks were hoping to see

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Kylie Jenner and Timothy Shallomey walk the red carpet at

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the met gala last night. But look a lot of

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>famous female celebrities were missing their other half at the

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 2>met galap Interesting.

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's stick with the one very high profile.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Is there another high profile absence? I guess the Ryan

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds one.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Reynolds not being there with Blake Lively was a

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>big deal, almost understandable, almost understandable giving the News their lawsuit.

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think who else? Obviously we're talking about

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Timothy Schalamey.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>No, Ben Stiller went with his woman. He's a big

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Knicks fan. I can't remember his wife's say. I'm so sorry,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>ma'm I can't remember her name. But he went with

0:01:58.080 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>her to the thing, and he wanted to be at

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks game, and we chose. He even spoke about it.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>He made the right call.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but yes, Timothy Shallow may which Kylie, Kylie Jenner? Okay,

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>met ball big deal. The most photographed red carpet in

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the world with that zephyr to say, I.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 2>Think that's fair to say. Maybe can would that one

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 2>compare me can and maybe.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>The Awesome Maybe? Okay, but I think this is fashion's

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>big night, and this is what the Kardashian Klan, this

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>is what they're known for. Now. Kylie is in town

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>with her bow of how many years?

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Three years?

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is a real relationship.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, this is a real relationship.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Robes is the issue, not that he didn't

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>go with her, but he preferred to be somewhere else.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because he was spotted at the New York Knicks

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>playoff game against the Philadelphia seventy six ers. He's like

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>on the big mega screen, like it was obvious. He

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>made a decision, by the way, for the second year

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 2>in a row, to go to the k next game

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>versus the Met Gala.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't a big deal. This is what he does.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Some folks are saying he.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Snubbed her, snubbed They talked about this. They were together

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>last year. Didn't she go?

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>They have not made a Met Gala red carpet appearance together.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so but she went last year. I assume she did.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's a big deal that he didn't show up

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>on this particular red carpet. It's so obvious where he was.

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't that he was working, had a project out

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>of town, had to be somewhere else. He chose to

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 2>be somewhere else. And I think that's the difference.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Where's the met the met gala is the at the

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy Oh, I thought there's it.

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Up there, the Metropolitan Museum of Art. I'm tough. It's

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the Upper West Side.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I can't give you the exact well I'm saying.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's literally forty fifty blocks south.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, because I think it's I thought it was in

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the eighties, like eighty one or something around there.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>In Madison Square is at thirty fourth.

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, he is fifty blocks away.

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Literally fifty blocks away, and chose to watch a basketball

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>game then go be by her side at this thing. Now, Robes,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we can't take him to task or anything else because

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what's happening in that relationship. And she

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>might have been this might have been a very easy

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation for them.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, she might have been like, babe, do your thing.

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to make you be somewhere you don't

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>want to be I'm with my sisters. She had Kendall

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>there with her, she had Kim. I saw Kendall and

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Kim for sure. So she had a Kardashian klan alongside. Yeah,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 2>we saw Kim aka Jane Judson. Is that what you

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>called her? And then obviously Kylie had her own names

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 2>that people were calling. The dress she chose like basically

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>a version of Missus doubtfire with a padded nude bodice

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>with nipples exposed, hard to miss her. And then there

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>was Kendall. Kendall had something on that was not controversial

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>at all, but not surprising, all right.

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But to this point, you we both would assume that

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>she was She gave the okay for this. He did

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>not defy her or anything. Right, we don't know. We

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, we don't know. I'm saying as we sit here,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we would just we should give them the benefit of

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a doubt that as a couple they made this decision

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>and they're just fine with the decision they made.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I think that you can assume that that's possible,

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 2>but also the other could be true as well. In fact,

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>l magazine has a whole article about the boyfriends who

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>skipped the met gala, and so I think that's kind

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 2>of funny because I think, you know, if you choose

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 2>not to show up alongside your gal, you're going to

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>be called out by magazines and certainly publications that are

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 2>covering the red carp.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Right then, the next thing is should you be I

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>know it, should any guy be criticized for not going

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>alongside his woman when we don't know what that relationship,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>what that dynamic is. Quite frankly, Kylie might not have

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see his ass on the red carpet anyway,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>wearing some rat boy outfit not being offensive. I'm saying

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he's known as that thing.

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but he's got his own style and

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously she likes it.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>He's got great style, He's got perfect style given all

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the stylis he has available to him. So I don't know,

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe she didn't want I'm saying, why do any of

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys get criticized immediately Ooh, something's up he's not there.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Because when you're not by your woman's side on a

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>very big night where there are a lot of cameras

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of focus, it does raise eyebrows. I

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>know a couple of the other big name celebrities who

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>were without their dates. We had Hayley Bieber. Justin Bieber

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't show up, but he doesn't show up to a

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:39.239
<v Speaker 2>lot of these things.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>That reads is what I was doing.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Zoe Kravitz, Harry Styles. But they got a lot of

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>questions swirling around there. Don't want to do engagement or

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>non engagement, So I can understand maybe why they wouldn't

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>want to be there. And let's see who else wasn't there.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, Laurence Sanchez didn't walk the red carpet with

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Bezos. He slipped in the side, but he was theirs.

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was it was his party.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>He paid for it, so he can walk in any

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>door he wants. But yeah, those the Ryan Reynolds, Justin Bieber,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Harry Styles, and Timothy Schallamey. We don't know where the

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 2>others were, but we know where Timothy Chalomey was. And

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that's why maybe he's drawing the most heat

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>or the most criticizing.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>This is where I would say he had a very

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>good excuse and a very terrible one. As much as

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I was playing Devil's advocate earlier, guys, you have to

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>go you just do. I know they're dealing with some

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 1>different level stuff when it comes to celebrity and pr

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and all. They got all these machines around them. But

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>just as the gesture goes, and just on a relationship level,

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>an evening this important, this big two folks in the

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>celebrity world, fashion world, you're not going to get photographed

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>or talked about anymore than all this night, and on

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this night that people know you're in a relationship, a

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>night that is this important to you. It's impossible that

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't want the man you love next to you.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's impossible, even if we say, oh no, it's okay,

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 2>it's okay, if you go to the game. Deep down,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I would think, at least I can only speak from

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a girl's perspective, you would want him beside you at least.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And I don't. I just think that they may have

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>come to whatever agreement that they wanted to do. They're fine. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>but you know, you're opening yourself up for people to

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>ask questions. And maybe that's a good thing. Maybe they

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>want people talking about them and maybe not showing up

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>on the red carpet together. I had more people talking

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>about them than if.

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>They had, because we wouldn't have been today.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise, and lord knows, the Kardashians know how to get

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>people talking about that.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But no, I have no issue with this. I have

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>no issue with what they have decided to do. I

0:08:54.679 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>would take issue in a regular relationship where you're your

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>woman has a whatever. Maybe it's just a special luncheon

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>at work that she's getting honored for. Maybe there's just

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a big group night out that's very important to her,

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and she doesn't want to show up alone. No matter

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>how important of a game, no matter how good of

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a seat you have is. No, you cannot put her

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in a position to ask you to come. You have

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to know automatically this is a big deal for her,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and unless she tells me otherwise, we're going yeah.

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 2>And I don't even have to ask you. I know

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>that even if you had court side seats to a

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 2>Knixt game during the playoffs, you would still show up

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>at an event with me. I'm not even talking if

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 2>it rose to the level of the met Gala. I

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 2>actually think if it was even anything else, you would

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>still say, Babe, this is what this is what you

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 2>do in a relationship. I will sacrifice, and I will

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 2>be there with you.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I wouldn't even say it like that. We're doing

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>our thing tonight and we're skipping the game. I'm trying

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a bet. Example. I'm trying to think would be something

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the Razorbacks are doing, and I'm trying to think, Okay,

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Final four, Orange Bowl, These would be different conversation. And

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, if the Razorbacks were playing for the

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>national championship of college football, you would skip the met Gala.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely agree, And I do think that there are

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 2>ways in which, when you really do love someone, you

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>see where that person's passion lies and you know that

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 2>that's that's something that actually rises above whatever your needs

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>or your wants might be, and that's what Maybe maybe

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>they're all showing us how really in love they truly are.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Kylie Jenner is showing us all how it's done.

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that, yes, even at that big of a yeah,

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's there's nothing romees think about this. There's nothing more

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>high profile or important on the calendar in Manhattan than

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the Met Gala and the Nicks and the damn Playoffs,

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and that couple decided to split responsibilities and grace both

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of those events with their presence.

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there you go the other party. Now, now there

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>are other people online. When we come back, we're going

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>to talk about this. There are plenty of folks who

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 2>believe that Timothy Shallomey and Kylie Jenner deliberately chose not

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>to walk the red carpet together. Not because the Knicks

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>were in a playoff game, not because they're good for

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>each other and their relationship supporting each other's needs. No,

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 2>because they were trying to avoid what some have called

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the Met Gala curse. And welcome back everyone to this

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 2>edition of Amy and TJ. I'm sure everyone noticed a

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of folks pointing out that some women were solo

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on the red carpet at the Met Gala last night,

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 2>New York's biggest night for fashion and certainly celebrities. All

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 2>eyes around the world are on that red carpet leading

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 2>up to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and notably, one

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest couples I guess period around the world,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Kylie Jenner and Timothy Shallomey. Timothy shows up at the

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 2>NIXT game while Kylie is walking the red carpet, and

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>they have never made a Met carpet. A Met Gala

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 2>carpet debut they haven't made it together. They haven't been

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>on that red carpet together. They've been on other carpets,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 2>just not that one. And apparently there is plenty of

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>chatter online that if you show up and you're kind

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 2>of a newer couple, if you show up on the

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 2>red carpet together, you got about a year and then

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you're over. And there have been articles written about the

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>couples who have walked the red carpet and months later

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 2>they're over. Do you believe in the met Gala curse?

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>No? No, And I believe some of these folks were

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>dating for five minutes before they went to the met Gala,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and so shocking they broke up five minutes later. What

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, the list.

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Is hilarious, It's very funny. I play, yes, it does. Oh,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>by the way, on this list, Yahoo actually has a

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 2>list of They go through the pictures of all the

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 2>celebrity couples that have broken up over the years after

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>attending the met Gala. And I was laughing because there

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>are some repeat offenders on the male side. The Weekend

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>had a couple of them. Who else was I laughing

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>at the Weekend was with Bella Hadid one year and

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 2>then with Selena Gomez another year. That neither one of

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:34.479
<v Speaker 2>those lasted long. Shawn Mendes has made a couple appearances

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>here on this list, So that was funny. And I

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>just got a kick out of seeing some of these

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 2>couples that I forgot were even together. Miley Cyrus and

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Liam Hemsworth though that was actually a married couple.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>They went back and forth for years, didn't they? Ye?

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>They where are they now? They're not together?

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 2>They're not together. No, Miley is engaged to another and

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I Liam, I you know what. I can't keep the

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Hemsworth brothers straight. We've discussed this on another podcast. I

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 2>can't remember who's with Chris is with the Schwarzenegger right what?

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was with Schwarzenegger's daughter, Catherine Schwarzenegger. May

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 2>am I getting those messed up?

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>That's what one of the prats. That's hilarious. That's the

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 2>other the other boys?

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god?

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>See I can't even get the Chris is separated.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>How many scarsguard are they?

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Please? Can we stop?

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So listen to Miley Cyrus and Liam Hamsworth, who were married.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>They were off again on again a lot. They attended

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 2>in May of twenty nineteen. They broke up in August

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of twenty nineteen. I mentioned mentioned Shawn Mendes. He showed

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>up with Camilla Cobeyoh, they were a hot couple. They

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>showed up in May of twenty twenty one and broke

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>up in November of twenty twenty one. And then who's

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>he with now, Shawn Mendes, I don't know, but he

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>showed up with Haley Bieber one year. That was in

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen. What Yes, Shawn Mendes and Hailey Bieber were

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>together in May of twenty eighteen. Broke up in June

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 2>of twenty eight.

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>That's probably why some of the guys don't attend. They

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see all these other guys. A woman's dated.

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you do start to see people's pictures popping

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>up and again, which is fun. Kim Kardashian brought Pete

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Davidson one year. They May of twenty twenty two, broke

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>up in August. A lot of these are like a

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>contreme to the end of summer. You weren't shocked by

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>these breakups?

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Play these breakups? He said, Wow, I really thought they

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to make it.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 2>This is very funny. I'm trying to see some other

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>fun ones. Jamie Fox and Katie Holmes showed up in

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>May of twenty nineteen, and they broke up in May

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of twenty nineteen.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Love. I'll leave that one.

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>They broke up weeks later. That's probably the most egregious one.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I still don't remember Selena Gomez in the Weekend being together.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Obviously she's married now, but I don't remember that they

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 2>went from They made it from May to October of

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen, and then they were gone. So that was

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I am laughing at some of these couples that I

0:15:56.040 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 2>forgot existed completely. Amanda Seifried and Justin Long. We love

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 2>both of them.

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an AI picture. I know those two together.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 2>They were together, they attended This Is a while ago

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>May of twenty fifteen. They broke up in September of

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are two of my favorite actors on Earth.

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>We love that.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I love those.

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>They actually show up in quite a few of our

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 2>favorite horror movies too, which is yeah, it goes without

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>saying ASoP Rocky showed up with Chanelle Imom obviously, now

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 2>he continues to show up with Rihanna and they're doing

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 2>just fine.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>We should yeah, we should mention that.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Again, that feels sacrilegious after how much we have said

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>we love that couple together. So anyway, look, the idea

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>is I'm laughing ause Alex Rodriguez is on this list too.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 2>That's not shocking. So yes, maybe it's the people, not

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the events that might actually be a better bellwether as

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to whether or not your relationship may last.

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It is fun, but your advice to women in that

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>situation would be what.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>You don't want somebody by your side who doesn't want

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>to be there. So I wouldn't put the pressure on.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 2>But I do think it's okay to say it would

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 2>be really important and it would mean a lot to

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>me if you could do it. If you can't, I'm

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>cool with that because I support you and I love you.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the best way to handle let as

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 2>a girlfriend. And if you say it, you have to

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>mean it. Yeah, I can't say it and then have

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 2>an expectation that he's actually going to do what you

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>told him he didn't have to do.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly why you would say it, because you're hoping

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to say the right thing.

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>You probably are hoping, but then you also have to

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 2>accept if they don't because you gave the offer, and

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 2>I think that is the right thing to do. I

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 2>don't think I think you can tell them. I would

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>like for you too. I would hope that you would,

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>but I assure you I will not hold it against you.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 2>That is love, what true love would I think that

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>would dictate that method, And then you have to stick

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to it. You can't say one thing and then hold

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>it against him for not doing what you told him

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>he could get.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And my advice to the Fellows is don't let your

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>woman get even close to asking that question. You have

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to stop it before she even has to say will

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you go with me? You all shouldn't have to go

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>through that conflict at all. The thing we have to

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>do you have to recognize and understand that she wants

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you to be there. Now, some relationships are different, and

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe she doesn't want you to be there, but rowe

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>short of your alma mater being in the national championship

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at the final four and you getting a chance to

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be assistant coach that night, it has to rise to

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>such a high level before you would even say Hey, babe,

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think I could it? Just and most of

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the times it doesn't rise to that level. So not

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>criticizing Timothy Schalamey and their relationship. They have their understanding

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so never, but it was just such an interesting question.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>As soon as I saw this one, I said, hey, babe,

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>what would you do?

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think we both said the right thing. And look,

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 2>it is individual, but it was still interesting and I

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of fun looking at all the couples

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 2>who didn't make it past the met Gala red carpet.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>And with that everyone, we always appreciate you listening to us.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Amy Roebuck alongside T. J. Holmes. We'll talk to

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>you soon.