WEBVTT - Kissinger, Musk, CRE, and AI

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is now on your dashboard with Apple CarPlay and

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto. It gives you access to every Bloomberg podcast,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live audio feeds from Bloomberg Radio, print stories from Bloomberg

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>News in audio form, and the latest headlines of the

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>click of a button with Bloomberg News. Now it's free

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>with the latest version of the Bloomberg Business App. That's

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Get it on your phone in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Just download

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, connect your phone to your car and get started.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's all presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven News.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot Com slash podcast.

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>We want to bring in Bloomberg TV's David Weston for

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a conversation on the life and legacy of Henry Kischinger. First,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring you part of David's discussion with

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg opinion commist Neil Ferguson, who wrote a book on

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the life of Henry Kischinger and spent extensive time with him.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's part of their discussion on the role of Kissinger

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 2>played in the Yamkipoor War.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 3>For Kissinger, the moral imperative in the Cold War was

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 3>to avoid World War three, and that was one of

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the reasons that he pursued a policy of deton of

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 3>understanding of improving relations with the Soviet Union, because I

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 3>think reasonably he thought the worst possible outcome for the

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 3>world would be a hot war between two nuclear armed superpars,

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and so in practice, when he entered the realm of

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>power as Richard Nixon's national security advisor, I think he

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>remained an idealist, but an idealist who was having to

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>deal with some extremely difficult choices between, as I've said,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 3>greater and lesser evils. So I don't think the idealism

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 3>was ever entirely eradicated. Certainly, working with Richard Nixon, you

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>were working with somebody who saw himself as a very

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>tough realist who wasn't afraid to do very difficult and

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 3>even nasty things. So I think there was an element

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>of compromise just in accepting a job with Nixon. But

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>once Nixon has gone, it's very interesting to see Kissinger

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 3>under Ford shift in a much more idealistic direction, and

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of Kissinger's later career, about which one hears

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>much much less, owed a lot more to his earlier

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>roots in German idealism.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>It was Bloomberg Television's David Weston speaking with Bloomberg Opinion

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Calmnesst Neil Fergus. I want to bring in David western

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>right now. David, thanks so much for joining us here

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 2>in our Bloomberg studio here.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 4>What a life. It's been your life, my life.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>That has been US diplomacy, whether it's official or nonofficial,

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>it's been Henry Kissinger.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's been the only diplomat i'd ever heard of. Frankly,

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean when you first pointed, I was in high school.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Actually I'm old enough to remember that when Richard Nixon

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 5>appointed him. But and as Ray Dalio actually just posted

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 5>something saying this, you can't think of it who studied

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 5>history as deeply as Henry Kissinger did as an academic

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 5>at Harvard. He would have had a distinguished career in

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 5>that and then lived the diploma say was responsible for it,

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 5>and then got to know pretty much every world leader

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 5>and didn't just know them. They hung on his every word.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 5>And that's China, that's Soviet Union, that's anwar, Sadat and

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 5>Egypt around the world. I mean, it's quite strang If

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 5>you read his book on leadership, he goes through the

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 5>six leaders that he had respect for. He starts with

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 5>Charles de Gaulle, who we knew personally, and he goes

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 5>on to Conrad Adenauer, whom he knew personally, and Maggie

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Thatcher thinks it's really extraordinary life wow.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 6>And David, you knew him personally as well. So maybe

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 6>if you could tell us a little bit about some

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 6>of your memories with Henry Kissinger and what you'll think

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 6>of him most.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say, I'm not sure Henry would say

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 5>this if he were here, But he sort of adopted

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 5>me when I came to New York in the mid nineties.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 5>I think he took pity on me and took me

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 5>under and he used to invite me to breakfast that

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 5>he had with like twenty people or so at a

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 5>club where he'd have visiting dignitaries in people he'd known

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 5>through the years where we'd have an off the record

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 5>discussion about what was going on in Asia, in Europe

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 5>and the Middle East, and it was wonderful. It was

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 5>one of his experiences. And so he really and I

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 5>had lunches with him where he would He was a

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 5>teacher forever and he wanted to teach you, and he

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 5>had an amazing mind. You could agree with them, you

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 5>could disagree with them, but he had thought it all

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 5>through many times, and he could explain to you how

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 5>everything was connected to everything else. He was already fastening.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Last thing. He was a huge dog person.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Really.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 5>He and Nancy loved dogs. I mean, I can't believe

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 5>they always were with a dog constantly. And he was

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 5>a charming, actually very warm man in many ways.

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing what did he think of what's happened, not

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 2>just the United States over the last five six, seven years,

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the nationalism America first in the US,

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>with Brexit in the UK and the elections. It seems

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>like internationalism, which I think you and I kind of

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>grew up with post World War Two, is not necessarily

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the leading role or the leading thought here in international

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 2>relations these days.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, these are my words, not his, but I think

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 5>he would say it's dangerous. We have to remember he

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 5>came out of Nazi Germany, fleeing it in nineteen thirty

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 5>eight with his family as a Jew, and he studied.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 5>In his work. He started with the post Napoleonic Wars,

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 5>putting it together Europe and talking about the balance of powers,

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 5>people like Metternik that he really valued as a way

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 5>to avoid war. He wanted to avoid conflict at all costs.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 5>And I think he would say, if we were here today,

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 5>there are real dangers in everybody going to their respective

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 5>corners and fighting with whether people get hurt that way.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 5>And in fact, he talked about this just last month

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 5>was the last time I saw him. He appeared live

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 5>at the Al Smith dinner here in New York, and

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 5>he gave a speech on this very subject, warning people

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 5>about the dangers here that we have in front of

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 5>us if we keep going this way.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, one of the bigger parts of his legacy was,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 6>of course brokering the peace in the Middle East, and

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 6>certain hearkens now to what we're seeing between the Born

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 6>Israel and with Hamas. So did you speak to him

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 6>more recently to know what he was thinking as far

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 6>as the conflict now, or what you might imagine he

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 6>would have to say thinking about this current conflict.

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't want to be so presumptuous as to

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 5>speak with him for him, but I think he would

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 5>definitely say it's very different in many respects. The attack

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 5>was different hamas terrorists going in and slaughtering children was

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 5>different from a surprise attack from Egypt. In Syria and

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Israel at the same time, there are some parallels because

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 5>what happened there if you remember, is Henry Kissinger with

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 5>President Nixon, came in strong on the side of Israel

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 5>and shift them a lot of weapons and material and

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 5>support in the early stage. But then there was a

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 5>pivot where they started saying, Israel, you've got to back off.

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 5>You can't go too hard against Egypt. And in fact,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 5>at one point he really interviewed very forcefully because he

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 5>was concerned that if Israel tried to destroy one of

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 5>the armies of Egypt, which they could have done, the

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Soviet Union would come in and there'd be a shooting war,

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 5>and we ended up with US against the Soviet Union.

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 5>So he actually played a key role in saying to

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Israel you've got it back down, and he had some real,

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 5>real conflicts of gold in my ear at the time.

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 6>And of course Israel he's getting different pressure now to

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 6>back down, not for fear of Russia coming into the conflict,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 6>but kind of similar to what we're seeing now in

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 6>that sense.

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 2>David, some of the criticism of mister Kishinger maybe as

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 2>a release to human rights.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 4>And his pursuit of global diplomacy.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>What he would say, what I've read, would I'm making

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>some hard choices here, and some of the hard choices

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>might result in some human rights being violated in.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Various places around the world. How did he deal with

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 4>that or how did he talk about that?

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, he did talk about it, and I would say

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 5>he would deny this. I would say he was a

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 5>bit defensive particular things like Cambodia. But you can't talk

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 5>about the legacy of Andrew Kitchen without talking about so

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 5>of the countries, with Cambodia and the so called Secret War,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 5>with what happened in Chile, with the coup, what happened

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 5>in Argentina, and even what happened in Pakistan. But I think,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 5>I think and Walter Isaacson also wrote a book about

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Henry Kustinger quotes Henry quoting a version of Gerta that

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 5>basically said, if you make me choose between injustice and

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 5>order and justice and disorder, I will take injustice and order,

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 5>I think, which comes partly from his background, because he

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 5>saw what disorder in World War two in Europe could do,

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 5>and so he did make some tough decisions. I'm sure

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 5>he would say the session and he would say, look,

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 5>I can't say I was right. I just tell me

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 5>would have been better? Give me what the better alternati

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 5>would have been at the time that was the one

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 5>that would preserve the most order that we could have.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 6>When we're thinking back now to the war that we're

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 6>seeing in the Middle East, and you know, current Secretary

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 6>of State Anthony Blincoln, he's gone out to Israel to

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, to speak with the officials over there. Do

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 6>you think that there would like, you know, speaking onto

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 6>How you think that the current Secretary of State and

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 6>really what their role is in this conflict, and how

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>it's different from Kissinger's roll back at the Camp David Accords.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Ironic, isn't it that we're seeing shuttle diplomacy even as

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 5>we speak right now with Tony blinkin over there in

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Israel and going to Romala, going to the West Bank

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 5>and trying to keep things under control as much as

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 5>they can. It's ironic, it's very difficult because, I mean,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.599
<v Speaker 5>for those of us who are around, Henry Kinsinger was

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 5>larger than life. I mean, he dated superstar models and

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 5>things like that, and he was on the front pages

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 5>of paper all the time, and he had such a

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 5>powerful position in Nixon. I'm not sure there are figures

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 5>anywhere right now that are loom Is large. But I

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 5>think what we're seeing from Secretary of State Blincoln and

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 5>from President Biden right now is a version of what

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 5>Henry Kinsinger tried to pursue, which is basically, let's talk

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 5>to all the parties, figure out where the interests are,

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 5>find the right balance, and keep things under control. Even

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 5>if we can't come to an overall solution of the problem,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 5>let's manage the problem and try to minimize the damage

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 5>and yes, the loss of human life.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>David mister Kissinger was one of the architects of Dayton

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 2>with the Soviet Union. What were some of his thoughts

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 2>about the rise of Vladimir Putin kind of what we're

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 2>seeing from Russian activities over the last decade or so.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, he obviously, I suppose, thought that that was very

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 5>dangerous and very risky and a much different situation to

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 5>what we had before, in part because actually Russia today

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 5>is not as powerful as the Soviet Union was then.

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if we think back to that Cold War,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there were two superpowers they're scaring up. If

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 5>there are two superpowers today, it's China and the United States,

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 5>and Russia is a smaller player, which in some ways

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 5>makes it more dangerous because they feel they have less

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 5>to lose and they feel that they have more to gain.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 5>And certainly, if you read what Vladimir Putin says, he

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 5>feels he was really done wrong. Russia was done wrong

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 5>with the fall of Wall, and he's got to resume

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 5>restore that prestige, which makes it more dangerous.

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 2>China, I mean, that's the new thing that I mean,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine he's very happy with what's kind of

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>chilled over relationship over the last four or five six

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>years between US and China.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, perhaps his last international trip was to Beijing, very good,

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 5>where he got to meet with President gi personally, when

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 5>else nobody else in the United it could meet with

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 5>President G. G you wanted to do with him, And

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 5>you can underestimate the reverence point that the Chinese leadership

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 5>has and has had for generations for Henry Kissinger. Now,

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 5>part of that is part of the culture. They really

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 5>revere the elderly people who have a lot of experience.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it reminds me actually of Charlie Munger right now,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 5>where Charlie Munger said, boy, you get a good executive,

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 5>you keep him there forever. You don't turn them over

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 5>five or six years. But the Chinese really revered that.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 5>But also if you think of from China's point of view,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 5>imagine where China was when he went there first and

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 5>where it is now and would it have gotten there.

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure it would have gotten as far or

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 5>as fast without Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon, because it

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 5>was Richard Nixon's idea. Henry Kinsinger implemented it, but it

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 5>was actually Richard Nixon's strategy.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>David, thank you so much for joining us. David Weston,

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 2>he is the host of Wall Street Week, which is

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 2>one of my favorite brands ever on Wall Street. Wall

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Street Week bearing both on radio and television with his thoughts,

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 2>his perspectives on the extraordinary life of Henry Kissinger, passed

0:11:59.480 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 2>away at the AI.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the Team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 7>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 7>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if the uh the cyber truck thing

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Majiggi's got Apple Play, but we'll check in with our next guest.

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 8>Dan.

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 4>I've held everything about this stuff.

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Dan Ives is a managing director senior equity analyst web

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Bush Securities UH and a Penn State Rabbit fan of

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 2>note there. All right, Dan, I'm seeing the video of

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the cyber truck. I just don't get it. Dude, I

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>don't see It's not a truck man. I can't throw

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>a ball of hay in the back of the truck.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 4>More importantly, why are you carrying builds of hay?

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, because I'm gonna get I'm a rancher. Maybe I'm

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna get a ranch, you know, thinking about that. I

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>watch I watch Yellowstone. So Dan, talk to us about

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>this cyber truck. What's it mean for Tesla.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 9>This is important. I call it a historical event for

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 9>Tesla and Mosque in terms of this new category four

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 9>years in the making. I mean you got two million reservations,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 9>even if forty percent of those convert base in our

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 9>estimates eight hundred thousand, I mean, this is gonna be

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 9>a new growth vehicle, obviously on the edge the mad

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 9>Max design. But I think this is gonna be successful,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 9>and I think book people like Miller they're gonna be

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 9>driving us around New York.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 6>Wow, Matt, I hope you're listening in to hear that one.

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 4>He's not gonna get his way to sign off on this.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 2>He's got the challenger with the scat pack.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 4>That's enough.

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 10>One.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, we're gonna have to see if it can strap

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 6>in a baby counter in the back, so that would

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 6>be the most important for him. Right now, Dan, tell

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 6>us of what you're so you think this is gonna

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 6>be successful. I'll tell us a little bit about some

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 6>of the projections you've run and just how you know

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 6>breaks down the numbers for us in terms of how

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 6>this is going to play out for Tesla.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 9>Look, the important thing today is about pricing, because that's

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 9>that's really the unknown we think pricing is probably sweet

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 9>spot sixty to seventy K, and that's important. You'll also

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 9>get tax credit there at that level at scale two

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 9>to two and five two thousand per year. As we

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 9>get into twenty twenty five. In terms of units now

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 9>coming out, this is gonna be complex to build. It's

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 9>all gonna be built out of Austin. That's where the

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 9>launch will be today. But this is important because it

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 9>goes back to you know, something we've talked about in

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 9>the show. Lout is a refresh. There's just more categories.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 9>It's part of the Hello effect. Contrast at GM four

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 9>pulling back a little on evs, yet test A Musk

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 9>actually doubled down.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think Elon himself has even said Dan that

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing is, I guess in his opinion,

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of a profitability disaster production disaster. It's so hard.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Can you make any money on this truck? Is there

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>any profitability in this truck?

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Paul, first twelve to eighteen months, no, I mean

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 9>they'll essentially lose money, will be cash on negative. But

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 9>as you get into twenty twenty five, it actually could

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 9>be pretty significant in terms of the accretive level. As

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 9>it all plays out at scale now two thousand units.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 9>We think that's pily max twenty twenty four, probably about

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 9>forty thousand in terms of what they ultimately deliver. But

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 9>this is all about next two to three years. It's

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 9>given them their other growth vehicle, and I think this

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 9>is really the start of just the next fees of

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 9>the Tesla growth story. This is four years in the making.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 9>In terms of today's launch, Dan tell.

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 6>Us a little bit more about the competition that the

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 6>cyber truck is going to be stacked up against. You think,

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 6>you know the Ford, you know F series, particularly the

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 6>F one fifty or that's the best side truck in America,

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 6>is a little bit fifty lightning. Yeah, so the electric

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 6>one there, sure, and then you've got the Ram, the Shelvy,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 6>the Chevy Silverado. I mean, how is this. How's the

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 6>cyber truck you think going to stack up against those?

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, F one fifty, I mean, that's that's the target

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 9>on the back. I mean, they're really trying to go

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 9>for some sort of churn there. You look what Rithan's done.

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 9>The success now, they've had a lot of difficulty in

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 9>terms of building it out. In terms of success from

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 9>a demand perspective, you look at that opportunity, you look

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 9>at what received coming at a GM. Look, this is

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 9>really creating a new category. But it's par the hello fact.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 9>And I think the difference today four or five years ago,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 9>everyone kind of viewed it as Okay, Tesla, they're not

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 9>gonna be successful. Today there's not an auto manufacturer executive

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 9>around the world that won't be watching the event because

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 9>you can no longer just say that it's not gonna

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 9>be relevant. It's actually the opposite in terms of their

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 9>leading in terms of really innovation technology.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Dan, when when you speak with the folks at Tesla,

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>when you also speak to the other auto manufacturers, what

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 2>are they what's the thinking today about maybe the ultimate

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>demand curve for evs over the next five years. It

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 2>seems to have lost a little enthusiasm out there.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, look, I think it's no secret you've

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 9>definitely seen a moderation. But I think the view among

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 9>many in the industry is, Okay, let's say it doesn't

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 9>go to fifty to sixty percent penetration. Let's say it

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 9>goes to thirty forty percent penetration next five six years.

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 9>That's two trillion in terms of the amount of ultimately

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 9>opportunity out there in terms of electric vehicles, So you

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 9>continue to see aggressive push towards this. I think the

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 9>big thing it's price discovery. You're not gonna have eighty

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 9>ninety thousand. You need to be in that sweet spot

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 9>forty to fifty k. And that's what we're seeing in

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 9>terms of that price war that's played out well known

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 9>in terms of what's happening in China. It's really price discovery.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 9>But finally we're seeing some sort of supply demand equilibrium.

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 9>But I don't really see a pulling back GM four

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 9>that's essentially UAW that really forced that hand to pull

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 9>back a little in terms of spending.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 6>So speaking of the economics of this, this is a

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 6>tough time right now to be buying a car and

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 6>to be you know, persuaded and consumers that this is

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 6>the time to be getting really excited about that when

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 6>you have auto loan rates as high as they are.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, certainly the holidays, you know, big time to

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 6>roll out a lot of incentives on price and maybe

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 6>rates if you can. But what exactly is the pitch

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 6>right now to like financially that people might be getting

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 6>excited about this.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 9>Well, the big thing too is tax credit. Tonight' expect

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 9>some more tax credit incentives as we go into twenty

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 9>four from Biden administration, because that's a key point. If

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 9>you go back historically what's called seventy eighty thousand, Now

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 9>you're getting some of these ed vehicles, especially for Tessa

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 9>Why and others thirty five forty thousand. When it's all

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 9>said and done here, you're going to have incentives. But

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 9>no doubt because what we've seen from a rising rate

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 9>environment that's been a huge headwind that does start to

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 9>reverse in twenty four. That's why the comms get easier

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 9>in twenty four. And I do believe we are still

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 9>going into what I view as a golden age pro

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 9>electric vehicle and I think that's why it's important today

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 9>for this event pricing. It's really gonna be a flext

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 9>muscles event from Musk and Tesla.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Uh Dan.

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>The stock Tesla's up ninety seven percent year to date,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 2>clawing its way back to its all time high that

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 2>had a couple of years ago. You've been I would argue,

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest bulls on Tesla, on EV's in general,

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and then by extension Elon Musk. How frustrating is it

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>for you to see yesterday, for example, another situation where

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk really comes into the news in not necessarily

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 2>a good way on a company that's not even related

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 2>to Tesla. How do you how do you and investors

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 2>kind of deal with the Elon Musk risk factor?

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's part of that spider web. I mean, even

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 9>what we saw over AX and obviously you know he

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 9>went to Israel in terms of the trip, and then

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 9>if you look at the interview yesterday, I mean clearly

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 9>there's no gonna be no champagne dinner between Musk and

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 9>Eiger anytime soon. I do think relative to Tesla it

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 9>is a bit contained relative to any sort of like

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 9>brand teroration. But as we talked about, I mean, Musk

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 9>is Musk. He's gonna go to the beat of a

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 9>different drum. That's that's why you have the loyalist. But

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 9>then of course the heaters as well, and that's just

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 9>I think it's more accepted to some extent from a

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 9>Tessa perspective, But no doubt it's a fine balance between

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 9>from a brand issue or any short of deterioration. Right now,

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 9>it's contained, but it's not what you want to see yesterday. Ultimately,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 9>as a as a Tesla holder.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, Dan, thanks so much for joining us as

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>always really appreciated. Dan Ives, Managing Director, Senior Equity Analyst

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 2>at Wedbush Securities. A rabid Penn State nitle Lion fan.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 2>We're waiting to see which Bowl game the Penn State

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>will go to.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Can's a line program Bloomberg

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 7>FLO New York station just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to our next guest, Commercial real estate. Let's

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 2>talk to Scott Kelly, founder and CEO of ATOS Capital

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>or real Estate. He joins his life here in our

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Scott, thanks and welcome to Bloomberg.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about commercial real estate. It is on

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 2>everybody's mind, from anybody who thinks about real estate, commercial

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 2>real estate, to invest in banks that have finance commercial

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>real estate, to everybody else involved.

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 4>An ecosystem. It is ugly out there.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Is it time to dip your toe in there and

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 2>start maybe buying some of these properties?

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think I think it's uglier than even the

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 10>headline news would tell you because there's a confluence of

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 10>events which has really never happened before. First of all,

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 10>the level of commercial mortgage maturities over the next couple

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 10>of years is extraordinary.

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 8>It's like one point.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 10>Five trillion dollars over the next couple of years. Second,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 10>it's a sequical business. And whether it's a hard landing

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 10>or a soft landing, it's a landing. We're not in

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 10>a great part of the economic cycle. There are secular

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 10>trends that are really powerful, whether it's work from home,

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 10>shop from home, stay in an airbnb, move out of

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 10>big cities in the Northeast to the Sunbelt. I mean,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 10>there are powerful secular trends which are influencing the performance

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 10>of different properties. And this interest rate spike has got

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 10>an enormous impact on what's essentially a leveraged business because

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 10>you want to leverage out a lot of the return

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 10>for the real estate to drive equities. And then then

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 10>I would say, lastly, the regulatory environment has changed. You know,

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 10>the for a long time during COVID, it was sort

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 10>of hands off, nobody foreclosed on anything. There was a

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 10>lot of leeway given to bar where. It's just because

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 10>that was the economic reality of things. That's changing as well.

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 10>So all those things put together on.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Anywhere near this space.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 10>Well but but but there are going to be winners

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 10>and losers, you know, and and and I do think

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 10>it creates, like like every disaster, it creates great investment opportunities.

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 10>And you know, there are iconic buildings here in New

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 10>York that are just going to be fine. You know,

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 10>they're not gonna you don't want to seem going through

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 10>the roof, but they're going to be fine. And you

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 10>look at what office owners, as an example, have done.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 10>We're over at the GM building a couple of weeks ago,

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 10>they put in the Savoy Club. You know, is really

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 10>an amenity to tenants. If you go to one Vanderbilt,

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 10>they've got you know, terrific restaurants and a Centurion club.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 10>I mean, all of a sudden, you know, the owners

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 10>I think of these iconic buildings are able to put

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 10>things into keep tenants. The disaster I think is going

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 10>to be for the kind of B and C quality

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 10>properties which are going to have a very hard time

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 10>retaining tenants.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is an a property by the way, I

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>don't care who's talking about this is.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 9>This is.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 6>Will that right now would not be a HQ, not

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 6>going anywhere.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 8>An AOK part of this scale.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 11>So relative to those B and C properties, we had

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 11>Igle Namdar, president of non Dar Realty in not so

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 11>long ago, and of course his firm, he's best known

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 11>for being a big buyer of zombie malls and going

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 11>in at their the lowest price. He's sort of doing

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 11>the same playbook here in New York relative to the

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 11>office properties. Because of exactly what you're talking about now,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 11>he was willing to put a value on the non

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 11>trophy properties, and he said, so, if you go to

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 11>a random building out here in Third Avenue, depending whether

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 11>it's in the middle of the block or a corner,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 11>he said that it could go anywhere for twenty five

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 11>cents on the dollar or seventy five cents on the

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 11>dollar as for where it was before. Does that sound

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 11>extreme to you or does that match up to what

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 11>you're seeing as well?

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 10>No, it does not sound extreme to me at all.

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 10>I would say twenty five cents is more likely because

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 10>you have to understand what the property taxes that and

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 10>the and the operating expenses, particularly of you know, these

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 10>buildings in New York. You know, when rental rates drop,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.719
<v Speaker 10>you can have buildings that can't make any money. And

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 10>I think that's a realistic prospect for some of these

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 10>really bad buildings. So the question is how low is low?

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 8>You know?

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 6>And so you know, something I've talked to a lot

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 6>on this show here, Scott is I've been on this

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 6>journey to buy an apartment in New York, provided for

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 6>great newsworthy content for the show, as well as some

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 6>stress in my own personal life. But something that has

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 6>come up in this latest apartment that I'm looking at

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 6>is that the commercial properties that are on the street

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 6>level are right now perhaps not renewing the leases. And

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 6>what that means then for the residential building above that

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 6>owns this whole building and the income that they rely

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 6>upon from these commercial tenants. So is that some thing

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 6>that you're seeing as well, that like this distress in

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 6>the commercial sector perhaps could have bigger implications for the

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 6>real the residential side, which of course has a number

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 6>of problems of its own right now.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 10>Right, well, yes, And I think the issue is the

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 10>whole ecosystem has to work. Right if if there aren't

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 10>people in the office buildings, the guys selling sandwiches on

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 10>the first floor are going out of business. You know,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 10>if the tenants aren't in residential you know, buildings, it's

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 10>very difficult for the for the ground floor tenants to

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 10>be a dry cleaner, be a you know, whatever that

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 10>services the tenants.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 8>I think the big issue.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 10>That that people don't talk enough about, which has to

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 10>be confronted, is it's going to take a long time

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 10>to work this out, and it's got to be a

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 10>cooperation between government and the property owners and because people

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 10>are going to need a break on property taxes, on

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 10>you know, on zoning regulations and all that sort of thing.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 10>And you know, unfortunately, good public policy which would say

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 10>get these buildings up and running tend to be bad

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 10>politics because you're, you know, kind of giving money to

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 10>people that are viewed as being wealthy and don't need it.

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 8>That's not the case.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 10>I mean the cities, I think in New York's one example,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 10>but I think you can talk about it in San

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 10>Francisco and Chicago and in place South. If you don't

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 10>have a vibrant real estate market, the tax base is

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 10>just going to erode in the cities, and so it's

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 10>going to take a thoughtful, you know, public policy approach

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 10>to moving some of this office space to residential and

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 10>other things, you know. And that's New York's big problem,

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 10>right It's there's way too much office and there's too

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 10>little residential, and so it's.

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 8>Incredibly expected to resone it.

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 10>Well and resonte You've got to rezone it. You've got

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 10>to give incentives to make those changes. And frankly, a

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 10>lot of those kind of seventies style office buildings are

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 10>not you know, particularly able to be renovated into residential.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 10>We did, the company that we're partnered with for our

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 10>domestic effort here did a redevelopment of an office building

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 10>in Washington into residential and it's worked out beautifully. But

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 10>those opportunities are it takes a lot of expertise and

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 10>a lot of you know, help with the government and

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 10>patience to get it done.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 11>So switching gears just a little bit, Scott. You know,

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 11>we've been talking to about this epic opportunity in office

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 11>distressed office here in the US but your real wheelhouse

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 11>over the last twenty years, although I should add you

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 11>were one of the big mds at Morgan Stanley back

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 11>in the day, so your wheelhouse is real estate period.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 11>You have just such a broad base of knowledge. But

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 11>you've done a tremendous amount of investing in China and

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 11>in Asia. You were in China, I believe, in September,

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 11>and you told me privately that it's worse, similar to

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 11>what you're saying about the US, that it's worse than

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 11>what's being reported. So talk to us a little bit

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 11>about China and does that seep into the global economy?

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 11>Does that seep into the US? And when do we

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 11>hear those headlines more so?

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 10>Again, well, I think you're starting to see them now.

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 10>I mean the Chinese property companies. And again, we ran

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 10>a series of private equity funds. Most of our investing

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 10>in Asia, we've been at it for twenty two years.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 10>Most has been in Japan, but we did put six

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 10>hundred million of equity into China in a variety of

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 10>basically joint ventures. Residents are joint ventures to build condominiums

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 10>to sell, and we all remember the lines around the

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 10>block of people wanting to buy these things. There are

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 10>no lines there today. But the issue with these you know,

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 10>this capitalism stuff's a little bit tricky, and these Chinese

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 10>property companies have gotten themselves run aground with terrible capital structures.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 10>And when I say that they've got they've got like

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 10>five different branches of creditors. First are people that were

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 10>buying condominiums that weren't delivered. Second were the construction lenders.

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 10>When that dried up, they then borrowed money from sort

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 10>of private funds that were raised in China. Then they

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 10>went public in Hong Kong, and then they did high

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 10>yield you know, bonds in Hong Kong. So I mean,

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 10>it's a big, big problem, and the Chinese government can

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 10>fix it. It's gonna take a lot of money, and

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 10>it's gonna take a lot of expertise. You know, there's

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 10>no Hank Paulson over there to say, give me a bazukah.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 8>I don't necessarily need to use it.

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 11>But she is pretty much indicated that he's not willing

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 11>or he's not interested in saving. So what would what

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 11>would force his hand in putting in terms of putting

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 11>that money into the market.

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a I think it's a guns and

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 10>butter issue. You know what, there's only so much money.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 10>What are you going to do?

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 8>You know, what are you going to do with it?

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 10>And I think civil unrest is the thing that they're

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 10>really worried about.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 11>And we've seen some pictures of that.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Scott, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you coming into our studio. Scott Kelly, founder and CEO

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>of Atos Capital Real Estate, historically has been investing, as

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Scott mentioned, in Asia, mostly Japan, but also maybe take

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 2>a look here at the US. And to me, it's

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the lipstick building on Third Avenue. When I see something

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>like that trade, I can't wait to see what the

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 2>evaluation is. It could be a big, big haircut.

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cansur Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 7>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 7>thirty sub Topa.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Marty joins us. She's a Chief Technology Officer Whipro.

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Whipro's a publicly traded company New York Stock Exchange w

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 2>IT is the ticker twenty five point two billion dollar

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 2>market cap stocks a year to date up about three

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>point eight percent, So that's good news there. So, but

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us here. Software Company Artificial Intelligence.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Ge tell us kind of where your company fits in

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the tech stack.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 4>What do you guys do it? Whippro So, we are.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 12>A technology services provider and we serve fourteen hundred customers

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 12>across twenty five plus verticals across the globe. We are

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 12>anywhere from managing cloud and infrastructure migrations to managing full

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 12>cloud stack, to application development, to tech support, to consulting

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 12>and strategy consulting. So we are a full service firm

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 12>and I'm really excited to talk a little bit more

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 12>about what we're doing on Jenny I on the.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 13>Show with you.

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, tell us about that. I think you know, this

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 6>year it seemed like the biggest historian AI was well

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 6>Chat GPT, and now it's going on with open AI

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 6>and sam Almon. A bit of a different development there.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 6>But tell us as far as far as investment opportunities

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 6>for AI, what we can expect to see in the

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 6>new year.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 13>You know I see GENEI impacting.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 12>It is going to impact every business and every vertical

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 12>and every technology stack.

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 13>And we know this already.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 12>What is interesting is the categories.

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 13>That are emerging.

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 12>I would specifically put GENEI impact in four specific categories.

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 12>The first one is the entire SDLC process from software

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 12>development life cycle. Internally, we have we have been experimenting

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 12>with this technology for the last ten months and we

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 12>see twenty five to thirty percent productivity gains, you know,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 12>from requirements to you know, testing to everything in between.

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 12>The second area which is emerging is around content generation.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 12>I mean the idea that you're able to reduce how

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 12>much it takes, how much time it takes to create

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 12>content generate content is is quite fascinating and that's where

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 12>we see significant improvement in productivity gains.

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 13>The third area we see emerging.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 12>Is this entire RPA two DOT or the entire idea

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 12>that in the past it was around automation, but now

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 12>it is mostly the new avatar or the reinvention of

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 12>business process optimizations through generative AI. And the last category,

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 12>the way I see it is right now, most of

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 12>us have experienced generative AI through large language models applying

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 12>the same architecture to other modalities other data's structured data,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 12>which will then start to impact these various layers in

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 12>stack that I just referred to. I think becomes quite fascinating.

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 12>These are kind of the four trends I'm seeing beginning

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 12>to at least I'm seeing emerging, and the application of

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 12>these four areas will be fascinating and we'll see what

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 12>plays out in the next year, which will be very interesting.

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 2>So we've heard some numbers from a various technologists about

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 2>the spending associated on artificial intelligence on AI across the

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 2>whole range of industry. From your perspective, how much of

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that spending, that AI specific spending is new incremental tech

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 2>spending or they simply maybe taking their spending from another

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 2>period period of their place in their tech budget.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 12>See, most of our technologists, we don't get a lot

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 12>of budget. When I say that, I say that because

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 12>we are we are very much tied. Technology is tied

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 12>to have business outcomes. You know, it's top line growth

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 12>and bottom line optimizations and growth for us. I mostly

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 12>what we tend to do is start the RGB and

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 12>create the headroom, so to speak, and invest in new

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 12>areas and new technologies. The idea here is productivity gains.

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 12>The idea here is how can I run the business smarter,

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 12>more efficiently with better predictability so that I can generate

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 12>those business outcomes. And when I look at it from

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 12>that lens, it is quite quite interesting the question, because

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 12>the question self is an.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 13>Answer, right.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 12>I mean, you won't get you always have the same pie.

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 12>You'll just have to debat up in ways that that

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 12>that will add generate value for business.

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 6>When we're looking about AI, this is obviously such a

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 6>rapidly evolving space. I would love to hear suba some

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.959
<v Speaker 6>of the biggest lessons and takeaways that you had from

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty three and how you're going to bring that

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 6>into the new year.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 13>Specifically around Jenny I.

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 12>Our biggest learning has been that and it's been a

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 12>good learning, which is experiment fast and move fast. This

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 12>space is evolving rapidly. The number of technology startups that

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 12>we are investing at Whippro. We have venure arm and

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 12>we also do significant amount of work with startups because

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.479
<v Speaker 12>that is how we create this robust ecosystem that will

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 12>then offer the right solutions for our customer problems. We

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 12>are we were very very rapid in terms of investments.

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 12>We announced a billion dollar investment for our firm in summer.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 13>And the idea here.

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 12>Is you invest fast, fail fast, learn from it. And

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 12>what is fascinating to us is because of our investments

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 12>early on, patterns are beginning to emerge. We understand that middleware,

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 12>as an example, in this space, is going to be

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 12>an explosive opportunity in twenty four and twenty five.

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 13>It is a very evolving space. How what does a stack?

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 12>How what kind of stack would emerge out of gen

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 12>AIH the middle tier, middlewars are It's going to be fascinating.

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 12>There will be new startups and new companies born out

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 12>of it with rapid adoption. And those patterns have to

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 12>be recognized early on. And the only way you can

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 12>do that is by experimenting and failing fast and making

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 12>sure that you're able to invest at the right time.

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 2>So, but talk to us about the risk here associated

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 2>with AI. You know, whether it's just data security, privacy,

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 2>all those issues.

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 4>How do you guys think about that?

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 12>We are a very responsible company. In fact, the very

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 12>first tenant when we announce this investment is responsiblely I

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 12>framework and I see this as two sides of two

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 12>sort of a coin responsible and and innovation. I think

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 12>it's going to be interesting in the next few months

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 12>and years. And obviously we all heard about what the

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 12>US come and sign in terms of responsibili framework and

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 12>in terms of privacy and other other implications. I think

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 12>more regulations will emerge, but we specifically here we are

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 12>taking a proactive action, sort of proactive decision in terms

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 12>of how we want to develop, adopt, and productionalize, operationalize

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 12>GENEI based applications. I think this is going to be

0:38:54.760 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 12>more regulated into the future because it is I could

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 12>on data and privacy, for instance, what kind of data

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 12>sets was the model trained on? How what is water marking,

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 12>you know, how does it manifest itself? How do you

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 12>ensure that the output from gender to AI when water marked?

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 12>What are the commercial commercial ways of monetizing or sorry, basically,

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 12>how do you monetize? So all these patterns will begin

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 12>to emerge in the next three to six months, and

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 12>I feel that regulation is catching up in this case.

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 12>This is the first time I've seen regulation catching up

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 12>somewhat faster than in the past in other technologies, and

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 12>I think I think it'll it'll be interesting to see

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 12>how the industry then shifts to accommodate those regulations and.

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 13>Policy changes.

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 6>So last one here real quickly, Suba, so whippro really

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 6>big company. You guys have got two hundred and forty

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 6>five thousand employees based out of India. Tell us what

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 6>the AI adoption is like over there.

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 13>We are in AI first company.

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 12>We are bound to be air plus company because we

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 12>play in the technology space. You're right, two one ff

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 12>three thousand employees primarily based out of India, but also worldwide.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 13>We are a global company and the very first.

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 12>Thing we ended up doing was to make sure that

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 12>we build our own internal Genera to AI platform from

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 12>various use cases.

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 13>We are slated to have all our two and fifty.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 12>Thousand employees on the platform in the next couple of

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 12>months as we roll out various use cases. We're also

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 12>again very very acted in Genera DVII training, so we

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 12>have we are in the process of training all the

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 12>two and fifty thousand employees into in general and responsible AI.

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 4>Yes, all right, so, but thank you so much for

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:47.879
<v Speaker 4>joining us. Really appreciate you taking the time.

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating story, they're fascinating discussions subaut Tatavardi, chief technology officer

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 2>for whippro.

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 4>And I'm Faull Sweeney.

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:15.959
<v Speaker 2>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio