WEBVTT - Poole for Paul, Lillard Trade Talk & Wright-Ins

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by All State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking All State first. Like you know to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one sixty two What's Right with Nick Right?

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Please subscribe on YouTube, click the like button, do all

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of that as we continue to try to climb up

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the YouTube charts. Also Apple Spotify, wherever you listen to

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>your podcast, subscribe there as well. Today's episode is brought

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>to you by Starbucks Ready to Drink Coffee. Tune in

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to the moments that matter with the uplifting boost of

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks Mocha Frappuccino chilled coffee drink available now online or

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>wherever you buy your groceries. As I take a quick sip,

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 2>we have a special surprise for you today. We will

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>unveil that surprise in a moment not quite yet. But

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>before we do that, I must tell you what missed

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the cut on today's show. Here's what did not make

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the cut for today's show. Kyrie doing wide receiver drills.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait for the tweet saying you know Kyrie

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 2>is the most skilled football player of all time as well. Also,

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz says we will lead the

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>league in badass ory. That is not an advanced metric.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 2>And Big Poppy drops a hundred thousand dollars necklace in

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>a sewer. I am being told it was then recovered

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>by hotel staff. That is good. That would be devastating,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 2>so longtime viewers of this show. No, it initially was

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.839
<v Speaker 2>me and my oldest Demanse. When demand moved to LA

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 2>he took a temporary leave of absence for the show

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 2>and was replaced by my middle child, Diora, who has

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>done a wonderful job. Doora has since graduated from high

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 2>school and will be joining us throughout the summer until

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 2>she goes off to college in California. However, we have

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>had two other guests on the show guest co hosts.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>One was Lil Wayne and the other was my youngest Deanna,

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 2>who did this once right around a year ago this

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>week because it was right around her brother's birthday, which

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>is coming up. Well today, Diora was otherwise occupied. I

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 2>did not want to do the show by Myselfana said,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>you know what, Dad, all fill in, so Anna beart.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you, my love. What are we starting

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>with today?

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, right after our last show, the Warriors trade Jordan.

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Pool for Chris Paul yep.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Did go to State find the fresh shirt they needed

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 3>or did they just trade their best young player for

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 3>another guy Draymond does not get along with. Well.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I think both are true. So listen, they had to

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 2>get off Jordan Pool. And it's not just because he

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>was unplayable in the postseason, but it's also because in

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Zach Low, to his credit, made this point a month ago,

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 2>and I think it was a very smart one. They

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 2>are going to ask Draymond Green. I don't know if

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>it's necessarily to take a pay cut, but they don't

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>want to give Draymond Green four years, one hundred and

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty million dollars. Why is that a noteworthy figure? That

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>is the amount of money that Jordan Poole's contract was for,

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and so you can't ask Draymond Green to take less

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 2>than You can't be doing that, Danna can't be It's

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 2>too early in the show to be making fun of me.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It's distracting. We gotta we're doing hardcore sports talk right now.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 2>If you're watching on YouTube, she was already mocking me.

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>You can't ask Draymond Green to take less than four years,

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 2>one twenty if Jordan Poole's on the team. So Jordan

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Poole had to be moved. Also, if you listen to

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Cameron and Mace's show, what they reported that Jordan Poole

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 2>was saying to Draymond Green doesn't give him license to

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>have punched him. But he hit him with some singers

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 2>including why is your handle money? Green? If you're broke

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and so on and so forth. So that relationship was

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 2>torched from beginning. So it is odd that they are

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 2>bringing in Chris Paul in order to move off Jordan Poole.

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>But Chris Paul obviously has a bit of a tortured

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>relationship with the Warriors. Not just three years ago when

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Draymond went on Stack show Steven Jackson Show and said,

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't like Chris Paul, but as recently as this season,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 2>when Steph Curry said to Chris Paul, it ain't twenty

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 2>fourteen anymore. So why did they do this? Well, there's

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the basketball reason and then there's the financial reason. The

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 2>basketball reason is this Warriors team was not able to

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>function when Steph Curry went to the bench, So now

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you have one of the best pure point guards of

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 2>all time. He can fill in those minutes, So that

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 2>makes sense. The non basketball reason is a financial reason.

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>They wanted to move off Jordan Poole's money without tying

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>themselves to long term money. Because if it was purely

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>give us the best team possible for next season, you

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 2>know who they pretty clearly could have gotten. It would

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 2>appear Bradley Beal. Because Bradley Beal went to the Suns

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>for Chris Paul and pick swaps and second rounders. They

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 2>then traded Chris Paul to the Warriors for Jordan Poole.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>You could have cut out the middleman there and orchestrated

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a Jordan Pool Bradley Beal trade. And I understand that

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Beal maybe wanted the Sons. He had a no trade clause.

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I get that part of it, but I at least

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>think that would have been plausible. You certainly could have

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 2>gotten John Collins. You certainly there are other guys that

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 2>were available that I think would have potentially helped the Warriors.

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>More.

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>What those guys didn't have was a contract that expires

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 2>after this year, and with the very onerous new collective

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Bargaining agreement for the super high spending teams, the Warriors

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 2>needed to get off Jordan Poole's money without adding long

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>term commitments, but also with keeping this window open at

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>least for right now. What does this mean for Draymond.

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.239
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna get a contract extension. I don't

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>buy that he's going to the Kings. I do buy

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>that his agent, Rich Paul will leverage the fact that

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the Kings have salary cap space now as a way

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 2>to drive the price up for the Warriors on Draymond.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>But it looks like it's gonna be around on three years,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 2>around ninety million dollars for Draymond Green as they try

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to win one more title with the Draymond Steph Clay Corps. Now,

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 2>last point on this, which is everybody thinks Chris Paul

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be coming off the bench, and I understand

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>why they think that, because if you have Steph Clay

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Wiggins Draymond is have to start, You're not gonna have

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Draymond be your biggest guy. So Looney will be the

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>other starter, and then Chris comes off the bench. Chris

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 2>Paul started his entire high school career, his entire college

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>career except for the game he was suspended for the

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>first half for punching Julius Hodge in the groin, and

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 2>has played one three hundred and sixty three NBA games.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 2>He has started all of them. So we are now

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 2>asking Chris Paul to come off the bench, to play

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>very limited minutes, which I think is good for him,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>and to essentially lay down his sword in the Steph rivalry.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>It's asking a lot of Chris Paul. We'll see how

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>good he is with it. Right now, everyone's saying the

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 2>right things, but we'll see. Deanna, you have a follow up?

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Are you sure you're done?

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I'm done? Okay Uh.

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 3>The follow up question is how about changed CP three's

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>legacy if he wins a ring as a sixth man?

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So well, here's the thing. It helps it, but it's not.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>It is. This is complicated. So like Jason Kidd when

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 2>he won his ring with Dallas, was a starter, but

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>was obviously a lesser player. Gary Payton when he won

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>his ring with the Heat was not a starter and

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 2>was a far lesser player. The best thing for Chris

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Paul obviously would have if they won that finals against

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks. I felt he was the best player on

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 2>that team. He got MVP votes that year. I thought

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>he was league MVP that year. And this is a

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>different situation, so it is not. I actually don't think

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>it is a massive switch the way you know, Jokic

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>going from a guy without a ring to winning the

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.359
<v Speaker 2>ring did obviously, even trying to think of another example

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 2>of someone who late in their you know, this would

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>be more noteworthy than Dwight's ring that he won with

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers, but it would not be the I don't

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>know how to put this is gonna sound petty, but

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 2>it would not be the exact way Chris wanted to

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>win a ring. But my listen, two years ago, Chris

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Paul led the league in assists. Last year he was

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>top five and assists he still has clearly win on

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the court, a very good player. What the reason I

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 2>think this could be good for him is it gives

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>him such a better chance to be healthy in the

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>postseason because his minutes are going to be so down

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>in the regular season. That is assuming he's good with

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 2>that role. But it is a risky move by Golden State,

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>but it is one that cleans up their books considerably,

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and that admits the Jordan Pool Draymond thing that Warrior

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 2>fans were so annoyed with me last year because I

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>kept harping on the fact that that broke the team

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 2>before the season even started. It is them admitting, yeah,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 2>it was not a tenable situation. All right, next, Deanna,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh what ron Daniel? Go ahead? Yep, okay, go ahead.

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 3>You say Dan is getting is getting traded to Miami

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 3>in the next few days.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Would a Dame Jimmy duo be enough to win a title?

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 2>So? I think it absolutely would. Also, it should be

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>noted that last night it was reported that Joe Cronin

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>or it wasn't reported, Joe Cronin said, after meeting with Dame,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>our goal is, you know, to build a championship team

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>around him. That's not possible. If Joe Cronin truly believes that,

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 2>then he's not thinking he's not equipped for the job.

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I happen to believe he is just saying that, and

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>that they are still going to trade Damian Lillard. This

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>is these are diametrically opposed things keeping Damian Lillard at

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 2>this point with the lack of cap flexibility and the

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 2>age of their other potential future stars, they can't build

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>a champion with thirty three year old Damian Lillard with

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>four years, two hundred and thirteen million left on his deal.

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 2>So everyone right now is saying that I don't think

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>that is actually happening, and I don't think it should

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>take Dame demanding a trade for the Blazers to do

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the right thing for their franchise. That now they can

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 2>try to thread the needle on not knifing Dame in

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the back and sending him somewhere he doesn't want to be.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>He has made it clear he would be fine with Miami.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Miami can and I've shown you guys the trade trade

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Hero, Caleb Martin Nikolajovich, Jacques Junior, who they just

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>traded for the eighth they just drafted with the eighteenth

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>overall pick and two future firsts. That's a decent haul

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>for a six foot two inch thirty three year old

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 2>with an average to fifty two million dollars a year

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty three million dollars a year left on his contract

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 2>for four more years. And then you build around Scoot

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Shaden Sharp Simons, I suppose, and those picks and young players.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 2>That's what you do. And now, would a Dame Jimmy

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>duo be enough to win the title? You bet your

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 2>asset would be. Sorry, Deanna, a Dame Jimmy duo. The

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Miami Heat since Jimmy got to Miami lead the NBA

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 2>in playoff victories, The Miami Heat, since Dame got to Miami,

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, Since Jimmy got to Miami lead the NBA

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>in finals appearances. The Miami Heat, since Jimmy got to

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Miami lead the NBA in conference finals appearances. They are

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>not miles away. They have been more successful since Jimmy

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 2>got there than any team in the league other than

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the four teams that won titles, the Lakers, the Warriors,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks, and the Nuggets. And by the way, they

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>have been more consistent than any of those teams. But

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>those teams obviously have been more successful because those teams

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 2>have won the title. But Damian Lillard is the exact

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>type of player they need, a dead eye shooter, shot maker,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>dominant scorer, and the Heat are the exact type of

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 2>team Dame needs, which a team built of solid defenders

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 2>that can offset his limitations on that end. It just

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 2>makes sense. And a trio of Bam, Jimmy and Dame

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>might not be the most talented trio in basketball, but

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a trio of those three fit together as well as

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 2>any trio in the East, and I think any trio

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>in the West outside of the one in Denver which

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>just won the title with Jokiic's Jamal and I think

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the third best guy's Aaron Gordon. So to me, this

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>is a trade that makes sense for Portland and it

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>makes sense for Dame, and Dame doesn't have a no

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 2>trade clause, and because of that, the Portland Trailblazers need

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>to be the adults in the room and decide that

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 2>this is what is right for their franchise and they

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>need to turn the page. And even if Dame is

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>not demanding it, it shouldn't take Dame demanding it for

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>it to be what they do. All right, Deanna, what's

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>next here? Huh yeah, go.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Ahead, Auntie, Yes said the.

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Bills, you're skipping one. Let's do the Wimby one. Oh,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, don't worry about it.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>You said that on TV Wimby would be a Hall

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 3>of famer. M h and everyone thinks you're way too

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 3>low on him.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Yep, mm hmm.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Is this level of hype going to be good or

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 3>bad for him?

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>So here's here's what I find so interesting about where

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 2>we are with Wimby, because you're exactly right. I said

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 2>on TV that I thought he would be an above

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 2>average number one pick, which means he's going to be

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 2>a Hall of Famer. It means you'll probably win a

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 2>League MVP. And of all the people talking about him

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 2>on television, I'm probably the lowest on it. That's crazy.

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 3>That is.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>An expectate he if he becomes a rich Man's Anthony Davis,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>people are gonna be disappointed by him. That is unfair. Yes,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not gonna freak out about him missing those

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>shots in the warm ups that everybody saw. And the

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 2>reason I'm not gonna freak out about it is because

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I already knew he's not a good shooter. And that's

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 2>where I think the media has done a disservice to

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 2>the fans. The media has done a disservice to the

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 2>fans because they have presented him as if he is

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 2>this seven foot five kid that is a dead eye shooter.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>He is not. Now, he has good form and he

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>shoots well from the free throw line, which gives you

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>optimism he could become a very good shooter.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry to interrupt. He's seven foot five.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's why everybody loves him. What Yeah, he's seven

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 2>foot five. Who Victor Windin Yama, This nineteen year old

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>French kid. That's why he's the number one pick of

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the draft. That's why everyone loves him.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Is he in college?

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, he's from France. He just got drafted by

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the Spurs.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 3>What what teams he on?

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>No, he's going to be on the Spurs. But he

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 2>didn't play again Slatan France San Antonio. So he he

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>has some of the building blocks that you feel could

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>make him a good shooter. But two years ago for

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 2>his team, he shot twenty eight percent from three, and

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>last year he shot twenty seven percent from three, And

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 2>so this idea that whoa. He can shoot over everybody.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 2>He's always been able to shoot over everybody. He has

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 2>not been a good range shooter. Now do I think

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>he'll improve? Of course, I think he'll improve. Scoot is

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>not a good range shooter either, and scoots a foot

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>plus shorter than him. I get that. But people are

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 2>not calling Scoot Henderson a guy that's gonna be League

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 2>MVPN three years, the greatest prospect in American sports history,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and it is. I made this point on the podcast

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 2>last week. I'm gonna make it again. The most. He

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 2>is receiving more hype than any player we've seen since Lebron,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>And even though Lebron handled it as well as anyone

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>we've ever seen handle that level of hype, it got

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 2>to him in those twenty eleven finals. You could see

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:48.719
<v Speaker 2>and feel it crushing him. And we're setting Wimby up

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 2>for something similar. And the fact that I could go

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>on TV and say I think his rookie year he'll

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 2>average nineteen points eight rebounds and lead the league in

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>blocks and people say I'm too low on him is

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 2>all the evidence you need that we've gone crazy on

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 2>the expectation for this kid. Wilds on TV said he

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>thinks he's going to duplicate Shack's rookie season. I strongly

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>disagree with that. Shack had a year of college basketball,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and Shack's body was NBA ready, So I just I'm

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 2>excited to watch him. But I really hope that we're

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 2>fair to this kid, because it does not feel to

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 2>me like we are going to be and that is

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>going to put a burden on him. That is unrealistic.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>The best guy straight out of college ever or straight

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>into the league was Kareem, but Kareem had four years

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>at UCLA. Duncan would be next, probably he had four

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>years at Wake Forest. Shaq and Lebron would be Bird

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and Magic obviously as well. But birded four years at college.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 2>Magic only had one, So I guess maybe that's the

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>that's the hope. But Magic had an NBA body, and

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 2>I know that Wimby has. You know, he's gonna be

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the tallest player in the league, and I think defensively

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 2>he will instantly be dominant. I do believe that, But

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 2>offensively he's a work in progress, and I think people

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 2>need to prepare themselves for it. All right, last, Diana,

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, We're on the AFC East.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, I know we're on.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, last time you didn't you started this one?

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>He did the wimby.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Thing er I think up on my apad that says

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 3>undue trash or leave me alone.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, sorry, go ahead?

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Uh On TV, you said the Bills have the most

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>pressure on them this year. Yeah, through sad, Yeah said

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>it was the Jets. Yep, which AFC East team is

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 3>most likely to be playing for a championship and which

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>one is most likely to be looking for a new quarterback?

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Don't take a long time this time, because each each

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.719
<v Speaker 3>response has been taking about seven minutes.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're right, I mean we are now. We are

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 2>now in overtime. So I do not feel like this.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 2>There is overwhelming pressure on the Jets to not be

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a disaster. But if the Jets go twelve and five,

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 2>win the division, and lose in the AFC Championship game,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 2>it is the second most successful season in the history

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of their franchise. It's a great year. Oh if the

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Bills do that exact thing, it's a disappointment. And so

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 2>there is inherently more pressure on Buffalo than anyone. There

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>is real concern that the Bills missed their window, and

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 2>now that window can reopen at some point, but that

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>their best chance to win was the twenty twenty or

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one seasons, and in twenty twenty, the Chiefs

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>dog walked them in the AFC title game. In twenty

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, they blew a lead to the Chiefs in

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Round two, and then last year they were the most

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 2>hyped non Super Bowl defending Super Bowl champion I've ever seen,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 2>and they got blown out in a round two home

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>playoff game after almost losing to a third string quarter

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>back in Miami. And so it there is, And then

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 2>there's the whole digs Allen drama and the fact that

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Sean McDermott is going to be head coach and defensive

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 2>coordinator this year. There's a lot writing on this season

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>in Buffalo. And so if I were to talk about

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the teams under the most pressure to improve on where

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.239
<v Speaker 2>they were last year, yes, the Jets are in her

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 2>massive pressure to improve, but to win a championship. I

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>think there is no one under more pressure than Buffalo.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing, Deanna? What are you doing? Talk?

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh you're saying I went too long? All right, take

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 2>a quick break, come back, play a game What's Right?

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 4>inspiring true story about Anthony Robless, who defined every expectation

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 4>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 4>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 4>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 4>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 4>including Juelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Canavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome back in and guys, let me tell you something.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So my life moves fast, as you guys probably know.

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I've got two shows. I've got kids, you know, some

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 2>of which are all of which you've gotten to know

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>over the course of the podcast. And some days I'm

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 2>dragging and I could use a pick me up. Starbucks

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 2>ready to drink coffee delivers that uplifting boost that helps

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 2>you tune into the moments that matter wherever you are.

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Bless You, Baby Bottled Frappuccino chilled coffee drink is inspired

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 2>by Starbucks Cafe Favorites and comes in four delicious flavors, Mocha, vanilla, caramel,

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 2>which I'm drying right now, and coffee flavored. Of course,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 2>I like to start my day with some type of coffee,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 2>especially when I'm recording a new episode of What's Right.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>My go to is Starbucks ready to drink coffee for

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>that uplifting boost I need to conquer the day. And

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a wide range of Starbucks ready to drink coffee drinks.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Whether you want to grab one of the Starbucks frappuccino

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 2>chilled coffee drinks like this one, or a Nitro cold brew.

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 2>There's so many good choices for whatever mood you're in.

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks Coffee ready for right now. Shop the full lineup

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.199
<v Speaker 2>online or in stores wherever you buy your groceries. All right,

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 2>this is episode one sixty two. It's time for a

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 2>game hold on. But I should remind you guys. You

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 2>guys can in the chat on YouTube writing questions or

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>comments if you for our c block or our segment

0:27:55.800 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 2>after this, I or Deanna will answer the questions. You

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 2>can ask questions for Deanna that I will ask her.

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>You can ask her questions if you'd like, or you

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>can keep it just as sports and ask me stuff. Deanna,

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 2>how do you think you did that first segment?

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 3>I did really good. I think that you have to

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that you have to minimize the talking.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's literally the purpose of the show.

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>No, but you went a lot over time, and that

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 3>took a lot of time away from this segment.

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the show we can go as long as we want. Well,

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>did it take a lot of time away from this

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 2>segment or do you feel it took time away from

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 2>when you could be talking?

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>No, I didn't say that, but you.

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Seem to be. Do you feel like you got enough

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 2>time to talk in that segment or you should have

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 2>had a little more.

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I think I should have more. You wouldn't let me

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 3>say anything because when I was trying to say something new.

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that's yeah, because you know you're not as

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you didn't know who Victor Winmnyama was, So how could

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 2>you be? You were shocked seven foot five?

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so was Sissy.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so she listen. That's that's fine, I think, Deanna.

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you on a scale of one to ten,

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you an eight point two for that segment.

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Pretty good.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Okay, you're gonna get more embarrassed as saying because

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 3>you gave me eight point two.

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's fine. What game are we playing?

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 3>We are playing writ ins.

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, go ahead. Kevin Durant look at the screen to

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>me as a kid demands, is a tea shirt? All right?

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead? What's the question?

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I want everybody to focus on that picture and remember it.

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Take a screenshot with your phone.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, go ahead.

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Durant joined the Twitter space over the weekend called

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Durant is not top five? It's five to debate

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of fans. You're Katie's social media manage. Yeah,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 3>your advice.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Is to change nothing at this point. Ever since Durrant

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 2>got rid of the burners and is just fully in

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he is super online and will argue

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 2>with randoms and join some jokers Twitter space to argue

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 2>that he is top five. I love it. I mean

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 2>I think he is. He has become one of the

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 2>more authentic superstars we have in all of sports. Also,

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't live tune into this space, but I saw

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>some of the clips that were floating around Twitter. I

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 2>love the fact that Durant immediately gets these guys to

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>lay down their swords. I love the fact that these

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 2>guys fold their hands the moment he pushes back on them. Now,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 2>can you make a strong argument that Katie's not top five?

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course you can't at this point in his career,

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 2>because guys that we yokichinianis are unquestionably better than him.

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just no undeniable. It is hard to argue right

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>now that he is better than Steph. Now we're at three,

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and then there is the tricky question of is he

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 2>even better than Devin Booker. I think so, that's his teammate.

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Others would say no, is he better than Lebron? I

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think so, and he'd be like, oh, Lebron's hurt

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Lebron plays more than Durant. Is he

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>better than Luca? That's at least an argument. Jason Tatum, Well,

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the last time they played in the playoff series, Tatum

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 2>seems swept him. So listen, do I think Durant's I

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 2>didn't even mention Embiid because Embiids right now, despite winning

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>MVP Stock is you know, taking a massive hit because

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of the playoffs. Do I think Durant's top five. I do. Actually,

0:31:54.320 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I think currently the five guys you would most want

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 2>want in a playoff series are and I'm not ranking

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 2>them in order, but the five are Jokic, Giannis, Steph, Durant,

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and Lebron. But you can make an argument he's outside

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 2>of that group. But these guys were making it. Then

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Durant pushed back on him and they they they just

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 2>immediate were like, okay, Katie, what's up, Dana. You wanted

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to say something.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 3>You sort of sort of took what I was gonna say.

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 3>But I'm gonna, yeah, go ahead, sort of fish it. Yeah,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 3>the top five, I agree with you. Yeah, but can

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I rank them?

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Sure? Yeah.

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I think Lebron is first sometimes.

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Sure, sometimes, but he can't do it all the time anymore.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>But go ahead.

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 3>That's why I said sometimes.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good okay. Number two.

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Number two I would think is either Yogic.

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Or Steph Okay, So that's two three, and then there's

0:32:59.040 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Giannis and.

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Durant, and then I think it would be Yannis and

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 3>then Kevin Durritt.

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say that's not a bad ranking, Dianna. I

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>think you're underrating Giannis a bit. But that's not a

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>bad ranking, that's pretty good. And I like the fact

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 2>that I've instilled in you to put Lebron number one

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 2>no matter what. All right, Deanna, what's next?

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh? Okay next? Some of the best in college basketball

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 3>players went undrafted, yeah, ken, including including the National Player

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 3>of the Year and the Final Four's most outstanding player.

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 3>To fix college basketball and c A must.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Do nothing, guys, it's okay that, oh, well, I understand

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>this and change nothing and then nothing. I don't. It's

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 2>okay that what makes someone a great college basketball player

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>is not necessarily what the NBA is looking for. It's

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>okay that it's different skill sets. And it's okay that

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a player like Drew Timmy can be awesome in college

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 2>basketball and not looked at as a great future pro.

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 2>We're used to that in college football. We're used to

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 2>guys being potentially great college quarterbacks who we don't think

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 2>are going to be pro quarterbacks at all. I mean

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 2>is thirty years ago, but a guy in Charlie Ward

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 2>won the Heisman Trophy playing college quarterback and then had

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to go play basketball because no one in the NFL

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted him to play quarterback. Now, so I don't look

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 2>at that as a problem with college basketball. The problem

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 2>with college basketball is it, I don't want to say

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the problem. What I think college basketball needs to figure

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 2>out is how to make sure the majority of guys

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 2>who are playing college basketball want to play college basketball

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and are not simply using it as a vehicle to

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 2>get to the NBA. And then you can have more

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 2>teams that stick around together for two, three, four years,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you get to know them, and you can have great

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 2>college teams. Once again, the forcing guys to go to

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 2>college via the one and done rule, I think has

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 2>had the opposite effect that people hoped it would have

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>on the college game, because, yeah, you are getting more

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 2>talent in the college game, but it's there for such

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.479
<v Speaker 2>a short period of time. There's no continuity. You can't

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 2>have long standing rivalries, all of that stuff. So if

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 2>we had more Drew Timmy's guys that are not going

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 2>to be necessarily NBA players at all, but you get

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 2>to know them over the course of their college career,

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 2>that would be good for college basketball. But it is

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 2>not an inherent problem that great college players are not

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 2>necessarily sought after in the NBA draft. All right, Next, Deanna,

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Next thing, is the Dennis Rodman question, Oh you knew, Sorry,

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 2>my bad, go ahead.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 3>Dennis Rodman said, if Larry Bird played today, he'd be

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 3>in Europe and that yo kid is way better than

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Bird was. Your offensive Rodman is, I'm gonna guess nothing,

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 3>but like no, my.

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Defensive Rodman, he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 2>It's just it's undeniable. How dumb this is? Okay, Larry

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Bird would be able to play in any era. Now,

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 2>will Jokic one day as a higher ranked player than

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 2>byrd I'd say that's very unlikely, but it's not impossible.

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 2>But Bird came into the league and his first nine

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>years in the league was first team All NBA. The

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 2>idea that that guy, now, thirty years after he retired,

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be able to play in the league, it's just

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 2>it just shows a total lack of understanding of birds

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 2>basketball acumen IQ passing ability, and one could argue, with

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 2>the emphasis on three point shooting that Bird would be

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 2>a more dominant offensive player. You can already make the

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 2>argument Bird's one of the five greatest passers of all time,

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and he came into the league in the eighties pre expansion,

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 2>when the ABA had folded and the NBA was totally stacked.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 2>And this is how Bird's first nine years before his

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 2>back went out, how he finished an MVP voting fourth, second, second, second, first, first, first, third, second.

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 2>That's good, It's unbelievable. So it's unbelievable. So his rookie

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 2>year he was fourth in MVP voting. His next six

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 2>years he had finished second three straight times, and then

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>first three straight times, and then the next two years

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 2>finished third and second. You don't need to clap for him,

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 2>but that's very nice of you. He is one of

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the best rebounding forwards ever, was the best shooter of

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 2>his generation and is one of the best. I think

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 2>only Lebron's been a better passing forward than him. So

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 2>of course he wouldn't be playing in Europe. And of

0:38:55.800 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 2>course it's a ridiculous, ridiculous opinion. All right, Next, uh

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the uh.

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Producer? How do you know my script?

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I know everything about this show. I you know I'm

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>running the whole thing. Go ahead.

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Producer Daniel appeared on air last week. Then he then

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 3>was spotted on the subway going the wrong direction by listeners.

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Zach Bromfield, Yep, your relationship with the producer Daniel. Is

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 3>is that your script on your computer?

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a script. I do everything off the

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>top of my head. I'm just following along on your script.

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>But my relationship with producer Daniel is better than ever.

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 2>And this is an unbelievable story. So if you weren't

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 2>watching last week's podcast, producer Daniel was in from La

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 2>came on the show, stopped by, and he and I

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 2>got to meet in person. I don't know if I

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 2>did or didn't apologize for my mean comments about him

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 2>on the air during the NBA Finals and Western Armor's Finals,

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 2>but I think he and I repaired our relationship. He

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 2>then was on the subway and Zach Bromfield, a listener

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 2>or viewer of the show. I don't think he had

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 2>seen him because the email Zach sent. I'm gonna read

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 2>you guys, the email Zach sent to us because it's

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty unbelievable. Uh, let me find it real quick. Where

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 2>is our group chat? There? It is? So the email

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Zach sent reads his following. While I was taking the

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 2>subway home from work last Thursday, I spotted Anikola Jokic

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 2>sweatshirt on my subway car. I want okay, so he

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 2>did watch. I watched your show earlier that day and

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 2>saw producer Daniels sporting the same sweater. I figured there

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 2>could be only one person in New York City with

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 2>that distinctive sweater. I decided to approach him and say hello.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Daniel and I discussed the show as nuggets and a

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 2>mutual friend we have. As we're pulling up to the

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 2>next stop, Dan goes time to ask the embarrassing question,

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 2>is this train going uptown or downtown. I let him

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 2>know the train was going downtown. I could see the

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 2>embarrassment come across the space. We took a quick picture,

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and I directed him to the other side of the

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 2>platform where the uptown train was. While producer Daniel can

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 2>proudly boast about a nugget, you can tease him about

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 2>taking the subway in the wrong direction. So thank you

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 2>for that, Zach. I love the fact that producer Daniel's

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 2>getting recognized on New York City subways. I also love

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Daniel, once taking the subway, once he

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 2>started taking the subway in the right direction, then missed

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 2>his stop and ended up forty minutes out of his way.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 2>All of this was a delightful story, and I hope

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 2>he had a great trip to New York.

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, last one, Deanna, Okay, I'm gonna answer this one.

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, go ahead, you got it. Where's your iPad screwing

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 2>you up? Oh it's not opening it all right, just

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 2>read it off, read it off my computer. It's the

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 2>last one about Demanza. I okay, go ahead.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Demand tweeted that he's gonna make a criminal amount of

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 3>money being betting on sites this year.

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, on betting sites, betting on sports yep.

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in reality, demondsey Will.

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 2>What's the answer in your opinion, demands Will?

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 3>What? I don't think a criminal amount of money, but

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 3>I think he will make money and lose money. I

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 3>think all together.

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I think at the beginning of the year, yeah, he'll

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 3>win a lot of money. But then I think around

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 3>in the middle, he's gonna lose a lot. Yeah, but

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 3>that I think at the end he's gonna win some money.

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 2>So you think he's gonna end up a net winner ahead,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 2>win more than he.

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 3>Loses, win a little bit, winning that.

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Would be a huge win. I you know this. This

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 2>tweet was about his concerning of any tweet as I've

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 2>ever seen him send him just tweeting randomly in the

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 2>middle of summer. Can we put it back on the

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 2>screen at ten o'clock at night? Him just you know,

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 2>fantasizing about the amount of money he is or isn't

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna win. That is not a great sign.

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And can I call something out right?

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 3>Wait, who just I'm not gonna say what I think

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 3>because it's not like I can't say it because I'm

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 3>a kid. I can't say it. But I think that

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 3>night he went to like a party or something, and then.

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 2>He had a couple of drinks.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's what I thought. I was gonna say, like

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 3>he got drunk and then came home and it was like,

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna I'm just gonna tweet this because well, I.

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Don't think that's what it was, because Demands has been

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 2>really grinding at work in LA, so I don't think

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 2>he's been partying much.

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think I think I know my brother, Yeah,

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I know my brother pretty good.

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 2>You think he'd had a few adult beverages and then

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 2>was fantasizing about sports betting. I've created a monster. We

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.720
<v Speaker 2>answer your questions live in the chat.

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 3>Call me.

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be happy with you. We do all that.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Next What's Right?

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in What's Right with the Great Episode one

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:27.399
<v Speaker 2>sixty two. My youngest Deanna Uh filling in for her

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 2>big sister Diora, who has been filling in for the

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 2>last couple of months for her big brother demanse uh.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, for our producers, if we get

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 2>more questions or comments during the sea block that you

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 2>guys want to throw in the doc, h, We've got

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 2>a little time here so we can maybe answer a

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 2>few more. Kabeb Goat and Eric Capaero Deanna, they say, uh.

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Eric says Diana's the best co host you've had, and

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Kabib says she's by far the best co hosts makes

0:44:58.560 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the show far more entertaining.

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, demands and Diora, if you hear this just didn't

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 3>come from me, but I am gonna brag about this

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 3>to Sissy when I get home. When she gets home,

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 3>can say that.

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Sebastian Carascillo, apologies if I'm mispronouncing your name. Sebastian says, Deanna,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 2>what's the worst habit your dad has?

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's a lot, but it's probably smoking because I wait, no,

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 3>don't say anything, uh, because I've told him to stop

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 3>many times. Wait. I have a story. Once we were

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 3>in I don't know where we were, but it was

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 3>a vacation, and and I woke up and me and

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 3>my dad, I think, were the only people on a

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 3>certain floor and I caught and I caught him smoking,

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 3>and he says he wouldn't do it anymore. And then

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 3>he said he pulled me over and said, Deanna, you

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 3>better not say this to your sister and sister and

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 3>your and your mom. And I didn't. And still I

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 3>still didn't because they don't watch this, okay, And so

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 3>and then my papa was here and my dad smoked

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 3>like four that night. That was no. No, no, I

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 3>was in wine.

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 2>We were smoking cigars.

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 3>No, how men bond, No, it's not not certain. Sure

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 3>it's how men bond, but not with their dad.

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Well he's okay, all right, Listen, it's a lifelong struggle.

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't smoke nearly as much as I

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 2>used to. It's on the rare occasion. But that's fair.

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Mark Pasqual asks me, aside from Dame in Miami, what

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 2>other move could make a team become an instant contender. Well,

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously Damed of Philly. I mean, there's a lot of

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>would and they're already a contender, but that would up that.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 2>As far as teams right now that are not contenders

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 2>that could become one, I am. I'm not a fan

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of this player, but I'm interested if Karl Anthony Towns

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 2>gets moved. I don't listen. I don't believe in Karl

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:26.959
<v Speaker 2>Anthony town Sorry, but the maybe it's a Minnesota problem

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and not a town's problem. He's been there a long time.

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 2>I think Dame is likely the only real needle mover

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 2>that would be on that is likely to be on

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the move this summer. Joe asks Deanna, do you think

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 2>it's cool your dad's on TV?

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 3>It's cool, It's cool, but sometimes very annoying.

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Why what's annoying?

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 3>The cool part is that like when we're playing never

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Have I Ever? Like once in Robots, we were playing

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 3>never Have I Ever? And then the question was have

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 3>you ever met a famous person? And my friend was

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 3>and I said yeah. My friend was like, who'd you mean?

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 3>And I said my dad? And then but the part

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 3>that I really don't like is that every time I'm

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 3>trying to hang out with him. He I don't think

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 3>if he's walking in New York, I don't think there's

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 3>a day where he would go without somebody saying to him, Hi,

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 3>what's up? It's Nick right?

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 2>But that.

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Bothers you, yes, because you take a full selfie with them,

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's like it's annoying because I just try and

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 3>say hi and they completely agnored me. And also also

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Mommy said the other day, what oh when you and

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:58.839
<v Speaker 3>since you were at the dinner yesterday, that if somebody says, oh,

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 3>is that Nick right? Since you she said, no, it's not.

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I'm gonna do next time somebody says that,

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna yes, it's someone else. Yeah, I'm gonna say alike, okay.

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Padrino Q asks me any advice raising kids who are

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 2>uniquely different in different stages of their lives. How do

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 2>you manage your ambition to make time to be present

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:22.760
<v Speaker 2>for their ambitions or These are two very different questions.

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:25.720
<v Speaker 2>The first one is raising kids who are in different

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 2>stages of their lives. I man, that's really hard, and

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 2>it is like, I don't listen. Parenting is difficult. I

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 2>can't imagine how difficult it is to have if you

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 2>have three kids that are in similar ages, because then

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you're dealing with toddlers at the same time. We have friends,

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 2>good friends of the family that own the ice cream

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 2>shop next door. No, I don't want to say their names,

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 2>h but and they have won three amazing children. But

0:49:58.360 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 2>their age is.

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 3>What five, five seven and ten?

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Five seven and ten.

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's really hard because I've been to their house

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot going on.

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 2>It's just hard. It's just hard having three young children

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:14.479
<v Speaker 2>the same time, and then eventually they're gonna have three

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 2>teenagers at the same time. All of that.

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 3>But the problem I don't.

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to You're fine, baby, I wasn't.

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Talking about them anymore.

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 3>But the problem with having spaced out is that's more

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 3>years of parenting.

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I there is that, but it's also like your

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 2>kids just have different needs and you want to help

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:37.319
<v Speaker 2>all of them. Yeah, and so that listen, there is

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 2>no right, I don't. I try not to be in

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the habit of judging anyone's parenting. We're all or almost

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 2>all of us, I should say, are just doing our best.

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 2>There is no handbook for it. Most well, there's some

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 2>parents that just don't care, you know what I mean.

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:53.759
<v Speaker 2>But the vast majority of us are just doing our

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 2>best and trying not to screw our kids up. But

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 2>it's hard. How do you manage your ambition and make

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 2>time to be present for their ambitions? I struggle with that. Yeah,

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, rock you.

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Do, and I it's hard. Something that's not just with you,

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 3>though it's with mommy. It's it's literally with everybody older

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 3>than me in this house. What that was like when

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I say I want to do something with them, I

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 3>don't want to do that. Like they get to say

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:27.720
<v Speaker 3>on everything and I get nothing.

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, you get nothing, but you are the.

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 3>Again like one per se.

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you have the smallest voting share, but it is Listen,

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 2>that part's hard, and it's like you're weighing it, Like

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to provide the best life. I've talked about

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 2>this on the show Force, so I have to go

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:43.479
<v Speaker 2>at length at it. You want to provide the best

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 2>life and opportunities and safety and security for your family,

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 2>but also I you know, it's not like I do

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:51.319
<v Speaker 2>my job purely for my family. I do it because

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:53.359
<v Speaker 2>I love it and it's my dream. But you also

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:55.800
<v Speaker 2>want to balance it with theirs. So that part is,

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's very difficult and there are certain trade offs.

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Like Deanna was Charlotte in Charlotte's Web. Yeah, it was

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:09.240
<v Speaker 2>only there was only when she was she was also

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Annie in Annie. Well that what I wouldn't have missed

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:15.359
<v Speaker 2>for anything that was like the big school play.

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 3>She didn't watch that, I wouldn't do it.

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 2>And you got cast for the lead Charlotte and Charlotte's

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Web was your act drama class. And they had one

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:27.799
<v Speaker 2>performance and it was four o'clock on a weekday, and

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 2>I just I, you know, I guessed that I have

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 2>on the on mommy's phone. I haven't seen the they right, Well,

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the school, let's set that side. The school has emailed

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 2>out the full link. I think they forgot to. But

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, that was a choice I made. It was

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 2>during the NBA finals. Am I gonna miss a whole show?

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 2>Or am I gonna miss Deanna's thing? And I made that.

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think I made the right choice. But

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 2>it's a hard choice. So that stuffs hard. It's just

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 2>flatly hard. Uh Uh. This is a much easier question, Nick,

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 2>what's better bone in wings or bone out wings? But

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 2>it's obviously bone in wings, wings with bones on them. Yeah,

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:11.959
<v Speaker 2>it's either like chicken wings or like what I would

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 2>consider chicken nuggets or chicken tenders, or well, like the.

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Bone with bones on them. Is there any more questions

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 3>for me?

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Sorry, Deanna? Do you want to follow in your

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:27.360
<v Speaker 2>dad's footsteps? Or now do something else?

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I should know?

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you want to do? I mean, I know,

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 2>but tell the audience and use your don't don't go

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 2>to your baby voice, use your adult voice.

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, No, it's strong.

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 2>No, you don't want to do sports stuff. What do

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 2>you want to do?

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I want to be an actress, right like your sister.

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:49.359
<v Speaker 3>Not because of my sister, though.

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I understand maybe my dreams. I'm not spitting on your dreams.

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I support them. I think you're wildly talented. I do

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 2>think you were inspired as a very very.

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Very well you wanted to be an actor.

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 2>You think it just came naturally to you. I think

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 2>you might be right. You're a very talented performer. You're

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.879
<v Speaker 2>a very very You and de Or are both very

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 2>talented performers. And I think, I mean, listen, you, you

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 2>were the youngest person or the second youngest person that

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 2>was auditioning for any role in Annie, and you got Annie,

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:30.320
<v Speaker 2>and then they cast you as Charlotte's Web is Charlotte

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and Charlotte's Web without an audition?

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Can I say something about Annie?

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Sure? Is it gonna? Are you gonna regret saying it?

0:54:37.400 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, go ahead.

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 3>I I also at the beginning of the at the

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 3>point where Annie was going on, it was it was

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 3>also my first year at the at the school. Mister B.

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Youre probably watching this right now. I'm okay with you

0:54:56.440 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 3>hearing this. It was a very hard time from you

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 3>that point. Yeah, because not that many people like liked me.

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, you were new, you were new, Yes, go ahead. Sorry.

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And then when I got it.

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 2>It like.

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Literally I was sobbing. I know, I was so happy.

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.280
<v Speaker 3>And then I came to school that day so happy.

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:26.479
<v Speaker 3>So I came into my playgroup. Everybody started clapping, and

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:28.359
<v Speaker 3>I just.

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 2>What was the mister b part of it?

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:32.799
<v Speaker 3>It was about my.

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 2>School and oh, you were saying, mister Bee's probably watching

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 2>even though he's a Raiders fan, He's probably watching. Deanna.

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 2>You did wonderfully. I'm very proud of you. You will

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 2>do it again this summer. This was episode one sixty two.

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 2>We will be back on.

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 3>There's no more question.

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:51.239
<v Speaker 2>No, we're done. The last one is well, there's one

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:56.760
<v Speaker 2>more comment. Lloyd rob Otham Robotham says Deanna is built different.

0:55:57.200 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 2>She might be the coolest kid her age. So there

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you go. That's nice one to end on. All right,

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk to you guys on Thursday. What's right. Bye,