WEBVTT - Montana Bans TikTok and Alibaba's Spinoff

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard. We're Innovations, Money and Power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and Karen hide A Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>and Ludlow is off on a well earned vacation as

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg Technology Coming up, TikTok banned in Montana. It

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>marks the first US state to sign a law banning

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 2>the social media app across all phones. Will discuss the

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>legal and logistical implications of the move past. In today's

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 2>VC Spotlight, we speak with a speak with an early

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>AI investor, Serilgo, the founder at VC firm Conviction and

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 2>former general partner at Graylock, and we bring you all

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the tech stocks. Moving on earnings, we take a deep

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>dive into Ali Barbara as the e commerce grant pans

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>as spinoff for its club business.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>And much more.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 2>First, let's check in on these public markets, because once

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>again there's real risk on sentiment around the Nasdaq. We're

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 2>off more than a percentage point at the moment to

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 2>the races one hundred and thirty four points to the upside.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a bit of a relief, it seems as though

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe that debt ceiling debarcle. We're inching closer to some

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>sort of respite to that with. Of course, though, have

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>a strong jobs number coming out, and that is what's

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>affecting the two year yield up some five six basis points.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>We're still thinking about whether the Federal Reserve really has

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 2>to curtail the overall strength of the economy, the inflation

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>some FED speak speaking to that today, we're looking at

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin currently off by nine tens and percent. That's because

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 2>basically every single currency pair in FX is also down

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 2>versus the US dollars. We think about where the Federal

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Reserve has to go, let's move it on. It's like

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>at some individual movers because ED is out, I'm going

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>to play on the micro today. Cisco off by three

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>tens percent as they really show some of the draw

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>down in spending. Remember this is the company that provides

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 2>equipment for basically networking all our Internet access, and they're

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>seeing more than a twenty percent drop in recent business.

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing Ali Barbar also off by four percent. Doesn't

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>manage to ignite that optimist particularly after the reopening of China.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>To a certain degree, they're not managing harnessing that growth,

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the cloud area, even as we get more

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 2>detail on where they will spin off the groceries unit

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the cloud business as well. We'll dig into that later

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 2>in the show. Netflix interesting look at this rally up

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 2>basically to ten percent. We know why they gave us

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>some evidence of the growth that they're seeing in the

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 2>advertising part of the model. They're going out to upfronts

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>for the first ever time, basically where they pitch to

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 2>advertise as the where's the content they're coming and people

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>really liked what they heard. Relief were up almost ten percent. Meanwhile, though,

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 2>let's really dig into what is the top news agenda

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 2>today in terms of tech. TikTok now officially from January

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 2>first band in Montana setting up a legal battle in

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the state, and the social media company is already facing

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 2>some heavy scrutiny from the United States more broadly in

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>terms of its lawmakers joining us some more bluemegs, Alex Borinka,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and just first dig in on what Montana has said,

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be incredibly difficult to.

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Enforce, incredibly difficult to enforce. So Montana has said governor

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>signed into law a bill that would basically restrict or,

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 4>they say, restrict use of the app, but the owners

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 4>would actually be on TikTok and the app stoor so Google,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Apple app stores, who would, as they say, be fined

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 4>ten thousand dollars a day for every day that TikTok

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 4>is made available. But it's really unclear from this bill

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 4>how they're actually going to enforce it, and certainly, Caroline

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 4>this bill will face a legal battle. This is a

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 4>state basically kind of making a decision to limit an

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 4>app only within its borders, while the federal government itself

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 4>has been looking at it. But something like this is

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 4>pretty unprecedented. The company has told us that this is

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 4>a regulation on a free speech they have pushed back

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 4>on it. We've actually already seen a group of creators too,

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 4>because this bill was signed in the late hours of

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 4>last night. So certainly a really interesting move by some

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 4>who are pro banning TikTok would say, good job Governor

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 4>of Montana for restricting this on national security concerns. But

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 4>critics of this bill would probably say, hey, why is

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 4>this state kind of getting involved in what should be

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 4>a federal move.

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 2>And maybe this puts the onus back on a federal

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.679
<v Speaker 2>move Alex, but remind us the ways in which TikTok

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>has tried to alleviate concerns from a national security perspective

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 2>is by saying, look, we're working with Oracle, We're ensuring

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 2>that the data is in any way being accessed by China.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Just tell us you did some really deep dive analysis

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 2>on what that deal is with Oracle in the moment.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 4>Right a callig and I wrote about where it stands

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 4>this deal called Project Texas. Basically, TikTok has put Oracle

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 4>up as this American partner who's going to wall off

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 4>the data for US users to alleviate national security concerns,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 4>and that process has already started. But what we broke

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>this morning is that a large chunk of the really

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 4>ambitious work of Oracle actually reviewing TikTok's code, which is

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 4>pretty unprecedented and being the entity that submits the app

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 4>to the app stores, that work has not yet started,

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 4>even though TikTok has eluded that it has. This is

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 4>all according to a person familiar, and Oracle will not

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>start that work unless there's a final agreement in place

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 4>that the government has signed off on. You'll recall there

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 4>is a national security review going on. It's an interagency

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 4>review in DC, and that has stalled because the Justice

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Department has not been happy. So without that moving forward,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 4>without a final sealed, done dusted, US stamped proposal in

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>place or legislation that forces some kind of move, oracle

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 4>will not start doing that really in depth work that

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 4>TikTok has really used to say, Hey, look your stuff

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>is safe because we have an American partner actually making

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>sure there's no backdoors here for the Chinese government.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating. Alex Blerinka, thank you for bringing us the latest.

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>It's great reporting and the breaking of that NEUS today.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Go read it on the terminal and on dot com. Mean, well,

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 2>we've got to dig a little deeper here, Kyl Zavos

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 2>with us. He's George Mason, Professor of the Internet Law

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and also vice president and general council at net Choice.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Now that's a lobbying group aimed at making the Internet

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>safe for free enterprise and free expression. So and hazard

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>a guess here, Carl that you're pretty anti what we're

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>hearing from the governor and Montanamo broadly today. Yeah, thanks

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 2>for having me on.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 5>This is something that should scare all of us, because

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 5>this is exactly what we don't want the government to

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 5>do and what the government can't do. It can't decide

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 5>what websites we can visit and what apps we can download.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 5>Imagine if this government of Montana came out and said

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 5>you can no longer go to Bloomberg dot com. Of

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 5>course everyone would be apoplectic. But that's exactly what we're

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 5>seeing here with TikTok. At the end of the day,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 5>what we are ultimately going to see is a legal

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 5>challenge on this because this is a clear violation of

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 5>the First Amendment. The government can't ban speech, which is

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 5>exactly what this is. Simultaneously is a clear violation and

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 5>of something called a bill of attainer. It's a legal

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 5>term that we use rarely where you can't criminalize an individual,

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 5>and that's exactly what you're seeing here. So this is

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 5>a slammed don case of unconstitution. But more importantly, it's

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 5>a dangerous precedent against free speech, free expression, and free

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 5>enterprise in the freest nation in the world.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Remind us why thus far they've been able to ban

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>them on government phones.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the bands on government phones. I actually don't have

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 5>any issue with. I'm an employer many employers are watching

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 5>this program right now, and we all have rules and

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 5>restrictions on what our employees can and cannot do on

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 5>their own company devices, and we can say, well, you

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 5>can't go to this website, you can't unload that app,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 5>And so the government is perfectly free to do that

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 5>for their own employees, federal employees, state employees, local employees.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 5>In fact, as a taxpayer, I don't see any reason

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 5>why government employees should have TikTok on their government devices,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 5>because when I'm paying their salaries as a taxpayer, I

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 5>expect them to be working, not producing TikTok videos, not

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 5>watching entertainment videos. So that's why the government can do

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 5>it on their own devices. But it is very different

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 5>from the government then coming and telling me, telling you,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 5>telling everyone else out there what websites they can visit

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 5>and what apps they can download on their own personal devices.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So, as you say, and you've come out saying this

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>is unconstitutional, TikTok has come out saying that it's against

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>free speech. Legal arguments abound, but it does put the

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>owners back on the federal government. And what is currently

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 2>being debated by the administration to either ensure that national

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>security is preserved or indeed courtail TikTok within the United States.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, is there any way that the federal government

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>could anactis do you think.

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 5>The thing at the federal level is TikTok is kind

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 5>of a distraction, it's fig leaf. A lot of lawmakers

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 5>don't want to have an important, necessary discussion on the

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 5>US dependency on China, national security, cybersecurity, or privacy. But

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 5>there is legislation today before Congress that they could look

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 5>to do. They could create a national standard on cybersecurity,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 5>they could look to create a national standard on privacy laws.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 5>And what this will do is it will protect all

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 5>Americans regardless of whether an attack is coming from outside

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 5>the US or from within. Let's remember some of the

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 5>biggest data breaches in US history came from inside the US,

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 5>whether it's solar winds in Texas, whether it is the

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 5>hack last month of the health information of members of Congress,

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 5>or whether it was a government employee deciding to dump

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 5>all of our secrets about Ukraine under the Internet to

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 5>impress their friends. So we need to harden our critical

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure regardless and focusing on one business, one entity, one

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 5>nation distracts us from the important work that Congress must

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 5>do to harden these critical infrastructures and make us all safe.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, when you're looking abroad at what's occurring, we

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 2>are seeing other countries UK, for example, also banning on

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>government devices. Is there anywhere that is thinking that they

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>have to curtail certain social media apps because in this,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 2>of course discussion that's been leveled by Montana, they don't

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 2>just mention TikTok, they also mention other bytedn BITEDOWNCE owned apps,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 2>capcut Lemonade, but also there's Telegram, which they sort of

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>for see having a link to Russia.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 5>So there is certainly one nation that is in the

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 5>business of deciding what websites and what apps it citizens

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 5>can use, and that's China. They have the Great Firewall

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 5>where if the CCP doesn't like what you're saying, the

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 5>citizens can't see it. It's a horrible model for the

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 5>rest of the world. It is the antithesis of what

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 5>America stands for. So I expect the US to lead

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 5>the way to reject bands on speech, reject bands on apps,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 5>and push the notion that citizens and free people should

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 5>be able to decide what is or is not appropriate

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 5>for them, because at the end of the day, if

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 5>I have concerns about TikTok, I just don't.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I just won't use it. I'll use something else.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 5>And that's the freedom of choice. That's the freedom that

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 5>we have here in America, and unfortunately, in Montana, that

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 5>freedom is being taken away from its citizens.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Very briefly, of course, your associate association members are TikTok,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>but they also Amazon, Airbnb, etc. Meta a number do

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 2>your association members currently feel that regulation in the US

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>is working for them or against them?

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, across the board, Netchoice is out there fighting

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 5>every single day to plow the field for free expression,

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 5>free enterprise, and we are all behind the notion of

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 5>creating a national standard on things like privacy law or

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 5>cybersecurity law because at the end of the day, what

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 5>that will do is secure Americans and more importantly, it

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 5>will make it easier for Americans to know how their

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 5>privacy is treated, how their data is treated, and for

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 5>businesses out there, it gives them a simple, easy, one

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 5>standard to follow, which drives down costs of compliance and

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 5>makes it easier to spend that money on innovation. We

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 5>need innovation at the speed of technology. Not at the

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 5>speed of government. And that's what we all agree on, and.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>It would say that as we look at AI and

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>plan the other things being discussed. Kul so Bo great

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>To has some time with the George Mason, Professor of

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Internet Law and of course of net choice.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 6>This uniquely American innovation ecosystem is still the world's envy,

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 6>and I want us to make it stronger. I've never

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 6>seen rapid gains that we're seeing now with frontier language models.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 6>As fast we lead, the world is trying to catch up.

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 6>We're still ahead. Let's continue.

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Of course you recognize him. Former Google CEO there, Eric Schmidt,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 2>testifying a house hearing yesterday which fun Love was focused

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 2>on China's embrace of AI for warfare. He also warned that, look,

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 2>while the US still has an edge in the key

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 2>areas like AI and quantum computing, China is likely having

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 2>more people working on strategic AI and advises that the

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>US must redesign its military to respond to that threat.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk more broadly about artificial intelligence, about what feels

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 2>like a race, whether it's between US and China, or

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>indeed company versus company here within the United States as well,

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 2>particularly when it comes to generative AI. Zerogo, Perfect Voice,

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 2>founder of Conviction. It's an AI focused VC firm built

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 2>to serve software three point zero companies as you call them,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>And of course you've got a long history with gray

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 2>Lock and sitting on plenty of boards there. I'm interested

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>at the moment as to where you're seeing the most

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>value being attributed to AI companies.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having me. We are very early in the

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 7>AI revolution, and I think it's a very general technology.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 7>It's huge potential to improve people's lives and productivity and

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 7>contribute to complex problems in climate and education and science.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>In the near term.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 7>Some of the areas we're seeing the most immediate value

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 7>include democratization of creative capabilities, so giving everyone the ability

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 7>to generate image and voice and video where you used

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 7>to need to develop creative skills. And trying to give

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 7>experts leverage. So think of companies that enable lawyers to

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 7>do their work more quickly, or data scientists to leverage

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 7>their work for a broader business audience. So we've invested

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 7>in companies like Seek and Harvey.

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>In this vein, we're looking at some of your portfolio

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>companies there more broadly, and there is of course, the

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 2>minute you start to say leveling the playing field, democratization,

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to image to voice, copyright concerns come

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 2>to the full How are you seeing the founders that

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 2>you're working with really get ahead of the curve of

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>where regulation could come.

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, I think there's a series of tricky issues that

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 7>companies playing in this field need to consider, and that

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 7>includes copyright, includes disinformation, and it includes abuse of these

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 7>technologies by malicious actors, as you'll see with every technology

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 7>tool like the Internet, of course, and so we expect

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 7>when we invest in companies means for founders to think

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 7>about these issues from a responsible AI perspective from the

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 7>very beginning.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting, of course you've been someone who thought

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot about Web three and indeed the democratization of

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>finance in that way, crypto immediately comes to mind. Some

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>people are trying to compare and contrast the way in

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 2>which the AI ecosystem is looking to get ahead of

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>regulation or lead start asking for it sooner visa the cryptosphere.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 2>But is that our own naivety to realize how AI

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>has been being built, you know, for decades a lot

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 2>of these big companies and certainly the startups as well.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 2>We all suddenly feel like it's brand new and shiny

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 2>because we're now touching it as a consumer. But are

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>we behind the curve when it comes to regulation or

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 2>we're managing to be at a better pace this time.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 7>So this may not be a very popular view, but

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 7>I think we actually need to be going faster on

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 7>the regulatory front. That doesn't necessarily mean licensing, for example,

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 7>to train models. I'd be cautious about cementing the concentration

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 7>of power to the few organizations today in allowing them

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 7>to decide who has access. But in terms of the

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 7>governance questions that come about when you have a technology

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 7>that is so general progressing at a rapid speed, that

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 7>justifies anxiety, and it should justify investment from both the

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 7>private sector and academia and policy makers to understand and

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 7>get ahead of the changes that will come in society.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 7>So I think we're going to need very strong partnership

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 7>between industry and policymakers to reap the benefits of AI

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 7>and mitigate some of the concerns. And we're committed to

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 7>engaging to inform and contribute to that process.

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how are you contributing? Do you feel the administration

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>and those in power off speaking with the right people

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>within this field.

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 7>I think there is a rapid acceleration of engagement from

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 7>both sides over the last few months, and so we've

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 7>been participants in that these are complex issues, right, Managing

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 7>the misuse of AI is something that must be a

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 7>arrived at through an inclusive and democratic process. And it's

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 7>hard because it's also technical, right, if people are hurting

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 7>a lot. But I do think there's an opportunity for

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 7>perhaps pro technology policy making that is, for lack of

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 7>a better term, not just defensive right, protecting against against

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 7>some of the issues that we discussed, but also really

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 7>goes on the offensive, right in that you just showed

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 7>a clip from Eric Schmidt. I think that this is

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 7>relevant from a national security perspective, relevant from a sort

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 7>of economic stability perspective, and also relevant in that, you know,

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 7>be a real shame if some of the sort of

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 7>more ambitious applications of AI in for example, science or

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 7>education were not reached because we didn't get regulation right.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm very excited about there are some companies in our

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 7>portfolio that are in small ways today already contributing to that.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 7>We have a company called co Rise that uses AI

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 7>to reduce the cost of reskilling for workers, And so

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 7>I think there are a lot of benefits that we

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 7>also want to support here.

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, where do you fall on that general optimism pessimism

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 2>viewpoint on whether this can ultimately be beneficial to society

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 2>from a we will get more time to do more

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 2>impactful work or is there a worry that jobs will

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>be reduced and people won't be reskilled at the rate

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that they need to be.

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think it would be intellectually dishonest for a

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 7>technologist working in this field to not have that worry, right,

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 7>And so you know, I founded the firm because I

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 7>believe it AI is a technology of abundance, but that

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 7>won't happen the distribution of that abundance will not happen automatically, right,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 7>And so this is why I think there's a real

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 7>room for you know, nuanced policy making here. And so

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 7>the technology is only good as good as the guardrails

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 7>we give it. But I think like the magic of

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 7>the American innovation system is like technology drives wealth creation

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 7>every There are so many things that are much cheaper

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 7>for everyday Americans than they were ten years ago. Because

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 7>of advancements in productivity and technology, and like one of

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 7>my greatest hopes for the AI revolution is that a

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 7>few of the fields that have been quite resistant to

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 7>decreasing in class, like health and education, we can make

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 7>some inpotes.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 2>On Sarah, I wish I could speak too much longer.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 2>And of course you've got a great podcast we can

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>listen to you, founder of Conviction. We thank you for

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 2>your time today. Meanwhile, coming up, the UK's biggest telecom

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 2>operator is planning to cut tens of thousands of jobs

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 2>by twenty thirty. Well digain. Meanwhile, let's just check in

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 2>on Micron. You might have seen the story scoop here

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 2>every body, but we're receiving about one and a half

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in financial incentives from the Japanese government because

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 2>all about helping to make the next generation of memory

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 2>hips in that country. This is about global supply chain

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 2>and ensuring that it's closer to home. For many from

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>New York, there is a Bloomberg Welcome back to Blueberg Technology.

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hied in New York. Now, let's get a

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 2>check on these markets. Halfway through the trading day. We're

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 2>currently seeing actually some more buoyant signs, particularly in big tech.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Once again, we're up more than a percentage point in

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the moment in terms of the Nasdaq. Some big tech

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>on top will dive into the individual moves in a moment,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 2>but maybe some anxiety draining out when it comes to

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the debt relief and the debt ceiling debarcle that seems

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 2>to be spiraling towards us. That Lexie anxiety is dialing

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>back a little bit, maybe closer to the end as

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>we hope, and currently also seeing the jobless claims coming

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>in strong. The overall resilience of this US economy means,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 2>but it also means inflatory pressure is there. It also

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>means the US dollar is going higher as the Federal

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Reserve might just have to keep on thinking about tightening

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>its grip on inflation. We're looking at Bitcoin off by

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 2>more than a percentage point as the dollar rises. Turn

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 2>your attention though to some individual names, because I do

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>want to look at some of the higher siders in

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 2>video up three point eight percent. Again, this company just

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 2>continues to benefit from of course the ai A law,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 2>but also remember it's still bringing us new GPUs and

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 2>some of its new trips are going to be serving

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the gaming community in particular people liking that Apple up

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 2>more than nine tenser percent. I'm thinking of gaming. We

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 2>think about that mixed reality headset. We're expecting that June fifth,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>We're going to dig into that with Mark Germ and Cisco. Though,

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 2>on the downside, and one of the biggest point drags

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 2>on the overall NASDAC today. We know why they of

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 2>course seeing lackluster orders for some of their equipment of late.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about other perhaps lackluster areas when it comes

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to earnings and Ali Barbar are really not managing to

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 2>show much strength. It's shown in fact weak at e

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 2>commerce sales and perhaps have been expected. We're down by

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 2>four point eight almost five percent on the ADRs. Here

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 2>how the company has been approving, how it's basically restructure itself,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 2>particularly spin off of its cloud services division. Please to

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 2>say MATCHI, MATCHI Today, Thursday is the day to where

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 2>plum is One Isabelle Lee, and please to say that

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>we've got the memo. Uh, talk to me a little

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 2>bit about what's happening in terms of these earnings, because

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 2>it looks as though we thought China's reopening was gonna

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 2>galvanize and revenue is up a bit, but not enough.

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so shares are tanking and investors are really unhappy

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 8>because they thought this is the quarter that, you know,

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 8>after China was closed for several years, it's a big reopening.

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 8>We're going to bank on this and we're going to

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 8>see growth. But it was a bit disappointing. So a

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 8>couple of takeaways. Quarterly sales miss estimates. That's due to

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 8>a shrinking commerce business. We also have cloud revenue declined

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 8>for the first time on record, and that's a big

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 8>deal because Ali Baba Cloud is the largest cloud provider

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 8>in China.

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a multi billion business.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 8>And of course the bread and butter, which is a

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 8>customer management fees that also shrank for the fourth straight quarter.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 8>So that's really of a China reopening have gone south

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 8>because we've found the Chinese consumers have preferred eating out,

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 8>going on trips, going to karaoka rooms, and seeing their

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 8>hearts out rather than shopping online, which they have been

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 8>doing for the past two years when they were stuck at.

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Home, like us, a little bit more into their experiences

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, what about the disrestructuring any people holding

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 2>their breath for really the details coming from Jane Ziyng

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 2>here and well, the focus is on the cloud right

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and the spin off their roll of and some of

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the other logistics businesses.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 8>So many people were really looking at these earnings halls

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 8>because that's what they wanted to do. In fact, some

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 8>were saying that this is what we care more about

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 8>rather than the earnings, because it's the future. It's a

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 8>historic change. It's been around seven weeks since this was

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 8>announced and a lot of people are speculating this is

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 8>of course with the approval of the Chinese government or

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 8>with their blessing and some takeaways. They did give some

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 8>details which made a lot of people happy. Look, for instance,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 8>Cloudnesses to your point, it's going to be an independent,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 8>publicly listed company likely in the next year. They also

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 8>have their logistics business infront Ipo twelve to eighteen months.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.239
<v Speaker 8>The grocery chain is also seeking to listen the next

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 8>six to twelve months, and the international commerce business will

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 8>seek external funding. So many changes there. I still love

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 8>the Bloomberg opinion callist Tim Culplan calling at six Baby

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 8>Baba's and now the Baba is really unique on its

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 8>own because it's one of the few, if not the

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 8>only one that people look at as a sum of

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 8>fits parts basis, So they look at the little parts

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 8>and that's how they value the company, especially with this

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 8>big historic breaking up happening, and.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>They're going to have sort of rotating caster characters and

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the earning statements going on. Right when they speak to analysts,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 2>it will be one of the other leaders and one

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 2>of the baby barber's coming on, So that's interesting.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 8>Are they going to have one or are they going

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 8>to be really treated as an independent company? And one

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 8>important point is yes, they will be split into six,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 8>but there will be some favorites. Obviously, some businesses will

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 8>be better and stronger than the others. So we're going

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 8>to see the winners and the losers down the line.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you on, thank you breaking it all

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 2>down as Vallee. Meanwhile, let's just stick with the e

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 2>commerce a little bit more consumer jant Walmart. Look, it's

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>reporting earnings today, really lifting its annual profit forecast after

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 2>its discount model Walmart Plus it's powering new market share

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 2>gains in the United States, so we see a pop

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and the shares just coming back from their highs. At

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the moment, we're coming up all things. You guessed it

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence, founder of landing ai, Deep Learning dot Ai,

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 2>co founder of CASERA. That's gonna be next. Where are

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 2>we in terms of the education front? And let's all

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>just keep an eye also on the shares of Panel

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>because they trade. The Tesla supplier plans to roughly quadruple

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 2>annual battery production capacity to two hundred gigor what hours

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>by March twenty thirty one, a sign that it anticipates

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>greater demand for electric vehicles. It has a performed over

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of days. This Bloomberg. This is a

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 2>good one. A new exchange traded fund and ETF tracking

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 2>companies that benefit from the rise of artificial intelligence is

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 2>hitting the market looking to tap into what is a

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 2>growing frenzy for the technology. The Roundhall Generative AI and

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Technology ETF. We're in trading under the aptly named ticker

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 2>chat on Thursday. The actively managed fund will invest mostly

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 2>in companies that derive portions of their revenue or profit

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 2>from generative AI. There are stick on that theme, perfect

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Voice for now. Andrew is joining US general partner at

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 2>AI Fund, also chairman, founder and CEO of Landing Ai.

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 2>Also founded Deep learning dot AI is also the co

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 2>founder of cor Sarah and also, of course a junk

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>professor at Stanford University's Computer Science department. Whoh titles and

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 2>a half. And it's let's start on the AI fund

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 2>in particular, doctor, because it's a venture studio, which particular applications,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Which businesses? What industries do you want to disrupt? What

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 2>you grow there?

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>AI is like electricity one hundred years ago. I think

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it there's a position to transform all industries. My friends

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>used to challenge each other and name an industry that

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>AI will not transform, and where actually struggle with that.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I went sit on stage and said, maybe hairdressing. Can

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the AI cut someone's hair? But my friend, who was

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a robotic professor suit of data and pointed in my

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>head and she said, Andrew, most AI can't. Most people's

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hair can't get AI to cut their hairstyle. But you're here, Andrew,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a robot could totally do that. So I think we're

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>actually going to all sorts of industries today.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Brutal, your hair looks very nice today. Look, what's so

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 2>interesting about your background is not only the wider range

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 2>of companies that you found in, but look, you were

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 2>a Google Brain team for example, really at the very

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 2>beginnings of AI within that particular source of buy do

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested as to.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>How I started to let the Google Bran team was

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>a great fun and my team built a lot of

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Google's you know, modernly I capabilities. Yeah.

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 2>So with that, how do you worry about big companies,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 2>big corporates having so much talent having basically ability to

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe even negotiate agencies that require licenses. Going forward,

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>do you think that we will see a democratization in

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 2>how AI has grown or do you think it will

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 2>be owned by some big, big companies that already exist.

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>There are opportunities for both large companies and for new startups.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>This is where I see the value being generated. There's

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the hardware layer companies and video, Intel, A m D.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe new entrants as well though that that

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>would create a lot of value. There's the infrastructure layer,

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>including the clouds as was the AI tool builders. That

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>looks quite competitive, but also opportunities there. And then the

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>massive untaped opportunity that most people don't realize is the

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>application layer. So I think that AI is a general

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>purpose technology. That means it's not just useful for one thing,

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, a built AI AD systems that moves massive

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>amounts of dollars. It's some of the large add tech

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>advertising platforms. But yeah, isn't just useful ads. It's useful

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for robotic process automation, medical diagnosis, and agriculture and manufacturing.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's actually very difficult for any one

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.479
<v Speaker 1>company to simultaneously build businesses and everything maritime shipping to education,

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to healthcare to financial services, and so I think the

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>most efficient way to actually realize all of these diverse

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>use cased art cross economy is to build multiple startups

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to attack these different opportunities. And actually that's what my

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>adventure firm AI Fund does. And I think the application

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>layer has love untapped opportunities, not just.

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>So no one company can own all those fields. But

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>what about one country? Everyone needs to have deep anxiety

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 2>about the so called race US versus China. As someone

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 2>who is a by do, how do you how does

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>your expertise instruct that view?

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'out speaking to any one country. I feel

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>like most countries at this point in time are prioritly

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>under investing in AI. Ten years ago, we saw the

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>explosion in deep learning machine learning basically labeling things. You know,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>label what's the text transfer for this label? When someone

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>click on this, that label this medical linosis. Ten years later,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 1>we're not yet sold. We're not yet finished sorting out

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>all the valuable use cases where this is going to

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.719
<v Speaker 1>be applied. And in the last few years we now

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have generative AI, which is another general purpose technology, which

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>again is useful all sorts of things. And that means

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that the number of applications to which we can apply

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>AI is even BARSI greater than before. This means that

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>for most nations, the next decade will have a lot

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of opportunities to figure out a lot more country use cases,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to create a lot of value for everyone. And I

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think thank in most countries invest more in the tech

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and in research and in education around AI.

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>You wrote quite a strongly worded response rebuttal, shall we

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 2>say to what had been the proposal? The letter the

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>signatory is saying, look, put a wholt, put a pause,

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>particularly on generative AI development at the moment in the

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 2>big large language models. You said, in particular it advise

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 2>largely because you know the genie's out the bottle, but

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>ultimately that you know they were unrealistic in the way

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 2>in which AI could upend humanity. But also we don't

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>want to slow down innovation. Where are you on just

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>how powerful AI could become, or at least where the

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 2>regulatory landscape is moving at the pace at which the

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>innovation is two So.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think AI does have risk. There is bias, fairness,

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>concentration of power, amplifying toxic speech, generating toxic speech, job displacement.

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>There are real risks that the AI community takes seriously

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>working on hopefully actually for the most part, working really

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to make things better. Then there is the overhyped

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>existential risk or AI wipe out humanity. I am less

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>worried about that for a couple of reasons. One the

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>heart takeoff scenario where AI isn't working that well yet today,

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>but suddenly overnight May thirty first, twenty twenty three, we

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>suddenly have sent in superintelligence and then forty hours later

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 1>is taken over the world. Technology doesn't work like that,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It actually grows gradually associated coming, and humanity has lots

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of experience controlling entities any more more powerful than a

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>single human. Corporations in nations states are much more powerful

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>than one person. But we feel for the most part,

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.959
<v Speaker 1>managed to steal them for the common good. And then lastly,

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I think humanity does have existential risk. Maybe an asteroid

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>will do to us, whether it did to the dinosaurs,

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or climate change leading to massive depopulation, and I think

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or the next pandemic, you know, fingers crossed. When the

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>look the actual existential risks that face humanity, I think

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>AI will get large part of the solutions. So if

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you want a humanity to survive and thrive for the

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>next thousand years, I would rush much rather make AI

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>go faster to help us solve these problems, rather than

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>slow AI down.

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about thriving. It's really interesting that one

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 2>particular sort of public market capitalization that's been up and

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>it is the education companies that we see listed. I

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 2>think of CHEG and how much they started to reference

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that chat GIPT might be slowing their own growth. You

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 2>are a man who knows and understands online education thoroughly.

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 2>You're already developing a way in which you can perhaps

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 2>retrain reskill to make engineers prompt engineering developers. How are

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 2>you seeing the landscape change for tech talent right now?

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that in the tech talent landscape. I want

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to share one thing that is really obvious that AI

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>insiders but it's not widely known, which is the rise

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of AI things like chat GPT. Not there's a consumer too,

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but there's a developer two. So many people have tried

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT having yet go try it or Bard or

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft Edge of being searched. Fantastic consumer too. What

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>many people do not yet understand is that these tools

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are very powerful developer twos as well. And so there

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>were AI systems that used to take teams like a

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>year to build. They can now be built in a

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>day or two. And so a few weeks ago, a

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, Collaborative Open AI my team deep

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>lamed the AI launched a free online costs juptpro program

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for developers to teach people how they use this to

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>program a capabilities really fast, really quickly. And we actually

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>had half a millionaire romans in about two weeks. Maybe

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>don know. It was the fastest growing cause the history

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of honor education. But I think that this massive wave

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of new applications that can now build much more cheaply

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and much more quickly is we're just at the start

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. And I think most people have not realized

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>how big a flood of innovation does it cause an.

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 2>AI fascinating Thank you for coming on. Hope to have

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you on again soon, Doctor Andrew of course, founder and

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Lanning Ai. Of course, the AI Fund is

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 2>where he's currently helping grow startups. Time now for what's

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 2>going viral. Apple's long awaited mixed reality headset. That's what is.

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>It's finally becoming a reality. Bloomberg's Mark Gumm and you've

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 2>got a great piece out today and June fifth, we

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 2>hold our breath.

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, don't hold your breath much longer. On June fifth,

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 9>Apple will be introducing its next big thing. We actually

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 9>first wrote about the headset in twenty seventeen, that this

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 9>is something Apple was working on. We've been reporting on

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 9>it for a number of years now. All sorts of

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 9>details you can find on Bloomberg dot com and power

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 9>on our later story today in BusinessWeek. Details to products development,

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 9>how the initial Dream was standalone augmented reality glasses, lots

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 9>of technical challenges and compromises needed to be made, and

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 9>now we're going to be getting something that's sort of

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 9>in between a classic VR headset and the Dream of

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 9>AAR glasses. This is a mixed reality headset. It's going

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 9>to be quite light and slim with an external battery,

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 9>very powerful with an M two macgrade processor. The idea

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 9>being this device would replace many of the tasks done

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 9>today on an iPhone, macro iPad. Focus on gaming, virtual reality,

0:34:56.280 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 9>video conferencing, collaboration remotely through different applications, productivity. Gaming will

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 9>be a big focus, meditating, working out at some point

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 9>as well. So this is going to be a pretty

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 9>jam packed and expensive product.

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it better be. For three thousand dollars, Mark Gumman,

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 2>absolutely brilliant, Go readers pieces. We thank you so much

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 2>for giving us that setup. And let's dig into well.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Someone who's helping build these new augmented and virtual realities,

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 2>whether it be meditation, whether it be online learning. Emma

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 2>rig just stadders with us, co founder and CEO of

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.280
<v Speaker 2>warp In. It's a Swedish vir training company that's helped businesses.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it's initial creator with Magic Leak, with Meta,

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 2>even Disney and Ferrari they trained staff and market products.

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Emma just the possibilities here. It is a big price

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 2>tag for Apple's product. We know that Meta perhaps has

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>struggled a little bit with the sales of its oculus,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, what are you seeing about the the

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 2>overall desire of people to want to interact in this way.

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's start off by saying that we are the

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the next technological revolution, right, So for the

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 3>first time, we're seeing a lot of new technologies developing

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 3>at the same time. We have augmented reality, virtual reality,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence, everything coming at the same time, creating new

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 3>opportunities that we haven't seen before. I mean, Apple, they

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 3>stand for quality and they have been working on this

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 3>headset for many years obviously, so everyone is of course

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 3>very excited, exciting of what they're going to release. But

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 3>what we are seeing from our point of view is

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 3>the benefits that we're seeing with these technologies are a

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 3>greater shift, I think than with the smart form phone

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 3>or the internet.

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 2>What needs to happen. Does a price point need to

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 2>be more accessible for this really to go mainstream?

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you know right now we are in

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 3>the business to business where we're seeing the real results.

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 3>If you're using virtual reality for training and education, for example,

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 3>you can lower your tough with eighty percent, have a

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 3>retention of seventy percent, and you learn four times faster

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 3>than any other training method out there. So I mean

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 3>for this to become more mainstream, we need a headset

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 3>that is more fashionable, that is a little bit cheaper,

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 3>and of course content is king. It has to add

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 3>value to us. It has to make sense for us

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 3>to put on a headset instead of using our phone.

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's the point emmer is many many

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 2>would feel that actually, until you've tried it, you can't

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 2>knock it. But the trying of it is going to

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 2>be the hard thing. How do you get out there

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and market these products? How do you ensure that everyone

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 2>can see the benefits?

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that to your point, the content is

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 3>king here. We need to have experiences that rarely showcases

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 3>what these technologies can do, because instead of being on

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 3>the internet or just looking at the internet, we're going

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 3>to be inside the internet, using all of our senses

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 3>and engaging in a whole new way. And I think

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 3>when we can see content and apps that will really

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 3>show how these technologies will change our life, then I

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 3>think it will become much more mainstream. And I think

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 3>gaming and social media and those areas are really exciting

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 3>and fun, but the greatest benefits for humanity will be

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 3>in training, education, And just like the first Internet revolutionize

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 3>these areas, so will Web three point zero and a mataverse.

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Of course, there's lots of hand ringing about that. There's

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 2>worries in the same way you mentioned alificient intelligence. We're

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.720
<v Speaker 2>worrying about the regulation of that, the safe and ethical

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 2>use of it. We're worried about people will live in

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 2>too much of their lives in a virtual or augmented reality.

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 2>How are you thinking about that? Because I know over

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 2>in Sweden there as much thought to this.

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that we have almost lost the whole generation

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 3>for a two D world, right, we miss when we

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 3>had the smartphones to actually educate people on how to

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 3>communicate with each other. I see this actually as a

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 3>window opportunity unity where we're leaving this is very limited

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to the world behind us and entering a more natural

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 3>state of the treaty world. And I think when we're

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 3>entering these worlds, we also we're going to see how

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 3>we spend our time and how we can use this

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 3>to feel better and to connect with each other. You

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 3>are three point seventy five times more emotional connected to

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the content that you can experience. So I think that

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 3>we can use these technologies to kind of bridge those.

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Gaps that we have built. And when we first introduced you,

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 2>we heard of all the companies you've been working with

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 2>in the economic environment, realities of it. Our companies as

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 2>willing to venture into this field. Yes, and I think.

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:45.919
<v Speaker 3>That what we need to solve are problems that we're

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.959
<v Speaker 3>facing at the moment. So I mean, by the year

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five, fifty percent of everyone on the planet

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 3>we'll be needing reskilling or upskillings. So and the method

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 3>is that we're using are costly and very and consuming.

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 3>So companies are looking at new ways to solve problems

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 3>that we're facing. And I think that if you're a

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 3>company today within the production line, retail or those types

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 3>of areas, you need to have a look at a

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 3>metaverse strategy.

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm a great to spend some time with you. Thanks

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 2>for saying late. I'm Stockholm for us. Emma Ritaistance, co

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 2>founder and CEO of Warping. Meanwhile, that does it for

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You do not want to

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 2>forget about our podcast catch up if you can't catch

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 2>us Live provide on the terminal, as well as online

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart This is Bloomberg.