WEBVTT - Uber Plans Robotaxi Partnership with Lucid and Nuro

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>lie from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde and New

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>York and Vla Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. TSMC, the world's biggest

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>contract chip maker, gets a big boost from AI demand.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Plus Uber teams up with EV maker Lucid and self

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 2>driving tech start up Neuro to launch a robotaxi fleet.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll speak with the CEO of Neuro and what to

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>expect from Netflix earning today. Will it be a blockbuster

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>or a bus Let's get to that curious three way

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 2>deal that is between Uber, Lucid and Neuro. Basically how

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>it works is Lucid's going to provide the cars, Neuro

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the self driving tech, and Uber's gonna pay for everything.

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna get a lot more detail on that later

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>in the show. But look at shares of Lucid up

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty six percent. This is a big move upwards and

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>we need to find out why. The big story in

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>global technology is TISMC, the world's largest and most important

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>contracts manufacturer. These are the US listed shares. ADR is

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>up two point eight percent, basically upgraded the growth forecast

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>on the top line to thirty percent, saying that there

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 2>is hot AI demand right now, but interestingly some headwinds

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>from currency which we can dig into. Luckily, bloombergsy and

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>King is here for more who leads our coverage of

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the semiconductor industry. So actually quite a simple story that

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>in the numbers in the period gone and what they

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>said about what's to come. AI demand is everything now.

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean only time you're saying thirty percent of year

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>saying we're having a good year. But it's important to

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>point out that the start didn't do much locally and

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>why was that well because guess what some analysts were

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 3>expecting even more so fantastic obviously a great derivative for here,

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 3>but maybe not as fantastic as some had expected.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Tiersmc's business is really interesting because basically two thirds of

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>it is high performance compute, the chips that go into

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>data centers. Historically it was smartphones. So even though the

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>proportions have changed, I see both of those divisions growing.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, both of them did well. As you said, high

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 3>performance computing, which is basically in videos, chips, amb's chips,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>anything that any of the hyperscalers design themselves. That's sixty

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 3>percent of its business that's growing well. And that's really

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>what the focus is right now. That's what everybody wants

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>to see, is this story that is defining technology still

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 3>continuing And the answer was absolutely yes.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 2>So TISMT is like the crown jaw of Taiwan. It's

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>their most important entity and company. They have a big

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>footprint there. But what was really interesting to hear about

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 2>was the headwind from currency. As I understand it, they

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>book all their revenue and US dollars, but their operating

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>costs are in Taiwanese dollars. What did they say about

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 2>that and how it's going to impact them?

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this is obviously a complex story because

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 3>they're in a distributed supply chain. Though you've got the

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>currency headwims, You've got concern about what's going to happen

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 3>to that supply chain. Are they moving, are they raising

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 3>their expenses as they build factories here in the US,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen with tariff? So all of these

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of economic uncertainties and currency was one of them

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>factored into I think this kind of conservative or what

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>was considered conservative forecast with conservative in their context, which

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 3>is pretty amazing still.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Blimbozi and King, who again leads our coverage of

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the semiconductor industry. Let's get more of a broader market's

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>perspective and go out to j Jacobs Blackrock, US head

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of equity. Ets you and I've talked about infrastructure so much,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>but I almost consider names like TSMC and ASML as

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>being kind of soft data sets rather than kind of

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 2>hard data sets. ASML gave us one signal and then

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>TSMC gave us another. As somebody that looks at their

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>exposure to this AI supply chain, what did you make

0:03:59.240 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>of it?

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you really have to go up to

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of the higher order of capital expenditures, which is

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 4>impacting so many different semiconductor stocks. If you look at

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 4>the top four builders of infrastructure this year and combine

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 4>them with energy and utilities companies, all of that capex

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 4>equals the rest of the S and P five hundred combined.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 4>So you're just seeing so much investment from semi conductors

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 4>to energy and power sources across this AI megaporce that

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 4>it's really providing a ton of ballast to these stocks

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 4>as we enter into earning season.

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 2>I think we'd agree that AI is having a profound

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>impact on markets. That's probably an understatement at this point.

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 2>But when you consider the ETFs you're managing, where do

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 2>you see the enthusiasm or where do you see movement

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>of investors wanting to be exposed to what's happening.

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, if we look more broadly at what's

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 4>happening in the markets, this here, themes are really displacing

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 4>sectors as having the most explanatory power of what's happening

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.119
<v Speaker 4>around us. You know, artificial intelligence and baskets of stocks

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 4>related to that explained a lot of what happened in February.

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 4>If you look at geopolitical fragmentation and companies in the

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure and defense space, that explains a lot of what's

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 4>been happening since April. So themes themselves have a ton

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 4>of explanatory power in the markets. To your question, you know,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 4>where are we seeing some of the most excitement and

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence? We continue to be looking at the build

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 4>out of digital infrastructure. You know, we know that we

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 4>are still in the build phase of AI. This is

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 4>where you're seeing hundreds of billions of dollars of capital

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 4>expenditure to build the best models, to make them smarter,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 4>to make them more scalable. That's where we are today,

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 4>and that's where a lot of our active portfolio managers

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 4>like Tony Kim, who manages BAI for US, has positioned

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of his portfolio.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.799
<v Speaker 2>BAI is super interesting. We just showed it on the screen.

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 2>But the Tica BAI, there's this two point two billion

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 2>dollars of interest, you can quantify it. What are the

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 2>main facts behind that meeting?

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Jay Well, I think a lot of investors are looking

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 4>at artificial intelligence but realize they don't really have great

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 4>exposure to it. In fact, you know, we looked at

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 4>over ten thousand portfolios by financial advisors in the United

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 4>States and about ninety five percent of whatever AI exposure

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 4>they have in their portfolio is coming just from the

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 4>MAG seven. So maybe it's because they own index funds

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 4>that are just broad market in nature and getting that

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 4>MAG seven exposure. Maybe they're looking at tech sector and

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 4>getting MAG seven through that, but so little of their

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 4>exposure is to the broader AI value chain across digital infrastructure, power, infrastructure, applications,

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 4>data owners that we see a lot of investors are

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 4>more intentionally allocating to AI, selling down tech sector exposure

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 4>to allocate to a fund like BAI, or even selling

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 4>down core exposure in large in US large caps to

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 4>get exposure to a fund like BAI.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I find this sub theme of onshoring into America and

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>basically reindustrialization really interesting. Is there a sort of specific

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 2>basket of names which you would not necessarily feel are

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 2>the technology sector. I'm thinking a little bit like real

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 2>estate and all of those names that are involved in

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the construction of a data set into.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a few areas to look at. I mean, one,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 4>we just broadly really like US infrastructure names. You know,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 4>we've seen some good flows into IFRA, which is a

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 4>US infrastructurey TF because if you want to build semiconductors

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 4>in the United States, or you want to build you know,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of high end technologies like electric vehicles, you need roads,

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 4>you need highways, you need airports, you need ports, you

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 4>need electricity on the grid, you need waterways. It really

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 4>takes a wide range of infrastructure to set up these

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 4>very expensive and complicated manufacturing supply chains within the United States.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 4>So we see that physical infrastructure and digital infrastructure being

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 4>a really common denominator here. But if you really want

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 4>to kind of double click into one area. If you

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 4>look at semiconductor equipment manufacturers, you know, this is kind

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 4>of a highest upstream way to play. More semiconductors being

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 4>built in the United States, the semi's equipment manufacturers should

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>do quite well. And that's an area we have exposure

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 4>to in our manufacturing ETF made.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring it back to the use of the day,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>which is TSMC, and one of the themes that came

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>up was currency headwinds. And it was interesting because, in

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>simple terms, TSMC is a Taiwanese company that books revenue

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>in US dollars, but it operates in Taiwanese dollars. I

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 2>give that to you Jay, to kind of illustrate that

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 2>this is a name that if you're an American investor,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>even though it's Taiwanese, you can still get exposure to.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>But it's a company that's increasingly looking to the US

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 2>for its own investments and to build out more of

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>its own capacity here onshore or domestically. Yeah, that's right.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean what we've seen is, you know a lot

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 4>of latility in the dollar, and the weakening of the

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 4>dollar generally has you know, boosted international stocks. You know,

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 4>in fact, just if you look at a lot of

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 4>what our investors are doing today, it's allocating to international

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 4>ETFs to benefit from the changing position of the dollar.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 4>So I think we're going to see this more and

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>more of this earning season. Currency is going to be

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 4>an important factor as companies trying to explain how their

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 4>earnings have done. And there's you know, there's just a

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>new element to back out of with dollar weekening.

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Jay, we're a few weeks now into the second half

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 2>of the year. What do you expecting and watching foremost

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>closely in the balance of twenty twenty five.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 4>Well, we just published our thematic media or update on

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 4>ishers dot com and we're really looking at kind of

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the evolution of two areas, artificial intelligence and geopolitical fragmentation.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, in AI, what we're looking for is continued

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 4>breakthroughs in the intelligence of AI. You know, right now

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 4>we would say AI models are kind of college level

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 4>of intelligence. I think we're on the precipice of master's

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 4>degree level of intelligence of AI, and that should really

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 4>boost even more adoption on the geopolitical fragmentation front. You know,

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 4>we talked about infrastructure a bit, defense spending is still

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 4>very much in focus. But also even if you just

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 4>look at things like people buying gold, a lot of

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 4>diversification into monetary alternatives. It should be a pretty big

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 4>trend we see through the end of the year as well.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>J Jacobs a black Rold. Great to have you back

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>on the show. Really appreciate it. Now, coming up, Congress

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 2>edges closer to the landmark crypto legislation. We're going to

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>speak with Kristen Smiths, Solana Policy Institute President about everything

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 2>that's going on in crypto week sous to take a

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>quick look at. Shares of Lucid now up forty percent,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>almost forty one percent, a deal with Uber and euro

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 2>over the next six years for a fleet of robotaxis

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>on the platform. Also a one to ten reverse stock split.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>A reverse stock split non diluted reduces the number shares

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 2>outstanding proportionately raises the price lots to ask about that,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>and actually later in the day on Bloomberg TV, I

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>heard that the Lucid CEO is going to swing by

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>stay with us. This is Bloomberg Tech Washington's weighing landmark

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>crypto legislation during what's been dubbed crypto week, digital assets

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 2>have been surging thanks in part to those regulatory prospects,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>with ether ETF seeing a record breaking seven hundred and

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty six million in daily I want to get out

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to Kristen Smith, Solana Policy Institute President, and this is

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the bit that I'm trying to understand. It is Crypto Week,

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 2>and there seems to be a lot of excitement, and

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 2>that excitement alone is driving inflows into various places and

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>trading activity across the world of crypto. Is that a

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 2>good ration now, Kristen.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, Happy Crypto Week. It's great to

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 5>see you.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a lot of excitement within the crypto industry,

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>within the policy making industry, but within the broader financial

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 5>services industry around what's happening in Washington here today. Later

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 5>this afternoon, the House of Representatives is going to vote

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 5>on three bills, the Genius Act, which regular stable coins,

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 5>the Clarity Act, which is the House's version of market

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 5>structure legislation, and the third bill on Central bank digital currencies.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 5>So this is a really historic week, and one of

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 5>those bills, the Genius Act, is going to go on

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 5>this way to the White House for the President's signature.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 5>This is going to be the first time the US

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 5>government has put a new federal regulatory framework in place,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 5>and so I think this is showing the entire market

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 5>that this is a technology that's here to stay and

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 5>it's got the full backing of the US government.

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Something very interesting happened this week. It was crypto weeek,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 2>but it was also Earning's week for the banks, And

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking down at the list. You had the CEOs

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>of JP Morgan, Bank of America, and City Group all

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>basically a acknowledge the digital dollar, but then note that

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 2>it's a threat to how banking is currently done in

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 2>the context of this legislation that's going through. What do

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>you make of that those heavyweights of waters finance saying

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 2>we got to think about this.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I've also seen a lot of those heavyweights

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 5>talk about getting into this stable coin industry themselves, and

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 5>so I think what we have here is there's going

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 5>to be an upgrade of our technology. Crypto rails, open

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 5>public blockchains like Solana, for example, are very good for

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 5>recording transactions and moving payments around the world in a

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 5>timely manner, and so I think what we're going to

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 5>see in the years A head is a real upgrade

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 5>to our system, one that will lower costs but will

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 5>also bring new opportunities. I think what's really great about

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 5>this legislation is that it will spur innovation across many

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 5>different sectors, and that innovation is really where the US

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 5>economy sees its growth come from. And so this is

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 5>a real opportunity I think for crypto, for traditional finance,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 5>and for the businesses and consumers here in the United States.

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Christin, you've been involved in different roles in advocating the

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 2>industry's position to government and to regulators. What does this

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>moment represent if those different pieces of legislation get done

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and dusted, how significant is that for what you've been

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to work on in recent years. Yeah.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, I've been in the crypto advocacy space for almost

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 5>seven years now, and so for me, this this week

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 5>is the highlight of my career. I have a red

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 5>dress I bought to hopefully word of the White House

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 5>film signing ceremony, and I think it's a really big moment.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 5>But really this is I think the true opportunity for

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 5>the American people. I think for a long time, our

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 5>financial services system has been you know, sort of stuck

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 5>on old technology and this is the first step forward.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 5>And so I'm, you know, very excited that we've had

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 5>such strong leadership with Senator Haggerty, Senator jillibrand also Congressman

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Thompson and Chairman Hill in the House, and then President

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 5>Trump and David Saxson Bohines for really really digging in

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 5>and making this a priority. I think it's something that

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 5>we're going to see payoff for all of the American

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 5>people in due time.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>There was discussion that I had with David Sachs in

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of weeks or a few weeks about

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the bipartisan nature or not of the legislation. So if

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>we take the Genius Act and stable Coin, for example,

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>there were things that the Democrats wanted in there that

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>ended up not being From the salon a Policy institute's perspective,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 2>did you get what you felt was needed in the

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>content of that bill. Yes.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 5>At Lana Policy Institute, we're very happy with the way

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 5>that the Genius Bill ended up, And people who know me,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm very skeptical of early drafts. But that's why we

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 5>have advocates in Washington who can go with work with

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 5>Congress fine tune the legislation and make sure that it

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 5>has the customer protections that the policy makers want, but

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 5>also is done in a way that allows those who

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 5>are building around the technology to have the certainty that

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 5>they need in order to build and innovate. And so

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 5>I think they've nailed it here with the Genius Act.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 5>I think it's it's really good language, and I think

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 5>it's one of the reasons why the House is going

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 5>to you know, sort of pass it without changes and

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 5>send it on to the President's desk. You know, there

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 5>is another issue, the market structure issue, that that debate

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 5>is continuing to happen, and so you know, if there's

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 5>any cleanup that needs to happen, you know, I think

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 5>we'll get another bite at the apple.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Kristen Smith, Slana Policy Institute President. Great to have you

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>back on the show. Thank you very much. Now, coming up,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Uber teams up with ev maker Lucid and self driving

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 2>tech startup Neuro to launch a robotaxi fleet. We're going

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to speak to the CEO of Neuro. That's coming up next.

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. Okay, let's take a look at

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>shares of the ev maker Lucid. Take a look at this.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 2>The stock in the session is currently up significantly forty

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 2>six percent. It went wild in the pre market for

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 2>various reasons. The first one that hit the wire a

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>reverse one to ten stock split. Basically, it is non

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>dilute tree. It reduces a number of shares outstanding. It

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 2>proportionately raises the share price for holders of note. Later

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in the day. We can get into mechanics of that,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 2>because what's really boosting it is the three way robotaxi

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 2>deal that this company's done. Lucid with Uber is launching

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a partnership along with self driving text dot up Neuro.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a new robotaxi which will be available on Uber's

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>ride hailing service. The details are important, fortunately, Dave Ferguson,

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the co founder and president of Neuro's with us, give

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 2>me a second. With this, Lucid provides the gravity SUVs.

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 2>You guys provide a part of the technology stack. Uber

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 2>basically pays for everything. They've invested three hundred million dollars

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>into Lucid, several hundred million dollars into you. What happens next?

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so, Ed, First, thanks for having me. Great to

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 6>see you, Great to be here, I think you've got it.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 6>So Lucid is integrating Neuro's driver hardware components, so the

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 6>sense and compute into their vehicles on the production line.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 6>Those vehicles are then ship to Uber. Uber owns and

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 6>operates them, and neuro drivers software provides the driving capability

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 6>for those vehicles on the Uber network.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 2>What does Uber get out of its investment in you?

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>In fact, let's just be honest about it. Lucids is

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 2>clear three hundred million. How much is Uber putting into you?

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 2>And what are they getting in return in terms of

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 2>IP or guaranteed access to something.

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 6>I think Uber is investing in Neuro in a standard

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 6>equity stake, and so I think that they're very, very

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 6>excited about this partnership and this program, and they want

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 6>to make sure that all of the parties are very

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 6>invested in the success of that program. And so they

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 6>want to make sure that they also have some ownership

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 6>and frankly some upside in Neuro. Given how deeply we're

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 6>going to be partnering to build this and the scale

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 6>that we're going to be embarking on together, how.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Much are they investing? Well, we carefully worded it as

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 2>why not just give us a number.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, I think some of that is within our

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 6>control and some of that is outside of our control.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 2>We were not mind so much giving you the number.

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 6>I think there there's more sensitivity in other courts.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll phone and ask. You have a very close

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>relationship with Nvidia, you know, essentially building on top of

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>what Nvidia offers and and just explain it because it

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 2>seems like a bit of our unlocked for you guys.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 2>And this deal kind of involves in video to a

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 2>certain extent as well.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, So part of what we believe differentiates Neuro is

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 6>that we have a dramatically lower cost hardware set of

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 6>sensors and compute that powers all of the vehicles that

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 6>we create as self driving vehicles. And so Nvidia plays

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 6>a very large part of that because they provide for

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 6>us the SOOC that powers all of the compute. So

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 6>all of the compute on this robotaxi platform is going

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 6>to be based on video chips SC That's right, and

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 6>for us, for Neuro, that has dramatically simplified our overall

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 6>compute because before we had that system, we had to

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 6>have FPGAs that dealt with the sensor data. We had

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 6>to have CPUs, we had to have GPUs, we had

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 6>to have safety computers. We've been able to effectively collapse

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 6>all of that into the thor SoC So it's a

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 6>simplification and the complexity as well as a significant reduction

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 6>in costs.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 2>You've been, I understand a testing a Lucid vehicle but

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 2>on a closed circuit to make sure the tech stack works.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>What's the evolution of that? Like the plan as I

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>understand it is, Gravity goes into production late twenty twenty

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 2>six and twenty thousand thousand of them are due to

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Uber over six period year period. How do you get

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>to public roads?

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so we as a company, Neuro has been doing

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 6>fully driverless operation on public roads for over five years now,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 6>so we have a lot of experience with what it

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 6>takes to validate our tech and to get it out

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 6>onto those roads safely. With the Lucid platform, it's obviously

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 6>a new vehicle platform for us to work with. We

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 6>got the first one going our first prototype in something

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 6>like seven weeks, which is unheard of for us and

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 6>we think the industry, so we'd be moving very very quickly.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>So Lucid's providing the sensor suite.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 6>The sensor suite is neuro driver hardware, so it's a

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 6>sensor suite that neuro has designed, although all of it

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 6>is automotive grade, set the shelf off the shelf sensing,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 6>So Neuro has basically provided a design template for that,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 6>and Loocid is going to integrate that for the prototype

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 6>vehicles where we're doing small scale integration. For the twenty

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 6>thousands fleet, it's going to be integrated directly into the

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 6>production line.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 2>You were focused on delivery, not moving humans. Have you

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 2>just done with that now?

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 6>So about two years ago we shifted our go to market.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 6>We used to be building a fully vertically integrated delivery

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 6>as a service business with our own custom vehicles. Two

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 6>things changed about two years ago. The first is that

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 6>the cost of capital dramatically increased, and while we still

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 6>today like that business model, it requires a huge amount

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 6>of capital, so it no longer made sense for us

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 6>to take on all of that. The second thing that

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 6>changed was the tech that we had built was so

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 6>heavily based on AI that we had learned how to

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 6>drive like an experts human driver, so we could expand

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 6>it beyond goods to also passenger transportation. So we made

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 6>the call about two years ago to stop doing goods

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 6>and to license the tick across a range of applications.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Dave's just very quick ten seconds. Do you really believe

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>that Lucid can manufacture all these to the deadline you've outlined?

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 8>Oh?

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely yes. All right, day focused a neuroc founder and president.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much for being here with us in

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. In about an hour a conversation with Lucid's

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 2>interim CEO, Mark Winterhoff. That's a twelve thirty pm New

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 2>York time, nine thirty am here in the Bay Area. Okay,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>coming up, Details of an agreement between Facebook and US

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 2>privacy regulators emerge in the Delaware court yesterday. We're gonna

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 2>have an update on a recently announced settlement between Meta

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 2>shareholders and the company's board of directors. That's next. This

0:22:48.280 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. In the

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 2>context of earnings, I think Netflix is kind of what

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 2>we're all waiting for after the bell. We're not going

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 2>to get a subscriber or subscribe a growth number anymore.

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So what are you going to look at? Most are

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 2>saying the content slate. What is Netflix going to bring

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 2>to us in the second half of this year. Shout

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 2>out to those of you that are going through squid game.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 2>At the moment, the stocks are eight tens to one percent,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 2>but we're basically treading water. And then there's the outlook.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Netflix has said for a really long time, will Street

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>treat us as you would any other company on our

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 2>top and bottom line? And so we'll look at margins,

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 2>we'll look at operating income. But what might they do

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 2>in pricing, raising prices in various markets to give them

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a boost. Really looking forward to that one.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I will swear away from the domain of markets. We're

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>focused on some litigation investors in Meta say they've reached

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a settlement with current and former directors at the company

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>to end a multi billion dollar case that just started

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 2>yesterday in Delaware. I want to bring in Bloomberg's Riley Griffin,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>who you'll remember twenty four hours ago, was here with

0:23:59.920 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 2>us on the show. What's happened in the interim and

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 2>what is this agreement that we've learned about.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 9>It's amazing.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 10>So yesterday you and I were discussing how it's very

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 10>rare for these kinds of cases that seek to hold

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 10>board directors, CEOs, executives personally financially accountable for the crises

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 10>at their company. Now we have reached a settlement just

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 10>one day into the eight day case.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 9>We do not yet know the.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 10>Financial terms of this deal, but this means that out

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 10>of court we now know that Mark Zuckerberg and other

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 10>board directors aren't going to be testifying later this week,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 10>There isn't going to be more evidence presented, and some

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 10>some is being paid out to shareholders for this case,

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 10>which was about the data breach Cambridge Analytica that has

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 10>had that long shadow over years and years for Meta.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 2>So as we made absolutely clear just now but also yesterday,

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 2>this wasn't a case between the company and the shareholders.

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>It was specific e negatives and the board of directors.

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that's it? Now? That it's done, As.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 8>Far as I understand it, it is done.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 10>We are not going to see Mark Zuckerberg testify. We

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 10>are not going to see Peter Tiel testify. I think

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 10>that is a notable part of this story. We were

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 10>going to hear from the board members themselves. Just yesterday,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 10>actually we heard from Jeff Science. This was a former

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 10>Facebook board member who also went on to be President

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 10>Joe Biden's chief of staff, and what came out of

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 10>that testimony was interesting. We heard from Science that ultimately

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 10>the board had considered negotiating with the FTC, proposing through

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 10>its lawyers that it would reach a multi billion dollar

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 10>settlement over at Cambridge Analytica, but only if Mark Zuckerberg

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 10>wasn't held personally responsible. So that is one glimpse into

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 10>the kind of evidence that can come out in a

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 10>trial like this, and one day in they've shut it down.

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 10>We are not going to hear from other board members

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 10>or the CEO.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Bludo's Riley Griffin on the metabat. Great reporting, Thank you

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 2>very much. Let's get to some deals news. Princeton Digital

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Group is getting one point three billion dollars from alternative

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 2>investment firms Stone Peak, the funds that we used to

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 2>accelerate PDG's data center operations, which are across Asia. The

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 2>business already has over one point one gigawatts across six

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 2>countries in the region. Delighted to say we're joined by

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 2>PDG's chairman, CEO and co founder Rangu Salgam, who's joining

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>us late at night out in Singapore, and welcome to

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the program. Let's just start with the basic mechanics. There

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 2>is an interesting equity investment going on here. Why did

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 2>you go down this route with the investor rather than

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 2>just kind of a straight equity kind of deal.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 9>Good morning, Ed, Thanks for having me. It's a pleasure

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 9>to be on a show.

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 8>PDG has grown at a phenomenal radar of the last

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 8>six years, as you mentioned, and we have three of

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 8>the world's largest investors Warburck, Binkers Ontario, Teacher's Mension Plan

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 8>and more La. And we are a juncture where we

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 8>thought it's a great time to have an alternative investor,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 8>an infrastructure investor like Stone Pig coming. That gives us

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 8>tremendous level optionality how we can grow from here. For example,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 8>Warburg still is interested to grow with the company. They

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 8>see a tremendous growth ahead and they having been in

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 8>the business for seven.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 9>Years, they have key to continue for some more time.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 8>So that with that in mind, an opportunity grow also

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 8>consolidate our position in the market by mergers and acquisitions

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 8>and other means. Gives us an opportunity to really scale

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 8>up like and be a market leader in this part

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 8>of the world. And Stone Peak really brought a tremendous

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 8>solution that fitted for what we are looking for. And

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 8>that position says well to capture the air growth that

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 8>just started off in Asia.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got to talk about that air growth. But really quickly,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 2>were there other investors knocking down your door other than

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Stone Peak?

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I think we had a lot of interest in

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 8>the market of different folks than large private reforms as

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 8>well as out in funds and so on, and as

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 8>well as the insiders who are very keen and s

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 8>don't Peak turned out of the best solution for what

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 8>we're looking for.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 2>So the big question is what happens next? Right, RANGU,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>you operate in six nations across Asia. What's the next market?

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 2>And when you think about the next market you enter,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 2>how much is it part of the equation how quickly

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 2>you can build and start operations at any one facility.

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's a very important aspect of what the market

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 9>is looking for.

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 8>If you look at what our customers look for, our

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 8>customers are large hyperscalers. These are some of the largest

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 8>tech companies from the West Coast. As you know, you

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 8>know there are two things that matter for these customers

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 8>when they are expanding in a market like Asia, they

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 8>want to look for partners who have an execution track record,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 8>our track record that is UNPI impeccable in the market. Second,

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 8>they look for operators who have deep capital partners and

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 8>PDG brings both to this markets. With that in mind,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 8>our strategy is not to expand in new markets. Get

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 8>into new markets like Australia and South Korea.

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 9>That's on a plan.

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 8>And second, deepen in the markets that we're already in

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 8>like Japan, like India, which are huge markets in the making,

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 8>and our strategies to go in and deepen in those

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 8>markets as well.

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 9>As enter new markets.

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 8>That gives us to be a great partner, a trusted

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 8>partner for the US cyberskillers who are expanding in these

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 8>markets at a rate like we have never seen before.

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Rangu I think back to Meta's last earnings call and

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the explanation that one of the reasons they raised the

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>capital expenditures get guidance and range wasn't just the commitment,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 2>but it was the higher cost of doing business, the

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>higher cost in the supply chain for data center. Do

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.239
<v Speaker 2>you see higher costs in your supply chain right now?

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 9>Are not yet ed?

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 8>We haven't seen the implications of any market dynamics that

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 8>are impacting our supply chain. We have a pretty much

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 8>good lock in over for the next couple of years

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 8>on a complete supply chain. And also the good news

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 8>is for US a large part of our supplier manufacturing

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 8>happens in Asia, and that gives is an edge in

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 8>terms of the cost.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 9>Being lower being part of the side of the world.

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 8>So overall we are not seeing cost pressures yet at

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 8>the same time, we are seeing a tremendous level.

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 9>Of supply opportunities. When it comes to power. For example,

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 9>they are parts of Asia where there's significant excess power

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 9>and good quality power.

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 8>That gives U an opportunity to build these large scale

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 8>AI data centers which are closer to this good supply

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 8>of power at very reasonable cost, and that really positions

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 8>operators like WEDG in Asia very well in.

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.959
<v Speaker 9>The eyes of the large US hyperskillers.

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Rang you, I know you just raised a significant chunk

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of change that I got to ask about IPO and

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 2>when you're thinking about a listing.

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 9>I think we are well positioned to do a couple

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 9>of things.

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 8>Either do an IPO in the near term, there's a

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 8>trade cell opportunity, but the bigger exciting thing it is

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 8>to really consolidate a position in the market. We believe

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 8>the market tells us we are one of the two

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 8>or three top players in him pact, and then we grow.

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 8>At this page, we have an opportunity really consolid in

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 8>the market by making acquicisions and be a much bigger

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 8>scale in the next three to four years, and that

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 8>gives an opportunity for us to go public.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Rangusal Game Chairman, CEO and co founder of Princeton Digital

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Group in the data center space. Great to have you

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>on the show. Now, coming up, Roadblocks CEO David Mazuki

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 2>joins us talk about the company's new age verification tech.

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Will it work, How will it work? All the questions

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>to come. This is Bloomberg Tech gaming platform Roadblocks is

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 2>introducing a new feature for verifying users ages. Take a

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>selfie and the AI will estimate the user's age. If

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the tech determines they're over thirteen, then the user will

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 2>have access to the new Trusted Connects feature where they

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>can chat freely with other Roadblocks users. Delighted to say

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that joining us now is Roadblocks's CEO David Bzooki. Dave,

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 2>good morning, Thank you for being back on Bloomberg Tech.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I find d tech so interesting here. Could we just

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>go over the basics of how it works and why

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 2>this is the right technology for this issue.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, thank you.

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 7>Know we've been innovating on safety and civility for almost

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 7>twenty years, and what we're rolling out today is our

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 7>vision for age based communication. Age based communication, especially for

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 7>teens thirteen through seventeen, which is a vulnerable time, involves

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 7>a couple things. First, trusted connections, so identifying friends and

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 7>people that you know and trust, and second, using age

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 7>estimation to enable trusted connections to.

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 9>Actually allow those teens to speak a little.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 7>More freely on our platform, even though we do scan

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 7>the text for critical harms. And this is super important

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 7>because business notwithstanding, engagement notwithstanding, we're trying to keep people

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 7>on our platform so they don't jump to other platforms

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 7>where they may share images or where they may communicate

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 7>without text monitoring.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Dave, the skeptic here will say, well, well, how good

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 2>is the AI. How can the video and an AI

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>analysis of it analysis of it guarantee a correct result

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 2>that the person using it is indeed age thirteen or older.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 9>I want to highlight a couple of things.

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 7>We've been innovating on AI for four years plus and

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 7>we're running over two hundred AI systems. We've open sourced

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 7>our voice moderation system because it's so good, and we've

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 7>really advanced the state of the art and text moderation

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 7>systems as well. This is age estimation. The AI is

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 7>really good. It's not perfect, of course, but we're leaning

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 7>conservative in that case, and I'll highlight we're using this

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 7>in a conservative way to enable freer communication that is

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 7>still monitored. So we've really thought a lot about it,

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 7>and we think this is the future of how teens

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 7>will communicate.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>In testing, what is the proportion bin of sort of

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 2>false positives and accurate results? And is there an element

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>of sort of human moderation in the first instance.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well I want to highlight there for historically there's

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 7>always been an element of moderation on roadblocks and all techs,

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 7>all voice, all images has always gone through moderation, including

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 7>AI and human moderation.

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 9>So we have such a firm foundation for safety.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 7>We're using age estimation to in a way slightly free

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 7>up the communication. If you and I were fourteen on

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 7>roadblocks and you called me a butt head.

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 9>I wouldn't see it. We'd see a bunch of hashtags.

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 7>But it's the kind of a lot of teams like

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 7>to chat about. And when it's with people you know

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 7>and trust, we're open to letting them communicate more freely

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 7>in that way.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Dave is probably really helpful to put this in the

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 2>context of a case study example, and Grow a Garden

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 2>is probably the best right. So if you just bear

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 2>with me, and then we bring it back to product safety,

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 2>there are all of these teenagers wanting to be on

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Grow a Garden and then share with their peers, right

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 2>their friends, their community of a similar age. How does

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 2>this new technology fit into the daily running of that

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 2>game and how players and users interact with one another.

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, thanks for highlighting Grow a Garden.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 7>Just as last summer, Dressed to Impress was going crazy

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 7>on roadblocks. Right now Grow a Garden, who sit over

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 7>twenty million people playing it at the same time, which

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 7>is actually a record, we believe for any game in

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 7>the history of gaming. People really want to hang out

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 7>with their friends and communicate. And up until now, if

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.320
<v Speaker 7>you and I were fifteen and we were trying to communicate,

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 7>once again, we might see some hashes and some blocking

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 7>when we're.

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.439
<v Speaker 9>Trying to compete in the game.

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 7>With the release of this, if we are trusted connections

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 7>and we can validate we're people we know and we trust,

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 7>and then we take a selfie to estimate our age,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 7>we're going to be able to communicate more freely and

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 7>have possibly more fun and Grow a Garden and be

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 7>less likely to go to some other platform where maybe

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 7>we start sharing selfies or things that we don't allow

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 7>on roadblocks.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, Dave, is Grow a Garden the biggest game you've

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>had ever?

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it's been very public. A couple of

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 7>weekends ago, we hit over thirty million people on roadblocks

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 7>playing at the same time, and for a moment in time,

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 7>Grow a Garden hit over twenty million people playing at

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 7>the same time. It's not just the biggest we've ever

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.760
<v Speaker 7>had on roadblocks. That is, we believe the largest concurrent

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 7>player of any game in history.

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 2>And just very quickly, Dave, would you just define largest

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 2>concurrent played?

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 7>We believe from the Guinness Book of World Records that

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 7>twenty million is the largest concurrent players of any game

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 7>in real time in history.

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, understood what many people don't appreciate about Roadblocks is

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the scale of your own infrastructure. I think that you

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 2>run yourself. You have a lot of footprint on prem

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>with all the activity. Are your servers and CPUs just

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 2>melting on Friday and Saturday nights or how are you

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 2>handling all of the traffic right now?

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 7>Well, we do like it when our servers melt, as

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 7>long as we stay live and we stay up. And

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.240
<v Speaker 7>what we have done over the last couple of years

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 7>is abstracted all of this infrastructure we have, and you're

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 7>absolutely correct. We believe we get better performance, better reliability,

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 7>and better cost building out all of our own data

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 7>centers around the world. We have started working with partners though,

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 7>and you know those partners as you're Amazon AWSGCP at

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 7>peak times to burst into their cloud as well, and

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 7>so we can run all of our own infro, but

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 7>for Saturday morning for two hours, we're actually relying on

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 7>some of these partners to hit those peaks.

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 9>Dave.

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Roadblocks has been subject to a lot of scrutiny over

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 2>child safety, the feature that you're announcing today, but also

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 2>the sort of technological capability for you as the leader

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 2>of this company. Where does it rank and what you

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 2>think will sort of address those historic issues but also

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 2>just allow you to move forward in growing because you

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 2>have an ambition right to capture ten percent of the market,

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>and I'm just trying to understand how this piece of

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 2>tech allows you to tap into a demographic that will

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 2>get you there.

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 7>We've been focusing on safety civility as top priority for

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 7>almost twenty years. We believe this is the future of

0:38:56.520 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 7>communication on social platforms, especiallys, and we believe the future

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 7>will be for teens in that vulnerable time, trusted connections,

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 7>plus some form of age estimation or verification or maybe

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 7>someday help from the phone vendors and other things, but

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 7>ultimately for private chat. We believe this is the future.

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 7>So we're we haven't been waiting for the law. We

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 7>haven't been waiting for legislation. We think this thirteen through

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.439
<v Speaker 7>seventeen segment is just as important. It's thirteen and under

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 7>and eighteen and nine.

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 2>We didn't even get to advertising on the platform. All

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of the millionaires that are being minted through the platform.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Dave Bazooki, you have to come back, CEO of Roadblocks,

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Now coming up, Netflix readies to

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>release its results. What to expect from the streaming giant

0:39:45.320 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 2>that's coming up next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Netflix drops

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>earnings after the bell and no subscriber numbers won't be

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 2>in the script anymore. The hot scenes to watch out

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 2>for Netflix's operating margin forecast currently twenty nine percent. Will

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 2>advertisers keep tuning in? Is the ad tear ramps up

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and can management tees out new growth from live sports

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and big name content deals? And with that key stat

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>subscriber growth left on the cutting room floor, engagement could

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 2>steal the spotlight, especially with a killer second half lineup

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Squid Game, Stranger Things, Wednesday, Knives Out, Taylor v. Serrano

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 2>three and even NFL and key track of price hikes?

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Will they be padding the bottom line all year long?

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned because we've got more with Bloombo's Ryan Selica,

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 2>because this earnings episode might just be binge worthy puns aside, Ryan,

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 2>what's Wall Street's in?

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 9>Hey?

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And thanks for having me on?

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 11>So everyone is pretty optimistic about Netflix's position right now.

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 11>They continue to benefit from a lot of very strong

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 11>secular trends, not just the shift towards streaming, but also

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 11>their ability to continue growing ad revenue on their platform,

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 11>their continued embrace of live events like sports as a

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 11>way to further juice the sort of ad part of

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 11>the business.

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 2>The only question is is all this expected?

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 11>Is all this price into the stock and our expectations

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 11>too high? Given the stock has been one of the

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 11>real standout performers of the year.

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Right year to date, the stock up forty one percent

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:48.399
<v Speaker 2>so far in twenty twenty five. Netflix has been saying

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 2>for quite a long time, we want you to judge

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 2>us by normal financial metrics that all other industries and

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 2>companies are judged by. I said, we won't get that

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 2>subscribe account or subscribe a growth. So from a top

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 2>or bottom line perspective, what is it that we look

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 2>to in Netflix?

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 11>I think anything they say about their outlook from here,

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 11>what they're going to be spending on content, their continued

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 11>ability to sort of improve efficiency and kind of improve

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 11>their cash flow, their earnings, all that is going to

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 11>be taking the place of subscriber numbers, especially since at

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 11>least here in the States pretty well saturated, are pretty

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 11>well positioned across the globe, so I think that might

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 11>be of less interest to people right now. But certainly

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 11>you mentioned all the content they have coming out. People

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 11>are very interested to see are some of the games

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 11>that we've been seeing already this year. Is that likely

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 11>to continue or are they do for some kind of

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 11>consolidation here. On a separate note, I'd also be very

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 11>interested on anything they say about competition from sort of

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 11>newer entrants, things like YouTube and TikTok, or those areas

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 11>where Netflix maybe faces some competition, as like new places

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 11>that people are going to view content.

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I pay for the non ad tear. I've just completed

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Squid Game season three, I'm watching The Sandman. That's a

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 2>bit of a miss with me. But if I were

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to pay for a tier where ads were involved, what

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 2>are we learning about advertising a Netflix's platform, Because this

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 2>is an industry wide thing right now.

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we are seeing more companies start to explore these

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 11>kinds of options. Obviously, Netflix has a huge subscriber based

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 11>here in the States.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, hundreds of millions of people use it.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 11>I think they even sort of automatically putting some people

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 11>on the ad tier because if people are watching it enough,

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.439
<v Speaker 11>you're actually making more money with the ad revenue from

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 11>those viewers than you would beginning if they were paying

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 11>up for the higher tier that doesn't include advertising.

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.839
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Ryan Plaseelca with the Netflix preview, thank you very much.

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 2>So that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Stick with us. At twelve thirty PM New York time,

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 2>nine point thirty here in San Francisco, we have an

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 2>exclusive interview with the Lucid interim CEO Mark Winterhoff. With

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 2>that stock up more than forty percent, don't forget check

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 2>out the podcast. You know where to find it on

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal and Bloomberg platforms, as well as online

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 2>on Spotify, iHeart and on Apple. From San Francisco, this

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech