1
00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:14,400
Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to the last Stephonomics of In twelve months,

2
00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:17,680
Speaker 1: we've been around the world many times with our reports

3
00:00:17,720 --> 00:00:20,479
Speaker 1: from the front lines of the global economy, from the

4
00:00:20,520 --> 00:00:24,520
Speaker 1: Fort Lauderdale Boat Show to the Canton Fair in Guandoux

5
00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:30,400
Speaker 1: Via Santiago, Berlin, South Central India, and a farm equipment

6
00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:35,200
Speaker 1: factory in Broadhead, Wisconsin. We've also talked to many world

7
00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:39,960
Speaker 1: leading economists, including two winners of the Nobel Prize. Not

8
00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:42,680
Speaker 1: bad when you consider that all the people involved in

9
00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:46,360
Speaker 1: this podcast also have quite busy day jobs. And we're

10
00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:49,280
Speaker 1: not putting our feet up this week just because it's Christmas.

11
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:52,640
Speaker 1: Oh No. Instead, you're going to hear from a third

12
00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:56,640
Speaker 1: Nobel Prize winner, the economist Joe Stiglets, a conversation I

13
00:00:56,680 --> 00:00:58,960
Speaker 1: had with him recently in London when he was here

14
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:01,880
Speaker 1: to deliver a lecture on progressive capitalism at the London

15
00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:05,960
Speaker 1: School of Economics. If progressive capitalism was on your Christmas

16
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:09,319
Speaker 1: list this year, you should listen in. But first a

17
00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:12,880
Speaker 1: return trip to Vietnam, a country we've talked about surprisingly

18
00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:16,120
Speaker 1: often here on Stephanomics. Now, if you've paid attention, then

19
00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:19,600
Speaker 1: you'll remember it's been a winner and a loser in

20
00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:23,080
Speaker 1: the US China trade Wars. It's complicated, but what you

21
00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:25,880
Speaker 1: probably don't know is that it might be about to

22
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:29,600
Speaker 1: light up your next Christmas. Here's our South Asian Economy

23
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:57,520
Speaker 1: correspondent Michelle jam Briskin to explain what good ah Yes Christmas, or,

24
00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:02,120
Speaker 1: more specifically, the classic holiday movie National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation.

25
00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:05,400
Speaker 1: You just heard the part when Clark Griswold drains all

26
00:02:05,440 --> 00:02:07,400
Speaker 1: the electricity in the city to light up what must

27
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:11,680
Speaker 1: be a million bulbs covering his big suburban house. Americans

28
00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:13,600
Speaker 1: have been putting lights up since they became affordable in

29
00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:16,920
Speaker 1: the mid twentieth century. It's a half billion dollar business

30
00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:20,000
Speaker 1: even if you only count those US customers, and in

31
00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:22,320
Speaker 1: recent years, virtually all the lights made in the world

32
00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:26,480
Speaker 1: come from one place, China. As an American economic journalists

33
00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:28,960
Speaker 1: based in Singapore, I found myself in a good position

34
00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:32,120
Speaker 1: to explore this issue as it touches on two major stories,

35
00:02:32,600 --> 00:02:34,920
Speaker 1: the US China Trade War as well as the rise

36
00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:44,000
Speaker 1: of Vietnam's economy. My colleague win Win and I decided

37
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:46,240
Speaker 1: to head to a street and Hannoi's old quarter called

38
00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:50,359
Speaker 1: hang Ma or Vodo Street in English. It's a spectacularly

39
00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:54,639
Speaker 1: colorful road whose shops are overflowing with Christmas decorations. At

40
00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:56,840
Speaker 1: other times of the year, there are goods for holidays

41
00:02:56,880 --> 00:02:59,280
Speaker 1: like Lunar New Year, or paper products that are burned

42
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:03,200
Speaker 1: in rituals. Dead catd to lost loved ones. By early December,

43
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,760
Speaker 1: there are Santa suits, reindeer wreaths, snowmen, garland, and Christmas

44
00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:09,639
Speaker 1: lights as far as the eye can see. But even

45
00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,240
Speaker 1: if it's beginning to look a lot like Christmas, the

46
00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:15,120
Speaker 1: mood this year feels a little bit off. We met

47
00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:18,320
Speaker 1: a shopkeeper named new in quan Hui. He's thirty five

48
00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:25,240
Speaker 1: and has been selling on Hangma for five years. Sales

49
00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:28,359
Speaker 1: have been slow this year due to too many reasons.

50
00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:31,600
Speaker 1: One is because there are so many suppliers this year,

51
00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:36,160
Speaker 1: they flooded the street with Chinese stuff. Secondly is people

52
00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:41,440
Speaker 1: cutting down on spending this year. Take just one of

53
00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:45,120
Speaker 1: those items flooding the streets Christmas lights. For many years,

54
00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:48,360
Speaker 1: China was essentially the only country in the world producing them.

55
00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:51,360
Speaker 1: The data suggests that might be changing. Of course, the

56
00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:53,360
Speaker 1: trade war has been waged not in the name of

57
00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:56,880
Speaker 1: Christmas lights. It's supposed to be about America's ballooning trade

58
00:03:56,920 --> 00:04:00,440
Speaker 1: deficit with China and allegations over intellectual proper e theft.

59
00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:03,520
Speaker 1: But the supply chain for Christmas lights shows just how

60
00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:06,560
Speaker 1: difficult it is for the US to penalize China without

61
00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:16,680
Speaker 1: also making things more difficult on American soil. We dug

62
00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:19,360
Speaker 1: into US customs shipping data to figure it all out.

63
00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:23,359
Speaker 1: Christmas lights actually have their own six digit international code

64
00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:27,560
Speaker 1: and category. US imports from China this specific item by

65
00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:30,160
Speaker 1: sea have declined over the past year and a half,

66
00:04:30,520 --> 00:04:34,359
Speaker 1: while those from Vietnam have surged from almost nothing. Other data,

67
00:04:34,360 --> 00:04:37,560
Speaker 1: which includes shipments by sea and air show Cambodia is

68
00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:40,680
Speaker 1: also sending a lot of Christmas lights to America. All

69
00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:42,839
Speaker 1: this is happening after Christmas lights got caught up in

70
00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:45,560
Speaker 1: the trade war. They were originally slapped with a ten

71
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:50,960
Speaker 1: duty effective in September, that went up to and May

72
00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:54,039
Speaker 1: of this year, and that phase one agreement between the

73
00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:57,080
Speaker 1: US and China to reduce tariffs on some goods, it

74
00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:01,640
Speaker 1: doesn't cover Christmas lights, so the higher duties remain. What's more,

75
00:05:02,040 --> 00:05:05,520
Speaker 1: Christmas lights are tangled in a bigger trend. Chinese companies

76
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:08,160
Speaker 1: are trying to find ways to offset lost business directly

77
00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,159
Speaker 1: to the US. One solution is to route those same

78
00:05:11,200 --> 00:05:14,919
Speaker 1: products through third countries for final production. Another is to

79
00:05:14,960 --> 00:05:19,400
Speaker 1: find new customer basis like Vietnam. Here's Jacque mor Say,

80
00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:23,040
Speaker 1: the World Bank's lead Vietnam economist, talking about Vietnam's dilemma.

81
00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:26,880
Speaker 1: Is a winning on a temporary basis because you have

82
00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:29,680
Speaker 1: a press adjustment. So that was taking place and I

83
00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:34,080
Speaker 1: think magnified what was taking place before, you know, moving

84
00:05:34,120 --> 00:05:37,960
Speaker 1: from China to Vietnam. So I think it's a temporary again.

85
00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:42,280
Speaker 1: At same time, just temporary again doesn't have to be

86
00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:44,080
Speaker 1: too big because the way you will be on the

87
00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:46,719
Speaker 1: radar screen of the U s stor it is more,

88
00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:49,599
Speaker 1: Say says. The increase in the official data for Vietnam's

89
00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:52,760
Speaker 1: exports is clear, but it isn't matched by figures on

90
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:56,760
Speaker 1: foreign direct investment or FDI. That makes it more difficult

91
00:05:56,760 --> 00:05:59,640
Speaker 1: to calculate how much Vietnam is winning and whether the

92
00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:03,120
Speaker 1: winning can be sustained. You would expect it being increasing

93
00:06:03,160 --> 00:06:04,720
Speaker 1: in the dy from China. You don't see it to

94
00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:09,720
Speaker 1: the data for items like Christmas lights that have shown

95
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:12,479
Speaker 1: a discernible shift, and all too often from made in

96
00:06:12,560 --> 00:06:15,680
Speaker 1: China to made in Vietnam. The trend is concerning for

97
00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:19,880
Speaker 1: Vietnam's government. That's because Vietnam is stuck in a delicate balance,

98
00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:22,279
Speaker 1: almost as if trying to learn how to win quietly

99
00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:25,600
Speaker 1: in the trade war. Investors have cheered an economy that's

100
00:06:25,600 --> 00:06:28,760
Speaker 1: growing at an almost seven percent pace. K Sarah, Sharp,

101
00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:30,880
Speaker 1: and Nintendo are among the big names that have been

102
00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:34,960
Speaker 1: expanding in Vietnam amid the US China tensions. But Vietnam

103
00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:38,359
Speaker 1: has also felt the sting of winning too much. In July,

104
00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:41,480
Speaker 1: the U s slap tariffs of more than on steel

105
00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:45,160
Speaker 1: from Vietnam. America accused the nation of not doing enough

106
00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:47,960
Speaker 1: to prevent tear off goods from being trafficked through their ports.

107
00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:52,960
Speaker 1: Vietnamese customs officials have taken the charge seriously, especially this year.

108
00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:55,880
Speaker 1: They see a high risk of trade fraud, and they

109
00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:57,839
Speaker 1: talk about not wanting to be used as a pawn

110
00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:00,640
Speaker 1: in the trade war. They're keeping a list of items

111
00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:04,200
Speaker 1: that have drifted from Chinese origin to Vietnamese origin. What

112
00:07:04,320 --> 00:07:06,280
Speaker 1: they don't want to see are new labels on an

113
00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:10,160
Speaker 1: item that was actually completed elsewhere. So what does meet

114
00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:13,480
Speaker 1: in Vietnam actually mean? In the case of Christmas lights?

115
00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:16,280
Speaker 1: It appears to mean finished or near finished Chinese goods

116
00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:19,680
Speaker 1: finding their way over the border before export. That's what

117
00:07:19,720 --> 00:07:23,920
Speaker 1: another shopkeeper back on Hangma is seeing. Here's new antih.

118
00:07:26,040 --> 00:07:29,200
Speaker 1: There are some local companies that brought material and parts

119
00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:32,520
Speaker 1: from China and assembled them into these Kai supplies to sell.

120
00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:35,760
Speaker 1: They can't produce by themselves because it would cause them

121
00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:41,720
Speaker 1: way more than importing paths from China to assemble. Likewise,

122
00:07:41,720 --> 00:07:44,680
Speaker 1: on the u S side, companies that import Christmas lights

123
00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:48,600
Speaker 1: emphasized the supply chain ships couldn't happen overnight, even if

124
00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:52,800
Speaker 1: they were enthusiastic to buy from Vietnam. Doug Topham the

125
00:07:52,840 --> 00:07:55,720
Speaker 1: owner of a business called Christmas Light Decorators in Arizona,

126
00:07:56,480 --> 00:07:59,600
Speaker 1: so the search for supplier outside of China has been fruitless.

127
00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:03,280
Speaker 1: He's been importing Christmas lights from China since two thousand

128
00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:06,520
Speaker 1: five and was looking to avoid Hefty's hairriff bills this year.

129
00:08:07,400 --> 00:08:10,120
Speaker 1: He forded an email from one supplier who suggested that

130
00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:13,320
Speaker 1: he falsify his invoice with a lower value to offset

131
00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,960
Speaker 1: the tariffs. Others offered to repackage the lights, either with

132
00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:20,760
Speaker 1: an erroneous origin or with a different company name. Topham

133
00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:23,440
Speaker 1: said he just wants to play by the rules. For

134
00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:27,000
Speaker 1: this Christmas season. Topham kept his order similar to previous years,

135
00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:29,880
Speaker 1: but he is looking elsewhere in Asia for next year's orders.

136
00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:34,800
Speaker 1: He's unlikely to find a Vietnamese supplier. Several larger Vietnamese

137
00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:38,600
Speaker 1: lighting companies don't produce Christmas lights specifically. They told us

138
00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:41,280
Speaker 1: that they very much doubted that any Christmas lights exported

139
00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:45,480
Speaker 1: from Vietnam were actually made by Vietnamese businesses. For those

140
00:08:45,480 --> 00:08:49,040
Speaker 1: selling Christmas lights and other festive gear along Hangma, that's

141
00:08:49,080 --> 00:08:52,240
Speaker 1: just fine. They don't see Vietnam trying to replicate the

142
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:56,560
Speaker 1: Chinese model of mass export of cheaper goods. Drawn nuc

143
00:08:56,640 --> 00:08:59,880
Speaker 1: On is a fifty three year old veteran shopkeeper on Hangma.

144
00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:06,559
Speaker 1: Here's how she put it, tank to you have even

145
00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:09,240
Speaker 1: these companies cannot make these kinds supplies because it will

146
00:09:09,320 --> 00:09:12,000
Speaker 1: cost them a lot more than Jennese products, so they

147
00:09:12,040 --> 00:09:16,400
Speaker 1: can compete. I hadn't seen any locally made ones. When

148
00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:20,000
Speaker 1: Jennese producers lower the prices of their products, the poet

149
00:09:20,360 --> 00:09:23,160
Speaker 1: is also poorer. But it's very easy for us to

150
00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:26,400
Speaker 1: sell this Chinese stuff because they have many new designs

151
00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:30,200
Speaker 1: and the prices are so cheap. Some items just cost

152
00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:32,200
Speaker 1: even less than a pup of tea or a bowl

153
00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:42,079
Speaker 1: of foot back for those hawking goods along Hang Ma further,

154
00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:44,400
Speaker 1: trade war piece could go a long way to making

155
00:09:44,400 --> 00:09:47,920
Speaker 1: for a merrier Christmas next year. In the meantime, the

156
00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,760
Speaker 1: price tag for Clark, Griswold and everyone else is at

157
00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:54,720
Speaker 1: a high risk of staying more expensive. For Bloomberg News,

158
00:09:54,920 --> 00:10:12,760
Speaker 1: this is Michelle Jammer. Still m M. I wonder whether

159
00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:17,840
Speaker 1: we'll hear from Vietnam again in But now here's that

160
00:10:17,920 --> 00:10:21,040
Speaker 1: conversation I had with the Nobel Prize being an economist,

161
00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:31,959
Speaker 1: Joe Stiglets here in London. So, Professor Joe Stiglets, thank

162
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:35,520
Speaker 1: you very much for taking the time in London. You

163
00:10:35,640 --> 00:10:39,680
Speaker 1: were here in London doing a lecture to the London

164
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:44,199
Speaker 1: School of Economics asking the question, is progressive capitalism an

165
00:10:44,240 --> 00:10:50,760
Speaker 1: answer to America's problems? So do you think it is? Yes? Uh,

166
00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:54,800
Speaker 1: Maybe I should explain what I mean by progressive capitalism

167
00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:58,880
Speaker 1: in a way of a new card tract between the

168
00:10:58,960 --> 00:11:02,880
Speaker 1: market of the states of a society. The market will

169
00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:08,040
Speaker 1: play a role. Some people say progressive capitalism is an oxymoron.

170
00:11:08,679 --> 00:11:12,400
Speaker 1: I think you cannot run a complex society without some

171
00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:15,680
Speaker 1: degree of decentralization, and markets are going to play an

172
00:11:15,679 --> 00:11:18,520
Speaker 1: important role. Corporations are going to play role in that

173
00:11:19,360 --> 00:11:26,920
Speaker 1: decentralization process. But the kind of unbalanced market economy, unfettered

174
00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:30,200
Speaker 1: capitalism that we've had in the United States and in

175
00:11:30,280 --> 00:11:35,880
Speaker 1: many other countries is the central cause of many of

176
00:11:35,920 --> 00:11:40,200
Speaker 1: the problems the United States is facing. The growing inequality,

177
00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:46,640
Speaker 1: the oprioch prices, the child diabetes crices, the climate prices

178
00:11:46,679 --> 00:11:50,559
Speaker 1: that we have not responded to, and even in to

179
00:11:50,679 --> 00:11:54,200
Speaker 1: a larger them, the political crisis, you say, and Steals

180
00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:56,719
Speaker 1: actually said that one of the reasons that we've got

181
00:11:56,760 --> 00:11:59,240
Speaker 1: into a message that we failed to understand the true

182
00:11:59,280 --> 00:12:02,920
Speaker 1: sources of What do you mean by that, Well, the

183
00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:06,040
Speaker 1: true source the reason that we have such a higher

184
00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:08,360
Speaker 1: standard living today than we did two hundred fifty years

185
00:12:08,400 --> 00:12:15,160
Speaker 1: ago after centuries and centuries of stagnation, is the advance

186
00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:19,960
Speaker 1: is brought about by science and the advances in social organization.

187
00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:27,600
Speaker 1: Running a complex, innovative manufacturing post manufacturing economy requires a

188
00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:32,640
Speaker 1: lot of cooperation and coordination, requires collective action, not only

189
00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:39,480
Speaker 1: individuals acting individually, and needs regulations, and needs the role

190
00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:47,760
Speaker 1: of the state to promote basic research, UH, infrastructure, technology, technology, education,

191
00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:55,400
Speaker 1: and the dominant doctrine ideology of the last part of years.

192
00:12:55,880 --> 00:13:01,200
Speaker 1: Neoliberalism didn't pay attention to these pub days. And it

193
00:13:01,280 --> 00:13:06,040
Speaker 1: made one more mistake. UH. It confused what made individuals

194
00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:11,400
Speaker 1: wealthy with what makes the wealth of a nation. So

195
00:13:11,720 --> 00:13:15,280
Speaker 1: individuals can get wealthy by taking money from other individuals,

196
00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:19,200
Speaker 1: by exploiting them, by using market power, by taking advantage

197
00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:21,920
Speaker 1: of their vulnerabilities. And we see a lot of people

198
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:25,719
Speaker 1: becoming very wealthy through that kind of activity that economists

199
00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:30,439
Speaker 1: referred to as rent seeking wealth grapping. UH. The real

200
00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:32,960
Speaker 1: source of the wealth of nation and are as I said,

201
00:13:33,000 --> 00:13:43,840
Speaker 1: these big advances the people who discovered DNA, people transistor lasers. Interestingly,

202
00:13:44,200 --> 00:13:47,080
Speaker 1: none of these people are among the wealthiest people in

203
00:13:47,080 --> 00:13:51,880
Speaker 1: our country. And among the wealthiest people are those who

204
00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:55,600
Speaker 1: have become wealthy through him seeking. And of course there

205
00:13:55,640 --> 00:14:00,680
Speaker 1: are some people who made a contribution, achieved some degreement,

206
00:14:00,679 --> 00:14:04,719
Speaker 1: ample power, but really amplified their wealth through this kind

207
00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:11,040
Speaker 1: of exploitation. I guess I should. It's a lot of people. Certainly,

208
00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:15,480
Speaker 1: some economists I've seen recently have been highlighting how strong,

209
00:14:15,559 --> 00:14:18,200
Speaker 1: how good the economy is looking relative to a lot

210
00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:20,360
Speaker 1: of other past elections. If you look at the us

211
00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:23,000
Speaker 1: UM I saw one estimate that kind of the tail

212
00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:26,200
Speaker 1: winds for a presidential election. If you're looking at the

213
00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:28,680
Speaker 1: level of unemployment, if you're looking at growth, you're looking

214
00:14:28,720 --> 00:14:32,760
Speaker 1: at the level of inflation, Mortgage rates, debt levels are

215
00:14:32,840 --> 00:14:35,560
Speaker 1: all actually much better than they have been in quite

216
00:14:35,560 --> 00:14:39,680
Speaker 1: a long time. Even wages for the lower part of

217
00:14:39,720 --> 00:14:43,360
Speaker 1: the wage spectrum, after a long time of stagnation, have

218
00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:46,160
Speaker 1: actually been doing better in the last few years. So

219
00:14:46,760 --> 00:14:49,800
Speaker 1: is this is this critique sort of failing to notice

220
00:14:49,840 --> 00:14:52,440
Speaker 1: what's actually happening out there? No at no, I mean

221
00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:56,880
Speaker 1: it's taking nada quarter by quarter, or by moderate month

222
00:14:56,960 --> 00:14:59,200
Speaker 1: or day by day. Perspective is looking at it over

223
00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:01,960
Speaker 1: a longer period at the time. But even if you

224
00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:05,600
Speaker 1: look more narrowly what's been happening in the last few years,

225
00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:11,440
Speaker 1: you see some real indicators that things are not going well. Uh.

226
00:15:11,760 --> 00:15:15,480
Speaker 1: Growth for instance, is slow from three point one percent

227
00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:23,440
Speaker 1: down to one after a massive tax cut, resulting in

228
00:15:23,480 --> 00:15:27,960
Speaker 1: a trillion dollar deficit this year, probably the largest deficit

229
00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:31,720
Speaker 1: that we've had in peacetime out of a recession. Life

230
00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:37,600
Speaker 1: expectancy is in decline. This should happen in a country

231
00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:42,000
Speaker 1: where we're breaking all the frontiers in medical research. It's

232
00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:46,720
Speaker 1: because we have a broken healthcare system. Students are graduating

233
00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:51,080
Speaker 1: with massive amounts of debt that's strangling their ability to

234
00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:56,000
Speaker 1: start a family and UH live up to their dreams

235
00:15:56,000 --> 00:16:02,120
Speaker 1: and aspirations. Median income is stagnante. Real wages at the

236
00:16:02,120 --> 00:16:04,520
Speaker 1: bottom at the same level as they were sixty years ago.

237
00:16:05,560 --> 00:16:08,440
Speaker 1: Media and income of a full time mail worker and

238
00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:11,800
Speaker 1: the full time men are the lucky ones, is the

239
00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:14,360
Speaker 1: same as it was more than forty years ago. This

240
00:16:14,440 --> 00:16:17,720
Speaker 1: is not a picture that of a prosperous economy. The

241
00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:21,800
Speaker 1: unemployment rate may be relatively low, but the employment rate

242
00:16:22,200 --> 00:16:24,840
Speaker 1: is also relatively low. A lot of people dropped out

243
00:16:24,880 --> 00:16:28,440
Speaker 1: of the labor force. So when I see the picture

244
00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:31,160
Speaker 1: of the economy, and when I don't use a number

245
00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:34,040
Speaker 1: of like GDP, it it is one of the indicators.

246
00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:38,720
Speaker 1: But what really matters is how well ordinary citizens are doing,

247
00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:43,720
Speaker 1: and in those terms, things aren't so rosy. I'm interested.

248
00:16:43,840 --> 00:16:47,560
Speaker 1: I mean, you won your your Naval prosper Economics for

249
00:16:47,640 --> 00:16:52,479
Speaker 1: your contributions to thinking about the way that information UH

250
00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:56,440
Speaker 1: played produces market well. Information failures and the market failures

251
00:16:56,480 --> 00:17:00,560
Speaker 1: in general asymmetries of knowledge and how they can contribute

252
00:17:00,560 --> 00:17:04,840
Speaker 1: to to inefficient outcomes. Do you think whether it's Elizabeth

253
00:17:04,840 --> 00:17:06,919
Speaker 1: Horn or anyone else, you know, a lot of people

254
00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:11,879
Speaker 1: recognize the market power of this massive internet companies globally

255
00:17:12,480 --> 00:17:17,680
Speaker 1: is posing an unprecedented issue for economies everywhere. The regulators

256
00:17:17,680 --> 00:17:23,840
Speaker 1: and governments are really struggling with Do you think that

257
00:17:24,160 --> 00:17:26,880
Speaker 1: she has a genuine answer? Do you think anyone has

258
00:17:27,280 --> 00:17:33,320
Speaker 1: a rigorous approach to this? Yes, I do. The clearly

259
00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:36,879
Speaker 1: the monopolies of century are different from standard royal and

260
00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:39,719
Speaker 1: the monopolies of the end of the nineteenth century or

261
00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:44,919
Speaker 1: twentieth century. UM. It's very clear that the anti drusservice,

262
00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:50,040
Speaker 1: our competition wives have not kept up with the changing economy. UM.

263
00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:53,360
Speaker 1: Our business leaders have had a kind of you might say,

264
00:17:53,640 --> 00:17:57,879
Speaker 1: resolution to increased market power that has not been met

265
00:17:58,040 --> 00:18:03,200
Speaker 1: with a publics. In fact, a major school in economics,

266
00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:08,760
Speaker 1: the Chicago School, took the view that markets are naturally competitive,

267
00:18:08,840 --> 00:18:11,119
Speaker 1: so don't worry about it. And actually there's been a

268
00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:15,400
Speaker 1: weakening of antitrust laws over the last fifty years, so

269
00:18:15,480 --> 00:18:18,560
Speaker 1: I think there is now a lot of focus on

270
00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:24,760
Speaker 1: where we made a mistake, both in weakening our competition

271
00:18:24,840 --> 00:18:28,320
Speaker 1: laws and in not keeping up with the new challenges

272
00:18:28,359 --> 00:18:33,720
Speaker 1: posed by the changes in our technology. I've been uh

273
00:18:33,760 --> 00:18:39,480
Speaker 1: participated in FTC hearings where these issues are are being discussed,

274
00:18:39,520 --> 00:18:42,800
Speaker 1: and I think there is a growing consensus at least

275
00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:47,080
Speaker 1: some elements that we need to begin with in making

276
00:18:47,119 --> 00:18:50,480
Speaker 1: our economy more competitive once again. Do you think I mean?

277
00:18:50,520 --> 00:18:53,199
Speaker 1: I was looking at some of the rulings over the years,

278
00:18:53,400 --> 00:18:54,960
Speaker 1: and there's a lot of people who are now written

279
00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:59,880
Speaker 1: about how effective the internet companies have been, the likes

280
00:18:59,920 --> 00:19:03,840
Speaker 1: of Google and Facebook and actually resisting regulatory pressure, even

281
00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:07,480
Speaker 1: to the point of not responding to letters. I wonder

282
00:19:07,520 --> 00:19:09,520
Speaker 1: what I mean when you look at some of these issues,

283
00:19:09,560 --> 00:19:11,880
Speaker 1: do you think is there a question about whether they've

284
00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:15,399
Speaker 1: just got too big to even respond to some of

285
00:19:15,440 --> 00:19:18,200
Speaker 1: these challenges from government? Are they now bigger than any

286
00:19:18,240 --> 00:19:22,960
Speaker 1: single government? They are even bigger than most governments. And

287
00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:26,399
Speaker 1: what is so striking is the kind of arrogance that

288
00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:32,280
Speaker 1: they've exhibited. Uh, they realize how powerful they are. Facebook

289
00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:36,320
Speaker 1: famously signed an agreement to respect privacy and then when

290
00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:39,880
Speaker 1: they had and violated it, well, they were fined over

291
00:19:39,960 --> 00:19:46,320
Speaker 1: five billion dollars. So there's just nothing regular standpoints, but

292
00:19:46,320 --> 00:19:48,720
Speaker 1: there's a lot by regular staying board, and they're put

293
00:19:48,720 --> 00:19:52,960
Speaker 1: out notice that they will be fine a lot more

294
00:19:53,560 --> 00:19:57,240
Speaker 1: if they don't comply with regulations. Tim Cook, the head

295
00:19:57,240 --> 00:20:02,159
Speaker 1: of Apple, famously, uh, of course, I'm not going to

296
00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:07,800
Speaker 1: pay taxes, uh, paraphrasing what he said in response to

297
00:20:08,800 --> 00:20:12,480
Speaker 1: what Apple didn't in our own But then he said,

298
00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:15,119
Speaker 1: but if you lowered the tax rate, then I'll comply.

299
00:20:15,280 --> 00:20:18,879
Speaker 1: In fact, you acting and say if you have a

300
00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:22,199
Speaker 1: tax rate that I agree with, then I'll pay. But

301
00:20:22,359 --> 00:20:26,200
Speaker 1: if you don't, of course I'm going to avoid taxes. Well,

302
00:20:26,960 --> 00:20:30,000
Speaker 1: countries around the world and are saying, you know, this

303
00:20:30,080 --> 00:20:35,520
Speaker 1: is not the way society functions. The remarkable thing is

304
00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:40,120
Speaker 1: that these tech giants grew on the basis of government

305
00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:46,480
Speaker 1: funded research. The Internet was a result of government spending,

306
00:20:47,240 --> 00:20:51,240
Speaker 1: The first browser was a result of government spending. All

307
00:20:51,320 --> 00:20:55,800
Speaker 1: the basic insights that have led to all these advances

308
00:20:55,800 --> 00:20:58,840
Speaker 1: were a result of government spending. So they're willing to take,

309
00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:04,400
Speaker 1: but they're not willing to reciprocate. And I think that's

310
00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:08,440
Speaker 1: not the basis of a social kind fract which you

311
00:21:08,520 --> 00:21:11,640
Speaker 1: can mean to a successful society. I should ask you

312
00:21:12,359 --> 00:21:16,000
Speaker 1: about the green new deal because I noticed we were

313
00:21:16,040 --> 00:21:18,760
Speaker 1: talking recently in Beijing with Nick Starn, who had written

314
00:21:18,800 --> 00:21:23,440
Speaker 1: the quite an important report or climate change, and think

315
00:21:23,480 --> 00:21:26,640
Speaker 1: about ten years ago. I noticed that you actually lead

316
00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:30,600
Speaker 1: a big report on environmental issues. Even longer ago, I

317
00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:33,200
Speaker 1: think the mid nineties. If you look, if you think

318
00:21:33,200 --> 00:21:35,480
Speaker 1: about the challenges you saw it then and you see

319
00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:38,479
Speaker 1: now how far we've come in in terms of the

320
00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:44,640
Speaker 1: warming of the planet, but also a new feeling of urgency. Finally,

321
00:21:45,040 --> 00:21:47,600
Speaker 1: on the political side, do you think we are now

322
00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:49,439
Speaker 1: in a better place, at least when it comes to

323
00:21:49,480 --> 00:21:51,360
Speaker 1: confronting it, even though we've let a lot of time

324
00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:55,920
Speaker 1: go by. Public reception is so much stronger today. Any

325
00:21:55,920 --> 00:22:00,159
Speaker 1: scientific knowledge when we did our report, no new vibe.

326
00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:07,000
Speaker 1: We were aware that global warming would lead to more

327
00:22:07,040 --> 00:22:11,880
Speaker 1: extreme events, but we didn't say that in our report

328
00:22:12,359 --> 00:22:17,720
Speaker 1: because the there was not overwhelming evidence of that. Today,

329
00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:21,439
Speaker 1: there is overwhelming evidence. The US has been losing almost

330
00:22:21,440 --> 00:22:25,119
Speaker 1: two percent of GDP using extreme events. People are realizing

331
00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:30,879
Speaker 1: we got extreme cold, its, fires, floods, hurricane cyclones, and

332
00:22:31,760 --> 00:22:35,880
Speaker 1: the young people particularly get it. And since the young

333
00:22:35,920 --> 00:22:38,560
Speaker 1: people are going to be the future of our of

334
00:22:38,560 --> 00:22:44,359
Speaker 1: our world. Uh, I am hopeful I am worried that

335
00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:48,320
Speaker 1: the you know, mistakes that we made is we did

336
00:22:48,359 --> 00:22:53,200
Speaker 1: not anticipate how fast things would change. And we understood

337
00:22:53,200 --> 00:22:56,000
Speaker 1: that there was an urgency, but we didn't understand how

338
00:22:56,200 --> 00:23:00,760
Speaker 1: urgent it was. Now we do and that why are

339
00:23:00,840 --> 00:23:03,639
Speaker 1: we responding fast enough? And next that I give you

340
00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:07,600
Speaker 1: trying it behind the Green New Deal, we need real

341
00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:11,240
Speaker 1: mobilization to arrest this issue. And when you look, I mean,

342
00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:13,520
Speaker 1: there are some who've said that the Green New Deal

343
00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:18,560
Speaker 1: is just so ambitious, um and so aggressive in its

344
00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:22,760
Speaker 1: timing that it could ultimately be be counterproductive because of

345
00:23:22,880 --> 00:23:26,840
Speaker 1: the sheer pace of what it's suggesting, you know, retrofitting

346
00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:31,680
Speaker 1: every single building in the country within ten years, decarbonizing

347
00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:34,480
Speaker 1: the economy within ten years, which even the most committed

348
00:23:34,840 --> 00:23:37,800
Speaker 1: experts in this field says is really not plausible. That

349
00:23:37,840 --> 00:23:39,879
Speaker 1: there's not enough people in the workforce to do some

350
00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:44,320
Speaker 1: of these things. I mean, do you think, um, do

351
00:23:44,359 --> 00:23:47,919
Speaker 1: you think it is potentially counterproductive or better to have

352
00:23:48,040 --> 00:23:51,480
Speaker 1: a more urgent goal. I don't know. I think it's

353
00:23:51,520 --> 00:23:55,920
Speaker 1: really important to have an urgent goal. But the broader

354
00:23:56,520 --> 00:24:01,680
Speaker 1: perspective that people have focused on, you know, carbon reality,

355
00:24:01,960 --> 00:24:05,080
Speaker 1: I think that's clearly attainable, but that isn't the green

356
00:24:05,160 --> 00:24:07,040
Speaker 1: you did agree you do something much more aggressive. I

357
00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:08,879
Speaker 1: guess the question is do you do you make it

358
00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:12,680
Speaker 1: harder to reach the reasonable goal by by trying too

359
00:24:12,680 --> 00:24:16,280
Speaker 1: hard and actually maybe imposing too aggressive to changes on people.

360
00:24:17,720 --> 00:24:21,840
Speaker 1: I think that what we need is a kind of

361
00:24:21,880 --> 00:24:27,440
Speaker 1: wartime mobilization, and we need to do what we can.

362
00:24:28,560 --> 00:24:31,280
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, some of the things that people

363
00:24:31,280 --> 00:24:37,760
Speaker 1: say are very difficult aren't really that difficult. Putting installation

364
00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:42,359
Speaker 1: in housing, this is not require high skilled labor. We

365
00:24:42,400 --> 00:24:46,639
Speaker 1: have a lot of unskilled labor unemployment. We could brain

366
00:24:46,720 --> 00:24:52,000
Speaker 1: people to do it. Uh. So to me, addressing these

367
00:24:52,040 --> 00:24:56,720
Speaker 1: issues would actually make our economy stronger if everybody were

368
00:24:56,720 --> 00:25:00,800
Speaker 1: aware of the issue, if we commit ourselves to having

369
00:25:00,840 --> 00:25:04,119
Speaker 1: finance to enable people to do the expulation that they

370
00:25:04,160 --> 00:25:08,199
Speaker 1: need with actually would more than pay for itself, So

371
00:25:08,240 --> 00:25:11,000
Speaker 1: they would actually be better off if they can get

372
00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:15,200
Speaker 1: the finance to do it. Um. I think we would

373
00:25:15,240 --> 00:25:19,360
Speaker 1: have a very hard take up, right. So, whether it's

374
00:25:19,359 --> 00:25:25,359
Speaker 1: going to be or even the real issue here is

375
00:25:25,840 --> 00:25:31,239
Speaker 1: very quickly changing norms and expectations. And uh, you know,

376
00:25:31,400 --> 00:25:36,080
Speaker 1: we've been dawdling since we became aware of the problem

377
00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:40,199
Speaker 1: more than thirty years ago, and what the Great New

378
00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:43,160
Speaker 1: Deal is really a statement, let's stop dawdling, let's start

379
00:25:43,200 --> 00:25:45,960
Speaker 1: doing something. Do you think, looking at where we are,

380
00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:51,880
Speaker 1: looking at where policies are, that the next recession will

381
00:25:51,880 --> 00:25:55,040
Speaker 1: be another will produce another major crisis the way we've

382
00:25:55,040 --> 00:25:58,040
Speaker 1: seen we saw in two thousand and eight, Or do

383
00:25:58,119 --> 00:25:59,800
Speaker 1: you look at that and say, no, this will be

384
00:26:00,040 --> 00:26:02,160
Speaker 1: you like a more normal recession, but we will continue

385
00:26:02,160 --> 00:26:05,320
Speaker 1: to have all the problems. Yeah, it will be. My

386
00:26:05,880 --> 00:26:08,240
Speaker 1: best bet is that it would be more like a

387
00:26:08,240 --> 00:26:12,480
Speaker 1: more normal reception, but coming on top of a situation

388
00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:17,439
Speaker 1: where we haven't fully recovered from the last major doctor.

389
00:26:18,000 --> 00:26:20,840
Speaker 1: So that means that it will be in some sense

390
00:26:21,640 --> 00:26:25,080
Speaker 1: ugly harder for a lot of the people at the bottom.

391
00:26:25,240 --> 00:26:30,640
Speaker 1: And because interest rates are already very low, monetary policy

392
00:26:30,680 --> 00:26:35,479
Speaker 1: will be hard to respond. And because the US, for instance,

393
00:26:35,560 --> 00:26:42,080
Speaker 1: squandered UH fiscal policy, not using UH using it when

394
00:26:42,080 --> 00:26:44,760
Speaker 1: we needed it in two thousand and ten, but using

395
00:26:44,760 --> 00:26:47,560
Speaker 1: it when we didn't need it in two thousand seventeen,

396
00:26:48,680 --> 00:26:52,840
Speaker 1: we will be in a much harder position respond effectively.

397
00:26:53,640 --> 00:27:01,280
Speaker 1: Thank you, thank you, thanks listening to Stephanomics. Will be

398
00:27:01,320 --> 00:27:04,560
Speaker 1: back next year. With a special roundtable discussion on what

399
00:27:04,680 --> 00:27:08,280
Speaker 1: to expect from the global economy in in the meantime.

400
00:27:08,320 --> 00:27:11,359
Speaker 1: You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal website at

401
00:27:11,560 --> 00:27:14,160
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts, and we would love

402
00:27:14,200 --> 00:27:16,200
Speaker 1: it if you took the time to rate and review

403
00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:20,040
Speaker 1: our show. For more news and analysis from Bloomberg Economics,

404
00:27:20,080 --> 00:27:23,280
Speaker 1: follow at Economics on Twitter, and you can also find

405
00:27:23,320 --> 00:27:27,280
Speaker 1: me on at my Stephanomics. The story in this episode

406
00:27:27,359 --> 00:27:30,800
Speaker 1: was written and reported by Michelle jam Rusco and Uya Naguyan,

407
00:27:31,240 --> 00:27:34,680
Speaker 1: with assistance from Kevin Varley. It was produced by Magnus

408
00:27:34,720 --> 00:27:37,960
Speaker 1: Hendrickson and edited by Scott Lamman, who is also the

409
00:27:38,000 --> 00:27:42,720
Speaker 1: executive producer of Stephanomics Special thanks to Joe Stiglett's Nazarene

410
00:27:42,800 --> 00:27:47,040
Speaker 1: Syria and hung True On the head of Bloomberg Podcasts

411
00:27:47,200 --> 00:28:00,680
Speaker 1: is Francesco Levy five