WEBVTT - FINAL NFL WEEK 1 Bets: Gambling Picks & Predictions 

0:00:00.830 --> 0:00:04.850
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square, presented by Pilot Market. We are

0:00:04.870 --> 0:00:07.510
<v Speaker 1>part of the Volume Podcast Network. This is the show

0:00:07.550 --> 0:00:09.629
<v Speaker 1>that makes the squares sharper and makes the wise guys

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>pay attention. I am Chad Millman. I am joined, as always,

0:00:14.220 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>by my co-host, my BFF, my companion, my compadre, professional bettor,

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:20.780
<v Speaker 1>Simon Hunter.

0:00:21.060 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Simon.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:24.140
<v Speaker 3>Chad, how we doing?

0:00:24.700 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Brother, we got a Sunday morning NFL Week 1 show.

0:00:28.140 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You and I are going to nail down our five

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>final official picks for the first week of the NFL season.

0:00:35.740 --> 0:00:37.629
<v Speaker 1>I know people have been asking a lot about the contest.

0:00:38.690 --> 0:00:41.489
<v Speaker 1>There have been so many legal and logistics issues with

0:00:41.510 --> 0:00:45.910
<v Speaker 1>the contest that we haven't confronted before. The contest will

0:00:45.930 --> 0:00:48.790
<v Speaker 1>be happening. I apologize that we didn't get it done

0:00:48.830 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>for week one. It will launch for week two. So

0:00:51.229 --> 0:00:56.980
<v Speaker 1>consider these our final five picks that we love at

0:00:57.020 --> 0:00:57.580
<v Speaker 1>this moment.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.620
<v Speaker 2>With these lines. Simon, are you ready to roll?

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:02.370
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:03.139
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:01:03.780 --> 0:01:06.820
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay at Cincinnati. The Bucs are three and a

0:01:06.860 --> 0:01:10.510
<v Speaker 1>half point underdogs. This one was Chad's choice. I'm a

0:01:10.530 --> 0:01:11.790
<v Speaker 1>little concerned about this, Simon.

0:01:11.830 --> 0:01:14.069
<v Speaker 2>You love it. I love it. But all of a sudden,

0:01:14.090 --> 0:01:15.350
<v Speaker 2>this number is moving to four.

0:01:15.630 --> 0:01:19.970
<v Speaker 1>And it's been moving this direction all week, stubbornly hanging

0:01:20.010 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>on to three and a half. I've started to see

0:01:22.390 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>some fours pop up this morning, Sunday morning. You listed

0:01:26.580 --> 0:01:29.220
<v Speaker 1>it as one of your biggest bets. It's a dog

0:01:29.530 --> 0:01:33.150
<v Speaker 1>with a hook, an O-line we love, a QB we

0:01:33.190 --> 0:01:36.429
<v Speaker 1>love as a dog, and he's got his full complement

0:01:36.470 --> 0:01:38.530
<v Speaker 1>of weapons because it's week one and nobody's hurt.

0:01:39.870 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 2>What are we missing? Are we getting trapped? Are we

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 2>being blind? Do we still love this?

0:01:47.740 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's too late to get off the boat at

0:01:49.780 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 3>this point, my friend. We're in the middle of the Atlantic.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:53.690
<v Speaker 3>We are all in. Yeah.

0:01:54.700 --> 0:01:56.690
<v Speaker 4>So, yeah, I just look at it that I agree

0:01:56.700 --> 0:01:58.010
<v Speaker 4>with you. A weak one are always going to be

0:01:58.090 --> 0:02:00.110
<v Speaker 4>scuffed because we always see the worst case scenario, right?

0:02:00.170 --> 0:02:05.370
<v Speaker 4>Joe Burrow throws for 350 against a bad secondary of Tampa,

0:02:05.490 --> 0:02:06.710
<v Speaker 4>and we just get absolutely torched.

0:02:07.330 --> 0:02:09.620
<v Speaker 3>But, you know, me and you talked about it.

0:02:10.180 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 4>The Bucs have always been good to us when Baker

0:02:12.660 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 4>is healthy and has his full complement in offensive weapons. Now,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 4>we don't know how they're going to be without Mike Evans, right?

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:19.859
<v Speaker 4>No Mike Evans, to me, is the bigger thing we

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.500
<v Speaker 4>haven't really talked much about. But you've seen when he's

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.460
<v Speaker 4>been injured, Baker's always used these other guys and made

0:02:25.500 --> 0:02:28.019
<v Speaker 4>them stand out. So it's kind of going to be

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 4>an interesting test there. And, yeah, it really is just

0:02:31.980 --> 0:02:34.620
<v Speaker 4>a fade on the numbers. We do respect this Bengals

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 4>team and Joe Byrne, how good they are, but I

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.340
<v Speaker 4>just can't see the Bucs being that much worse of

0:02:39.370 --> 0:02:41.310
<v Speaker 4>a team, honestly, as fully healthy as they.

0:02:41.270 --> 0:02:44.230
<v Speaker 3>Are right now. So I'm excited for Reuben Bain as.

0:02:44.190 --> 0:02:47.790
<v Speaker 4>Well, see that matchup against that offensive line for Cincy

0:02:47.810 --> 0:02:50.150
<v Speaker 4>because we've talked, I think they're better than people give

0:02:50.169 --> 0:02:52.630
<v Speaker 4>them respect to be. But this would be a great

0:02:52.669 --> 0:02:54.850
<v Speaker 4>test for them. Like to say, good front Vita Bay

0:02:54.910 --> 0:02:58.250
<v Speaker 4>is full go as well. So, yeah, we're going to

0:02:58.270 --> 0:03:01.030
<v Speaker 4>get a heavy dosage of Joe Burrow. And, you know,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.700
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be their plan, obviously, in this matchup tonight. So, yeah,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 4>go to four. Like I've talked about, I know pros

0:03:07.980 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 4>who have bet this. They're not taking the number. They're

0:03:09.780 --> 0:03:11.220
<v Speaker 4>really betting the money line. So, to me, that's why

0:03:11.260 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 4>it's going up a little bit. Because people, especially the public,

0:03:14.180 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be doing money line bets as well. So,

0:03:15.660 --> 0:03:17.370
<v Speaker 4>they're just throwing these in their parlays at this point.

0:03:17.380 --> 0:03:19.810
<v Speaker 4>I think everyone has the same mentality.

0:03:19.830 --> 0:03:21.810
<v Speaker 3>We all think. Joe will win, but it won't be

0:03:21.850 --> 0:03:23.270
<v Speaker 3>by more than three. Right.

0:03:23.690 --> 0:03:25.870
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Really quickly.

0:03:25.930 --> 0:03:28.450
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about two favorites or two of

0:03:28.470 --> 0:03:30.770
<v Speaker 1>the games. Probably not going to make it, but they

0:03:30.790 --> 0:03:32.290
<v Speaker 1>were on the conversation the whole week. So I just

0:03:32.330 --> 0:03:35.050
<v Speaker 1>want to close the loop on them. Cleveland at Jacksonville.

0:03:35.610 --> 0:03:37.350
<v Speaker 1>This line got down to seven and a half in

0:03:37.370 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the week. It's now at plus nine

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.020
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland plus nine in a lot of places. You've been

0:03:45.060 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Browns since Tuesday and, I will defer

0:03:49.260 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to you. I don't think the Browns plus nine ends

0:03:52.660 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>up being one of our final five. But tell me

0:03:56.490 --> 0:03:59.770
<v Speaker 1>if you're feeling so strong about the Browns at plus

0:03:59.810 --> 0:04:01.490
<v Speaker 1>nine right now.

0:04:03.330 --> 0:04:06.570
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I can't believe your discord, which will no doubt

0:04:06.590 --> 0:04:09.990
<v Speaker 4>be used against you at some day in court, came through,

0:04:10.010 --> 0:04:12.610
<v Speaker 4>not taking the jacks, took Pittsburgh's money line and that

0:04:12.630 --> 0:04:12.870
<v Speaker 4>paid off.

0:04:12.890 --> 0:04:16.180
<v Speaker 2>Four votes, only four votes out of nearly 150.

0:04:16.180 --> 0:04:19.669
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think Pittsburgh went from minus 180 to

0:04:20.190 --> 0:04:20.830
<v Speaker 4>it's like minus.

0:04:21.130 --> 0:04:22.930
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about that in a sec. Let's

0:04:22.990 --> 0:04:24.570
<v Speaker 1>let's finish with this game.

0:04:25.450 --> 0:04:29.090
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, nothing's changed. I get why everyone's on the Jaguars. Strong.

0:04:29.110 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 3>What's going to be a train wreck? It could be terrible.

0:04:31.700 --> 0:04:33.580
<v Speaker 4>I've just given out all the stats. I mean, one

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.420
<v Speaker 4>of my favorite ones, too, especially now that it's moved.

0:04:36.020 --> 0:04:40.700
<v Speaker 4>So underdogs of a plus points in week one. 26-9

0:04:40.740 --> 0:04:42.820
<v Speaker 4>against the spread. So that would be the Browns and

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 4>the Cardinals.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.659
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. It's just a week one play.

0:04:45.779 --> 0:04:48.980
<v Speaker 4>You just play these ugly dogs because it's always so sloppy.

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.180
<v Speaker 4>Could the Browns be blown out? Could the Cardinals get

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 4>blown out? Yeah, we all agree they're bottom of the

0:04:53.940 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 4>barrel teams, but it's just so stupid week one. So

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.050
<v Speaker 4>to me, it's a Jaguars team that keeps getting the

0:05:00.130 --> 0:05:01.410
<v Speaker 4>love and hype from last year.

0:05:01.589 --> 0:05:03.130
<v Speaker 3>People just love that team.

0:05:03.170 --> 0:05:04.850
<v Speaker 4>They were so good to close out the year, and

0:05:05.270 --> 0:05:06.830
<v Speaker 4>you expect them to come out and just beat up

0:05:06.850 --> 0:05:10.300
<v Speaker 4>a Browns team that historically does not travel well. I

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.060
<v Speaker 4>think I saw some really stupid stat. It was a

0:05:12.100 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Watson stack. Cause he obviously played for the Texans and

0:05:14.500 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 4>it was like in his career, he's five and one

0:05:16.620 --> 0:05:19.500
<v Speaker 4>against the Jaguars. It's like, that's a different person. That

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.350
<v Speaker 4>is not Sean Watson in any form. So I love

0:05:23.370 --> 0:05:25.089
<v Speaker 4>that people were asking me about that stat. It's like,

0:05:25.210 --> 0:05:27.690
<v Speaker 4>I wish that mattered. I love stupid stats like that.

0:05:27.890 --> 0:05:29.110
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

0:05:29.150 --> 0:05:32.190
<v Speaker 4>To me, it's, it's, it's, it could be the one,

0:05:32.210 --> 0:05:34.950
<v Speaker 4>the game that ruins people's survivor bracket, right? That would

0:05:34.990 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 4>be the shocker of the day. If the Browns could

0:05:36.500 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 4>win outright. That's why I just want to stay away.

0:05:38.820 --> 0:05:40.820
<v Speaker 4>That it's a little, Little fishy, too much love for

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.740
<v Speaker 4>the public. So I'm on this number. Keep getting bigger.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.180
<v Speaker 4>I would love for it to get double digits because

0:05:46.220 --> 0:05:48.990
<v Speaker 4>the stats you get even better for double digit dogs

0:05:49.230 --> 0:05:49.890
<v Speaker 4>in week one.

0:05:49.950 --> 0:05:52.610
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, let the public keep bending up this morning.

0:05:53.250 --> 0:05:55.870
<v Speaker 2>Are you taking a little taste of the money line?

0:05:57.589 --> 0:05:58.810
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I already have.

0:05:59.250 --> 0:06:01.610
<v Speaker 4>If you're doing any stupid little money line around Robin

0:06:01.630 --> 0:06:04.930
<v Speaker 4>Parlay or anything like that, just throw one or two

0:06:04.990 --> 0:06:06.940
<v Speaker 4>of the Browns into one of them. Because like we said,

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.020
<v Speaker 4>It's just so much unknown what their defense is going

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:10.460
<v Speaker 4>to be like and what their offense will be like.

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 4>I'll pay for the upside because I respect how good

0:06:13.540 --> 0:06:14.700
<v Speaker 4>they've drafted the last two years.

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.770
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Pittsburgh a second ago, and I just want

0:06:18.790 --> 0:06:21.529
<v Speaker 1>to close the loop on this one as well. This

0:06:21.550 --> 0:06:23.950
<v Speaker 1>was a huge move on Thursday with the announcement that

0:06:24.010 --> 0:06:25.929
<v Speaker 1>Tua was going to be out with an oblique issue.

0:06:26.270 --> 0:06:29.070
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Rush is now going to be starting. The line

0:06:29.130 --> 0:06:29.910
<v Speaker 1>moved from 3.5 to 4.5, 5.5.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It's now at 6.5.

0:06:30.310 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Someone had asked in the Discord– what our survivor pick was.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>We chose the Steelers in survivor, and that was earlier

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.380
<v Speaker 1>in the week. Our grouper bet of the week from

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.740
<v Speaker 1>the Discord voted on people in the Discord was Steelers

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at minus 178. We got that on the money line,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.380
<v Speaker 1>a great number before the news. Steelers are now minus

0:06:58.380 --> 0:06:59.750
<v Speaker 1>300 on the money line.

0:07:00.310 --> 0:07:03.830
<v Speaker 2>Remember, if you want to join the Discord, go to readthenumber.com.

0:07:06.250 --> 0:07:10.660
<v Speaker 1>Readthenumber.com. Pre-order the book, my book, The Number. Get an

0:07:10.700 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>invite to the Discord. The more books we sell now,

0:07:13.340 --> 0:07:14.340
<v Speaker 1>the more we are giving to St.

0:07:14.380 --> 0:07:17.929
<v Speaker 2>Jude's Hospital. Go to readthenumber.com.

0:07:21.010 --> 0:07:23.730
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh was a team that we liked as a favorite,

0:07:24.050 --> 0:07:25.770
<v Speaker 1>potentially to be in our final five.

0:07:26.430 --> 0:07:28.900
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, at this number, it's going to be a pass

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:29.170
<v Speaker 2>for us.

0:07:30.630 --> 0:07:32.350
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's going to be tough to program a real

0:07:32.390 --> 0:07:33.930
<v Speaker 4>choice in their contest because it's going to be minus

0:07:33.970 --> 0:07:35.790
<v Speaker 4>three and a half in a lot of those contests.

0:07:36.090 --> 0:07:36.630
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:07:36.750 --> 0:07:39.130
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be the most public side probably of

0:07:39.190 --> 0:07:42.190
<v Speaker 4>the week game-wise because it's a third-string quarterback going against

0:07:42.300 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 4>a highly paid and rated defense at home. So, yeah,

0:07:48.820 --> 0:07:51.580
<v Speaker 4>am I terrified? I'd much rather have been Tua. Tua,

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I knew exactly what we were going to get. I

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.620
<v Speaker 4>expected him to be knocked out within the second or

0:07:55.660 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 4>third quarter because of this problem. Cooper Rush now is

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 4>having his own back spasms. um, you know, I don't

0:08:02.780 --> 0:08:05.119
<v Speaker 4>know what kind of bed mattresses they're using or chairs

0:08:05.140 --> 0:08:07.900
<v Speaker 4>they're using over at that facilities, but if the owner's

0:08:07.940 --> 0:08:10.690
<v Speaker 4>a billionaire got to update whatever that is, because having

0:08:10.730 --> 0:08:13.489
<v Speaker 4>both quarterbacks have back spasms, very interesting.

0:08:13.610 --> 0:08:16.030
<v Speaker 3>So, um, yeah, we're in.

0:08:16.130 --> 0:08:18.070
<v Speaker 4>I'm dug in, I'm dug in on Pittsburgh's when I've

0:08:18.110 --> 0:08:20.770
<v Speaker 4>been bending for three months, I'd never knew this was

0:08:20.790 --> 0:08:21.750
<v Speaker 4>gonna be the most public side.

0:08:21.770 --> 0:08:24.010
<v Speaker 3>I always thought it was kind of, uh, there's people

0:08:24.030 --> 0:08:24.950
<v Speaker 3>out there that love Atlanta.

0:08:24.970 --> 0:08:26.230
<v Speaker 4>So I was like, people are always gonna be back

0:08:26.270 --> 0:08:28.150
<v Speaker 4>in that team, especially in this matchup.

0:08:28.810 --> 0:08:29.930
<v Speaker 3>Um, this is insane.

0:08:30.010 --> 0:08:31.410
<v Speaker 4>If you want to, If you want to know what

0:08:31.490 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 4>side to blindly take at a number, that probably is

0:08:34.140 --> 0:08:35.540
<v Speaker 4>going to work out for you. Plus six and a

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 4>half on Atlanta, that's a huge number. At this point,

0:08:40.620 --> 0:08:42.500
<v Speaker 4>you can't put money on Pittsburgh unless you're putting a

0:08:42.540 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 4>teaser or taking their money line still. I would not

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:47.990
<v Speaker 4>recommend taking minus six and a half on this team

0:08:48.030 --> 0:08:50.970
<v Speaker 4>just because it's, once again, such a fluky week one,

0:08:51.030 --> 0:08:53.470
<v Speaker 4>and Porter's not playing as well. So now Drake London's

0:08:53.510 --> 0:08:57.790
<v Speaker 4>going up against their number two corner. Cooper Rush is

0:08:57.809 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 4>not putting fear at all into anybody, but you just saw–

0:09:01.330 --> 0:09:04.089
<v Speaker 4>on Thursday night, a backup quarterback come in and win

0:09:04.130 --> 0:09:07.230
<v Speaker 4>a game. All it takes is them to get hot

0:09:07.250 --> 0:09:11.310
<v Speaker 4>and their team to panic or have a bad game.

0:09:11.670 --> 0:09:14.750
<v Speaker 4>We're dug in here, Chad, but it being the most

0:09:14.820 --> 0:09:18.220
<v Speaker 4>bedside and everything like that money-wise is a little alarming.

0:09:19.580 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We're doing a new segment, Simon, and we're going to

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.660
<v Speaker 1>talk about it with the Houston Texans hosting the Buffalo Bills.

0:09:26.380 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 2>It's our closing.

0:09:27.970 --> 0:09:35.380
<v Speaker 1>Time trade of the week. presented by Polymarket. Look, we've

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>been talking about Houston a little bit more in every episode.

0:09:41.140 --> 0:09:45.730
<v Speaker 1>It's at one and a half as a trade on Polymarket,

0:09:47.230 --> 0:09:53.310
<v Speaker 1>but it's creeping. You can see people coming in on Houston.

0:09:54.270 --> 0:09:58.750
<v Speaker 1>The Texans as dogs were one of the games that

0:09:58.770 --> 0:10:03.130
<v Speaker 1>the Wise Guys emphasized in sharp calls compelled you to

0:10:03.190 --> 0:10:05.819
<v Speaker 1>make them one of your bigger bets. I have now

0:10:05.890 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>invested in Texans at plus one and a half Texans.

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:12.300
<v Speaker 2>On the money line.

0:10:13.700 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>We included them in the money line underdog parlay with

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.979
<v Speaker 1>the Giants and Closing time trade of the week presented

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>by Polymarket.

0:10:21.780 --> 0:10:23.660
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how we ignore this one.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.980
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a true pros versus Joes.

0:10:28.059 --> 0:10:30.709
<v Speaker 4>It's every pro group I talk to, every pro guy

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.470
<v Speaker 4>I talk to as a single bettor is like, how

0:10:33.490 --> 0:10:35.569
<v Speaker 4>do you not take Houston here? And on the flip side,

0:10:35.590 --> 0:10:37.750
<v Speaker 4>it feels like everyone I talk to is like, well,

0:10:37.770 --> 0:10:40.550
<v Speaker 4>you're getting, you know, one of the best quarterbacks in

0:10:40.610 --> 0:10:43.510
<v Speaker 4>football under a field goal. You take him here. He

0:10:43.570 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 4>finds ways to win these type of games. So it

0:10:46.620 --> 0:10:48.179
<v Speaker 4>is a little scary too. I've seen, it feels like

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:53.550
<v Speaker 4>anytime I'm in the, the books or wherever, you're seeing

0:10:53.580 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of love for this Texans team because of

0:10:55.790 --> 0:10:56.670
<v Speaker 4>what we just talked about.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:01.179
<v Speaker 3>Everyone just knows this defense is a unit. Yeah, so.

0:11:02.700 --> 0:11:07.300
<v Speaker 4>If he does win this game, credit will start this

0:11:07.340 --> 0:11:09.700
<v Speaker 4>season for Josh Allen because this is a true test

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 4>with a rookie head coach on the road here. I mean,

0:11:12.500 --> 0:11:14.219
<v Speaker 4>that's another part of it we haven't even talked about

0:11:14.300 --> 0:11:16.540
<v Speaker 4>that much where it's such a big deal for a

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 4>first-time head coach, and a D.C. 's first time calling

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 4>defense for the Bills, a whole new defensive unit on

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 4>the road here. We know the question here, Chad. Can

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Stroud get us to 20 points or 21 points? It

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.540
<v Speaker 4>feels like that's what's going to win this game. Either

0:11:32.590 --> 0:11:37.449
<v Speaker 4>team can get to 20 or 21. We'll trade this number.

0:11:38.210 --> 0:11:40.550
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully you get it before it drops down because I

0:11:40.570 --> 0:11:41.829
<v Speaker 4>agree with you. I think it's going to get back

0:11:41.870 --> 0:11:43.750
<v Speaker 4>down to half a point or maybe flip by the

0:11:43.790 --> 0:11:44.650
<v Speaker 4>time the game kicks off.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.059
<v Speaker 1>Football is back, folks, and you need to change the

0:11:48.100 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>way you invest in the NFL this season. It's finally

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.780
<v Speaker 1>time to ditch your old sportsbook apps because Polymarket is here.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Polymarket is a legal prediction market now available in all

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.239
<v Speaker 1>50 states. And those old sportsbooks, they're a relic of

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.290
<v Speaker 1>the past. On Polymarket, you can trade on all things NFL,

0:12:04.750 --> 0:12:06.710
<v Speaker 1>from the Sunday slate to who wins Rookie of the

0:12:06.730 --> 0:12:09.470
<v Speaker 1>Year to who performs the halftime show. We hear from

0:12:09.510 --> 0:12:12.950
<v Speaker 1>listeners all the time about sportsbooks driving them crazy, trying

0:12:12.970 --> 0:12:15.510
<v Speaker 1>to cash out live. They can block you as often

0:12:15.570 --> 0:12:19.090
<v Speaker 1>as they want, holding your money hostage. Polymarket gives you

0:12:19.130 --> 0:12:22.610
<v Speaker 1>the freedom to cash out instantly if the momentum swings.

0:12:23.030 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You sell off it in real time. You are in control.

0:12:26.170 --> 0:12:27.940
<v Speaker 1>No one can lock you out. And you can also

0:12:28.420 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>buy in any time. So when the market dips, like

0:12:32.740 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if a team starts slow and drops to, say, 40%,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not a loss. That's when you buy in at Polymarket.

0:12:40.580 --> 0:12:43.380
<v Speaker 1>You can buy cheap and ride the momentum back up.

0:12:43.929 --> 0:12:46.890
<v Speaker 1>Polymarket is so confident you'll never go back.

0:12:46.710 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 2>To the old way. They're issuing a challenge. They're giving

0:12:50.700 --> 0:12:53.179
<v Speaker 2>you a $ 50.

0:12:51.660 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Bonus when you deposit just $ 10. Sign up right now

0:12:54.880 --> 0:13:00.870
<v Speaker 1>with promo code STARP. That's polymarket.us and promo code SHARP

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:08.410
<v Speaker 1>to get a $ 50 bonus when you deposit just $ 10.

0:13:07.490 --> 0:13:11.630
<v Speaker 1>Chicago at Carolina. Carolina is now.

0:13:11.390 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>A full field goal. dog at home. It had been

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:16.820
<v Speaker 2>at two and a half.

0:13:16.860 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>The public is finally starting to move this up a

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit, which is what we expected.

0:13:23.300 --> 0:13:24.730
<v Speaker 2>This was Simon Says.

0:13:24.750 --> 0:13:27.650
<v Speaker 1>It's also on the list of one of the bigger

0:13:27.690 --> 0:13:32.210
<v Speaker 1>bets of the week. Reminder, Bryce Young, past two seasons,

0:13:32.230 --> 0:13:39.410
<v Speaker 1>17-9 as an underdog, 11 outright wins. The Bears defense,

0:13:39.650 --> 0:13:43.900
<v Speaker 1>on paper at least, truly suspect. Carolina's defense might not

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>be any better. But, humid day in Charlotte. Scoreboard could

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.420
<v Speaker 1>light up. We still like Bryce in that spot. Nothing

0:13:52.470 --> 0:13:54.010
<v Speaker 1>has made me feel like we have to walk away

0:13:54.030 --> 0:13:54.330
<v Speaker 1>from this.

0:13:56.610 --> 0:13:59.410
<v Speaker 4>No, it's going to be nice though for the Bears.

0:13:59.429 --> 0:14:01.610
<v Speaker 4>It's a true test of what their defense could be.

0:14:01.630 --> 0:14:04.630
<v Speaker 4>Because we've seen Bryce Young, he struggles against good defenses,

0:14:04.650 --> 0:14:06.590
<v Speaker 4>but he tears up bad defenses. I mean, I wish

0:14:06.610 --> 0:14:08.730
<v Speaker 4>he didn't say bad, right? He tore up the Rams

0:14:08.809 --> 0:14:10.270
<v Speaker 4>defense last year in the playoffs. I don't want to

0:14:10.290 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 4>put too much disrespect to Bryce Young, but But, yeah,

0:14:14.820 --> 0:14:16.410
<v Speaker 4>I knew coming in it was probably going to be

0:14:16.429 --> 0:14:18.230
<v Speaker 4>on the bigger public side, the Bears, because they were

0:14:18.270 --> 0:14:19.350
<v Speaker 4>just such a.

0:14:19.350 --> 0:14:20.010
<v Speaker 3>Good team last year.

0:14:20.030 --> 0:14:21.770
<v Speaker 4>And they're such a fun team to root for, especially

0:14:21.810 --> 0:14:24.670
<v Speaker 4>Ben Johnson, the head coach. He's just an offensive genius

0:14:24.690 --> 0:14:28.580
<v Speaker 4>of mine. So, Polymerica was one of the first places

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.100
<v Speaker 4>to go to three and a half. So, it's another

0:14:30.180 --> 0:14:33.900
<v Speaker 4>place I've been betting a ton of money into or

0:14:33.940 --> 0:14:36.500
<v Speaker 4>trading a lot of money into. And I just, I

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 4>look at this number now and it's like, okay. I

0:14:39.580 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 4>thought every everywhere would be three and a half and

0:14:41.450 --> 0:14:43.510
<v Speaker 4>it's still not there. Like you said, it's still holding

0:14:43.550 --> 0:14:46.710
<v Speaker 4>at three, which is really books. Books aren't here to push.

0:14:46.970 --> 0:14:49.010
<v Speaker 4>So I always say to people, it's like, you know,

0:14:49.030 --> 0:14:51.510
<v Speaker 4>worst case scenario lands on the three. That's usually how

0:14:51.530 --> 0:14:53.590
<v Speaker 4>the books look at it because they just have so

0:14:53.630 --> 0:14:54.630
<v Speaker 4>many people at two and a half.

0:14:54.650 --> 0:14:58.340
<v Speaker 3>So money line bets. So, um, yeah, not surprising.

0:14:58.380 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 4>This is probably gonna be the one or two most

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 4>bedside and most books, uh, today and most traded sides

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 4>to it on most markets. So, um, I'm of the

0:15:08.260 --> 0:15:10.980
<v Speaker 4>standpoint here of just matchup wise. I think Bryce will

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 4>always keep us in it. Even, even when he gets down,

0:15:13.580 --> 0:15:16.570
<v Speaker 4>he's done offensive weapons right now. The Carolina team's healthy

0:15:16.620 --> 0:15:19.990
<v Speaker 4>enough to make this a real game. And flip side,

0:15:20.790 --> 0:15:24.050
<v Speaker 4>we'll see what Ben Johnson wants to do, but I

0:15:24.110 --> 0:15:26.170
<v Speaker 4>expect they're going to run for 150 yards. Like the

0:15:26.230 --> 0:15:27.750
<v Speaker 4>matchup wise bears are going to be able to get

0:15:27.810 --> 0:15:30.590
<v Speaker 4>theirs up front with their offensive unit there. I mean,

0:15:30.610 --> 0:15:33.850
<v Speaker 4>their strength is that O-line. So we will see what

0:15:33.890 --> 0:15:37.130
<v Speaker 4>happens this matchup here, but, Yeah, just a line that

0:15:37.150 --> 0:15:39.770
<v Speaker 4>probably should closer to two, maybe two and a half.

0:15:39.830 --> 0:15:42.890
<v Speaker 4>The fact that it's three, three and a half, it's

0:15:42.930 --> 0:15:44.300
<v Speaker 4>way too much value on Chicago.

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's trading about 55 cents at the three

0:15:46.980 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half on Polymarket right now. Our brass balls

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.140
<v Speaker 1>trade of the week presented by Polymarket this week was

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:02.860
<v Speaker 1>Miami at Las Vegas, three and a half. That's currently

0:16:02.900 --> 0:16:07.430
<v Speaker 1>trading at 54 cents. So it's more expensive to buy

0:16:07.450 --> 0:16:10.580
<v Speaker 1>the Miami side. I think we're going to have to

0:16:10.620 --> 0:16:12.580
<v Speaker 1>make a tough choice on this one. I'm curious about

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>where your.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Head is at.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.820
<v Speaker 1>My sense is that we have three we are locked

0:16:16.900 --> 0:16:20.540
<v Speaker 1>in on, potentially four. I wonder if at the end

0:16:20.580 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Miami at three and a half is

0:16:22.540 --> 0:16:26.130
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the outside looking in.

0:16:26.620 --> 0:16:27.430
<v Speaker 2>I'm still invested.

0:16:27.450 --> 0:16:32.070
<v Speaker 1>I actually bet Miami on the money line here, but

0:16:32.090 --> 0:16:33.790
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure we're going to get Miami at three

0:16:33.830 --> 0:16:36.050
<v Speaker 1>and a half as one of our final five. I

0:16:36.070 --> 0:16:38.650
<v Speaker 1>think both you and I feel more strongly about some

0:16:38.690 --> 0:16:41.430
<v Speaker 1>other ones, but maybe I'm misinterpreting, misreading.

0:16:41.850 --> 0:16:42.250
<v Speaker 2>Your thoughts?

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but this is your side. You're all in on this.

0:16:46.060 --> 0:16:47.860
<v Speaker 3>You wanted this to be brass balls, and now you

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>seem a little lukewarm on it. What's going on? Are

0:16:49.860 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 3>you getting a little cold feet on Miami here?

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.180
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, no.

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.470
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting cold feet on Miami, but let's bunch

0:16:57.530 --> 0:16:59.070
<v Speaker 1>it in with some other games.

0:16:59.550 --> 0:17:01.510
<v Speaker 4>I put this one on you because I honestly have

0:17:01.570 --> 0:17:03.070
<v Speaker 4>no interest in heavily watching this one.

0:17:03.090 --> 0:17:04.230
<v Speaker 3>If you want to make this one of our five,

0:17:04.290 --> 0:17:04.770
<v Speaker 3>so be it.

0:17:05.390 --> 0:17:08.230
<v Speaker 1>Oh, well then that's like, I, I, I actually, to

0:17:09.020 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I feel that I've always felt better about

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay.

0:17:13.260 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I've always felt better about Chicago, about Carolina.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I feel much better about Houston right now than I

0:17:20.420 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>do about Miami. And so there are a couple other

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>games that I think are worth talking about and we

0:17:25.580 --> 0:17:30.300
<v Speaker 1>can sort of bunch them together. Like Minnesota, there are

0:17:30.340 --> 0:17:33.060
<v Speaker 1>some one and a halves out there against green Bay.

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>They're hosting green Bay. There's a lot of twos and

0:17:35.980 --> 0:17:38.980
<v Speaker 1>there's even some two and a half. So do I

0:17:39.030 --> 0:17:41.590
<v Speaker 1>like Minnesota? If we want to get a favorite in there,

0:17:42.050 --> 0:17:44.030
<v Speaker 1>is this the favorite we're.

0:17:43.850 --> 0:17:44.630
<v Speaker 2>Going to get in?

0:17:44.650 --> 0:17:46.750
<v Speaker 1>And then there's one more game that we got to

0:17:46.810 --> 0:17:48.750
<v Speaker 1>talk about that I think you and I both like

0:17:49.710 --> 0:17:52.660
<v Speaker 1>as the number has moved in our favor, probably more

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 1>than Miami. But let's talk about, let's shelve Miami for

0:17:55.740 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a second. Bunch it with these next two games, Minnesota

0:17:59.660 --> 0:18:01.300
<v Speaker 1>minus one and a half hosting Green Bay.

0:18:03.780 --> 0:18:04.740
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, nothing's changed for me.

0:18:05.300 --> 0:18:06.740
<v Speaker 4>I told you I'm too close to this one, so

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 4>you'd have to decide on it because I really like Minnesota.

0:18:09.300 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 4>I like the matchup, and I think a lot of

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.619
<v Speaker 4>books are in.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Pie market as well.

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.510
<v Speaker 4>They're all moving at two and a half, so it's like, okay,

0:18:17.010 --> 0:18:18.490
<v Speaker 4>the pros are coming in on them. I know the

0:18:18.530 --> 0:18:20.449
<v Speaker 4>public is still going to be betting Green Bay for

0:18:20.470 --> 0:18:23.310
<v Speaker 4>good reason, though, right? Green Bay has proven exactly what

0:18:23.330 --> 0:18:25.830
<v Speaker 4>you're getting from them, but I still don't think the

0:18:25.869 --> 0:18:27.929
<v Speaker 4>general public knows how bad that defense is and how

0:18:27.990 --> 0:18:29.900
<v Speaker 4>bad the offensive line is for Green Bay.

0:18:33.700 --> 0:18:35.220
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I just, was that your cat?

0:18:35.980 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, man. She's just not.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.659
<v Speaker 2>She's a goddamn menace. She is a menace.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 3>She is, man. But yeah, I just, I don't know

0:18:44.740 --> 0:18:46.460
<v Speaker 3>what to do here, brother. I'm too close to it. It's,

0:18:46.859 --> 0:18:48.419
<v Speaker 3>I can see it going wrong in so many different ways.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.889
<v Speaker 4>Cause this Kyler Murray, but this is the moment at

0:18:51.950 --> 0:18:55.850
<v Speaker 4>home here with this team. I mean, under, under two still,

0:18:55.890 --> 0:18:57.230
<v Speaker 4>like you're still getting minus one and a half.

0:18:57.310 --> 0:19:00.090
<v Speaker 3>So I, that's one favorite.

0:19:00.109 --> 0:19:01.390
<v Speaker 4>I like, and we even talked to that, but like

0:19:01.530 --> 0:19:04.410
<v Speaker 4>another favorite I've, I've come around on in the last

0:19:04.450 --> 0:19:05.950
<v Speaker 4>two or three days is the Chiefs.

0:19:06.369 --> 0:19:09.129
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, if you're.

0:19:09.010 --> 0:19:12.610
<v Speaker 4>Talking my two favorites, now that the Eagles are way

0:19:12.630 --> 0:19:15.030
<v Speaker 4>too blown up, way too public, Pittsburgh is way too

0:19:15.050 --> 0:19:18.830
<v Speaker 4>blown up, I've definitely shifted my focus to Minnesota and

0:19:18.850 --> 0:19:20.930
<v Speaker 4>the Chiefs are two favorites here that I like late.

0:19:21.670 --> 0:19:23.219
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the Chiefs on the list, but the

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>last game I do have on the list that I

0:19:24.859 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think we're aligned on, New York Giants currently plus three.

0:19:31.740 --> 0:19:35.659
<v Speaker 1>at home on Sunday night against Dallas. You know, this

0:19:35.700 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>is a game that to me epitomizes one of the

0:19:38.830 --> 0:19:41.950
<v Speaker 1>more fun things about tracking these and having the conversations

0:19:41.990 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about these over the course of multiple shows during the week.

0:19:46.100 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>On Monday, the game was a two and a half.

0:19:48.300 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We're both asking ourselves, is Dallas a trap here? We

0:19:52.540 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>don't love the Giants for the season, but this feels

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.220
<v Speaker 1>like a good spot for them if we can get

0:19:56.270 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to three.

0:19:57.180 --> 0:19:57.790
<v Speaker 2>We're interested.

0:19:57.810 --> 0:20:01.170
<v Speaker 1>On Thursday, we're listening to sharp calls. We're telling ourselves

0:20:01.550 --> 0:20:03.450
<v Speaker 1>this is getting to three. We're going to want to

0:20:03.530 --> 0:20:06.950
<v Speaker 1>play it at three. Now it's at three. at three,

0:20:06.990 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's three and a half at prediction markets trading at

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about 55 cents.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:13.660
<v Speaker 2>I feel really good about the giants.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I feel better about the giants at three, three and

0:20:16.660 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a half than I do about Miami at three and

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.730
<v Speaker 1>a half. And that's my ego is not wrapped up

0:20:21.810 --> 0:20:24.169
<v Speaker 1>in what we decided was brass balls. My ego is

0:20:24.190 --> 0:20:28.090
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in just winning the fucking games. So I

0:20:28.130 --> 0:20:30.610
<v Speaker 1>like the giants a lot more than I like Miami.

0:20:32.210 --> 0:20:34.220
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. It's a reason that's, that is so good.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:38.189
<v Speaker 4>The, Week one, Divisional Home Dogs being 11-5 against the

0:20:38.230 --> 0:20:41.890
<v Speaker 4>spread because this is what happens, right? These people just

0:20:41.970 --> 0:20:46.270
<v Speaker 4>keep betting up these road teams that are favorites. And

0:20:46.290 --> 0:20:48.430
<v Speaker 4>that's what's happening with Dallas. Like, Dallas is just getting

0:20:48.540 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 4>so much public love here. I knew it eventually would

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 4>shift up. So, I'm in total agreeance. These two teams

0:20:55.500 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 4>aren't that different, especially here in week one. Stylistically... the

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Giants are going to be able to score the ball.

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Like I know Dallas has improved their defense, but this

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.580
<v Speaker 4>fully healthy Giants team was able to move the ball.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.460
<v Speaker 4>The question here has always been, is neighbors playing? That

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.330
<v Speaker 4>to me is a partial reason why this number is moved.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:14.770
<v Speaker 4>Neighbors is a sneaky guy that could get sad here.

0:21:14.869 --> 0:21:18.629
<v Speaker 4>So I'm still betting. I'm still confident in this Giants

0:21:18.650 --> 0:21:20.710
<v Speaker 4>team to be able to win without them, but we'd

0:21:20.810 --> 0:21:23.550
<v Speaker 4>much prefer to have neighbors. He's just a total difference maker.

0:21:23.630 --> 0:21:26.810
<v Speaker 4>So that half point movement could be based off that

0:21:26.850 --> 0:21:29.310
<v Speaker 4>as well. And if neighbors is out, this will be

0:21:29.350 --> 0:21:33.149
<v Speaker 4>three and a half. So, You can just do the trade.

0:21:33.250 --> 0:21:36.980
<v Speaker 4>Go get the 3.5. Don't force bet a 3. You

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:38.379
<v Speaker 4>can get the 3.5 now if you want to, or

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.900
<v Speaker 4>you can be patient. Wait for the neighbor's news, because

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 4>once again, I don't think we touched 2.5 again. There's

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 4>no incentive here. They already are getting all the Dallas

0:21:47.380 --> 0:21:49.100
<v Speaker 4>money they need. They have no reason to drop the

0:21:49.140 --> 0:21:52.330
<v Speaker 4>number back down. I would love to see it. I

0:21:52.330 --> 0:21:53.470
<v Speaker 4>would love to see it go back to 2.5, because

0:21:53.550 --> 0:21:55.550
<v Speaker 4>that would mean we're in a really good position on

0:21:55.570 --> 0:21:57.830
<v Speaker 4>the Giants here, but happy to get the 3.5 if

0:21:57.869 --> 0:22:00.540
<v Speaker 4>they're able to do it right now. It's It's one

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 4>of my favorite bets, like you said, and I'm in

0:22:02.820 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 4>total agreeance it has to be one of our five.

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so to me, the.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Five, let's talk about them, are five official picks for

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.140
<v Speaker 1>NFL Week 1. Again, we will get the contest taken

0:22:14.180 --> 0:22:16.780
<v Speaker 1>care of starting next week. So these are just five

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>official picks at the current numbers. Tampa Bay, plus three

0:22:21.060 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:22:22.300 --> 0:22:26.260
<v Speaker 2>We both love it. Carolina, plus three.

0:22:27.030 --> 0:22:31.650
<v Speaker 1>That's the current line. We're still on it. New York Giants,

0:22:32.030 --> 0:22:34.470
<v Speaker 1>plus three, plus three and a half. You can get

0:22:34.790 --> 0:22:35.369
<v Speaker 1>both numbers.

0:22:36.210 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 2>We love it.

0:22:37.170 --> 0:22:39.409
<v Speaker 1>Houston, plus one and a half. Those are four that

0:22:39.430 --> 0:22:45.380
<v Speaker 1>we're locked in on. I feel like, to me, the

0:22:45.500 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>last one, I like Minnesota at minus one and a half.

0:22:51.619 --> 0:22:54.820
<v Speaker 3>Let's do Minnesota. All right.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:57.859
<v Speaker 2>Our final five.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.380
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, plus three and a half. Houston, plus 1.5. Carolina,

0:23:02.420 --> 0:23:06.300
<v Speaker 1>plus 3. Giants, let's give ourselves the hook, plus 3.5.

0:23:06.300 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>It's widely available at a lot of the prediction markets.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:14.590
<v Speaker 1>And then the final game, Minnesota, minus 1.5. That's the show.

0:23:15.130 --> 0:23:20.909
<v Speaker 1>Simon and I will return 7.30 p.m. Eastern tonight live

0:23:21.390 --> 0:23:24.169
<v Speaker 1>on the Sharper Square YouTube channel with our NFL Week

0:23:24.170 --> 0:23:27.570
<v Speaker 1>1 reactions after the late afternoon games wrap up.

0:23:27.609 --> 0:23:28.430
<v Speaker 2>This has been Sharper Square.

0:23:28.990 --> 0:23:33.550
<v Speaker 1>Sponsored by Polymarket, part of the Volume Podcast Network. Watch

0:23:33.609 --> 0:23:35.930
<v Speaker 1>or listen on YouTube at Sharper Square. Like this video,

0:23:35.950 --> 0:23:38.129
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the channel, download us on Spotify, Apple Pods,

0:23:38.630 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your pods, rate, review, subscribe, leave us

0:23:41.060 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>five stars, say whatever you want.

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.500
<v Speaker 2>Feedback is a gift. Until tonight, love you.

0:23:49.700 --> 0:23:51.290
<v Speaker 3>Ryan airs it out all alone.

0:23:51.380 --> 0:23:52.490
<v Speaker 4>Juggled.

0:23:52.830 --> 0:23:57.510
<v Speaker 3>Incomplete. Jones wide open.