WEBVTT - Does Closure Really Exist?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of I Heart Radio. Hey

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff, Lauren Vogelbaum. Here, after a tragic loss or

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a traumatic breakup, we would all like to believe that

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to turn off the pain switch and

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>get back to a normal life. So when well meaning

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>friends and families say you just need to find some closure,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we think maybe that's the answer. Once we achieve this

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>mythical state of closure, we hope the pain will disappear

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and the bad memories will be wiped clean. The problem,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>psychologists say, is the closure, at least as we understand

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it in popular culture, doesn't really exist. By searching for

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>permanent closure to our emotional pain, they say, we're closing

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ourselves off to healthier ways of processing difficult experiences. The

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>concept of closure comes from gestalt psychology. Gastalt began as

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a way of understanding how the mind proceeds, eaves, and

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>processes images, and one of the principles of gestalt perception

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is that the mind seeks closure. For example, if an

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>image of a circle is incomplete, the mind still perceives

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it as a whole circle. Over time, this principle crossed

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>over to the processing of life experiences. If you suffered

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>an unresolved trauma in the past, Gestalt taught then you

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>were unable to fully move on until the issue was

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>closed in some way. This led to therapeutic techniques like

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the empty chair, in which participants would imagine the source

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of their unfinished business, say an abuse of parent or

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a deceased lover, sitting in the chair and speaking to them.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>While empty chair therapy often provided a short term emotional release,

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it didn't free the subjects from long term pain. Despite

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the questionable efficacy of gestalt therapy, the belief the closure

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is a panacea for emotional pain became deep embedded in

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>American pop psychology. It's a favorite of the news media,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>where the families of murder victims or people affected by

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>terrorist attacks are always looking for closure, and it's a

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>cliche of daytime talk shows when a jilted lover is

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>brought on stage to confront their lousy x so they

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>can finally get some closure. But we spoke with psychotherapist

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Davis Bush, author of Hope and Healing for Transcending Loss,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and she says that unfortunately, the kind of closure peddled

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>by pop psychology isn't really achievable, nor should it be.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Bush said, Americans like happy endings were a feel good society.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>We like clean cut things. We want to believe there's

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>an end to pain. In reality, it's not that the

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>pain ends, but it changes over time. When Bush sees

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>clients who are grieving a lost spouse or close family member,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't talk about achieving closure, which to her, is

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of trying to close the door on honest,

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>if sometimes painful emotions. Instead, she uses terms like healing

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and growth and helps surviving spouses learn how to live

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>with loss or how to carry the precious memory of

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the loved one with them in positive ways. Bush said,

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I also call it living with the love, really allowing

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the memories of that person to fortify you, recognizing that

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>you're a different person because you loved them, that they're

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>still with you in certain essential ways, and not being

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>afraid to honor that relationship. Honoring a relationship with the

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>deceased spouse doesn't mean that the widow or widower is

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>stuck in the past or will be unable to form

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>new relationships. In fact, it's often the opposite. By not

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tempting to blunt or shut down their honest feelings, they

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>remain emotionally alive. Bush has clients who, after passing through

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a period of intense grief, have fallen in love again

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and even remarried without sacrificing deep feelings of loyalty to

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>their first spouse. But what about divorces and bad breakups?

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it still a bad idea to seek closure if

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you're having a hard time moving on from a painful

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>end to a long term relationship. Bush said, that's a

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>different situation. I do think that closure is more relevant

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>when you have the end of a relationship. There really

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are elements of closure, whether it's signing the divorce papers

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>or moving out of the apartment you shared. There's a

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>more specific kind of closure that we think is achievable.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Yet at the same time, we are always affected by

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>our past relationships and will carry those experiences with us.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Bush says, we still need to learn how to honor

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the relationship and gather wisdom from it, even if it

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't end the way that we imagined it would. The question,

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>she says, is whether the emotional baggage we take away

0:04:55.400 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>from the relationship will be heavy or light. One way

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>to lighten our emotional baggage. Research has shown is to

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>write about the breakup. Specifically, researchers asked a hundred people

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>who had recently experienced a breakup to journal for thirty

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>minutes a day for three consecutive days. A portion of

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>participants were told to write exclusively about positive aspects of

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the breakup and how they'd grown because of it. After

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the writing exercise, this group reported no increase in negative

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>emotions and a boost of positive outcomes, including comfort, confidence, empowerment, optimism, thankfulness,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and wisdom. Today's episode was written by Dave Ruse and

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>produced by Tyler Klang. For more in this and lots

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of other curious topics, visit how stuff works dot com.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Brain Stuff is production of iHeart Radio. Or more podcasts

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to my heart Radio visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.