WEBVTT - Buckets Of Bullcrap

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty and he Armstrong and Yedty. Good evening.

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 3>It has been a tradition here at the Late Show

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 3>since yesterday that the major party candidates sit down with

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>me for an interview. In October, we invited Kamala Harris

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 3>to be our guest this evening, and she accepted that

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>interview in a moment. In the interest of fairness, we

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 3>also invited former President Donald Trump.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>To go himself. He declined. Our author show the Wow.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Michael mentioned before the show we should hear the opening

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of Stephen Colbert last night, who had Kamala Harrison as

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the guest. You know, for better or worse, and I

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's for worse. This is the direction we've gone

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>with our culture, where it would have been beyond unheard

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>of to take that point of view as a talk

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>show host back in the day. You just you would

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>not make your preferences that open, no, because it was

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>seen bad for business. It was bad for business, and

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 2>I think also just seen as not the correct way

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>to do things.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it's on gentlemanly and overly aggressive and just

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>mean to other Americans who disagree with you.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 2>But if you want to be successful, now, I suggest

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you do what Stephen Colbert does because he gets great

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>ratings with that. And so that leads us to this

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and the point that Kamala Harris, while doing a media

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>blitz outside of sixty minutes where she was pressed somewhat

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>certainly more than she normally gets, she's doing she's going

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to all friendly venues. I mean only to the point

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>that she did Oprah Winfrey. Oprah Winfrey spoke at her convention.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 2>She did Kristin Welker. Kristen Welker had come out and

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>said she endorses her. Howard Stern endorses her. She's gone

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>on Howard Stern. She went on the View. Of course,

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the views all in love with her, and she went

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>on Colbert, and you just heard how Colbert handled it.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>On The View yesterday, she was asked a question, is

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 2>there anything you would do different than what Joe Biden didn't?

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>She passed on that. She said no, which seems crazy.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Has the change candidate? Yes, it's crazy, And then Colbert

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>asked the same question last night.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Polling shows that a lot of people, especially independent voters,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 3>really want this to be a change election, and that

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 3>they tend to break for you in terms of thinking

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>about change, you are a member of the president administration

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 3>under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 3>and what would say the same?

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Sure, well, I mean I'm obviously not Joe Biden, and

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 4>so that would be one change. But also I think

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 4>it's important to say with you know, twenty eight days ago,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not Donald Trump.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so she decided not to answer the question again.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>We got a little more coming up here, but that

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 2>is interesting. Mark Cowpern made the point in his newsletter

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>that you generally you get these big opportunities to be

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>on big shows and get a big audience. This is

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 2>your gonna get their message out. Here's we're going to

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 2>score some points, move the ball down the fields. It's

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity to get your message out without having to

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>spend a ton of money. You got all that money

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that you're having to spend on advertisements to try to

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>say something. Here you get to say it for free.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>And she had the opportunity to say something, and she

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>chose not to. And as he wrote yesterday, one they're

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 2>making no news with all these interviews, So why do them?

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're not making any news unless your only

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 2>point is to be able to say, oh, we've done

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>lots of interviews, which might be their only point, but

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>they're making no new suspect that may be, but go on,

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>they're making no news, So it would seem that their

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>goal is to not f up. Their only goal is

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>to get out of there without doing damage, which is

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 2>a hell of a way to be a candidate. I

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>can't think of any winning candidates that have done that.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Joe Biden, but that was that weird COVID year,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>so it was slightly different. I'm not sure it would

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>have worked if it hadn't been for COVID. Well, he

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 2>had that convenient excuse.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, So he was never peppered with the why

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>don't you talk to anybody who's gonna ask you any

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>hard questions? Because eventually I think journalists will get there.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump asked answers questions, hard questions all the time. Obama,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>did Bush? Did Clinton?

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Did?

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 2>They go on these shows and they would make news,

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>they'd say things, they'd promote their thing. She is in

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>full prevent for corners defense all the time, which is

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 2>really interesting. And then again, what Mark Alpern wrote today

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>was and he was mystified as to why she didn't

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 2>take these opportunities to separate herself when asked both on

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the View and on Colbert. If these were prepared answers

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>on which she executed, heaven helped Wilmington. That's the home base,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 2>that's where her campaign is based out of. If these

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>were ad libbed answers, heaven help Wilmington. Either way. If

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 2>this was your strategy, oh my god. If this was

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>not your strategy, oh my god.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>If you gave us ten minutes to sit in a

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>room and come up with half a dozen plausible, sexy

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>answers to that question, I'm confident I could do it.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 2>I could certainly come up with three or four.

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I was out trying.

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I would start with, well, if you haven't spent four

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 2>years at a job and not learned something, you're not

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 2>doing it right. And here's what we've learned. And then yeah,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, I had a couple of things makes.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Exactly or even I mean, this is unfair, but it

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just popped into my head. One thing I would change

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is we had believed Republicans would work with us on

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>securing the border, and they didn't. In fact, just as

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we were at a deal, they backed out of it.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why we had all those millions of people pour

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>across the border. So one thing I've learned is don't

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>trust the Republicans to be bipartisan. I mean, that's unfair,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it's bull crap, it's dishonest, but at least it's an answer.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, God helped Wilmington. She's utterly incapable of

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>even the most hackneyed stock political you know, buckets of

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>bull crap.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, her first swing added on the View yesterday was

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, if anything, would you have done something differently than

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 5>President Biden during the past four years.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 4>There is not a thing that comes to mind in

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 4>terms of and I've been a part of most of

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 4>the decisions that have had impact.

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>So that is incredible. Yeah, that is incredible. There's not

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.119
<v Speaker 2>a thing that comes to mind. So again, they either

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>went over this because this is an obvious one. I mean,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>this is absolutely an obvious question. So they either had

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>not thought of it, which means they're it's malpractice, or

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>they did and she's incompletely incapable of remembering what our

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>answer was right. Those are your only two choices, I think.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that she was unable to come up

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>with something on the fly, because again, it's such an

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>obvious question, you'd have to be prepared for it.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there are only two options. They didn't prepare,

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 2>which would be crazy. They did prepare and she couldn't

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>remember it.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Or even something like, well, remember when we took office,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it was still the time of the pandemic, and so

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously our policies were tailored towarding pandemic time when the

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>economy is struggling. Now that we have gotten inflation under control,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be much more growth oriented anything like that.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And instead, I can't think of anything.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a terrible, terrible answer. So back to Colbert.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>So last time in Colbert she's asked the question again,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>she basically says, no, I can't think of anything, and

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>then she goes into this is this is classic Kamala

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Harris right here. And so when we.

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Think about the significance of what this next generation of

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 4>leadership looks like were I to be elected president, it

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 4>is about Frankly, I love the American people, and I

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 4>believe in our country. I love that it is our

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 4>character and nature to be an ambitious people. You know,

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 4>we have aspirations, we have dreams, are we have incredible

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 4>work ethic and I just believe that we can create

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 4>and build upon the success we've achieved in a way

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 4>that we continue to grow opportunity and in that way

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 4>grow the strength of our nation. So, for example, my

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 4>economic policy is I think of it and I have

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 4>named it as creating an opportunity economy.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Man, I believe Americans have maps. Uh yeah, got her

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 2>fallback of the Look, this is a country where I

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 2>believe in the aspirations and people have dreams.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>And wow, boy, that was that was some vapid garbage.

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>If she wins, which right now it is a coin flip.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 2>If she wins, uh, we'll never hear this stuff. But

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>if she loses, people will start pointing fingers and we'll

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>hear pretty quickly. Yeah. We coached her up like crazy,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>and she would She couldn't answer, She couldn't remember anything

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 2>or something, right.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, we we have aspirations, we have dreams.

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what you don't have is like well structured sentences.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>A if she wins and and cracks up, and I

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>am not rooting for that because it would be terrible

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for the country. Then the knives are really, really really

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>going to come out. But yeah, I would be delighted

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if she were to lose. Well, roll the dice with Trump.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But I want to hear the campaign insider say it

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was like trying to train to talk, to drive a car.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we just knew we were doomed from the start.

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>We did our best.

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'd be thing to say.

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm I'm telling you now on a totally

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>different topic, speaking of the media, Thank god.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>That is that is I just it's amazing. It's amazing. Anyways,

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>go ahead.

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So we were talking about the CBS story in both

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Hours two and three where Tony Decouple dared to ask

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>some difficult questions of ton of easy Coats about his

0:10:55.720 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>new book, and the woke CBS newspeople freaked out about

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>it because she showed bias. The fact that he asked

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>difficult questions of a liberal showed bias, when CBS is

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely stemmed to stern packed full of bias.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 2>In digging into.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>This through multiple sources in the audio we came up

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with and the rest of it, I'd missed one aspect

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. One CBS reporter Jan Crawford, who's been their

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>CBS chief Legal correspondent since two thousand and nine, which

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>she said, I am now a huge Jan Crawford fan.

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Oh really can't wait to bring that to cool among

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 2>other things. And Tesla has just unveiled their version of

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 2>a ROBOTAXI remember they're the they're the ones that made

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>electric cars even somewhat viable. Maybe they'll make robo because

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the whole training dogs thing didn't work out.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Weird.

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>They getting weird fast. Stay here. I will read the

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>new Bob Woodword book, which comes out in five days.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I think jd Vance told me he was a hack.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.599
<v Speaker 2>I won't read it. He's definitely not a hack. The

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 2>hack thing that happens with Bob Woodward books is the

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 2>leaks that come out to promote it, which are always

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 2>very misrepresentative respirat. They don't represent well the book in

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 2>its totality when it comes out. But probably talk more

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 2>about that when the book does come out next week. Also,

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Benjamin Netton, Yahoo, who Joe Biden. That's that's interesting they're

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 2>talking today. So one of the blurbs from the new

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Woodward book is that behind the scenes. Biden calls Net

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and Yahoo regularly that effing a hole refers to him,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 2>so does not like a liar, although I think Benjamin

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Natanya was probably fairly thick skinned for a variety of reasons.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, as all politicians are. But they're going to

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>speak together for the first time in weeks, Biden and

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Net and Yahoo as Israel tries to figure out to

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>what extent they're going to attack Iran's I'm sure that

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 2>will be one of the topics came across this. There's

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>a big Tesla event tomorrow. Elon Musk gonna announce a

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>few new things to his regular cars, and then also

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the cyber Cab, which is going to be a vehicle

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that they deploy sometime between the next month and the

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 2>next year. They're not exactly sure how long it'll take

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the roll out, but it's like we've heard of some

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of these other self driving cars and a new version

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>of that, the cyber cab. He has also brought up

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the possibility of Tesla owners letting their cars run as

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 2>robotaxis when they're not in use. I don't feel like

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to like when I'm in sleep at night,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna let my car be running around town with drunk

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>college kids in it. Get ready to hose that thing out, man,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>get in it in the morning, and there's pizza boxes

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and vomit and you know, Lord Musk, if you know

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 2>what I mean. No, uh so, I don't know. I

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>just I do not see this ever happening. I really don't,

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>at least not for a very long time, any sort

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 2>of robotaxi thing where there are no human beings involved

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 2>just because of vandalism. I don't see how you get

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>around that.

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and robberies and that sort of thing, as we

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>discussed yesterday.

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't either.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know that there is a way to

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>circumvent evil people, and everything human beings do must be

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>designed to circumvent evil people. We've got a couple of

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>stories we haven't gotten to on that, just the how

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the online community is coaching everybody on how to rip

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>off stores on fake returns, and how that's billions and

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars. I have another one about the rampant

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>fraud going on to New York City now with the

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>mobs and the various ethnic gangs and faking up accidents

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's a no fault insurance state, and they're ripping

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>off the insurance companies so much the insurance company is

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>going to pull out of New York City completely. All

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>human systems and politics must be designed to recognize.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 2>There are evil doers and predators.

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Among us, and anybody who thinks otherwise, and they can

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>just they only do it because they're poor, or this

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>set because they're the wrong race, or that's the only

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>reason there's crime, and.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 2>You're a fool and an idiot. Yeah, And it would

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 2>seem that many of us will indulge our worst impulses

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>if we can get away with it to an extent,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>we might not even realize ourselves. Luckily, I haven't been

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>put in that situation to fully realize what I might

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>be willing to do. If nobody was watching her, I

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get caught, but plenty of people will. Yeah, And

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>like you said, everything's got to be built around that

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 2>element of human nature. Video here on the New York Post.

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>New York Post is where you go to for sometimes

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>really great journalism, some amazing opinion pieces, and the dumbest

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>of clickbait stories like they fired me because I'm too hot.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, lots of.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Those They said, my preasts are too big to be

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a flight attendant.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, jeez, she must have enormous press. Then I

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>better click on this story. Don't do it, you moron.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Here's one video shows drunk dad dragged under car while

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>allegedly teaching nine year old son how to drive, and

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 2>they've got a video. I haven't watched it yet because

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I gotta watch a commercial. It's too long. You're drunk

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 2>showing your nine year old how to drive. And it's

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>not out in the country like my kids were driving

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 2>when they were nine on our farm. Absolutely, thank you're

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>call in the county. But his nine year old and

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>it's into like a suburban street and he's hammered and

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>he ends up underneath the car.

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>This is that's really a terrible idea, numb nut. So

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one CBS staffer stood up like a hero and protested

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>against the woke onslaught against poor Tony Dicoppel. Her heroic

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>speech coming up next, love It.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 5>We will still, I want to be clear, We will

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 5>still ask tough questions. We will still hold people accountable.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 5>That's part of our job too, but we will do

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 5>so objectively and that means very plain, we have to

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 5>check up bias and opinions at the door, and that

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 5>applies to every single point. We are not here to

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 5>represent any viewpoint. We are here to tell stories and

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 5>I say this a lot. We are here to report

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 5>news without fear or faith.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>That is Adrian Rourke, who's one of the higher ups

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>at CBS News, lecturing the whole news crew on not

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>having bias because a conservative dared to ask some difficult

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>questions of a progressive author and everybody freaked out.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 2>It is utterly hilarious.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It is expository, meaning they've exposed themselves. It's frustrating because

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>she sounds sincere.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, which leads me to believe that all this bias

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing, especially around these debates, is they believe

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 2>they're being fair. They think they're being fair moderators and

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 2>treating both sides equally. It's just a one side's evil

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 2>and one side's good, so we don't need to fact

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 2>check them. They actually believe it. No, no my sides

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>telling the truth. What would I fact check?

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>That guy's lying all the time, And especially in the

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>wake of CBS editing Kamala Harrison, the the unforgivable one

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sided moderation of the VEEP debate the other day, and

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just CBS has leaned to the left for years and

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>years and years and years, the idea that she would

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be bellowing and demanding no bias here in the wake

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of again some difficult but fair questions being asked of a.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Progressive It's just it's just pathetic, it's just sad and on.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>During this one sided onslaught, though, Jan Crawford, who's been

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the CBS chief Legal correspondent since nine actually was like

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the one person or one of very few to rush

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to Tony da Couple's that's the journalist and question who

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ask the tough questions of tin of easy coats. Uh,

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>she rushed to the couple's defense, and uh, we'll start

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>with one O seven Michael.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 2>So I guess we're.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 5>It sounds like we're calling out one of our anchors

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 5>in a somewhat public setting on this call for failing

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 5>to meet editorial standards. I'm not even sure what. I

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 5>don't understand how Tony's interview or any of his comments

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 5>that he's made with anchors failed to, you know, meet

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 5>our editorial standards that obviously go back to the days

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 5>of Murrow and you know Cronkite, which, of course I

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 5>thought our commitment was too truth. And when someone comes

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 5>on our air with a one sided account of a

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 5>very complex situation, as Cost himself acknowledges that he has,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 5>it's my understanding that as a journalist we are obligated

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 5>to challenge that worldview so that our viewers can have

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 5>that access to the truth or a fuller account, a

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 5>more balanced account. And to me, that is what Tony did.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 5>He challenged Coast his worldview, his one sided worldview. Coast

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 5>got to respond, it was civil.

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'd have.

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 5>To look this up. I don't know if I'm quoting

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 5>it exactly, but I read the Washington Post and they

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 5>said it was calm, and you know, artfelt. I think

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 5>those are the words they used.

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 2>To a great extent. It's such an age thing. I'm

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 2>guessing Jane Crawford because she's been at CBS like mine,

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 2>tire following CBS News life, she's probably roughly my age,

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 2>in her fifties. I'm guessing it's just that people that

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>have been around long enough to remember when no our

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>goal is to try to be somewhat fair and just

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 2>to get to the truth. And then there's the new

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 2>crowd that thinks, no, no, no, our goal is to out

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 2>the evil side and protect our side. And there's just

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 2>that division there age wise, and I would guess that

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Jan Crawford didn't do her career any favors there by

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>standing up for the old version.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>God bless her, though she can walk away with her

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>chin up and her integrity. Intact, let's say hear more

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>from Jan.

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't see how we can say that failed to

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 5>meet our Edit Royal standards.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I thought our.

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 5>Edit Royal standards focused on and when we announced this

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 5>in a public setting, which I understand, you say you've

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 5>addressed it with Tony, I don't know what that even means.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 5>But you know, it's when we fail to or when

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 5>we broadcast false information or we adequate, you know, don't

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 5>adequately verify something, which we have done in the past,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 5>and we've acknowledged that. But here I think Tony did

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 5>the opposite. He prevented a one sided account from being

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 5>broadcast on our network about a deeply complex, as you said,

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 5>situation that you know completely was devoid of history or fact.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 5>And as journalists, it seems to me, that's what we

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 5>have an obligation to do. And as someone that does

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot of interviews, including on controversial topics with public figures,

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, I'm not.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Really sure now how.

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 5>To proceed in challenging the viewpoints that are obviously one

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 5>sided and devoid of your history.

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Don't is what they're saying. I'm sorry, old lady. I

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>looked it up. She's exactly our age. Sorry, old lady,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>times have changed. You're talking about a prior era, which

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 2>isn't even that long ago. But times have changed. You're

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 2>not supposed to challenge a one sided point of view

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 2>if it's the same point of view that the network has.

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>That's not your joby.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We will be biased all day long until a conservative

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>actually asks a progressive hard questions. Then we will yell

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>about how we have no bias. It is the official policy.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>It's something to watch that that liberals my whole life.

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Like Bill Maher, Matt Tayebi, who we quote all the time,

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 2>who's also in his fifties. Jan Crawford there, who I've

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 2>always was. She was a left leaning journalist. For me,

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>my whole life is now standing up. For wait a second,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 2>we're not supposed to let somebody be completely one sided.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 2>But man, it's interesting how much things have changed so quickly.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Now. Given Adrian Rourke, the News had there given her

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>very framing of the discussion, everything she said, the way

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>she described the issues, and their standards and what biases

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and their duty to their viewers.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:00.719
<v Speaker 2>And everything she said.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Jan Crawford took on the argument on those terms and

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to me is winning its hands down. You'll notice the

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>interesting twist at the end of this final clip.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't understand how we can say that violated CBS

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 5>News is editorial standards, and I don't understand if that's

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 5>the case, what is the objective standard for the rest

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 5>of us when we're doing our own interviews. Again, like

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 5>I said, I'm trying to just process this, so I

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 5>appreciate you speaking of I appreciate you bringing all this up,

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 5>and as I said, I know that this is a

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 5>lot for.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Everybody to process. No, it's not thing.

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 5>What I want to do is talk to you personally

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 5>after this, just in the interest of letting everybody get

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 5>get get you on the editorial and knowing what today is.

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 5>I'll call you right after this, or I just can

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 5>jump off and call you now, no, I mean, we

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 5>have news to get through. It is a very important day.

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean I know I didn't was not aware that

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 5>people had reached out to you or Wendy. I wish

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 5>that I had to say a great job, Tony or

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 5>you know, way to not allow a one sited account

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 5>on a deeply complex issue be presented on our network,

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 5>which is a disservice to our viewers. I didn't know

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 5>that that was something I needed to do, but Jef,

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 5>I would very much welcome the opportunity.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 2>To have that conversation. Thank you. We will have that

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 2>right after this.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Persolutely on industry source said Crawford has quote balls of

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>steel and as one of the most respected journalists that CBS.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>He added, it's disgraceful that management chose not to answer

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>her question in front of the whole group on the call.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Unless you are turning the page toward the new journalism,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>which is about advocacy, You choose a side and you

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>advocate advocate for it. That's your job. And I don't

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>know if that manager bel leaves that, but I think

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 2>she believes all of her young people believe it. And

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 2>yet she, as I said, she framed the entire thing

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>with the traditional ethics.

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then when Jan Crawford said, well the traditional

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>ethics Tony fulfilled in spades four stars.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I think, well we should talk privately. I see the

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>conundrum there. I guess you can't say it out loud.

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 2>So it is the new journalism that may take over.

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe already has most places. But maybe you can't take

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>a good decisions, son, but maybe you can't say it

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 2>out loud. Hanson just said in my ear that manager

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 2>is seething right now. Yeah. When a manager says to you,

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>let's have this conversation afterwards in private, they're probably very

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 2>unhappy that you will.

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Because you've exposed me as a lying hypocrite, right and

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you've exposed me as somebody not only a hypocrite, but

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is in violation of the very principles I'm spouting at

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the moment.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I think this is fascinating. It's happened at the Washington Post,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 2>It's happened in the New York Times. You're hearing it,

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 2>getting to hear it at CBS News. Who's gonna win out?

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it gonna be the no journalism is supposed to

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 2>get to the truth, or is journalism supposed to advocate

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>for a position who's gonna win out in the end.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't like our chances. I just

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 2>want to I don't know.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there a GoFundMe for jan Crawford or can I

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>kiss her or give her a high five or a

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>buy stock or something. I just I so appreciate her

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>courage and eloquence in defense of the very freaking principles.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think MAYBELD Adrian Rourke was droning on about, well,

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we get an interesting text from somebody said, you guys

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously have never been managers of large groups of people.

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>What that person is trying to do is deal with

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a very hostile set of employees underneath her, and you know,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to get them to work together. Okay,

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't know.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It seemed like on this particular topic, you got to

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 2>choose a side, you got to choose a direction. You

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 2>can't there's no bringing it together. You're either going to

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 2>do journalism the way it's always been or at least

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>for the last seventy five years, or not. Yeah.

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say to that person, I see your point,

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate it. I get what you're trying to

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>say you have to calm things down before you solve problems.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't believe that Ms Rourke was actually trying

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to do that. I think she was giving into the

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>worst impulses of her mob of you know, woke employees

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to burn the place to the ground. You can't.

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>At some point you have to make a stand. Although

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>again your point is well taken.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>So do you think Jan Crawford doesn't know that, For instance,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Columbia Journalism School, maybe the most respected journalism school in America,

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.719
<v Speaker 2>has decided that advocacy journalism is the new way.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think I think she's one hundred percent acquainted

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with it, like I said, and that was that was

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason I went to Pains to point out that

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>she used the very principles the Miss Rourke was expressing.

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>She met her with her own verbiage and challenged her.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think, why do you think the boss

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't say it, doesn't say it out loud? Why do

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you think places don't say it out loud? Well, if

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that is the direction journalism is going, advocacy journalism, and

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the young people want it that way. Just because you

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 2>think you'd turn off everybody over the age of forty five.

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, keeping in mind the contribution of the texture there

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we were taking Adrian and Rourke at a word that

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>she thinks she's being unbiased. I think that person's point

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>was she was just trying to defuse the young man

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>acts well and Gail although Gail King she's friends with

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Coats and a far lefty and a racialist activist and

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it. I think it wasn't just young

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>woke staffers. I think it was the very liberal heavyweights

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of CBS News who are on the war path, and

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>she's It could be Rourke knew she was threading an

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>impossible needle, but was just trying to diffuse the anger

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the lefty.

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Heavyweights because she had no other choice.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>She couldn't win that fight. I don't know yet.

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm disturbed by the state of mainstream journalism. Everything woke

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 2>turns to Now. A lot of you would say, oh,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>who cares. I don't read the New York Times, I

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 2>don't watch CBS Evening News. I get all my news

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 2>from And then you would name a bunch of things

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I've probably never even heard of. Sure, but I don't

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 2>know if that's gonna work force where everybody's got their

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 2>own sources. You don't know if that's going to work.

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't. As I've often said, we'll all find out together. Yeah,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 2>we will. We'll finish strong next The hurricane still has

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a possibility to be a major factor in the presidential election,

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 2>depending how the relief efforts continue in North Carolina and

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Georgia and Tennessee, and also with Milton Barren down on Florida.

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 2>The mayor there in Tampa, who yesterday said if you stay,

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna die, today said, if you plan to ride

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>out the hurricane, that's a coffin you're in in your home.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, finding a new way to express it. Okay, I

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>guess so. So he's probably damn close to right, given

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the predicted storm surge.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I haven't been paying that close attention. I don't know.

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 2>There are many examples, I think when they have asked

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>for these evacuations, I've always thought I'd stay, depending on

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>my lifestyle. If I got kids would be a different

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>calculation than if I'm by myself and all that sort.

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Of stuff, and you're eleven cats, of course, to protect them.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Milton expected to hit Florida with so much force. It

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 2>could change forever the coastline of Florida. Uh, the world's

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 2>worst influencer. This is a woman refusing to evacuate before

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the hurricane who says she's okay with dying. Okay, nice,

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna hit tonight the hurricane is in.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Go an hour inland and stay at the Holiday Inn.

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Instead of dying. I don't think you could. At this point,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 2>every hotel room is booked or closed. They have their

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Tropicana field where the baseball team plays. It's full of cots.

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it up high enough to not have the water

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>come in here? I suppose hard getting in the stadium.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd walk into the Holiday and knock on

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>every door, say hey, do you have two beds in there?

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you two hundred bucks to let me sleep

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>here tonight. I'm a nice fella. A good conversation, you mean, like,

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to talk about the room that

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>people are already in?

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you're just gonna hope they like the looks together.

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Hi'd eyeball them as well. Sure the wife thinks you're

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 2>hot or something.

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Be sleeping on a cottona stadium.

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Almost finish, Let's get ready final thoughts with Armstrong and Getty.

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe.

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Gimmy, let's get a final thought from everybody on the

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>crew to wrap up the day. Michaelangelo or technical director

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>lead us off my yeah very quickly.

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>How many TikTok videos are we going to see?

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>If people trying to write out Milton or you know,

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>try to get followers that way.

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this one's gonna be one of those.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it is. Now.

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's Darwin at work. Katie Greener is seemed to use

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>woman as a final thought.

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Katie, I don't know why.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>The image of you going door to door to holiday

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and asking if you could sleep in people's rooms.

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Just made me laugh so hard. Mind if I sleep

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 2>with your family? Yeah, I got an extra buff kid.

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a family of four. I'm gonna say, hey, sorry

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 2>to Boby. I'll move on. Ye just looking for place

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 2>to sleep? Jack final thought, I haven't heard it yet.

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Howard Stern gushes over Kamala Harrison interview and laments SNL

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 2>making fun of her. Okay, fine, Stern.

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>The great rebel, the great non follower of rules, is

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:28.959
<v Speaker 1>now just a boot licking lackey of Jopy dishonest politicians.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Didn't think I'd see that day, Armstrong and Getty wrare

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I pick up another grueling four hour workday.

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So many people would think, so little time. Go to

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>armstrong in giddy dot com. A lot of great hot

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>links there for you to read. Watch et Cetera drop

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>his note mail bag at armstrong giddy dot com, Florida.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Good luck, see you tomorrow. God bless America. I'm Strong

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and Getty.

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It's one hundred on the crazy meter, even the particular

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.280
<v Speaker 1>field and particularly of harsh attacks.

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 2>We have aspirations, we have dreams, and I say this

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot. So let's go with the bine. You just

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 2>put on the full clown outfit. Put on the.

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Red shoes, put on the nose of the wig, and

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the weird jumpsuit.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 2>Clowns wear wear pants, clowns fit. Thanks all very much,

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty