WEBVTT - James Comey, Incompetent or Corrupt?

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This investigation of the president was corrupt. The FBI and

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice were politicized and weaponized. And in

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, there are only two possibilities that you were

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>deliberately corrupt or woefully incompetent, and I don't believe you

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>were incompetent. This has done severe damage to the professionals

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and the honorable men and women at the FBI because

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement should not be used as a political weapon,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and that is the legacy you have left. This might

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>be my favorite aspect of the show. I mean, this

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is what we've been seeing since impeachment, all the way

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>back what was it eight nine months ago? Now is

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we get the first look and the first talk with

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Senator Cruz after all of these extraordinarily consequential events. Senator,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you have just come from a hearing with former FBI

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Director James Comey. James Comy is not just a controversial figure,

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but he has, in your words, either incompetent or worse.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's if you wouldn't mind take us through the hearing. Well, yeah,

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so he was testifying about his leadership at the FBI

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and his role in the investigation of President Trump of

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>his campaign of Michael Flynn of Carter Page, and I

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>got to say, you know, you know, Comy at this

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>point just blames everything on Oh, mistakes were made, the

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>passive voice was used, nobody as an actor. It just

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>just happened to happen. Oh up, some things were sloppy.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta say I thought too many Republican senators

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>were willing to credit him with Oh, you just didn't

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>know what was going on, Bologny. Comey knew exactly what

0:01:55.240 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>was going on. Comy, I believe bears very direct responsibility

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>for politicizing the FBI, for politicizing dj and Obama and

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Biden used Komy and used Brennan to turn dj CIA,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>FBI and the political weapons to go after Trump. And

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Komy was complicit the hearing today which I

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>just came from. I spent most of the morning over

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>at the hearing. He's very good at dodging and weaving.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>He's slippery. He doesn't like to answer a direct question.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, he talked about well, anytime, anytime the

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>FBI is thought of as less than competent or honest,

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem. And I pointed out that in according

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Inspector General report, they made seventeen material misstatements

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Federal Court. And he's like, oh, well, yeah,

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's competent and honest and and and he said, well

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he was honest at least, and I said, well, no.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>One of those was when an FBI lawyer who worked

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for you fraudulently altered a document from the CIA. He

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>emailed the CIA and said, hey, it's Carter Page a

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>source for you because he's talking to the Russians. But

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>if he's talking to the Russians on behalf of the CIA,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that's very different than if he's running around with Russian agents. See.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, oh, yeah, he's a source for us. And

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the FBI lawyer fraudulently altered that email and added the

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>words is not a source, literally turned it to the

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what it said. I mean, I mean reversed

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>its meaning one hundred and eighty degrees, and they used

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that as the basis for a submission to the Federal Court. Comy,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>being slippery as he is, said no, no, no, that's

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>not what the Inspector General concluded. And fortunately I had

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the IG report right in front of me, so I

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>pulled it over and read the damn quote from the report,

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and he just he had nothing to say on that.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I like this dichotomy that you drew between incomptance and corruption.

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I think even I and I think for so many

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are listening, who don't have the time to

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>go through all of the aspects of what this means

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for spying on the Trump campaign and the Russian collusion narrative,

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and on and on and on, and it's complicated. It's

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to figure out. It is hard to figure out.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>And we know that bureaucracies are incompetent a lot of

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the time. So I think even a lot of us

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>who are pretty conservative will say, Okay, maybe we'll give

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>them the benefit of the devil. What you're pointing to

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>here is one the language that Komy uses, this passive

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>voice which he always uses, is designed to push away

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>any sort of guilt, and we can read in the

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>report that there was flagrant intentional dishonesty. Yeah. A couple

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of additional observations. Komy at the hearing today and at

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the press all the time, makes all these dispersions. Like

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>he said at the hearing, I think the Russians have

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>something on Trump. And mind you, he has no basis

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>he was leading the FBI. It used to be the

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that you actually have something based on evidence rather than

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>just making making wild accusations. But listen, I know James

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Comy not well, but I've dealt with him for a

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>number of years. I think Comey was deeply, deeply political,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>small p political political in the maneuvering, and I think

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Comey had delusions of grandeur. He worked in the Jed

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>gro Hoover building, which is the headquarters of the FBI,

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think he thought he was Jed Groover. I mean,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Hoover famously abused the power of head of the FBI

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and basically blackmailed people, had you know, all sorts of

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>incriminating information on lots of players. And I think Comy, look,

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Comy played a role in twenty sixteen and torpedoing Hillary

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the end and then an exonerating Hillary and going

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, and I think he was playing politics.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And then I think he felt guilty about the role

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>he played in Hillary. And I think he hated Trump

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and he was perfectly happy to have the FBI be

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a political weapon. And there needs to be accountability. People

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>need to go to jail for breaking the law and

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to date, they haven't, and I hope they do. Will

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they be held to account? I mean, I know we're

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>having hearings at the Senate, we're having the investigation from

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ into all the mess that happened. Is there

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be some consequence to all of this or

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>are the nefarious players just going to run out the clock? Look,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I pray they will. I don't know. I think Bill

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Barr is doing a terrific job. I think if anyone

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>can ensure some accountability, it's bar. That being said, it's

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>been four years and there hasn't been much of any

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one of the things I asked Comey

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about is is he testified under oath and under penalty

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>of perjury that he had never leaked to the press

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>and that he'd never authorized anyone to leak to the press.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Concerning this, Andrew McCabe, who was his deputy, has publicly

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>stated that he leaked to the press and that Comy

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>authorized him to do so, and he knew about it.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I asked Coomy about it. I read the

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>two statements. I said, Look, these are directly contradictory. They

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>can't both be true. So who's telling the truth and

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Comy again under oath, reiterated that he never leaked and

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>never authorized anyone to leak. McCabe's coming before the Judiciary

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Committee next week, and you better believe I'm going to

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>ask him the same thing. One or the other. Is

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>lying and doing it in front of the Judiciary Committee.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Is perjury that is punishable by prison term. Well, we'll

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously have to cover that next week. You know, I

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>want to get to the debates a little bit. And

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>actually this ties directly in one one line that President

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump came back to last night, as he said, there

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>was an attempted coup. The previous administration spied on my campaign,

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they drove up this whole ridiculous narrative. They tried to

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>impeach me over absolutely nothing. And so it's not a

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>minor issue. It's not enough to just say, oh, well

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that was a few years ago. We'll move on. You know,

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this is an issue that gets to the heart of

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the integrity of our political system, and that there was

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a parallel I felt at the debate,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>which is that it's supposed to be the two people

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>who disagree, right, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and a

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>neutral moderator. There are supposed to be neutral, nonpartisan elements

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to our government, and the moderator, just like a lot

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of elements of the government, turned out to be a

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>partisan Democrat weighing in on the side of Joe Biden. Yeah.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Chris Wallace did an abysmal job. I think

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he's consistently been a really bad presidential debate moderator because

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he's biased, and he's condescending, and he thinks it's all

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>about him. And so you saw, you know, before the debate,

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>he said he wanted to be invisible, but that disappeared

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>when the debate started, where he you know, there was

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stomping his foot and you know, I'm

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>in charge here, listen to me. You know, reminded me

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of South Park, you know, respect my authority. I mean,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that was Chris Wallace, and yes, and

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>but he was also Look, a lot of people get

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>confused because Wallace is on Fox News, and so they

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>assume he might must be a Republican or right of center.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>He's a liberal Democrat and he's been in the entire

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>time I've been in the Senate. I've seen Wallace do

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it over and over again, that he attacks conservatives, that

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he carries water for the left. You saw with the questions,

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of his questions to Trump was the

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>New York Times hit piece on the taxes, which you know,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>conveniently two days before the debate, entirely designed to be

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the attack on the debate. Now, mind you, the New

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>York Times doesn't actually release the tax documents, so it's

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>purely the Times's characterization of them. But but Wallace does

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>none of that to Biden. Apparently there are no issues

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>with Biden. Did you know that there are no criticisms

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of Joe Biden? Lucky guy? You know, at times Wallace's

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>question were almost like, you know, mister Vice President, are

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you more handsome or brilliant? Like like like it was,

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and his little his laughter, his snide comments. There is

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>zero doubt for whom Chris Wallace is voting, that he

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is voting for Joe Biden. And that's not a good

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>thing for for a moderator. Now, you know, we were

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about Senate Judiciary Committee a minute ago and how

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the witnesses testify under penalty of perjury. I think it's

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a good thing that neither of the candidates last night

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>were testifying under penalty. There's some exaggerations perhaps in there,

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or worse, it was wild and Woolley. I don't think

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>there's ever been a debate like this in the history

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of presidential debates. At times it was ugly. I drew

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>an analogy to the Detroit Pistons basketball team in the

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties in that there were a lot of hard

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>fouls and miss shots. And you know, Trump at times

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was Bill Lambier, coming with this massive arm and slamming

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe across the head. Now Joe was rabbit punching back,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it was at times it almost became

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Springer and I expected someone to grab a chair

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and like throw it at the other. It was disappointing,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I felt, I have to say it was. It was

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously a two on one debate Wallace and Biden against

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump to begin with, but I think a lot of

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>people were dispirited because you felt on the substance, Trump

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>had much more than Joe Biden. And even even on

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the attacks, Joe Biden's attacks were just to call Trump

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a clown and a racist and tell him to shut up,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>man and come on man. But it was so childish

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and I understand maybe the President's strategy was to off

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>foot Biden a little bit, but I felt there were

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>too many interruptions. I felt that was counterproductive. It was

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>just dispiriting. I felt for both camps. What do you

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think the upshot of it is going to be for

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>both campaign and how do you think that they can

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>do better next time? Yeah, Look, I don't think the

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>debate moved many votes last night. I think the people

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that came in supporting Trump left supporting Trump. The people

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that came in supporting Biden left supporting Biden. I don't

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>think there were a whole lot of undecided voters whose

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>views were changed. Both candidates had good moments in the debate.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump I think his best moment was when he called

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>out Biden and he explained that Biden is supporting shutting

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>down the economy, shutting down small businesses, shutting down restaurants,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>destroying job, shutting down schools. And Trump contrasted that says

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>he wants people to open, go back to work, go

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>back to school. That was really important, and Biden didn't

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>have a good response to that. Biden was trying to

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>run away from his positions. I thought that was a

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>very positive exchange. I also thought Trump was particularly good

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>went on law enforcement. You know, Joe made reference to

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>being supported law enforcement, and Trump said, really, name one,

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>name one law enforcement organization in all of America supporting you,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and Joe just kind of blinked, wide eyed and had

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>no idea. And then, of course Chris Wallace jumped in

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and bailed Joe out. Wallace should have shut up and

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>stayed out of it right then, and Trump should have

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>been quiet yeah and pressed it. It's one very powerful

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>thing in a negotiation, in an interview is silence. Silence.

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>People hate silence. People want to fill silence with space.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the question Trump asked, name one law

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>enforcement agency in the entire country that has supported you.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think if Trump had just simply looked at him

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and waited, and there had been two three, four, five

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>six seconds of silence as violent Biden had no answer,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it would have been really powerful that being said, the

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>point was made. Nonetheless, the point was made, and it

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>was too bad that Chris Wallace jumped in. I mean,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously I guess that was what he was there for,

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>was to go in and help the Democrat. But there

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is this basic rule in politics I don't need to

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, which is that when your opponent is

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>destroying himself, don't get in the way. There's no reason

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to interrupt that well, and by the way, an another

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>quick example, you know Joe Biden, he tried a couple

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of times to run away from some positions of the left.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>He pretended he didn't support packing the cord, or actually

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>technically he said he wouldn't answer that question, which means yes,

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he supports packing the cord. He did help himself, I

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>think when he came out strongly and said that he

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>opposed defunding the police, although I think both Wallace and

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump should have pressed back on him hard. And I

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>thought it was interesting that he ran away from the

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Green New Deal and said I don't support the Green

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>New Deal. If Wallace were actually being a fair and

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>impartial moderator, the natural follow up question to that is

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>why aspects of the Green New Deal do you not support?

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>You're running mate as a co sponsor of it. I mean,

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there was no substance, so he was able to say no,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, I don't I don't support that, but

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>with no details, and he wasn't pressed one iota. And

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the first question of the debate actually is what we

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>were talking about on the last episode. The first topic

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>dominated the beginning was the Supreme Court, and it was

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on this issue of court packing, and it was on

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>other other aspects of the Supreme Court. Coincidentally, you happen

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a book out on this subject, One Vote Away.

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it kind of vindicates what we

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>were saying on the previous episode, which is that, however

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it is today, I don't however it came to be

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court is the dominant issue in the presidential elections. Now,

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. It was the number one question

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the debate. The book, One Vote Away, it came

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday. It's actually done really well. We did podcast

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and we asked folks thank you for going going

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>online to Amazon or wherever and buying it. We've been

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten national best sellers on Amazon. Actually

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>right now on Amazon's best seller list for political conservativism

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and Liberalism, which is sort of an odd odd list

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're I guess a righty or lefty. Um, the

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>book is right now number one, and I gotta say

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Verdict listeners, you guys are a huge part

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of why that is thank you that really it makes

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a difference, and I think I think you'll find the

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>book really interesting and informative and helpful, hopefully for the

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>same reason that that you find verdict helpful. Right. Well,

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it's actually I think it would be a good contrast

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to the debate, which is that I am professionally obligated

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch every minute of that debate, and if I

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>were not professionally obligated to do it, I would not

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>have it. I didn't feel it was productive. It was

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult often to watch and listen to. But it's different

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about the book. You're you actually do leave.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm not just shilling for your book. I

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>really am enjoying it because for this reason, you leave

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with actual information, so you can say, Okay, this is

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this is ammo I can use frankly, when I'm having

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>these debates with my friends and I'm at the water

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>cooler or I'm wherever at a dinner party. Well, and

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you know the debate last night. The first question, actually

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Wallace asked a good first question. It was a neutral

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>moderator question where he said, mister President, your position on

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court vacancy is as follows. Vice President Biden,

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>your position is as follows. And he fairly neutrally characterized

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>both sides, and he said, tell us why, why you're right?

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>And then so he just teat up the issue and

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>then let them engage. That was actually a pretty good beginning.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>It was it was not as biased as some of

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>his later questions. I got to say. The president's response,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he essentially said, well, I'm president, and I got elected,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so I get to nominate, and we won. And I

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>wish I wish the president had focused on why it matters,

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>why the Supreme Court matters, what's at stake. I wish

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the president had focused on the issue is really at

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the core of the book. One vote away that he

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about free speech or religious liberty of the Second Amendment.

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I was a college debater, we used

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to think all the time, when when you were in

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>an opposition of of focusing on harms. In fact, you know,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say, harms, harms, harms, how does it impact you?

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And and a little bit of the back and forth

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>between Trump and Biden, it was about them and and

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and I really think it would have been more effective

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for it to be about you at home, if you're

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the soccer mom at home watching this debate. Okay, yes,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>people elected the president. And by the way, Biden had

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge created a huge opening because he came and said, well,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the American people deserved to have a say. They get

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to vote on a president, they get to vote on

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and they deserve to have a say. That

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>was his reason why we shouldn't vote on him. And

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump had a natural response of you know what, Joe

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely right. The American people deserved to have a say,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and they did. They elected me in twenty sixteen. I

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>told him what kind of justice I was going to appoint.

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>They elected a Republican Senate. They told him what kind

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of justice we were going to confirm. And Joe, there's

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a reason the American people that they want free speech.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't want the government prohibiting you criticizing politicians. They

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>want religious liberty, they want to be able to worship.

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>They want the Second Amendment. And Joe, your justices would

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>take away Second Amendment rights from Americans. It was a

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity that Joe kind of stuck his chin out

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>there and asked to be clavered, not in a personal attack,

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>but really a substantive of your vision for America is

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>not what the American people want, and it's not how

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 1>they voted in twenty fourteen in the Senate, in twenty

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen in the Senate and the presidency, or in twenty

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen in the Senate. That's a great insight. I mean,

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw that missed opportunity there. I felt you could

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have hit it. But I like the framing that you've

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just described, which is it's not about me, it's about you,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget that was a huge help to President

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump in the general election in twenty sixteen when Hillary's

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>slogan was I'm with her, and he said, forget that,

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, completely flips there races I'm with you.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And in the spirit of that, as a matter of fact,

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get to some mail bad questions

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>from you, not you senator, but you out there. And

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this does relate to the debate. This question is from

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Brandon what changes could be made to make the debates

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>more effective or I'll add listenable. Look, at some level,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible if the two are going to yell at

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>each other. President Trump in particular want like is looking

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>for a brawl. I actually think he would be better

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>off sort of ratcheting down a little bit and engaging

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in a more more of a conversation and discussion. But

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be benefited from having moderators. I

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 1>think rather than pretending people are unbiased, we ought to

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just admit. So I'd have a Republican moderator, a Democratic moderator.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd have a you know, how about have Sean Hannity

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and Rachel Maddow moderator debate together and everyone will know

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which hat they're wearing, or you know, or Mark Levin

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>or Rush Limbaugh or Michael Knowles or Ben Shapiro. I mean,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you imagine Ben modering a debate and fine,

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>get some whatever, smart lefty, get lefty Ben Shapiro and

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hayes. That would actually be an interesting debate. Now

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>everyone gets that Shapiro would ask questions. He's coming from

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a perspective, and Hayes is coming from a perspective, and

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 1>they would ask questions to advance their perspectives. I think

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that actually be a more honest debate, an interesting debate,

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because it would expose the weaknesses of both sides and

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>help people make an intelligent decision. Absolutely, I totally agree

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this idea of when can we get back to a

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>perfectly balanced, neutral objective press that probably never existed, that

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is missing the point. Let's just be honest

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, and that way you get to some fairness. Now,

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this question is going to come from the opposite end

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of watching or listening to last night's debate from Margot.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>What does Senator Cruz do for fun to take a

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>break from politics? Play basketball? I love hoops about the past.

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I played two hours of hoops yesterday, played two hours

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of hoops two days ago. I can barely walk because

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I turned fifty and a couple of months, so for

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to five hours of hoops is a bit too much. Um.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I like playing tennis. I love movies. I'm I used

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to go to the movies at least once a week.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love being in the big movie theater.

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Um play with my kids. I mean the girls are

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>nine and twelve, so so free time at home is

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>family time. We play games. I'm love to play games,

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>play poker, UM play backgammon with Catherine, she likes backgam

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and we play monopoly, played dominoes. UM, dominoes is a

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Cuban favorite. So every Thanksgiving and Christmas, the family will

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get around. Cubans, by the way, play double nine dot

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>double sixes, and and and my college and law school

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>roommate guy named David Panton, who's Jamaican. In Jamaica, they

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>play a lot of dominoes as well. They played double sixes.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>And David came to visit the house a couple of

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>months ago when when Heidi was out of town, and

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>so we just had kind of a boy's weekend hanging out,

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and a couple other guys came over and we played

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>dominoes at the dining room table and and and that

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>particular time, David's a very good Domino's player. I happened

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to win that particular night, and so I called up

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>my dad. My dad is a very good Domino's players too,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>And I called up and I said Dad, and my

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>father knows David really well. And I said, Dad, you

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>really need to come for David right now. And actually

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you to pray for him, because

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he just flew all the way to Houston

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and he just got got humiliated at dominoes and and

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's hurting and so dad and I have him

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on FaceTime and I said, you know, Dad, I'm asking

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>you to to commiserated. My father had just finished playing

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>dominoes with my cousin and my dad happened to have

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>one too, and so my father was having He said,

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we ought to get David Marino together

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and then they can commiserate on on what it's like

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to to need to study dominoes. More so, it was

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>not we weren't showing a whole lot of compassion at

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that moment. Senator, I've got to tell you, while I'm

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 1>picturing you playing dominoes at the table, all I'm picturing

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>is you guys lining them all up and then you

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>push one down and they all that's that's I don't

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>know how to play dominoes. That's all I know how

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with them, But it creates a much funnier

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>immage you. I notice you left one thing off the list,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>which is my favorite hobby that we've ever done together.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>The cigars. Where are the cigars? It doesn't make the

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>top ten? Um, so when I play poker, I love

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to smoke cigars. Um. All right. A funny Heidi story.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>When Heidi and I were engaged. Um. I used to

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>host a regular poker night and my buddies would come

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>over at the dining room table and we'd we'd play

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>poker and we'd smoke cigars sitting at the dining room table,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, man, your girlfriend or your fiance

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is amazing, Like I can't believe she let you smoke inside.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just like, yeah, yeah, that's like you know what,

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm yeah, that's that's just how cool it is. Cool's amazing.

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And we got married May twenty seventh, two thousand and one.

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>We're coming up on our twentieth anniversary. We literally get

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>back from the honeymoon. I'm getting rid of host poker game.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>She says, get the damned cigars outside. You are never

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to smoke it inside again. And I never have. It's

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>been twenty years since I've been able to smoke a

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>cigar inside. So so sometimes the engagements rules are different

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>from the marriage rules, and then I can see that

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of it changes like that. I suppose. I

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>suppose marriage is a bad sacrifice, good though, to be

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>able to take a moment to relax, even if you

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have to do it outside. Now, to have a little

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of fun, because a lot to celebrating gratulations on

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the book going so far up up the list, and

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be sure for everyone to go out there and get

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a copy of One Vote Away. I promise it will

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>be a substantive distraction from all the madness that you're

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be getting in the media for the next

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>couple months of the presidential cycle. We're gonna be back

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>forgetting about our relaxation. We're gonna be back talking about

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>all of that. Obviously a lot coming up, but in

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, I'm Michael Knowles. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to you by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack, a political

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>across the country. In twenty twenty two, Jobs Freedom and

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Security Pack plans to donate to conservative candidates running for

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.