WEBVTT - Surveillance: Return Of Travel With Ryanair CEO

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloombergs Surveillance Podcast Hometown Keene. Along with

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the Jonathan Feral and Lisa Brownwitz. Jaylie, we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Johnson something else. And if you're talking to friends and family,

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking about other things through the summer too. Absolutely,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody's trying to figure out exactly how they're going to

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>get away for some sort of a vacation holiday throughout

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the summer, John, And it's interesting you listen to what

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the CDC is saying, and it's a similar thing over

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>here in the UK as well. The scientists incredibly cautious

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>about traveling. Certainly here in the UK, that is the narrative,

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but John, investors just don't see it that way. Bring

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>up the chart of Ryanair from the beginning of we're

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the same levels that we came in to at.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Basically the stock has completely rebound I did, as you

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>can see during that period. Actually we're up by seven

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent, So investors certainly see a reopening.

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>As you pointed out with Lisa just before the break,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility though in the stock over the

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>last few days as we've seen the equivocation from the

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>UK and the case counts climbing within the EU, the

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>health situation getting worse and worse. UM, let's bring in

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael O'Leary, he's the Ryanair CEO to talk about this. Michael,

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>good morning. You were talking about the idea on a

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>call a little earlier on that you're gonna be flying

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>eight of the schedule that you would normally fly kind

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of July to September. What's your degree of confidence in

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that number? Yeah, good morning, Guide my John think there's

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>a reasonably hydree of campers at this point in time

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that short order flying with significantly recover. I think through

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the peak summer months of July, August and September. That's

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>drum amount the success of the vaccine program in the

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>UK fifty percent of the UK population that has now

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>been vaccinated by the end of May, that would be

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>an easy percent. Europe will catch up. I can go

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>over that period of time with think of the UK

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>adult population with actually by the end of May they

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>say seventy by the end of June, and then I

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>think you will see a pretty rapid recovery of short

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>haul holiday travel between the UK and the European Union

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>through the summer. Already, the Portuguese, the Spanish, the Greek

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Cypriot governments have said they're going to welcome

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated UK travelers from the seventeenth of May onwards. So

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's still certain, but I think there's a

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>reasonable grounds for optimism that once the school holidays arrived June, July, August,

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that we will see I think quite significant recovery of

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>shorthold travel within Europe. You won't see longhold recover this summer,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but again, a lot of people who would normally have

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>gone long hold for their holidays to the States or

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to Asia will holiday at home in Europe. But we

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>think Ryan there will be the beneficiary of that. You

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>sound confidence, you think it's going to happen later on

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>in the year, but but the date keeps getting pushed

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to the rights and certain the noises out of the

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>UK over the last few days have been less than optimistic. Michael,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you said this morning that that you could survive if

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a summer season. My question to you

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is how. But we're very strong balance sheet. You know,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting on more than three and a half billion

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of cash At the moment, we have a very small

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>cash outflow. Most of our aircraft are grounded at the moment,

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>most of our plastic cameracrew are on furlough, paced schemes, etcetera.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So we can survive. We don't want to survive. We

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>do want to see people return to travel. And I

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>would put the question back to those UK governments if,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>as the UK government has you vaccinatedent of the adult

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>population by the end of May, why are you restricting

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>their movement? You know they are there are very little risk.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the one thing we know from the vaccines,

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the experience in Israel and in other countries essay, as

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you begin to vaccinate large proportions of the population, the

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>risk of serious illness, the risk of hospitalizations, and the

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>risk of death fatalities almost collapses, certainly falls to very

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>low levels. Now we're only locking up at the moment

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not to limit the spread of cod it, but actually

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate the risk that COVID cases will overwhelm the

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hospital service and health systems which beliminate that risk with vaccinations. Frankly,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think people are going to rebel. They're not good

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to be willing to be locked up. Those kids are

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to stay home from school. Life will return

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to normal, and I think COVID will be comm I mean,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it will still be with us, but it would be

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>much more. I think similar to the annual flu, the

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>annual cold. Because of the success and vaccinations. Well, Michael,

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as you know, they might rebel, but right now it's

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>illegal to go on holiday. So and still that's lifted.

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got a problem. So my question to you would

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be how hard are you lobbying on a vaccine passport

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>issue and how close our way to a breakthrough? Well,

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as you know, Johnason league to drive over

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the speed limit, but lots of people do it too.

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, again you're telling me that your summer is

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>reliant upon people rebelling and getting on the plane and

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking the law. No, I mean I was going to

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>move on to say, you know, sure, be long hole

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>travel will be much more restricted, but you have free

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.119
<v Speaker 1>movement of Pepe within the European Union and in large

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>amation between the UK and Europe as well. Now I

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's finding a time to get to the end

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of mayor in the June. You have all of the

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>high risk categories, the elderly, the obese, the infirm have

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>been vaccinated. Eighty percent of the annual population have been vaccinated.

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>The children had a lower rate of catching code, but

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>don't suffer serious illness anyway. What would be the base

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on with UK governments would be finding people moving around Europe,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>where by we're intacted to the free movement of people,

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so again, be careful. I think short Hauld domestically within

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the US will be there will be the very few

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>restrictions this summer, and short Hall, I would say within

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the European unions there would be very few restrictions. Michael,

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>long Hole will continue to be restrictions. Yes, guys, Sorry Michael.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You're clearly focused on the summer season, which is going

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the holiday for the kids. But nevertheless, short

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Hole is driven by younger demographics and they are going

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the last to get the vaccines. Is that

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be a problem. No, I mean again, a

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>summer holidays tend to be driven by families. You know,

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the school holidays across eurotypically start through June, July August.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>That's when the schools are off, That's when families are moving.

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>The young people are generally working at that point in time, generally,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully in the hospitality of jurism industry. I think that's

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>what we'll drive the recovery. And then, you know, everybody

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>predicts that Europe will be a washed with drag scenes

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>through May June July, and we're not about sure what

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the date will actually be. And I do accept that

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the date has moved backwards, but we still see that

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>there's sufficient time and sufficient vaccination room left run. You know,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we still have April, May and June to go to

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>allow us to recover the holiday season in Europe through

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>July Augus and the general Michael, let's make some producers nervous.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got forty five seconds left play with me, just

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. Chancellor Miracle says she's made a mistake,

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>just backing down from that East of lockdown. Your response

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to that this morning, I mean, I try not to

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>respond to the instantaneous comments of politicians. We're planning. We

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>announced new rooms this morning from the UK for the

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>European Peak. We extract to run most of the changes

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>through July over September, where reason to be content with

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of overlook. Michael, comeback soon, stay close it's

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>always greater catch Larry. Good to see you, sir, Ryan

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>s CEO greased to say we can head down to

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington now to catch up with Congressman Don Buyer, Democrat

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>from Virginia and chair of the Joint Economic Committee. Congressman,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up with you, sir. I want to

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>stablish as the last twenty four hours of we can,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>there was supposed to be a hearing just to go

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>through some of the priorities for a bipartisan infrastructure proposal,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>which Republicans didn't want to take part in. And I

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>want to read a quote from Republican Kevin Brady who

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>said the following. In our view, today's hearing is nothing

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>more than another partisan exercise so the Democrat House leadership

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>can set up yet another multi trillion dollar, one sided

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>spending bill. Congressman, can you tell us why it's more

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>sincere than that. I was really disappointed in Ranking Member

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Brady's comments because it didn't seem to have any connection

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to reality. We invited all the Democrats and all the

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to come tell us what their priorities should be

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in this next infrastructure bill, and I think Kevin Brady

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>knows that there are many Democrats, including me, that hope

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that this bill is mostly are largely paid for. So

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, this is a once in a

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>generation infrastructure bill that we love to have everybody's input for.

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it's gonna affect all those Republican districts

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to it early major ways. Let's talk about what's happened

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>previously in the last couple of months. Do you think

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they have been conditioned by the approach to the one

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>point nine trillion dollar bill where many Republicans found totally

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>frozen out of the process. Yeah, although I kind I

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think they were frozen out of the process. There

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>were extensive markups on this. You know that the most

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>controversial part for them was the four dollars which came

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>from their president, Donald Trump. And by the way, is

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>affecting all their folks. We have the there's a big piece.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>They were against the state and local government funding. The

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>best of my knowledge, no Republican governor, Republican or has

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>refused to accept these funds to strengthen their communities. It

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>was again, it was a wildly popular bill, is a

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>wildly popular bill among all Americans, including Republican Americans. Just

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not their elected officials in Washington, Congressman, you said that

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they were presented with a bill that was mostly or

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>largely paid for, But isn't that the issue? The way

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's being paid for through tax hikes on wealthier

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>individuals and on corporations is something that Republicans have said

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is a no go for them, that they don't want

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to do. How are you going to reconcile that issue? Well, yeah,

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how we're going to reconcile, and I

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>think we just have to come after with the facts.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>At least we did a hearing before the pandemic on

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in ways of means, we're virtually every Democrat and

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans said we need to have a way to pay

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for this and needs to be sustainable. Well, we know

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that the gas tax is a is a no starter

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>for many different reasons. But we also saw yesterday that

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>US corporate affective tax rate last year was seven point

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>eight percent after the j c T A that had

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the top one percent had their networth increased by four

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars or or just the New York Times editorial

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday about how you know personal income is almost

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>all reported in tax but a huge part of business

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>income is not to the tune of six fifty billion

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars or one point six trillion dollars a year I

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think was the New York Times number. There's a lot

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of low hanging for it out there that wouldn't affect

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Congressmen, and these are points that are widely

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>accepted among Democrats. However, there are Republicans that come back

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and they say, look, you're going to prevent a certain

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of dynamism investment in things like infrastructure just by

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the corporations themselves if they have to pay higher taxes.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And we can debate that till the cows come home.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But the question really here is is there any wiggle

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>room to negotiate and higher taxes with Republicans or is

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it going to have to be done without any of

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>their support. Well, I wish there were wiggle room. I

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>think one place Lisa that might be fruitful is looking

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at carbon pricing. And now that the American Patroleum Institute,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>along with Exxon Mobile and others, and the Business round

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Table and the Use Chamber, we've all said that carbon

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pricing should be on the table, maybe we can get

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to do that and at a minimum pay for

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, the roads and bridges and asphalt and stuff

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that they really like. In conversement, what do you think

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate approach now is then? Do you think it

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is a series of smaller bills or still one launch bill? Jonathan?

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I prefer one large bill, But I'm a I'm agnostic

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes to get the job done. I know

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>drifting around is the idea that you take things you

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>could get Republicans on board with, like highways and roads, bridges,

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and do that with their votes, and then the other

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>more controversial things. Although why odd band and electrical grid

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>modernization should be controversial? Uh, you may have to do

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that through through reconciliation. You are one other bite at

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the reconciliation apple this year Congress. Before we let you go,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about bitcoin. We've got Tesla

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>now accepting bitcoin is a form of payment. What's the

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>regulatory front when it comes to that crypto asset, Lisa,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We're about to dive into that deeply. I think there

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>needs to be when you get a completely unregulated currency.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>While it's exciting and interesting, um, the possibilities for yeah,

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody from terrorists to to uh international mafia type things

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>using it or people just avoiding taxes on a large

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>scale are very real. So I can't tell you what

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the regulation is going to be, but it's worth very

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 1>deep dives this year by congress A. Comressman. If I

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>shout walks, do we create some trouble there in your house?

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>The duck out? He really does want to go outside?

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You I can tell. Let you go, sir, Congressman. It's

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>good to see you. Stay close. It's going to catch up.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Congressman's on via there, Virginia. Thank you. Let's turn to

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Mind Mahajan, now the Nsclobe and Investors US investment strategist.

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>She joins, US might a great to catch up. As

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you've said, we started to see some fatigue in the

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>big winners through the last year, going back to late

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>October as well. I'm trying to understand how you approach

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>your market like this one right now, huge rip since

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of October, you start to see fatigue. How

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>do you approach what you see on the screen. Yeah. Absolutely, Look,

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been a phenomenal market since really last

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>March of UM this year one has really been a

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>story of the reopening trade, that value trade, the rotation

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>into value into the reopening stories, and out of really

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that growth in some of those large cap COVID winners

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from last year. Of course, over the last few days

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>you've seen a bit of reversal of that because rates

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have started to come down a little. Maybe there's some

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>questions around the reopening, given new of variants, given news

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of some states seeing rising cases, clearly given what's happening

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, so we're starting to see a little bit

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of pause around that reopening value cyclical trade. Um what

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about, of course is as we're heading to

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>this summer of really that real unleashing of pent up

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>demand by the consumer and perhaps the real unleashing of

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus really flowing through the system, we may see

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this value cyclical rally have one more leg or maybe

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>some legs through the summer. But what we're really thinking

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about then towards the second half of this year are

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the risks on the horizon, and those include one,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, peak reopening. At some point you're going to

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>get a peak growth rate. Maybe it's two q maybe

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's three q UM, but that at that point the

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>second relative starts to to slow again in terms of

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth. The second, of course is we do think

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that yields have you know, can continue to grind higher. UM.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>We do think that the two handle on the tenure

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is feasible this year, and so that will cause some

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>additional volatility and pressure. And then finally and thirdly of course,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is a FED who has been quite accommodated thus far.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>We think that continues for most of this year, but

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point they're going to have to come off

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this crisis level accommodation that they've been writing. So this

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was really rates at the zero bound unlimited queue to

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>some extent to really help at the heart of the pandemic.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>We're now clearly trying to re emerge from that. So,

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, some things you're thinking about. A lot of

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the good news, a lot of the reopening story, a

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of this value trade is starting to get priced

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in UM. So keep in mind, if you haven't yet,

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you do have an opportunity to to you know, tactically

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>layer in sencyclicality, but just be mindful. Then as you're

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>heading towards the second half of the here money you've

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>gone through a lot of issues there. Everyone's got their

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>own approach, their own process to work through. A lot

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of people talk about where we are in the cycle.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The early trade is the early cycle playbook still with us?

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to last another few months, maybe another

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>quarter or another few quarters? Morgan Stanley think we've already

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>seen the early cycle move. Do you use the same

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>approach Mona? Do you have that early cycle playbook? And

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>when the cycle do you think were on this market? Yeah? Absolutely,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we are re emerging from a recessionary environment.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And of course this recession is is different from some

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of the others, which are more you know, rates driven

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>or more consumer driven. This was a pandemic and a

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>health crisis, but we're clearly re emerging from it, and

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that that playbook actually came to fruition in a very

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>real way this year. So certainly areas like energy, financials, industrial,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>specilical stocks, the reopening place, uh, those all took a

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>nice light higher and so a lot of you know,

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what they call the easy money perhaps has been made.

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, you know, we do think that

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>um the earnings growth environment, there's still upside to some

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers that we're seeing at there especially on UM.

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Some of these sectors like financials, like energy, like industrials,

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the areas that do well as rates continue

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to grind higher. Of course, financials, especially with a steeper

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>year field curve. UM. We think areas like industrials may

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have some legs given the infrastructure package that we think

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>will start to come to the forefront in the weeks ahead.

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Even areas like clean energy, which has been a real

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>focus of the Biden administration and has now sold off

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>as the NAZAC has sold off. As a lot of

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the growth stories have sold off, UM could have another lead.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.719
<v Speaker 1>We think that's a secular growth theme that that if

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you haven't yet had explored, which was it's an interesting

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>one here. So UM certainly we're looking at it more

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>from now, a more active approach, taking a sector you know,

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>by sector positioning approach rather than a broad market approach.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, you know, at this point in

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, after we've had this reopening rally, we have

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to really be more selective going forward. Just to be clear, Mona,

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is the reopening rally done. If we reached a plateau

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're just going to fluctuate from here, is that

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, you know, I think that that there

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is one like higher and you know, if you think

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>about seasonality, sometimes it's sell in May and go away,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.239
<v Speaker 1>but generally this year, I think, um, you know, when

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 1>you look anecdotally, those summer months are really when we're

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see um, that pent up demand on leach.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the consumers will hopefully have the next

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>round of stimulus checks in their pockets. Uh, the vaccination

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>program here in the US will be more fully rolled out,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and so you'll really see them that demand for areas

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>like travel like um, you know, going back indoors, perhaps

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>even two restaurants, going to sporting events. And so I

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think that when when the economy really is going through

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that hyper demand phase, we'll see the market actually react

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to that. But that's when you have to start thinking about, well,

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>after that, what happens are we at peak reopening? And

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think, you know, you probably have a little

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of steam left in this rally, um, but it's

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's probably time to start thinking about being a little

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more neutral or cautious as we had passed the

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>summer months. You used one line in this conversation that

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>always pops out jumps out to me when people say

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the easy money monitor, and you know I always pick

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>up on it, so forgive me for doing so. Did

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it ever feel easy? You know? Ever since March of

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>last year, it's felt a little bit tough, and so

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know that the whole dichotomy between Main

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Street and Wall Street has always been a tough point

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to to follow. But I certainly think in this case,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the markets have been very forward looking, and perhaps they

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>were really since last year looking towards the second half

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of one, and so they were very astute in realizing

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that at some point we will have a program in

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>place that will help us get through the pandemic to

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>reopen fully um And and interestingly, the retail investor last

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>year played a very large role in that. So you know,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the util investor in some way was the winner in

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>really kind of kept you know, kept that optimistic outlook

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>throughout the year, and so they really benefited from that. So, yes,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>we've had an optimistic reopening trade, you could argue since

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps March April of last year. So hopefully, you know,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>most investors participated in some way, and that the good

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>news was last year, if you had the growth stocks

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>um this year you could actually have some opportunities in

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the value stocks, and so that's why we think there

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>is still a little bit more catch up and perhaps

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more rebound to to go in that sector.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>If you think about a lot of these value names

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>like financials, energy industrials, they are still slightly up to

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>March of last year, and so they have some catch

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>up to do to the NAZAC, which is up from

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>its February highs. So UM interesting markets still one where

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, again you know, just be selective, be active,

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>but you still have some opportunities to go. It's never

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>easy catch up, you know, it's never exactly. Aliance Global

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Investors US investment strategist, let's bring in Toasten Slock, Apollo

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Global Management chief economist, Torsten. You've seen your old colleagues,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>your old peers put out their forecast for growth for

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>GDP for one six handles, seven handles, big numbers. Can

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>we just start with the deceleration you anticipate from twenty

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>one to twenty two and beyond absolutely, John that I

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>think that the number we just got is a very

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>important data point because it does to us that it

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>is premature to talk about overheating. We have seen, of

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>course the reopening trade do will. But as j Pal

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>has said yesterday and he's probably sure you're also going

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 1>to say today, is that we are still almost tenderent

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>jobs behind creatives that we were in total employment in

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>February of two thousands winning. So the bottom line is

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that we will have a very strong growth numbers over

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the next few quarters as the reopening begins to play out,

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>as the fiscal stimulus supports, and also both households and

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>corporates have a lot of cash on the energies that

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to spend. So these three tail winds will

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>give quite a boost to GDP growth. But the key

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>word here, as you're saying, Jonathan, is the deceleration and

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>growth is important. Naming for marketing becomes critical to figure

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 1>out the timing and when is the peak and growth,

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and we will begin to see the numbers begin to

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>slow down. We often speak as growth and inflation sort

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.239
<v Speaker 1>of in tandem, and yet there are distinct aspects of

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this economy. Could we see a situation where we have

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>very robust growth and inflation that still remains within the

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>range that the FED is expecting, which is pretty low. Absolutely.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a number of one all factors, including

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>base effects, commodity prices. You also have some health pricing

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>issues that go into inflation and all those things. It

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>really is correct what the Pole is saying. It is

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>all temporary. And for the FT to think about inflation,

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>they always keep on emphasizing it has to be persistent.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>It has to really be a situation where the whole

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>economy is boiling over where the overheating really is very

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>significant everywhere, and we're just nowhere near that point. At

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this stage, it is clear that we will have strong growth,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So okay, we can start talking about that, but why

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>don't we create the tabulart jobs first that we have

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>behind red Tip Toper of two thousand twenty. Then we

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>can have a discussion about persistent inflation problems. And that's

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely not this year towards. And there are a lot

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of strong man arguments being made against the nineteen seventies

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>type of inflation and how we're not going to see that.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That seems likely that we're not going to go back

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to that kind of rapid inflation nary environment. However, there

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>is this idea that not only have we printed all

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this money that's about to be unleashed into the economy

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>when people can go out and spend more aggressively. But

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>there are also are these supply chain kinks. We have

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>people companies bringing supply chains back home. These are all

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>frictions as China gets less of a dominant place in

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the global important export field, these are all frictions that

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>could add to inflation. How do you account for that?

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely correct. But if you think about transportation costs,

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>even if you think about commodity prices more generally, how

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>big a share is that of total costs for companies?

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as a starting point, about two thirds of

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>cost for companies is labor. So that's the first a

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>discussion about if you really want an overheating economy, you

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>really need to see much more awkward pressure on wages,

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and that you will not have that in a situation

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>where the labor market still is again about tenderland jobs behind.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Now you could say that if you look at the

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>n f I B, there are some signs that the

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>small businesses are saying that the biggest problem out is

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that they can't find the right workers. They can't find

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the right quality of labor. So there could be some

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>pieces of evidence that maybe in some corners of the

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>labor market you could have some weight to pressure. But

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>very broadly, speaking to your question, Leaser, it is true that, yes,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there are some problems in the supply chain, and there's

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly some issues that could live things in, particularly because

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of commodity prizes, But the biggest scheme of things you

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think about the total cost base for corporate America, it

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is still the case that commodity prizes and supply chain

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>issues are still a relatively modest amount of problems are

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>compared to at least some of the other things that

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to see to have a nowhere here. So Toasting,

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about labor. If this was two thousand and

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>nine and we were talking about ten million jobs short,

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a problem, and we did have a problem,

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and it took a long long time to recover from that.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But this is not two thousand and nine. This is

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>one and companies of shot because of policy by decision,

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>governments are telling them they've got to stay shut in

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>certain parts of the world, particularly at Sound of America

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment in Europe. So but that in mind, Toasting,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I just how relevant that ten million number is it's

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly relevant if you are one of them. It's a struggle,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and we've talked about the pain in this labor market

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. But where the optimistic tone and the hope

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>comes from is that as soon as you take these

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>restrictions off, a lot of that's gonna come back and

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>come back quickly. So when we wake up in a

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>summer toss and I want to understand from your perspective

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly where we are in this cycle, because it's not

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be the same as what we saw coming

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>out of OH nine. You're right, I mean, in some

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sense say that the energy is that we turn off

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the lights, and the question is can the lights just

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to be turned on now? Can we just restart their

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>simply lines can get the smoke out of the chimneys

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of the factories that have been on hold while we

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>have been in the pandemic. The issue here is, if

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about this in practical terms, you need to

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>get airline capacity back to where it was before. You

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>need to get people to stay at hotels, used to

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>get people who go to restaurants. You need to get

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>people to go to sporting events, concerts, or their face

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to face consumer services industries. It's a little bit difficult

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>to just see that as we're just turning off and

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>turning on the switch here again and say well, now

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone just go out and do these things. I still

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>think it will take some time before those things get

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>back to the levels where we were in February of

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousands twenty. But you're right, the upside risk could

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>being that employment comes back fast. But still ten million

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty pretty big number when you think about

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>where we are today. So I think Jay Powell and

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the message will get from him again today Je Paul

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>will say and continue to emphasize, yes, yes, it's true

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>that there are some very significant TiAl wins here. But

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then why do we wait a little bit longer before

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we take the champagne bottle out and celebrate and say

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that now we have declared victory over I maybe it

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>is going to take quite some time still before we

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>get to the point of full employment. Or Jane Jillen

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday, we'll probably have to get least into next

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>year before we get back to full employment in the economy. Again,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this phrase tost and let's just finish on this phrase

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>full employment. We hear it so much from economists, from you,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>from others too. I talk about it as well. I

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what it means anymore, torst them. What

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>does it mean for you? What are you looking for?

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>What's the data point that says, sure, we're that we've

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>made it? Yes, so that's right. So that's why I'm

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>watching the dots in the dot from the FAT podcast

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that it be the summer if you can projections is

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>quite important, at least as a guide post for saying, hey,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe we had difficulties in markets quantifying this, but at

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>least what is the FATS saying is the unemployer rate

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that we need to get down to, And they're saying

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that they we need to get down to an employre

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>rate more close to around fall if we get a

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>fall handle, and then we may begin to see more

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>upper pressure on wages and therefore, in their view, also

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>more upper pressure on inflation. And given where we are

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>now with an employing rate today of more than six,

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we still have quite a ways to go. But you're right, Jonathan,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it could also be that some parts of the label

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>market could be a bit stronger. But it is critical

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this question of how far we are away from full employment.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's pretty clear that and this is again what

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Yellen was saying yesterday, then we're probably not going to

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get to full employment in two thousand twenty one. They

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>toast and gonna catch out, Gonna see you. Important conversation,

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>No doubt, we'll have another one very soon, Toasting Slot

0:27:51.119 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Apollo Global Management, Chief Economists A teen museums successful because

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid three afternoons at a five after school.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>If I wasn't doing something else, I was in a

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>museum looking at things, and I love museums, and I

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make it a greatly greater and greater. That

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>was Leonard A. Lauder. He is est A Lauder Chairman

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>emeritus as well as the former chief executive officer and

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>also the son of a number of the two people

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>who founded this company, David Rubinstein Uh. He interviewed him

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>on a Peer to Peer Conversations that set to air

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming days. David Rubinstein joining us now the

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>host of Peer to Peer Conversations as well as uh

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Carlisle Group joining us here, David Fantastic

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Rags to Riches Story, one of the most storied makeup

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>companies in the United states Esta Lauder. What was the

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest standout message from this interview. Well, the company started

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>very modestly. We now know it as a spectacular company.

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And Leonard Louder often has said, well, you join your

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>mother's big company, Esta Lauder. But actually when he joined

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it was at eight hundred thousand of revenue, so it

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was a modest company, and he really helped build it.

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>He made his mother into the face of the company.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>She wasn't the business person per se. That was Leonard

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and he really did an incredible job of building into

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the most successful companies in the country. I

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about the modest inception of this company

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to where it is now, you asked him about a

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>modern entrepreneur trying to get into the game in the

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>same kind of way and launching a brand. What was

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>his insight and how things have changed now versus then.

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It's more competition harder in those days. Uh, it was

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>easier to kind of sneak up on competition. But he

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>had a big competitor named Charles Revson who built Revlon

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and Revlon was the eight hundred pound gerrilla then and

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Revlon once tried to buy Esta Lauder for a million

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars um and his mother ultimately decided not to do it.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Had they done so, we wouldn't have heard of est

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Lauder probably, But it shows you can overcome gigantic UH

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>competitors if you're really persistent and really smart and and

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Leonard was. Leonard really was the genius behind this branding

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of a company, and the business of the company's mother

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was a terrific symbol though, of a company. I feel

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>like we can't talk to corporate leaders right now without

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the pandemic and how it's affected their business

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and the way they operate in offices and beyond. How

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>has the idea that people are working from home and

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't socializing as much affected the landscape for a makeup company.

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>That has to do with perception. I mean, has it

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>been enhanced through the ideas of Instagram or has it

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>been taken away from just because people are not going

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>out and being with their friends as much. Well, I

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>think people are putting makeup on when I go do

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>their zoom calls and other things, so I don't think

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it's adversely affected UH the industry completely, but but surely

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>when people are not doing as much socializing as before,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It's probably not as as favorable, but I do think

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the company has incredible brand and it now has something

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like twenty eight different brands. It just Estate Lauder is

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the main brand, the name of the company, but they

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have bought many other brands over the years and built

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>some like Finigue, for example. So since you yourself are

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>co chair and co founder of Carlisle Group, I do

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you about the pandemic and how it's

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>affected some of the morale. We've heard from city groups

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Jane Fraser about how they plan to boost morale for

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that have Zoom, for individuals that have Zoom burnout,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and we are from another group of Wall Street firms

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're come there there. Their employees are struggling

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>at home after working with kids, after having a very

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>little break between home and work. What's your response to

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that and how much have you observed this zoom fatigue

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>among your employees. I think zoom fatigue is everywhere. It's

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>been over a year now and I've been living essentially

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in this house for about a year, house that I've

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>lived in for thirty some years, but I hadn't really

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>spent much time and it compared to the last year.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that ultimately the businesses that are

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>right of distuildings will go back. I doubt though, that

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>people will go back and work five days a week,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten hours a day in their office. I

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>think people will increasingly want to spend some time working remotely,

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's not a bad idea. Like I

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>do believe that people would like to get back to

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>work when they believe it's safe and they have to

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>make certain that there's not going to be any chance

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of catching a virus. But I think it's going to

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>take another six before that happens. Have you observed, though,

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that that productivity is starting to decrease around the edges

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>among employees who are struggling with this work home balance

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that has gotten up ended by the pandemic. Well, in

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the private equity world, it's hard to say that because

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the private equity world has adopted to zoom quite well,

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've been doing deals, raising money and exiting deals

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>at a quite good pace, so I can't say that

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>productivity has gone down. I do think everybody would like

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to get back to is what has used to be

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>considered normal. But I do think that normal in the

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>future will consider it will be considered to have have

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>some work unremotely. I don't think people will travel as

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>much as they used to. Um I used to fly

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>halfway around the world for an hour meeting, and I

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think that people like me will do that again.

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 1>That's actually been a debate that we've been harping on

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning, the idea of business travel returning and how much.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And my colleague John Farrow made a really good point

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that if if I can bring you a bottle of

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>wine and see you face to face, I'm more likely

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to win the deal versus not. So business travel will return.

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Where will it return and where won't it return? From

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>your perspective in your world, David, I think travel that

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is global, where you have to travel halfway around the

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>world for a meeting, that will be slow to come back.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But if it's going from Washington, New York, or New

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>York to Boston or Philadelphia, New York, that's relatively easier

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. So I think shorter distances will probably still

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of meetings, But if you have to

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>travel an enormous long time to get somewhere, that will

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be harder to get done. I do think that will

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>be some of that, for sure, some businesses require you

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that, but I do think it will come

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>back more slowly than than we would like. Just going

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>forward right now at the theme of the morning has

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>been peak optimism, peak reopening, and we have felt that

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the forward action of the earnings that

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we are going to see has already been priced into

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the markets. From your vantage point, as far as deals

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>getting done, do you see things starting to slow as

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>people believe that the window is kind of up for

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of peak perfection in markets as the economy now

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has to catch up. Well. Predicting what's going to happen

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the market's always a dangerous kind of uh undertaking.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.479
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that as long as interest rates

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>stay low, I do think that you'll see a fair

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>amount of deal is getting done. And I don't think

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I've see a real slowdown. I do think that the

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>spack market probably has slowed down a little bit of late.

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it has been very robust. It couldn't keep

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>going on at that pace forever, and I do think

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some spack prices have come down, But generally, I think

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>SPACs are probably here to stay for a while. At

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>least at some level. I do think that the financing

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>markets are still relatively robust and and I don't think

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown is imminent, in large part because the one

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>nine trillion dollar stimules Phil is going to keep the

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>economy in reasonable shape for a while. David Rubinstein, thank

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us, and the interview

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is phenomenal. I recommend that everybody watch it. That was

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>David Rubinstein, coach, hair and co founder of the Carlisle Group,

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as the host of peer to peer conversations.

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple, podcast, SoundCloud,

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene and this is Bloomberg