WEBVTT - Summer Driving Season Will Pump Oil Prices Until Fall: Schenker

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Now

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>let's turn our attention to Jason Shanker. He is the

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>president and the founder of Prestige Economics. He's also a

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg prophet. He's based in Austin, Texas, currently at the

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta FEDS Financial Markets Conference in Emilia Island, and you

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>can follow Jason on Twitter at Prestige e con. Uh. Jason,

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>where you caught on the back foot by the rise

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in oil prices? No, we've had an expectation that we

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>would see oil prices rise through the driving season. You know,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate we saw it in Friday's report, you know,

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the lowest we've seen since December two thousand. Strong labor

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>market means we're going to see very strong driving demand

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that summer. Uh. The OPEC risks on top the Iranian

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>risks of sanctions on top. That just adds fuel to

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a fire that we already expected would be burning. Because

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the U s summer driving season is one of the

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest factors for oil prices during the year seasonally. So

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to get a sense of how much is

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>being baked in about the US withdrawing from the Iran packed.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>If the US does go ahead and withdraw from the

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>nuclear agreement, do you think the oil prices could rise

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>much more from here? Well, I think they could. I

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's priced in at all. Um. You know,

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the technicals and fundamentals that we've seen in the market.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're but we watched the thirty day on

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the hundred day moving averages. We've been above those now

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit. Um. We're above other critical supports,

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>these facts as were already supportive of prices. And you know,

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>while we're seeing a little bit more upside today, and

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see quite a bit more

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. If we pull out of those that agreement

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with a run, you know, we could see five dollars,

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars, You could see a spike even higher than that.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it'd be sustained. And I think once

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we get past the driving season, I think there's downside

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>risks from higher interest rates, and if the trade UH

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>factors remain in play, then there's still going to be

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>downstairs there. But we see the sort of bifurcated dynamic

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of upside through the driving season. This produces more upside,

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>but then in the fall more downside. Jason, how much

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is this increase in prices really tied to, let's say,

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the back and forth between the strength of the US dollar.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Not much. I think that really if we look, the

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest fundamental driver for oil, like all commodities, is that

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they're bought and not sold. The global economy has been

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>doing quite well, and despite what we've seen in industrial

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>medals for those have been a weaker again, those seasonal

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>dynamics for oil demand. Right now in the spring where

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we're trading driving season contracts with binaries are ramping up production.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a time when you see oil prices rise

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>typically anyway, and now you've got a bit of a

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>pressure cooker because these geopolitical risks. So I'm trying to

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>figure out right now. It seems like last year people

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>were saying oil is never gonna get above fifty dollars

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in barrel, perhaps get to sixty dollars of barrel. Now

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we're at seventy dollars of barrel. How much of this

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is being driven by the fact that Saudi Arabia really

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to hit that eighty dollars of barrel mark for

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi aramco I p O possibly to happen next year. Yeah,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I've seen as eighty dollars thrown around. Whether that's there

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, their actual explicit target or not that their

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>explicit target was to push oil inventories to a five

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>year towards the five year average range. That's been the

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>goal of Opecanano PECK members. It's been clear. Something we've

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>talked to our clients about is that Saudi Arabia is

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>priori ties in balance sheet over income statement. Right, That's

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing, will sacrifice selling your fewer barrels now

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to increase the valuation of our business. That's

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>very clear. Um upside risk. We've been assessing the price

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>risk this summer. We would see in the sixty dollar

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>range with potential spikes to eighty. That's something we were

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>talking to clients about in December as a risk for

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the summer, so that definitely becomes a more material risk

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>now with the geo political situation. That doesn't mean it

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>will be sustained because the trade risks, global growth and

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>interest rates will determine what happens once we get past

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this summer. But for now, best job market. You know

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen years you're gonna see a lot of people

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on the road and families driving down from Chicago to

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Disneyland or the Disney World. Are the kinds of things

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that you see driving whale prices in the summer and

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>driving a lot of other bills too. If you're going

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to Disney World. Just saying I want to get I

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to get a sense of what

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you think of shale drillers and and the prospect of

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>them really ramping up production in response to the higher price,

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they're basically going to offset some of the

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>demand with just more output. What do you think is

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of that? Well, I think there's a couple of things

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know you still have. On the one hand,

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>these folks they're looking at the curve, they know the

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>seasonalities of pricing, and if they're making the drilling decisions,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know they're still going to have to understand and

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they deal with those dynamics. So I think that you're

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>going to see more production, but you know, one bit

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and twice shy, I think you're gonna see um still

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>some of this holding back. And I'd say that for

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the funds that are out there to discussion, there's a

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of money on the sidelines. There have been very

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>large funds that have been raised in the last couple

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of years. I'm in Texas. I've been talking to a

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of these folks for the last year or so,

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and they they're still looking for distressed assets. I gotta

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you, seventy bucks of barrel looking for sweetheart deals

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with the stressed assets. If that's your mandate, that's going

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a pretty tough, tough fine for you. Jason,

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just quickly, what's the best way for investors to profit

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>from this rise in oil prices? Well, you know, I

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>think if folks want exposure, then they need to be

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at companies that are producing oil. Um. They also

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>may want to be thinking about the the underlying commodity

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>as well that the price is likely to rise. Those

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are probably the areas where you're going to see people plays.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to thanks very much for joining us at

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Jason Schenker is the president and the founder of Prestige Economics.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>He's also a Bloomberg profit and you can follow Adjason

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at the Prestige e con. We want to

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>visit now in the world of real estate with Ken Wisenberg.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>He is a partner in charge of the real estate

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>services group for Eisner Amper and he joins us here

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studious Ken, thanks very much

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. The news today, of course, is

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>black Stone agreeing to buy Grammarcy Property Trust. The price

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tag is seven point six billion dollars. It's a fift

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>premium over the closing price on Friday. Why do you

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think they're making this move to buy Grammarscy Property Trust.

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the overall market for warehouse space UM,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's in high demand because of the increase in online

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>sales and in the next day or same day delivery

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>requirements that people are expecting. And uh, this is a

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>good entry for black Stone into this marketplace paying a

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>premium over the current prices, and prices for this kind

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of space have been up last year. The reat UM

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>warehouse reach space was up about six where the overall

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>read market was down about eight or nine and they

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a big bump um it reads from the

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump tax cuts yet, so this seems to be a

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>very good spot for them to go into. Uh, the

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>spaces and high demand. It will continue to be in

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>high demand for the same day delivery. And also um

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>other industrial uses are on the rise. Companies are bringing

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>operations back into the United States because of the repatriation

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>tax cut, and you'll see a increase in industrial activity

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States in general and warehouse in particular,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>so reads stating for real estate investment trusts. Just to

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>make that clear, last week, per Logus, the world's largest

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>warehouse owner, agreed to acquire DCT Industrial for nearly eight

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollars. So you are seeing the

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>consolidation in this space. Can you just talk a little

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>bit about what the differences between a warehouse and a

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>big box store, because frankly, I hear about how warehouse

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>space is in a real great demand, and then you

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hear about all these suffering malls and you think, well,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean put two and two together, just make the

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>malls into warehouses and you've got your demand sated. Well,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>warehouse space generally leases essentially less than retail space. When

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you look as you know, retail space would it be

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere depending where it is. So on Fifth Avenue, retail

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>spaces four or five thousan dollars a square foot. In

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the suburbs that might be you know, hundred dollars of foot,

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>but warehouse space in the suburbs is probably dollars a foot.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>So it's a huge difference in the square footage. And

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>also if you look at the parking arrangements UM and

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a big box store in the suburbs, there's a ton

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of parking UM at a warehouse there isn't. It's basically

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>space for trucks UM. So if they do convert an

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>existing big box store UM into warehouse, they have a

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of extra land available to build additional warehouse space

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on that property. It could be an interesting play well.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And then I guess there has to be some massive

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>realized loss if there is conversion of say a big

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>mall into a warehouse space just because of the smaller

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>price that they can charge. Right right, I don't see

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a large mall being converted to warehouse a arge mall

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>UM to the extent that it's going to be good

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>doing a redevelopment, will have entertainment, residential and office space

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>added to it. Um. You might see a reduction in

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the number of cars over the next ten years due

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to self driving automobiles. People will not need to have

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>their own cars and going through the mall will be

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, tapping your phone and a car will appear

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in your driveway. UM. So it's gonna be an interesting

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>um change over the next ten years in terms of technology. UM.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the malls are going through a repositioning and

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:36.479
<v Speaker 1>reimagining today which is really interesting. It's it's an experiential

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>development in malls, um, which I love that word. Uh.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And and if if you go down like in Florida

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is a really great example. So the Ball Harbor Mall

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was the classy mall. All of the major stores were there,

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're adding restaurants, adding pilates, class studios, palatine bike stores,

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. So it's an experience to go there because

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going to eat, you're going to exercise, you're going

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to to the to the movies right there. Um. And

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this good shopping and the you know, the best stores. Um.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's an experience as opposed to just I'm going

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to the store to buy address or pair of pants,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which you can now do online much easier, public versus private.

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Better to be a private real estate company these days.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>UM reads have not had UM huge uptick UM and

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised at that the new tax cuts really favorite

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>reads UM and come from a read is subject to

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>business exclusion UM, so that you're paying the twenty rate

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on read income UM general dividends or but the corporation

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>pays twenty one, so the effective right there is thirty

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>seven UM. So reads are really have a tax benefit

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and that hasn't been factored into their pricing. Why do

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that is, UM, I think it's complicated for

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>most people to understand. But you know, for analysts and stuff,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at it, and reads are valued based on

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the dividend payout UM and and net asset value. But

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really the people buying it because of the

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dividend stream UM. And if interest rates are going up

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and you get three on a ten year treasury and

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>three on a read, you're not going to pay as

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>much for the REAT. So I want to just ship

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>back to the idea of the warehouse space, and it's

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a it's a question that Pim raised before the segment

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>where he was saying, you know, are we seeing peak

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>valuations here? Just because we are seeing such premiums bid

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>up for these spaces at this time, you know, there's

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money waiting to be placed in the market.

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>The stock market is experiencing significant volatility over the last

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>um ten or eleven months. People look for safe investments

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>or safer investments that have a steady rate of return,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and real estate provides that. So you're seeing real estate

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>becoming a much more attractive investment when you look at

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the world in terms of real

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>estate UM affordable housing is in high demand UM housing

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in generalism and high demand. Hotels have been in high

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>demand UM. Office less so, retail much less so UM

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the warehouse because of the of the shift in consumer

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>behavior brought about by companies like Amazon, UM, you're seeing

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the darling of the of the investor real quick. Have

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we seen rates to rent out warehouse space go up recently? Yes,

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>how much significantly? I don't have the exact statistics, but

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's on the rise because demand is on the rise. Fascinating,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being with us. Kennt Weisenberg,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>partner in charge of the real estate services group for

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Eisner Amper in New York. We really appreciate you being here,

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>especially on a day when Blackstone is buying Grammar Seat

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Property Trust. This is the second multi billion taller takeover

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of a warehouse company is in just the past two

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks fastening Space. We will continue to keep tabs on

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it customized in souls using three D printing technology. How

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>is it done and what is the goal here? To

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>help us understand this new business adventure is Shamil Hargovin.

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>He is the co founder and the chief executive, along

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with Hannah Chakrits, the director of product and design for Weaves.

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That W I I V V. That's W double I

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>double V. Alright, Shamil tell us about we've and the

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>science behind custom made insuls. Hey, Pam, thank you, Yeah, We've.

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>We've effectively taken Meta Greate medical great scan technology, put

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it on a phone and we're able to now from

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the comfort of your living room, measure your feet or

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>other body parts and then run that through a system

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>where we customize the product designed for your body. We

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>buy mechanically enhance the product to serve your body, and

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>then ultimately use additive manufacturing in three D printing to

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>print the product in the United States and send it

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to your door. Chamil, Before we do anything else, we

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have to get something out of the way. You ran

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a marathon and flip flops? Is that right? I apologize

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that was our product engineer, Chris Bellomdia. Yes, okay, I'm

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>just making sure and he lived to see the other day.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a fascinating issue because this sort

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of raises a question. Is this the future where you

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>could just get a scan, have clothes or shoes manufactured

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>at a three D printing press that doesn't require that

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>many people there to do it, and then it gets

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>shipped right to you. Is that what we're going to see,

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>say in ten years from now. I'd say sooner than that,

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but yes, we're here. Um, we're starting with footwear, uh

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and and and products like orthotics and insoles. But it's

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of time before we get is smarter, quicker,

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes something increasingly cheaper for everyone to have.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So Hannah, come on in here, because I'm trying to

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out the actual process of the three D printing

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and how you figure how you make it work. Can

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you just give walk me through what happens once someone

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>submits a scan of their foot to the point when

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they get the product. Yeah. So it's actually a very

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>simple process. You download our app, you pick the product

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that you want, and then with just a few photos,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we digitally map your your feet and create a three

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>D model of the product that we're building, and then

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can send that to the three D printer, print the

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>product overnight, and get it to your door in under

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>ten days. So you don't own the three D printing press,

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we do you do? Okay? So you have a press. Uh,

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a manufacturing facility and San Diego Shamille. What

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>prevents other companies from coming in and doing exactly the

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>same thing? I mean, there are ways to buy orthotics

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>now you can have them custom molded, I guess to

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>your feet. But what prevents someone else from coming in

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>scanning someone's foot and using three D printing technology to

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>offer a competitor. Absolutely. Let's just set a really quick

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>piece of context. What's happening that's accelerating what we're doing

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for starters is we have scanning technologies and we've got

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the big players Apple, Intel, Microsoft, Google spending lots of

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>money there on the printing side, ge Hewlett Packard, Carbon

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>three D systems. What we are the leaders at is

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>taking that scan and converting it into a three D

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>printable file, and we do that in a matter of seconds. Uh.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's the really, that's the patents, that's the technology,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what we've continues to innovate in. Is it's almost

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>a machine learning meets computer vision meets customization algorithm s

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and so that that that's our core technology. That's hard

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to replicate. So I'm just trying to figure out the

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage to the consumer. Clearly, it's because if you do

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>have a custom fit based on your technology, that's an advantage.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>What about the cost, Hannah, The cost is affordable. But

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to touch on custom again. So the reason

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we do what we do is is not just because

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>custom is cool. We truly believe that custom fit products

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>will really impact how you move and you feel and

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you function on a day to day basis. So the

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Boston Marathon was an extreme example of that, where you

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>have a product that's customed to each of your feet, uh,

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>and it will impact how how you run, not just

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a marathon, but even how you walk to work, and

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>how you stand and how you can you know, feel

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>how your mood is during the day. So um our

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>goal is feel and function how you move and live

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>UM and you you'll be able to see our sandals

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for a very accessible price and our insuls from seventy nine.

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Shamille maybe speak a little bit about the actual library,

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the database of scanned images that you have, because doesn't

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that also make it possible for you to then customize

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it based on what you've done in the past. Absolutely

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that the data here is is the actual goal mine

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. We've has an extremely large repository footwear

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>data we've collected and we actually acquired through one of

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>our acquisitions in sixteen, was right, That's correct, yes, uh.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And the idea here is that the more data we have,

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>almost like you know, the search algorithms that the company

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is trying to bring AI into the world. Either more

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>data you have, the more you're able, uh to kind

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of get this right in terms of understanding the different

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>form factors and feet you're dealing with. And so this

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is very critical for our for our company and its longevity.

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting Thank you so much both of you for

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Chamil Hargovin, co founder and chief executive

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>officer of We've in Seattle, and Hannah Zachritz, director of

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>product and design for the company based in Vancouver, thank

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Really interesting and uh it makes me

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder what else will be able to be printed in

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 1>those three D printers. I've seen houses being printed. I

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder how much they'll be part of our We're not

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>going to help me in a marathon anyway. The Oracle

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of Omaha spoke and the world listened, and keep speaking

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and the world keeps listening. We're talking about the Berkshire

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Hathway Annual shareholder Meeting, which is ongoing. Joining us now

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is David Dead's founder, president, chief investment strategist at Point

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>View Wealth Management, overseeing about three million dollars in New Jersey. David,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. I want

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>to start first with the loss that Berkshire Hathaway reported

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>due to what they called punishing accounting changes. Can you

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just talk about what these are and whether we should

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to that. Yeah, Well, the bottom line is

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>people are not paying attention to that. Um Buffa is

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>always focused on, you know, economic potential and actual earnings

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on cash invested. These changes in accounting treatment have have

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>no impact on the value of his investment, on the

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>value of his businesses, and so I think it's widely

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that investors and others should disregard these one time

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>accounting issues. David diets rat poison. He talked about rat poison,

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't he? Well, uh, you know, there's a lot of

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>even more colorful language that was used um in Omaha

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday. Um, but uh, you know, depending on the topic,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but particularly Charlie Munger a man of few words, but

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they are certainly colorful words that were used to describe

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things, including his uh dislike of cryptocurrencies. Yeah,

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what Warren Buffett said, that bitcoin is is rat poison.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Did you find many people there who disagreed with them? Well,

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, not to make that word raised in the

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>hand to argue with him on that, But I think

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the more important thing really was his reasoning there. And

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it all goes back for Warren Buffet um and Charlie

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Munger on productivity. If you have an asset that can

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>do something for you, that can pay off income, that

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>can grow crops which can produce a profit. They're all

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for that. When you have assets like gold, like cryptocurrencies,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>which just kind of exists in trade hands, but at

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day they don't multiply, they're not fertile,

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>then he is very negative on that, and so he

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>analogy cryptocurrency. They both did to one of the biggest

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>investment the bacles that the world has ever seen, which

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was the trading of toolip bolts bulbs in the UH

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth century over in Amsterdam Um. And so the message

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>was quite clear, steer clear. He added to that in

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>some comments this morning when he asked, well, why is

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Goldman's Acts going to start trading them? And he said,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, I think some of the senior people at

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Goldman's Acts probably share the views I have. But you know,

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a market. The ducks are quacking, so you're gonna

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>make a market dry and makes the money off the activity.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett also had some colorful words for Elon Musk. Yeah, exactly, well,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess Elon Musk kind of started by

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>calling moat, which is one of the favorite terms that

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they used to to give you a visual as to

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the type of protection they'd like to see around their

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>businesses as lame um saying if that's your best defense

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>against marauding armies, you're you're not much good and uh um.

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of chuckling back and forth, but I

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's kind of a misunderstanding as to what a

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>mode is all about. And and they explained how most

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are your competitive advantage, a reason why the product gear

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>offering will continue to have a market, which is values

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it above him beyond your cost of production. And I

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>thought it was it was kind of cute at the

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>end when they talked about, well, you can make fun

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of our moats, but we have a nice moat around

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Seas Chocolates, which is one of their businesses, which is

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>very big in California of course, where Elon Musk is

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and kind of challenged in a humorous way. Elon must

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you know, overcome the mote that Sees Chocolate

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>has in California. Um. There's been some tweets back in

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the well from Elon Musk. He's saying he may take

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>them up on the challenge, but I'll have to bet

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>with the Warren and Charlie if there sees Canny enjoys

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a very great moat, and Elon is not gonna build

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a touch it. What did he say about Apple, because

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they did buy one another seventy five million shares in

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, and it turns out that neither of

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>them actually use an iPhone. Yeah, you know, it's kind

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of odd. I think I think the analysis is that

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a consumer good rather than a tech company.

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>And you know, they see people's embrace of the the

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>everything mac and iPhone ecosphere and see recurring revenues coming

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>from that. So that's one thing. Of course, they really

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that it was well priced relative to

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other tech companies. Is actually priced um

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>uh in terms of price to earnings below the overall market,

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and when you back out the cash is not being

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>used to create the profits, the price earning creation is

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>even less. And they also liked how Tim Cook thinks,

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>which to cut to the chase means that unneeded capital

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>will be returned to shareholders in the form of stock buybacks,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and we just saw increase in the dividend. I think

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he likes the financial management at Apple, he likes the product,

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and quite frantically when you're a six hundred billion dollar

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>market cap company like Berkshire Hathaway, you need very large

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>targets to invest in so you don't rock the market

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>or end up controlling it and having a file with

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. Of course, Apple fits that bill to a t.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for being with us.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>David Diets is the founder of the president and chief

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>investment strategist at Point of View Wealth Management, giving us

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>his take on the Berkshire Hathway annual meeting that took

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>place over the weekend in omah On, Nebraska. Thanks for

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:26:54.600 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio Bo