WEBVTT - What Will a Kamala Harris Economy Look Like?

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I have that two thousand and eight feeling. The excitement

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>is real. I think it's happening from the ground up.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel two thousand and eight excitement right now, and

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I think we have a real opportunity here America.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 4>Hope is making a comeback. Welcome to our Democratic National

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Convention edition of voter Nomics, the Bloomberg podcast where politics

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 4>and Markets collide. All year, we've been talking and talking

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 4>about how voters around the world have the ability to

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 4>move markets, countries, and economies like never before in twenty

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, and we're focusing now on US voters ahead

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 4>of the November election. I'm Stephanie Flanders, hosting from Chicago,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 4>where the convention is underway, and with me from the

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg White House team. Very glad to say senior reporter

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Josh Wingrove, thanks for being here, Thank you for having me. Well,

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 4>we're taking this on Wednesday, we should say, so it's

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 4>more than halfway through the convention. I think we're knee

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 4>deep in vibes. There's been a lot of discussion about

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 4>the vibes. So it's not a week for policy wonts,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 4>but we have been doing our best to resist that

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 4>with round tables with some key figures in the party

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 4>and advisors to Kamala Harris at the Bloomberg Hub where

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 4>we're sitting right now, which is just down the road

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 4>from the convention hall. But inside, I would say it's

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 4>been a week for Democrats to get all fired up

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 4>and potentially excite some voters sitting at home with this

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>just very recently improved ticket of Kamala Harris and Tim Walks. Josh,

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 4>you are very young, but you're not so young. I

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 4>think you probably still can remain the two thousand and

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 4>eight is making a comeback here.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Not as young as I used to be. I remember

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and eight very well. Hope is making a

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 2>comeback if you talk to the people here, which is

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to say, Democrats are indulging themselves and letting them speak aloud.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>This thought that, oh my gosh, could the sort of

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>broad coalition that elected and swept Obama to power sixteen

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>years ago come together again? And of course that's a

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>big change from a month ago when Democrats were pretty

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>despondent in sort of a public friendly war about whether

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>to you know, dump or pressure Joe Biden to step away.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>But there is a sense that Harris has momentum, and

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>in particular, I think we're seeing that sort of change

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>expectations depending on what you ask. Certainly, in the House,

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Democrats seem very confident that they're going to have a

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>really good shot at taking back the House of Representatives,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>making Kakim Jeffries the speaker. And from there it gets

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a little mess here. And so we you know, we've talked,

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>for instance here with the Pennsylvania governor. He thinks his

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 2>state is both the tipping point state, which is, you know,

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>to say, the one that will decide things and a

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>toss up. And so it just goes to show you,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>like how we're really down to the wire here. But

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 2>you're right, from a policy perspective, it's you know, it's

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 2>not just a ViBe's election at the convention. We're having

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>a ViBe's election in general.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I was very struck watching the former President

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Obama on Tuesday night his speech here in Chicago, which

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 4>definitely had allusions to the electrifying one that he gave

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>in Boston in two thousand and four. As a little note,

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Senator I was lucky enough to that was the last

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 4>convention I was at. But as you say, there's no

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 4>getting around the fact, even with all these great vibes,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>the country is still split down the middle. And you

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 4>have maybe forty six percent of voters who had died

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 4>in the world supporters Donald Trump, maybe even a bit

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 4>more enthusiastic now than they were a month ago, and

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>something close to that, strongly supporting the Democrats and certainly

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 4>opposing Donald Trump. So just that small middle ground to

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 4>play for. You mentioned Governor Josh Shapiro. We had an

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 4>event with him that you were at here in the

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Hub just this morning, and you know, he's the governor

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 4>of the must win swingy as state of all and

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>this is how he described the situation.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Our last two presidential election races in Pennsylvania settled by

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 5>about a point or less forty four thousand votes and

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 5>eighty thousand votes in a state of thirteen million people

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 5>over nine million registered voters. So the fact that races

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 5>are close in Pennsylvania is really not something that is

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 5>surprising as we look forward with that history, I think

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 5>it's important to note that the gap that existed between

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 5>Trump and Biden has really been closed. I think your

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 5>outlets have all done polling, maybe it's plus one minus one.

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 5>I think we're statistically even at this point. And what

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 5>I think Vice President Harris and Governor Wallas have done

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 5>really effectively is build the coalition back together and be

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 5>in a position where we're what seventy seven days seventy

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 5>eight days out and really be, as I describe it,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 5>on the forty nine yard line in Pennsylvania. You can

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 5>pick up forty eight or forty nine yards. It's that

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 5>last yard and a half to get on the other

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 5>side of the field that is really really tough. How

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 5>do you do that? Obviously, we've got important urban centers

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 5>in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. The Philly suburbs are incredibly important,

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 5>and as we proved in my election and others have

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 5>as well, these rural areas are areas where Democrats have

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 5>to compete. We know in twenty sixteen we didn't do

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 5>as well as we needed to in those areas. I

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 5>will tell you I think those rural areas are fired

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 5>up for Donald Trump. I don't think we should pretend

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 5>that they're not. But what I have experienced in just

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 5>the last few weeks that Kama Harris has been leading

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 5>the ticket is when I'm in those communities and I

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 5>camp out there, I spend a lot of time there

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 5>as governor. They'll come over to me and say, hey,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 5>what do you think of her? You know her, what's

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 5>the deal? And I say that in no way to

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 5>be disparaging. I say that because there's a genuine interest

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 5>and curiosity in her candidacy. And that's a good sign.

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 5>I'll tell you what else is a really good sign.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 5>She and Tim showed up there. What was it three

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 5>four days ago? I think it was on Sunday, if

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm not mistaken. In Beaver County. They went to one

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 5>of these rural communities, think like kind of rural area

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 5>outside of Pittsburgh, and they went and talked about cutting costs,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 5>and they went and talked about economic issues. If you

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 5>remember back, you know, we all remember Barack Obama having

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 5>huge rallies in Philly. What a lot of people don't

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 5>remember is his first rally was in Beaver County. That's

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 5>a county the Democrats have been losing for years. I won,

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 5>and that's an area where we have to be competitive.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 5>And so the fact that people are curious about her candidcy,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 5>the fact that she showed up there and talked about

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 5>issues on their minds. Really really gives me a lot

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 5>of hope and OPTI miser for that last that last

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 5>yard and a half. It's so difficult to come by

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 5>in our stay.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 4>Gummor Shapiro was was sort of cautiously optimistic. He saw

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of energy on the ground, but that there's

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot more for them to do, right.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And Harris herself is trying to pump the brakes

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 2>as well, because it's good to be confident, but complacency

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is a different animal. That's what they're worried about. You know,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this is all happening at unprecedented speed. I

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>think we shouldn't lose sight of that. I mean, you know,

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the arguments a month and a half ago

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 2>was that they're simply for keeping Biden, was that there

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>simply wasn't time to build the plane in mid air

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that they are now building. And so the you know,

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I think for Harris, she has inherited a party that

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>has done a couple of things. Number One, rallied completely

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>around her in the matter of an hour, it felt

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 2>like on that Sunday. Another thing is that her position

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the ticket has also really taken

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of states off board that were competitive now,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>so we're gonna have a more focused election, whereas previously

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump was thinking he was going to break through in

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, Minnesota, Virginia, maybe New York, New Jersey and

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>what might be sort of a fantastical.

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 4>That's so we're going to see a lot of big

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 4>rallies in.

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>So we're snabbing right back down to what it was

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 2>about seven or eight swing states. I think broadly position

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>for Harris now. The question is how much meat do

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to put on this bone. She has taken

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>steps to keep doors open, not close them, including if

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>that leaves egg on her face by saying forget what

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I said five years ago, I actually believe the opposite now.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think that is the level set that we

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>should expect for the next seven years so days whatever

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the campaign will be, which, by the way, in other states,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>it's only half that with early voting kicking in something

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>soon here, I would expect her to continue to risk

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>embarrassment by backtracking on policies to open pathways for her

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 2>or leave open the question of what she things, rather

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>than her pinning a policy list on the wall and

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>saying this is what I stand for. It they don't

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>think that's their path.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 4>That was interesting. So we had We're sitting in the

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 4>room where we've had some of these events at the

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Hub, and there were two quite senior policy advisers,

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 4>d Kamala Harris who spoke to us, Harris who spoke

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 4>to us just a few hours ago, one of whom

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 4>had been her chief of staff when she was in

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 4>the Senate. And it was striking how little information they

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 4>could give when you talk about putting meat on the bones.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 4>We had this kind of sketch of her economic proposals

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 4>last week. When are we going to find out how

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 4>she's going to pay for this renewal of the child

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 4>tax credit and the support for homeowners? And then I

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 4>realized that they were referring to that speech as their

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 4>most detailed speech that they were going to give, really

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 4>and it just brought home to me how many questions

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 4>there are unanswered, and crucially this debate with Donald Trump

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 4>on September tenth. I mean, we were asking these advisers

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 4>about foreign policy, Josh, do you expect to have any

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 4>substance on what President Kamala Harris how she would approach

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 4>foreign policy between now and the debate, I.

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Think it's a coin flip about whether they're going to

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 2>try to put something in the window before the debate.

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>What they have said is look at her record, So

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about a record on foreign policy. Hawk on Ukraine,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>for sure, she would continue Biden's approach of seeing it

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 2>as a priority for the US not only to send

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 2>support to Ukraine directly, but to continue to try to

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 2>muster an alliance and sort of global coalition to support

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine in its fight against Russia. So I think that

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>one is clear. I don't expect an in daylight on

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 2>that one. In Gaza, it's more murky. She has tried

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to sell the same policy as Biden in a different way.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>For instance, she calls for a ceasefire and then says

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 2>Hamas has to agree to it, whereas Biden says Hamas

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 2>has to agree to the ceasefire. So it's just little

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>differences like this. But yeah, difference not really a difference.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>There's a rhetorical difference. But in their live's election, rhetoric

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>is perhaps everything. But you're right, we were sitting here

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>looking at, you know, this small bone with flicks of

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 2>meat on it and saying where's the rest of it?

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>And they're saying it's right in front of you. Enjoyed.

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 4>This is the detail to go back to where we started.

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 4>But you had raised a wild card in that conversation

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 4>with the advisors, which I have to admit I'd not

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 4>been focusing so much on because it sounds so so

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 4>much wishful thinking. But you know, this possibility that the

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Democrats could win the Senate and House of Representatives as

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 4>well as the presidency, is that really plausible? I mean,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 4>certainly the people who had taught me through some of

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 4>these races earlier in the year, it just looked like

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 4>a big ass, particularly in the Senate, because every Senate

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 4>seat being contested pretty much is democratic. They can't afford

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 4>to lose even one.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a bad map for them this year. They're

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 2>going to lose West Virginia. They have fifty one seats.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Now, I guess we should just remind people outside the

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 4>states way the elections.

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Wait, yeah, why the map is the crowd? This is

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the grash course. They there are very few senators in

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>America who represent a party other than the dominant party

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 2>in that state. In other words, you got red states.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 2>You have blue states. They didn't have two red senators

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>or two blue senators. Very few divided. West Virginia's divide

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 2>and Joe Manchiin isn't running again, and that is no

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 2>one expects that to seat to stick with the Democrats.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 2>It'll flip hard to the Republicans.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Because many people didn't consider him to be a temper

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 4>correct correct.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>He was sort of a dying breed of red state democrat.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 2>And so now that the starting point is fifty to fifty,

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>it basically all comes down to more or less Ohio

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and Montana, two red states where Democrats have incumbent senators

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>shared Brown and Ohio John Tester and Montana. We're trying

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to hold on basically running at arms length from Harris

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>and even more and when it was Biden, they were

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 2>running it miles length from Biden, trying to sort of

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>squeak by still against Democratic headwinds that have been shifting.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 2>So can it happened for Democrats? Can this wave that

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>is maybe building or maybe cresting, It's unclear. If it's

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 2>just a building wave that will continue as momentum, then

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Democrats might become the dog that caught the car and

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>then suddenly they in that scenario would be almost certain

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 2>that they would have the House by a fairly healthy margin.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Harris gets selected, and then of course, maybe they

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>sweep by in the Senate with a fifty to fifty

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>tie that the Vice President Tim Walls, Harris's running mate,

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 2>could split ties in so they can ram stuff through.

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Suddenly they get what's called a reconciliation bill, which is

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>a grab bag of stuff that they can push through.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 2>You can do one of those a year or so,

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and this, you know, now it's a question of wish list.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Right So right now they're like quite a long way

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>away from that, correct Right So, right now, beating Donald

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump is enough. And we have seen not a hint

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 2>really of policy dispute among Democrats at this convention. They

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 2>are perfectly fine to break out the same song sheet

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>and you have a show of unity. They can continue

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>to do that quite easily if Republicans hold at least

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 2>one chamber, because you have a boogeyman, and by definition

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 2>you're constrained by what has to be a by part

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>as an agreement. If they catch the car, if they

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>get all three, if this is some kind of wave

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>that's been building, then Harris is going to have to

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>decide what she.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 4>I think lack of opposition is probably a problem that

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 4>they would like to face. But I'm struck that it's

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 4>the one thing, even with all these good vibes, it's

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 4>the one thing that they do seem to be superstitious

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 4>about even thinking about. In the UK and actually I

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 4>think quite a lot of other countries, the custom in

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 4>any election is not to jinx it and never talk

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 4>as if you assume.

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>That you're going to win, or assume.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Here it's mandatory even if you don't have a chance

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 4>in hell. You have to talk describe yourself as the

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 4>next president or the next senator. So we will see,

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 4>but gosh, thank you very much.

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 4>So on the sidelines of the convention, in my continued

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 4>efforts to inject substance into the vibes, I sat down

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 4>with Heather Bouchet, an economist who previously served as the

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 4>president and CEO of the Washington Center for Equitable Growth

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 4>and at the Center for American Progress, among other things.

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 4>She does now currently serve as a member of President

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Joe Biden's Council of Economic Advisors, but she spoke to

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 4>me very much in her personal capacity, and what I

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 4>wanted to hear from her was what she thought about

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 4>this ticket and the emerging economic plan in so far

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 4>as we've seen it from Vice President Harris Heather, thank

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 4>you very much for doing this. I should also ask

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 4>you with this your first convention.

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 3>No, this is my second convention. But now I'm very

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 3>excited to be here, and you know, God to hear

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 3>the presidents speak last night and to see actually the

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Vice president speaking. You know, she talked a little bit

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>about her economics. But it's very exciting to be able

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 3>to be a part of this historic moment.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 4>And did you always know you were coming? I just

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 4>wondered whether if you, like me, were thinking a couple

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 4>of months ago that this was not necessarily going to

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 4>be a fun event to attend.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I had made my reservations many many months ago. I

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 3>think it's important, especially for those on the ECON team

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 3>in general. You know, I think about economics, to see

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>what people are talking about in terms of the economy,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 3>what are the questions on people's minds, and that helps

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 3>us think about what kinds of policy issues we want

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 3>to focus on.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you are you're sitting in the White House

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 4>or I guess adjoining the White House because most people

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 4>end up there's no room in the White House for

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 4>most of the officials who work there. I'm fascinated just

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 4>on a personal level, how it's been to be sitting

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 4>there the last few weeks as the election has just

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 4>been turned on its head. I mean, how has that

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 4>felt like on the inside.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I can see a couple of things. I Mean,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 3>the reality is is that the economy is this huge

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 3>HiT's this huge beast, and there's so much that has

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>been moving forward, and so I have been really focused on,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, watching where the numbers are coming in, what's

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 3>happening with jobs and inflation and all of these sorts

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>of questions, and you know, in thinking about how the

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 3>policy agenda that the President and the Vice President put

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>out many months ago when they put forth the budget,

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>they are teeing up a whole set of policies that

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 3>we want to do to make sure that we continue

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 3>to see an economy that delivers for working families. So

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 3>those are some of the questions that continue to be

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 3>important in front and center.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Regardless of he's on the top of the ticket. All Right,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 4>it sounds like I'm not gonna be able to get

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 4>you on all the sort of personal misgivings or not

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 4>of what's happened. But I mean on that point, and

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 4>you sounded a little bit like it even just then.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, one criticism that's been leveled at the was

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 4>leveled at the Biden Harris campaign was that there was

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 4>too much focus in those campaign speeches on the past achievements,

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 4>and he almost seemed to be sometimes telling people they

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 4>should feel better about the economy than they actually were.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, do you recognize that as a criticism.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Gosh, looking back over the past four years, the United

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 3>States and around the world, we've all been through the Ringer,

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 3>this global pandemic. It upended economies. We saw how because

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 3>of these global supply chains that were so fragile, we

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 3>had these really big price bikes because you know, people

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 3>couldn't get to work and things couldn't get made, and

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>we saw all of these challenges, and I think what

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I've learned as an economist is that it takes a

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 3>while for that to work through an economy. But it

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 3>also you know, I think you hear people being frustrated

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 3>that things aren't better as quickly as maybe they would like,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 3>or and I think this is really an important piece

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 3>of the puzzle for a lot of people. The economy

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 3>wasn't working before the pandemic. You know, here in the

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>United States, we've had half century of rising economic inequality.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Families were struggling with affording care and education and in

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 3>housing and all of these things pre pandemic. And there

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 3>was this moment during the pandemic where policymakers gay families

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of support, and a lot of people change jobs,

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of opportunity. We've actually seen three

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 3>years now of historic new business startups. And yet I

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 3>think you know now that much of that aid has

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 3>started to fade or has been pulled back. I think

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>people are sort of like, well, wait a minute, how

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 3>is this new economy going to work for me and

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 3>my family? And so I think the fact that a

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of investments have been made, but they aren't quite

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>being being felt yet.

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Even in a normal circumstance, if you had vice president

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 4>running for president, there's always that balance that he or

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 4>she would have to strike between talking up the achievements

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 4>of the administration they were involved with, but also pointing

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 4>to the unfinished business. And I guess that I guess

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 4>there's a feeling that with the Biden campaign that there

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 4>was too much focus on all the great things you've done,

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 4>the big bits of unfinished business. I mean, you've touched

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 4>on some of them.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 3>So first of all, I think one big piece of

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 3>unfinished business that I think does need to be mentioned

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 3>is that so much of this administration has done has

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 3>been about investing in the United States all across America,

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 3>investing in communities, investing in new manufacturing capacity, investing in

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 3>making and clean energy economy. All of that needs to continue.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>But there are these big ticket items that we haven't

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 3>been able to that still need work. And so one

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 3>of those, of course is housing. We've seen challenges in

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 3>insufficient housing supply. We've seen that it just did cost

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 3>too much for families. It was really exciting to see

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 3>the Vice President come out with a set of policies

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 3>it would increase housing supply. We also need to make

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 3>sure that for those families that have kids that in particular,

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 3>that they get the help and the support they need.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 3>And so I was also really excited to see that

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 3>the Vice President came out with a pretty robust plan

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 3>to provide an expansion the child tax credit. For children

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 3>in their first.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Year of RUSS but also quite expensive.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Certainly well supporting families.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 4>You didn't talk about how it's going to be paid for.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 3>She did talk about, though, increasing the corporate tax rate

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:13.959
<v Speaker 3>to twenty eight percent, which has been a part of

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the budget that she and the President worked one.

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 4>Pile of the budget before you committed to increasing the

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 4>under the child tax credit.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 3>It was, but I think it's signals that she has

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>committed to making sure that we fix the tax system

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 3>in the United States so that it is more fair,

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 3>so that corporations pay their fair share. And you know,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 3>we'll have to see where her campaign goes and everything

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 3>that certainly is a part of the budget. In that

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 3>process which she has been a part of in the

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 3>White House, there has been a robust agenda to raise

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 3>taxes at the top. The President has long made this

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 3>commitment to not increase taxes on I mean, making anyone

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 3>making less than four hundred thousand dollars a year. But

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 3>what the President is shown through those budgets is that

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 3>you actually can do that math. It is possible to

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 3>have a robust tax agenda to be able to pay

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>for things like making sure that families have that tax benefit.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 3>And of course that's in contrast to the proposals that

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 3>you know, Donald Trump is put forward, which are just

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, again and again tax cuts for the very

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 3>wealthiest on the backs of the middle class that are

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>not going to lead to the kinds of growth or

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 3>improvements in middle class well being that I think we

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 3>will see under.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, one of his proposals which was not so

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 4>directly focused on the rich and was many economists that

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 4>just sort of greeted as being totally stupid, was about

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 4>not taxing tips. And now Kamala Harris has also endorsed

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 4>that proposal, So I mean, that is one that surely

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 4>is an economist, you wouldn't necessarily think it was a

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 4>good idea.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly, you know the vice president's come out for

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the President's come out for it. I think that there

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>has long been a challenge for low wage workers in

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 3>this country, and you know, certainly both the President and

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Vice President been very clear that we need to raise

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 3>them inimum wage. We need to make sure that those

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 3>workers that you know serve food for us in restaurants

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 3>alocassic country, and you know, make sure that you're.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Going to cut taxes just if it's called a tip,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 4>but not if it's called regular wages.

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 3>This is part of a larger package to make sure

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 3>that those workers are paid a fair and days pay.

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Another proposal that was in her speech in North Carolina recently,

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 4>which was the sort of first hints at some of

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 4>her economic proposals, was as a push against price gouging,

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 4>which where she seemed to suggest certainly in the speech

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 4>she talked about price controls in groceries and key goods.

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 4>So I'm just again that's something where economists, even people

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 4>who've done relatively little economists economics, just doesn't sound like

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 4>a good idea when something is in short supply to

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.719
<v Speaker 4>stop producers from raising the price.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I mean, I'll see a couple of things

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 3>on this. I mean, first of all, now I think

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 3>what she was, what I heard her talking about the

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 3>speech and the fact she and the stuff that she

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>wrote about there is that you know, we know that

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 3>prices are too high.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 2>We know that.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've seen over the past year grocery prices

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 3>have increased by just over percent one point one percent.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 3>That's down from increasing by thirteen percent, you know, back

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty two. So certainly there's been progress on that,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 3>but we have seen that the groceries have not brought

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 3>prices down, And I think what she has been focused

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 3>on is that there are too many corporate actors that

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>have been acting in bad fate. They haven't been passing

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>on their lower prices onto consumers. And of course it

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 3>is the case that there are price gouging laws and

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 3>states all across the country, including in Texas. And in fact,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 3>what she has proposed is similar to what Republicans in

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the Senate have proposed. Now we know that in this economy,

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 3>making sure that markets are competitive so that they can

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 3>benefit consumers and workers and families and communities is a

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 3>really important part of the economic agenda. Things have become

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 3>far tooconomically concentrated, and it does mean that making sure

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 3>that bad faith actors can't take advantage of the situation

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 3>is a really important part of the policy agenda.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 4>I guess that just seems a bit of a disconnect

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 4>because a lot of the discussions, the sort of explanations

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 4>we've had since you know, she talked in the speech

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 4>about price controls, we talked about groceries. It was in

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 4>the context of talking about the kind of things you've

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 4>just talked about, you know, the big rise in grocery

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 4>prices over the last few years. But then when when

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 4>her advisors have spoken about the details, she suggested that

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 4>it would really only be in very specific sort of

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 4>natural disaster hurricane in the local market. You stop the

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 4>local grocery from like gouging the people there, and that's

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 4>that we're doing that, which arguably you could do anyway

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 4>with the rules that are already in place. It is

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 4>very different from addressing the overall rise in the grocery

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 4>prices over the last couple of years. So it sort

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 4>of feels like there's a disconnect between the rhetorics surrounding it,

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.239
<v Speaker 4>and then when cornered what the proposal actually is.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that we start from understanding that the

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 3>pandemic was different, right. We know that that led to

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of supply side challenges, and we know that,

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, and again there's there are laws around the

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 3>country on price gouging, because at some points in time,

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>there are challenges in these markets, in various kinds of markets.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 3>But it sounds like her proposal is focused on making

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 3>sure that there aren't bad faith actors and that the

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 3>federal government has the capacity to take steps. And again

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 3>this is consistent with Senate, with proposals that Republicans in

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 3>the Senate have also put forward.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, you look at some of these proposals, for

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 4>example on housing, you know, many people would applaud it.

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 4>They talk about it being a ymbi agenda, you know,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 4>saying yes in my backyard, pushing through building of housing

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 4>and increasing the supply as well as helping on the

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 4>demands of helping people of fort housing. It's a pretty

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 4>activist agenda, and it involves kind of going into local

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 4>areas and pushing through development plans. At the same time

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 4>as you're putt quite a lot of money into people's

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 4>pockets through the child tax credit. We don't know how

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be paid for. I mean, the criticism

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 4>from the Republican side that this is a very progressive,

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 4>quite interventionist, activist president, potentially Kamala Harris, that's right, isn't it.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I wouldn't. I wouldn't accept that criticism, right,

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, coming from the Republican side. And you look

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 3>at the policy agenda that Donald Trump is put forward,

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you see him using the tools of

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 3>government to benefit those at the top of the income distribution,

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>to benefit the wealthy, him using the power of government

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 3>to put in place policies that will raise costs for

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 3>consumers all across the country. So it's it's in whose

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 3>interest are you using these these tools in these levers?

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 3>And you know what, I what I see the Vice

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 3>President putting together an agenda to do in in a

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 3>very robust way and consistent with the work that she's

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 3>done over the past four years as Vice president, is

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that government is working to build the

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 3>middle class, to make sure that prices are fair, to

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 3>make sure that people had economic opportunities. So it's not

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 3>a question of whether government is intervening, it's on whose

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 3>behalf and in whose interest they're intervening.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Finally, very briefly, you said it was your second convention

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 4>apart from Kamala Harris's speech, which I guess everyone's supposed

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 4>to say, is that highlight the end of the week.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Who are you looking forward to seeing?

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I will say I worked on Hillary Clinton's

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 3>transition team, and so I got to see her speak

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 3>last night, and it was it was really beautiful and amazing,

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 3>and to see how far we've come since she ran

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 3>for office, and to see how excited everybody is about

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 3>what's to come was just it was really moving to

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 3>hear her speak.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm excited economist, Heatasha. Thank you very much, Thank you

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 4>thanks for listening to this week's special Voter Nomics from Chicago.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 4>This episode was hosted by me Stephanie Flanders, who was

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 4>produced by Samosadi, with production support and sound designed by

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Moses and Brendan Francis Noonan is our executive producer and

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Sage Bowman is head of Popcarve and special thanks in

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 4>this episode goes to Josh Wingrove, Heather Bouchet, Christi Cally,

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 4>and all of Bloomberg's team here in Chicago. Please, if

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 4>you like the show, go rate and review it.