WEBVTT - The WSJ On Polymarket's Questionable Ads

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Also media, Hello and welcome to Better Offline. I am,

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of course your host ed zetron. Also today, I am

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>joined by two incredible reports from the Wall Street Journal,

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Long and Kaitlyn Ostrov, who just published an incredible

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and truly horrible story about poly Market and they're extremely

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>questionable influence marketing campaigns. Katheryne Caitlyn, thanks for joining me.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>So happy with me here, thanks for having us said.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so walk me through exactly what poly market was

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>doing with these influencers and social media. What were they

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>paying for? What was then end result?

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>So the end result was an onslaught of videos that

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>appeared to show college age social media creators betting and

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>winning large amounts of money online. But what we found

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 3>is that all of those bets were actually fake. They

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 3>were placed on a dummy platform that Polymarket built to

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>almost exactly, but not precisely, resemble the website, and some

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>of the wins that the influencers showed themselves having were

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>faked as well. The creators were using things like outdated

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 3>footage or altered headlines to suggest that they won really

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>lucrative vets, when in fact they would have lost.

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Right so just to be cleared, So the bets were fake,

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the website was fake. But also the bets would have

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>lost a.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Lot of them, would have not every single one, but

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the majority of the videos where bets were placed would

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 4>have actually lost in real life, but they were depicted

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 4>as winning.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>That's truly awful. I thought Polymarket was illegal in America

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>You would be right about that.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Polymarket entered a settlement with federal regulators back in twenty

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty two in which they agreed to stop offering their

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 3>platform to US traders. But as anybody who's used a

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 3>VPN knows, it's pretty trivial to get around things like

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 3>that kind of geofencing. Anybody with a VPN has been

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 3>able to access poly Market, even if they're based in

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>the US or other countries where poly Market is banned.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And so these influences, they're American based, right.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's a mix. Some are based in Canada, some

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 4>are based in the US, and then you know they's

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 4>likely creators and other jurisdictions as well. But that was

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>one of the mixed that we looked at in our corpus.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it looks like he was about eleven hundred videos.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You went over so that's truly it's truly a massive

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>scale operation. But do you think it's bigger than the

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>ones you saw or is it just it? Like? Did

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you get any idea of the total scale?

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we reviewed eleven hundred videos that had been

0:02:56.400 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 3>posted between late December correct Primaron Kaitlyn was a little

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>it's never late November, late last year, late twenty twenty

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>five by all accounts, late twenty twenty five and mid

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>May of this year. So eleven hundred videos, ten creators.

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 3>My impression and belief for my reporting and Caitlin's reporting

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 3>and the reporting of our other colleagues is that this

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 3>is just the tip of the iceberg as far as

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>poly markets marketing operation. We identified dozens of other creators

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 3>who were posting videos in similar formats. We didn't scrape

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>their videos, but we thought our sample size was sufficient.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy, So walk me through the exact stage. So

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a video of a guy based guessing whether

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump will say in shah a Lah. I think was

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>one of probably not in your but like Trump will

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>say burger or something, and then they're staring at the

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>TV and then they go always said burger, but the

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>website they were making the bet home was just completely fake.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so yeah, so yeah. So in these videos, when

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>you watch them, you will often see a college age

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 4>student kind of go in with like this hook phrase,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 4>but they'll say throw what or wait what, and then

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 4>they will be like, oh, I can, like I can

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 4>bet on this market, and they'll depict the market, and

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 4>then sometimes it will show essentially what the outcome is

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 4>of that market. They'll cut to video of Trump saying

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 4>a certain word or phrase, and then they'll jump up

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 4>and down and sort of give the impression that they've won.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is targeting children, So college age kids like that,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's explicitly targeting young people.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I wouldn't go that far as to say it's

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>explicitly targeting on people. But what we do know about

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 3>who it's targeting is that it is targeting Americans. We

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 3>looked at Polymarkets instructions to people who were paid to

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 3>boost the reach of this campaign online. A third party

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 3>contractor that Polymarket worked with to help manage the camp

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>said we'll only pay you if at least sixty percent

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>of your audience is based in the United States. And

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>then two you know, as to the point you alluded to, yes,

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the creators who are making these videos, they are colleged

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 3>aged college students, people in their early to mid twenties.

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Certainly, Jesus, it feels like introducing children to gambling on

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>some level. I mean, maybe you can't say that, but

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sent. I mean it seems like showing young people

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>doing something and saying you can get bread, which is

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a young person's way of referring to money. For the

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>old heads listening, I knew that one. I'm not that all,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but it just it feels quite dystopian, is kind of

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm getting at.

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 4>It certainly is marketed to give the impression that this

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 4>is a way to make money off of what you know.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 4>So the majority of the bets that we looked at,

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, they showed a trade being placed. Most didn't

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 4>show an outcome, but for those that did, you know,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 4>almost all of them it was someone winning. I think

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 4>there was like what four or five Catherine and the

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 4>group that we looked at where someone was depicted as

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 4>losing their bet. So the overarching message was you can

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 4>make money.

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I kind of find it fascinating that there's one way

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they lost anyway, keep.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Going, Yeah, I was just going to chime in and

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>add that, you know, in addition to the creators showing

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>themselves appearing to win money, they also implied that they

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>were wealthy in other ways, including by showing account balances

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 3>on this dummy website, where again no real money was

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>being traded. These balances were fictitious, but the videos showed

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>their account balances on poly market and the tens of

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 3>thousands of dollars. Some even had balances over one hundred

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars. And one of the creators whose videos we reviewed,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 3>she shows herself placing bets from San Francisco bedroom, and

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 3>then she'll have a video where she's showing herself dancing

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>on a beach in front of the Golden gate Bridge

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>and she says poly Market funds my life, and there's

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 3>a Hello Kitty sticker in the corner that.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Says I am unemployed.

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So the impression is certainly that, you know, these people

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 3>are are making enough money off of polymarket to support

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>themselves and support themselves in fairly high style.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds like kind of like a real operation here,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like in the sense that there is like they're building

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>functional dummy websites because looking I'm as we speak I

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have the the anime gifts from the Peace up and

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's these seem quite intricate. These perhaps their vibe code

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't really matter because no payment rails are

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in there, but these seem like they are built to

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>look identical.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 4>They are extremely convincing. Catherine and I and our colleagues

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 4>were looking at these for about two weeks before our

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 4>colleague Neil meta Or realized that like, this is not

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 4>poly market. Like we started off firmly believing that this

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 4>was poly market.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, when you say that, so this is the

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>p oh iy market website. When you say it, believe

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you believed it was polymarket, What did you think the

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>purpose was when you found it?

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 4>We thought these were just videos that you know, people

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 4>were making, showing themselves placing actual trades on poly market.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we had a theory at the onset

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 4>as to why they were doing this, but we came

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 4>across a bunch of these videos and we were curious

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 4>to understand, you know, what was happening, like who these

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 4>people were, how they were making money. And so we

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 4>have this database of all of the polymarket trades that

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 4>we had been building over the past several months, and

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 4>we started off trying to trace these trades. We wanted

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 4>to understand, you know, what bets were happening, who was

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 4>making these, and we want to go about finding those

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 4>because all of Polymarket's data is public, and we very

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 4>quickly realized that we could not figure out like we

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 4>couldn't place these trades, we could not find the actual

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 4>trades shown in the video, and it took us and

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 4>minute to realize that this was not actually happening on polymarket.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 4>And the red flag for that ended up being that

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 4>website poi y Market, which our colleague Neil Metta saw

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 4>and flagged to us.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Hell yeah, good work, Neil.

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, major shout out to Neil.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing though, so wait, maybe I'm misunderstanding this.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So the not only did the trades, did some of

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the trades never exist, like it was never possible to

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>bet on that particular outcome.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 3>All of the markets that we saw did exist. And

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>that's one of the reasons why it took us so

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 3>long to understand that we were looking at a fake website.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we were cambing through this database. Caitlin has

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 3>been painstakingly building over months of every single trade on

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 3>polly Market, which you know is accessible to us because

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Polymarket is a is a blockchain based system, so everything

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 3>is public. And you know, we were looking for these

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 3>trades that appeared to have taken place, right we saw

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 3>a video of it taking place, and it just didn't

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 3>seem to exist in this database. And at that point

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 3>we you know, thanks to Neil's eagle eyes showing that

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, one of these creators had seemingly made a

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 3>mistake and accidentally left the URL of this fake site

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>poi Market, poi y Market. Yeah, that poly market had

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 3>built in his video, And it was only because of

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 3>that clue that we started being able to unravel that

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 3>all of these videos that we were looking at were

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 3>actually being placed on fake websites, which, as we've mentioned,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the fake websites were almost identical to the real poly market.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 3>But you know, once we started looking for some more

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>of these clues, once we knew that the website was fake,

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 3>we were able to distinguish various ways in which to

0:10:52.840 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>tell the fake website from the real website.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So was was it just poimarket or whether like multiple

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>other fake websites as well.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we like, once we started looking for other

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 4>like simulated polymarket websites. We did find a couple of others,

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 4>but the I think all of the ones that like

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 4>we were able to identify specifically what the website was

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 4>was Poimarket. There was one other where it was like

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 4>this developer link that appeared in a handful of videos

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>where it was like one of the like polymarket developers

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 4>dot like their name dot dev dot polymarket, dot dev.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 4>And so it was like this internal development site that

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 4>appeared in a couple of the videos that also seemed

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 4>like it was being used. So we weren't always certain

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 4>like which simulated platform the trade was happening on, in

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>part because we heard from creating part of the instruction

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 4>that they got in making these videos was to not

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 4>make it obvious that it was on a simulated website.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 4>So if you were on a poiy market, you might

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 4>uppercase the I to make it appear like polly Market.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 4>And so you know, we came across a handful of these,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think we are exactly certain of how

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 4>much each one was used.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>That's it's so strange. How is this not illegal? I mean,

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess if the website itself is illegal then illegally

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>advertising the illegal website is kind of just a just

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of doubling down at that point, doesn't really matter. Like,

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>has the government shown I saw that there was some

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of federal inquiry into Pollymarket. Was it related to

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this story?

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>We are not sure if the precise parameters or subject

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 3>of the federal inquiry you're referring I assume to CFTC

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 3>investigation that we reported on last week. Yeah, the contours

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of that investigation are as yet unclear. You know, I

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 3>know that it is ongoing and extensive, according to a

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>person familiar with the investigation. You know, I should add

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 3>as well that the CFTC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission,

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the agency conducting this investigation. A spokesperson for that agency

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 3>declined to comment on the existence of an investigation, citing

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 3>HC policy.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That is just so strange because I've I don't

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>think I've seen anything like this in tech outside of crypto,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>which I know is I know that crypto is kind

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of the is I think polymarket is a crypto product, right,

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a blockchain one, Yeah, it is. They moved on

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>from that crap, that crap referring to a comment that

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm making, not the journalist in.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Questions, No, it is a is a crypto, is a crypto,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 3>it's it's on it's on crypto rails, as they would say, Yes.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That's so strange. What differentiates this from calshe because I

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>basically consider them the same website at this point, but

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're different somehow.

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 4>So we like again, our social media feeds are just

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 4>full with videos for different platforms. You know, we we

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 4>came across the poly Market videos of them placing these trades.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>We've certainly come across a lot of videos of you know,

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 4>people promoting call She, but we haven't come across anything

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 4>similar in the sense of you know, poly Market was

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, telling people use to simulate it website, create

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 4>these bets and do not disclose that you have any affiliation.

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 4>We are always looking to see what we might be

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 4>missing in coverage of this piece, but you know, call

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 4>She is. I guess one difference between it in Polymarket

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 4>is also that it is regulated by CFTC. Polymarket has

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 4>a new US product launched late last year that is

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 4>CFTC regulated, but the broader platform is still offshore. So

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, we we try to look to see what

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 4>we might be miss sing in this phase. But the

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 4>poly market videos kind of stuck out to us as

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 4>we were going through our own social media feeds just

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 4>trying to understand, you know, why we were getting so

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 4>many of these what was behind that? And we did

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 4>not expect it to lead to these simulated bets.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So are your algorithms? But so did you do this

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on your own phones or like a journal approof one,

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>because I'm wondering all your algorithms ruined now? Oh yeah, cooked,

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just like in like eighteen year olds in kids telling

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you to gamble on the future.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Always the arm prediction markets. I like, I see no

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 4>other content at this point?

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, that must be awful.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 4>We're keeping track of things.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, this is why you've just got to look

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>at like lifting videos and palace cats. That's how I

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>get around this, just like you just need to cleanse

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>your feed every so often. But on a on a

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>legal level, just like on a think what differentiates Like

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you said the poly market has a US approved product,

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is like, is that a prediction market? Is it something different?

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is Calshi able to operate legally but not poly market?

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 3>So taking a zooming out here a bit right. So

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Calshi poly Market's biggest competitor, Calci and poly market, they're

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 3>both prediction markets.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 2>The biggest distinction between the two is that Calshi.

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Calshi made a huge bet that it could successfully achieve

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 3>US regulated status, and poly Market conversely decided that it

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 3>was okay operating offshore as an unregistered crypto entity that

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, people can access if they have a VPN,

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 3>but you know they're not technically supposed to. So Calshi

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>has not necessarily played nice with regulators. You know, it

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>had a pretty significant legal battle early in its career

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 3>over whether election markets would be allowed on the platform,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 3>but it did have success. It won that battle, and

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 3>now Calshi is a US regulated prediction market, which it

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 3>says is legally available in all fifty states, although there's

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 3>currently some commotion over Nevada.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Which.

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>As a Vegas resident, you can't take up beautiful gambling

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>away from Vegas residents exactly.

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>So, as one might suspect, the gambling industry is extremely

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 3>worried about the rise of prediction markets. You know, unlike

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 3>online sports books or in person gambling. Calshi and other

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 3>US regulated prediction markets have successfully up till now made

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the argument that they are federally regulated. That means that

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 3>states cannot restrict their operations, So state gambling commissions can't say,

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 3>can't impose conditions on how they operate. They also can't

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 3>levy taxes on prediction markets.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 2>So Calshi has you.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Know, fairly successfully been playing within this federal regulatory structure.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 3>Poly market has been playing outside of it. And for

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 3>a while the two platforms seemed to be growing sort

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 3>of in lockstep, you know. Poly Market started out with

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a lead. It got a huge amount

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 3>of traction after the twenty twenty four presidential election, which

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 3>is successfully called for Donald Trump.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Cal She was a bit of a bit more.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It was.

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 3>It was a lesser known quantity at the time, I

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 3>had less name recognition. But starting around late twenty twenty five,

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 3>cal she actually started to eke ahead of poly market

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to a relative share of trading volume

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 3>on prediction markets.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 2>And as of last month, cal.

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 3>She was doing insanely more volume than poly market on

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>poly markets offshore and US APP combined.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>And do you know what those volumes might be? Roughly,

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to go back to.

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Consult a chart in our.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 4>It was for the month of May twice the amount

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 4>of volume almost twice, sorry, the amount of volume on

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 4>col C versus polymarket.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That's really worrying. I mean, I think so looking this up,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks like seventeen billion dollars in the month of

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>May alone. We live in a godless society. It's a

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>statement I am saying, not the jeneralist in question. It's

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>very worrying. I find this whole thing quite worrying, not

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>just the gambling, but the financialization of everything. I don't

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's good to gamble on every outcome personally, and

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I worry. I worry about this spreading personally, and I

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>don't like it. Feels like it needs regulation in an

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>extreme way that basically doesn't exist yet.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I can I can talk a little bit

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 3>about my own experiences here. You know, I started covering

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Keilan's been covering this space a lot longer than I have.

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 3>I sort of jumped into it at the beginning of

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 3>this year, and as part of the process of growing

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 3>familiar with how prediction markets operate, I decided to watch

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the state of the Union through the lens of a

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>prediction market live streamer who is live streaming the State

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 3>of the Union and talking about the bets that he

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>was placing on what President Trump would say during that speech.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Think similar to watching live sports on which you've wagered,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 3>it was simultaneously more exciting and I think also slightly

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 3>concerning the way that instead of sort of listening for

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 3>the content of the speech, very rapidly for me, turned

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 3>into something closer to a game of sort of wondering

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 3>what the next word is, like what is he going

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 3>to say? And will it hit? Like will the bet hit?

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 3>And so I understand where the concerns that you're describing

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>emanate from. Certainly I would say also that you know,

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of people who point to prediction markets

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 3>as an extremely extremely legitimate financial tool and one that

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 3>institutions can increasingly take advantage of.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the only people I think that are taking

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the only advantage being taken is off the customers,

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 1>because I have to wonder how many people win, and

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>probably isn't very much. And the fact that they have

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to resort to the fact they have to resort to

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this kind of marketing suggests that the wins are not

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>quite as common as they want you to believe.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, and that's one of a previous story that Catherine

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 4>and I worked on together basically analyzed just that how

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 4>many people actually win on frediction markets, and what we

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 4>found was that, you know, about seventy percent of people

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 4>who had traded on polymarket lost money, and the losers

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 4>to winners on Calci, you know, was about two point

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 4>nine to one. And so you know, these while a

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of them marketing is centered around these are prediction

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 4>markets where you can win money, in reality, most people

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 4>do not win money.

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Kind of feels like the DraftKings stuff as well, the

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sportscam claim where it's like, oh, yeah, of course it's

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>really easy to and this is not a statement I

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>align with it. It's easy, you just bet on what

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the winning team will be. But the existence of spreads

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and also the existence of the weird nomenclature that the

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>prediction markets use is how they get you. Like I

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>remember with a camp I was talking about with Nick

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Devoor and Rebecca and Garena from Baron's and it was

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>just like, yeah, the wording around Camone's potential death and

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>then they just pulled the entire thing screwed a bunch

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of people over and how they design, how they design

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and they say what a win is seems to also

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>undermine people, right.

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 4>And we've we've previously reported that, you know, the warding

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 4>for pretty much all of these prediction markets really matters.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 4>And so there's you know, been a lot of people

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 4>who have reached out to us as journalists and said,

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, I put money on this market understanding that

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 4>this is how it was structured, and then the resolution

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>was entirely unexpected or I don't think that it was

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 4>a proper resolution. And so, you know, especially for some

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 4>of these markets where it's not really a finite outcome,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 4>or the rules might be written in a way where

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 4>there's potential for different interpretation, you know, there really is

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 4>a risk of you know, the market not going how

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 4>people who are betting understand it might.

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe people can't even see the rules. The rules

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>are difficult to access in the first place. That was

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the case of somebody we profiled for our last story

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>who wagered everything he had earned so far on prediction

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 3>markets and ended up losing it all and is now

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 3>living in a homeless shelter.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Classic gambler stuff as well, I mean it's even in Vegas.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I live in Vegas, and you walk around and even

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>there in like the gambling hub of everywhere, the airport

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is full of the Hey, if you've got a gambling

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>problem called this number. Hey, gambling problems are scary gambling problem,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem next to a slot machine, of course, But

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like, probably due to a lack of

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>regulatory oversight, that there's the same alarm concern thought from

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the people making these markets. Do they seem Have you

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>heard anything from them about concerns related to gambling addiction

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that.

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 3>So Kelsey fairly recently did add a some language related

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 3>to gambling addiction on its home page. It gave people

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 3>the option to exclude themselves from the website, which is

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 3>another common feature that many gambling apps have.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>What does it? What does that mean?

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Self seclusion is if somebody feels that they have a

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 3>gambling problem, they can ask to be banned from from

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 3>the website, from the gambling app, from the casino of

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not really a nuclear option, but it's

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>a tool that people who are managing a gambling addiction

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>can use if they feel like they're They're gambling has

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 3>gotten out of hand. You know, I think that these platforms,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 3>they don't conceive of themselves as gambling. They conceive of

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 3>themselves as trading. This is, you know, in their minds,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>more akin to day trading or you know, trading in

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 3>currencies than it is to gambling.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Question, so this is hopefully this is a no. But

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I know what I had to Refasan and Caleb Wilson

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>on talking about sports gambling a few months ago. Apparently

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings in the like, So that's last year DraftKings in

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the like they have like an account manager that will

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>actually work with significant betters. Do you know if such

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>thing exists with Calcium Polymarket? Do they have high rollers

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that they covet? Is that something I don't even mean influencers.

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:52.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't know the answer to this.

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I hope the answer is no.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 3>That's that's not something that I have heard about. You know,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 3>what I can say from our own reporting is that

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 3>both platforms seem intent on you know, recruiting college students,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 3>and poly Market in particular has set up relationships with

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 3>college clubs fraternities, offering them you know, payments in exchange

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 3>for signing their classmates up to the site, so I

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 3>would I would.

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Say, it's tell me more about that.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 3>What This was a story that I reported with colleagues,

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 3>including my colleague Kevin Dugan back in I believe it

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 3>was March. It was about both platforms efforts to sign

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 3>up college students. And you know, some great reporting that

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Kevin brought to the story was about Polymarket's efforts to

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 3>recruit students at Columbia University. And they signed this partnership

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 3>with a fraternity at Columbia, and in exchange for every

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 3>student that members of that fraternity signed up, the fraternity

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 3>got some money. And at the end of it there

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 3>was a big sort of Polymarket funded party. The fraternity

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 3>got a plaque that said, you know that they were

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the first member of the poly Market Pledge class. And

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, a lawsuit that was filed last week made

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 3>similar allegations pertaining to Polymarkers activities on other campuses.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard about anything else like that with Calshief

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps or is it just is were those learning events.

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 3>CALCI had some much smaller, much less well funded partnerships

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 3>with campus groups. I would say Polymarket is the prime

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 3>mover in that space when it comes to recruiting college students.

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Getting kids into gambling. That's my statement. This is all

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>truly horrible. Have you So the one thing as we

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>wrap up here, one thing that I keep coming back

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to is are there not guidelines around truth and advertising

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that these crossover with?

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so the Federal Trade Commission, which got advertising, does

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 4>have rules that require that advertisements be truthful and accurate.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 4>And then the CFTC also requires that you know, marketing

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 4>and that information not be this active. So there are

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 4>laws from at least two federal regulators that you know,

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 4>do touch on how prediction markets market themselves to the public.

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That's but they don't appear to I just I keep

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking about these videos, and I've had the animated gift

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just in the corner as I talk to you, and

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I don't see how there's not anything being

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>done about this, because even in a very conservative government,

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of vice that could genuine in

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, could genuinely cause a form of financial crisis

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with young people, especially at a time when young people

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>have trouble accumulating wealth.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, we don't know like entirely what's happening

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 4>on a regulatory fund. Again, we've reported that the CFTC

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 4>has some sort of investigation ongoing into Polymarket, although we

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 4>don't know the scope or details of that, And just

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 4>from you know, myself covering crypto for the last many years,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, often federal inquiry is when they happen, can

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 4>take many years. And so I think, you know, a

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of a lot of these platforms are very new,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 4>and so I don't think we necessarily know, you know, how,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 4>if and how from avacuatory perspective, things might unfold.

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 3>I should add here as well that you know, both

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Polymarket and its primary competitor, Calcy have ties to the

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>White House in the form of involvement from Donald Trump Junior.

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 3>So Donald Trump Junior is a strategic advisor to cal

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 3>she he is, through an investment fund UH an investor

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 3>in Polymarket. We don't have any reporting to suggest that

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 3>that has played any kind of role in the regulator's

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 3>willingness or unwillingness to take on prediction markets.

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 2>But I think that you know, that's important to mention here.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I also I will say I would

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>buy that they like doing this because it makes things

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>easier for them. But I also think there's just no

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>regulatory enforcement at the moment. It's just like it feels

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we're just in a regulatory vacuum where the damage is

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to come not so much from what happens, but

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't happen. What there isn't an aggress Like we

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like the FTC could cut in here at some point.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it feels that the SEC could do something,

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But to your point earlier around crypto, it feels that

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>when Gary Gensler left the SEC, that was kind of

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of any serious crypto regulation anyway, which would

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have likely led to regulating this. Yeah.

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're obviously extremely interested in what, if any

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 3>actions regulators will take on this, and we plan to

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 3>continue reporting and try to find out more about what's

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>going on behind the scenes here.

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, any closing thoughts, anything left off from the

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>industry that I haven't gone over because this has been

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>wonderful and also truly darkened my heart, Like I'm gonna

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>need to take a walk around the floor.

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh and I'm so sorry I hear that.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>No, No, it's not your fault. It's been a very

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>entertaining episode, but just this whole story is so grim.

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 4>It's it's it's a feeling I understand. I mean, I

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 4>think what what really like stuck with me through all

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 4>of this reporting was like just how good the videos

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 4>were at reporting to be on CALLI market And yeah,

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 4>I like it gave me a bunch of anxiety for

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, family members who are younger and even myself,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 4>but more than you know, like how hard this is

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 4>to actually know is what you're watching, you know, truly

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 4>something real or is it, you know, deceptive in some

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of manner. And so that's that's what that's been

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 4>what's stuck with me.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does feel like social media is becoming increasingly

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fake in that way.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Yeah, I would, I would underscore what Caitlin said.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 3>That is also something that has really been resonating with me.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 3>And I would just add that, you know, if any

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 3>of your listeners have experiences with prediction markets, we'd love

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.239
<v Speaker 3>to hear from them, and our contact information is on

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>our author pages on WSJ dot com.

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Well as we wrap up, when where can people find you?

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Find us?

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 3>In the Wall Street Journal if you're if you're a

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 3>print head, you know, we still publish in print, but

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 3>otherwise it's it's WSJ dot com.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 4>We live in on social media right now, so you

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 4>can give.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Us two Yeah, where are you at? You on Twitter

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and Blue Skull just Twitter, Where can we find you?

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm on Twitter at by k Long and on Blue

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>sky at you know, I don't.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember.

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>My book.

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Of my socials is Cetra, so I like should be

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 4>about like Kaylin has.

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Kaitlin has the best nominative determinism initials of all time.

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Her initials are CEO and she is our boss.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 4>No, Neil is our boss.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Big shot to Neil for finding POI market, I am,

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of course said zechon. I'll be back with a monologue

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. You can of course bet on this on goot.

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Each goot is worth a thousand slubs, so make sure

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to invest your slubs based on the number of times

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I said THEE in this episode. That will of course

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>funnel into a It's an account in the Cayman Islands

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I have. It's fully legal. I've checked with many lawyers,

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>several of which haven't been disbarred. This has, of course

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>been Better Offline. I am your host at Zetron. Thank

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you for listening. Thank you for listening to Better Offline

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is Mattosowski. You can check out more of his music

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and audio projects at Mattasowski dot com m A T

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>T O. S O w Ski dot com. You can

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>email me at easy at Better offline dot com or

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>visit better Offline dot com to find more podcast links

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend you

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>go to chat dot Where's your heead dot at to

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>visit the discord, and go to our slash Better Offline

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to check out I'll Reddit. Thank you so much for listening.

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website Coolzonemedia

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or check

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 3>you get your podcasts.