WEBVTT - Cathie Wood Sees Bitcoin Going to $500,000

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone. I'm Carol Masser Bloomberg, Business Week, Radio and TV,

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm delighted to bring in Kathy Would. She's the founder, CEO,

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment officer of ARC Investment LLC. She is

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who is well known to our audience. Her consistent

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>performance since she started ARC about seven years ago has

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly given her a lot of notoriety. Kathy, first of all,

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us. I know it's a crazy day.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We're all watching the markets. We're all watching bitcoin in

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a big way. The crypto market is coming undone last

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>trade was about thirty five thousand on bitcoin. What's happening

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>right now and how low do you think it can go? Well,

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in a risk off period and for

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>for all assets. If you if you look at the

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>stock market, the more risky or volatile parts of the

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>market have come in dramatically since mid February. And I

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the concerns have been around inflation.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Initially that was helping bitcoin because obviously Bitcoin is in

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a very important inflation hedge. You know, it's a it's

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a rules based monetary policy, the first global rules based

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy we have ever had. Hugely important reserve currency

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the crypto acid ecosystem. But I think what's happening

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>right now is because the stock market, the highly volatile

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>part of the stock market, the innovation oriented part of

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, has gone through such a correction which

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>has been flamed by inflation fears. I think, I think

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the correlations among volatile assets are going to one right now,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's including bitcoin. Well, I want to unpack a

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. So bitcoin, I mean you, at one point,

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think back in April told Dow Jones that it

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>could go to about five thousand dollars. Do you still

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>hold that target? Do you still think that's where we're headed?

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I we do. I do, yes. Cn L. Mandra is

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>our crypto analysts, and and uh we we go through

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>soul searching times like this and and scrape the models,

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and yes, our conviction is as high. The one thing

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that has changed here, however, is the environmental concerns around

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin in particular, have caused people like Elon Musk to

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>pull away and say, who wha what whoa? Let me,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>let me, let me make sure I understand this. And uh,

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we believe that even this is going to change because

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>first of all, right, now, UH, the percentage of bitcoin

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>mind with renewables and hydroelectric power is quite substantial. I

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>think in China it's over fifty in renewables. UH. And

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we also believe UH and we wrote a paper in

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>conjunction with Square on this and we're going to have

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a conference about it in July. We believe that bitcoin

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>mining integrated into the distributed grid, and by that I

0:02:53.200 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>mean solar roofs, power walls in homes. UH, utilities, power

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>producers starting to include bitcoin mining in the ecosystem. Why

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>would they do that? They would do it because renewables

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are intermittent power sources, right, whether is it sunny or not,

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>wind is it windy or not? And bitcoin mining could

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>take off if it's If there's excess energy uh from

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>solar being loaded into power walls, it can be offloaded

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>into bitcoin mining and the whole ecosystem therefore becomes much

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more economic if this happens. We believe that the the

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>adoption of solar is going to accelerate dramatically because there's

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>another profit center associated with it, bitcoin mining. Well, what

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>happens though in the meantime, so here we are at

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty five thousand, Kathy, do you think we go much

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lower from here? Uh? You never know how low is low.

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>When a market gets very emotional, A lot of traders

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>see bitcoin dropping below the two under day moving average,

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which is which was a uh so traders once that happened,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they just dumped. Some just dump and run. I think

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we're in a capitulation phase. Ya. Seen has a dashboard.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>We were looking at all the indicators this morning. They

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are all suggesting that we are in the capitulation phase,

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>which is a really great time to buy, no matter

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what the asset is. A capitulation phase is by it's

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on sale now. Am I saying thirty five thousand is

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the low? You know, if traders and there are a

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of speculators in in bitcoin, if they are running

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>for the hills just because bitcoin has broken through a

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>moving average that is important to them. It could continue.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But all of our indicators are saying this is capitulation

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. Do you have a low point on your

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>model for bitcoin? No, these metrics are are more a measure.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Are we in a truly capitulation phase? And it's very detailed. Yes.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Seen uses on chain analysis, which this is the only

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>asset where you can see exactly who's doing what, when,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>why and how, and all of those metrics are saying

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a capitulation. This is as as bad as

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it got during the coronavirus crisis. So what about systemic concerns?

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not talking about bringing down the financial system,

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>but you know, more and more of kind of the

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>establishment are getting involved in bitcoin. A lot more companies

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have bitcoin on their balance sheet. Should we be concerned

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about their exposure? Tesla for one, but others yes, yes,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>well they're usually in the case of Square and Tesla,

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>there between five and eight percent of their cash is

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin. So I don't think so that's no cause

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for concern. I'm think about it. We were worried that

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>Tesla would run out of cash. Of course ARC was

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not worried, but the world was worried two years ago

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that it would run out of cash. It has so

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>much cash now that has the luxury to put five

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to eight percent in in Bickwood. So, uh. Micro Strategy

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is another company. It has almost all as cash and bitcoin.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That's that's perhaps something prints you know, But as I said,

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>if we are in the capitulation phase, we shouldn't be

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>worried about micro strategy either. Uh. We do believe this

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is a new asset class and that institutions they are

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>looking at it right now because the correlations of relative

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>returns and total returns to compare to other asset classes

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>tends to be very low over time, and so they

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>have to look at it now. E s G might

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>prevent a move in wholesale, but we do believe that

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>once they understand how renewables are becoming incorporated into the

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin mining ecosystem uh, and that bitcoin mining might accelerate

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the adoption of solar UH. And I think Ellen will

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>come back and be a part of that ecosystem as well.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So why do you think he came out and said,

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, maybe I'm going to back off a bitcoin. Um.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think his concerned was? What was his nervousness? Well,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he moved in because he's been thinking, watching

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>like we all have, basically unhinged monetary policies. They're not

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>tied to anything anymore. Whereas bitcoin is mathematically meter to

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>top out at twenty one million units and we're approaching

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen million now, so the scarcity factor should increase and

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>support the price. We do believe that is what is

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be supporting the price in here. I believe

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened after he took the position in bitcoin is

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he got pushed back from institutional shareholders like black Rock.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>If you've got Larry Fink, you know, beating the drum

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on climate change as one of the most important topics

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and problems of our time, Uh, then uh, he was

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>going to have to face those sorts of concerns. I

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think he expected that. And now that he's sorting

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it out, learning more about the environmental impact, I think

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll come back into the mix. We certainly hope he will. Uh.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's going to be part of

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the conference in in July or not. It would be

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>he would be a very good addition because I think

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he would provide both sides of the equation. How quickly

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>could the adoption of solar accelerate if we introduced mining

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>into that ecosystem? Do you expect a bitcoin e t

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>F to get approved anytime soon? And I'm curious if

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you plan to launch a crypto et F anytime soon?

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think with well now that uh Gary

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Gensler is head of the SEC. UH he's bitcoin friendly.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>We know that he taught a class. Uh. Of course,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>of course is at M I t we're coming back

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to the SEC, so and I think the research um

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>uh professionals at the SEC. Uh, they understand bitcoin in

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>particular and uh, and I think are much more comfortable

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with it now that we've had several years to digest

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what exactly it is. Go through a bear market, go

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>through a bull market, now go through a bit of

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a bear market. I think watching uh, the ecosystem evolve

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and actually become even more anti fragile. You know, we're

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>getting some real tests here. And if the system doesn't break,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it will, I think that their

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>comfort will increase in a couple of ways. Number One,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure is there, is robust. Number two, the liquidity

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is there. Uh, I don't think. I don't think that's

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be disproven here. And number three, the price

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is down from very lofty levels. So hey, why not

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>start an et F after a correction in in the

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>market than before. So I actually think the odds are

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>going up now that we've had this correction. I don't

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>know if it's going to be this year or not.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>We here perhaps fourth quarter, but you know we heard

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a third quarter before that, so as we get closer

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to the fourth quarter, will know how much is being

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>pushed out. Hey, I want to ask Fee a bit

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>more about Tesla. Obviously, you know you've been at their

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>front and center years ahead when everybody was turning their

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>backs on Tesla taking another hit the news out of China.

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>They have certainly had some tough time. Their growth is

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>sload substantially. They've had a lot of headaches uh and

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and protests in Shanghai after some accidents with its cars.

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Is the Chinese market at risk for Tesla? I think

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese mark China is going to favor its local

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>producers like Neo and others xpang uh. And I think

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they're granting subsidies to Neo, which is the battery swap company,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>even on its very high end cars, which they are

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>not granting to Tesla. So it's obvious, and it has

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>always been obvious that China would favor a local producer.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But what we are seeing from China and particularly Tesla

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is exports into Europe uh where it does not yet

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have a plant. Uh. And what we're hearing is uh,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the especially in Germany but all over Europe where their

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>their standards are extremely high for cars in terms of

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>design and performance, that they would prefer cars from Shanghai,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a much newer plant and much more productive,

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>much more efficient in terms of these designer perfecting these

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>designs than is Fremont. Uh and So I think we're

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing a big export market developed from China into Europe.

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh and Uh. I think China will like that. China

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to be known not for shipping or exporting you know,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>cheap goods, but also high end good So this could

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be the beginning of a trend. So so is China

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>risk then for Tesla? I mean as I don't think

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going to shut down the factory at all. I

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think that that factory will be much more for exporting

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>than we once imagined. I will say that Tesla's cars

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in in China have sold very well until very recently.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the publicity, uh, the publicity it has received

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has cooled cooled uh Tesla's jets in China, but it's

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been fortuitous that this export market has opened up

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Kept the one thing I want

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, and we talked about it at the

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>beginning inflation, your mentor, you and I talked about this

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just a few weeks ago. Art Laugher, you were in

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>your twenties, you know, you were focusing on the economy.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a time where inflation was off the charts,

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and everybody thought it would consistently stay that way. Laugher

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thought differently, And we know well known in the supplied

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>side economics. Here we are at another time where the markets,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the volatility is often guided by our inflation expectations. Is

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation going to be a problem in your view? Well, uh,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we we've been saying for some time, actually since the

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>depths of the coronavirus. We were doing YouTube videos, uh,

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>saying regularly v shape recovery businesses are way behind consumers.

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Consumers are buying all of these goods. In fact, that's

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>all they can do because they're stuck at home. Right,

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So they were buying non durable and durable goods that

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>could be shipped to them, right, Uh right, Non, Okay,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>That part of consumption is one third of consumption, and

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a disproportionate amount or percentage of the market basket of

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>consumers was in goods. For the past year. Businesses were

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't expect it. They were behind even before the coronavirus.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>They had been lagging in terms of capital spending, in

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of inventories. They were worried about inverted deal curves

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and China US trade conflict. There were many, many concerns.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>So they've been dragging their feet. They got even further behind.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and still haven't caught up. So what's happening now,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Double triple ordering, maybe quadruple ordering, because they just can't

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>get the good companies kind of bying to thank buying.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And so what I believe is we are setting up

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for a massive period of deflation. Uh Now, let me

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>explain that there are three sources of deflation. One is

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.119
<v Speaker 1>when the orders, these double and triple orders are canceled.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we have seen lumber correct in the last week.

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the beginning of that. Copper is

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>now starting to correct. And I believe that commodity prices

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>went too far too fast as businesses were scrambling and panicking.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Right they were losing business to competition if they hadn't

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>planned their inventories correctly. So that's one source of deflation.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's only cyclical deflation. And we actually didn't expect

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it to start now. We expected it to start later

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in the year. But I guess it makes sense now

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that vaccines are here and consumers are shifting away from

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>goods towards services or at the margin. Uh, the writing

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is on the wall. Those are double and triple orders

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to be canceled. Prices were too high, and

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we're probably going to see a d up in commodities.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But there are two other sources of deflation out there,

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is what we've been saying for quite some time.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>One has to do with it's a good deflation. It's

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>caused by technologically enabled innovation. And we believe when you

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>see DNA sequencing costs dropping for every cumulative doubling in

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in genome sequenced, or when you see AI training costs

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>dropping thirty seven to fifty per year, these are massive

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>deflationary forces that are going to hit every part of

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy. AI is going to be everywhere. So that's

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>good deflation. Now what's bad deflation. Bad deflation is going

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to hit those companies that are going to be disinter

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>intermediated and disrupted by all of the innovation that we

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the time based on DNA sequencing, robotic

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>energy storage, artificial intelligence, and blockchain technology. So companies who

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have leveraged up to satisfy short term or ated shareholders

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>who say I want my profits now, I want my

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>dividends now, so they buy back their shares, they haven't

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>been investing enough in innovation. They are gonna lose if

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not lucky, not if there If they are unlucky,

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>they will lose their businesses. So, Cathie, what I like

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about you at your consistency and we have been talking

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about these themes right for a long time. Having said that,

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, your performance has been really consistent. It's been

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a tougher year this year, and you've had flows out

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of your funds. I was tracking just I think over

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the last week it's almost a billion dollars. So, you know,

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you keep your investors kind of energized in

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>your philosophy and your thinking and your outlook and confident

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in your strategy, you know, in a moment where there's

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of doubt out there. Yes, well, a couple

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of things, just in terms of flows in our our

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>biggest outflows were in March. There are a lot of

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>commentators out there, shall I say, screaming about how e

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>t f s would have to our our e t

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>f s would have to shut down, which is impossible.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And they just don't understand the E t f uh

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure surrounding us. Um, it's a beautiful thing. Let me

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you, the flows are no problem. Our spreads have

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not moved. But anyway, beyond that, Um, what has happened

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is our price targets for the next five years, that's

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>our investment time horizon have not changed, right, Uh, but

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>not at all. Yeah. Not. In fact, some of them

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.239
<v Speaker 1>have gone up as quarterly results have come out. Now

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to change that much because that one

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>quarters result is not going to change a five year

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>price target by that much. But the forces that the

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus put in motion supporting all of the innovation, uh,

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that in which we invest, they are not they're not

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>looking back. Uh. And so what we are seeing is,

0:18:55.600 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a thirty to forty discount to peak prices

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in in February for the same price targets. So we're

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at this saying, all right, on sale. Innovation is

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on sale. And oh, by the way, the bull market

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>has broadened out, it has it is now embracing value

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and more cyclical stocks. So what has happened is the

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>bull market has broadened, has strengthened, and that is using

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>usually a launching pad for our next move up. This

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>happened if I can just say two thousand sixteen, same thing,

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter of sixteen, after Trump, against all expectations, was elected. Uh,

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>value stocks took off because we're gonna have a big

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>cycle tax cuts, right, and our strategy went down. We

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>were negative. But what happened was two thousand seventeen was

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>one of our best years ever, saved last year. Uh,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's because the bull market had broadened out, include

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>did value cyclicals were taking off, and the economy was

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>on the end. Our economy is very strong right now,

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and cyclical earnings growth and revenue growth is a competition

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to innovation. But if we're right on what's happening with

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices right now, and that's going to be extended,

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that is the ticket to the next move in our

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stocks. Well, it's interesting too, what about the

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the tech underperformance, Kathy, that we've seen how much longer

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>do you think you know we see that? Well, you

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 1>can never say when we've hit bottom. I mean, I

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that the valuations in in our in

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>our portfolios would suggest that over the next five years, again,

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>if our research is correct, no promises. Uh, we believe

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that our portfolios will more than triple over the next

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>five years, so that more than a twenty five compound

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>annual rate of return over the next five years. Actually

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's approaching thirty after today. Uh. So you know I'm

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at that with great confidence because these innovation platforms

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have hit escape velocity and they there is no turning back.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>There is no turning back because they are helping businesses

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>uh and consumers back. Ye little free Sorry, there we go.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>You're back. Go ahead, No, that's okay, we're phrasing up.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead. Please, We're not going back to the old

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>world We're not going back to the old worlds. So

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, my confidence has only increased in our strategies.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you why did you guys get out

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of Apple? Your position in Apple? Okay, what we do

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>when a bull market is as extended as as the

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.239
<v Speaker 1>move into our type of stock was, is as that

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>move happens, we start, Uh, we're freezing up a little bit.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if we can get Cathy back. That's okay.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Innovation it's happening, but not always when it comes to that.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>The virtual conversation go ahead, and you're talking about Apple.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So Apple was one of our cash like instruments. It's

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>an innovative company. Uh, it's in in in the innovation zone,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's characteristics are very defensive. So we will add

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>names like Apple, the things Apple, Google, Facebook, we will

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>add those, uh, add to those positions or even reintroduce

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>those stocks as a bull market our our portfolios. We're

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>up a hundred and fifty. We knew there was going

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to be a correction and we just wanted to have

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>very liquid stocks. Apple is a great company, is going

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to do fine. Uh, it's a fang. It's in a

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of portfolios. We are all about the next fangs,

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but we will use the existing thangs. If you see

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they are acting very defensively, become a defensive group. So

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we will fold them in increase them. When we see

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a move like we saw last year. When we see

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a decline like the one we're seeing now, we're seeing

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>much higher returns from the other stocks in our portfolio.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're talking about um kind of value and cyclical,

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious, are there any value and cyclical strategies

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>right now that you guys have identified as one you

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>want to pursue. Well, in our space strategy r k X,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you'll find a lot of value oriented stocks. Uh. Many

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>people are surprised to see dear for example, in there,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And what they don't understand is thanks to satellite technology

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and UH. And and that the increase in the number

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of satellites out there and the and the precision that

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we're getting from them, we are now enabling precision agriculture

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with autonomous tractors and drones. So without without that constellation

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>out there, that would not be happening. We think that

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the two biggest applications or are beneficiaries of the space

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>race are satellites going to enable mobile connectivity or connectivity

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>around the world, broadband conductivity. It is really hard for

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>us to imagine that three billion people in the world

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have no access to the Internet or broadband. This is

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>going to enable that satellites and also farming. UH. And

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the other thing we think is is going to happen

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>much sooner than space tourism or it will be a

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>much bigger deal into of revenue generation is hypersonic flight.

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So any aerospace company focused on hypersonic flight we're interested in.

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And there they tend to be the coasts you mentioned earlier.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>There have been people who have been very vocal and

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>public fans of you, and then some now have become

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your critics or they criticize you know, having a younger investment,

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know a group of analysts, your analyst team,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you say to them? I would say, that's

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>our secret weapon. Those analysts have their uh, their education

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and their feet in the New world. The most seasoned

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>analysts healthcare analysts on Wall Street, and God bless them,

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>they've been great at what they do anything. They know

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>all the code words and how to decipher them from

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the FDA, but they probably haven't experimented with Cristopher gene

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>editing like our genomic analysts have, and they don't have

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>advanced degrees in cognitive computing, including bringing behavioral science into it.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So uh, many of our analysts are coming to us

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>directly from college, and they are fully equipped with domain

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>expertise in a way that most analysts out there. Again,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>very seasoned are not just because they didn't go to

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>school and haven't been exposed to these new technologies. Now.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I know there are a lot of PhD s out there,

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and they of course know a lot. But I would

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>put any of our analysts up against the most seasoned

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>analysts on the street when it comes to the topic

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of innovation and new technologies, right, that's our focus, and

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>so why wouldn't we. I think we have a competitive

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>advantage for a few reasons. Number one are analysts their

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>domain expertise. Uh Number two are their willingness to engage

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>with the communities out there through social media and give

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>our research away not one of finish but as it's evolving,

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so that they can communicate and engage with the innovators themselves.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, I think we have a competitive dynamic unmatched

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>out there in the industry. Hey, just to wrap up, Kathy,

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and you've you're not been talking for for a lot

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>of years. This has kind of been a year that's unusual.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I would I would say, in some regards for you,

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what have you learned in the past year and what

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has maybe change mean to you? Well, As we were

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>having such an incredible year last year, and I do

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>think the coronavirus crisis caused it innovation solves problems. I

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>kept saying to everyone, this will not everyone in the company.

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>We must stay humble. We must stay humble, and we

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>must we we know this is going to come to

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>an end. We're going to go through a severe correction,

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and we have to just keep our heads down, focused

0:27:55.720 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on our research to uh to keep our conviction and

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and and drive our strategies forward. That's what's happened, keeping

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>our heads down, hopefully staying humble, and really trying to

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>educate people the great opportunities available out there get on

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the right side of change. This is going to be

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the most amazing period of my investment career and I've

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>been through forty plus years, because we've never seen five

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>innovation platforms evolved at the same time, all of them

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>leading to exponential growth trajectories that are going to transform

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>people's lives. And so I say, just you know, uh, uh,

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>read our research, uh, talk to our analysts on Twitter

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>if you really want to learn more and and and

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>join the ride, because we believe it's going to be magnificent.

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly from the audience, do you ever get recognized

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.239
<v Speaker 1>in public like a celebrity? Some people like you need

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to Warren Buffett and do you ever miss kind of

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>your pre rock star Day's just quickly Um, the answer

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is yes, too much to my surprise, even in an

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>island off of New Zealand, which is what uh but

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>UH and no, we are honored and delighted because you

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, and I know it's been hard for our

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>clients in recent months keep the faith, but many people's

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lives have been changed by what happened last year. They

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>put their uh, they allocated resources towards our strategies, towards

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and UH, and they had a magnificent run. So

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gratitude that we feel now. Of course we're feeling

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>very responsible of course this year, but that's why it's

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>so important for us to say. You know what pains

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>me more than anything as a portfolio manager is when

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I know our clients are selling at the bottom, and

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it usually is that people sell the big capitulation that

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I described earlier with bitcoin is selling at the bottom,

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so you make a terrible mistake and you don't want

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to ever get in again. And it just pains me.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just praying that we don't have a lot

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of that. We've had a lot of retention. Just to

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>correct one thing you said at the beginning. Uh, Actually,

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as a firm, we've not had one month of redemptions.

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>The E t F platform had if you go month

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>end to month end, which is how we measure this

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Our regions in March were five million.

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>We had we we've had positive flows in April. May.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It remains to be seen. It's been nip and Tucket

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>may end up being a small depends on what happens

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in these last few weeks. But you know, if there's

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>real capitulation, sure we could have a big outflow, but

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's capitulation.