WEBVTT - Ep 221 Electroconvulsive Therapy Part 2: A current conversation

0:00:00.070 --> 0:00:03.090
<v Speaker 1>So this patient was actually five at the time that

0:00:03.310 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>she was diagnosed. She presented initially with seizures, was diagnosed

0:00:08.420 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>with epilepsy, was sent home from a hospital, and then

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>came back with unusual movements and mutism and was diagnosed

0:00:16.820 --> 0:00:19.750
<v Speaker 1>by the team there with catatonia, which is a psychiatric

0:00:19.790 --> 0:00:22.829
<v Speaker 1>syndrome that we see across a variety of illnesses, both

0:00:22.890 --> 0:00:27.930
<v Speaker 1>psychiatric and medical. That provoked a further medical workup, including

0:00:28.290 --> 0:00:31.410
<v Speaker 1>lumbar puncture, spinal tap, and she was found to have

0:00:31.650 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>what is known as anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. This condition is

0:00:36.900 --> 0:00:40.739
<v Speaker 1>frequently characterized by the things I just mentioned, seizures, catatonia,

0:00:40.820 --> 0:00:45.699
<v Speaker 1>other psychiatric symptoms, and is treated with a combination of

0:00:45.729 --> 0:00:49.290
<v Speaker 1>immunotherapies to deal with the overactivity of the immune system,

0:00:49.950 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>and also sort of conventional treatments to manage seizures, catatonia, etc.,

0:00:54.590 --> 0:01:00.410
<v Speaker 1>This patient received immunotherapy, many immunotherapies actually, and received lorazepam

0:01:00.450 --> 0:01:03.540
<v Speaker 1>or Ativan, which is the standard medication that we give

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for catatonia, to very, very high doses and continued to

0:01:07.580 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>receive these treatments over the course of Of about nine months.

0:01:11.970 --> 0:01:15.569
<v Speaker 1>And after that nine-month period, she remained very catatonic. She

0:01:15.610 --> 0:01:18.610
<v Speaker 1>could not speak. She could not dress herself, which she'd

0:01:18.630 --> 0:01:21.050
<v Speaker 1>been able to do previously. She could not feed herself.

0:01:21.130 --> 0:01:24.310
<v Speaker 1>She required a gastrostomy tube or a feeding tube for

0:01:24.350 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all her feeding. She required total care from her family

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.590
<v Speaker 1>and from the nursing staff. And so at that time,

0:01:31.610 --> 0:01:34.690
<v Speaker 1>the team at the hospital where she was a patient

0:01:34.709 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time started discussing the possibility of treating her

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>with ECT. ECT is a gold standard treatment for catatonia,

0:01:42.540 --> 0:01:47.309
<v Speaker 1>has very high response rates across all causes of catatonia,

0:01:47.390 --> 0:01:51.820
<v Speaker 1>both psychiatric and medical. However, it is not typical to

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.540
<v Speaker 1>treat ECT in patients so young, in part because it's

0:01:54.580 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not typical to see catatonia in patients so young, or anyway,

0:01:57.860 --> 0:02:01.050
<v Speaker 1>it has not been recognized in patients so young historically.

0:02:01.070 --> 0:02:04.130
<v Speaker 1>It's almost certainly been under-recognized. So it would have been

0:02:04.150 --> 0:02:07.990
<v Speaker 1>unusual to treat a patient this age with ECT. But

0:02:08.050 --> 0:02:09.430
<v Speaker 1>they had sort of run out of options. They had

0:02:09.470 --> 0:02:13.130
<v Speaker 1>given her many, many doses of immunotherapies that are also

0:02:13.190 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>used as chemotherapeutic agents that have their own side effects

0:02:15.900 --> 0:02:18.380
<v Speaker 1>that had treated her with very high dose lorazepam, as

0:02:18.460 --> 0:02:22.060
<v Speaker 1>I said. And so the decision was made to transfer

0:02:22.100 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>her to our hospital, of course, with the consent of

0:02:24.380 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>her parents, to treat her with ECT. That was the

0:02:27.780 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>youngest case that we've treated, one of the youngest cases

0:02:30.660 --> 0:02:34.770
<v Speaker 1>in the literature. We began treatment of her nine months

0:02:34.910 --> 0:02:39.430
<v Speaker 1>into her illness. And after about eight weeks, her catatonia

0:02:39.470 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>had resolved entirely. She was speaking again, walking again. She

0:02:44.100 --> 0:02:47.739
<v Speaker 1>was able to play games with her hands and draw

0:02:47.930 --> 0:02:50.510
<v Speaker 1>and play. blow bubbles and all these things. So we,

0:02:50.810 --> 0:02:53.169
<v Speaker 1>in fact, had her well enough to eat again. So

0:02:53.210 --> 0:02:56.530
<v Speaker 1>she had come in September and we got her eating

0:02:56.870 --> 0:02:59.010
<v Speaker 1>enough just in time for Thanksgiving dinner. So she was

0:02:59.070 --> 0:03:01.490
<v Speaker 1>able to eat a full Thanksgiving with her family, which

0:03:01.510 --> 0:03:04.470
<v Speaker 1>is very exciting for us. So it's just a testament

0:03:04.550 --> 0:03:08.970
<v Speaker 1>to the power of the treatment, particularly for catatonia and

0:03:09.250 --> 0:03:13.450
<v Speaker 1>sort of a reminder that we do have this treatment

0:03:13.470 --> 0:03:16.630
<v Speaker 1>available for anyone who needs it. And we should always

0:03:16.669 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about it in these cases. Thank you. Dr.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Lopez, thank you so much for sharing that story with us.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>It still blows my mind.

0:04:09.020 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:04:09.820 --> 0:04:12.380
<v Speaker 2>And there's a full episode on it and the Advances

0:04:12.540 --> 0:04:15.770
<v Speaker 2>in Care podcast, so go check it out. But Whoa.

0:04:16.170 --> 0:04:16.390
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:16.430 --> 0:04:18.620
<v Speaker 3>There's also a YouTube video, Erin, that you had sent me.

0:04:18.650 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.260
<v Speaker 3>That the hospital put together that's also really moving. And yeah,

0:04:22.300 --> 0:04:25.500
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for taking the time. And everyone,

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 3>you'll get to hear more from Dr. Lopez later in

0:04:27.620 --> 0:04:28.100
<v Speaker 3>the episode.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.229
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you will. Yes, you will. Hi, I'm Erin Welsh.

0:04:31.460 --> 0:04:32.670
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Erin Allman-Updike.

0:04:32.790 --> 0:04:34.750
<v Speaker 2>And this is This Podcast Will Kill You.

0:04:35.050 --> 0:04:36.270
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to ECT.

0:04:36.970 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Part two. ECT part two. If this is your first

0:04:40.940 --> 0:04:43.580
<v Speaker 2>time tuning in, check out last week's episode on the

0:04:43.620 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 2>history of ECT, helpful context. Is it necessary to understand

0:04:48.100 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>ECT today?

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it is. Definitely feel like it is.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:53.620
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Go listen to it if you haven't already.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:56.860
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:57.220 --> 0:04:59.340
<v Speaker 3>If you haven't already, then you might not know ECT

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 3>is electroconvulsive therapy.

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:01.539
<v Speaker 2>See?

0:05:01.860 --> 0:05:03.540
<v Speaker 3>There's important things you need to learn from that episode.

0:05:04.100 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:04.420 --> 0:05:05.659
<v Speaker 2>Pretty important. Pretty important.

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 3>But today we're going to be talking all about what

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.020
<v Speaker 3>is ECT? How does it actually work? How do we

0:05:11.140 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 3>use it today? And of course, we're going to be

0:05:13.700 --> 0:05:15.140
<v Speaker 3>interviewing an expert.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>That is Dr.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.670
<v Speaker 3>Leonardo Lopez, who is vice chair for inpatient services and

0:05:19.790 --> 0:05:23.310
<v Speaker 3>associate professor of clinical psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College.

0:05:23.550 --> 0:05:28.190
<v Speaker 3>And he oversees a lot of inpatient psychiatric services Including ECT.

0:05:28.330 --> 0:05:29.529
<v Speaker 2>Including ECT.

0:05:29.589 --> 0:05:29.849
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:30.740 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>It is really thrilling to get this actual expert to

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.700
<v Speaker 2>chat about this therapy that we've talked so much about.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah.

0:05:39.700 --> 0:05:40.900
<v Speaker 2>That'll be later in the episode.

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>But for now, we still have a few important things

0:05:42.980 --> 0:05:47.540
<v Speaker 2>to cover, such as... Like quarantini time. Quarantini time. This week,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.010
<v Speaker 2>as with last week, we are drinking Shock Talk. Shock Talk.

0:05:51.390 --> 0:05:56.110
<v Speaker 2>Which is grapefruit, ginger ale, basil. It's tasty. Yeah. Check

0:05:56.150 --> 0:05:59.390
<v Speaker 2>out our recipe online. On our website, thispodcastwillkillyou.com, as well

0:05:59.410 --> 0:06:01.830
<v Speaker 2>as on all of our social media channels. Follow us

0:06:01.870 --> 0:06:04.770
<v Speaker 2>if you're not already. Our website has lots of things.

0:06:04.830 --> 0:06:06.890
<v Speaker 2>If you listened to last week's episode, you know.

0:06:07.089 --> 0:06:07.630
<v Speaker 1>Check it out. You know.

0:06:07.870 --> 0:06:08.350
<v Speaker 3>Check it out.

0:06:08.730 --> 0:06:11.849
<v Speaker 2>Thispodcastwillkillyou.com. Rate, review, and subscribe. We're on YouTube.

0:06:11.990 --> 0:06:12.830
<v Speaker 1>Hi. Hi.

0:06:13.730 --> 0:06:15.090
<v Speaker 2>Shall we get into this? There's a lot to cover.

0:06:15.250 --> 0:06:17.110
<v Speaker 2>I would love to. Let's take a quick break and

0:06:17.390 --> 0:06:24.830
<v Speaker 2>get started. Okay. Hi.

0:06:32.740 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>So last week, Erin, you walked us through the history

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:41.219
<v Speaker 3>of ECT as a practice from the pretty gruesome. to

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.500
<v Speaker 3>the remarkably effective and kind of left off with where

0:06:45.940 --> 0:06:48.060
<v Speaker 3>are we now and kind of where do we go?

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 3>So my goal for today is to make ECT feel,

0:06:53.380 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>for so many of us who maybe have never witnessed

0:06:55.900 --> 0:06:59.370
<v Speaker 3>it or who have never experienced it, feel like something

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.350
<v Speaker 3>that is real, that we have a concept of in

0:07:02.430 --> 0:07:05.289
<v Speaker 3>our mind that we can visualize. Because I think for

0:07:05.410 --> 0:07:07.229
<v Speaker 3>so many of us, we might be able to picture

0:07:07.270 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 3>like what a surgery looks like. We might be able

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 3>to picture in our mind what it might be like

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.860
<v Speaker 3>to have to take a medication every day. But the

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.110
<v Speaker 3>images that we likely have of ECT, like you talked

0:07:18.130 --> 0:07:20.650
<v Speaker 3>about so much last week, Erin, they're tinged with so

0:07:20.830 --> 0:07:22.130
<v Speaker 3>much sensationalism.

0:07:22.150 --> 0:07:22.220
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:07:23.330 --> 0:07:26.090
<v Speaker 3>And it might be that one flew over the cuckoo's

0:07:26.130 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 3>nest is our best image of what ECT is. And

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.540
<v Speaker 3>that's not a picture of what it actually looks like

0:07:31.580 --> 0:07:34.630
<v Speaker 3>today at all. Correct. So what we're going to talk

0:07:34.650 --> 0:07:37.650
<v Speaker 3>about today is what this actually looks like as a

0:07:37.690 --> 0:07:41.350
<v Speaker 3>medical procedure, what the situations are that we use it

0:07:41.450 --> 0:07:44.590
<v Speaker 3>for today. And then, like I said already, at the end,

0:07:44.610 --> 0:07:46.590
<v Speaker 3>we're going to be joined by Dr. Leonardo Lopez to

0:07:46.650 --> 0:07:49.470
<v Speaker 3>talk about kind of the future of ECT.

0:07:49.770 --> 0:07:52.940
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot to cover. There really is.

0:07:54.140 --> 0:07:55.660
<v Speaker 3>Just a few things on the agenda.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:56.890 --> 0:07:58.740
<v Speaker 3>At the very top of last week's episode, Erin, you

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:03.260
<v Speaker 3>defined ECT for us. Electroconvulsive therapy is basically delivering electricity

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.820
<v Speaker 3>to our brain with the goal of provoking a seizure

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 3>to treat a variety, a really kind of wider variety

0:08:10.930 --> 0:08:14.430
<v Speaker 3>than you might think, of what we call affective disorders.

0:08:14.650 --> 0:08:17.990
<v Speaker 3>So those are things like treatment-resistant depression, which might mean

0:08:18.110 --> 0:08:21.610
<v Speaker 3>either unipolar depression, so that's things like major depressive disorder,

0:08:22.130 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 3>or bipolar depression. We also use it for psychotic disorders,

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 3>including psychotic depression, schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia, and catatonia and

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 3>related disorders, which we're going to talk about in a

0:08:34.740 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 3>lot more detail and can present in both more neurologic

0:08:37.950 --> 0:08:41.969
<v Speaker 3>and more kind of psychiatric conditions. But what does it

0:08:42.110 --> 0:08:45.970
<v Speaker 3>actually look like? So if you or I were going

0:08:46.030 --> 0:08:48.550
<v Speaker 3>to go get ECT, if we had a need for

0:08:48.570 --> 0:08:51.089
<v Speaker 3>this procedure, this is kind of the steps that we

0:08:51.130 --> 0:08:51.630
<v Speaker 3>would go through.

0:08:52.950 --> 0:08:53.350
<v Speaker 1>First.

0:08:53.950 --> 0:08:56.590
<v Speaker 3>There would be a very lengthy discussion of the risks

0:08:56.929 --> 0:09:00.830
<v Speaker 3>and the benefits of this procedure. The person who's performing

0:09:00.950 --> 0:09:03.130
<v Speaker 3>it would be talking with us. They would be talking

0:09:03.170 --> 0:09:06.370
<v Speaker 3>with our family or our friends and other like surrogate

0:09:06.390 --> 0:09:10.990
<v Speaker 3>decision makers if needed. There is a really robust informed

0:09:11.030 --> 0:09:14.770
<v Speaker 3>consent process that has to be gone through. Usually there's

0:09:14.850 --> 0:09:17.410
<v Speaker 3>also a general physical exam that has to be done

0:09:17.550 --> 0:09:20.540
<v Speaker 3>either by a primary care or hospitalist physician or sometimes

0:09:20.580 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 3>by a cardiologist. To make sure that our heart and

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 3>our body is overall healthy enough to withstand this procedure,

0:09:26.700 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>especially the anesthesia. We would then have to not eat

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.750
<v Speaker 3>anything for an entire night. And then the next morning,

0:09:34.870 --> 0:09:37.550
<v Speaker 3>we'd arrive to a room, either in a hospital or

0:09:37.650 --> 0:09:41.670
<v Speaker 3>an outpatient clinic, depending on the situation. We would be

0:09:41.690 --> 0:09:44.110
<v Speaker 3>wearing a hospital gown, like we always do for any

0:09:44.130 --> 0:09:47.190
<v Speaker 3>of these kinds of procedures. And we'd probably be greeted

0:09:47.270 --> 0:09:50.890
<v Speaker 3>by either a nurse or a technician and an anesthetist.

0:09:52.090 --> 0:09:54.300
<v Speaker 3>We'd get an IV put in our arm. We'd have

0:09:54.340 --> 0:09:57.020
<v Speaker 3>a blood pressure cuff. They'd take our vitals. Actually, they'd

0:09:57.059 --> 0:09:59.010
<v Speaker 3>put two blood pressure cuffs on, one on our arm

0:09:59.090 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and one on our right leg. We'll talk about why

0:10:01.710 --> 0:10:02.140
<v Speaker 3>in a second.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:02.469
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:10:03.090 --> 0:10:05.450
<v Speaker 3>And then while they're chatting with you, they'll start to

0:10:05.510 --> 0:10:07.330
<v Speaker 3>hook up a whole bunch of wires that they're going

0:10:07.350 --> 0:10:10.209
<v Speaker 3>to use for monitoring us. There'd be an EKG on

0:10:10.250 --> 0:10:13.590
<v Speaker 3>our chest to monitor our heart during the procedure. There'd

0:10:13.630 --> 0:10:17.430
<v Speaker 3>be an EEG on our head to monitor the seizure

0:10:17.470 --> 0:10:20.170
<v Speaker 3>in our brain. And there would be an EMG or

0:10:20.210 --> 0:10:23.069
<v Speaker 3>an electromyogram that would be placed on our right foot.

0:10:23.670 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you again why in a little bit.

0:10:25.620 --> 0:10:26.650
<v Speaker 2>Okay, the right foot, yeah.

0:10:26.740 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's to monitor the seizure in the muscle itself.

0:10:30.660 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>We'd probably get a little bit of extra oxygen via

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.020
<v Speaker 3>a mask. There might be a little thing put up

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.860
<v Speaker 3>our nose to monitor our CO2 levels, one of those

0:10:37.940 --> 0:10:40.540
<v Speaker 3>clippies on our finger to monitor our blood oxygen. And

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.239
<v Speaker 3>depending on what type of electrodes that are going to

0:10:44.260 --> 0:10:46.449
<v Speaker 3>be used for this procedure, we They might put those

0:10:46.490 --> 0:10:49.290
<v Speaker 3>on our head right now if they're the sticky kind,

0:10:49.590 --> 0:10:51.590
<v Speaker 3>or they might use the kind of more old school

0:10:51.610 --> 0:10:53.990
<v Speaker 3>kind that are handheld. In that case, you might not

0:10:54.030 --> 0:10:57.410
<v Speaker 3>see those yet. And then the anesthetist is going to

0:10:57.450 --> 0:10:59.630
<v Speaker 3>give us a medication that will put us to sleep.

0:10:59.809 --> 0:11:02.209
<v Speaker 3>There's a few different medicines that they use. They're pretty

0:11:02.250 --> 0:11:06.490
<v Speaker 3>standard anesthetics like Propofol or Atomidate. No one cares about

0:11:06.530 --> 0:11:11.270
<v Speaker 3>these names. Okay. Once you're unconscious then, that second blood

0:11:11.290 --> 0:11:13.610
<v Speaker 3>pressure cuff, the one around our ankle, our right.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:14.770
<v Speaker 2>Leg, is inflated.

0:11:15.490 --> 0:11:18.270
<v Speaker 3>The reason for this is that that's going to reduce

0:11:18.290 --> 0:11:21.390
<v Speaker 3>the amount of blood flow to our right foot. Not

0:11:21.429 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 3>cut it off completely, but reduce the amount of blood

0:11:23.660 --> 0:11:26.380
<v Speaker 3>flow to that foot. And then they're going to administer

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 3>another medication after we're unconscious. And this one is a

0:11:30.460 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 3>muscle relaxant. Usually it's something called succinylcholine. This kicks in

0:11:35.300 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty quickly. And you can tell when it's kicked in

0:11:37.980 --> 0:11:40.650
<v Speaker 3>because as you're administering it, it actually causes kind of

0:11:40.710 --> 0:11:43.790
<v Speaker 3>these twitchings, these little tremors in your muscles. And then

0:11:43.830 --> 0:11:47.329
<v Speaker 3>those tremors will stop. Once those tremors stop, it means

0:11:47.370 --> 0:11:52.130
<v Speaker 3>that the muscles are completely relaxed, okay? And then they're

0:11:52.150 --> 0:11:54.950
<v Speaker 3>going to put a bite block in your mouth, and

0:11:54.990 --> 0:11:56.550
<v Speaker 3>that's to protect your teeth and your tongue.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 2>And then they're going to.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.860
<v Speaker 3>Administer a very brief pulse of electricity via those electrodes

0:12:03.059 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 3>that either they stuck already onto your head or they're

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 3>holding onto your head. And by a very brief pulse

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 3>of electricity, I literally mean on the order of seconds

0:12:12.260 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>or sometimes even a half of a second of electricity.

0:12:15.179 --> 0:12:15.699
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:12:16.420 --> 0:12:19.569
<v Speaker 3>The amount of electricity specifically that they're going to deliver

0:12:19.630 --> 0:12:24.110
<v Speaker 3>depends on what your seizure threshold is. But the goal

0:12:24.210 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 3>is that it's enough electricity to cause a generalized seizure. Okay. Now,

0:12:29.420 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 3>this seizure is not going to be visible in your

0:12:32.020 --> 0:12:35.460
<v Speaker 3>muscles the way that a grand mal or a generalized

0:12:35.700 --> 0:12:39.450
<v Speaker 3>tonic-clonic seizure would be because all of your muscles are relaxed.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.650
<v Speaker 3>But what you will be able to see is the

0:12:41.690 --> 0:12:46.430
<v Speaker 3>seizure on EEG, which we're monitoring, and on EMG attached

0:12:46.470 --> 0:12:48.650
<v Speaker 3>to the right foot, which has less blood flow, so

0:12:48.670 --> 0:12:52.370
<v Speaker 3>has not been affected by the muscle relaxant succinylcholine. That

0:12:52.450 --> 0:12:55.790
<v Speaker 3>seizure is only going to last between 25 and 70 seconds.

0:12:56.410 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>That's how long the whole seizure itself should last. And

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>then that's it. The procedure is over. You're disconnected from

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.100
<v Speaker 3>all of your wires. The anesthetic will wear off within

0:13:06.140 --> 0:13:08.220
<v Speaker 3>a matter of minutes, maybe a half an hour, maybe

0:13:08.260 --> 0:13:10.589
<v Speaker 3>an hour. And then that's the end of the procedure.

0:13:11.610 --> 0:13:14.140
<v Speaker 3>And you'll be wheeled to the recovery room to wake up.

0:13:15.330 --> 0:13:19.850
<v Speaker 2>That was so helpful. Thank you. That was really great.

0:13:19.890 --> 0:13:23.140
<v Speaker 2>I worked actually really hard on that. So thank you. No,

0:13:23.130 --> 0:13:25.660
<v Speaker 2>it really was like a helpful contrast to like, okay,

0:13:25.700 --> 0:13:29.130
<v Speaker 2>what do we see on movies. When we hear this

0:13:29.190 --> 0:13:33.349
<v Speaker 2>in our head, what do we picture? Yeah. And it

0:13:33.429 --> 0:13:35.310
<v Speaker 2>is often a far cry. And so I think that

0:13:35.350 --> 0:13:36.910
<v Speaker 2>was really, really great.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:13:37.250 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. I have some questions. I know you have a

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:39.859
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions.

0:13:39.940 --> 0:13:40.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Give them to me.

0:13:41.300 --> 0:13:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:13:42.340 --> 0:13:44.860
<v Speaker 2>Right foot. Right foot. Why the right foot?

0:13:45.020 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:45.580 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's such a great question.

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:47.860
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 3>There's a few reasons for this. In part, it's not

0:13:50.660 --> 0:13:54.410
<v Speaker 3>completely random. To answer that question, I want to actually

0:13:54.510 --> 0:13:56.130
<v Speaker 3>answer first where we put the electrodes.

0:13:56.690 --> 0:13:56.930
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:13:57.070 --> 0:13:58.010
<v Speaker 2>Because then I'll be able to.

0:13:57.970 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Kind of like long way get to that question.

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:14:01.179 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:14:01.660 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.220
<v Speaker 2>So the electrodes are placed.

0:14:04.860 --> 0:14:06.750
<v Speaker 3>There's a few different ways that you can place the electrodes.

0:14:07.740 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 3>In most of the, like, media representations, the electrodes are

0:14:11.100 --> 0:14:13.579
<v Speaker 3>placed on the temples, on both of them. So kind

0:14:13.620 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 3>of like if you draw an imaginary line from the

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.370
<v Speaker 3>corner of your eyes back to your ears, it's kind

0:14:17.380 --> 0:14:19.990
<v Speaker 3>of midway along that line just above it, right on

0:14:20.030 --> 0:14:23.850
<v Speaker 3>your temples. And that is kind of old school standard placement,

0:14:23.950 --> 0:14:27.130
<v Speaker 3>still used quite often, but not necessarily the.

0:14:27.150 --> 0:14:27.930
<v Speaker 2>First line placement.

0:14:28.350 --> 0:14:31.310
<v Speaker 3>Treatment option for a lot of people in the US today,

0:14:31.390 --> 0:14:35.190
<v Speaker 3>but that's a perfectly decent option. Sometimes instead of being

0:14:35.370 --> 0:14:38.030
<v Speaker 3>on the temporal, people will put them bifrontal. So like

0:14:38.110 --> 0:14:40.770
<v Speaker 3>on the forehead, kind of like outer corners of the eyebrows.

0:14:40.990 --> 0:14:41.250
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:14:41.770 --> 0:14:45.650
<v Speaker 3>But there's also another option and that is right unilateral placement.

0:14:46.310 --> 0:14:48.390
<v Speaker 3>And so this means that you'll have one electrode on

0:14:48.410 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the right side in that same like temporal position. And

0:14:51.700 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 3>then the other one just to the right of the

0:14:53.700 --> 0:14:56.620
<v Speaker 3>very top of your skull, right at the apex there.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.980
<v Speaker 3>A lot of times we start with this right lobe only,

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.850
<v Speaker 3>right unilateral placement because it's associated with a lower risk

0:15:04.910 --> 0:15:07.910
<v Speaker 3>of side effects. However, it tends to also be slightly

0:15:08.010 --> 0:15:12.210
<v Speaker 3>less effective than bilateral placement. The reason that they chose

0:15:12.350 --> 0:15:16.870
<v Speaker 3>initially to do right rather than left is because for

0:15:17.130 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 3>most people, like 98% of right-handed people and 70 to 90%

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.100
<v Speaker 3>of left-handed people, our language function is all on the

0:15:25.140 --> 0:15:27.860
<v Speaker 3>left temporal lobe. So the thought was that maybe there

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.100
<v Speaker 3>would be less side effects, especially with language, if we

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.180
<v Speaker 3>avoid direct current to that left temporal lobe.

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:34.860
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

0:15:35.530 --> 0:15:39.670
<v Speaker 3>But so the right foot, regardless of the position of

0:15:39.690 --> 0:15:43.670
<v Speaker 3>those electrodes, is a place that you can easily isolate

0:15:43.890 --> 0:15:47.420
<v Speaker 3>and is going to still have motor activity regardless of where.

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.780
<v Speaker 3>I mean, really, you should have motor activity anywhere. So

0:15:49.820 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I think right foot is just like that has become

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.460
<v Speaker 3>the standard of where you do it. It could be

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the left foot. Sometimes people use the arm if they

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:56.940
<v Speaker 3>have to. Let's say you don't have a right foot

0:15:56.980 --> 0:15:58.740
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. You can use something else.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:00.180 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:01.540
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.450
<v Speaker 3>I guess I didn't really need to answer the placement question.

0:16:04.540 --> 0:16:05.500
<v Speaker 2>No, but it was helpful.

0:16:05.730 --> 0:16:05.940
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:16:05.950 --> 0:16:10.470
<v Speaker 2>It was a helpful context. Interesting. The seizure threshold, how

0:16:10.550 --> 0:16:11.670
<v Speaker 2>is that determined?

0:16:11.690 --> 0:16:13.530
<v Speaker 3>I knew that you were going to ask that question.

0:16:13.890 --> 0:16:20.170
<v Speaker 3>So the seizure threshold means the lowest amount of electricity

0:16:20.390 --> 0:16:22.550
<v Speaker 3>that's going to give you a seizure.

0:16:22.750 --> 0:16:22.890
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:23.530 --> 0:16:26.950
<v Speaker 3>How we determine what that seizure threshold is kind of

0:16:26.990 --> 0:16:29.090
<v Speaker 3>depends on where you're going to be getting ECT and

0:16:29.150 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 3>how they're going to do it. There are like age-based

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.460
<v Speaker 3>guesstimates that we can use. The other thing that you

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 3>can do to try and estimate it is to start

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.490
<v Speaker 3>with a really low charge and then go up in

0:16:39.590 --> 0:16:42.290
<v Speaker 3>increments until you get to a seizure. And then you know, okay,

0:16:42.310 --> 0:16:45.770
<v Speaker 3>the threshold was somewhere in between the the most lowest

0:16:45.870 --> 0:16:47.510
<v Speaker 3>that didn't do it, and then this one that did.

0:16:48.350 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 3>But the key, actually, is that we're not just hitting

0:16:51.420 --> 0:16:55.540
<v Speaker 3>that seizure threshold. The goal is actually to give an

0:16:55.580 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>amount of electricity that's between two and a half to

0:16:58.220 --> 0:17:03.290
<v Speaker 3>five times that minimum seizure threshold. That, based on all

0:17:03.310 --> 0:17:05.510
<v Speaker 3>the data that we have, is what seems to be

0:17:05.550 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 3>the most effective for ECT. Two and a half if

0:17:08.900 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 3>you're doing bilateral. So two and a half times threshold

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.220
<v Speaker 3>for bilateral and about five times if you're doing only unilateral.

0:17:14.260 --> 0:17:17.950
<v Speaker 3>So you need a higher charge if you're doing unilateral placement.

0:17:18.330 --> 0:17:18.750
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:17:19.350 --> 0:17:19.629
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:17:20.250 --> 0:17:23.850
<v Speaker 2>This is, I think, maybe getting into like a bigger

0:17:23.890 --> 0:17:27.620
<v Speaker 2>question or like something that you will address. But you've

0:17:27.630 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 2>mentioned placement when it comes to efficacy or effectiveness. And

0:17:32.100 --> 0:17:37.850
<v Speaker 2>you've mentioned... the actual like stimulation provided yeah how do

0:17:37.869 --> 0:17:39.990
<v Speaker 2>we measure effectiveness what does that mean oh.

0:17:39.930 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 3>That's such a great question effectiveness is measured by resolution

0:17:43.900 --> 0:17:46.820
<v Speaker 3>of symptoms okay and so that's going to depend on

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.740
<v Speaker 3>what the thing is that you are treating but there's

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 3>usually like let's say that it's depression unipolar or bipolar

0:17:53.619 --> 0:17:56.409
<v Speaker 3>depression You've got a bunch of questionnaires that people are

0:17:56.430 --> 0:17:59.470
<v Speaker 3>being given on how bad their depressive symptoms are prior

0:17:59.510 --> 0:18:01.470
<v Speaker 3>to ECT. And then you're going to be giving those

0:18:01.510 --> 0:18:04.129
<v Speaker 3>same questionnaires after ECT. And that's how you're going to

0:18:04.190 --> 0:18:08.340
<v Speaker 3>judge how effective the ECT has been. You're also going

0:18:08.380 --> 0:18:11.659
<v Speaker 3>to be estimating side effects, right? So then you're always

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 3>going to be doing kind of a cost-benefit analysis. Did

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 3>we start with bilateral and we're having too many side effects? Well,

0:18:17.340 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 3>then maybe we want to switch to unilateral. Did we

0:18:19.500 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 3>start with unilateral and maybe we're not having as great

0:18:21.619 --> 0:18:23.300
<v Speaker 3>of an effect as we want? Then maybe we switch

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.429
<v Speaker 3>to bilateral. Okay.

0:18:25.450 --> 0:18:27.830
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that interesting? It is really interesting.

0:18:28.010 --> 0:18:30.130
<v Speaker 3>It is definitely one of these places where we talk

0:18:30.150 --> 0:18:32.030
<v Speaker 3>about this a lot. There is both art and science

0:18:32.090 --> 0:18:34.790
<v Speaker 3>in medicine, and that is definitely true for ECT because

0:18:34.810 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 3>there is not like one standard protocol that everyone is

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.620
<v Speaker 3>going to respond to or that everyone is going to get.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:40.860
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:18:40.900 --> 0:18:45.100
<v Speaker 2>So you also mentioned that the seizure that is induced

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.139
<v Speaker 2>can last up to 75 seconds, whatever. It's relatively short.

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:50.180
<v Speaker 3>Like a minute, 30 seconds to a minute.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.540
<v Speaker 2>Yep. What happens if it doesn't stop?

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:53.220
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:53.300 --> 0:18:55.420
<v Speaker 3>If it doesn't stop, then you give medications the same

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.180
<v Speaker 3>way you would with any other seizure that's lasting too

0:18:58.220 --> 0:19:01.670
<v Speaker 3>long to stop that seizure. And that does happen sometimes.

0:19:02.050 --> 0:19:04.950
<v Speaker 3>It also can happen where somebody maybe doesn't have a seizure.

0:19:05.070 --> 0:19:07.090
<v Speaker 3>And so then you might have to give a second

0:19:07.109 --> 0:19:10.210
<v Speaker 3>dose or decide if you're going to increase the amount

0:19:10.250 --> 0:19:12.109
<v Speaker 3>of electricity to try and induce a seizure or if

0:19:12.150 --> 0:19:15.139
<v Speaker 3>someone had what's considered an inadequate, so less than 25

0:19:15.140 --> 0:19:16.060
<v Speaker 3>seconds of a seizure.

0:19:17.190 --> 0:19:18.230
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Fascinating.

0:19:18.340 --> 0:19:21.300
<v Speaker 3>Okay. And then each, oh, can I, one thing that

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.260
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing you might ask, I said that this was this,

0:19:24.619 --> 0:19:27.540
<v Speaker 3>after that, you know, 60 seconds or so of the seizure,

0:19:27.740 --> 0:19:29.980
<v Speaker 3>that's it. The procedure is over, but that is not

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.820
<v Speaker 3>the end of ECT because ECT is generally something that

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 3>is done multiple times. So usually it starts about three

0:19:37.340 --> 0:19:40.060
<v Speaker 3>times a week and can last anywhere from like six

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 3>to 18 sessions or so. And for some people, it

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>might even be that they have continuation or maintenance therapy

0:19:46.060 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 3>where they kind of, taper it down so it's no

0:19:48.420 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>longer three days a week. Maybe it's twice a week,

0:19:51.020 --> 0:19:52.820
<v Speaker 3>and then once a week, maybe it's once a month.

0:19:53.500 --> 0:19:56.899
<v Speaker 3>But in general, it's quite rapid acting, especially compared to

0:19:56.980 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 3>so many other therapies that we have.

0:19:59.140 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 2>We usually see.

0:20:00.020 --> 0:20:03.109
<v Speaker 3>Substantial improvement in symptoms within the first few sessions. So

0:20:03.130 --> 0:20:04.410
<v Speaker 3>within the first couple of weeks.

0:20:05.740 --> 0:20:08.859
<v Speaker 2>OK, I mean, I guess I don't the next questions

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.070
<v Speaker 2>I have are is like how this works. What do

0:20:11.090 --> 0:20:12.950
<v Speaker 2>we use this for? Yeah.

0:20:13.050 --> 0:20:13.330
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:13.490 --> 0:20:13.710
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:20:14.210 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>OK, let's get into it.

0:20:16.190 --> 0:20:19.270
<v Speaker 3>Of course, the short answer to how does this work

0:20:19.330 --> 0:20:22.230
<v Speaker 3>is that we still don't really know. We don't really know.

0:20:22.590 --> 0:20:25.750
<v Speaker 3>And that's in part because we don't know the biological

0:20:25.790 --> 0:20:28.239
<v Speaker 3>mechanisms of so many of these disorders that we can

0:20:28.260 --> 0:20:29.380
<v Speaker 3>treat with ECT. Right.

0:20:29.700 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't mean we don't have hypotheses. Right.

0:20:31.890 --> 0:20:34.890
<v Speaker 3>There are a few main hypotheses as to how ECT

0:20:34.930 --> 0:20:37.850
<v Speaker 3>works in our brains. The first is that we see

0:20:37.970 --> 0:20:42.369
<v Speaker 3>substantial increases and changes in a bunch of our neurotransmitters.

0:20:42.670 --> 0:20:44.870
<v Speaker 3>These are friends that we know well from other episodes

0:20:44.890 --> 0:20:50.260
<v Speaker 3>like dopamine, serotonin, etc. We also see big changes in GABA,

0:20:50.540 --> 0:20:55.540
<v Speaker 3>which is an inhibitory neurotransmitter. And what's interesting about GABA

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.260
<v Speaker 3>is that we think, well, maybe this is just like

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 3>a neurotransmitter.

0:20:58.160 --> 0:20:59.300
<v Speaker 2>Effect, but also.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 3>GABA is involved in seizures because it's like an inhibitory neurotransmitter.

0:21:05.060 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 3>If GABA levels are low, then your seizure threshold is lower.

0:21:09.380 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 3>And we know that ECT actually raises the seizure threshold.

0:21:14.140 --> 0:21:18.170
<v Speaker 3>So during a course of ECT, seizures.

0:21:17.830 --> 0:21:18.850
<v Speaker 2>Tend to get shorter.

0:21:19.420 --> 0:21:22.179
<v Speaker 3>And sometimes we have to go up on that electricity

0:21:22.220 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 3>dose in order to have an actual seizure because our

0:21:25.820 --> 0:21:27.659
<v Speaker 3>threshold is rising with increasing treatments.

0:21:28.060 --> 0:21:29.060
<v Speaker 2>So there's some thought that.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:35.670
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's actually a GABA-related anticonvulsant effect that somehow is

0:21:35.750 --> 0:21:36.930
<v Speaker 3>how ECT is working.

0:21:37.230 --> 0:21:39.890
<v Speaker 2>Like it's like stimulating your brain to produce more GABA

0:21:39.990 --> 0:21:40.970
<v Speaker 2>and that's having other.

0:21:41.310 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 3>That's an anticonvulsive effect. And then why is that also

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 3>affecting all these other things? There's some involvement there that

0:21:47.619 --> 0:21:51.869
<v Speaker 3>we don't know. Okay. We also know that ECT has

0:21:52.170 --> 0:21:55.780
<v Speaker 3>induces really big fluctuations in a whole bunch of hormones

0:21:55.820 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 3>that our brain releases. So inside of our brain, there's

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.420
<v Speaker 3>these areas called the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland. We've

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.260
<v Speaker 3>talked about these in other episodes. And these produce hormones

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.180
<v Speaker 3>that go throughout our body and interact with a whole

0:22:09.220 --> 0:22:11.820
<v Speaker 3>bunch of other organs like our thyroid, our ovaries, our testes,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 3>our adrenal glands. And what we see after ECT is

0:22:14.780 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 3>increases in a lot of these hormones that are produced

0:22:17.530 --> 0:22:22.130
<v Speaker 3>by the hypothalamus and the pituitary, things like prolactin, ACTH,

0:22:22.190 --> 0:22:25.790
<v Speaker 3>which stimulates the release of cortisol. We also see increases

0:22:25.830 --> 0:22:28.810
<v Speaker 3>in TSH and just a bunch of changes that happen

0:22:28.850 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 3>in our hormones that How does this then directly cause

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 3>improvements in symptoms? We don't know, but we see these

0:22:35.220 --> 0:22:40.209
<v Speaker 3>changes from ECT. And finally, there's also evidence, and this

0:22:40.270 --> 0:22:45.230
<v Speaker 3>one is so interesting, Erin. ECT induces what's called neurogenesis,

0:22:45.450 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 3>which really means like structural brain changes in various parts,

0:22:50.300 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 3>in various different cell types. And this, we think, is

0:22:54.100 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 3>mostly mediated by this really interesting compound called BDNF or

0:22:58.580 --> 0:23:03.540
<v Speaker 3>brain-derived neurotrophic factor. And this actually induces neurogenesis. And so

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 3>we think maybe it's down to that. Maybe it's some

0:23:06.220 --> 0:23:08.530
<v Speaker 3>combination of all of these different things that are all

0:23:08.609 --> 0:23:10.950
<v Speaker 3>happening as a result of ECT. And we don't necessarily

0:23:10.990 --> 0:23:13.470
<v Speaker 3>have like a one-to-one mechanism of like, this is the

0:23:13.510 --> 0:23:15.950
<v Speaker 3>thing that helps with depression. This is the thing that

0:23:15.970 --> 0:23:18.970
<v Speaker 3>helps with suicidality. This is the thing, you know, we

0:23:19.010 --> 0:23:19.689
<v Speaker 3>don't necessarily know.

0:23:20.220 --> 0:23:23.860
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I feel like this wide range of effects

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 2>explains why it has helped in so many different things

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.590
<v Speaker 2>that we don't, I mean, I guess we don't necessarily

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.869
<v Speaker 2>know if there's the same physiological mechanism underpinning them all.

0:23:35.890 --> 0:23:36.050
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:37.310 --> 0:23:39.190
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And there probably isn't, right?

0:23:39.310 --> 0:23:39.590
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:23:39.730 --> 0:23:43.750
<v Speaker 3>The things that cause psychosis and schizophrenia are probably not

0:23:43.850 --> 0:23:47.780
<v Speaker 3>exactly the same things that are causing treatment-resistant depression, right?

0:23:47.859 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't make sense that those are the same exact thing,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 3>but we can treat both of them with something like ECT.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.260
<v Speaker 3>So it is really interesting.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.810
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting. It's really interesting.

0:23:57.369 --> 0:24:02.169
<v Speaker 3>And really, like we talked about last week, Erin, ECT works.

0:24:03.390 --> 0:24:08.270
<v Speaker 3>It is remarkably effective. One of the main indications for ACT,

0:24:08.350 --> 0:24:10.010
<v Speaker 3>one of the main reasons that we use it, especially

0:24:10.050 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 3>here in the States and in a lot of European

0:24:12.630 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 3>countries and Australia and New Zealand, is treatment-resistant depression. And

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.740
<v Speaker 3>that can be depression with or without psychosis and with

0:24:19.859 --> 0:24:23.870
<v Speaker 3>or without suicidal ideation. It can be unipolar or bipolar depression.

0:24:24.609 --> 0:24:27.210
<v Speaker 3>But most of the studies on remission and response rates

0:24:27.490 --> 0:24:27.709
<v Speaker 3>are wrong.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:28.970
<v Speaker 2>Remarkable.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:30.340
<v Speaker 3>We can see anywhere from like.

0:24:30.210 --> 0:24:31.899
<v Speaker 2>50 to 60 percent.

0:24:31.780 --> 0:24:36.900
<v Speaker 3>Or more remission, meaning you have essentially no depressive symptoms,

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.580
<v Speaker 3>like you have gone into quote-unquote remission. And response rates,

0:24:40.619 --> 0:24:43.540
<v Speaker 3>meaning improvement in your depressive symptoms, can be anywhere from

0:24:43.540 --> 0:24:47.699
<v Speaker 3>60 to 90 percent in some studies. And when we

0:24:47.740 --> 0:24:50.340
<v Speaker 3>compare this to SSRIs, which we talked about in a

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 3>prior episode, they have a remission rate at best of

0:24:54.140 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 3>around 40 percent, right?

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Wow, yeah. There's also data that ECT.

0:24:58.780 --> 0:25:01.860
<v Speaker 3>Can cut readmission rates in the first 30 days in half.

0:25:03.140 --> 0:25:04.180
<v Speaker 2>It's not perfect.

0:25:04.340 --> 0:25:07.939
<v Speaker 3>There is certainly still the risk of remission in the

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 3>first 6 to 12 months especially or the risk of

0:25:10.260 --> 0:25:15.210
<v Speaker 3>relapse essentially. And the recommendations on maintenance therapy are not

0:25:15.350 --> 0:25:17.690
<v Speaker 3>clear cut by any means. Yeah.

0:25:17.710 --> 0:25:17.790
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.510
<v Speaker 3>And of course, there are definite side effects to ECT.

0:25:22.790 --> 0:25:23.070
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:25:23.609 --> 0:25:23.850
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:25:24.510 --> 0:25:25.570
<v Speaker 2>There are minor.

0:25:25.290 --> 0:25:29.090
<v Speaker 3>Side effects that often don't even get mentioned because they're

0:25:29.230 --> 0:25:32.170
<v Speaker 3>considered so minor. But these might be things like headache

0:25:32.450 --> 0:25:36.590
<v Speaker 3>or muscle aches, especially actually from the succinylcholine because it

0:25:36.650 --> 0:25:39.090
<v Speaker 3>causes those twitchings at first. So you might actually get

0:25:39.109 --> 0:25:42.490
<v Speaker 3>muscle aches from that, which is so interesting. Nausea, which

0:25:42.540 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 3>is usually from the general anesthetic more than anything. These

0:25:46.060 --> 0:25:49.899
<v Speaker 3>are all typically very easily controlled with things like antiemetics

0:25:50.060 --> 0:25:53.660
<v Speaker 3>and like acetaminophen, over-the-counter medications. And that's why I think

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.619
<v Speaker 3>no one really talks about those, but those are definitely

0:25:55.660 --> 0:25:59.660
<v Speaker 3>post-procedural side effects. But it's the cognitive effects and specifically

0:25:59.700 --> 0:26:02.700
<v Speaker 3>the memory effects that are the main complication of ECT.

0:26:03.100 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 3>And these can happen actually on a few different timescales.

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Immediately after the procedure, people are going to be a

0:26:10.060 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 3>little bit confused. That's from the seizure itself, and that's

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.090
<v Speaker 3>also from coming out of anesthesia. But this is something

0:26:17.130 --> 0:26:19.550
<v Speaker 3>that usually only lasts a few minutes, maybe like 30

0:26:19.550 --> 0:26:21.610
<v Speaker 3>minutes or so. Some people might have a harder time

0:26:21.690 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 3>coming out of anesthesia. They might even get a little

0:26:23.890 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>bit agitated, but this is pretty rare. And it's usually

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.700
<v Speaker 3>just the first 30 minutes where people are quite confused

0:26:29.740 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 3>about what just happened. The first couple of weeks, Some

0:26:33.940 --> 0:26:37.940
<v Speaker 3>people might have problems with attention or things like executive functioning,

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 3>like being able to do the kind of high-level tasks

0:26:40.340 --> 0:26:41.700
<v Speaker 3>that you might have to do to, say, run a

0:26:41.740 --> 0:26:45.770
<v Speaker 3>household or something like that. But what's really interesting is

0:26:45.790 --> 0:26:50.169
<v Speaker 3>that most of the data on most aspects of cognitive

0:26:50.250 --> 0:26:54.369
<v Speaker 3>function are that they actually improve after ECT.

0:26:55.350 --> 0:26:56.290
<v Speaker 2>In the long term.

0:26:56.430 --> 0:26:59.219
<v Speaker 3>In the long term, exactly. Okay. And we don't know

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.620
<v Speaker 3>why that is, except that maybe it's because we've improved

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:04.140
<v Speaker 3>the depressive.

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Symptoms especially, right?

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.260
<v Speaker 3>And that depression has a huge impact on cognitive functioning.

0:27:09.420 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 3>But memory is a different story.

0:27:11.820 --> 0:27:13.220
<v Speaker 2>Memory is a different story, yes.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.570
<v Speaker 3>And there's two types of memory loss that can happen

0:27:15.609 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 3>with ECT. There's something called anterograde amnesia. And that's difficulty

0:27:21.109 --> 0:27:25.190
<v Speaker 3>retaining new information after the procedure. So like you do

0:27:25.230 --> 0:27:27.090
<v Speaker 3>the procedure, you go home and you're like, I don't

0:27:27.130 --> 0:27:29.629
<v Speaker 3>know where I put my keys today. I can't remember

0:27:29.670 --> 0:27:32.050
<v Speaker 3>what's on the schedule for today. What did you tell

0:27:32.070 --> 0:27:34.670
<v Speaker 3>me this morning? Did we have a conversation? Those kinds

0:27:34.710 --> 0:27:35.010
<v Speaker 3>of things.

0:27:35.090 --> 0:27:36.010
<v Speaker 2>Forming memories.

0:27:36.310 --> 0:27:39.909
<v Speaker 3>Forming new memories. And this can actually get worse over

0:27:39.950 --> 0:27:42.290
<v Speaker 3>the course of ECT since this is going to be,

0:27:42.350 --> 0:27:45.170
<v Speaker 3>you know, anywhere from six to 18 or more sessions.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.139
<v Speaker 3>And that is why often during ECT therapy, even if

0:27:49.180 --> 0:27:51.659
<v Speaker 3>people are going home in between each session and are

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.090
<v Speaker 3>not hospitalized, they might have restrictions on things like driving.

0:27:55.550 --> 0:27:58.689
<v Speaker 3>They might be advised not to make big life decisions.

0:27:58.750 --> 0:28:01.260
<v Speaker 3>They probably aren't able to work and things like that.

0:28:02.220 --> 0:28:06.179
<v Speaker 3>But this type of anterograde amnesia, the difficulty forming new memories,

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 3>it almost always resolves within a few weeks of completing

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:10.350
<v Speaker 3>the course of therapy.

0:28:10.660 --> 0:28:10.940
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:28:11.350 --> 0:28:13.830
<v Speaker 3>So people are usually able to start forming new memories

0:28:13.910 --> 0:28:17.790
<v Speaker 3>again after they have finished a course of ECT. The

0:28:17.830 --> 0:28:22.090
<v Speaker 3>bigger concern for most people is retrograde amnesia. This is

0:28:22.150 --> 0:28:25.070
<v Speaker 3>the loss of memories of things that happened before the

0:28:25.130 --> 0:28:29.910
<v Speaker 3>ECT procedure. It's usually cited as more recent events. So

0:28:30.070 --> 0:28:32.310
<v Speaker 3>like the last few weeks or months tend to be

0:28:32.330 --> 0:28:34.909
<v Speaker 3>the most affected. Do you remember, Erin, because I know

0:28:34.930 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 3>you just watched Mad Men recently, but there was Peter

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Campbell was having an affair with Alexis Bledel.

0:28:42.340 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>From Gilmore Girls. From Gilmore Girls.

0:28:44.340 --> 0:28:45.979
<v Speaker 3>Yes. And she like went to him and she's like,

0:28:46.020 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to talk to you because I'm not

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.170
<v Speaker 3>going to remember who you are after this because I'm

0:28:50.210 --> 0:28:51.370
<v Speaker 3>going to go in and have ECT.

0:28:51.390 --> 0:28:51.630
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 3>And I thought that was so interesting. And then sure enough,

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.910
<v Speaker 3>she didn't remember him after he went in and she

0:28:55.930 --> 0:28:58.210
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, who are you? Thanks for coming to visit.

0:28:58.290 --> 0:28:59.650
<v Speaker 3>And she was much better.

0:28:59.670 --> 0:29:01.390
<v Speaker 2>I remember that now.

0:29:01.470 --> 0:29:02.270
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:29:02.550 --> 0:29:05.050
<v Speaker 3>And so that's not uncommon that you might have a loss.

0:29:05.130 --> 0:29:07.330
<v Speaker 3>It's usually not a complete loss of like all of

0:29:07.370 --> 0:29:09.770
<v Speaker 3>your memory, but there can be kind of spotty memory loss.

0:29:10.790 --> 0:29:12.990
<v Speaker 3>Usually we say the first few weeks or months, but

0:29:13.090 --> 0:29:18.470
<v Speaker 3>it can go back years. And while for most people...

0:29:18.870 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 3>these memories will come back or this memory loss will

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:23.140
<v Speaker 3>resolve over time.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:24.580
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't always.

0:29:25.060 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>And for some people, this memory loss can be permanent.

0:29:29.740 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 3>It's much more common with bilateral treatment rather than unilateral treatment.

0:29:34.010 --> 0:29:36.550
<v Speaker 3>And what's really interesting, especially when you read through some

0:29:36.570 --> 0:29:38.990
<v Speaker 3>of the papers, people have a lot of really strong

0:29:39.050 --> 0:29:42.060
<v Speaker 3>opinions about ECT. I know that you encountered this as well, Erin.

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:29:43.460 --> 0:29:44.900
<v Speaker 3>And you can tell as soon as you start reading

0:29:44.940 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>a paper if this is someone who's like super pro-ECT

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 3>or actually anti-ECT. And I read a paper by someone,

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.860
<v Speaker 3>it was actually a commentary, but it wasn't a peer-reviewed journal,

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.060
<v Speaker 3>but it was by someone who has done ECT research

0:29:58.100 --> 0:30:03.070
<v Speaker 3>for decades, right? So he's very pro-ECT, but he was

0:30:03.310 --> 0:30:07.810
<v Speaker 3>railing against people who were trying to claim that we

0:30:07.990 --> 0:30:10.890
<v Speaker 3>don't have good data, that this permanent memory loss is

0:30:10.950 --> 0:30:11.510
<v Speaker 3>a real thing.

0:30:11.950 --> 0:30:13.630
<v Speaker 2>I think I came across that commentary.

0:30:13.870 --> 0:30:16.390
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a really interesting commentary because I think

0:30:16.430 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 3>that what's so important about this conversation is when it

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 3>comes to memory loss is that this kind of memory loss,

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 3>even if.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:25.740
<v Speaker 2>It's not like your.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Whole life is being erased, right? It's usually spotty memories,

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.940
<v Speaker 3>but it can be memories of times or places or

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.860
<v Speaker 3>events that were really personally important to you. You might

0:30:34.900 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 3>not remember your wedding. You might not remember specific events

0:30:38.530 --> 0:30:41.570
<v Speaker 3>that happened or vacations that you took, things that you

0:30:41.710 --> 0:30:45.390
<v Speaker 3>used to remember. And that may or may not be

0:30:45.550 --> 0:30:46.810
<v Speaker 3>really distressing to you.

0:30:46.830 --> 0:30:47.370
<v Speaker 1>Mm-hmm.

0:30:47.700 --> 0:30:49.340
<v Speaker 3>And we don't know for sure if it's going to

0:30:49.380 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 3>happen or if it's going to come back.

0:30:51.300 --> 0:30:54.020
<v Speaker 2>I think that's sort of what is, you know, when

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.620
<v Speaker 2>you were talking about the procedure and you were talking

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:02.670
<v Speaker 2>about unilateral versus bilateral application and, you know, language on

0:31:02.690 --> 0:31:06.750
<v Speaker 2>this side versus that, is that we don't fully understand

0:31:07.150 --> 0:31:10.850
<v Speaker 2>why it causes memory loss. And we don't fully understand...

0:31:11.180 --> 0:31:13.500
<v Speaker 2>why it happens to some people and not others to

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.690
<v Speaker 2>then sort of say, well, what's the risk of this

0:31:16.730 --> 0:31:19.850
<v Speaker 2>happening to you? And I was wondering, do you have

0:31:19.990 --> 0:31:22.710
<v Speaker 2>numbers for this? That's a good question.

0:31:22.930 --> 0:31:25.050
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see great numbers on like how many people

0:31:25.090 --> 0:31:29.230
<v Speaker 3>do we expect to have permanent versus temporary memory loss?

0:31:29.310 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Most of them just say that most people, it's going

0:31:31.620 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 3>to come back. How much is most?

0:31:33.420 --> 0:31:36.620
<v Speaker 2>Right, right. And I think it's, I mean, it's all

0:31:36.660 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>part of the cost benefit weighing those and saying like,

0:31:41.110 --> 0:31:43.490
<v Speaker 2>If you can't function or if you feel like there's

0:31:43.550 --> 0:31:46.630
<v Speaker 2>no hope left and it seems like pretty likely that

0:31:46.990 --> 0:31:49.950
<v Speaker 2>most people will experience some benefit. It's not guaranteed.

0:31:49.970 --> 0:31:50.450
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:31:50.690 --> 0:31:53.790
<v Speaker 2>But we don't know. It's like much harder to articulate.

0:31:53.930 --> 0:31:54.130
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:31:54.190 --> 0:31:57.070
<v Speaker 3>To like put exact numbers on the chances that you're

0:31:57.090 --> 0:31:59.510
<v Speaker 3>going to have worse side effects, really.

0:31:59.530 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:00.490 --> 0:32:02.540
<v Speaker 3>And it is one of those situations where we have to,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:04.540
<v Speaker 3>like we said in last episode, hold a lot of

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 3>truths that are conflicting all at once.

0:32:06.580 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:32:06.700 --> 0:32:09.970
<v Speaker 3>Right. ECT is one of the most effective treatments that

0:32:10.010 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 3>we have for severe affective disorders, among other things. And

0:32:15.300 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 3>we've come so far in how this procedure is done,

0:32:19.380 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 3>how we do informed consent for it, the safety of

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.570
<v Speaker 3>this procedure. It's incredibly safe. And it has the potential

0:32:26.590 --> 0:32:29.530
<v Speaker 3>for substantial side effects. Yeah. All of that is true

0:32:29.610 --> 0:32:30.410
<v Speaker 3>all at the same time.

0:32:30.470 --> 0:32:31.490
<v Speaker 2>All of these things are true.

0:32:31.790 --> 0:32:31.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:32:32.570 --> 0:32:53.210
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. We also don't use it as much as we could.

0:32:53.230 --> 0:32:54.350
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:32:55.190 --> 0:32:59.470
<v Speaker 3>For a lot of reasons. Cost, especially in the U.S. Access,

0:32:59.770 --> 0:33:02.850
<v Speaker 3>especially in the U.S. You're much more likely to get

0:33:02.990 --> 0:33:06.490
<v Speaker 3>access to ECT as an option if you have private

0:33:06.530 --> 0:33:09.610
<v Speaker 3>insurance or Medicare than if you're on Medicaid or Medi-Cal.

0:33:10.090 --> 0:33:13.910
<v Speaker 2>Which is just all medical things in general. It's so

0:33:13.930 --> 0:33:14.370
<v Speaker 2>many things.

0:33:14.470 --> 0:33:14.670
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.010
<v Speaker 3>We don't have really great numbers on like how many

0:33:18.050 --> 0:33:20.690
<v Speaker 3>people really get ECT worldwide every year. But in a

0:33:20.710 --> 0:33:23.670
<v Speaker 3>lot of papers, it'll be like maybe one, one and

0:33:23.690 --> 0:33:27.890
<v Speaker 3>a half, two percent of people with severe depression who

0:33:27.970 --> 0:33:31.990
<v Speaker 3>actually got ECT, which I think is really interesting. Yeah.

0:33:32.110 --> 0:33:36.750
<v Speaker 3>So it's pretty low percentage wise. It's interesting because you mentioned, Erin,

0:33:36.830 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 3>that in it was the 1950s that it became standard

0:33:40.980 --> 0:33:45.450
<v Speaker 3>to do ECT under anesthesia and with muscle relaxants. But

0:33:45.470 --> 0:33:48.260
<v Speaker 3>there was a paper from 2012 that noted that in

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.740
<v Speaker 3>some parts of the world, ECT is still done what's

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.940
<v Speaker 3>called unmodified. So without anesthesia and without muscle relaxers, which

0:33:55.980 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I think is really wild because those are totally available.

0:33:59.340 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:00.540 --> 0:34:03.590
<v Speaker 3>It probably comes down to the lack of availability of anesthesiology.

0:34:04.770 --> 0:34:05.190
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:34:05.230 --> 0:34:06.550
<v Speaker 3>Is what it probably comes down to. Okay.

0:34:06.570 --> 0:34:06.870
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:34:08.190 --> 0:34:09.420
<v Speaker 2>And we also use it.

0:34:09.469 --> 0:34:12.989
<v Speaker 3>I've talked a lot about severe or treatment-resistant depression, but

0:34:13.010 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 3>we use ECT for a lot of other things as well.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.940
<v Speaker 3>In bipolar disorder, it's most often used for a depressive episode,

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.820
<v Speaker 3>but it can also sometimes be used for manic episodes

0:34:22.860 --> 0:34:27.060
<v Speaker 3>as well, but less commonly. And it started out, like

0:34:27.100 --> 0:34:31.070
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, as a treatment for schizophrenia. Yeah. Globally, this

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.969
<v Speaker 3>is probably still the number one indication that ECT is

0:34:34.070 --> 0:34:36.850
<v Speaker 3>used for. But in the U.S., it's much less common

0:34:36.870 --> 0:34:39.670
<v Speaker 3>to use it for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder than it

0:34:39.750 --> 0:34:41.410
<v Speaker 3>is for depressive disorders.

0:34:42.910 --> 0:34:43.859
<v Speaker 2>Interesting.

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Except for something called catatonia. Yeah. So I want to

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 3>take a second to talk about catatonia. We should do

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:52.620
<v Speaker 3>an episode on catatonia, Erin.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.610
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. We should. There's a lot there. There's a lot.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 3>But briefly, catatonia is considered a psychomotor condition, meaning there's

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.940
<v Speaker 3>psychological symptoms and then there's actually these motor symptoms that

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.420
<v Speaker 3>we see. It used to be considered just a subset

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.410
<v Speaker 3>of schizophrenia, but it is not by any means a

0:35:09.450 --> 0:35:10.549
<v Speaker 3>subset of schizophrenia.

0:35:10.670 --> 0:35:11.650
<v Speaker 2>It can happen in.

0:35:11.610 --> 0:35:16.950
<v Speaker 3>A pretty wide variety of psychological and neurological conditions. But

0:35:16.969 --> 0:35:21.710
<v Speaker 3>what we see in catatonia is this profound unresponsiveness where

0:35:21.750 --> 0:35:25.089
<v Speaker 3>people are awake, their eyes are open, but they are

0:35:25.210 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 3>not responsive to the world around them. They're often, they

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.820
<v Speaker 3>don't talk at all. So they have what's considered mutism.

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.060
<v Speaker 3>Or sometimes they'll have something called echolalia, which is this

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 3>like repetitive vocalizations, either repeating specific words or maybe repeating

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:40.300
<v Speaker 3>a word that you said.

0:35:41.340 --> 0:35:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Their body is very rigid.

0:35:43.620 --> 0:35:47.969
<v Speaker 3>There's something called catalepsy. which is where, and also this

0:35:48.010 --> 0:35:51.129
<v Speaker 3>thing they call waxy flexibility, where you, like, let's say

0:35:51.150 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 3>that I moved someone's arm into this upright position and

0:35:55.300 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 3>then I took my hand away, it would just stay there.

0:35:58.940 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 3>They wouldn't move back down. And so people are very,

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:06.540
<v Speaker 3>very immobile in this kind of rigid state. And because

0:36:06.620 --> 0:36:10.180
<v Speaker 3>of how immobile and because of how unresponsive people are

0:36:10.260 --> 0:36:14.530
<v Speaker 3>in catatonia, this is a pretty life-threatening condition. People generally

0:36:14.550 --> 0:36:18.540
<v Speaker 3>cannot eat. They're going to have substantial weight loss and malnutrition.

0:36:19.100 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 3>They're not moving, so they're at risk of developing things

0:36:21.780 --> 0:36:24.420
<v Speaker 3>like pressure ulcers, which of course can get infected and

0:36:24.460 --> 0:36:27.580
<v Speaker 3>cause major problems. And depending on what position they're in

0:36:27.620 --> 0:36:29.549
<v Speaker 3>and how rigid they are, they also can start to

0:36:29.590 --> 0:36:32.770
<v Speaker 3>have like muscle breakdown and things, right? You imagine that

0:36:32.810 --> 0:36:35.390
<v Speaker 3>your muscle is in this contracted position for a really

0:36:35.430 --> 0:36:37.610
<v Speaker 3>long time. You can end up with contractures in the

0:36:37.630 --> 0:36:42.290
<v Speaker 3>long term. Catatonia from any cause can have a mortality

0:36:42.350 --> 0:36:44.510
<v Speaker 3>rate of up to 20% if it's untreated.

0:36:44.790 --> 0:36:45.110
<v Speaker 1>Whoa.

0:36:46.340 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 3>And there's also a kind of subset of catatonia called

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:54.180
<v Speaker 3>malignant catatonia and another condition that's life-threatening called NMS or

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:58.620
<v Speaker 3>neuroleptic malignant syndrome. That is very similar to catatonia, but

0:36:58.700 --> 0:37:03.010
<v Speaker 3>caused by antipsychotic medications or other drugs. And so similarly,

0:37:03.050 --> 0:37:06.390
<v Speaker 3>you have this rigidity, you have this unresponsiveness, but you

0:37:06.530 --> 0:37:11.009
<v Speaker 3>also see fever, tremors, muscle cramps, and it's usually a

0:37:11.030 --> 0:37:15.220
<v Speaker 3>pretty sudden onset. So malignant catatonia, as well as NMS

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:20.420
<v Speaker 3>and catatonia, regardless of the cause, is another reason that

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 3>we might use ECT. And it's incredibly effective for catatonia.

0:37:25.300 --> 0:37:26.259
<v Speaker 1>Hmm. Yep.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 2>How effective?

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't have a number on that.

0:37:32.690 --> 0:37:37.010
<v Speaker 2>And again, we don't fully know why. No, we don't

0:37:37.050 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 2>fully know.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:42.020
<v Speaker 3>And it's usually not like first-line therapy for catatonia. It's usually,

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.780
<v Speaker 3>if we've tried other things, usually benzodiazepines are a first-line therapy.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.900
<v Speaker 3>So that's what we would use to like, which interesting

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.609
<v Speaker 3>is we use it to stop a seizure. But there's

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.969
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things that can cause catatonia. One of

0:37:55.010 --> 0:37:59.069
<v Speaker 3>the things that can cause catatonia quite frequently is NMDA

0:37:59.310 --> 0:38:00.589
<v Speaker 3>receptor encephalitis.

0:38:00.610 --> 0:38:00.690
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:38:01.810 --> 0:38:03.290
<v Speaker 3>Many of you might think that you've never heard of

0:38:03.310 --> 0:38:05.070
<v Speaker 3>that because it sounds like a fancy medical word. But

0:38:05.270 --> 0:38:07.230
<v Speaker 3>if you've ever read the book or watched the movie

0:38:07.290 --> 0:38:07.950
<v Speaker 3>Brain on Fire.

0:38:07.969 --> 0:38:08.890
<v Speaker 2>It's great.

0:38:09.469 --> 0:38:14.030
<v Speaker 3>That is an example of NMDA receptor encephalitis. And that

0:38:14.310 --> 0:38:17.590
<v Speaker 3>like 30% of cases can end up with catatonia. And

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:22.259
<v Speaker 3>while it's first line treated with immunotherapy, in some cases,

0:38:22.500 --> 0:38:26.940
<v Speaker 3>ECT has been used effectively to treat catatonia in those

0:38:26.980 --> 0:38:29.379
<v Speaker 3>cases as well. So kind of just like really bolsters that.

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.739
<v Speaker 3>the use of ECT in all forms of catatonia, which

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:34.580
<v Speaker 3>is really interesting.

0:38:34.980 --> 0:38:37.500
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this is a bigger question, but ECT never seems

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:43.430
<v Speaker 2>like a standalone therapy for one condition. It's usually used

0:38:43.610 --> 0:38:45.170
<v Speaker 2>along with a suite of other therapies.

0:38:45.190 --> 0:38:46.350
<v Speaker 3>In combination.

0:38:46.630 --> 0:38:50.450
<v Speaker 2>But are there situations where it is not last resort?

0:38:52.660 --> 0:38:56.910
<v Speaker 3>If it's an emergency... Okay. So something like a catatonia

0:38:57.150 --> 0:38:59.850
<v Speaker 3>or a neuroleptic malignant syndrome, I mean, honestly, even then

0:38:59.870 --> 0:39:01.810
<v Speaker 3>you're going to start with other therapies first. But if

0:39:01.830 --> 0:39:05.790
<v Speaker 3>they're not improving, if someone has really severe treatment-resistant depression

0:39:06.170 --> 0:39:07.590
<v Speaker 3>and they come in and they've had a lot of

0:39:07.650 --> 0:39:12.860
<v Speaker 3>weight loss, they're not eating, they're really severely suicidal or

0:39:12.890 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 3>something like that, then it might be... But it's kind

0:39:15.780 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 3>of hard to say that that's really first line, right?

0:39:17.660 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Because those... Treatment-resistant.

0:39:19.860 --> 0:39:20.260
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

0:39:20.300 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 3>They've already gone through so much to get to that point.

0:39:22.660 --> 0:39:22.819
<v Speaker 1>But.

0:39:23.660 --> 0:39:27.739
<v Speaker 3>In 2001, the American Psychiatric Association, I'm going to get

0:39:28.370 --> 0:39:30.969
<v Speaker 3>that acronym wrong, but they... basically came out and they

0:39:30.989 --> 0:39:34.020
<v Speaker 3>were like, ECT should not be last line therapy. ECT

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 3>should not be the thing that we think of when

0:39:36.100 --> 0:39:39.100
<v Speaker 3>everything else has tried and failed so many times. And

0:39:39.180 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 3>yet still, that's what it often is, which is unfortunate.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:42.660
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.850
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it's where like, timeline, the timeline,

0:39:46.890 --> 0:39:50.970
<v Speaker 2>the urgency, the severity all are kind of weighed within this.

0:39:51.310 --> 0:39:55.230
<v Speaker 2>Catatonia is interesting because the person is non-responsive and so,

0:39:55.270 --> 0:39:58.970
<v Speaker 2>but there's still an informed consent process. Can you tell

0:39:59.010 --> 0:40:00.259
<v Speaker 2>me what that's like?

0:40:00.510 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's, it is an interesting, for all of the

0:40:06.620 --> 0:40:08.860
<v Speaker 3>cases that we're going to use ECT, I think that

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:12.100
<v Speaker 3>the informed consent process is a really interesting and incredibly

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.850
<v Speaker 3>important part of that process. Because even if someone is

0:40:15.969 --> 0:40:18.089
<v Speaker 3>not so severe that they have catatonia where they're not

0:40:18.130 --> 0:40:21.390
<v Speaker 3>responding at all, but even if they have really severe depression,

0:40:22.430 --> 0:40:28.170
<v Speaker 3>their sickness, their illness is causing them to not care

0:40:28.450 --> 0:40:30.950
<v Speaker 3>in many cases about getting better, right?

0:40:30.969 --> 0:40:31.489
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:40:31.790 --> 0:40:34.250
<v Speaker 3>And not always, that's not, it's a generalization, but that

0:40:34.310 --> 0:40:36.509
<v Speaker 3>like that is part of the nature of so many

0:40:36.610 --> 0:40:40.029
<v Speaker 3>of these disorders. So the informed consent process is quite

0:40:40.070 --> 0:40:43.180
<v Speaker 3>long and detailed. If someone is not able to make

0:40:43.219 --> 0:40:45.900
<v Speaker 3>decisions for themselves, and this is actually true for all procedures,

0:40:45.980 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 3>not just ECT, but then we have what's called a

0:40:48.739 --> 0:40:51.259
<v Speaker 3>surrogate decision maker. And so you have to identify who

0:40:51.300 --> 0:40:54.260
<v Speaker 3>that person is. Is it their spouse? Is it their parent?

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.420
<v Speaker 3>Is it someone that they have designated as their healthcare

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:59.180
<v Speaker 3>power of attorney, which is so important that everyone has

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:01.020
<v Speaker 3>a healthcare power of attorney to make your decisions if

0:41:01.060 --> 0:41:04.550
<v Speaker 3>you can't make decisions for yourself? But that's really extra important.

0:41:04.710 --> 0:41:08.210
<v Speaker 3>And family and or friends or whoever those people are,

0:41:08.350 --> 0:41:13.150
<v Speaker 3>are usually always involved in the ECT process, even if someone,

0:41:13.330 --> 0:41:16.270
<v Speaker 3>you know, is able to respond. It's usually recommended that

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of everyone is on board with this. But

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.339
<v Speaker 3>of course, in the case of catatonia or when someone

0:41:21.380 --> 0:41:23.460
<v Speaker 3>is unresponsive, then yes, it's someone else who is going

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:26.700
<v Speaker 3>to be going through that informed consent process for them. Okay.

0:41:27.219 --> 0:41:27.500
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:41:27.700 --> 0:41:32.299
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So yeah, Erin, that is what we know. about

0:41:32.380 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 3>ECT and how it works. And I ended with talking

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 3>about ECT in catatonia and NMDA receptor encephalitis because now

0:41:40.900 --> 0:41:45.650
<v Speaker 3>we get to pause and be joined by Dr. Leonardo Lopez,

0:41:45.850 --> 0:41:50.069
<v Speaker 3>who is an expert in ECT, including in the use

0:41:50.150 --> 0:41:55.110
<v Speaker 3>of ECT for catatonia, including in cases of NMDA receptor encephalitis.

0:41:55.190 --> 0:41:57.549
<v Speaker 3>And I am really excited to be joined by him.

0:41:58.290 --> 0:41:59.700
<v Speaker 2>So let's go. Let's go.

0:42:29.460 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Dr.

0:42:29.739 --> 0:42:32.390
<v Speaker 2>Lopez, thank you so much for joining us today. We're

0:42:32.430 --> 0:42:33.070
<v Speaker 2>really excited.

0:42:33.090 --> 0:42:33.739
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure.

0:42:33.950 --> 0:42:36.660
<v Speaker 2>Could you give us a sense of how you use

0:42:36.780 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 2>ECT in your practice, some of the diverse applications that

0:42:40.380 --> 0:42:41.500
<v Speaker 2>you use ECT for?

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:47.140
<v Speaker 1>Sure, absolutely. So we use ECT for a variety of illnesses,

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>largely illnesses that have traditionally been considered psychiatric, although there

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.790
<v Speaker 1>are other conditions that are sort of in a more

0:42:56.050 --> 0:42:59.350
<v Speaker 1>liminal space that we also use ECT for. The most

0:42:59.390 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>common indication is for treatment-resistant depression, patients who have depression

0:43:02.860 --> 0:43:08.350
<v Speaker 1>and have received medication for depression therapy and have not

0:43:08.410 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>responded and remain ill. And then there are a variety

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.180
<v Speaker 1>of others. So we use it for bipolar disorder, both

0:43:15.300 --> 0:43:19.270
<v Speaker 1>in the depressed phase and the manic phase. We use

0:43:19.330 --> 0:43:22.669
<v Speaker 1>it for what's called psychotic depression, which is a form

0:43:22.690 --> 0:43:27.430
<v Speaker 1>of depression where patients also have delusions and or hallucinations.

0:43:28.290 --> 0:43:31.810
<v Speaker 1>We use it in schizophrenia, particularly in patients who have

0:43:31.890 --> 0:43:36.219
<v Speaker 1>not responded to treatment with antipsychotics or who cannot tolerate them.

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Then we use it in catatonia, which is a neuropsychiatric

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:46.689
<v Speaker 1>condition characterized by changes in speech and motor behavior that

0:43:46.790 --> 0:43:49.730
<v Speaker 1>sort of spans a number of diagnoses. So it can

0:43:49.930 --> 0:43:54.580
<v Speaker 1>occur with schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, but can also occur

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:59.630
<v Speaker 1>with in a variety of medical illnesses, including autoimmune diseases

0:43:59.730 --> 0:44:05.450
<v Speaker 1>like lupus, autoimmune encephalitis, and a variety of other neuropsychiatric conditions.

0:44:05.910 --> 0:44:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Those are the most common indications. There are other things

0:44:07.980 --> 0:44:10.779
<v Speaker 1>that we do use it for outside of the psychiatric realm.

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:15.140
<v Speaker 1>For example, it can be used to treat super refractory

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>status epilepticus when patients are seizing continuously and are on

0:44:20.219 --> 0:44:22.770
<v Speaker 1>high doses of antiepileptic drugs, and yet their seizures have

0:44:22.810 --> 0:44:27.190
<v Speaker 1>not been brought under control. But its most common usage

0:44:27.390 --> 0:44:30.450
<v Speaker 1>is in what's now considered the psychiatric realm.

0:44:31.530 --> 0:44:35.270
<v Speaker 3>How much at the hospitals or hospital that you work

0:44:35.290 --> 0:44:38.790
<v Speaker 3>in patient volumes are you seeing? Is it sort of

0:44:38.989 --> 0:44:41.739
<v Speaker 3>an everyday practice for you or kind of how common

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 3>is it that you're using ECT?

0:44:44.660 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very common where we work. It's an everyday practice

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:52.510
<v Speaker 1>for us. We are scheduled three days a week, although

0:44:52.530 --> 0:44:56.370
<v Speaker 1>I oversee services at two different hospitals, and the days

0:44:56.410 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are different, so it ends up being a five-day-a-week practice.

0:45:00.390 --> 0:45:04.380
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that the average patient will receive

0:45:04.380 --> 0:45:09.060
<v Speaker 1>10 to 12 treatments, some more, some fewer. And a

0:45:09.140 --> 0:45:15.730
<v Speaker 1>given year, we perform... in excess of 6,000 treatments between

0:45:15.750 --> 0:45:20.810
<v Speaker 1>the two hospitals that I oversee. So quite frequent. On

0:45:20.850 --> 0:45:25.330
<v Speaker 1>a given day, we might treat anywhere between 25 and

0:45:25.330 --> 0:45:29.510
<v Speaker 1>30 patients at one campus, depending. That includes both patients

0:45:29.530 --> 0:45:33.750
<v Speaker 1>who are hospitalized for psychiatric reasons and patients who are

0:45:33.790 --> 0:45:38.779
<v Speaker 1>coming in from home and receiving either maintenance treatment, meaning

0:45:38.890 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 1>they've responded to the treatment previously and they're receiving it

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to prevent relapse, or they're ill but not enough to

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.180
<v Speaker 1>be in the hospital, and so they're brought in from

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:51.549
<v Speaker 1>home for treatment there. also occasionally includes patients who are

0:45:51.630 --> 0:45:55.230
<v Speaker 1>hospitalized on medical floors rather than psychiatric floors in the hospital,

0:45:55.290 --> 0:45:59.109
<v Speaker 1>and occasionally patients who are in the intensive care unit.

0:46:00.110 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>In the firsthand account that you shared of that young

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:07.260
<v Speaker 2>child with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, I mean, there was clearly

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:11.100
<v Speaker 2>such a profound impact. And throughout the episodes, we have

0:46:11.140 --> 0:46:14.980
<v Speaker 2>discussed how effective ECT has been and shown to be

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:19.210
<v Speaker 2>in treating a multitude of conditions, And yet there is

0:46:19.290 --> 0:46:22.850
<v Speaker 2>so much resistance. Of course, there's like from the general

0:46:22.890 --> 0:46:25.689
<v Speaker 2>public side of things, the fear and the stigma and misinformation.

0:46:26.190 --> 0:46:29.950
<v Speaker 2>But even among medical fields, there seems to be kind

0:46:29.969 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 2>of a divide or a reluctance. How do you think

0:46:33.300 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 2>the perception of ECT across different fields of medicine contributes

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:39.460
<v Speaker 2>to its underutilization?

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:44.140
<v Speaker 1>Mm-hmm. I think that insofar as there's reluctance in other

0:46:44.180 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>medical fields to think about or use ECT, which I

0:46:46.700 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>think there is, it largely stems from a lack of exposure.

0:46:51.570 --> 0:46:54.830
<v Speaker 1>If people have not seen patients treated with ECT, both

0:46:54.850 --> 0:46:58.410
<v Speaker 1>just witnessed the procedure with their own eyes and seen

0:46:58.450 --> 0:47:02.509
<v Speaker 1>the progression of the patient when they're treated. Then the

0:47:02.550 --> 0:47:04.469
<v Speaker 1>only exposure they have to it is, you know, in

0:47:04.510 --> 0:47:09.089
<v Speaker 1>a textbook in medical school or the many, many depictions

0:47:10.010 --> 0:47:12.630
<v Speaker 1>that they see in the media and all their medical professionals.

0:47:12.650 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>And they know those those depictions are often inaccurate. Still,

0:47:16.820 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they leave a mark, right? They leave an impression.

0:47:19.980 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I think what we.

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Find is that when we have a colleague in another

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:30.420
<v Speaker 1>discipline with whom we're collaborating and treating their patient, and

0:47:30.700 --> 0:47:34.980
<v Speaker 1>they see the procedure and see how unremarkable, it appears,

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and also see the development, then they become converted, if

0:47:41.660 --> 0:47:44.190
<v Speaker 1>you will, to the utility of the treatment very quickly.

0:47:44.210 --> 0:47:47.410
<v Speaker 1>So most of this is about exposure, I think. The

0:47:47.469 --> 0:47:52.410
<v Speaker 1>more that we're able to show our colleagues in other

0:47:52.469 --> 0:47:56.210
<v Speaker 1>fields the value of this treatment, the more they support it.

0:47:56.230 --> 0:47:58.140
<v Speaker 1>I think that's been a big reason why we have

0:47:58.180 --> 0:48:03.390
<v Speaker 1>tried at my hospital to sort of be very forward-facing

0:48:03.410 --> 0:48:05.730
<v Speaker 1>with other departments, with, as I mentioned before, with the ICUs,

0:48:06.610 --> 0:48:09.390
<v Speaker 1>with the pediatrics department who took care of this patient,

0:48:09.790 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with the medicine department, and try to get them involved

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.580
<v Speaker 1>and show them, you know, what it is we can do,

0:48:16.340 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because we need as much support as we can get

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.569
<v Speaker 1>to make this treatment available to all the people who

0:48:22.590 --> 0:48:23.310
<v Speaker 1>could benefit from it.

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:26.190
<v Speaker 3>Kind of along those lines, you know, whether it's sort

0:48:26.210 --> 0:48:30.660
<v Speaker 3>of availability or the procedure itself, what do you see

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:34.140
<v Speaker 3>as maybe some of the biggest limitations that are facing

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:35.390
<v Speaker 3>ECT today?

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:40.609
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest limitation is access to treatment without question. Obviously,

0:48:42.830 --> 0:48:45.990
<v Speaker 1>maybe that sounds contradictory given the numbers I gave you earlier.

0:48:46.010 --> 0:48:48.790
<v Speaker 1>I think we've worked very hard at our institution to

0:48:48.870 --> 0:48:52.689
<v Speaker 1>establish access to treatment because we really believe in this therapy.

0:48:53.210 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But nationally, it is not easy to find ECT providers.

0:48:58.860 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not easy if you can find one. To find

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>one who can do it at the sort of large

0:49:05.340 --> 0:49:08.739
<v Speaker 1>scale that's sometimes required, given the number of patients that

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:11.780
<v Speaker 1>can benefit from it. And then there are a variety

0:49:11.820 --> 0:49:15.089
<v Speaker 1>of sort of specialty areas. For example, as we may

0:49:15.110 --> 0:49:17.029
<v Speaker 1>get to down the road, there are more and more

0:49:17.070 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>patients in the pediatric population with osteoporosis. with autoimmune encephalitis

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:25.530
<v Speaker 1>being identified as catatonic. And there's much less experience even

0:49:25.570 --> 0:49:28.630
<v Speaker 1>in the ECT community treating those patients than there is

0:49:28.690 --> 0:49:33.830
<v Speaker 1>treating adults. So finding someone who can provide this treatment.

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:35.509
<v Speaker 2>Is very difficult.

0:49:35.550 --> 0:49:38.690
<v Speaker 1>I think the patient with autoimmune encephalitis who may have

0:49:38.710 --> 0:49:41.370
<v Speaker 1>mentioned came from out of state and we've had numerous

0:49:41.410 --> 0:49:46.029
<v Speaker 1>patients come, particularly pediatric patients come to us, although not exclusively,

0:49:46.090 --> 0:49:48.970
<v Speaker 1>also adult patients come to us from out of state

0:49:49.350 --> 0:49:52.819
<v Speaker 1>simply because they could not find the treatment readily available

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in their area or they could not find treaters with

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 1>experience in their area. So to me, that's the biggest barrier.

0:50:00.260 --> 0:50:04.010
<v Speaker 1>And there are a variety of reasons why that's the case,

0:50:04.270 --> 0:50:05.990
<v Speaker 1>but we need to overcome that first.

0:50:07.390 --> 0:50:11.049
<v Speaker 2>So looking to the future now, I'm guessing that one

0:50:11.070 --> 0:50:13.779
<v Speaker 2>of the things you hope to see is increased availability,

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 2>increased access. What are some of your other hopes for

0:50:16.660 --> 0:50:18.989
<v Speaker 2>the future of ECT, say, in the next, you know, 5, 10,

0:50:18.969 --> 0:50:19.320
<v Speaker 2>15 years?

0:50:19.340 --> 0:50:19.410
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:50:21.550 --> 0:50:26.049
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I have so many. So, yes, certainly access is

0:50:26.090 --> 0:50:28.870
<v Speaker 1>a big one. And, you know, we take great pride

0:50:29.090 --> 0:50:30.750
<v Speaker 1>in being able to bring patients in from out of

0:50:30.810 --> 0:50:33.509
<v Speaker 1>state and treat them. But of course, it would be

0:50:33.550 --> 0:50:36.110
<v Speaker 1>better if they didn't have to travel for treatment and

0:50:36.130 --> 0:50:38.260
<v Speaker 1>they could just receive treatment at home. So I think

0:50:38.300 --> 0:50:42.020
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest one. I would like to see more

0:50:42.620 --> 0:50:46.650
<v Speaker 1>acceptance and engagement around the use of ECT. Outside of

0:50:46.670 --> 0:50:52.310
<v Speaker 1>the psychiatric community, the medical, pediatric, critical care communities often

0:50:52.350 --> 0:50:54.870
<v Speaker 1>take care of catatonic patients because they can't be taken

0:50:54.890 --> 0:50:58.030
<v Speaker 1>care of in a psychiatric setting or because their catatonia

0:50:58.070 --> 0:51:02.529
<v Speaker 1>is not due to a psychiatric illness. And those are

0:51:02.570 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 1>patients that often, even if they're in a place where

0:51:05.910 --> 0:51:09.050
<v Speaker 1>ECT is accessible, do not receive it simply because there's

0:51:09.090 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 1>not the knowledge or comfort on the part of their

0:51:11.739 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>primary teams taking care of them. More spreading of knowledge

0:51:17.620 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to those communities and also more spreading of knowledge by

0:51:20.739 --> 0:51:24.440
<v Speaker 1>those communities, more advocacy from those communities, which I think

0:51:24.460 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we have started to see, particularly in pediatrics in the

0:51:28.180 --> 0:51:30.610
<v Speaker 1>last few years. I'd, of course, like to see a

0:51:30.890 --> 0:51:35.290
<v Speaker 1>greater understanding of mechanism. I think we have a much

0:51:35.350 --> 0:51:39.830
<v Speaker 1>better understanding of what ECT does to the brain than

0:51:39.870 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we did 10 or 20 years ago at this point.

0:51:43.410 --> 0:51:47.370
<v Speaker 1>But still, we can't say with great certainty why it works.

0:51:47.390 --> 0:51:50.489
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, we can't say that the reason it

0:51:50.510 --> 0:51:52.910
<v Speaker 1>works for depression is the same reason that it works

0:51:52.969 --> 0:51:55.410
<v Speaker 1>for catatonia or the same reason it works for psychosis.

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:58.620
<v Speaker 1>It's a global treatment, so it may have different effects

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:02.379
<v Speaker 1>on different illnesses, and we don't understand that. So I'd

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:06.060
<v Speaker 1>certainly like us to make progress in that area.

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:10.890
<v Speaker 2>It is such an incredible... therapy to think about this

0:52:10.969 --> 0:52:15.630
<v Speaker 2>is one of our oldest somatic therapies in psychiatry. It's

0:52:15.690 --> 0:52:19.740
<v Speaker 2>still around today and there's so much misinformation surrounding it.

0:52:19.810 --> 0:52:21.890
<v Speaker 2>And so I think that it has been a real

0:52:21.910 --> 0:52:25.660
<v Speaker 2>eye-opening experience to kind of get to research these two episodes,

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:27.819
<v Speaker 2>to get to chat with you and hear about all

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 2>of the different applications of ECT. So yeah, thank you

0:52:31.780 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 2>so much for taking the time. Yeah, thank you so much.

0:52:35.110 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>It's my pleasure. I think I appreciate it more than

0:52:38.110 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys do, because we need every outlet we can

0:52:41.900 --> 0:52:47.980
<v Speaker 1>to give real positive and fact-based information to the public,

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>because there is so much information given to the public

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:55.250
<v Speaker 1>that's not reliable. And sometimes that drowns out our voices.

0:52:55.450 --> 0:52:58.049
<v Speaker 1>So very grateful to you guys for having me on.

0:53:21.770 --> 0:53:25.250
<v Speaker 2>That was so great. Thank you so much, Dr. Lopez,

0:53:25.290 --> 0:53:28.430
<v Speaker 2>for taking the time to chat with us. Yeah. So informative.

0:53:28.550 --> 0:53:31.570
<v Speaker 3>And sharing all of your expertise. It really makes a

0:53:31.610 --> 0:53:34.020
<v Speaker 3>huge difference to have someone who really knows.

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:38.259
<v Speaker 2>We try our best, but let's be honest. We try.

0:53:38.380 --> 0:53:38.739
<v Speaker 1>We try.

0:53:38.780 --> 0:53:42.940
<v Speaker 2>But it really does help. That was fascinating. You know, Erin,

0:53:42.980 --> 0:53:45.410
<v Speaker 2>I had like one last quick question. Of course you do.

0:53:45.420 --> 0:53:49.020
<v Speaker 2>Because I know that ECT is often mentioned alongside other

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:50.760
<v Speaker 2>therapies that are similar.

0:53:50.780 --> 0:53:50.860
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Like TMS. TMS. Do you have like a brief little

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:56.230
<v Speaker 2>blurb about it?

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 3>You know I do, Erin, because you know I know

0:53:58.100 --> 0:53:59.299
<v Speaker 3>what questions you're going to ask.

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:01.259
<v Speaker 2>It's true. It's true. I know your brain.

0:54:01.890 --> 0:54:07.790
<v Speaker 3>So yes, TMS, or transcranial magnetic stimulation... is the other

0:54:07.830 --> 0:54:09.589
<v Speaker 3>thing that people often talk about when they're talking about

0:54:09.670 --> 0:54:14.540
<v Speaker 3>ECT for especially affective disorders like depression. Technically, it's RTMS

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:18.240
<v Speaker 3>because it's repetitive TMS, but that's neither here nor there. Basically,

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:23.219
<v Speaker 3>this uses electromagnetic stimulation. So using a really strong magnet

0:54:23.500 --> 0:54:26.830
<v Speaker 3>to generate a magnetic field that's able to then induce

0:54:26.930 --> 0:54:30.470
<v Speaker 3>an electric field in our brains and depolarize our neurons.

0:54:30.790 --> 0:54:33.069
<v Speaker 3>In some way, that's kind of the same thing that

0:54:33.090 --> 0:54:36.069
<v Speaker 3>we're doing with ECT, just using a magnet. Yeah. Which

0:54:36.150 --> 0:54:38.430
<v Speaker 3>means that the electric field that it's generating is not

0:54:38.590 --> 0:54:41.700
<v Speaker 3>nearly as strong as it is in ECT, which means

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.180
<v Speaker 3>it does not stimulate a seizure.

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:54:46.739 --> 0:54:50.460
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is they usually do it, they stimulate muscle

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.319
<v Speaker 3>contraction of the thumb, and that's how they know that

0:54:53.340 --> 0:54:55.540
<v Speaker 3>they're in the right spot and doing the right thing.

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:57.220
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that interesting?

0:54:57.360 --> 0:55:00.100
<v Speaker 3>One of the big benefits, though, of TMS compared to

0:55:00.140 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 3>ECT is that the risk of cognitive effects like memory

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 3>loss is substantially lower. We basically don't see it. We

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:07.930
<v Speaker 3>don't see the same types of amnesia that we see

0:55:07.950 --> 0:55:11.629
<v Speaker 3>with ECT. However, most of the data does suggest that

0:55:11.690 --> 0:55:15.210
<v Speaker 3>while it is probably effective and more effective than placebo,

0:55:15.330 --> 0:55:19.050
<v Speaker 3>it is still not as effective as ECT in terms

0:55:19.190 --> 0:55:22.969
<v Speaker 3>of remission and response, especially for depressive disorders, which is

0:55:23.030 --> 0:55:26.100
<v Speaker 3>mostly what we're using TMS for. Okay. There's also sometimes

0:55:26.140 --> 0:55:28.540
<v Speaker 3>people will talk about other things like DBS or deep

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 3>brain stimulation or VNS, which is vagal nerve stimulation. These

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 3>are things that we mostly use for either like Parkinson's

0:55:34.340 --> 0:55:36.860
<v Speaker 3>in the case of DBS or refractory epilepsy in the

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:40.540
<v Speaker 3>case of VNS. But these like require the implantation of devices.

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:44.319
<v Speaker 3>And so those are kind of different. And then there's

0:55:44.360 --> 0:55:49.500
<v Speaker 3>also interest in actually using magnetic stimulation to induce seizures

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 3>to see if that somehow by using magnets to induce

0:55:54.180 --> 0:55:57.529
<v Speaker 3>the electric field And then also get the seizure, which

0:55:57.570 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 3>we know is the main thing that's giving us benefit

0:55:59.700 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 3>in ECT. Does that have less memory effects? But as

0:56:03.540 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 3>far as I could tell, that's still just in the

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:07.690
<v Speaker 3>research realm. So we don't have like availability of that yet.

0:56:08.230 --> 0:56:10.089
<v Speaker 2>Okay. It's a great question though. And do you know what?

0:56:10.650 --> 0:56:13.090
<v Speaker 3>People might have so many more questions after this, and

0:56:13.130 --> 0:56:14.529
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you where to learn more.

0:56:14.550 --> 0:56:15.650
<v Speaker 2>Tell us, tell us.

0:56:16.010 --> 0:56:18.529
<v Speaker 3>A book that I actually loved so much, which was

0:56:18.570 --> 0:56:24.100
<v Speaker 3>by Kellner from 2012. It was called Brain Stimulation in Psychiatry, ECT, DBS, TMS,

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 3>and Other Modalities. It was a very comprehensive book. Really

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:32.930
<v Speaker 3>loved it. There was also, honestly, there was so many papers.

0:56:33.310 --> 0:56:35.150
<v Speaker 2>One by Merkel et al. from 2009 called.

0:56:37.380 --> 0:56:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Antidepressant Electroconvulsive Therapy, Mechanism of Action, Recent Advances and Limitations.

0:56:43.030 --> 0:56:44.750
<v Speaker 3>Another one by Kritzer et al from 2023, so much

0:56:44.770 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 3>more recent. An Electroconvulsive Therapy Mechanism of Action, Clinical Considerations,

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:52.180
<v Speaker 3>and Future Directions. Honestly, I have a very, very, very

0:56:52.219 --> 0:56:52.660
<v Speaker 3>long list.

0:56:52.860 --> 0:56:54.739
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that you do. So I'm not going to

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:55.020
<v Speaker 2>read them.

0:56:54.980 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 3>All, but you can find them all on our website, thispodcastwillkillyou.com,

0:56:57.640 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 3>where you can find the list of sources from this

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:00.529
<v Speaker 3>episode and every one that we've ever done.

0:57:00.870 --> 0:57:04.430
<v Speaker 2>Yes. A big thank you again to Dr. Leonardo Lopez.

0:57:04.510 --> 0:57:07.670
<v Speaker 2>That was so helpful, so wonderful. And check out the

0:57:07.690 --> 0:57:10.110
<v Speaker 2>Advances in Care episode if you want to hear more

0:57:10.210 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 2>about that story of the NMDA receptor encephalitis and ECT.

0:57:13.570 --> 0:57:18.750
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music for

0:57:18.830 --> 0:57:19.890
<v Speaker 3>this episode and all.

0:57:19.790 --> 0:57:23.950
<v Speaker 2>Of our episodes. Yes, thank you. Thank you to Liana

0:57:24.050 --> 0:57:27.070
<v Speaker 2>and Mark and Jess and Pete and everyone at Exactly

0:57:27.130 --> 0:57:30.580
<v Speaker 2>Right who helps make this podcast happen. We really appreciate it.

0:57:30.580 --> 0:57:32.419
<v Speaker 3>We couldn't do it without you. And we also couldn't

0:57:32.460 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 3>do it without you, listeners and watchers.

0:57:35.020 --> 0:57:37.340
<v Speaker 2>So thank you. Thank you. Literally, thank you so much.

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:37.980
<v Speaker 1>Truly.

0:57:38.220 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Really, truly. It's, yeah, you let us keep making this.

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll keep making it as long as we can.

0:57:43.010 --> 0:57:43.230
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:57:43.510 --> 0:57:46.410
<v Speaker 2>And thank you to our wonderful, generous patrons. We truly

0:57:46.470 --> 0:57:48.530
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your support. It means everything.

0:57:48.550 --> 0:57:49.010
<v Speaker 3>It does. It does.

0:57:50.060 --> 0:57:52.570
<v Speaker 2>Well, until next time, wash your hands.

0:57:52.690 --> 0:57:53.540
<v Speaker 3>You filthy animals.