WEBVTT - 04/14/2021 - Hour 2 - Irving vs Schroder

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. Good morning, everybody. Welcome into the show. The

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>fill ins, the replacements, the scabs, we're here. We're Dan

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Patrick and the Dan Nets. Yeah they're taking the day off.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm LaVar Arrington, t J. Hushman's out of Plexico Birds,

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise known as the up On Game Crew. We're taking

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>over right now and we're filling in. So you guys,

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know Dan and Dan. That's y'all. Y'all enjoy yourselves today,

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, do some gardening, you know, mow your lawn.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>That's like the new trend going on right now. We're

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go ahead and handle this thing. You're an

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>hour two. If you're just coming into the show, we

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you coming in. If you've been listening, well, appreciate

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that as well. You can listen Fox Sports Radio dot

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>com if you're sitting at your desk and not in

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>your car, and you can also download us at the

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio app you know, or whatever, you know, the

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Apple app wherever you get your your downloads for your podcast.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>If you want to check us out, check out Dan

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show, and you know, make sure you check out

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>up on game as well. All Right, so we first hour, guys,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we we tackled some draft discussions. We we tackled some

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame debates about Julian Edelman, and we kind

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of had some interesting conversation about that. Now we're in

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the second hour, and I want to switch gears on

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>y'all and I want to see where y'all are at

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on this one. And we were getting text messages the

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>entire time when the Lakers were downing the Brooklyn Nets

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>from one Homer and big fan um t J Hushman's

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>out up. Let me preface this everyone out there that

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he is a big time h LA Lakers fan. So

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>h with that being said, he may not be able

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to give us a clear U very very um you know,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>good take on this, but we're gonna still take a

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:59.919
<v Speaker 1>chance on it. So we had the situation where didn't

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Shrewder and Kyrie Irving get tangled up at the end

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of the game up, you know, clearly the Brooklyn Nets

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to lose. And was he salty? Was Kyrie

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>salty or was he well intended? When the exchange between

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>them turned into a situation. Here's Dennis Shrewder's take on

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the situation and then I'll introduce the rest of the

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>topic after this. I didn't know at first that we

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>got double technicals when he came up to me. That's

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the first thing. But after that, I asked him. I

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>kept asking him what he is talking about, and he

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>kept talking, kept talking. Then he got kicked out or

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>got the second technical, and I just, I mean, I said, bye,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably I don't even know if I raised him.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I probably did. And then she said, you're

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>going to because he raped that up. And I didn't

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>even know I got the you know, first technical with

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>him when he came up to me. But it happened.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't take it back. Let's just turn them move

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>forward now, Okay. This comes after the the reports that

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Shrewder used the inn word while speaking to Kyrie Irving,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which in turn inflamed Kyrie. Kyrie sang and I quote

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the in word is a derogatory racial slur, Irving wrote

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on his Twitter after the game. He explained that the

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>word will never be a term of endearment. Never forget,

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's foul and it's true history. Throw the inn word

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>out the window right alongside all of those other racist

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>words used to describe my people. He added, we are

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not slaves or ends. So and this, and listen, I

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>watched the video. I don't know if y'all seen the video.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>He definitely says it. He definitely said it. And and

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a good lip reader, and I saw

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that that. You know, if you if you put it

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in slow motion and you run it back, you definitely

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can make out that he used the word in the

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>change slow motion. Brother, you got to do your homework,

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure you can come on the radio and speak

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>confidently about it. And I end up getting no defamation

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of character calls from any lawyers or anything like that.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>But what y'all's take on this, man, because this is

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>one of those This is one of those slippery slope

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>debates for a lot of different reasons. For the rap industry,

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for the you know, the music industry in general, you know,

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>for certain you know, genres of music, uh, movies and entertainment,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>regular everyday life. That word is now and this is

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>crazy to think, but that word now, it has even

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>become larger than just the specific race of people using

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the word. What what say you to this approach? That

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>was this more of Kyrie being upset that they lost

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Lakers, and and he turned that into parlaying

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it into a bigger topic or was there some was

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there something there where you say, you know what, this

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is something that really needs to be paid attention to.

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of social unrest going on right now.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of things taking place in terms of uh,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the mistreatment of racial groups. And obviously when

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you think about that word, that's connected to a lot

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>of the struggles and and the fights that are taking

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>place right now for for equality and and and different

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>things that are are out there. What's your take on this?

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, for me, when the game was

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't decided when Kyrie uh and he when him and

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Shooter when they got into it, it was actually a

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>competitive game. The game could have gone either way. It

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>was when Kyrie and Shrewder got kicked out, the Lakers

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of went on a big run and took over

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the game. That word and the black community has become

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a term in endearment for a lot of us. And

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll be the first one to admit I say the word,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and I actually said often and I don't even think

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. It just comes out. It's like it just

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I speak it freely, And if Kyrie feels that way

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>about it, I respect that. I have no problem with

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>someone not wanting to be called a word that he

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>feels is derogatory. That's his preference. If I was a

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>friend of his, I would try to refrain from using

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it around him. If we are friends, Kyrie has to

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>also understand because he's been enlightened and he doesn't use

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that word. I'm sure he wants used that word. And

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>for us, and when I say us, I mean us

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>black men and just women, and just the black culture period,

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we use that word as a term of endearment, and

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>so I get where Kyrie Iren is coming from. He

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like that word to be used around him anymore,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and it will be very tough, in my opinion, to

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>get our culture to stop using that word, because we

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>turned something that was once a derogatory statement into a

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>term of endearment. And I don't know if you two

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>use it, but again, do you know you know I

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>use it and it almost as much as you do.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And for me it's it's all love. But I can

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>respect where Kyrie is coming from. The thing that I

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>don't get what Kyrie is. You played twenty games last year.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You didn't play in a bubble. You didn't want people

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to play in the bubble. You get kicked out of

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the game, and then you don't play the next game.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Be there for your teammates. They need you on the court.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>They care more about you being on the court. If

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a socialist and impact your community,

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that's great, but your teammates need you. You should have

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>played the next game. If you're physically able to play.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You're an athlete. You get paid to play basketball games.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Play basketball games. With all that being said, you know

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the vast statium that we know that through to you

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>know definitely you know use the N word, and it's

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a word that you know we use, and you know

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I use. I wish we could say it, I really do.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I hate that we got to say N word, but

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, But I really didn't understand why the referee

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>got in between these two guys and kick them out

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for having a heated conversation basically, so to speak. You

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>know clearly the NBA is in the early eighties and

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>late eighties nineties, because you know, a lot of those

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>things were going on, and it would just looked at

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as normal, so to speak. So for the referee to

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>kick both of those guys out of the game for

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess Shooter using the N word and them having

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a confrontation. I've never witnessed a referee eject two guys

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>from a from a basketball game if the interaction or

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the words between the player between the referee so like

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>there was no physical contact but between the two. So

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>he just should have gave him the technical, you know,

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the first technical and kept it moving. But why he

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>got involved with those two guys in the in the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>verbiage that was spit out between the two and he

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had no interaction or it wasn't directed towards him, that

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he thought that it was derogatory enough to kick those guys,

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:03.599
<v Speaker 1>the guys out of the game for having a u

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the conversation that that's just something that that that I

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>won't understand. And and it was the first time that

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys have ever been ejected from a

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>basketball game. So not not saying that you know they

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have an image that is, you know,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>clean or whatever the case may be. But you know,

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as long as I've known, uh, you know, Schroder and

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and Kylerie irving on the court. All they really do

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is just go out and play basketball when they when

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they're available, and and and go out and compete and

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>do it at a high level. So I didn't understand

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>why the Revere kick those guys out. You know. Secondly,

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of things going on, you

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>know in this world. You know, as we see and

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and and certain people, you know during this time, you know,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody is a little sensitive to us being thrown at them.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>You know what, it doesn't matter you know, what color

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you are, where you come from, or it's there's a

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of different things going on in this world that

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that that that people are more sensitive to with everything

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that's going on. You know, Kyrie's right, you know, Shrewder

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was wrong or whatever the case may be. But just

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know TJ said, if he wants to go

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>out and you know, and you know, you know, get

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>into the communities and socialism and all those things, that

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's his deal. But as far as when it comes

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to playing basketball into you know the commented, you know,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in that context, you know, you know, Kyrie Irv is

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>from New Jersey, you know, Irvington right down the street,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a predominantly you know, black community, So I'm

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure that he has heard this word or used

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it a few times himself. I'm just I'm just saying

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't make it right or wrong. But you know,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I looking back at it, you know, I don't think

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the referee should have got in between those guys and

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>objected them for just you know, a word that I

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>guess the referee thought it was the rugatory to him,

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and he those guys out of the game.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So it just never should have happened at the end

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the day. My my take on it. First off,

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I can always remember the first time I really got

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>acclimated to the word and the reason why I just

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's not misconstrue when I said I wish we

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>could say the word. Um. The reason why I say

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that is is because now saying in word really really

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>makes it into you know, like a taboo situation. Right.

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's like I literally use the word and

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>then I got acclimated to it through Tupac. I mean,

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just be honest with you. When I heard him

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>say never ignorant getting getting gold to accomplish, I thought

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty dope. Um, I love Tupac's music. I

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>subscribed to his messaging and and how he you know,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>how he flowed, and I kind of got acclimated into, um,

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>what that represented. Now. Have I always used a word

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>with the idea of term it of endearment or or

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the empowerment of taking a negative word and

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>using it positively and spending it. No, I'd be lying.

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd be disingenuous if I was saying that it just

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>became a habit. It's a it's a word that is

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>almost like saying, you know, homye, buddy, my guy. Whatever

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it may be, it's it's a part of it became

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a part of my language. And I got a pretty

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>good vocabulary, so it's not as though I'm ignorant. But

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I can understand when the conversation turns into this is

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a conversation I heard enlightened. It can turn into a

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>conversation of enlightenment versus ignorance. And I'm not necessarily sure

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's really the road to go down on this,

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, to be honest with you, during the course

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of that game, there's probably ten different words that that

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie could have said, don't use that word. It's a

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>derogatory term. And and it could have been a female dog.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It could have been a mother sucker, it could have

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>been you know what, it could have been a lot

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of different terms that I'm sure within the parameters of

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>what took place in the game that there were derogatory

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.239
<v Speaker 1>terms that were taking place during the trash talk exchanges

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>between players. So, for first off, I would I would

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately jump out there and say that in the in

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the I guess the parameters of of competing in a game,

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>trash talk has always been a part of sport. And

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be the first one to tell you if

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I could say something to you that is going to

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>get you off of your game, Like like if if

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I knew if I was playing right now and this

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>took place, and I knew I had him on my schedule,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>do you understand what I would do to him if

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we were on the field together. Every time I tackle him,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>every time I hit him, do you understand what I'm

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>doing to him? Because to me playing the game and

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>being a part of competition, people say, oh, well that's

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not good sportsmanship, and this done and the other and

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to die. I don't care if you think it's good

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>sportsmanship or if it fits into your parameters of what's

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>morally sound and morally correct. I'm trying to get I'm

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to get ahead. I'm trying to get an advantage.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And if I can get a mental emotional advantage if

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not physical, but if I can get all of

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>those boxes checked off, physical advantage, mental advantage, emotional advantage,

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>if I could take you out of your game, I'm

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna take you out of your game, and you just

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have to be prepared to deal with that. So you

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>know there, I think that the dangerous part of what

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving did here, not he's right or wrong. I

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>mean you certainly you know, with everything that's going on,

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to raise the awareness because of all of

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the hate that is circulating in our world. But I

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>also would urge to say, when you sit there and

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you try to do it in the context of painting

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>shrewder in a way like he's this ignorant dude that

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't use those that word around him, and people should

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to throw that word out and don't use

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it anymore, and this, that, and the other. You're within

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the parameters of competitive sport and you're all adults. So

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to me, you have to look at it from the

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>perspective of how you're presenting your argument and presenting what

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it is that that you have going on. If if

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's social activism, active activists work that you're doing, which

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he has been a part of that, I get that.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I get that you want to continue to move your

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>agenda and keep things moving that way, and if you're

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>using that as a platform for change, I get that.

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But I look at Shrewder and I'm like, well, don't

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>paint this kid into us or this guy into a

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>situation where you're making him out to be some type

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of villain when he's you know, kind of he's competing.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna say things and do things. The person that

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I was on the football field was not the person

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I was walking around as an everyday person. The things

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I say and doing how I say and do them

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are very, very vastly different than how I am when

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I was on the competitive field or court or whatever

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it may be. So I felt like that it was

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of it makes sense what Kyrie is saying, And

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I do believe in the grand scheme of things. The

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>more you understand that you in a lot of ways

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>perpetuate how some people view us and fill us. You know,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I've heard a lot of people justify calling people the

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>end word with the hard er at the end versus

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the GA right and and and said, well, you guys

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>call yourself, you each other, that you use it, why

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>can't I use it? You know, there is a lot

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of things that can be interpreted, um from the word.

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of meanings connected to the word.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But in this in this instance, in this particular one guys,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I kind of felt like, you know, I don't know,

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving. You can you can say that upset you,

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and you could say that, you know, Shrewder shouldn't use it.

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But I almost felt like, maybe that's that's one of

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>those conversations that you have with Shrewder, And I don't

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>know that you turn that into the biggest public spectacle

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>um based upon you know, the situation. But that's just

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>one man's opinion. You're listening to the Dan Patrick Show.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm LaVar Arrington, that's t J. Hushman's out of Plexico Burrst.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We all have opinions, um, but you know, it is

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>what it is. We're gonna keep we're gonna stay with basketball.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I got a fun little, uh little little question for

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys on the other side of the break. It's

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a pick pick between the two guys type of conversation

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and it has to do out in the West. Yeah.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's Fox Sports Radio. Make sure you stay tuned

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know we're gonna come back and we're gonna

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have a little debate and I think you guys will

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. Stay tuned. Thanks for listening to The Dan

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to nine Pacific

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us on

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app at FSR, or stream us live on

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the Peacock app. All right, welcome back, Welcome back. Uh yeah,

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to The Dan Patrick Show with Lev Arrington,

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>T J. Huschman, Zata, Plexico, Burrus, Discover. You know, have

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you got your Discover card yet? You know, Discover matches

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all the cash back you can earn on your credit

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>card at the end of your first year. It's amazing

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>because Discovers accepted at ninety nine percent of places in

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the US that take credit cards. Learn more at Discovered

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Yes twenty twenty one Nielsen Report limitations

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>do apply. Okay, welcome back to the show everyone. I

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>want to switch gears a little bit and and talk

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>about two very very bright stars and in the basketball

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>National Basketball Association right now, and and get your opinion

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on this, uh, Devin Booker and Donovan Mitchell. Now, these

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>guys are playing some amazing basketball and doing some pretty

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal things. And I just wanted to put it out

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>there to you guys, if you were taking a guy

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in the draft or a trade for your team, which

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys would you take? Which side are

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you going on? Who you gonna with, who you're gonna

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>build around? Flaques. I'll let you go first, mister man.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>This this Ray here's a tough one for me because

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, just last week we was having this great,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this great conversation about Donovan Mitchell and I called him

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a tarantula, you know, running up and down the basketball court.

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what he you know, he kind of reminds me

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of in his playing style. But you know, I've said this,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know when when Donovan Mitchell was coming out of college,

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, Rick Patino told all the scouts and the

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>owners that he was arguably the best point guard that

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he had ever coached. And you know, nobody really paid

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>attention to him. So did you look at Donovan Mitchell

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and you look at Devin Booker? And when when when

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they told me that Devin Booker had went to Kentucky.

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know that he went into Kentucky because

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>he was never spoke about because he played with card

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Off any Towns, Willie Carlistein and the Harrison Twins, Andrew

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron, so Booker was overlooked. Nobody was talking about

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker. But so you know, I didn't even know

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>he was at Kentucky until he did say when he

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was coming out though he's gonna be the best player

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. I remember him. He did say that, Yes,

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't even know that he went into Kentucky

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>because he played with such a great other four that

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was never really you know, a star

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or was mentioned. But if I'm a GM knowing what

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I know now, and I love me from Donovan Mitchell, man,

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>y'll y'all know how I feel about him. I think

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>he has the whole entire skill set of becoming the

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>next great star and point guard in the NBA. But

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about building a franchise and somebody being

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a cornerstone of your organization, I'm gonna have to go

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>with Devin Booker because the more and more I watched

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this young man play, you know, he's a more athletic

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Miller. You know he's gonna run you off for

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>screens and you're gonna have to know where he is

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at on the basketball court at all times. And then

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>when he pulls that jump shot, man, it's so pure,

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not pure per it's purer and man, I watched him

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>last night and you know when he pulls up fifteen

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen foot this man, the ball doesn't even touch

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the rim. And he you can put him on any

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>basketball team in the NBA, and I honestly to believe

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that he would have the same impact on any basketball

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>team that you put him on, because he just has

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a universal basketball game that you can plug him into anywhere.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And with the addition of Chris Paul coming in which

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>t J thinks that Chris Paul is still one of

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the top five point guards in basketball, I disagree, but

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he Devin Booker is shining more and I heard Charles

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Buckler say this the other night, there's a there's a

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>great chance that every night that Devin Booker steps on

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the basketball court that he's the best player on the floor,

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and and and and I think that's high remarks, you know,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>especially coming from Charles Barkley and watching this young man

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>grow and become a phenom in this league and being

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>an elite player, that almost every night that he stepped

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on my basketball court, that he's the best player on

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the floor. And you know, you know, with that all

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>being said, you know, knowing what we know now, not

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out of college, if you're going to build an

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>organization and build an NBA team, you can plug Devin

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Booker in anywhere and he will still put up twenty

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>six points a night. Before but before a Plex gave

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>us his answer, I was actually leaning Davin Booker myself,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of dove into it a little more

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>when he said he's a more athletic Reggie Miller that

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>he is doesn't shoot the ball as well as Reggie Millie.

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Davin Booker is a thirty five percent career three point shooter.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Donovan Mitchell and Plex really made

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>me look into it it as he was talking, and

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at it from this perspective. Donovan Mitchell is

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the man on his team. They're both twenty four years old.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>The Phoenix Suns and Devin Booker haven't had success in

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Last year in the Bubble they did well.

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>They haven't had any success. Chris Paul comes in and

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, they're a good team. Donovan Mitchell's

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Utah Jazz team has had success, big success, and he's

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the lead dog, he's the engine, he's the reason they go.

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And so for me, Devin Booker can play. But if

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you ask, you're asking me who would I want to

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.239
<v Speaker 1>start my franchise When he's only two guys I can

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pick and choose from. I'm gonna go with Donovan Mitchell

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's proven to me already he can be that

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>guy on the team and take his team to the playoffs.

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Have they reached a pinnacle, absolutely not. But Devin Booker

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as yet's even getting the playoffs and do damage. And

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>so the bubble last year the Suns did very very well.

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm talking before that. Yeah, he put up points

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and he can shoot the ball, but I want Donovan

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell because I know he's going to leave my team.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Devin Booker can do that. You know,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I liked this debate is because the

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Suns are in second place overall in the Western Conference

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Jazz or first. You actually stole a little

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of my thunder on this one, TJ. I really

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>look at Donovan Mitchell as the catalyst of why the

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Utah Jazz are playing so well, why they were dangerous

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs last year. I can recall when he

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>had his coming out party in the playoffs and it

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>was like, man, who is this guy? I'm going with

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell as well. I just think that when I

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>look at as you call him, the Tarantula, and how

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>he handles himself on the court, um his leadership qualities

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>as he goes the Utah Jazz go. When I look

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>at these two teams and I say which team is

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>closer to competing for a championship, I look at Utah

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there. I think they are a

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>legit competitor to try to get to the finals this season.

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>When I look at the Phoenix Suns, I still think

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's holes as I think that when you think

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>about the catalysts, Yes, Booker is the catalyst for for

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that team, but it's debatable and nothing more more telling

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>than the All Star selections, right Like you take CP

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>three over Donovan, I mean over a Booker, so Devin

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>so to me, I mean, he wasn't even considered to

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.239
<v Speaker 1>be the best player on his team as it was

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>voted by by you know, the fans and the NBA.

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So I just I just look at Donovan Mitchell and

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I say, he's a He's a talent that you cannot deny.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Um is the catalyst and is the leader and is

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the reason why they are leading the Western Conference. And

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people love to disrespect Utah

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and say they'll fall on their face as they get

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs, and there are a lot of different

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>things that could happen. But when I look at the

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>other players on that team and mainly go Bear and

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and that relationship, other than the COVID incident, they've been,

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've been this one two punch that is

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>very very uh you know, respectable and the only reason

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>why it's a respectable duo in combination Um as a

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>big and as a front court guy or well backcourt

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>guy is because of Donovan and and and I look

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>at his ability to create, his ability to score, his

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>ability to tack the rim um. Their numbers statistically are

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>very comparable. Their numbers and in minutes played there, the

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers in scoring, their numbers and assists, their numbers and

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>stills all very comparable. So when the things are as

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>close as you know, the stats, the measurements on that

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>end are so close that you have to go into

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at other aspects of their game, I would say,

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>who is the facilitator, Who is the dictator? Who? Who?

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Who is the game changer? When you're looking at players,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and that can be different players, that can be different

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>players on Phoenix, there are different players. Like I think

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>CP three is the facilitator right there there. I look

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>at at certain components of the Phoenix Suns, and I

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think that all three of those categories do not rest

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on Booker's shoulders. But in Utah, the facilitator, the game changer,

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the dictator, all of those titles belong to to my guy,

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell. And so to me, I would start with

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Donovan if it were up to me. Yeah, I get

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, I understand you know your point, but

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know you went to talk to speaking about, you know,

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the team of the Utah Jazz and the Phoenix Suns,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and TJ said, spoke about Phoenix Suns haven't had any success.

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, DeAndre Ayton is still young obviously, Devin book

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>He's only twenty four. But when you talk about the

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>contrast of both teams, do Utah Jazz strictly basically rely

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on three point shot and they're going to be nice

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>when that three point shot is not going down? And

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>when you look at teams who are more fit to

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>make a run in the playoffs and and who can

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and can adapt to a different style of play with

0:30:55.800 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Phoenix Suns, the Utah Jazz really don't have a

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>big man that that I can play down in the post.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And then didn't you add Chris Paul with Devin Booker

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Ayton. You know, granted, Donovan Mitchell can take over

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a basketball game whenever he wants to, but that's just

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, he's the catalyst, he is the big dog.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But what what what happens when the big dogs three

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>point shot is not going down? He has nobody else

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to lean on too. So I think that's gonna be

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the achilles heels of the Utah Jazz and the playoffs.

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Can they continue to make the three point shot? Because

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's if that they can't shoot it with the consistency

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're shooting it with it now, it's gonna be

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>tough for them in the playoffs to make a run. Well,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Utahs consistently shot the ball. Well, now you taught Jazz

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>they're a good basketball team, but we know, but the

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>shot is not always not always going down like the

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>way the But do they I don't believe they have

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance of winning the NBA Championship. They can win.

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Why not they have they have the best record in

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the US. Why do you think they have to win?

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Lakers if you're right about but they've had they've had

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>great health, They've they've had great healthy they don't have

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the injuries that other teams to have. And I just

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>believe in a seven game series, when you talk a

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>seven game series, you might lose a game or two,

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, the best team normally wins.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And when you start playing teams in their top two

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>players or top three players might be better than everybody

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on your team, it's hard to win, and so you

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>taught they're going to be competitive with everybody, and it

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>starts and it ends with Donovan Mitchell. And so if

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>they can shoot the three ball in the playoffs the

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>way they've been shooting, they'll prove me wrong. But history

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>has shown that that's not the case unless you're to

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>go to State Warriors, and they were ahead of the

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>curve with all this three points shooting it, and now

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody's doing it, and so they have a way to

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>defend it. But I'm rolling with Donovan Mitchell just because

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he has proven to be a leader on the team

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that he is the guy if he if he doesn't go,

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't win. All right, Well, that's a debate that

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>will continue on. I think that you can't lose with

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>either one. I mean, as you know, what what caliber

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of gun you on. While maybe that's a bad example

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to use, but yeah, it's it's definitely two really really

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>good players and and some of some great stars and

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at that position. And speaking of great stars and at

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that position, I want to ask you guys this question.

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Steph Curry, the greatest point guard to ever play

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this game. We're going to tackle that question. On the

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>other side of this break. You're listening to The Dan

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show. I'm LeVar Rington, TJ. Houshman's Out of Plexico Burst. Yeah,

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, think about this one. We're going

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to debate that one when we'll get back. Thanks for

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>catch us live every weekday morning nine until noon eastern

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>stream us live on the Peacock app. Hey, it's me

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Rob Parker. Check out my weekly MLB podcast, Inside the

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Parker for twenty two minutes of piping hot baseball talk,

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>featuring the biggest names to newsmakers in the sport. Whether

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you believe in analytics or the iecast, We've got all

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the bases covered. New episodes drop every Thursday, so do

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>yourself a favor and listen to Inside the Parker with

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Rob Parker on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. Alrighty, alrighty, welcome back to the show. Welcome

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>back in. You're listening to The Dan Patrick Show with

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the up on Game crew. LaVar Arrington, T. J Hushman

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>is out of plexico bursts. Yeah, man, we do talk

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>other sports. I mean generally speaking, we love to talk

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>football and other things. I can't wait till we could

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>start talking about some boxing, some big boxing matches. But oh, man, man,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's right up my will for me. You know

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>that I love that boxing, baby, get it? And you

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>nerd out over the boxing deal. I get it. Man, Hey, listen,

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>gave me that check. But I want to talk about this.

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>The debate has been ever since, uh, ever since Steph

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Curry has broken the scoring record. Uh did I get

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that right? The scoring record I believe way passed Will

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Chamberlain or something like that. Um. Yeah, for the excuse me,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors franchise. There we go, all right, all time franchise,

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>all time franchise leading. What score? Right, So it's it's

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>led to the conversation of best And this is why

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get at So if I butchered that, y'all,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>y'all forgive me. Um. Best point guard ever in the

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>history of the game is now being debated as to

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry. Is Steph Curry the greatest point guard? And

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I started thinking about it, and I was like, man like,

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's an interesting it's an interesting topic because

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>here's what made it interesting for me, guys, is we

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>look at uh yeah, he became the Warriors all time

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>lead score. I apologized, passed what Chamberlain? Which to pass?

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Will Chamberlain? You know that's that's pretty crazy? Um? But

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:56.280
<v Speaker 1>who are point Like? Is there a true point guard

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>versus a point guard and a shooting guard? Because when

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>I look at Steph Curry, I immediately think that we

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>look at his ability to shoot. And we mentioned Reggie

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller in the last segment. You know, I have not

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>seen a shooter like this well ever and the closest

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.959
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen was Reggie Miller. So when I look

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at Steph Curry, am I measuring him off of being

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>what a point guard represents? Or am I measuring him

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>off of being a scorer? And so when I started

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about is he the greatest point guard of all time?

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I started thinking about other names that kind of came

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to mind. And I'll just give you my list. I mean,

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>number one on my list forever in a day is

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Magic Johnson, you know, and I think that it's very,

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>very hard to ever justify there being a better point

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>guard than Magic Johnson. He had a rare blend of

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>side ice height, He had an amazing knack and ability

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to deliver the ball and pass the ball. I just

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>think that he was the most all around point guard

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that has ever played this game, far and away. And

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>then the second one I would go to And these

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>next ones are to me debatable, but I'm a big

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Thomas guy. Okay, I'll take it. What about John

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Stockton and Oscar Robinson and oh yeah, AI can't forget

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Alan Averson. So to me, when I think of greatest

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 1>point guard of all time, it almost is where are

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we like, where do we draw the line between a

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>shooting guard the two versus the one? And if we're

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>talking a true one, then you gotta believe that John

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Stockton has to be in the conversation at the very

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>very very top in terms of facilitating an offense, leading,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>leading an offense, getting assist and really you know, kind

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of being the court general. At least, that's what my

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of a point guard would be. What say you,

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>guys man, when you when you talk basketball Steph Curry,

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>whether he goes down as the greatest point guard or not?

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's always going to be up for debate because

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody's going to have their own opinion. But what I

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>will say is he's the most influential point guarding might

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be player. And just think about this influential yes, And

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell him Alan Iverson was very influential

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the way he went about it and what he

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>brought to the culture and his swag and its tattoos.

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>When I say I'm talking influential from a basketball perspective,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>when Steph Curry came into the NBA, it was let's

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball, download a shock, lets throw the ball,

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>download to these big guys, and you know, play inside out.

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Nobody plays inside out anymore. And and that's because Steph

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Curry Klay Thompson started draining threes at a rate they

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 1>were like wait, wait, wait, wait, are they really onto

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>something from everybody copycatted what Golden State was doing, and

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that is because of Steph Curry. Nobody was shooting threes

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>from damn near half court. Now it's commonplace and Steph

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Curry started that. And so whether he's the best point

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>guard or not, I will probably say no, there's just

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so many good players. He's in the discussion, But I

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>know his influence on the game of basketball. And now

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you have guys working on the skill level before our

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>generation and plexing. We're all about the same age was

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>going outside practicing dunks, seeing what kind of ducks they

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>can do. Now guarantee guys is they're working on a

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>three point shot and they handle because of Steph Curry.

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And then when you speak about Steph Curry arguably being

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the best point guard of all time, to me, it

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>falls back and depends on what what error you grew

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up in. So you know Steph Curry just like t

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Just like TJ said, I don't know about the most influential,

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>but I just think I just think about guys. I'm

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a basketball story and guys like Walt Frazier, John Stockton

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen thousand assists, you know, Chris Paul ten thousand,

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>still trying to catch John Stockton. But it all comes

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 1>down to where are you grew up in And you're

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the best three point shooters of

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>all time. I'm still trying to wrap my mind around

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry being the the NBA all time leading three

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>point score Ray Allen, Reggie Miller, you know guys of

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that nature. When I think about three point shooting, nothing

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 1>think about those two guys. But you know, when you

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>look at this, when you look at his stats as

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>far as far as what he's doing, um, you know,

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can say in this generation, you know,

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for my for my kids, that Steph Curry is the

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>best point guard of all time. But I would disagree,

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and I will never go against the great Irvin Magic Johnson,

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>who is from who hails from East Lansing, Michigan. And

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it was also a Michigan State spartan, So Magic Johnson

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, Okay, all right, alrighty then East Lansing I

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:45.839
<v Speaker 1>have slug bring Magic up because I'm like, I knew

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Plax was bringing him up that Michigan state connection already.

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Here it's the window closing for the Dallas Cowboys to

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>win an NFC championship or is it just opening. We're

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna discuss that in the third hour. You're listening to

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dan Patrick Show. It's the up on Game Crew. Yeah,

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio. We'll talk about that when we get

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 1>back