1 00:00:04,280 --> 00:00:07,640 Speaker 1: Well, welcome back to Stephanomics and these mini episodes giving 2 00:00:07,680 --> 00:00:09,880 Speaker 1: you a taste of the conversations here at the New 3 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:14,360 Speaker 1: Economy Forum in Singapore. And today I wanted to have 4 00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:20,239 Speaker 1: a conversation with Kendra Schaeffer, who has a really interesting 5 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:24,560 Speaker 1: perspective on current debates about the future of China and 6 00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:27,560 Speaker 1: the future of U S China relations as the head 7 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:33,840 Speaker 1: of tech policy research at a Beijing based policy consultancy Triviaan. Kendra, 8 00:00:34,920 --> 00:00:37,839 Speaker 1: start by explaining a little about you, because you're just 9 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 1: your own sort of recent personal history is kind of interesting. 10 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:45,520 Speaker 1: You're based in Beijing until very recently. Yeah, absolutely, thanks 11 00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:47,840 Speaker 1: for having me. So I just left Beijing a couple 12 00:00:47,880 --> 00:00:50,599 Speaker 1: of months ago. I actually went to college in Beijing 13 00:00:51,080 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 1: in two thousand and two. I kind of intended to 14 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:56,240 Speaker 1: just stay there, you know, for a year and then 15 00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:59,200 Speaker 1: go back. I was a nerd kid. I started my 16 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 1: career as a developed for actually, and then I've just 17 00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:03,880 Speaker 1: been there for the last twenty years and my my 18 00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:06,240 Speaker 1: career kind of went from you know, I was there 19 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:08,640 Speaker 1: right at the beginning of the Internet boom, and my 20 00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:11,480 Speaker 1: career went from development to to tech policy research and 21 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,800 Speaker 1: a bizarre series of twists and turns. So yeah, I've 22 00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:17,760 Speaker 1: been there for for most of the COVID outbreak and 23 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:21,600 Speaker 1: just just kind of stepped out. And you must have 24 00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:24,319 Speaker 1: this sort of interesting phenomena recently where those people who 25 00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:28,200 Speaker 1: have managed the academics and China experts who have been 26 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:30,720 Speaker 1: able to be in China recently for one reason or another, 27 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 1: they're so rare they get sort of mobbed by people 28 00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:36,640 Speaker 1: for the kind of more recent take on on on 29 00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:39,600 Speaker 1: things in China. Has that been your experience this week 30 00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:42,640 Speaker 1: and in the last few weeks, Yeah, it absolutely has. 31 00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:46,040 Speaker 1: I mean that's been you know, exacerbated by US China tentions, 32 00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 1: but it's also been exacerbated by a kind of axodus 33 00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:54,400 Speaker 1: of China experts from China during the COVID pandemic um 34 00:01:54,480 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 1: and so nobody has been able to really get back. 35 00:01:56,840 --> 00:02:00,560 Speaker 1: I mean, US China travel cross border dial has really 36 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:02,560 Speaker 1: taken a nose dive in the last couple of years. 37 00:02:02,560 --> 00:02:05,160 Speaker 1: So yeah, there's a lot of interest in what it's 38 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:08,280 Speaker 1: really like on the ground over there, particularly since you know, 39 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:11,560 Speaker 1: China's kind of gone off on on this you know, 40 00:02:11,600 --> 00:02:14,040 Speaker 1: other timeline with COVID than the rest of the world. 41 00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:17,120 Speaker 1: So people are very interested in what's happening, and you 42 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 1: are day to day, of course, also observing what's happening 43 00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:24,120 Speaker 1: in the in the tech policy space and giving kind 44 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:26,440 Speaker 1: of daily up to you and your team might imagine 45 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:29,480 Speaker 1: are updating your clients and talking to people in a regular, 46 00:02:29,880 --> 00:02:32,920 Speaker 1: regular basis and how is your how is your business 47 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:34,640 Speaker 1: done over the last few years, I guess is one 48 00:02:34,639 --> 00:02:37,920 Speaker 1: way of putting it. Well, yeah, so basically what we 49 00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 1: do is, you know, my tech team spends all day 50 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:43,639 Speaker 1: digging around in in Chinese tech policy documents and kind 51 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:47,280 Speaker 1: of trying to explain Beijing's motivations for you know, some 52 00:02:47,320 --> 00:02:50,000 Speaker 1: of the things that have happened, particularly in the last 53 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,680 Speaker 1: couple of years. And so business is booming. It's never 54 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:56,560 Speaker 1: a dull day, especially considering we've seen you know, the 55 00:02:56,600 --> 00:02:59,800 Speaker 1: twentieth Party Congress, We've seen the tech crackdown, We've seen 56 00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:02,680 Speaker 1: you know, all of these companies kind of get hit 57 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:06,359 Speaker 1: fire hosed with new regulations coming out of Beijing. We've 58 00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:08,560 Speaker 1: seen you know, censorship increase. So there's just been a 59 00:03:08,600 --> 00:03:11,280 Speaker 1: lot of a lot of things to follow, and there's 60 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:14,639 Speaker 1: been significant interest in those things. And you were saying 61 00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:17,280 Speaker 1: to me that, you know, one of the distinguishing features 62 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:20,560 Speaker 1: of the consultancy is everybody there reads at least one 63 00:03:20,639 --> 00:03:24,519 Speaker 1: big pile of very boring policy documents every morning when 64 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:27,840 Speaker 1: it comes out. So we spend you know, I mean, 65 00:03:27,880 --> 00:03:29,960 Speaker 1: we spend a couple hours a day just digging through 66 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:32,840 Speaker 1: the latest releases from the various government agencies. But not 67 00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:36,480 Speaker 1: just that, also you know blogs from you know, policy 68 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 1: advisors and you know, other kind of micro moves from 69 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:43,240 Speaker 1: from Chinese think tanks and that kind of stuff, to 70 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 1: really kind of get a sense of these these little 71 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:48,040 Speaker 1: steps forward. Whereas the media tends to focus on the 72 00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:50,560 Speaker 1: big headlines, right, big big new movements, we kind of 73 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 1: track what's happened after those issues are not headlines anymore. 74 00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 1: But a lot of people listening to this podcast, I 75 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 1: imagine they're kind of fairly interested. I hope they're fairly 76 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: interested in the global economy, um, but then maybe not 77 00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 1: focused necessarily on what's happening in business or tech policy 78 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:09,680 Speaker 1: at any given time. When we hear that headline, you know, 79 00:04:09,760 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 1: the tech crackdown. What do you think has actually been 80 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:15,840 Speaker 1: going on over the last couple of years with what 81 00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:18,800 Speaker 1: we consider to be the tech crackdown in China? Yeah, 82 00:04:18,839 --> 00:04:22,120 Speaker 1: I mean that's a fascinating topic. It's pretty much all 83 00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:25,000 Speaker 1: anybody wanted to hear about last year, right, And because 84 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: I think it's surprised so many investors. Um. But to 85 00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:33,680 Speaker 1: be perfectly frank, it probably shouldn't have. Ultimately, what is 86 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:36,599 Speaker 1: there was a lot of things going on. Number One, 87 00:04:36,680 --> 00:04:39,880 Speaker 1: for the last fifteen years really maybe twenty years, since 88 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:44,000 Speaker 1: China's big tech companies really started to develop. Um. You know, 89 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 1: the state has struggled with figuring out where big tech 90 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 1: fits into the socialist market economy. Right. I mean, when 91 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:55,160 Speaker 1: you really think about it, it's fascinating because big tech company, 92 00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:57,360 Speaker 1: the emergence of big tech companies is the first time 93 00:04:57,760 --> 00:05:02,640 Speaker 1: that Beijing has ever had to deal with with big, private, 94 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:07,160 Speaker 1: domestic firms that are not state owned enterprises, right, And 95 00:05:07,240 --> 00:05:09,039 Speaker 1: so the state has kind of not really known what 96 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:11,480 Speaker 1: to do with big tech in that regard. And for 97 00:05:11,520 --> 00:05:14,320 Speaker 1: the first fifteen years of tech company development, to be 98 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:17,960 Speaker 1: perfectly frank, tech firms were very dismissive of regulators. And 99 00:05:18,040 --> 00:05:19,680 Speaker 1: you have a similar issue in the States, right, They 100 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:22,520 Speaker 1: kind of brushed off a lot of regulatory authority and pressure. 101 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:25,880 Speaker 1: We kind of conceptualized that as the central government came 102 00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:28,719 Speaker 1: after big tech. It's not really what happened. You know, 103 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:33,839 Speaker 1: you basically had a multitude of regulators going after, you know, 104 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:37,279 Speaker 1: concerned about a multitude of issues in the tech space. 105 00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:39,920 Speaker 1: So that included things like the Central Bank was worried 106 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:43,920 Speaker 1: that fintech platforms were being regulated like tech companies and 107 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:46,719 Speaker 1: not like banks, but they were basically behaving like banks, 108 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:50,560 Speaker 1: or at least by like financial institutions. Um. You know, 109 00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:55,599 Speaker 1: you you had transport regulators and market regulators concerned about 110 00:05:56,160 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 1: low levels of compliance legal compliance in the right hailing sector. 111 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:04,400 Speaker 1: You had the Ministry of Education concerned that ed tech 112 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:07,840 Speaker 1: companies were you know, overcharging parents and kind of making 113 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 1: it more expensive to have kids in a time when 114 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:13,920 Speaker 1: the population is declining. And so all of these things 115 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:17,200 Speaker 1: have been bubbling under the surface for you know, over 116 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:22,800 Speaker 1: a decade um and then you know, as the state's 117 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:27,280 Speaker 1: priorities and their vision for the future digital economies started 118 00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:31,040 Speaker 1: to solidify under Shijin Ping's government, you know, there was 119 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: this growing concern that the state needed to step in, 120 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 1: that all these regulators needed to step in and put 121 00:06:38,120 --> 00:06:42,640 Speaker 1: these tech companies forced them to get in line with 122 00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:46,240 Speaker 1: state directed goals, and so there was kind of a 123 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:50,280 Speaker 1: green light signal from the central government that these regulators 124 00:06:50,279 --> 00:06:54,600 Speaker 1: could now go after you know, tech companies across this 125 00:06:54,640 --> 00:06:57,719 Speaker 1: whole range of issues, and it just created a tidal 126 00:06:57,760 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 1: wave of kind of pent up regular ship that I'll 127 00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 1: just crash down on tech companies at the same time. Uh, 128 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:07,719 Speaker 1: And that's kind of what investors experienced last year when 129 00:07:07,760 --> 00:07:10,680 Speaker 1: we see in the National Party Congress. Obviously the takeaway 130 00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:13,240 Speaker 1: that I think anyone who paid any attention at all 131 00:07:14,680 --> 00:07:18,960 Speaker 1: had saw the headline, you know, she jumping consolidating his power. 132 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: That's raised question marks about whether policy going forward will 133 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:27,960 Speaker 1: be driven by kind of considerations of what's best for 134 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:30,560 Speaker 1: the economy or much more about what's best for she 135 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:33,760 Speaker 1: and what's best for for the for the government, and 136 00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:37,720 Speaker 1: it's continued control. If when you look at in technology, 137 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 1: it was a key part of China's future growth is 138 00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:44,320 Speaker 1: going to be innovation in that sector. Does one see 139 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 1: the same kind of concern that she's increasingly iron grip 140 00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:55,720 Speaker 1: could start slowing China's innovation or getting in the way 141 00:07:55,760 --> 00:08:00,600 Speaker 1: of its growth. Yes, So the critical issue there is 142 00:08:00,680 --> 00:08:05,080 Speaker 1: really that the state wants to encourage innovation, but innovation 143 00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:09,320 Speaker 1: along the lines of state directed goals. Right, The idea 144 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:12,880 Speaker 1: is really become that tech companies and particularly I'm talking 145 00:08:12,880 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 1: about platform companies here UM, should be on board with 146 00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 1: leveraging their capital and directing their resources towards UH solving 147 00:08:23,240 --> 00:08:28,000 Speaker 1: what the Chinese government tends to call bottleneck or chokehold technologies. Right, 148 00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:32,400 Speaker 1: so the messages listen, tech platforms, we don't want you 149 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 1: guys disrupting pizza delivery or whatever it is you're doing 150 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:38,640 Speaker 1: that's not helping the state. We want you to leverage 151 00:08:38,640 --> 00:08:42,400 Speaker 1: your capital UH to develop high end chips, which were 152 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:46,480 Speaker 1: you know, UM currently struggling to China currently struggling to 153 00:08:46,520 --> 00:08:49,240 Speaker 1: develop that industry. We want you to leverage your capital 154 00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:53,640 Speaker 1: towards AI, towards you know, certain elements of blockchain development UM, 155 00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:56,959 Speaker 1: and those are the goals that the state sees will 156 00:08:57,000 --> 00:08:59,960 Speaker 1: help it develop its digital economy. That I should still 157 00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:02,520 Speaker 1: back a little bit because one of the fascinating pieces 158 00:09:02,520 --> 00:09:04,320 Speaker 1: of the digital economy, the way that the state has 159 00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:06,640 Speaker 1: kind of framed it is that the growth of the 160 00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:11,560 Speaker 1: digital economy in China is you know, many times faster 161 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:16,120 Speaker 1: than the growth is the real economy. But their vision 162 00:09:16,160 --> 00:09:19,800 Speaker 1: for the digital economy doesn't really include or platforms just 163 00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:22,640 Speaker 1: kind of developing whatever they want, right, So that's really 164 00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 1: that's really the issue. They want to put platform companies 165 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,200 Speaker 1: on a trellis and then have them develop on the 166 00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:33,880 Speaker 1: trellis that the party has established. Does that make sense? Yeah? 167 00:09:33,920 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 1: I mean I think a lot of governments would look 168 00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:37,920 Speaker 1: at that and say, yeah, of course, we like to 169 00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:42,480 Speaker 1: have all the innovation or being super valuable useful things, 170 00:09:42,840 --> 00:09:45,800 Speaker 1: and not in these things that seem rather frivolous or 171 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:50,400 Speaker 1: distracting from your knowledge of the way innovators work. I mean, 172 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:53,480 Speaker 1: is how plausible is it that the government is just 173 00:09:53,520 --> 00:09:55,960 Speaker 1: going to be able to encourage innovation in some areas 174 00:09:55,960 --> 00:09:58,079 Speaker 1: and not others. No, I mean, I think that remains 175 00:09:58,120 --> 00:09:59,839 Speaker 1: to be seen. You know, I think about the answer 176 00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 1: to question, I'd be a bazillionaire. But you know, what 177 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:07,440 Speaker 1: we have seen as a response from platform companies indicating 178 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 1: at least nominally that they are trying to get on 179 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:14,160 Speaker 1: the boat. So we've seen platform companies go into chip design. 180 00:10:14,440 --> 00:10:17,760 Speaker 1: We've seen platform companies go into you know AI. We've 181 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:21,319 Speaker 1: seen also seen a lot of moves by platform companies 182 00:10:21,360 --> 00:10:27,160 Speaker 1: to uh create platforms that help solve other domestic problems. 183 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:31,080 Speaker 1: So for example, food security issues or rural revitalization, right 184 00:10:31,120 --> 00:10:34,520 Speaker 1: kind of bringing jobs to the countryside, to to um 185 00:10:34,559 --> 00:10:38,560 Speaker 1: you know, increase wealth in the farming population. So those 186 00:10:38,600 --> 00:10:41,800 Speaker 1: are all state directed priorities. And just to be clear, 187 00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 1: sorry when you say platform companies, what kind of companies? 188 00:10:44,760 --> 00:10:47,319 Speaker 1: And Ali Baba video you know, you know d D 189 00:10:47,840 --> 00:10:50,160 Speaker 1: So you know we've seen a lot of movements from 190 00:10:50,200 --> 00:10:54,800 Speaker 1: those companies too to at least nominally follow that path. 191 00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 1: Whether or not that results in innovation down those passes 192 00:10:58,640 --> 00:11:01,800 Speaker 1: is a question mark. But I you know, I think 193 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:05,440 Speaker 1: it's a little bit silly to say that state direction 194 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:08,880 Speaker 1: has not resulted in innovation in China. UM. You know, 195 00:11:10,600 --> 00:11:15,040 Speaker 1: it has in many cases, and so there's you know, 196 00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:18,160 Speaker 1: there's a there's a possibility that they do succeed. The 197 00:11:18,200 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 1: other thing that you have advantage point on it was 198 00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:25,719 Speaker 1: obviously relevant to this is US China relations and how 199 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:29,000 Speaker 1: that's playing out on the ground. I mean, it feels 200 00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:31,360 Speaker 1: on the outside as if there's an enormous tension at 201 00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:34,839 Speaker 1: the moment between sort of the direction that politicians are 202 00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:39,240 Speaker 1: moving in UM, whether it's what Congress people say about 203 00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:42,880 Speaker 1: Taiwan or even what the administration says about wanting to 204 00:11:42,920 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 1: prevent China from getting cutting edge chips and what businesses 205 00:11:47,480 --> 00:11:52,760 Speaker 1: feel is realistic or desirable in the way of decoupling 206 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:54,679 Speaker 1: from China. You know, I hear it again and again, 207 00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:57,680 Speaker 1: companies saying, well, we hear this. You know, we're thinking about, 208 00:11:57,720 --> 00:11:59,959 Speaker 1: you know, diversifying some of our supply chains, but when 209 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 1: not pulling out of China, and we are, if anything, 210 00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:06,720 Speaker 1: trying to you know, still continue to build our relationships there. 211 00:12:07,679 --> 00:12:09,559 Speaker 1: You're on the ground, or you were until recently, but 212 00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:13,680 Speaker 1: you're still talking to um clients who are asking you 213 00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:17,320 Speaker 1: for the latest in China. Have you seen any let 214 00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:20,960 Speaker 1: up in the number of US or global companies who 215 00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:25,640 Speaker 1: are investing in China and making long term plans for 216 00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:28,360 Speaker 1: business in China. Well, I think you're I think you're 217 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:31,360 Speaker 1: spot on there. Um. What we're really seeing is that 218 00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:33,959 Speaker 1: companies are in a holding pattern. Part of the reason 219 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:36,400 Speaker 1: is US China relations That's half of it. But I 220 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:39,800 Speaker 1: actually think the bigger driver is china zero COVID policies, 221 00:12:40,160 --> 00:12:43,360 Speaker 1: because the zero COVID situation for tech manufacturing is just 222 00:12:43,520 --> 00:12:46,200 Speaker 1: out of control. You know, you have factories that are 223 00:12:46,320 --> 00:12:50,080 Speaker 1: are trying to produce hardware that are just getting caught 224 00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:52,480 Speaker 1: up in lockdowns every two weeks. And you know, I 225 00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:54,360 Speaker 1: don't I don't know if you've been following this, like 226 00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:56,839 Speaker 1: Fox can issue in Jung Joe, there was a COVID 227 00:12:56,840 --> 00:13:00,360 Speaker 1: outbreak at the factory. Factory got locked down and most 228 00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:02,280 Speaker 1: of the workers and we're tracking this right now, most 229 00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:06,760 Speaker 1: of the workers fled. They just went home, right and 230 00:13:06,760 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 1: and and just you know, they walked because no transportation 231 00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:13,080 Speaker 1: would take them because they weren't supposed to be you know, 232 00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:15,800 Speaker 1: on public transport if they were you know, under lockdown. 233 00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 1: People just picked up their bags and said, you know, 234 00:13:18,640 --> 00:13:21,920 Speaker 1: forget this, and they walked back to their hometowns. Right. 235 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:24,800 Speaker 1: I mean, it's just been it's been crazy that kind 236 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 1: of stuff, you know. And then there was issues at 237 00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:29,600 Speaker 1: the you know, Tesla factory and Shanghai. I mean there's 238 00:13:29,640 --> 00:13:33,800 Speaker 1: just been worker protests and so it's really more that 239 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:37,000 Speaker 1: issue that I think is the immediate threat. What we're 240 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:40,120 Speaker 1: hearing is that, you know, the same thing you're hearing 241 00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:43,720 Speaker 1: UM companies are looking to diversify outside of China to 242 00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:48,880 Speaker 1: mitigate risk both zero COVID and US China tension risk. Uh, 243 00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:53,560 Speaker 1: they don't want to leave because there are few options 244 00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:57,000 Speaker 1: and in some cases they literally have no other choice 245 00:13:57,240 --> 00:14:00,200 Speaker 1: because the supply chain in China is so much or 246 00:14:00,240 --> 00:14:05,120 Speaker 1: for certain industries ship building for example, UM, that there's 247 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:07,760 Speaker 1: just nowhere else on on planet Earth they can go, 248 00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:10,080 Speaker 1: you know, continue to do business at the same scale 249 00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:12,600 Speaker 1: and continue to produce at the same scale. So they 250 00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:15,440 Speaker 1: don't want to leave UM and are are concerned about 251 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:18,560 Speaker 1: being driven out, but definitely are trying to hedge hedge 252 00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:20,680 Speaker 1: that risk. But the other thing we're hearing is that 253 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 1: in many cases, you know, a duplicate supply chain would 254 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 1: require ten years to build in the cases of many 255 00:14:28,640 --> 00:14:32,960 Speaker 1: of these companies. So you've just got you know, people 256 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:36,600 Speaker 1: are just doing their best to hedge their bets, but 257 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:39,640 Speaker 1: are largely still dependent on China. I guess finally people 258 00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:42,400 Speaker 1: will be interested to know whether you have any plans 259 00:14:42,400 --> 00:14:43,960 Speaker 1: to go back. I think you'll live it. You're now 260 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:49,320 Speaker 1: living in Portland, UM, which must feel pretty different after 261 00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:52,200 Speaker 1: all those years in Beijing. But you know, if there 262 00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:55,920 Speaker 1: was a m if you were presented with a sort 263 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:59,600 Speaker 1: of compelling reason to to go back to beiging to live, 264 00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 1: would you would you consider that? Or do you think 265 00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:04,640 Speaker 1: or is it becoming a bit more difficult to be 266 00:15:05,560 --> 00:15:10,160 Speaker 1: an American focused on China Chinese tech policy. Oh, I'd 267 00:15:10,200 --> 00:15:13,240 Speaker 1: absolutely go back given half a chance. I mean, I've 268 00:15:13,280 --> 00:15:16,840 Speaker 1: got a big network of friends and obviously our our 269 00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:20,680 Speaker 1: clients and and uh, you know, work friends over in Beijing, 270 00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:23,760 Speaker 1: and and I still, you know, deeply love it there. Um, 271 00:15:23,800 --> 00:15:27,560 Speaker 1: but zero COVID has made it very difficult to remain 272 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:29,360 Speaker 1: right when you can't get in and out of the country, 273 00:15:29,440 --> 00:15:31,120 Speaker 1: especially when you travel as much as I do. It's 274 00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:33,320 Speaker 1: a little bit difficult. So, I mean, my plans are 275 00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:35,200 Speaker 1: just to wait and see what happens with zero COVID. 276 00:15:35,800 --> 00:15:37,800 Speaker 1: As soon as the restrictions start to let up, I'll 277 00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:40,440 Speaker 1: I'll reassess. I've spoken to a number of people who 278 00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:45,160 Speaker 1: do feel more vulnerable as US citizens in China now, 279 00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 1: just not that that that they personally would be under threat, 280 00:15:48,280 --> 00:15:50,880 Speaker 1: but that they could potentially be caught up in something 281 00:15:50,960 --> 00:15:53,600 Speaker 1: larger or a diplomatic spat. But that's not something that 282 00:15:53,640 --> 00:15:57,320 Speaker 1: concerns you particularly well. I Mean, the issue essentially for 283 00:15:57,320 --> 00:15:59,280 Speaker 1: for me is that you know, I like to be 284 00:15:59,400 --> 00:16:01,560 Speaker 1: right in the middle of the action, regardless of any 285 00:16:01,600 --> 00:16:04,280 Speaker 1: of that stuff. Um, it's definitely the tensions on the 286 00:16:04,280 --> 00:16:08,920 Speaker 1: ground have the kind of feeling of being there as 287 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:13,080 Speaker 1: American has definitely changed. It's most certainly changed since I 288 00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:15,360 Speaker 1: got there in two thousand and four, when everyone was 289 00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 1: very excited to, you know, meet an American. And now 290 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:20,160 Speaker 1: you know, they ask you where you're from and you 291 00:16:20,160 --> 00:16:25,000 Speaker 1: say the US and they don't. So but I think 292 00:16:25,040 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 1: that's happening on both sides of the ocean, right, I mean, 293 00:16:27,200 --> 00:16:30,080 Speaker 1: you essentially have a media environment both in the U 294 00:16:30,120 --> 00:16:32,160 Speaker 1: S And China that is kind of painting the other. 295 00:16:32,280 --> 00:16:34,600 Speaker 1: You know, in the US, it's like China's this big, 296 00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:38,640 Speaker 1: evil authoritarian state and the kind of number one adversary 297 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:40,840 Speaker 1: of of the U S. And you know, in China 298 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:43,600 Speaker 1: you're hearing things like, you know, the US is a 299 00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:46,920 Speaker 1: hegemonic power that doesn't want to share with you know, 300 00:16:46,960 --> 00:16:49,880 Speaker 1: anybody else except people that believe as they believe. And 301 00:16:49,920 --> 00:16:52,760 Speaker 1: so there's this kind of you know, downward spiral of 302 00:16:53,080 --> 00:16:59,400 Speaker 1: um communication, misscommunication and you know, negative conversation about the other, 303 00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:02,560 Speaker 1: which is a very unfortunate situation to be in. And 304 00:17:02,600 --> 00:17:04,879 Speaker 1: I have definitely felt that over there. But you know 305 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,240 Speaker 1: that said on a day to day basis, people are people, 306 00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 1: and you know that's true all over the world, Kendra Scheffer, 307 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:18,719 Speaker 1: thank you so much. Thank you. Well, that's it for 308 00:17:18,720 --> 00:17:22,119 Speaker 1: this mini episode of Stephonomics from the New Economy Forum 309 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:25,480 Speaker 1: in Singapore. We will be back with more but in 310 00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:37,800 Speaker 1: the meantime. Thanks to Yang Yang for producing this episode.