WEBVTT - Raghuram Rajan Talks Monetary Policy

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news broad a. Ram Rajhan

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago Boot

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>School of Business and former Reserve Bank of India governor,

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>among several other sense cities had throughout the years. Here

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and let's just get right to it here. No one's

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 1>expecting any change in monetary policy itself out of the

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>dead on Wednesday, but they have to update that dot plot,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>update that summary of economic projections. Do you think they're

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be confident enough to actually say or telegraph

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that rates will come down at some point this year?

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think we would expect dot plots to move

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a little, probably down to two or one cuts this year.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's foud to tell whether it'll be two

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>or one, but it'll come down. And the equally important

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>question is where do they expect interest rates to end

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>up at. Do they sort of push up the long

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>term real rate in a sense, which currently seems to

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>be about point sixty five percent? Do they move that

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>up a little to take into account the sense that

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the long term real rate is going to be higher.

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>And of course, in the middle of all this, Rahram

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 3>is this idea that the US economy has defied expectations,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 3>expectations that it would slow down. It's been remarkably resilient,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 3>and the job market, which is showing signs of cooling,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 3>still continues to add jobs and defy economist estimates. Why

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>is the US economy outperforming everyone's expectations.

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's a bunch of things going on right.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 2>So one of course is we've had a fantastic boost

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to supply from the immigration that's been happening over the

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years post COVID. We've also had in

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 2>a sense some productivity growth, but we've got spectacular balance sheets,

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>both on the household side as well as on the

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>corporate side. And finally, you know, the US had a

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>much larger physical boost then for example, Europe had, So

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>in that sense, all these things are coming together to

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 2>create a stronger economy. So even while Europe has started

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 2>cutting rates because to some extent it hasn't had the

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>same kind of boost in the US, you still find

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>households are confident they are spending. You know, many people,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>anybody who really wants a job has a job at

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>this point and is confidentially spending. So yes, the signs

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of slowing are at the margin, and they are there.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>We've seen, for example, job openings come down, but at

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 2>this point they're not enough for the felt fed to

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 2>feel confident.

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 4>It wants to see either a slowing.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 2>In the economy or a slowing in inflation from current levels,

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's not seeing either.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, I want to get your thoughts here too,

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>not just on what's going on in the US, but

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going on over in India. Obviously you were on

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Central Bank there and we talk about and you've

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously written some great books here, including up Breaking the

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Mold that how India can move forward. We just had

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a really pivotal election, pretty big pivotal decision on monetary policy.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Where is the Indian economy going right now?

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 2>In your perspective, it's actually in a very interesting state.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Because this election was a good one for India. It

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>re established to some extent the move towards a more

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>democratic India, which I think in the long run is good.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 4>But India has some important choices to make.

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Does it follow China to try and become a manufacturing giant?

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>In my personal view, I think that's a mistake because

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the world doesn't have room for another China like manufacturing giant.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>There simply is no place, both in terms of the

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>growing protectionism across the world, but also in terms of sustainability.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>We can't consume so much in terms of manufactured goods.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>But India has another option services, and you're seeing some

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of that happen. Service exports from India are taking off,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 2>and maybe India should focus on that.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, you can all read all about it

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in his book Got to Leave Bit There Garaj Breaking

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the Mold India's untraveled path to prosperity rag Aam Rajan

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>over the University of Chicago