1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:12,039 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:16,680 Speaker 2: The single best idea is to learn the Bloomberg terminal 3 00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:21,120 Speaker 2: with a dollar dynamics of the last twenty four hours. 4 00:00:21,400 --> 00:00:24,520 Speaker 2: I was visualizing in my head way too early in 5 00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:28,120 Speaker 2: the morning a chart of gold back on teen years. 6 00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:30,160 Speaker 2: I want to walk through it. I think it's so important. 7 00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:34,920 Speaker 2: The pros talk about standard deviation. The single best idea 8 00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:38,199 Speaker 2: is to try to understand central limit theorem and the 9 00:00:38,280 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 2: idea of percent change and how you gauge that looking 10 00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:45,479 Speaker 2: at the past data. And one way we do this 11 00:00:45,560 --> 00:00:48,840 Speaker 2: to keep it short is standard deviation. One standard deviation 12 00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:52,480 Speaker 2: is no big deal. Two standard deviations in the realm 13 00:00:52,520 --> 00:00:55,840 Speaker 2: of okay, it's going to happen. And three standard deviations 14 00:00:56,000 --> 00:00:59,880 Speaker 2: as a general statement indicates stress. If you take goal 15 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:06,200 Speaker 2: analgarithmic y axis back twenty years, twenty four years I 16 00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:09,640 Speaker 2: think I did, and you plot it out. We are 17 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:13,000 Speaker 2: at two standard deviations right now with gold at fifty 18 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:18,880 Speaker 2: three hundred, where is three standard deviations? Seven thousand, four 19 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:22,680 Speaker 2: hundred is a quick estimate, not to the dollar, but 20 00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:26,880 Speaker 2: in the vicinity of seven thousand, four hundred is where 21 00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:31,520 Speaker 2: I would suggest the recent two decades of gold indicates 22 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 2: a stress. We talked about the stress today with win Thin. 23 00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:39,520 Speaker 2: He's at the Bank of Nasau, Doctor Thin, iconic out 24 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:42,480 Speaker 2: of Columbia. With all of us work over the years 25 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:46,480 Speaker 2: under Robert Mandel and in the academics of his specific 26 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 2: rim and Burma win Thin on this dollar moment. 27 00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 3: Professor Mindel was a brilliant economist and I think any 28 00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 3: international economist should read his works today. It's still to 29 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:01,080 Speaker 3: me groundbreaking. He introduced whole idea of capital flows before 30 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:01,920 Speaker 3: capa flows. 31 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 2: Actually, is Donald Trump aware of the capitol flow risk 32 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:05,960 Speaker 2: when he says weak dollar? 33 00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:08,680 Speaker 3: Well, right now, they're having this sort of in this 34 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 3: ott sweet spot where they're getting you know, they're getting 35 00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:14,079 Speaker 3: weaker dollar without the spillover into other markets. But you know, 36 00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:16,200 Speaker 3: we've seen time and time again in both development and 37 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:18,720 Speaker 3: immerging markets. You know the times when these moves get 38 00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:20,520 Speaker 3: very disorderly, it's hard to get that genie back in 39 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:20,959 Speaker 3: the bottle. 40 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:23,880 Speaker 2: That really well said. And of course one way to 41 00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:25,840 Speaker 2: look at this is again to go to the Bloomberg 42 00:02:25,919 --> 00:02:29,800 Speaker 2: terminal and I took dollar yen. Dollar yen has come in. 43 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:33,240 Speaker 2: It's a stronger yen. It's basically one sixty two down 44 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:38,560 Speaker 2: to one fifty two fifty three stronger yen fine, where 45 00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:41,960 Speaker 2: does the end become ever stronger? And there's any number 46 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:46,080 Speaker 2: of interpretations of this, but to my quick eyeball in 47 00:02:46,200 --> 00:02:49,320 Speaker 2: math too early in the morning, we have a way 48 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:54,200 Speaker 2: to go to get the real strong yen stress and 49 00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:57,440 Speaker 2: I would vary, I'm just making this real rough. It's 50 00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:00,239 Speaker 2: like ten below from a one to fifty two to 51 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 2: under one strong in week dollar. Basically, we're not there. 52 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:08,600 Speaker 2: And that's the idea of that the genies out of 53 00:03:08,639 --> 00:03:12,840 Speaker 2: the bottle is maybe that where we're heading the genie 54 00:03:12,880 --> 00:03:15,040 Speaker 2: will be rubbed at the FED today. It'll be an 55 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 2: interesting day, to say the least constant hunter of EIU. 56 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:20,040 Speaker 2: On this moment. 57 00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:24,440 Speaker 1: For Jerome, PA, we're seeing elevated goods prices where goods 58 00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 1: prices had been zero to slightly negative for quite some time, 59 00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: because of course we have increased productivity in that sector 60 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 1: of the economy. We obviously have China exporting disinflation or 61 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 1: deflation to the rest of the world by their extraordinary 62 00:03:40,920 --> 00:03:44,800 Speaker 1: supply that they provide, and the tariffs upended that, so 63 00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:48,200 Speaker 1: something that was not contributing to higher inflation was actually 64 00:03:48,200 --> 00:03:52,520 Speaker 1: contributing to lower inflation has gone away constants. 65 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:55,240 Speaker 2: Under there in the separation between services and goods. Of 66 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 2: course we'll do our fed covers a s afternoon we 67 00:03:57,400 --> 00:04:00,680 Speaker 2: leave the Torsten Slock his essay today and pro productivity 68 00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:05,760 Speaker 2: important on podcasts on Apple and Spotify, on YouTube podcasts. 69 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:09,880 Speaker 2: It's single best idea