1 00:00:01,280 --> 00:00:17,120 Speaker 1: The volume. All right, we'll go to hoops tonight. You're 2 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:19,600 Speaker 1: at the volume. Havy Tuesday, everybody hopefull You guys are 3 00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:21,759 Speaker 1: having a great week so far. Just a quick show 4 00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:23,400 Speaker 1: for you guys today. We have a weird week with 5 00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 1: the holiday for obvious reasons, so we have no show 6 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 1: on Wednesday and Thursday this week. But I wanted to 7 00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:30,080 Speaker 1: give you us something for Tuesday, so we're gonna do 8 00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 1: a quick little mail bag based off of the mail 9 00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:35,839 Speaker 1: bag questions that came from last week's mail bag. We 10 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:38,120 Speaker 1: have some follow ups from our Shae Luca debate and 11 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:39,839 Speaker 1: some other questions from around the league. You guys know 12 00:00:39,880 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 1: the Joe before we get started. Subscribe to the Oops 13 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:43,479 Speaker 1: to Night YouTube channel so you don't miss any more 14 00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:45,760 Speaker 1: of our videos. Don't forget to like this video. That 15 00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:47,320 Speaker 1: helps us a lot, And then if you want to 16 00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:49,360 Speaker 1: get questions into our mail bag. Obviously, no mail bag 17 00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:51,760 Speaker 1: this Friday because we'll have our Christmas Day reactions, but 18 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:53,720 Speaker 1: a week from this Friday we'll go back to our 19 00:00:53,760 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: normal Friday mail bags. If you guys want to get 20 00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:57,600 Speaker 1: a question in there, drop them in the YouTube comments 21 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:00,000 Speaker 1: underneath this video and underneath all of our full episode 22 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:02,560 Speaker 1: between now and then right mail bag with a colon. 23 00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:06,360 Speaker 1: Write your question. We'll get to our mailbag questions on Fridays. 24 00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:08,880 Speaker 1: All right, let's talk some basketball. So our first question again, 25 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 1: our first two are going to be related to the 26 00:01:11,319 --> 00:01:13,959 Speaker 1: Shay Luca debate, and then there's another one kind of 27 00:01:14,319 --> 00:01:17,480 Speaker 1: center to around Wemby's comments about the best players in 28 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:21,040 Speaker 1: the world. First question, you're acting as if Shae winning 29 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 1: with this OKC team is equivalent to Luca winning with 30 00:01:26,720 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 1: this Lakers team. Shay is on the best team in 31 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:32,000 Speaker 1: the entire NBA and on pace for perhaps the greatest 32 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:35,520 Speaker 1: team ever. It's not. If Shae wins the title again 33 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:37,839 Speaker 1: and Luca doesn't, then Luca needs to look at himself 34 00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:40,760 Speaker 1: in the mirror. That's such a stupid take. The Lakers 35 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:44,000 Speaker 1: need to get better first. These teams aren't on equal level. 36 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:47,080 Speaker 1: You can't make this an Sga versus Luca thing. This 37 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,800 Speaker 1: was always a gap year for the Lakers. Next season, 38 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 1: Let's see what Luca and Austin do when their team 39 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 1: is built around built more athletic around those two. Okay, 40 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:59,040 Speaker 1: So this is something that I focus on in general 41 00:01:59,040 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 1: when I'm trying to talk about these sorts of things 42 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: like we do our basketball player rankings every summer, based 43 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:09,880 Speaker 1: on an in a vacuum ranking of what I would 44 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:13,519 Speaker 1: expect to be the best player moving forward from the 45 00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:15,639 Speaker 1: beginning of October all the way to the end of 46 00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 1: June right and coming into the season, I did view 47 00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:23,320 Speaker 1: Luca as the better basketball player than Shay for this 48 00:02:23,639 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 1: exact reason. I knew coming into the season that Oklahoma 49 00:02:27,840 --> 00:02:32,520 Speaker 1: City was clearly a better team than the Lakers. I 50 00:02:32,600 --> 00:02:35,680 Speaker 1: knew coming into the season that the Thunder had a 51 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:38,799 Speaker 1: far better chance to win the title this year than 52 00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:42,800 Speaker 1: the Lakers did, And yet I ranked Luca before Shae 53 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 1: because when I looked at the two of them, I 54 00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:48,400 Speaker 1: looked at Luca as a guy based on his twenty 55 00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:51,560 Speaker 1: twenty four season, the year he went to the finals. 56 00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:56,079 Speaker 1: I viewed that as more or less every bit as 57 00:02:56,120 --> 00:02:59,520 Speaker 1: good of a volume score in both efficiency and volume 58 00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:03,480 Speaker 1: as what Shaye did last year, but also a better playmaker. 59 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:05,800 Speaker 1: And so the way I looked at it is like 60 00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:08,080 Speaker 1: the gap between who they were as playmakers. I didn't 61 00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 1: think the defensive end was as much of a factor 62 00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:13,480 Speaker 1: between the two of them. I gave Luca just a 63 00:03:13,639 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 1: tiny bit of an edge over Shay coming into the season. 64 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:21,600 Speaker 1: But two different things have happened. One, Luca has failed 65 00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 1: to reach the level that he reached in twenty twenty four. 66 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 1: He has been nowhere near as efficient, and he's been 67 00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:31,440 Speaker 1: turning the basketball over a lot. Those two particular things 68 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 1: are hurting his efficiency. And then on the other side 69 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:38,680 Speaker 1: you have Shae Yodas Alexander, who took a dramatic leap 70 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:43,720 Speaker 1: inefficiency this year. His true shooting percentage is skyrocketed into 71 00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 1: the high sixties and he's cut his turnovers. So regardless 72 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 1: of what's happening in terms of the teams, regardless of 73 00:03:52,600 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 1: what's happening and like and by the way, if you 74 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 1: want to get into the talent piece, the majority of 75 00:03:56,160 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 1: the data we have to from Shade to this point 76 00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:01,240 Speaker 1: is before Jada joined the team. He's been carrying an 77 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:04,720 Speaker 1: enormous offensive load during this stretch. I do think the 78 00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 1: thunder are better. I think that plays a certain role. 79 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:08,480 Speaker 1: We've talked about it. I've talked about it in my 80 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:10,800 Speaker 1: debates that I've had with the Nerd Sesh guys. I 81 00:04:10,840 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: do think that life is easier for Shay than it 82 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:15,440 Speaker 1: is for Luca in this league. But there is a 83 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:18,080 Speaker 1: gigantic chasm now between the two of them in overall 84 00:04:18,080 --> 00:04:21,040 Speaker 1: efficiency in terms of how many shots they miss, and 85 00:04:21,080 --> 00:04:23,200 Speaker 1: in terms of how often they turned the basketball over. 86 00:04:23,480 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 1: And so what had been a very close race for 87 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:28,320 Speaker 1: me in favor of Luca has now flipped to where 88 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:31,440 Speaker 1: now I have Shane front. I look, I understand that 89 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:33,200 Speaker 1: you guys kind of just got to take my word 90 00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:35,039 Speaker 1: for it, and there will be people that don't believe me, 91 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:37,200 Speaker 1: and it is what it is. But I can promise 92 00:04:37,279 --> 00:04:39,159 Speaker 1: you that when I do talk about these things and 93 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:41,440 Speaker 1: I rank these players, I do my best to look 94 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:43,920 Speaker 1: at them in a vacuum because it is a team 95 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:46,360 Speaker 1: sport and it is harder to win basketball games when 96 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:48,760 Speaker 1: you're surrounded by less talent. And I think that stuff 97 00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:51,560 Speaker 1: is worth talking about. And I think it's too reductive 98 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:53,839 Speaker 1: to just sit there and go, this guy's the best 99 00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:57,680 Speaker 1: because he hoisted the trophy. Shay literally won MVP and 100 00:04:57,839 --> 00:05:00,520 Speaker 1: finals MVP last year, and I ranked him third. I 101 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:04,440 Speaker 1: don't move players up or down based solely on team success. 102 00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:05,960 Speaker 1: I try to view it in the vacuum as best 103 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,479 Speaker 1: as I can. Next kind of counterpoint surrounding that, so 104 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:12,559 Speaker 1: Jason is just straight up ignoring true shooting, we're using 105 00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:16,720 Speaker 1: field goal percentage now, So this is the trick when 106 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:20,320 Speaker 1: you're looking at Luca and you're looking at the Lakers 107 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:22,040 Speaker 1: in general. Actually, so let's just zoom out and let's 108 00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:24,240 Speaker 1: look at the Lakers for a second. So one of 109 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:26,960 Speaker 1: the conversations surrounding the Lakers surrounds their three point shooting 110 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:29,719 Speaker 1: and the fact that they are a relatively low volume 111 00:05:29,760 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 1: three point team and that they don't hit a great percentage. 112 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 1: They actually generate the fewest catch and shoot threes in 113 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:37,240 Speaker 1: the entire league, which is a product of a bunch 114 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:40,240 Speaker 1: of different things. Lebron, Luca, and Austin all take a 115 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 1: lot of shots while guarded. It's kind of the way 116 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:46,600 Speaker 1: their offense is built. And most importantly, this is the 117 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 1: team that generates a lot of free throw temps. So, 118 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:50,960 Speaker 1: for instance, like, what's the whole point of generating threes? 119 00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:54,279 Speaker 1: You generate threes because they're worth an extra point. Right, 120 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:57,560 Speaker 1: So if I hit four threes out of ten shots, 121 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:02,240 Speaker 1: I get twelve points. If I hit five twos out 122 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:05,159 Speaker 1: of ten shots, I only get ten points. So forty 123 00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:08,880 Speaker 1: percent from three is twenty percent more efficient than fifty 124 00:06:08,920 --> 00:06:12,200 Speaker 1: percent from two. Right, So that's the dynamic that drives 125 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:14,919 Speaker 1: the conversation around three point shooting. But if you actually 126 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:18,679 Speaker 1: look at the Lakers as they reflect on the rest 127 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:22,880 Speaker 1: of the league, the Lakers are an extremely high true 128 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:26,240 Speaker 1: shooting percentage team. Their second and true shooting percentage. True 129 00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:31,080 Speaker 1: shooting percentage factors in field goals, three point field goals, 130 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 1: and free throws. It factors all of it in. So 131 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:35,600 Speaker 1: the Lakers in the large sample are actually a very 132 00:06:35,600 --> 00:06:39,359 Speaker 1: efficient offense because they generate so many free throw attempts. However, 133 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:44,120 Speaker 1: Luca is actually more reliant on the free throws than 134 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:47,479 Speaker 1: Shay is when Luca doesn't get to the foul line 135 00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:49,719 Speaker 1: as much in random games, So talk about the Thunder 136 00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:51,760 Speaker 1: game where they did a really good job of not fouling, 137 00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:53,520 Speaker 1: the Phoenix Suns game where they did a really good 138 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:55,840 Speaker 1: job of not foiling. When you are the first Sons game, 139 00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:58,239 Speaker 1: the one that they lost before the inn season tournament, 140 00:06:58,600 --> 00:07:00,600 Speaker 1: when you kind of like zoom in on that dynamic, 141 00:07:00,880 --> 00:07:03,880 Speaker 1: you go, oh, when it actually comes down to putting 142 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:07,920 Speaker 1: the ball in the basket, Shay is better than Luca. 143 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 1: He's more efficient from three, he's more efficient from two. 144 00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 1: Luca's been really good on short range twos, he's been 145 00:07:13,080 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: like right around fifty percent this year. Well, Shay's been 146 00:07:16,760 --> 00:07:20,560 Speaker 1: fifty eight fifty nine percent on short range twos. That's 147 00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:23,760 Speaker 1: more efficient. Shay has been more efficient from three. That 148 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:27,600 Speaker 1: means there's fewer miss shots. Fewer miss shots and fewer 149 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,360 Speaker 1: turnovers means fewer opportunities for the opponent to attack you 150 00:07:31,400 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 1: in transition. So, like I think true shooting percentage is 151 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: a valuable way to look at large sample efficiency, and 152 00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:41,640 Speaker 1: I do think that it's worth bringing up. But when 153 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:44,600 Speaker 1: you come into live ball play and things that are 154 00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:46,840 Speaker 1: outside of your control, like the whistle, tend to go 155 00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:49,560 Speaker 1: another direction. And by the way, Shaye foulgriffs a lot too. 156 00:07:49,560 --> 00:07:52,400 Speaker 1: I'd argue Luca and Shae are two of the most 157 00:07:52,840 --> 00:07:55,040 Speaker 1: the two of the biggest culprits in the league. But 158 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 1: just look at the volume, guys. Luca is relying on 159 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:00,160 Speaker 1: getting to the foul line considerably more than Shaye is 160 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 1: at this point. And so when you look at the 161 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:05,120 Speaker 1: amount of missed shots between the two of them and 162 00:08:05,160 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 1: the amount of turnovers between the two of them, Luca's 163 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 1: just having these Like Carson from nerd Set, I thought 164 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:12,920 Speaker 1: put this really well. He said, Luca fails more. That's 165 00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:14,600 Speaker 1: the way he put it. That's the way I'd put 166 00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:16,960 Speaker 1: it too. I'd agree with him in that characterization, Like 167 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 1: when you fail on offense, it can trigger the opponent's offense. 168 00:08:22,320 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 1: That's why that efficiency is worth bringing up. And it's 169 00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:27,200 Speaker 1: not as just it's not as just simple as just 170 00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:31,120 Speaker 1: looking at true shooting percentage. You can have another way 171 00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:33,080 Speaker 1: of looking at it is you can have a high 172 00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:37,640 Speaker 1: true shooting percentage but have more opportunities for the opponent 173 00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:39,520 Speaker 1: to get out in transition because you're taking a lot 174 00:08:39,520 --> 00:08:41,320 Speaker 1: of threes and you're getting to the foul line a lot. 175 00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 1: Because every miss three, even though in the large sample 176 00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:46,880 Speaker 1: it's worth more points, every miss three is a long 177 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:49,839 Speaker 1: rebound that can trigger a transition opportunity. And every time 178 00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:52,000 Speaker 1: Luca goes down the lane line and tries to grift 179 00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 1: and fails and doesn't get the call and then stands 180 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:57,280 Speaker 1: there complaining with the ref while they're running the other way, 181 00:08:57,320 --> 00:08:59,760 Speaker 1: that can trigger opportunities for the opponent. And last thing, 182 00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:02,840 Speaker 1: this last thing I'll say about it, like I am 183 00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:05,360 Speaker 1: emotionally invested in Luca being good. I root for his team. 184 00:09:05,720 --> 00:09:08,600 Speaker 1: I am not the kind of stand like you've seen 185 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:10,720 Speaker 1: in some of these some of the behavior where like 186 00:09:10,760 --> 00:09:11,920 Speaker 1: some of the you've seen some of it with the 187 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:15,600 Speaker 1: Luca and Lebron stands lately, where I'm not like I 188 00:09:15,679 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 1: want Luca to be great. I think it's Luca's team. 189 00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:21,760 Speaker 1: I have no interest in Lebron doing more statistically or 190 00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:25,040 Speaker 1: Luca doing more statistically. I'm only interested in the Lakers 191 00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:27,600 Speaker 1: winning basketball games. That's all I care about. And like 192 00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:31,320 Speaker 1: my perspective in the way I've discussed Luca is not 193 00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:34,440 Speaker 1: centered around whether or not he's great. We all know 194 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:38,839 Speaker 1: lucas great. Luca's been less great than I've expected him 195 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:41,440 Speaker 1: to be this year, but he's still been great. It's 196 00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:44,760 Speaker 1: just now we're talking about splitting hairs between the very 197 00:09:44,760 --> 00:09:47,959 Speaker 1: best players in the world, comparing him to Shay, comparing 198 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 1: him to be honest, comparing him to Jokic. That becomes 199 00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:53,400 Speaker 1: much more of a nitpicky conversation. So we're gonna get 200 00:09:53,480 --> 00:09:55,679 Speaker 1: nitpicky when we get into those parts of the conversation. 201 00:09:57,360 --> 00:09:59,079 Speaker 1: I want to know where I bet on basketball during 202 00:09:59,080 --> 00:10:01,880 Speaker 1: the holiday season. It's hard rock bet, not just because 203 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:03,800 Speaker 1: it's the presenting sponsor of our show, but because they 204 00:10:03,800 --> 00:10:06,120 Speaker 1: make it easy to bet before tip off and in 205 00:10:06,160 --> 00:10:09,200 Speaker 1: the middle of the action. With just a few simple taps, 206 00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:11,280 Speaker 1: I open the app, I find a bet I like, 207 00:10:11,600 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 1: and then bam, my bet is placed, just in time 208 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:15,640 Speaker 1: for me to get back to wrapping presence and enjoying 209 00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:18,280 Speaker 1: my favorite Christmas movie. Sign up today and bet five 210 00:10:18,320 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 1: dollars on any game than if it wins. You also 211 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:23,960 Speaker 1: score one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets a 212 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 1: dub plus an extra one to fifty to bet with. 213 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 1: Now that's spreading holiday cheer. Plus. Hard Rock Bet fills 214 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,880 Speaker 1: your stockings with new promos daily, so whenever you're listening, 215 00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:35,480 Speaker 1: just open the app and check out what you've got 216 00:10:35,480 --> 00:10:37,800 Speaker 1: any day of the week. Download the hard Rock Bet 217 00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 1: app and make your first deposit today. Payable and bonus 218 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 1: bets not a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe 219 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:48,160 Speaker 1: of Florida in Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC. 220 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:50,160 Speaker 1: In all other states. Must be twenty to one plus 221 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:53,800 Speaker 1: and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, 222 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:56,920 Speaker 1: New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and 223 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:59,800 Speaker 1: conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida. Call one eight 224 00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:02,959 Speaker 1: three three play wise. In Indiana. If you or someone 225 00:11:02,960 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 1: else you know has a gambling problem and wants help, 226 00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:09,040 Speaker 1: call one eight hundred and nine with it gambling problem 227 00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:12,000 Speaker 1: called one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, 228 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:18,360 Speaker 1: New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia. Jason, I was wondering 229 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:20,079 Speaker 1: if you could share your take on how to evaluate 230 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:23,040 Speaker 1: two way players. A few days ago, Wemby said Jokich 231 00:11:23,080 --> 00:11:24,760 Speaker 1: is the best offensive player in the world, but not 232 00:11:24,800 --> 00:11:26,880 Speaker 1: the best defensive player in the world. He said, the 233 00:11:26,880 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 1: best player in the world is himself, Giannis or Sga. 234 00:11:29,480 --> 00:11:31,920 Speaker 1: I think he, along with many NBA fans, don't understand 235 00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:34,520 Speaker 1: that elite offense is more important and more valuable than 236 00:11:34,559 --> 00:11:37,280 Speaker 1: elite defense. Is Yokich an elite defender. No, but his 237 00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 1: overall positive impact is still vastly superior to Wemby's and 238 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:44,000 Speaker 1: clearly superior to Giannis's and Shay's. What are your thoughts 239 00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:47,160 Speaker 1: on this and how we should correctly or accurately evaluate 240 00:11:47,160 --> 00:11:50,240 Speaker 1: two way players versus a one way offensive goat like Jokic. 241 00:11:51,559 --> 00:11:53,200 Speaker 1: I think you broke it down really well yourself, and 242 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:56,080 Speaker 1: I want to give you some credit there. Like the 243 00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:59,080 Speaker 1: way I look at it, your value to your basketball 244 00:11:59,080 --> 00:12:02,800 Speaker 1: team is unique to what your team needs for you, right, 245 00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:05,680 Speaker 1: and so yeah, Like, if you are the type of 246 00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:10,200 Speaker 1: weak defender that can be really difficult to build an 247 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:15,480 Speaker 1: elite defense around, that's problematic. But even if you are 248 00:12:15,520 --> 00:12:19,000 Speaker 1: a below average defender, if you can at least do 249 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:22,000 Speaker 1: some things well enough to where they can build a 250 00:12:22,120 --> 00:12:27,240 Speaker 1: functioning elite defense around you, then your offensive gifts become 251 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:30,360 Speaker 1: dramatically more valuable than a guy who's an elite defensive 252 00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 1: player but that cannot impact the game at the offensive level. 253 00:12:33,640 --> 00:12:38,720 Speaker 1: The reason why is because you can schematically, through good 254 00:12:38,760 --> 00:12:43,040 Speaker 1: game planning, through mixing up coverages, through attention to detail, 255 00:12:43,440 --> 00:12:48,080 Speaker 1: through habits and consistency, through having good supporting role player talent, 256 00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 1: you can build an elite defense without needing an elite 257 00:12:53,040 --> 00:12:58,480 Speaker 1: defensive superstar. It is very difficult to be an elite 258 00:12:58,520 --> 00:13:03,400 Speaker 1: offense without an elite offensive superstar. I'd argue it's impossible. 259 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 1: You need fundamentally a player that can break the defense 260 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:11,800 Speaker 1: over and over again and create the types of advantages 261 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:14,599 Speaker 1: that will drive success consistently on the offensive end of 262 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:16,960 Speaker 1: the floor. So where I disagree with Wenby is like, 263 00:13:18,360 --> 00:13:22,320 Speaker 1: give me Jokic and and a good decent group of 264 00:13:22,320 --> 00:13:26,040 Speaker 1: defenders around him, versus Wemby and a good group of 265 00:13:26,160 --> 00:13:29,000 Speaker 1: a decent kind of league average offensive players around him. 266 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:32,319 Speaker 1: I think Jokic is going to be able to break 267 00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:37,160 Speaker 1: san Antonio's defense with his supreme offensive gifts and be 268 00:13:37,280 --> 00:13:39,960 Speaker 1: good enough defensively with the talent he as around him, 269 00:13:40,480 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: rather than if you look at san Antonio on that example, 270 00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:46,520 Speaker 1: it doesn't matter if the four other offensive players around 271 00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:50,200 Speaker 1: him are all solid if Wemby can't break the defense 272 00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:52,640 Speaker 1: down to the extent that a guy like Jokic can. 273 00:13:52,760 --> 00:13:54,880 Speaker 1: And that's kind of like what the way that I've 274 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:58,720 Speaker 1: always looked at it. It's just it's it's easier to 275 00:13:58,880 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 1: build a good defense around a offensive minded superstar than 276 00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:06,480 Speaker 1: to build a great offense around a defensive minded superstar. 277 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 1: I've dealt with this personally since Lebron aged out, And 278 00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:12,200 Speaker 1: you know, Lebron's always been good in his old age, 279 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:16,400 Speaker 1: but he's not been a defense breaking offensive engine, not 280 00:14:16,520 --> 00:14:19,960 Speaker 1: since he was not since like twenty twenty one. Really ever, 281 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:22,800 Speaker 1: since Solomon Hill dove into his ankle, we've only seen 282 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:26,080 Speaker 1: very brief spurts where Lebron's actually been that type of 283 00:14:26,160 --> 00:14:30,440 Speaker 1: legit awesome offensive engine, like very briefly last year surrounding 284 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:33,040 Speaker 1: the trade deadline for like a month, right, but it's 285 00:14:33,080 --> 00:14:36,480 Speaker 1: been rare, and so before then it was fine with Ad. 286 00:14:36,680 --> 00:14:39,240 Speaker 1: But then all of a sudden, like Ad could be this. 287 00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:41,080 Speaker 1: I thought he was the best defensive player in the 288 00:14:41,080 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 1: world before Wemby came around, but it didn't matter because 289 00:14:44,960 --> 00:14:48,120 Speaker 1: they weren't good enough offensively because Ad and Lebron at 290 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:53,120 Speaker 1: his old age were unable to break defenses down the 291 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:56,000 Speaker 1: way that they needed to in order to capitalize. So, 292 00:14:56,120 --> 00:14:58,600 Speaker 1: like another really simple way to look at it is 293 00:14:58,640 --> 00:15:02,360 Speaker 1: like the twenty twenty three Denver Nuggets were an elite 294 00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:07,760 Speaker 1: defense in the postseason despite having Yokichen Murray the twenty 295 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:10,120 Speaker 1: twenty four MAVs now they ended up running into an 296 00:15:10,160 --> 00:15:12,480 Speaker 1: awful matchup for them, a Boston Celtics team that could 297 00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:15,240 Speaker 1: truly spread them out and really target Luca's point of 298 00:15:15,280 --> 00:15:17,760 Speaker 1: attack defense at a higher level. But like we saw 299 00:15:17,800 --> 00:15:19,960 Speaker 1: other matchups like the Clippers series in the first round 300 00:15:19,960 --> 00:15:23,400 Speaker 1: of that year, where Luca's defense was fine because they 301 00:15:23,480 --> 00:15:26,080 Speaker 1: didn't have five elite shooters, on the floor and so 302 00:15:26,080 --> 00:15:28,120 Speaker 1: they were able to offer the help when they needed 303 00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:30,120 Speaker 1: to help. Like that was a unique kind of matchup 304 00:15:30,200 --> 00:15:34,320 Speaker 1: problem regarding a Celtics team that had five good shooters 305 00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 1: on the floor at all times, which is not something 306 00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:38,080 Speaker 1: we really see in the NBA anymore, right, Like that 307 00:15:38,120 --> 00:15:39,600 Speaker 1: was kind of like a unique kind of flash in 308 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:42,960 Speaker 1: a pan kind of thing. Dallas constructed a good defense 309 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 1: through that entire season post trade because they had good 310 00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:50,320 Speaker 1: defenders around Luca, and then they had this supremely gifted 311 00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:52,240 Speaker 1: offensive player that can push them over the top. So 312 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:54,640 Speaker 1: like that's why I've always get been geared that way. 313 00:15:54,680 --> 00:15:58,600 Speaker 1: I just generally think a defense breaking offensive weapon is 314 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:01,080 Speaker 1: the hardest thing to come by in the NBA and 315 00:16:01,360 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 1: kind of like a fundamental need if you want to 316 00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:07,320 Speaker 1: win a championship, unless you have a supreme talent advantage, 317 00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 1: like you have five thirty million dollars players like the 318 00:16:09,720 --> 00:16:12,600 Speaker 1: Boston Celtics, right, or you have Oklahoma City last year. 319 00:16:12,920 --> 00:16:15,320 Speaker 1: Like I think Shay is a considerably better offensive player 320 00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:17,120 Speaker 1: this year than he was last year in terms of 321 00:16:17,160 --> 00:16:19,960 Speaker 1: just game flow, late game stuff, over the top shooting, 322 00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:21,640 Speaker 1: like from the three point line. He's even more efficient 323 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,280 Speaker 1: from short range twos. Right, But the reason why they 324 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:26,200 Speaker 1: won the championship last year is they had this all 325 00:16:26,240 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 1: time great defense, right, Like that was a unique trait. 326 00:16:29,680 --> 00:16:32,840 Speaker 1: It wasn't any one defensive breaking weapon. It was just 327 00:16:32,880 --> 00:16:36,160 Speaker 1: a bunch of really good defenders working together. Right. I 328 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:40,960 Speaker 1: just generally think that that off, that defense breaking offensive 329 00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 1: engine is the hardest weapon to come by in the NBA. 330 00:16:44,680 --> 00:16:47,080 Speaker 1: Who do you think shoulder is the most responsibility for 331 00:16:47,120 --> 00:16:50,160 Speaker 1: the warriors disappointing season, the players, the coach, or the 332 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:52,840 Speaker 1: front office. Who do you think shoulders the most responsibility 333 00:16:52,880 --> 00:16:55,160 Speaker 1: for the disappointing results of the years since the Warriors 334 00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:57,680 Speaker 1: last title in twenty twenty two. Seems to me there's 335 00:16:57,720 --> 00:16:59,800 Speaker 1: plenty of blame to go around except for Steph at 336 00:16:59,800 --> 00:17:02,960 Speaker 1: this point. Thanks, love the show as always. I agree 337 00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:06,119 Speaker 1: with you fully, Like there are certain guys like I 338 00:17:06,119 --> 00:17:10,800 Speaker 1: think Moses Moody generally has reached his potential and has 339 00:17:10,840 --> 00:17:13,240 Speaker 1: become a player that you know, based on where he 340 00:17:13,280 --> 00:17:17,440 Speaker 1: got picked, has exceeded expectations. But when you look down 341 00:17:17,480 --> 00:17:20,240 Speaker 1: the rest of the list, like I'd argue you talk 342 00:17:20,280 --> 00:17:23,960 Speaker 1: about the since twenty twenty two, I'd include this into 343 00:17:23,960 --> 00:17:26,639 Speaker 1: this season because of what they did last summer. The 344 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,760 Speaker 1: ownership group and their unwillingness to let go of Jonathan 345 00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:32,399 Speaker 1: Minga and the fact that he was clearly a bust 346 00:17:32,600 --> 00:17:35,800 Speaker 1: relative to where they picked him has set this franchise 347 00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:39,360 Speaker 1: back because they had an opportunity to trade him two 348 00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:42,720 Speaker 1: years ago for a guy like a Pascal Siakamerno g 349 00:17:42,840 --> 00:17:45,280 Speaker 1: and Obi, and they refused. That was when he was 350 00:17:45,320 --> 00:17:48,560 Speaker 1: at his peak value. Now he's nowhere near of worth 351 00:17:48,600 --> 00:17:50,359 Speaker 1: that much. But at the very least they could have 352 00:17:50,359 --> 00:17:53,119 Speaker 1: turned him into Malik Monk this last summer, and everyone 353 00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:55,000 Speaker 1: was like, no, you can't include Buddy Heald. How much 354 00:17:55,040 --> 00:17:57,679 Speaker 1: do you guys leaning on Buddy Heiald right now? How 355 00:17:57,760 --> 00:18:00,680 Speaker 1: much is Buddy yield vital to your succes right now? 356 00:18:01,520 --> 00:18:04,240 Speaker 1: You guys could have used a guard who could break 357 00:18:04,280 --> 00:18:06,639 Speaker 1: the defense down off the dribble, beat people off the dribble, 358 00:18:06,840 --> 00:18:09,040 Speaker 1: and generate quality shots when Steph was off the floor. 359 00:18:09,280 --> 00:18:12,200 Speaker 1: Still this year one nineteen offensive rating when Steph is 360 00:18:12,240 --> 00:18:14,399 Speaker 1: on the floor, according to Cleaning the Glass, they can 361 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:16,800 Speaker 1: score when STEP's out there, they just can't score when 362 00:18:16,800 --> 00:18:19,399 Speaker 1: he's off. Now it gets a little deeper because the 363 00:18:19,400 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 1: defense hasn't been as good we'll talk about that in 364 00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:22,960 Speaker 1: a second, but I think that the front office and 365 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:25,520 Speaker 1: ownership grip, mainly the ownership group deserves the majority of 366 00:18:25,560 --> 00:18:28,320 Speaker 1: the blame for the circumstance because they were unwilling to 367 00:18:28,359 --> 00:18:31,399 Speaker 1: admit that they busted on Cominga and they needed to 368 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:33,560 Speaker 1: move him earlier on in the deal, and so as 369 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:36,000 Speaker 1: a result, now they've got him in this weird, distressed 370 00:18:36,040 --> 00:18:38,520 Speaker 1: asset situation where his value is probably lower than it's 371 00:18:38,520 --> 00:18:43,119 Speaker 1: ever been, and that's just kind of the predicament that 372 00:18:43,160 --> 00:18:46,639 Speaker 1: they're in. I wouldn't say it's quite as low as 373 00:18:46,640 --> 00:18:48,919 Speaker 1: it was last summer because now he's no longer a 374 00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:53,120 Speaker 1: restricted free agent and so he's technically an expiring salary too. 375 00:18:53,119 --> 00:18:55,639 Speaker 1: There's a couple other elements to it, but like to me, 376 00:18:55,920 --> 00:18:58,760 Speaker 1: Johnathan Kaminga should have been traded two years ago and 377 00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:01,560 Speaker 1: then should have been traded this and just every opportunity 378 00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:03,280 Speaker 1: that the Warriors have had to do so, they've just 379 00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:05,760 Speaker 1: not done it, and so they haven't been able to 380 00:19:05,760 --> 00:19:08,200 Speaker 1: flip him into a piece that they can actually use 381 00:19:08,600 --> 00:19:11,680 Speaker 1: when they're trying to win basketball games down the line. 382 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:15,040 Speaker 1: It gets tough, right, Jimmy Butler, although he's been better 383 00:19:15,040 --> 00:19:18,640 Speaker 1: as of late, hasn't been good enough this season compared 384 00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:20,680 Speaker 1: to the type of salary that he's getting paid. Right, 385 00:19:21,040 --> 00:19:24,000 Speaker 1: Draymond Green hasn't been nearly as good defensively as he's 386 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:26,600 Speaker 1: been in years pass. I think he's been a considerable 387 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:28,960 Speaker 1: drop off there that has affected the team on the 388 00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:31,000 Speaker 1: defensive end of the four. That's why they aren't dominating 389 00:19:31,080 --> 00:19:33,919 Speaker 1: Steph's minutes like they have in year's past. And so 390 00:19:34,080 --> 00:19:35,520 Speaker 1: I think it goes down the line, like some of 391 00:19:35,520 --> 00:19:37,880 Speaker 1: the old guys are starting to age out. Jimmy wasn't 392 00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:39,440 Speaker 1: as good as he needed to be to start the year. 393 00:19:39,880 --> 00:19:41,440 Speaker 1: I think the schedule played a role too. They just 394 00:19:41,480 --> 00:19:43,479 Speaker 1: got ran into the ground. Like there's this weird thing 395 00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:44,959 Speaker 1: that happens in the NBA where if you get off 396 00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:47,199 Speaker 1: to a great start, you can easily handle like a 397 00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:49,600 Speaker 1: three to eight stretch, But if you start the season 398 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:51,760 Speaker 1: and you have a three to eight stretch early in 399 00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:54,359 Speaker 1: the season, it can be like devastating to your entire 400 00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:56,919 Speaker 1: kind of vibe in the locker room. Right, And I 401 00:19:56,920 --> 00:19:58,720 Speaker 1: think the Warriors kind of dealt with a front loaded 402 00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:00,879 Speaker 1: schedule that kind of beat him into the But you 403 00:20:00,960 --> 00:20:03,600 Speaker 1: might have had a better chance of surviving that if 404 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:06,880 Speaker 1: you flip Jonathan Minga before the season for a Malik Monk, 405 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:09,360 Speaker 1: that helps you on offense, if you have a better 406 00:20:09,400 --> 00:20:11,520 Speaker 1: start to the season from guys like Jimmy and Draymond, Like, 407 00:20:11,560 --> 00:20:13,040 Speaker 1: I think there was a version of this story that 408 00:20:13,040 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 1: could have ended better than it actually did. Do you 409 00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:19,840 Speaker 1: think the Lakers would be worse if they traded Reeves 410 00:20:19,840 --> 00:20:23,560 Speaker 1: for men Thompson and Reed Shepherd. I know you said 411 00:20:23,600 --> 00:20:25,880 Speaker 1: you wouldn't consider trading Reeves unless you're a sure number 412 00:20:25,880 --> 00:20:27,520 Speaker 1: two next to Luka, just a better player, But I 413 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:28,960 Speaker 1: don't know. The more I watch read, I feel like 414 00:20:29,000 --> 00:20:30,960 Speaker 1: he can eventually be something close to that at least. 415 00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:33,560 Speaker 1: So here's the thing. This is my I was wrong 416 00:20:33,560 --> 00:20:35,760 Speaker 1: about Reed Shepherd in the early part of the season. 417 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:39,280 Speaker 1: Early in the season, I viewed him as like completely 418 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 1: overmatched when he was on the floor. I didn't think 419 00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:44,159 Speaker 1: he shot the ball well enough for the types of 420 00:20:44,160 --> 00:20:45,720 Speaker 1: looks that he was getting. I didn't like his on 421 00:20:45,840 --> 00:20:48,719 Speaker 1: ball reps, and I thought he was a bad defensive player. 422 00:20:49,720 --> 00:20:51,920 Speaker 1: We've seen a much larger sample now and like, the 423 00:20:52,520 --> 00:20:54,879 Speaker 1: shooting is legitimately awesome. And this is where I got 424 00:20:54,920 --> 00:20:56,840 Speaker 1: a credit. Samvasini This is why I trust Sam so much. 425 00:20:56,880 --> 00:20:58,399 Speaker 1: Sam is like a guy, and whenever I have like 426 00:20:58,440 --> 00:21:00,360 Speaker 1: an opinion on a young player, I was like text 427 00:21:00,400 --> 00:21:02,400 Speaker 1: Sam and I'm like, hey, dude, what do you think? 428 00:21:02,640 --> 00:21:06,199 Speaker 1: And I like texted Sam early this season and I 429 00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:07,960 Speaker 1: was like, dude, I just don't see it with Reed, 430 00:21:08,119 --> 00:21:10,080 Speaker 1: Like what's the deal? Like I don't understand what all 431 00:21:10,080 --> 00:21:12,800 Speaker 1: the buzz is about. And to Sam's credit, the one 432 00:21:12,800 --> 00:21:15,280 Speaker 1: thing he kept hammering was like the dude can shoot, 433 00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:18,040 Speaker 1: Like he can like really shoot it. So like he's 434 00:21:18,080 --> 00:21:20,320 Speaker 1: gonna start making shots and that will help this team. 435 00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:23,440 Speaker 1: And Reid has taken a significant leap in that department 436 00:21:23,480 --> 00:21:26,040 Speaker 1: to where he's knocking down shots not just on the catch, 437 00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:27,960 Speaker 1: but off the dribble at a really high rate. He's 438 00:21:27,960 --> 00:21:30,640 Speaker 1: like twenty one for fifty one this season on off 439 00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:33,480 Speaker 1: the dribble threes. That's gonna be a huge boost to 440 00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:35,600 Speaker 1: an offense. And it's been. It was like basically how 441 00:21:35,640 --> 00:21:38,960 Speaker 1: they beat Denver on Saturday last week, right, So like 442 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:44,600 Speaker 1: that part has popped. However, there is a gigantic chasm 443 00:21:44,600 --> 00:21:48,320 Speaker 1: between Austin Reeves and Reed Shepherd defensively, like Austin Reeves 444 00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:52,880 Speaker 1: is bigger considerably and stronger considerably, so like even though 445 00:21:52,920 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 1: he can get targeted sometimes, And I think you got 446 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:56,960 Speaker 1: to have like a more nuanced conversation when it comes 447 00:21:57,000 --> 00:22:01,160 Speaker 1: to guards, because there are unless you're a professional defender 448 00:22:01,640 --> 00:22:03,919 Speaker 1: or you're like I mean, even Anthony Edwards, who's an 449 00:22:03,960 --> 00:22:08,280 Speaker 1: apex athlete, struggles sometimes in off ball defense and attentiveness 450 00:22:08,320 --> 00:22:10,399 Speaker 1: and can struggle to navigate screens because he has so 451 00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:12,840 Speaker 1: much attention and energy being devoted to the offensive end 452 00:22:12,880 --> 00:22:15,760 Speaker 1: of the floor. Right, Like, outside of role player guards 453 00:22:15,760 --> 00:22:19,160 Speaker 1: that specialize in defense, almost every team has a guard 454 00:22:19,200 --> 00:22:21,679 Speaker 1: that's going to get attacked in action. So like everyone 455 00:22:21,760 --> 00:22:23,480 Speaker 1: always is like, oh my god, look at Austin. He's 456 00:22:23,480 --> 00:22:25,760 Speaker 1: getting picked on. It's like Steph Curry gets fucking picked on. 457 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:29,080 Speaker 1: Like literally everyone's targeting shake Yios with Alexander on the 458 00:22:29,080 --> 00:22:31,200 Speaker 1: Thunder in action as much as they can. Like if 459 00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:32,920 Speaker 1: there is a skill guard on the other team, you're 460 00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:34,760 Speaker 1: trying to attack them in action. That's how it goes. 461 00:22:35,320 --> 00:22:38,600 Speaker 1: And there's a big difference between like this guy's getting 462 00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:42,920 Speaker 1: targeted and this guy literally can't defend, and like Reid 463 00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:46,919 Speaker 1: was getting mercilessly picked on by the Kings down the 464 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:49,639 Speaker 1: stretch of that game, Demarta Rozen was targeting him, Dennis 465 00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:53,680 Speaker 1: Schroeder's targeting him, and he looked completely physically overmatched because 466 00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:55,879 Speaker 1: he's so small. And so I really like Reid and 467 00:22:55,920 --> 00:22:58,200 Speaker 1: I think he projects well to be like a good 468 00:22:58,280 --> 00:23:00,560 Speaker 1: sixth man in this league in the short term. Maybe 469 00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:02,800 Speaker 1: in the long run he improves enough defensively by putting 470 00:23:02,800 --> 00:23:05,240 Speaker 1: on some muscle and just becoming more scrappy and physical 471 00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:07,760 Speaker 1: to become a player that can become a dead serious, 472 00:23:07,880 --> 00:23:12,159 Speaker 1: like top five guy on a championship level team, like 473 00:23:12,200 --> 00:23:14,960 Speaker 1: a legit starting five, closing five kind of guy. But 474 00:23:15,359 --> 00:23:17,560 Speaker 1: right now I view him as a guy that is 475 00:23:17,600 --> 00:23:20,320 Speaker 1: not up to the task just because of his physical limitation. 476 00:23:20,520 --> 00:23:23,800 Speaker 1: So like to me, like, I don't think Reid is 477 00:23:23,840 --> 00:23:25,679 Speaker 1: on track to become like a guy who could be 478 00:23:25,680 --> 00:23:28,919 Speaker 1: a number two for Luca on this timeline. Maybe a 479 00:23:28,920 --> 00:23:31,280 Speaker 1: different young star guard at some point in the future, 480 00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:33,199 Speaker 1: but I don't. I think he's two years away from 481 00:23:33,240 --> 00:23:35,600 Speaker 1: being two years away, so to speak, from being like 482 00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:38,679 Speaker 1: good enough defensively to be able to hold up in 483 00:23:38,800 --> 00:23:44,520 Speaker 1: some high leverage lineups in big spots. All right, last question, 484 00:23:45,400 --> 00:23:47,399 Speaker 1: how can Jannison Wenby be on this list? This is 485 00:23:47,440 --> 00:23:50,040 Speaker 1: regarding our top ten list with as much time as 486 00:23:50,080 --> 00:23:52,520 Speaker 1: they have missed. I'm a Knicks fan, but where's Jalen Brown, 487 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:55,359 Speaker 1: Where's jim Al Murray's having it insane year? Where's Austin Reeves? 488 00:23:55,600 --> 00:23:57,520 Speaker 1: So this was in reference to my top ten list, 489 00:23:57,560 --> 00:23:59,199 Speaker 1: and again like that was not like a who I 490 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:01,160 Speaker 1: think is the tenth best? Who are the ten best 491 00:24:01,160 --> 00:24:03,480 Speaker 1: players in the world, Like, for instance, I had Anthy 492 00:24:03,760 --> 00:24:06,400 Speaker 1: Edwards at ten on that list. I had him at 493 00:24:06,440 --> 00:24:10,280 Speaker 1: five before the season. If you ask me where ranks 494 00:24:10,280 --> 00:24:12,159 Speaker 1: in the league, I'm still ranking him five right now. 495 00:24:12,200 --> 00:24:15,239 Speaker 1: I'm not about to change my mind based on, you know, 496 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:18,440 Speaker 1: a couple of months of basketball, of regular season basketball. 497 00:24:18,480 --> 00:24:22,679 Speaker 1: Mind you, that list was strictly meant to indicate who's 498 00:24:22,760 --> 00:24:26,920 Speaker 1: had the ten best seasons so far. And again you're 499 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:29,440 Speaker 1: splitting hairs, like how are you going to bump a 500 00:24:29,480 --> 00:24:32,560 Speaker 1: guy like Jalen Brunson off that list? Like Tyrese Max, 501 00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:36,560 Speaker 1: He's been freaking awesome. Anthony Edwards just like one ahead 502 00:24:36,560 --> 00:24:38,960 Speaker 1: to head against Shay, Like the guys on that list 503 00:24:39,000 --> 00:24:40,960 Speaker 1: were all really good. So I said this in the show, 504 00:24:41,240 --> 00:24:43,000 Speaker 1: but I mean it, like that list is longer. There's 505 00:24:43,040 --> 00:24:45,439 Speaker 1: like thirteen fourteen guys that you could really consider, and 506 00:24:45,520 --> 00:24:49,320 Speaker 1: like Alburn Shane Gun I could easily argue, you could 507 00:24:49,320 --> 00:24:51,320 Speaker 1: easily argue he's had a top ten season this year. 508 00:24:51,480 --> 00:24:54,399 Speaker 1: Jalen Brown, for sure. Austin Reeves up until the recent 509 00:24:54,400 --> 00:24:56,480 Speaker 1: stretch he struggled before he got hurt. I did think 510 00:24:56,520 --> 00:24:58,040 Speaker 1: he was about the eighth or ninth or like the 511 00:24:58,119 --> 00:25:01,960 Speaker 1: ninth or tenth best player to start this season. Donovan Mitchell, 512 00:25:02,160 --> 00:25:05,080 Speaker 1: I'd argue could be in that conversation Jamal Murray, We've 513 00:25:05,080 --> 00:25:06,639 Speaker 1: had a lot of guys who've been playing at a 514 00:25:06,680 --> 00:25:09,080 Speaker 1: really high level. It's a small sample size. As the 515 00:25:09,119 --> 00:25:12,199 Speaker 1: sample size gets larger, we'll circle back. You know, we 516 00:25:12,200 --> 00:25:13,840 Speaker 1: had a slow week last week because of the n 517 00:25:13,880 --> 00:25:15,560 Speaker 1: season tournament. They were won a lot of games, right, 518 00:25:15,600 --> 00:25:17,280 Speaker 1: so it made sense for us to do something like 519 00:25:17,320 --> 00:25:19,600 Speaker 1: this to kill some time. But you know things are 520 00:25:19,640 --> 00:25:22,040 Speaker 1: gonna get busy when we circle back in the summer, 521 00:25:22,080 --> 00:25:24,359 Speaker 1: it's a much more complicated conversation. We'll have an entire 522 00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:27,160 Speaker 1: eighty two games slate for all these teams, we'll have 523 00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:30,120 Speaker 1: a playoff run, and we'll have so much more data 524 00:25:30,240 --> 00:25:32,480 Speaker 1: to really kind of parse out who goes where. And 525 00:25:32,520 --> 00:25:36,000 Speaker 1: even then it gets tough. Guys like dude, the top 526 00:25:36,040 --> 00:25:38,640 Speaker 1: tier and second tier stars could very well be seventeen 527 00:25:38,680 --> 00:25:40,960 Speaker 1: eighteen players deep when we go next summer. This last 528 00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:42,760 Speaker 1: year was like I think it was like fourteen if 529 00:25:42,760 --> 00:25:44,879 Speaker 1: I remember correctly, so, like a lot of this is 530 00:25:44,920 --> 00:25:46,880 Speaker 1: just how talented the league is, and you start throwing 531 00:25:46,920 --> 00:25:49,120 Speaker 1: out that, like, oh, this guy's a top ten guy. 532 00:25:49,160 --> 00:25:50,840 Speaker 1: This guy's a top ten guy, and it's like start 533 00:25:50,840 --> 00:25:54,120 Speaker 1: making your list. Who are you kicking off? A lot 534 00:25:54,119 --> 00:25:56,600 Speaker 1: of these dudes are really good at basketball. It's a 535 00:25:56,600 --> 00:26:00,520 Speaker 1: lot harder than it looks on the surface. Al Right, guys, 536 00:26:00,520 --> 00:26:02,399 Speaker 1: It's all I have for today is always sincerely appreciate 537 00:26:02,440 --> 00:26:05,240 Speaker 1: you guys for supporting us and supporting the show again. 538 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:06,919 Speaker 1: I hope everyone has a happy holiday and that you 539 00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:09,800 Speaker 1: enjoy the next couple of days with your friends and family. 540 00:26:09,800 --> 00:26:12,080 Speaker 1: We will be back on Friday with some Christmas Day reaction. 541 00:26:12,600 --> 00:26:13,560 Speaker 1: I will see you guys then,