WEBVTT - The Right Way to Be Wrong

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a Bloomberg Weekly

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. I'm Sarah Pontzek, a reporter on the Cross

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Asset team, and I'm Mike Reagan, a senior editor on

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the Markets team. This week on the show, we'll talk

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to one bull who is sticking to his guns. Doubts

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>are once again swirling about the prospects for a US

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>China trade deal ahead of the upcoming December fifteen tariff deadline,

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but according to a veteran stock market strategist, the signals

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>hint that the longest ever bowl market can keep on running.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.639
<v Speaker 1>And of course we'll close out the episode with our

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>tradition the Craziest Thing I saw in Markets this week,

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and Sarah, I'm excited we got another call to the

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up hotline with a crazy thing a listener

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Solid Market. We did, and he's actually a second time caller,

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So we'll definitely play that message later on in the show.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And remember, if you have any crazy things that you've

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>seen in markets, you have questions that we want to

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge on the show, please feel free to give us

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a call. That number is six four six three two

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>four three four nine zero and we may even play

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>your message on the show. Sorry, I wanted to give

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the listeners a little taste of how people like you

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and I do our our normal day job as UH

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>stocks reporters markets reporters. Probably no big secret, but one

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of the first things I do every morning when I

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>get in is I look through my emails. They're usually

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about eight hundred that came in overnight, but I always

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>search for the words strategy to see what all the

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>strategists on Wall Street are writing about. And you know

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the big banks, you might be lucky to get a

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>note or two a week. But there's one guy who

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I could count on every morning there and his name

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is Jeff salt Um, and I like reading his notes,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not only because it's good market analysis and kind of

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a mix of fundamentals and technicals, but also very well

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>written stuff, so entertaining to read. So very happy to

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>welcome him here to the show. Jeff, welcome to the show.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>You need to raise your standards. We'll see what what

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>email he's reading tomorrow morning. All well, maybe we'll raise

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit with our other guests. One of

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the nicest guys in the building, I think, real mentor

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to me brilliant broadcaster. And that voice you may recognize,

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that's Pim Fox, who's one of our commentators on the

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Markets Live blog here at PIM and a guy who

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sits right behind me. So we we got a lot

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, Pam. How you know I ask you

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions that I can't answer all day long. Well,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>now we'll get to ask you a lot of questions.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Clearly that's gonna happen. Contradictions abound, all right, Jeff, you

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>were with Raymond James for a long time, but you're

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>off to a new adventure now. When you tell us

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what you've got going on now, Well,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I tried to retire eight months ago and it basically

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>lasted three weeks. I've been writing Sought Strategy report for

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>forty eight years, almost forty nine years, and there was

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>such a demand for work that we created an LLC

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and had a website built and a soft strategy www.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Saut strategy dot com is a subscription service um And

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for some reason or another, these people at Capital Wealth

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Planning wanted me to know I'm really a consultant to them,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because if I was an employee, they would have to

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>approve everything I write for Sought Strategy, which you know

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>two to three day turnaround is a lifetime in this business.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a consultant to them, and I'm helping to

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>manage one point seven billion dollars. I'm not not too shabby.

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Three weeks is a pretty short retirement. You got that

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>right back very quickly, so, Jeff is Sarah had pointed out, Um,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>your last note, Uh, you're remaining pretty bullish about this

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>market now. I know you like to look at it

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of a mix of technicals and fundamentals. Walk us

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>three your thinking on. You know, we've had this tremendous

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>rally uh in the stock market. At same time the

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>economic data got a little soft there. Maybe it's bottoming,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe not, it has bottomed, Yeah, you think so? So?

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So is that is that the reason to bolish basically?

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously it would would be a good reason

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to be bullish. Well, Ron Barron. A few years ago,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I was coming back from being on a panel at

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Tiberon down at the RITZ Carlton downtown and he gave

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>me a ride up to the the FDR because I was

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>going to the GM building, which is where Barren Capital

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is and he put his hand on my shoulder halfway

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>through it, and he said, you know, there's not many

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of us left, and I went, excuse me. He said,

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>there's not many of his left that have seen a

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>secular bull market. So the people that say this is

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the longest bull market in history don't know market history,

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>because the nineteen forty nine to nineteen sixty six secular

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>bull market had a number of twenty and decline doesn't

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>end the secular bull market. You had the Jack Kennedy

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>uh Steel crisis in nineteen sixty two, where the steel

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>companies raised prices and the president said, no, you gotta

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>put him back down, and the markets didn't like that

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and they got hit for thirty percent, but the secular

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bull market went on for another four years. In the

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty two to two thousand secular bull market, you had

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the eighty seven crash, which I was actually in Barren

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:05.119
<v Speaker 1>on September eighty seven saying the utilities peaked in the spring,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the trentees peaked in the summer, and we're gonna get

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a waterfall decline. I didn't know to call it a

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>crash because I ain't never seen a crash. I have

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>now and Um, you know, you had the crash twenty

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>two point six per cent in a day, but the

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>secular bull market went on for another thirteen years. So

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in secular bull market the last fifteen

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to twenty years, and there's not many of us left

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>around that have seen one. So for those people who

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.559
<v Speaker 1>are out there saying that we're late cycle and maybe

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have been saying that we're late cycle for years, what

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>would be your rebuttal back to them? My rebuttal back

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to that is the downturn was so severe and the

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>recovery so muted that what you've done is elongate mid cycle.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>We're still in mid cycle in my opinion. We're not

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>late cycle, and if you look at the stocks that

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are performing, it will tell you we're not late cycle.

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So what would uh, what sort of signals would make

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking the cycle is getting late? Well, my dad,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad was in the business, and he to tell me, son,

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>if you think it's going up, be bullish. If you

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's going down, be barished. But for gosh sakes,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>make a call. Because there's so many people in this

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>business that talk out of both sides of their mouths,

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>so that no matter what the markets do. They can say, see,

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I told you so, And if you make calls, you're

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be wrong, and you're gonna be wrong more often

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>than you think. And the trick in this business is

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to be wrong quickly for the minimus loss of capital.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I got no problem at seventy years of age saying, hey,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that was a bad call. I'm reversing, reversing my so.

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a broken clock bull. There was a there's

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>very few people. My friend Dick Russell passed away a

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>number of years ago. He was the last great keeper

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of dow theory, and I down theory is not always right.

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It's subject to interpretation. But there was a down theory

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>cell signal in September. I wrote about it ras cash.

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a down theory by signal in June of

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>oh three. There was a down theory cell signal in

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>November of oh seven, and then the majority of stocks

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>bottomed on October t of oh eight. Two point six

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>percent of stocks trade and made new annual os on October.

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen that. That's a seven or eight standard

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>deviation event. It is not supposed to happen in your lifetime.

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm in print after being barished from November of

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>oh seven. I'm saying the bottoming process is started. And

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on March two, I'm on Bloomberg with Barton Biggs March

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>second of oh nine, saying the bottoming process that started

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in October of last year is complete this week and

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we're all in. So I know Dow theory involves the

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>transportation average. Uh sort of have to conf you know,

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>confirm the down confirming the dow. So, um, how are

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you looking at that now? I mean, uh, is Cheney's

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't out a record right now? The the No, they're not,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>but they did make a new reaction high. And according

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to down theory, the primary trend of the market is up.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And the most important thing in analyzing markets is what

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is the primary trend? Is it up or down? Well,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the primary trend is up. So alongside transports, some other

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>areas of the market that I've heard other strategists investors

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about is needing to confirm the market size have

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>been the likes of small caps. And I know a

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, back in November, you did write

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about a so called golden cross in the Russell two thousands.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I was hoping that you could explain to our

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>listeners what exactly it is and what actually that means.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean we could see more future gains or

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>even uh small caps leading going forward? On November five,

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you had and the golden cross is not as predictive

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for the S and P as it is for the Russell.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's much more predictive for the Russell two thousand, and

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it occurred on November five, and it's when the fifty

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>day moving average crosses above the two hundred day moving average,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and the and the small caps have performed pretty well

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>since then. And it's not just the US. The European

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>small cap induseries had a golden cross on October. So

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of this concerted move by the small caps,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which have lagged by the way they've lagged for all

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this year, and now they're coming to the four uh PEP.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring you in on this a little

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.599
<v Speaker 1>bit too. Um. Obviously it was going to be contrary

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and all this I was gonna say, asked Jeff of

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>those small caps in the Russell two thousand, how many

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of them are actually profitable? I don't know the answer,

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>not many, not many. And the reason I asked it

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in that format is because I was under the impression

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that earnings and economic performance would eventually drive stock prices.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, So why do we have such

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a tepid economy. We got great numbers for employment, We

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>got great numbers if you want to borrow money, but

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy is not growing. And in fact, you know,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look at real inflation what people

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>really have to pay for things, you know, we are

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>at a negative real rate of return for let's say treasuries.

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So is that what drives people putting money into equities?

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>What undepends the market strength? I would argue that the

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>individual investors, for the most part, are not putting money

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in equities. They're not just cautious, they're scared to differ. Yeah,

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a bad trade. By the way,

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a ton of money on the sidelines.

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think before it's over, this is not the way

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>bullmarkets end you've been around. But I'm not talking about

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but necessarily a bullmarket. I'm trying to look at the

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>connection between the performance of the economy and the global

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>economy if you want to add to it, and the

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>performance of equities, because this seems to be the most

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>unloved bull market I can remember, we have stocks. Total

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>return for the SMP five hundred year to date is

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty six and a half percent as total return, so

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it's got dividends and so on. Why don't people why

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you seeing anybody happy? It's it's just it's

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of bullies the actual performance of their portfolios. And

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why you should continue to be bullish. If you

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>remember ninety nine and the spring of two thousand, everybody

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was happy. So the wall of warrior still exists absolutely,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And I would say that the anticipation of future earnings.

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm along a company called zyme Works z y m

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>E at twenty and twenty four and they may have

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the magic bullet for cancer, and the stock has gone

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>from twenty bucks to forty four bucks in six months

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're not making any money. Yeah, but that you

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>can make the argument, right, I mean, if you Sarah

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and Mike, you've written about this kind of stuff before,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>where you have binary events, specifically with the pharmaceutical industry, right,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean a drug gets approved or you know, it

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't perform, and then yeah, I think there's a million

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of them in the small cap well, there's a huge

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>number of y We have a FED meeting come next week.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Most people don't really expect the Federal Reserve to do

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>all of that much change anything. But Jeff, when you

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>look at asset prices across the board and you try

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to conduct your analysis, how much do you take into

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>account what the FED is actually doing well? I think

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED has been one of the drivers

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of of stocks. And I don't think interest rates are

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>going up in the near term. I think they're gonna

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>stay lower for longer than people think. And uh, my

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>work suggests that a fair market multiple in this interest

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>rate environment on the SMP is somewhere between nineteen and

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty times earnings. And if you want to use at

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>your denties hundred and seventy seven dollars from next year

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and put her twenty multiple on that, talking thirty on

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the SMP. You know, when you talk about the FED

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and the balance sheets, I mean, obviously, what are they buying?

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>The FED downs The Fed's buying almost you know, any name,

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a name, a debt instrument that that a central bank

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>around the world is not buying. And you look at

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the bank in Japan, they're buying ets well, well, I

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mean all they're all, that's that's all on their balance sheet.

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>The Fed. What it's really buying now is the short

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the treasury curve. Because we have this trillion

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar deficit, We've got massive issuance of of treasuries, same

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>story next year for the foreseeable future. Is that ever

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna turn around and bite us, Jeff, I don't think so.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I say said I think interest rates are gonna stay

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>over for longer than people think. And I think that

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with the so the the millennials are doing in their

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thirties what the boomers did in their twenties, and they're

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>buying homes and they're eventually gonna shove money at equities,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>which they haven't really done yet, but it's coming. It's coming,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be a huge tale win for the

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>equity markets as well. We've gotten through this conversation the

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>bulk of it without mentioning US and China trade negotiations,

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>which I must say I really respect, but him, I know,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>even paying a lot of attention this week, you can't

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't write it. So why don't you It's a

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>whiplash market, right because you know you you sit looking

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>at the screen, and you can basically tell when a

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>tweet has been put out there by the president or

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>by member of his administration talking about trade one way

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>or another, and so goes the market supposedly. But what

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I did was I took a look at the SMP.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I looked at all the companies in there, and I

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>put together a model portfolio of twelve companies. They're all

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in the tech sector. And these twelve companies have between

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty and sixty five percent of their revenue in China. Right,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>we've heard all about, as you said, trade wars. So

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>what I did was I tried to see, Okay, so

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I how did these stocks actually perform? Well, if you

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>had bought them at the beginning of the year, you

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>would have made on your money. So compare that to

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the SMP six and a half percent you would have

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>made investing in these twelve companies. So then I went

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>back and I said, okay, so maybe this is just

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>an anomaly because it's just one year. I went back

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to the end of sixteen after the election. Because the

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric from candidate Trump is pretty much the same as

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric and the action of President Trump. You would

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>have made even more. You would have made about eighty

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>five percent on your money. And the reason that I

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>came up with is because it's not about trade. This

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>trade wide believe is going to be a footnote. It's

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a about the big pattern changes in trade having to

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>do with Asia. You're looking at four point eight billion

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:13.119
<v Speaker 1>people in Asia, so you've got four point the US economy.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It's still gonna be big, still going to be important,

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but it is a decreasing importance in global capital. So

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that was my take on trade. Ask you to name

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a few of the companies that are in that portfolio.

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, um, A M D for example, Uh, probably

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the chip makers. Um. Also small companies. I looked, for

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>example at Skywork Solutions, not one of the twelve I

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>looked at, but I mean they've got over twenty of

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>their revenue coming from China. I think it just got

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>an upgrade on Thursday and the stock has really outperformed.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>In one of your notes, you did say we expect

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>earnings to rebound just like the economy. How much of

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a rebound is actually possible though, I think you're gonna

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>accelerate by the end of GDP growth, and I think

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>earnings are gonna follow along with that. And again, earnings

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>are the mother's milk of secular bull markets. And you know,

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it was Warren Buffett that said, in the short run,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the stock market is a beauty contest, but in the

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>long run, it's all about earnings, and that's absolutely correct.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I just want to ask you having to do with that, uh,

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>with that point, do you think that this is also

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>going to raise commodity prices? Because if you have GDP

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>growth that is around three percent, will that pull commodities

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>higher as well? Yeah? I think I think commodities are

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to trade higher. I think they've suppressed the price

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>accrued oil too long. I did see where Saudi Arabia

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is talking about four dred thousand barrel hut um. But

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you if you go to China, like

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, you went to China, all you saw

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was bicycles. Now you see his cars and a lot

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of re buicks, which I don't understand, but it's it's

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the demand that's going up in India and China for

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>gasoline and energy is immense. Well, that's a nice segue

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>into another topic you uh touched on recently, and that's MLPs.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>The Semester Limited Partnerships. Mainly it's it's usually wheel pipelines

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that convert to an MLP to get that that preferential

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>tax treatment. These stocks amaze me because every now and

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>then you'll see one with a with a dividend yield

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or distribution yield of like not twenty but double digits

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for Hillari and de Hilarian Index yields between eight and nine.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But yet, you know, when you buy a dividend stock,

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you tend to like that safety. You expect that dividend

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to be stable if not grow MLPs it's a it's

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole another situations. So walk us through how you

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>think about MLPs uh specific there's a big distinction between

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>upstream MLPs and midstream MLPs. The best MLP portfolio manager

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I know is Eric Kaufman at V Capital, and he

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>told me eight years ago, you don't want to own

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the upstreams they have too much price sensitivity to crude oil,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>but the mid streams. Because everybody, all the upstreams went

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt and because of that they sold the mid streams down.

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you can think of midstream MLPs Master Limited Partnerships

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as a transportation company without wheels. Because you're exactly right, Mike.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>They own they own the pipes, and they own the

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>storage facilities, and they have long term contracts with people

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like Chevron Exxon, and they have distributions that the good

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>ones have distributions anywhere from six percent to eight percent,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and the two best in the business or ep D

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and et extraterrestrial. You like that. You like the midstream

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're sort of less sensitive to the price of

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>They basically have no price sensitive They're they're sensitive to volumes,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>how much volume is coming through the pipes. And what

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>your listeners should know is that somewhere between seventy and

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>eight of that distribution is tax deferred. So if you're

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>my age and you're looking for income, it makes a

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more sense to buy the mid streams. And they're cheap,

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the cheapest they've been in twenty years. And my daddy

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>used to tell me some good things tend to happen

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to cheap stocks. Right, So it doesn't matter what the

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>price of oil is, because if you need to transport it,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>you have to transport it somehow. You can't lie it

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting around. It's correct. But speaking of the price of oil, PIM,

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you've you've done some work. I don't want

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to give any spoilers out, but you've got an outlone.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. It has to well, basically, it just has

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with we've got a lot of crude oil

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know Jeff mentioning the pipeline system for example,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 1>it has basically been reversed. Right. There used to be

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that we would import oil, we would process it down

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>in the gall Coast, and then it would be shipped

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>northeast west wherever two consumers in the United States. Well,

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there's so much oil in the United States, those pipelines

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have had to be reversed, and now the oil is

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>going down to the Gulf Coast and it's being exported

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>now it's not and being exported in the form of

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>crew but also in the form of l n G

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>liquefied natural gas, and that is proven to be a

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>big market. But like any big capital intensive industry, you

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta be aware because what happens is there's demand. People

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>see it. So what do they do. They build huge

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>supply opportunities, right, whether that is at a liquefaction plant

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>or building more pipelines or building too many ships. And

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just what happens in the mining industry. That's why

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in what happens to the commodity complex,

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>because unless you get commodity prices to move higher, a

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of these projects, they are very expensive. First of all,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>they are not going to be profitable, and you're seeing

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that with some attempts to shut in production in the

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Permian and in various shale places in the United States

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because they can't get it to a market that can

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>pay for it. In fact, I think there was a

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>story that natural gas was actually the producers were actually

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>paying people to take the natural gas away because they

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>couldn't flare it and they couldn't sell it. So the

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Henry hubb the Henry Hubbs full correct, exactly, it's full.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, when you look at oil, as

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Jeff alluded to, you have the OPEC oil cartel, which

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is trying to manage price by decreasing production. The only

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>problem with that is you have countries like Russia, like

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Nigeria who need the oil. I mean they need the revenue, right,

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that's hard currency for them. Well, what else are you

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>going to sell? So I think that push pull is

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>going to continue. Good. So we've had this range. Yeah, maybe,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>which is for the foreseeable future. I would think so.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I would think that, you know, it's pretty arranged bound

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>because anytime the price starts to go up, what you're

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do is you're gonna see producers in the United

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>States who have got big debt on their balance sheet,

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>They're going to start to produce as much as possible.

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And the US is the swing producer. I think the

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>US now produces fifteen per cent of the world's oil.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>That is amazing. Imagine that fifty years back, all going

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>through Jeff's mid stream MLPs. I guess, as long as

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>as long as the tax, as long as the tax

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>law stays the same. And that is a footnote just

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to mention with the MLPs, because there was a lot

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of issue having to do with getting rid of that

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of real estate investment trust like passed through of income.

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>What if Elizabeth Warren comes in and bands fracking, not

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a snowball's chance in hell? Why do you say that?

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you hear what Kamala Harris said a week ago?

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>She said that, um, when I'm president, of course she's

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>out now. But when I'm president, I'm gonna make all

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the pharmaceutical companies roll back drug prices, and if they

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>don't do it, we're going to confiscate all their patents

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and the government's going to own I mean, I'm gonna

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, you're about constitutional law or law in general.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, how do you go? Long lawyers

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>moved to Washington, d c. Well done, well done. Well,

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about lawyers, I think it's officially time

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Craziest Things segment of the show. Uh, Sarah,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe we got a call to the hotline. What

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell us about that? We did. We got a

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>second time caller. His name is Morgan Hill, and he

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is an investment associate in South Florida. So take a listen.

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Weird of fan that happened. I saw Petra diamonds, which

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are struggling from uh, you know, a lot of debt

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and falling diamond prices, recently sold as twenty carrot blue

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>gym essentially for like fifteen million dollars. Never knew that

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty carrot diamond couldn't be sold for that much, but

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it happened. So crazy thing that happened in the market recently.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say it was a good one, but he

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>took a page out of your book from esoteric markets.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that's true. Fifteen million dollar blue diamond, Jeff,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is your wife getting a special present. She's got the

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>diamond I gave her fifty years ago when it's just

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>like five. Imagine what it would be worth now and right?

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And well that that's what I was going to mention,

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is that just be mindful. What you mentioned is very important.

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a blue diamond. Colored diamonds, colored precious stones are

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:39.479
<v Speaker 1>increasing in value and are rare. On the other hand, sorry, Jeff,

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>regular diamonds, on the other hand, they are falling in price.

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And yes, and there are just too many of them,

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and two beers and the old cartel that used to

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>control them. That's right, they are losing their grips. That's right.

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sarah, Can you top a fifteen million million

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>blue diamond? I challenge you to top that is the

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>craziest thing you saw this week. I will admit offhand

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is a bit of a stretch because it's

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily something that happened in markets, but it does

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>pertain to a certain CEO of one company, and that

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>is David Solomon. The CEO of Goldman Sacks. So Amazon

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was having one of their big cloud conferences, and it

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out that yes, uh, David Solomon is a DJ.

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>He often DJs at different events around the country, sometimes

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in the summer at the Hampton's He's DJ before I know,

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomber has covered it before. Uh, but he DJ at

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>this Amazon cloud event. But the really crazy part was

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that supposedly a lot of people had no idea who

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he was. They didn't they didn't recognize him to literally,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>who's this guy on stage? DJing? Turns out CEO of

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Goldman sex Hey, look, whatever it takes to get Amazon

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as your your client, I guess. Uh. He came out

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>afterwards in a suit and talked about how important a

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>WS is to his business. Jeff, did they tell you

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>about our gimmick? The craziest thing in markets this week?

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>The craziest thing I saw in the past two weeks

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>was Kamala Harris saying she's going to compliscate all the

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>patents that Mirk and Fis or have. Did we see

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>any of the companies react, I don't remembers, non nonplussed,

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why she dropped out. How about you? You You see

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>anything crazy. Well, I mean, I don't know if it's

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>crazy or not. But if you take a look at

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the socks right, which is the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, and

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>then you also take a look at the Philadelphia Gold

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and Silver Miners Index, you'd think they would diverge, right,

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 1>because you buy gold and silver, talk about diamonds and

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so on. You buy those is a hedge of haven right,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you stick those. Actually they both outperformed the SMP five.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And it just you know, the the look at the

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>gold miners that moves in lock step opposite lockstep. The

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>interest rates has nothing to do with any anything else.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And so this idea that you have these havens, these divergences,

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, it's a new it's a it's a

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>different market. Now. It was a crazy year in markets

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>in that it was truly in everything rally, the havens rally,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>treasuries go hold everything rallied, I mean E M debt.

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet no one seemed to like it. Right, Golden

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>t LT both up roughly, the SMP up around. You

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>look at oil up an immense amount. Really everything higher.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The reciprocal of that is in two thousand and eight,

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>everything went down there was nowhere to hide except cash,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>right right, quite the difference. Well, and that even the

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>reserve fund broke at the book, so so even that

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a sure But well, I'm gonna talk about from

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my crazy thing a stock that most certainly did not

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>rally this week, and that is Peloton. I I don't know,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure listeners have probably already heard this, but you're

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>going to climb on your bike about that for those

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>who haven't. You know, obviously the goal of buying a

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>big ad uh placing a big ad budget it in

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the market is to boost sales. Booster stock didn't work

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>out so well for Peloton this week, the adverse effect, right.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So they had this ad where a woman gets a

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Peloton like from her husband for Christmas. She's very excited

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>about Sizike exercise, the exercise bike with the program with

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the the basically an iPad attached to it that you

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>can watch the classes and and she goes gung ho

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>on Peloton for a year and and the internet. I

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>think sarah the word these days, as they just canceled

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Peloton over this. They I as as a husband, Um,

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of at a loss. I think the only

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>solution is not to get your wife anyway. I'll be

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>completely honest. I didn't really see the issue and it

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sure you could look at the ad as being I

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe a bit strange, but hey, if someone

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>got me a peloton, I would be psyched. I would

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>be really happy about it. I don't think I would

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be offended that someone was telling me or hinting at

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>my house. It would become a close wrap something on everything.

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I do have a theory that the guy whoever bought

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen million dollar diamond is a guy who bought

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>his wife a Pelton last Christmas. Cuts a good chance

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. Very good, very good. You sound like you

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>speak from experience conspiracy theories have found from Mike Reagan.

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But with that said, Jeff South Pim Fox, thank you

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on the show to day pleasure.

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. What goes up? We'll be back

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>next week. Until then, you can find us on the

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal website and app or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>We love it if you took the time to rate

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>interview the show on Apple podcast so more listeners can

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>find us. And you can find us on Twitter, follow me,

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at Sara pont Seck, Mike is Reagan Onymous, and pim

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Fox is at pim Fox. You can also follow Bloomberg

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast US at podcasts. What Goes Up is produced by

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Tofur Foreheads. The head of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesco Levie.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, See you next time.