WEBVTT - How Murphy's Law Works, the Redux

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you welcome to Stuff you should know

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>from house Stuff Works dot Com. Hey, and welcome to

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant,

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>who is with me as always but hasn't been with

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>me as always. Mean, there was a dark, dark time

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in my life, Chuck. I call it the pre Chuck era.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>You're two kind. And there were, um several many podcasts

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that I released with other people. Um, I don't feel

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>good about it, okay, but there it's out there. There's

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.639
<v Speaker 1>one that always stuck out to me that I was like,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>there's so much more information. You remember, like back in

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the day, we used to try to hit these things

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>at like five minutes. Yeah, to say this is evolved

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is an understatement, right. Um. So there was one that

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I was like, five minutes is not an enough for this,

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's do something like thirty seven minutes instead. And um

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it was Murphy's Law. So I really this article a

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>long time ago. It was like how Murphy's Law works.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I was raised on these unnatural laws, like the

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Peter principle, which we've podcasted on Parkinson's Law, which is

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>um work expands to fill the time allotted, and then

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Murphy's Law, which is, of course anything that can go

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>wrong will go wrong. Right. So I was kind of

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>always aware of this, and I pitched this idea like

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>how Murphy's Law works, like right after I got here

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works, and um, I got the assignment

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and started doing this research. I found out that there's

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this awesome backstory to this, which I know you know

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>now and have for a while because we made a

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Toyota commercial based on part of it. You're telling me

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this now exactly exactly, So I guess what I'm saying

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is I wanted to redo how Murphy's Law works, a reboot,

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and let's do it. And no disrespect to previous podcasters,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but this was just too short, you know, too short.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't cover Murphy's on in five minutes. No you can't.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So here's the expanded version, and we're not gonna like

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>start rerunning things. Don't worry, there's plenty of topics out there.

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>This one just really kind of I always wanted to

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>redo this one was stuck in your crawl and no

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's no, it's out it's not your crawl. Uh idiom, Josh,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're talking about. Whatever can go wrong, we'll

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>go wrong. And uh, you make a good point at

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this is it's it's an idiom because

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we've made it an idiom, and uh, you don't notice

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and make remarks about when things go perfectly right, you

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>might feel good and be like, hey, everything's coming up

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>rosen today, or maybe that's an idiom. It's not an idiom.

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's a saying. But you never you don't say,

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, boy, I got in this lane of traffic

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's just speeding along, and I should make a

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>saying about that. You can, but very rarely do you Like,

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>we humans tend to focus more on the negative, you know,

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's what Murphy's law is. It's a focus on

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the negative. That's right. We look out for the bad

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way. And Murphy's law itself, Chuck, is not

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that old, to tell you the truth, And it wasn't Um.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't Murphy who originally coined this idea. There was

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 1>a um. There was a something called Sod's law that's

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>still around in Great Britain, which says, uh, basically the

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing, any bad thing that can happen to some

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>poor sod which is short for sodomite, is it? Yeah? Yeah,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>no comment. And then there was a magician named Adam

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hole Shirk apparently in wrote something called on Getting out

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of Things, an essay on magic, which is not on

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Yeah I did too. Actually, um it said

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in a magic act, nine out of ten things that

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>can go wrong usually will And I thought maybe Adam

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was just a bad magician when I read that. Really,

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so he he gets credit, like just about any origin

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>story of Murphy's Law includes Adam hole Shirk, and it should.

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't called Murphy's Law, no, um until a

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>guy there actually was a guy named Murphy, and he

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>actually did live not too long ago. He died in

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nine, I believe this article says, but it's eighty nine. Um,

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go back and change that. And um, he

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was a captain in the Air Force, and he is

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>attributed with not coining Murphy's Law depending on who you

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to, but spurring the idea of Murphy's law who

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>were which was coined by somebody else? Right, So let's

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>let's set the stage Chuck, it's ninety we're in California

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in my hand exactly. We're at um Edwards Air Force Space.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>We need to get into the way back machine here. Man,

0:04:54.720 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while. Okay, So as I said, Edwards

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Air Force Pace. It's very nice. Um, there's Chuck Yeager right,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>see look at him go and then over there on

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that that that railroad track is kind of in the

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>middle of nowhere. Uh is the rocket sled the g

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>whiz rocket sled. That's a Nego name. So let's talk

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about that. Okay, what is it? Well, this was part

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Project m X, and they were tests to

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>determine how the body, the human body, reacted to G force. Yeah,

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a long standing idea that the human body could

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>withstand eighteen g s and all airplanes were designed to

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>uh withstand eighteen g's of force and nothing more, right,

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>which means that, um, they were kind of hamstrung by

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this magical number. But no one knew exactly where that

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>number came from. Her if it was true. What's screwy

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is that they had no way to find out except

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>for these rockets led tests. That's right, using a real

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 1>live human being, Because if you're going to test something,

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't throw a crash test dummy in there. You

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>could in the ninety nine. Now, well, yeah, these days

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they have sensors and actually not to be pluggy, but

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Toyota came up with the thing that that measures the

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>total human uh model for safety and it measures internal damage.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So like it's very sophisticated now, but back then, if

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to find some of the stuff out, you

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>had to put a human in there. Well, at first

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they used cadavers, then they used dummies like Sierra Sam

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and then on the g Wiz rocket tests they used

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>um oscar eight ball, but there they didn't have sensors

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for it, so they had to use John Paul Stapp

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who volunteered, who was a really incredible renaissance man. He's

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a colonel. Yeah in the Air Force. He was a

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>physician UM and he uh he flew around in a

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in an airplane without a canopy. Remember that I've heard that. Um.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He also uh basically made it his life's work to

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get seatbelts made mandatory in automobiles. So he staged the

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>first ever UM automobile crash tests, and he did it

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>at the expense of the Air Force, and the Air

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Force was like, hey, whoa, what are you doing? What

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are you expensing these dust for? These are cars, we

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we fly planes. And he came up with statistics that

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>showed that more Air Force pilots died from car rex

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and from plane rex and they said okay. And that

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was just the kind of guy. He was, real stand

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>up dude, he was. So what he did was he

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>jumped in the g with said, hey, I'll do it.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Colonel John Paul Staff. I do this kind of thing.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And it would go about two hundred miles an hour

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>down a half mile track and then stop in less

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>than a second. And what they're trying to test is

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>say that one more time to go two hundred miles

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>an hour and stop and lessen a second. Yeah, that's crazy.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>That's basically they're trying to test what might happen in

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a plane crash. So they were they were finding the

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>force of gravity, how much a human coupe withstand? And

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>remember eighteen was that magic number, And in very short

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>order John Paul stap withstood eighteen ges and then twenty

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and then and I think he made it up to

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>forty six point to six was the most he experienced.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you're ever like the highest roller coaster would

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>always go to that, but the roller coaster with the

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>highest acceleration is like two point seven g's. This guy

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>did forty six point to six and he suffered for

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it too. Yeah, big time, broken bones, concussions, broken blood

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>vessels in its eyes. Yeah, he'd have white outs, which

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is when when he was going backwards, they'd turn him

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>around sometimes so he wouldn't get the bugs in his

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>face and he would have white outs, which is all

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the blood is pulling in the back of the head,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>so he has no blood in his eyes, which means

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you can't see or you get read out to where

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>all the blood was pulling in the front of his

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>face and he couldn't see because there was too much

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>blood in his eyes. I wonder if they were like, hey,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>let's put him sideways, it happens, it would be like

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a pink out. Yeah, a one eye is read one

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is white. Yeah. So this is all going pretty well

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for step if you consider that a success. And then

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Murphy Captain Murphy shows up on the scene and says, hey,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've got these sensors that will give you

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a much more accurate read of the g force. So

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>let's get my assistant. I don't know why he didn't

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>do it himself. No, it was one of the This

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is Project MXE. It was one of the project's assistants. Murphy.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't he do it is what I want to know.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because there's another saying if you want

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>something done right, do it yourself. And I would have

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>rubbed that in his face. They didn't, though, and and

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>supposedly tell him about the sensors, well, that the sensors

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>would give you a more accurate reading. And then the

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>assistant evidently, uh, hook them up wrong. And there are

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there was one way to hook up each one of these,

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and he did the opposite way for two ways. Well,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>there's one correct way right to hook up the censor,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and then he did it the wrong way on every

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>single one of them. And then Murphy said out loud

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to somebody that if there are two ways of doing something,

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>one of these will result in disaster. He's gonna do

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it that way, or he said something along the lines

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of if there's any way they can do it wrong,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they will. Um. It depends on who you talk to.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>There were living witnesses in two thousand when this guy

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for Improbable Research, who who hosts the ig Nobel Awards

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>UM wrote a pretty comprehensive article on it um and

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he interviewed these people and they said he roughly said that,

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>or he said something like you said, but ultimately he

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was grumbling and it was loud enough, and he was

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>saying it about these people that he just met, who

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>had you know, incorrectly hooked up the sensors. Okay, well

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>let's hook him right and do it again. It's not

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. So Murphy apparently, if you talk to

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the witnesses, was kind of thought of as a bit

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of a jerk. That's what I think, which is something

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>his son still to this day disputes. He says that

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that is not in his father's character. His father was

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not a jerk, and he wouldn't have he wouldn't have

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>been so rude or boorish. But most of the witnesses

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>say he said something like that. That was the seed.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>How did the tree come about? The tree came about?

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Because uh, stab was apparently a pretty gregarious guy. Obviously,

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>if he's taking part in these tests with a plum,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>then he's gonna probably be a pretty fun guy to

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be around. Well, he had he had two books Chuck

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of um idioms. One was it was called STAPs Almanac,

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the other was four Year Moments of Inertia. And he

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>had already come up with his own little saying Stepp's

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>ironical paradox, which is the universal aptitude for an aptitude

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle. So he was

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>already generally on the lookout for new bits of wisdom.

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>He's stealing these things from people, basically, and he stole

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it from Murphy Fee and at a press conference the

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>next day said and this is where you know it

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>took off obviously, because the press conference he said that, hey, uh,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we we have a good safety record because we are

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>aware of Murphy's law, which is whatever can go wrong

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>will go wrong. And they all got a big laugh.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>That's brilliant, and they all ranted the pay phones and

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>called it in. Yeah, it makes it into like some

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>aerospace publications, and then it disseminates out. It's just like

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>just a perfect gem, perfectly encapsulated. Whatever can go wrong

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>will go wrong. It's just say universal truth in unnatural law, right,

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and um it kind of gave a kickstart to this

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>whole There's a trend in the fifties of people being

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>pithy like like, um because Peter and Principle. Yeah, and

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>actually I found out, Um, Lawrence Peter, who who came

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>up with the Peter principal and um Captain Murphy became

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>lifelong friends. Wasn't that special in it? Um. But it

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>gave rise to all these other ideas, these unnatural laws.

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of a trend. Like I said, in

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the fifties and sixties, I think people wanted to put

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>their name on something. Right, So I selected a few

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>out of there's lists on the internet that are just

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you can scroll for hours now at the bottom of

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>these things, right, but um, you want to read some

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of these Uh. It tours observation. The other line moves faster,

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense. Boobs law. You will always find something

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last place you look. What's another good one here?

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Franklin's rule, blessed is he who expects nothing, for he

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>will not be disappointed. Lincoln's law, those who can do

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>do those who cannot teach, which just mean. It is mean,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>especially to teachers. It's so disrespectful. Uh. And then Patton

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>General Georgia's Patton had a law that a good plan

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to day is better than a perfect plan tomorrow, because

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>by then Charlie's killed you Right, he wasn't Vietnam, No,

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but oh you just meant a guy named Charlie. Okay, yeah,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>uh so yeah. People obviously like naming things after themselves

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and coming up with pithy little sayings that people like

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to say. Right, But there's there and there's two ways

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that Murphy's law can be um categorized. It can be

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>categorized in the realm of pithy sayings from the fifties

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and sixties, like the Peter principle, which, as you remember,

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it did make sense it had it had some gravity

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to it Peter. Or you can look at Murphy's law

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and the coining of it in by John Paul stat

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>as the formulation of the basis for all engineering thought

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that came after that point, which was the creation of

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fail safe, the creation of redundant systems, and the idea

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that you should plan for everything going wrong so that

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if it does go wrong, it's covered and the system

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want it won't break down. Sure, it gave a

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>saying to that practice. It was already in practice, but

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>people didn't start building fail says because of Murphy's Law.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm saying, I don't know, man, well, seatbelts,

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a fail safe. Uh. And that is not just

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>from Murphy's Law. That was from staff himself when you're

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>pushing this legislation. So let's talk about like the principles

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>going on behind Murphy's law. Fatalism, it's pretty much it.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Fatalism is the idea that we are just walking around

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>subject to whatever fate, you know, whatever happens to us,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever fate dictates. Like, if you're in a line of traffic, right, yeah,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and you it seems like all other lines are going

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>except for yours, right. This is explainable. It's explicable, Like

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not paying attention to the other lines of traffic

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>when your line is going because you're paying attention to

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>not hit the person in front of you. When you're

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>just sitting there, all you notice is that the other

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>lanes are going. But if you could really statistically explain,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, how often the lanes of traffic are moving,

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's probably fairly even. Probably, so I always kind of well,

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>actually have I go in the lane that I think

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to be moving. But because we're fatalistic, we

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>we It's like, why why does the universe hate me?

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally powerless to make traffic move right? And then

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>free will was not well, not the opposite. But that's

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the other idea, is that, uh, we have free will

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for all of our choices and all of our consequences

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are due to things that we have made happen, right,

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and the the attendant with free will is the risk

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of failure. So when we have a fifty chance of

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>getting something right, well, we're gonna get it wrong or

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna notice mostly when we get it wrong, because

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>then we have to do it again, and it's just

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so much trouble to try to put the plug in

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the right way. Yeah right, the three pong failsafe plug

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you yeah, okay, but other prongs electrical sockets. If you

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>look at them, one's bigger than the other, that's fail safe.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>After Murphy's Law changed everything another for that, it was

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just death ville for everything there was well yeah, well there,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>let me put it to you this way. There was

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>something like um, twenty five million licensed motorists in the

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>US and like forty three thousand deaths on the highways

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in like nineteen sixty, I think something like that. In

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand there was seventy five million licensed motorists and

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>about as many deaths. So yeah, when before Murphy came

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>along and there were no fail safe and one had

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>any idea what they were doing, I'll dispute that. But

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>did ever show you the video of the the car

0:17:54.880 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>crashes like the old what blood on the asshole? The uh?

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>They did this? High speed car crashes with an old

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>like you know when you see those old tanks like

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>oh man, back then were in Paula or something. Yeah,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like those big old tanks. Those were like they were

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>tanks because their tanks and they I bet you were

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>safe in those seat belts. But they compared the crash

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to a modern car and the old car, man just

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean squashed and crumbled like a tin can. Really,

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 1>oh dude, yeah, because cows cows. Cars are just engineered

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>these days, as our cows couple zones and things like yeah, man,

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's it might be made of plastic, but it's

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>amazing when you watch this thing. Back then, they were

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>huge and made of metal, but at enough impact that

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>metal just becomes nothing it's pretty interesting. Speaking of cows

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>being engineered. You remember that cow um on Millage in

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Athens that had the porthole in it so they could

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 1>like open it up and reach inside and I think

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>fertilize it or they were doing something. I never saw that,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>but that cow. It was crazy. Murphy's law happened to

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that cow. I wrote about that. They they have those

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>little portals into their stomachs so they can study things

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like that's like right there on the side. And then also, Chuck,

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out Rodyard Kipling, right, he provides

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>us a good example of the whole y me attitude

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of humanity, and then the mathematical explanation of why you

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>pal you're Kipling once lamented that no matter how you

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>drop it, the the bread that you dropped out of

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>your hand onto the floor always falls butter side down,

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>which means you can't treat it any longer, and it

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 1>gives you the vapors so um. If you think about it,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a buttered piece of bread is heavier on one side

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>than the other, so thanks to the force of gravity

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>on the way down, the bread is going to flip

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>over that. But it's yes, but it's heavier as we

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>proved this, give me some bread. Well, I just don't.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted has proven and not. I think it's interesting.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>But we'll think about this. I just wonder how much

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>butter would it literally take to cause it to flip over.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a certain amount, And I think also this is

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>going to happen more frequently with um plain untoasted bread

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and butter rather than like toast with butter melted in it,

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>which may be distributed evenly throughout the bread. But the

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>point is is, yes, it's going to flip over, but

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to flip back over because the heavier

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>side is now being dragged towards the earth. But if

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it does fall butter side up, then that's just good luck.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>That's fate. Okay. So again there's there's a certain amount

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of I guess math or science to Murphy's law. There

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>can be if you really want to look for it.

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And your name's Joel Pell right, Yeah, he's he's another

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>fun killer, like the laughter guys. I know math people

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>will take issue with that, but I take issue with

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>everything having to be stated as a math formula. Well,

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this guy, he begs to differ. He does he's a

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>biological engineer at the University of British Columbia, and I

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>think in two thousand five he came up with Murphy's equation,

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>which basically he figured out how to quantify the probability

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that things will go wrong when they can go wrong.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Right A, you're gonna read it. It's pretty impossible to

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>read out loud. Yeah, I don't. I don't think I can,

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because what's the opposite of to the something power when

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like down below into the right rather than up

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>into the idea. Well, basically he figured out that the

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>importance of the event I times the complexity of the

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>system involved CE times the urgency of the need for

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the system of work you plus the frequency the system

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is used equals p the probability that the Murphy's law

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>will kick in. And one is definite. I think ten

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is it's not going to happen, and somewhere in between

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>is it might happen, it might not. So what he

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>did was he basically plugged in the um the possibility

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of his clutch going out in a rainstorm sixty miles

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred kilometers from his house UM, and he came

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.479
<v Speaker 1>up with an answer of one, which means that his

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>clutch was definitely going to go out. And he further

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated that what now that he's stranded out in the

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>rainstorm and he needs to get somewhere by foot, he

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>needs his flashlight to work. Um, what's the what's the

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>probability that Murphy's law will happen and the flashlight will

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>be out? He plugged it in and came up with

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the one again. So he very facetiously proved that Murphy's

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Law is real and his equation worked. I hope this

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>guy got stuck in a rainstorm a flashlight, That's what

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope. Poor Joel pell I had to um correspond

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with him for this. Yeah, I did get permission to

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>use his equation and he said, sure, here's a cool dude.

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah really Yeah? All right, So, Chuck, we talked about

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like prongs being designed with fail safe seat belts are

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a fail safe diesel pump nozzles there. They are designed

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>at a wider diameter than regular gas pumps, so you

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>can't fit it in your gas tank. Did you know that? Yeah?

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't always a case, because I put diesel in

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a in a truck one time when I shouldn't have.

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And when did it start? After Murphy's law became widespread

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>started in the mid nineties, I think, or that's the

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>last time I screwed up like that? What you got? Uh?

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I got nothing else? Thank God for fail Safe. So

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>thank god for John Paul Staff and Captain Edward A. Murphy, Jr.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a Chuck's key law. I got my two

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>house keys. I have a outer security like a clear

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>door and then my regular door. Two different keys that

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>look the same. On my dog Leach will almost a

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of the time I used the wrong key.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet if you paying attention to it, you use

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the wrong you about fifty percent at the time. That's

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Murphy's law. Well, then something's up. I also have my

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>directional thing. I have a port into direction almost dude,

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's awful. I didn't know that almost a hundred percent

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>of the time I will go the wrong way if

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>faced with a choice, should I go this way or

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that way? And if I try to trick myself and

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>go I want to go right, then I'm gonna go left.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>It was right nice. That's Murphy's law too. I know

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then it ruins my life. But you can't just hijack

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Murphy's law and slape your name on it. Those are

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's that's chuck ski law and Chuck's law of direction. Right,

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that's Murphy's law. All right. If you want to learn

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>more about Murphy's law and read my article on it.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the first articles I wrote it.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Um, you can type in Murphy's Law

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>in the search bar at how stuff works dot com.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to this one twice. Yeah, thanks

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for doing it with me. Now, well it was it

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>was Do we were due for this one? Yeah? Um,

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I said hand these first part, didn't I?

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think so? All right, Well that since it's time

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for what we're gonna wind up the old Facebook asked

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Jock and Chush questions and people did so you always

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get like a hundred of him in a couple of minutes.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to shut it down. Yeah, people want to know,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, So let's just run through some of these. Josh,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you got one, go ahead, all right? Who's your favorite

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons character who was not a Simpson? Well? Cheers? And

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I even saw this one yesterday and I didn't it's

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>so hard. I like Lionel huts a lot. He was good. Um,

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I like uh, I like the whole Flanders family. I

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think Ned's a great complex character, like the one where

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he has the nervous breakdown. Yeah, and it turns out

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he was part of a spanking protocol research study. I

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>like it when he's occasionally ripped. Yes, well he is

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time because sometimes he's wearing a shirt. Well,

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly different when like when when he's in the ski

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>suit than when he's in his sweater. Yeah, that's most hilarious.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Stupid sexy Flanders. What about yours? I'm gonna go with

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a cop out. I'm gonna go with a pair with

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Ralphin and Chief Wigham. Yeah, they're good, pretty good. Or

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Smithers and Flanders. I mean that's those two that are

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>hard to beat as a as a duo. I mean

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't leave out Seymour Skinner yeah boo yeah, or Barney.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 1>We can keep doing this for hours. Actually, I like

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>mo are you a mo fame? Yeah? Huge mo fame? Okay,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, we could do this for hours. Go ahead, Uh, Chuck,

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>do you have a job outside of the podcast? Um?

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I do. I'm the chef and housekeeper. At my home.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I mean here. Oh no, do you not

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>since when? Oh? Well yeah, sure we write stuff? Yeah

0:26:54.400 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, blog right quizzes? Do? Uh? We we manage Facebook?

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Can Twitter? We managed the stuff? You should know? Brandon? Uh,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you want written on your tombstone? I don't

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you go ahead? How about died tragically rescuing his family

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>from the wreckage of a destroyed sinking battleship. That is suspicion.

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna say that. Yeah, that's a good one. Um.

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was Kelly Cronly. I'm sorry, and Drew Clinkole

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>asked about The Simpsons. Thanks Drew and Kelly on my tombstone.

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to say what? Uh this is from trash

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Goblin Toby? Is this from Twitter? I guess it is.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen Hodgeman's mustache in real life? And is

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it as scary as I have heard it is? We've

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.959
<v Speaker 1>both seen Hodgman's mustache in real life. It accidentally brushed

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>my shoulder. I was like, like, how did that happen? Uh?

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It is not scary. I think John wears it well. Yeah,

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not an ironic mustache. He's grown his hair

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit. He turned off hippie, hasn't it? Yeah,

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of fun. He's like, I like it. Uh,

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>let's see it. Could it be? This is from How

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Awesome is Joe? A k A Joe on Twitter? Okay,

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>could it actually be possible for human to be raised

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>by apes? Like Tarzan? I would say the answer is

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>undeniably yes. Yeah, And I'm gonna wind it up for

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>my last one with um something. People ask a lot

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what does c O A mean? And that it's from

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Gubbles, do not explain it. That's a trick. He's

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>been trying to figure it out forever and if he

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>can't do it on his own, he has to figure

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it out on his own, Chuck, or else he's never

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna learn. All right. Uh sorry Joseph, but that was

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a SmackDown. Um, what's our favorite episode? Chuck? Of what

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of stuff? You should know? I thought were on the

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Simpson Oh man, I get asked this a lot I have.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It's always different today. I'm gonna go with um Lobotomyes,

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a good one. Nothing, none of them. It's there's

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>just so many. I know, it's hard to choose. Like

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll look through occasionally in spot ones they're like, oh,

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>how's it going. I don't think that because we're always

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>assets and always say the same like five things like

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>who lobotomy's body, farms, cannibalism, you know what. Um, I've

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>recently listened to what is the FDA regular herbs. I

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>think I was telling you good and that is worth

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>listening to again. All Right, some people you know are

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>making their way through again. They've already made it through,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and they've made it through. They're making it through again

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole catalog. I'm looking at you. OMG, Chris, there's

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a name for people like that, Josh Massacus. Super fans,

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Yes, if you are a super family want

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you always. We're pretty friendly guys, so

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll say hi back usually. UM. If we don't, don't

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>take it personally, keep saying high a lot of them. Twitter. Uh,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's s y s K Podcast is our Twitter handle.

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>We're on Facebook at facebook dot com slash stuff You

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>should know um and you can send us email like

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned to Stuff Podcast at how stuff works

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Be sure to check out our new video podcast,

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuff from the Future. Join how Stuff Work staff as

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we explore the most promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow,

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you