WEBVTT - Eaton Vance's Peabody Sees Opportunities in High-Yield

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. Along with my

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>whether at the grocery store or the trading floor. Find

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Target is in the spotlight today,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>or should I say on the hot seat. It shares

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>plunging the most in more than eight years, down more

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>than twelve per cent, after announcing plans to cut prices

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to get customers back in the door. I want to

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>bring in Burt Fleckinger, man ing director at Strategic Resource Group,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for more insight on what's behind the plummeting shares and

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the potentially UH negative outlook. But did this come as

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to you? No surprised Lisa's As we talked

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in earlier Bloomberg broadcast anyone has seen in the stores.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Just problems in Syriotom for example, for Christmas Hanukah, Kwanza

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>through Valentine's Day, finding fashion, jewelry, Department's most important department

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the store, unstaff, do you have to ring a

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>bell for service waiting for godo? Nobody comes to serve

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the shoppers, People walk out, go to Cole's, Walmart, Walmart,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Sears Kmart and uh the company's off course and uh

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the new definition of being rudderless for Target retail, which

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is very un characteristic for the company. Well, butt, You've

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>got a company, it's got a market cap of thirty

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>two billion, They've got about two and a half billion

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in cash, their threety one thousand employees. What can Brian

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Cornell do in order to turn this surround? Is it worth?

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it worth what it's being priced at right now,

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which is fifty eight dollars a share them it's a

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>good price right now. That Bloomberg Terminals reporting a five

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>year low UH for Target flat over five years compared

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to the S and P being up over sevent same time,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>your present point on Target needs to UH take cash

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>off its balance sheet, invest in capex, they're distinct disadvantage Kroger, Walmart, Coles,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>H and M everybody they compete with because Targets outsourced

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>just about everything. Outsource distribution cost the goods are too

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>high to leass present point on prices. UH. Target spacing

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a price war, pervasive price war of unprecedented proportions for

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for the next few to five years. UH, Walmart, Legal,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Because they're they're cat of goods or lower

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>targets keeps getting higher from outsourcing. Target needs well. But

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>hang on, Burt, But I mean I was looking at

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Brian Cornelli's biography. He's the chief executive of Target and

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the chairman. I mean he was the CEO of Sam's Club.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>He also was the CEO of the America's Food division

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for PepsiCo. Is he the one that's going to make

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this happen or do they need new talent in the

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in the boardroom him? It's uh, Lisa Brownham. What's his

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg hot hot seat up in Minnesota, Brian, Brian Cornell

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>has got one more fiscal to deliver. Uh. It looks

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>look like he's going to bring great new leadership to

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the company. But with John Stump, who now left on

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the board other board members of sleep at the switch,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>kind a Rip Van Winkle routine. Uh, you need new leadership,

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and regrettably it's almost like a Mackenzie like monarchy with

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the consultants half running the company and erroneous assumptions, erroneous conclusions.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>They need to invest in Target dot Com. They need

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to invest in self distribution. Uh, and they need to

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>invest in staffing instead of cutting hours and and having

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>shells that are too empty that impair the same store

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>sales and operating income. You know, there's there's a quote

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg story about Targets results from one analyst saying,

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we are stunned. We thought they were going the other

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>way with higher margins stuff. I mean, this is sort

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of what's at stake here. Target was always thought to

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>be the higher quality version, uh, and sort of tried

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to lure people who had a higher price point than

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>say Walmart. But now Target appears to be putting Walmart

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's compete as as sort of like a competitor,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or at least on that level. Is this is this

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>strategy going to work for them? What they're doing isn't working.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Lisa's as you Pam, your great producer, Sam Langon, I've

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>discussed offline in the studio for for months. UH. Target

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>has gone the wrong way, and also Targets probably the

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable company to being organized by the ufc W,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Retail Clerks Union, UH, because even even the workers

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that want to take corrective action on the out of

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks are disciplined and run off. We call it the

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Volkman rule after Carl Volkman, who was fired for overriding

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>an inventory management system that wouldn't order product for product

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that was out of stock on the shelves, and the

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>company decided in favor of the consultants and the constructive

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>UH students who are highly rated in terms of productivity,

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>wound up getting sacked in the stores. And UH. You know,

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>for for all the problems that you and Pimm have

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>presently pointed out, least in retail, all Targets problems are

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>self inflicted. And Brian, Brian Cornell's got a got a

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>few quarters to FIXTS. That's not totally fair because we

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>also have this sort of elephant in the room, right,

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>We've got Amazon. How much is this just Amazon creating

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a food fight among the rest of the brick and

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>mortars Amazon on creating a food fight. Yes, Lisa. Yet

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>yet at the same time, Target dot Com at uh

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>stupidly outsourced Target dot Com fulfillment to Amazon for nearly

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a decade. So Target dot Com is way underdeveloped that

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>areas growing quickly. But Target got complacent in basic apparel

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and fashion, especially for boys and girls and young women

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and men. And even uh, Target and Sears with lands

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>and have better basic fashion as does Walmart for the

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>first time in fifty years, and many key categories in apparel,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and Uh that's self inflicted from Target. To Opportunity or

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>stay away bird flicking show for all Chinese sign pim

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and danger. I'd bet on opportunity, okay, and as

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>well as with the bonds too for Target. Uh, definitely

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with the bonds. I would bet against the bonds for Bergdorf, Neiman, Marcus,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Grouper and MG. I would bet on the bonds for

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Target at divis are going to come in. Uh, the

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>consultants are going to go out. You'll have better leadership,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>better business, better bond prices, better equity prices. Yeah, I'm

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Target two point nine percent bonds. Uh.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>There are a mirror one hundred and two point three

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>cents on the dollar total discount. But this is an

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a UH and A minus rated company. This is a

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>company that has a study revenue stream. So that's why

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you're saying they're going to be able to repay their debt.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not the issue. Yeah, And this is also this

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is also a company that's neutralized Christmas hank quans and

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>no merchandizing signs, no real good merchandizing activity. And as

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed, more vacuum cleaners in the ads in Christmas

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and hanak and quansa items during the key holiday selling period. UH,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>companies clearly gone the wrong way. And with a lot

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of merchants getting sacked and the consultants making the refreshed decisions,

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that that's a perscription UH for sick company getting sicker.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But at least, as you and Tim said, it's fundamentally

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a strong company founded by the great Dayton family and

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>there's still large shareholders in one way or the other

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in the honor of founder George Draper Dayton and the

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>late Great Bruce Bliss Daton who passed away within the

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>last year. UH. This this company will come back I'd

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be much more worried about nord uh than than I

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>would be Target Uh. But Target Target we're gonna have

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. We're gonna you know, it's interesting you

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about North because we want to get your views

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on it. We're gonna have to leave that for another time.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Because NORDSTN reported results recently and they exceeded analyst estimates.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The stock moved higher. So I'm interested to hear what

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>worked flicking share of Strategic Resource Group has to say

0:08:44.679 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about that. It's been yet another stellar by of months

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>for US high yield bonds. Yields on the deck can

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>no longer be considered high. They are low yield bonds

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>at five point six percent, the lowest UH since two

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen. Has this market gone too far? I want

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Henry Peabody, co manager of the Eaton

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Vance Multisector bond Fund. He is the expert in all

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>things fixed income. Henry, I'm so glad that you're here. Uh, Henry,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? Do you think that the bond

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that the US hi yield bond market has gone too far?

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Probably has um thinking about yields in the mid fives,

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about default rates, UM expected real returns, it's not

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>too compelling. Fortunately, this is a market that active can

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>do reasonably well in UM. For US, we see opportunities

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in US high yield UM. Not the broad market, but

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly a few UM. But spreading what well, you know,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we're watching the retail sector fairly closely. UM. I can't

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>say that we're UH diving in, but we're watching it

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>fairly closely. So just to put this into perspective, a

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have been talking about a retailer recession,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and we heard Bert Flickints share earlier on this program

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and analyst of the retail sector saying he thinks Nordstrums

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be in real trouble and that the bonds

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>could be in real trouble. Do you agree, No, not necessarily, UM.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>We're still very early on in this process. UM. It's

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>going to take a little while for this to settle out.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>You think about energy and you know, post OPAC Thanksgiving

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of years ago, and it takes off

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of us to shake out. So it's it's a slow

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>moving process and one that you need to UM follow closely,

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>establish starter positions UH and watches spreads evolve, but hard

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to make a distinct call on that credit per se today. Well,

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what would you be looking for? What are the characteristics?

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You know? I think you look for companies that have

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>good online presence, UM, good uh footprints in good regions,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with good product suites. But how about if you could

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>just give me some number, like what kind of numbers

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>are you looking for? You're looking for a certain amount

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of cash flow? Or because I mean all every company

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I know looks for exactly the things that you're describing.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to be, you know, the old shoe.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>What what are the financial characteristics that you deem a

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>winner as opposed to someone you want to stay away from. Well,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to evolve, and I think what

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>we look for in any position is a good liquidity runway.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>You need a company that can weather a challenging environment.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You need liquidity, UM. You need assets that are will

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it that a company is willing to protect good assets UM.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Potentially salable assets if those in the case of retail,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>if that's a real estate UM. So you need a

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>company with a relative mode from a competitive standpoint. But

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's all gonna evolve over the next year or two.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>As this situation. Does you know, Henry and a lot

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of people talk about rich valuations in the higher bond market.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to think about the Carlyles and the black

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Stones and the Kkrs of the worlds that have been

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing money for distress debt funds uh and have a

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>record amount of dry powder on their books. Won't this

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>prevent the higher bond market from falling too far? Or

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is it? Is it bad to read too much into

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this sort of stash of cash. Well, you saw that

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with energy, right, You saw a great deal of capital

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>being raised in the private equity space for energy, and

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there were fewer transactions because of that. Uh. You saw

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that valuations between the band and the office side never

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>actually reached a clearing point. But by the same token,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you did see a great deal of capital availability. So

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>these companies were able to access the capital they need

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and come around the other side. So does private equity

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>put a floor underneath it at the margin? Yeah? Okay?

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So um, what's eaten vances sort of base case scenario

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for ten year treasuries for the end of the year. Well,

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's important to point out that we don't have a

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>top down view form from an economist personally then I

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>think you need to think about the tenure out as

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a reflection of nominal growth. And so if you believe

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is going to achieve nominal growth in the

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>four percent range, then you need to think about a

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>four pressure towards a four percent Okay, so if that happens,

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>if there is pressure towards a four percent ten year yield,

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>what would that do to HILD bonds. Well, you'd have

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 1>to My guess is with the front end of the

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>curve coming up at the same time, you would likely

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>see negative convexity. You'd see this market extend. You would

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>see HI yield extend away from being priced to call

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and more to being priced to maturity. So you would

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>see uh duration extend performance be fairly soft. Um. That

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>would be in the context of better growth, which should

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>see spreads contract, so other words, losses, but they'd be tempered. Yeah,

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fair fair assessment um in the

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>multi sector bond income fun right, Uh, what kind of

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>cash position are you holding right now? We're about seven

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or eight percent today? Is that considered high? That's a

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>little higher than it has been, but we've been as

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>high as twenty UM in mid fourteen. We were, um,

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>when there was are you looking for reasons to get

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>into cash right now? Are you going after? I noticed

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got Australian Queensland government bonds, you got bonds from Brazil, Canada,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and you do have a bunch of energy debt in

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there as well. Sure we have. We still have some

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>legacy energy and materials positions that are doing very well.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But we've been looking more towards the e M side

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>over the past handful of months. Um. We think we've

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>owned Brazil for a while and that was a good

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>performer for us last year. But there's been some good

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate issuance recently that, um, you know, we think offers

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a good deal of return over the next handful of years.

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We think that dollar strength is probably reaching uh high, Um,

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you hope, So if that's going to get paid in

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Canadian dollars. I was looking today one thirty two against

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the Luna dollar strengthening. Yeah, the dollar has been strong,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but our non dollar positions have actually benefited us this year. Um.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Aller has rolled over against most major currencies since the

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year. We had that rally post election

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in a fade since then, all right, I want to

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for coming in and spending time

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>with us. Henry Peabody as co manager of the Eaton

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Vance Multisector Bond Fund. P and L is brought to

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you by proper Cloth, the leader in men's custom shirts.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>At proper cloth dot com, ordering custom shirts has never

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>been easier. Create your custom shirt size by answering ten

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>easy questions, select from over five fabrics to suit your

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>personal taste. Shirts start from eighty five dollars and are

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>delivered in just two weeks with proper Cloths perfect fit guarantee.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Remakes are completely free and expert staff are standing by

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to help. For premium quality, perfect fitting shirts, visit proper

0:15:53.360 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>cloth dot com Custom shirts made Smarter. There was a

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>great scroup that came out overnight by Bloomberg News is

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Laura Keller along with a couple of her colleagues talking

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>about how c l s A, the brokerage which is

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>owned by China Citic Securities, dismissed ninety US based employees

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. This is basically them closing their US equity

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>research team and for more, I want to bring in Laura,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>who joins us now in our Bloomberg eleven three, Oh, studio, Laura,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>First of all, just sort of give us a sense

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>how long has c L s A been in the

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>business of US equity research and how big of a

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>departure is this for them? Right, So, Lisa, they've been

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>here since about two thousand nine, so it's definitely some

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>franchise that's been here for a while. When is that

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>eight years? Um? And they're I mean, they're not small,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're not one of our huge, sort of bold brackets.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course. So they had about um, I guess it

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>would be around a hundred sixty people in the US.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Were some very well known ones, yes, very well known.

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayo is really sort of their star guy. Um.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>They also had um some tech analysts as well, obvious

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Silver and McGuire we mentioned in our story. And Mike

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Mayo of course being this very prominent, very outspoken bank analyst.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Today he's at the JP Morgan conference. He he actually

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>called himself a free agent, um, since he's not working

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>at c L s A anymore, and he was dismissed

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>along with ninety others um as you mentioned, h late

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>in the day, we understand called into a meeting around

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>four fifteen aftermarket clothes and let let known that they

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would be no longer working there. UM. And we have

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this image as well, uh and our story of Mike

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Mayo walking home with this box um of things, you know,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>presumably from his his desk in his office there. Can

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you explain why did c ls A decide to do this? So,

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean c ls A has had a lot of

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble with this um Us business, but also with their

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>equities brokerage. I mean they were bought UM by a

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Chinese firm, Civic Securities in two thousand, goes all the

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>way back to Creditly right, yes, and they bought it

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>from that French bank UM. So they actually had tried

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to sell um CIDEC had tried to sell these guys

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and they weren't I guess presumably able to find a buyer.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>So they've had some trouble since. Back then. You know,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>we had reported UM. One of our Asian colleagues, I

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>think it was Kathy Chan in UM September reported that

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the bank actually pulled this sort of it's a very

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>unusual thing where they asked people to voluntarily take unpaid

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>vacations of up to ten days and that's they were

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>just trying to save money, and this is something that

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>they have done three other times when they've gotten in trouble.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.719
<v Speaker 1>But I mean that's a very unusual measure, UM, and

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>really not something you do unless you're having a lot

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of issues on the revenue side and even on the

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>cost side. Well, but c LA say, this might be

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>an idiosyncratic issue, but it does sort of come at

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a time when on a broader level, research firms across

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>or research units I should say across Wall Street have

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>been cut significantly. And part of this has to do

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with new rules that are going to go into effect

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the third of January in two thousand eighteen that require

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>banks to charge investment firms for any research they provide them.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does this play into c LSA's decision at all? UM,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, Lisa from According to the CEO that UM,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Sloan UM Kathy Chan had talked with him and

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>he said, no, this is not a result of those rules,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>those my fed roles that you were talking about, UM,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this has nothing to do with those. What he said

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was that they want to really just you know, have

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>execution only framework in the US. That's what he said, UM,

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>And and really focus on those parts of the business.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Nothing to do with these new rules, although I will say,

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just on a broader level of competition for

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>research has been amped up in a pretty dramatic way,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with the worth of it being called into question. There

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>was a Financial Times article that came out over the

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>weekend talking about how different firms are bandying about what

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the costs scheme will be for this type of research,

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with some banks proposing ten thousand dollars a phone call

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>for with for for a chance to talk with their

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>senior analysts, um and and basically investment firms saying no way.

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's a huge departure from every which way that

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 1>they normally have conducted business. I mean, normally you have

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a big investor who can just call his his you know,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>his sales up, yes, but also his equity analyst and

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about ideas. You know, if he's I've even heard too.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're a dead investor, but you want

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit on equities, you copy your

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>your debt representative, maybe the analysts on that side, and

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>he can bring in the conversation for you a sell

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>side person on the equity side. So it's a charge

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>for that conversation. I mean, I'm just not sure what

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of mechanism you start to get into. And I

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>mean it's almost like billable hours for lawyers or something.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Certainly seems that way. Thank you very much, Laura Keller,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>financial reporter for Bloomberg. You've been keeping us up to

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>date on this story and of course the ongoing changes

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>to equity research. Before I buy any mobile device, I

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>check in with one person, John Butler. He's our senior

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Telecom Services and Equipment analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He provides

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>unique and real time research for the telecoms industry, and

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he's here in the studio joining us. Now. Thanks very much.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Well that's great, Gray of different phones in front of him. Well,

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he wishes, he wish he's getting as many as pim. Right. Well,

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go there. That's not let's not talk

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about those problems. UM, I want you to talk about

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Mobile World Congress taking place in Barcelona. You say it's

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a zoo you go to CS Consumer Electronics show in

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. Uh. I was reading the reports from Barcelona,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that Nokia was the one that grabbed

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the head lines for something that I frankly did not

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>expect they really did. They're not even making handsets anymore.

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>They actually have a partnership with HMD, which is a

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>longtime partner there is, and they're manufacturing the phone and

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>licensing the brand. And they came out with the old

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>candy bar that the thirty three ten has been updated,

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>complete with the popular game Snake if you remember that

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>one from back in two thousand is when that was

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>originally launched. Yes, and it sold over a hundred and

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million units, which back then was really a

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>big deal. So it was a huge hit. Everyone who

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>had had wireless service at that point at least considered

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>buying one if they didn't known one. So the Nokia

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty three ten is back, it's updated, it's got a

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>color screen. But it's why you think I can I

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think people are you know, if you look at even

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>TV these days, a lot of there's a lot of

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>retro stuff showing up, and I think it's sort of

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>playing into that trend. But I for Nokia, I really

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's about reminding people that the brand is back,

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>so they I mean, this is not a smartphone. No,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually I don't know what the price is they

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>say it's going to be something under like it'll be

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it'll be two digits, not three. I'm certain of that.

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Um And they launched the Nokia three, five, and six

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>along with it, which are very moderately priced smartphones, and

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where they should play. The brand is

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>very popular, for example, in India, it's a huge brand there.

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>So coming out with a reminder of hey, we're back, uh,

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of welling up those warm memories of

0:23:53.680 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the Nokia brand with the three tum But let's a

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Apple, because they're going to be having

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>their investor meet egg and we just found out about

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett's newfound love of Apple and his newfound share

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>or ownership of Apple has increased. Do you expect that

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to be something that Apple is talked is asked about,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or even volunteers. You know, they may talk about the

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.719
<v Speaker 1>fact that team really is a big year for Apple.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's an anniversary year for the iPhone. What tends to

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>spark upgrades in the in smartphones in general, something really

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>an innovative new feature. So we saw it with the

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>iPhone sex for example, the first large screen iPhone, and

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that generated what can best be described as sort of

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a sales super cycle, and I think the hope is

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>building that this year we're going to see a move

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to a brighter screen technology called oh Lead, and we're

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>going to see true waterproofing with the iPhone and a

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>better on the front and the back. So there's a

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>lot that's being talked about. Uh, they have room to innovate,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, I think it could really be

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a big year for them, So fingers crossed, and I

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think that will come up in the shareholders meeting. I

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to figure out how to get those

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Year buds made in scale so that people can actually

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>listen to the phone with I'll happen to be use

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>an adapter because they got rid of the uh you know,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the imp the sound output, the air phone jack. Yeah.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>That actually, of all decisions they've made over the years,

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that one really lets my head. Yeah, I don't get it.

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, the move to wireless technology and

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>headphones and other accessories is definitely a trend that's in place,

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really mature enough at this point in

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>my mind to have done away with the Year phone jack.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But it is gone on the iPhone, seven, and uh,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, my hope is that they come out with

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 1>lower cost alternatives than those wireless ear buds, which are

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>a hundred. What I was very excited about hearing is

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>that Apple may cut the charging chord completely with the

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>iPhone eight. That's the rumor sort of circulating right now, right, Yeah, yeah,

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there are better than the earbuds, I mean wireless technology,

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>charging technology. It's I mean one of these new things,

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they always come with with some downside. Just quickly, John,

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I just went back. We got to go back to

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>this Nokia thing because I found out it's about fifty

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>two bucks for the Nocchia thirty three ten. Now it's

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two hours talk time a month long on standby,

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>available in warm red, yellow gloss finished dark blue, and gray,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>both with Matt finish, and it supports two point five

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>G network technology, which is ancient technology. But my point is,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>how many people you think are going to buy this

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>as a fashion access for I mean, this is almost

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>disposable at fifty two bucks. Yeah, I actually that's a

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>good question. But I think they're really aiming for emerging markets,

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to be honest. Yeah, India, Well, hm d Ye, thanks

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for well, we'll be, we'll be, we'll be heeping tabs

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on him's budding career as a an advocate for the

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Nokia Phones. John Butler, thank you so much for joining us.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Always a pleasure of senior telecom services and equipment analysts

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 1>talking about Apple's annual shareholder meeting and also uh the

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Mobile World Congress with Nokia's new phone. Thanks for listening

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm out there on

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You can always

0:27:50.200 --> 0:28:01.239
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. P and L has

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by proper Cloth, a leader in men's

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>custom shirts with proprietary smart sized technology and top rated

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>customer service. Ordering a custom shirt has never been easier.

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Visit proper cloth dot com to order your first custom

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>shirt today.