WEBVTT - Reeves' Heathrow-Fueled Growth Plan, DeepSeek and the Effect on US Big Tech, and Mini-Bubbles are Bubblin'

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. Welcome to the Merin

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Trugs Money Weekly round Up, our debrief on the biggest

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>stories in markets and economics. I'm Merin Zumzet, Web Editor

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at Large for Bloomberg UK Wealth.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>And I'm joint therapey, author of the Money Distilled newsletter

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and senior reporter for Bloomberg.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 3>Excellent, John, your Scottish?

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, can you tell?

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And you said to me the other day that I

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was the token Scott in the run, but kind of

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 3>You're You're the actual Scott in the run.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>So you will have noticed that a court has just

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>ruled that the consent for two new Scottish oil and

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>gasfield has been granted unlawfully and their owners must seek

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fresh approval from the UK government before product you can begin.

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And I thought I would just mention that because we're

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about a couple of things today, and

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the first thing we're going to talk about is Rachel

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Reeves and her drive for growth, because it is her mission, her.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Drive for growth.

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And then we're going to talk about deep seek and

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the US dot market and AI a little bit. But

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I just thought a fabulous introduction to talking about who

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we now call poor Rachel Reeves is this fact that

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>every way a government turns, there's a court there, often

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>with Greenpeace behind it, say actually, no, you can't.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>And do you remember poor Rachel? Last week she said?

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>The answer can't always be no. She said that Davil

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't she Well, you know what, Rachel, The answer always

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is no.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 3>What's she going to do about it? What is she

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>going to do about it? John?

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Normally I would feel that it's not necessarily a good

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>thing you have a lawyer as a prime minister. But

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm starting to feel that maybe that is the kind

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>of wine great sport about Kirstana's being the prime minister.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like the level of I mean, people call it

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 2>judicial activism, and I get that. But the only reason

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>that this stuff can happen is because a politician passed

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot at some point in the past that Noney

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>has quite noticed the repercussions of at the time. So

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 2>we need, we do need to do something about this.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 2>It shouldn't really be up to a small pressure group

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 2>bringing i mean quite a fringe kind of case that

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>can then shut down something that the democratically elected government

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>has already approved. This isn't okay. Actually the course of

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>going too far. There's a lot of examples of this

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of stuff and it needs to stop. Unfortunately, I'm

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 2>not a lawyer, nor a politician, not someone who is

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>deeping the weeds on this stuff, so I don't know

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>how this has come about, but we need to get idiot.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>It just needs to end because it's not acceptable we

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 2>have this kind of thing continuously stopping is from getting in.

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 3>It's absurd.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at the I'm just going to

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>say before we start here, hate mail directly to John

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not me, right, because he's Scottish, so probably he was

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the one who wanted these oil fields in the first place.

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Not me totally, but yes.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>But the case is we talked about Aberdeen last week,

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't we. But the cases were bought by two environmental

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>campaigning groups, and Greenpeace obviously and another one called Uplift.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And I haven't done this yet, but I'm pretty sure

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that if we check where the cash that goes to

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Uplift and Greenpeace comes from, we'll find that quite a

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of it comes one way or another via our

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>tax contributions.

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>So we are caught in this ridiculous situation.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>By time after time after time you find the government

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>thoughted by government taxpayer financed organizations, and this.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:43.119
<v Speaker 3>Is what we have here.

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're a fifty seven page judgment where the judge

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>said there's a public interest in having the decision remade

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on a lawful basis because of the effects of climate change,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>which you said outweighed the interests of developers. Of course,

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe something like this, the Rosemanck oilfield and

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the jack Door gasfield. Rose is a bit north of

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Shetland and Jackdaw is a bit too, the east of Aberdeen.

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say this isn't just about the interest of

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the developers. It's about the interests of the ordinary, ordinary

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>population of the UK and their living standards. But hey,

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that's just me. Anyway, onto Rachel Rage and all the

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>other things that she isn't going to be able to

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>get done.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>There's the Heathrow runway, right, yeah.

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean if she can't get a couple of oil

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>fields opened, then I do wonder. I mean, Rachel Reaves

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>was actually on Bloomberg Telly and she said that she

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 2>wants speeds to be in the ground by the end

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>of this parliament and I mean, the normal circumstances tell

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 2>me that you're going to start on an extension in

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>four years time would seem like a long time, but

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 2>that seems miraculously fast for you know, an extra kind

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>of runway that's already been delayed by you know, countless

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>times over various legal challenges, and you know, and obviously

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>you've already got side Can saying that he's definitely going

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to take it to court. So I am going to

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 2>be interested to see how this happens.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>He's going to take it to court. He's going to

0:04:58.200 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 3>take it to court, and he's going to.

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Use climate change legislation net zero all that stuff, and

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>he's going to have green Place and Uplift with him.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And once again, this is how low fair is used

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the UK to for the government.

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, let's say one thing that I am

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>interested in, and you know, obviously made an awful lot

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>of criticisms of the government and the decisions that it's made,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 2>but I am curious to see if someone who is

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 2>as presumably versed in law fare and this way of

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 2>doing things as Kirstarmer presumably is, has got a way

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>to counteract it. Now that he's the one that's you know,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>taking the flag from it. I am hoping that if

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>nothing else comes about, we will see a pushback against

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 2>this basically governance via the courts. But you're right the

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 2>other thing and also also getting ready gift aid, gift

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>aid needs to stop, you know.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>All of this kind of get rid of gifted.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Garridy, gifted. You've been saying it for the ages. You know, anything,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>any any grant to any charity should be much more transpardoned.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in an idea world, I would say, don't

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>give any tax payer money to charities at.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 3>All, or whether every single.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Team is hinded it in fifty were saying that the

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 2>population nice to be for it or something like that,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 2>because this is just going beyond their jok.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>No grants to charities of any kind out of taxpayer money.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The government should do what the government should do. And

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>charities are outside the government, and I'm not sure that

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>any of them, any of them be it squirrels or greenpeace,

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>and should be financed by government, by taxpayer. The government

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>should you know, for phillip democratic mandate, which is to

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>do what the population wants, not to give money to

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>organizations that are doing things that the population might not

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want, which brings me very neatly to something that

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>I've been looking at this week. We haven't really finished

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>on growth. We'll come back to growth. But this is connected.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Over half of gen Z.

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I can never remember which gens which, but let's say

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>young people, over half of gen Z wants to the

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>UK to become a dictatorship. Now, why do they want

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the UK to become a dictatorship. There's all sorts of

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>theories out there, but I can't answer that for you.

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It's because they would like to see something, just something, anything,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>get done.

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>They see the.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Electorate going out them voting again and again and again.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Build stuff, do stuff, make a smaller state, have lower taxes,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>reduce immigration, whatever it is people vote for over and over.

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>These things never happen. Nothing anybody votes for ever happens.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So they think to themselves, well, if anything's ever going

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to get done, maybe we should just have a dictator.

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Hey, maybe the stuff that gets.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Done won't be what we want, but something will happen.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you think that's it.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's probably an element of them wanting a

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>better drama in the lives. Yeah, I mean, obviously we

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>all of these, said SVIs, I'd take me a massive

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>pinch of salt, because I don't I don't think the

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>more I mean generations said, this is the generation that's

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 2>actually older than old kids, but younger than the millennials.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>So I know, twenties.

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh, they're really difficult ones, aren't they.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're kind of like they are kind of yeah,

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean the other interesting things. I mean, you know,

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe maybe it's just not true, but people say about

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 2>young people getting more being more left wing, they're just

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>want the opposite of what they've got.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, well, it depends what they want to communist dictator

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or right wing to dictator. I mean, no one said them,

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>No one said, did they want a fascist or a communist?

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they didn't get the right choices, I guess.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know whether they're extreme left or extreme right,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or if they yet know that extreme left and extreme

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>right are the same thing.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they don't know that yet. The young they may not.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>And also, I don't know, they've got a lot I'm

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 2>not sure that they I'm not sure left and right

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of sense anymore. I think I think

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>whenever I think about all of the things that are

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>going on. You can basically split any people who are

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 2>still pro something resembling progress and that kind of and

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>that kind of degrow with anti growth nihilism on the

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 2>other side. And did those two things, And I think

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 2>that then makes a little bit more sense of the

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>voting for a dictatorship element, because that's quite a nihilistic

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 2>way look at things on nihilistic and I'm never prety

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 2>sure you pronounced that. So I think that that then

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 2>makes more sense than them thinking about I don't think

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>they're thinking, you know, a woint, a stylin or a woint.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>They're thinking, A want somebody who's going to set my

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>enemies whoever they are straight, if you know what I mean,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean they want a dictators on their said, yeah, I.

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Suspect it's more it's more about or it's a lot

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>about the absolute lack of growth over the last couple

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>of decades. So you have an entire generation here that

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>they've never really experienced the growth, the innovation, the creativity, etcetera.

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>That leads to sustained economic growth that you and I

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>saw when we were young.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So we maybe have more of a growth.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Mindset, as they now say in the school's growth mindset,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and I that growth is the default that it's possible,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that it should be, that things should be improving.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 3>And getting better all the time.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And therefore the idea that wealth should constantly be redistributed

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessary because the pie is growing. Whereas if you

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>are perhaps generations, that your default belief, which is entirely reasonable,

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is that the pie isn't growing, and crucially that, particularly

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>with poor Rachel in charge, it isn't going to grow.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 3>So what you need is a.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>More extreme level of redistribution than democracy will allow. So

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get growth, and you don't get living

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>standards growing, again, what is it that you would expect

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>except for maybe this?

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's yeah, that's really true. And I

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>do forget that we grew up in the nineties and

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the nineties were very much everything did to keep getting

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>up particuli at your political level.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>We had great jobs, we could have you know, we

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>were educated for free, We had great jobs, we could

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>afford houses. You know, we have children, we had them

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>at a reasonable age, et cetera, et cetera. A lot

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things that people stuck in a no growth

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>mindset and a no growth assumption find very hard to

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>think that they will ever have, So I totally understand this,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>But I've gone off topic again. This is not that

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of podcast. So let's I think we've talked quite

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the past on this podcast about what

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Reeves could do to allow growth rather than to

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>pretend that she can create growth. So I would suggest

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>anyone who wants to hear a little more about that

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the podcast that we did with Simon French,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>which was excellent on all that, the main thing being that.

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>If Rachel really believes that growth.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Is a fight, she's fighting the wrong thing. You know,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't need to fight. She needs to get out

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of the way. Less fighting, less fighting, and less of

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>course you are fighting the course, which he's going to

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be doing for a while. Onto something, John, Onto something

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that you've written about a lot this week and which

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we already released what we don't call an emergency podcast

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>but we call an early podcast on Tuesday. AI Deep

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Seek and the effect on the US technology sector. Are

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you in the camp that says deep Seek It's great.

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Everything just goes better for US tech as a result

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of Deep Seek, and we should all buy more and

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>more in video or are you in the camp that says, oh, look,

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>China one, this stuff can be done cheaply and easily

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with low energy. Therefore, no one wants to own a

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>video chips anymore. It's all over for them, and it's

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>all over everyone who's spent billions and billions and billions

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>on building or attempting to build an AI infrastructure that

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it's already needed. Oh, and could buy

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>nuclear energy at the same time. Oh, you could be

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the middle. I guess, But those are the

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>two camps, right.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Don't think I mean I that camp, and I think

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>the only count I'm actually in is more that this

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>has remainded people, That unexpected stuff throws spinals in the

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 2>walks all the team and the one the mental problem

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>here has been the AI bubble. I feel like, let's

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>call it the AI bubble has been massively overinflated. So

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>stocks are very overvalued compared to anything but the most

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>perfect event unfolding. And the one thing that Deepseek shows

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>is that you don't know the future paths. You can't

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 2>assume that it's going to be perfect, and you can't

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 2>assume that in the video is going to be the

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 2>only contender for the rest of eternity, and therefore probably

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>there should be a little more room for uncertainty in

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the price, which means that the current price, or the

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>price you know, a couple of days ago, was probably

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>not the right price. And I think that's about the

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 2>only useful thing that especially, I mean anno specialist like me,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>but even you know, the specialists unfortunate. If you're a

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>non specialist, you don't know the details we are talking about.

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a specialist, you're two way far too

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>into the details to be able to give a decent

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>big picture look. So I think that, yeah, I mean,

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that's it. I think all we knew before,

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 2>for almost sure, was that these thoughts were overvalued. And

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>this is a remainder why they were overvalues, because they

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>were placing and perfection rather than anything else.

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>My takes would be that one exactly never pay for

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>perfect because you're never going to get perfect. And you know,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the dynamic of of all of history is that some

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>technology that looks expensive and difficult is always disrupted by

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>someone who can do it at a fraction of the cost,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>where a fraction of the effort happens every single time.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>That would be my first takeaway. The second one would

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be the weirdness of I don't know when when you

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and I were reading all the stuff about Davos, where

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we weren't by the way, you know, a lot of

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the talk at Davos was about deep seek, right, this

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>was new information. It had been out there before, but

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it only hit the stock market on Monday. That was

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because everyone's at worst talking about how there

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market gets hold of information before anybody

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>else and it's a perfect waging machine.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>E cetera, et cetera.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>But actually it was a long time in market terms

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for the information about deep seek and what it could

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>do and how it had been trained to do it

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to move from DeVos chatter to the market. Information doesn't

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>matter until suddenly it really mattered. That's also I thought

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Yeah, that from the non expert point of view,

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>cheap AI might not be good for big tech, and

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>might not be good for anyone who's just promised to

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>check one hundred billion into Donald Trump's AI infrastructure ideas.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not good for that, but really good surely for

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>productivity across the board, which brings us back to poor

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Reeves and her desperation to create growth. But she

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>might not necessarily have to do that. But she can't

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>do that, but she might be able to step back

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and just say, well, hang on, if cheap AI is

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out there and it's going to make its way round

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy without her having to do anything, that could

0:15:55.760 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be conceivably a huge cheap productivity boat boost will give

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>us growth anyway, not just here but in the US

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of course as well. And then we have the classic

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>situation where you have a bubble, massive capex bubble. You

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>have the creation of the technology of some kind or another.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You have a product productivity boom, but we don't actually

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>see any profitability to the big companies. You may have

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>developed the technology in the first place for a good decade,

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like well, like the Internet, like railways, all.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 3>This kind of thing.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm amusing myself at the moment looking at mini bubbles,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the AI bubble fits perfectly into the

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dynamic of a mini bubble right above a sector bubble

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>inside a market.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I mean's this it's one of those. It's

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>like a productive bubble. So like the entern they ultimately

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>boys our productive bubble and the minute boss that I

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>actually didn't cause that much damage. It's only when you've

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>get stuff like properly that you've got a real problem.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I mean, the the I thing I

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 2>do find fascinating then you know, I mean, obviously if

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>they've found the way they do chat GP, but like

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, one hundredfold cheaper, it's then that's that's great.

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 2>That's like, you know, that's fantastic. It's very hard to

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>say that's a bad thing. My going back to Rachel

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Reeves and growth. The one issue that I have and

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 2>just to be clear, I'm not an AI skeptic. I

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>can see that it's useful for stuff, but the sorts

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 2>of things that it would be really useful for, like

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the kind of you know, AI and medicine, AI and law.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I can see that sort of stuff being kind of

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>held up by you know, the guilds, if you like,

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in those areas the human element rather than the technological element.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 2>And I think that is again that's sort of is

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like what we've been talking about earlier.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 2>We you know, the kind of battle against the courts

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>to actually get anything done. It's not that we can't

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 2>do any of this stuff. Is that if you like,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the kind of social structures around them are stopping is

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's highly qualified lawyers and highly qualified doctors

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to want to introduce you know, it can

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 2>have EI and the workflow for the same reason the

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 2>printer was back when the print and unions were around.

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Didn't want desktop publishing software coming in and getting over

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that is going to be difficult. I think maybe I'm wrong, Yeah, just.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 3>The misery guts.

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm much more optimistic about it.

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>It's true.

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think ai AI is one of those things that

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>can kind of, you know, creep creep through the system

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>without being noticed in quite that way.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 3>But we will see.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>As you say, neither neither of us are proper experts

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>here anyway that I want to go back if you

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>don't mind. Two mini bubbles sector bubbles inside markets, okay,

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we have a we've collected a lot over

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the years, the Great Diving Bell bubble and you know

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. I've got a new one I've

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>been looking at, which was the listed nursing home company bubble,

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the Fevered fifty they were called. That was a bubble

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>in the late sixties and early seventies. Wow, you know,

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously there was a lot of all sorts of regulatory change.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>That meant that people started manically building nursing homes and

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they would list them before they'd finished the construction, all

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. There were only a couple listed

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty six. By nineteen seventy there were ninety,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly the bottom fell out completely in nineteen

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy one. There was a big fraud case. Of course,

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>there's always a big fraud case, and that meant that

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone started going, whoa, whoa, whoa. We we can't return

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of twenty percent a year and you've got that much done.

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>You haven't even built the nursing home yet. Over the

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>collapse anyway, talking to someone about this the other day,

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and he said to me, had I ever heard of

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the great cryonics bubble crygenics bubble?

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Come?

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I cannot find anything about this on the

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>internet anywhere, not even with the little use of AI.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is a call out to our listeners. Does

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody know anything about the cryonics bubble or the cryogenics bubble,

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>depending on what you call it, which I understand happened

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in the early eighties, when there was a great boom

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>in the technology of freezing people's heads or freezing people's

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>bodies to wake them up. Later on various scandals where

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>bodies turned out not we've been frozen after all, people

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>turning the electricity off at night, this kind of thing,

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and then this mini bubble crash. But I can find

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing about it. Anybody knows anything about this bubble, or

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>indeed has another favorite mini bubble they'd like to tell

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>us about.

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 3>Please do get in touch. Was that in the US?

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's really interesting. I have no idea.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's really interesting. But I have asked.

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I have asked our two favorite financial historians. I've asked

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Russell Napier and I've asked Eddie Chancellor. I've asked both

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of them if they know of the freezing people's body's bubble.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>And as I thought, what we are scooped, I mean,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that would be tough to end up. We could have

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 2>some of these heads in the Library of mistakes. That

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>would be great.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>That It's not where I was expecting the conversation to go.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But yes, we could indeed have a defrosted body in

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the Library of mistakes. I mean, the problem John of

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>course is you know, and the reason why all these

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>companies go wrong is because it's really really expensive to

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>keep bodies frozen at an appropriate level so that you

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>can bring them back.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>To life later.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>It's very expensive, very high fixed costs things.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, you're not get brilliant cash flows from that

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 2>business side.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, each each body needs a permanent portfolio with it, right,

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So every time you take your body, it's like giving

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a house to the National Trust in the old days, right,

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you hand it over it and you have to give

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio for its upkeep at the same time.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Ah, you know what it would be like a different

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 2>benefit patient scheme exactly.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you were to be a successful cryonics company,

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>which clearly none of them were, you would also have

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a very expert manager of a permanent portfolio.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm guessing that these two skills don't normally go together.

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I think we need to end this podcast.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.719
<v Speaker 2>No, I was just saying, there's an opportunity here. Well,

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, active managers another ESG. That's kind of going away,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 2>I know, but this is your chance, you know, or

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>can like deep freeze deep frees of clients the cleogenic portfolio.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>So there's something going on here.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll come back to this one. We'll come

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 3>back to this one. Let's lets see if we can

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 3>find a couple of.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Fund managers who would tell us how they would run

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a permanent portfolio designed to finance the cost of keeping

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the original client's body frozen in. Definitely anyone who'd like

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to be on that part. Also do get in touch.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Marrin Talks Money debrief.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>If you like our show, rate review, and subscribe wherever

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts. Also be sure to follow me

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>in John on ex or Twitter at marinas w and

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>John Underscore Stepic. This episode was produced by Summersidi and

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Moses and Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer. Question

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and comments on this show and I think there might

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be a lot and all our shows always welcome. Our

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>show email is Merrin Money at Bloomberg dot net.