WEBVTT - Why Mortgage Rates Went Up After the Fed's Big Cut

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Odd Blots listeners, Joe and I have something very

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>exciting to share with you. We are going to be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>hosting a live recording of the podcast on the Lower

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>East Side of New York at Caveat. We're doing it

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on November fourth, That is, of course, the night before

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the big US election, So join us for an evening

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of policy, discussion, trade, all that good stuff. We're going

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to be hosting Brad Setzer from the Council on Foreign Relations,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and we'll also have some surprise guests for you as well.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So you can find the link to buy tickets in

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>our new daily Audlots newsletter or on social media, where

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>no doubt Joe and I will be talking about it

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot, so definitely come join us November fourth at

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Caveat on the Lower east Side.

0:00:52.800 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway.

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe, have you noticed mortgage rates recently?

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they've been up. In fact, we're recording this October sixteenth,

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 3>mortgage rates have been rising and in the last couple

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 3>of weeks, mortgage applications according to new data out today,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 3>have been down, REFI applications have been down, and of

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>course it's all ironic because we got that rate cut.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. So benchmark rates have been cut by

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points, so we've moved to like five percent

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>from the five point five percent on the upper bound

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that happened on September eighteenth. But since then, as you

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>point out, mortgage rates have actually gone up. So I

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think we've moved from like six point six percent on

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the thirty year to something like six point nine percent

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>as we're recording the we were very close to seven

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>percent last week, and just intuitively, that is not what

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you would expect to see happen when benchmark rates are

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>getting cut.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, I don't want to ever insult fellow colleague,

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 3>or not colleagues, but other people in the media and

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 3>actually have no basis for this. But in my mind,

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>there are a bunch of explainers out there on the internet,

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 3>is like, what do FED rate cuts mean for you?

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>And someone put a bullet in there that said, oh,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 3>they mean lower mortgage rates and stuff like that, And

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>obviously there's a connection between FED rates and what people

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 3>pay for a thirty year fixed rate mortgage or some

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>other flavor of mortgage. But it's clearly not there's reasons

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>why it's not one to one, and there's nothing mechanical

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 3>about the day the FED cuts rates that suddenly borrowing

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 3>costs for homeowners drop.

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. And this actually came up in our

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>interview with Chicago Fed President Austin Goolsby talking about what

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is the impact of rate cuts on the overall economy

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and talked about how everyone has a fixed rate mortgage

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>now and so that doesn't necessarily feed through, but I

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>guess it does pose some existential questions for monetary policy transmission.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Like if the benchmark rate was a person, it would

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be that guy like pointing at himself in the mirror,

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>criticizing his own irrelevance. I guess anyway, interesting, that's interesting.

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't sure we were going with it, but that's interesting.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That's just what springs to mind.

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>You know what I don't get. I mean, I kind

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>of get it because we've done episodes on mortgages, but

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 3>like most mortgages in this country are backed by the

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>US government or Fany and Freddy implicitly and now more

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>or less explicitly like, why can't we all just get

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 3>mortgages at like the ten year rate for the thirty rate?

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, Like, seriously, if the government can borrow at

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the thirty or rate and the government is backstopping it,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 3>why don't we just all get those same prices for

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>a mortgage. I know there's reasons, but still I'm not

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I need to be reminded what they are.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So this episode is going to be all about

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>why Joe can't get a mortgage at four percent a

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>ten year rate. We are going to answer that question,

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very happy to say we do, in fact

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have the perfect guest for this episode. We're going to

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with Tom Graff. He is the CIO of Facet,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a financial planning firm currently has four billion

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars under management. But perhaps more importantly for the subject,

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>he was a bond portfolio manager for many, many years,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and when he started out in finance, he was actually

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>in mortgage bond. So he's gonna walk us through the

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of mortgage bond ecosystem and all the maths that

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>goes into producing the final rate.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait. I followed Tom on Twitter for a

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>long time. One of my favorite follows, so I'm really

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 3>excited to actra pt.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we finally got him on. Perfect guest for the

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect topic. Okay, Tom, thank you so much for coming

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on a lots.

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me, guys, big fan of the show.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 4>Glad to finally be on.

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of alluded to it in the intro,

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But why don't you give us a rundown of your expertise?

0:04:58.160 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Why are we talking to you?

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, securities and yeah, So, as you mentioned, my first

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 4>job as analyst, I was a mortgage bond analyst, so

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 4>traded mortgages, analyzed mortgage decided what went in the portfolio,

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 4>that sort of thing. Then I graduated being a portfolio

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 4>manager and I ran a general bond fund but also

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 4>ran a mortgage specific fund which was a five star

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 4>fund for a while. And now I'm at FACET. I'm

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm the chief investment officer. I oversee all things investment,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 4>but as a planning firm, we're on the other side.

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Now we're helping people decide, well, it's now the right

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 4>time to refinance, now the right time to buy a house,

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 4>that sort of thing. So I've kind of seen mortgages

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 4>from all angles and I've been at this twenty five years,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:37.679
<v Speaker 4>so I've seen a lot happen over that time.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 3>So we're gonna really dive deep into this. But big picture,

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 3>I actually I don't want to get too much into

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 3>the details on the podcast, but I actually have to

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 3>refinance a mortgage in a couple of years. I could

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 3>do it today, I guess, but I have to do

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>it at some point. All right, government thirty year yields

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 3>are four point three percent four point three to two

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 3>percent as we're talking right now. I'll probably want to

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 3>get a thirty year fixed. Why can't I just borrow

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 3>at four point three two percent if the government is

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 3>already backstopping.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, So, the key difference between a mortgage bond and

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 4>a treasury bond is that in the United States, virtually

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 4>all mortgages, and all the ones that Fannie Maine frendimack back,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 4>can be refinanced at any time without any penalty.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Can I just promise not to, I guess, because I

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 3>can always sell the house or something like that.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, you can't do that, Joe. And so from

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 4>an investor perspective, right, what that means is if interest

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 4>rates rise, no one refinances. Everyone just stays where they are.

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Witness all the people kind of stuck in two and

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>a half three percent mortgages right now, right, and so

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 4>those mortgages just stay outstanding, and they might stay out

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 4>standing for thirty years for all we know, right, Whereas

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 4>if interest rates fall, you kind of don't get any

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 4>of the benefits. So if I buy a thirty year

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 4>treasury and interest rates drop, I could make ten, fifteen

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 4>to twenty percent price appreciation as that happens. But in

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 4>a mortgage bond, if interest rates fall, every just refinances.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 4>I just get all my money back at par I'm

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 4>no better off. And so you got to get paid

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 4>for that what we'll get into it, but what's called

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.119
<v Speaker 4>negative condexity. You've got to get paid for that risk.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 4>And that's why there's a spread between mortgage bonds and

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 4>treasury bonds.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 3>That was perfect, I get it now.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So who is actually buying mortgage bonds? Because I think

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this is going to feed into the discussion of the

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>spread the yield difference between the tenure and something like

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the thirty year mortgage rate. Who's buying?

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So it's kind of everybody that plays in the

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 4>bond market, but particularly those that play in the high

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 4>high quality part. So, as you mentioned, Joe, this whole

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 4>market is more or less government backed, and so kind

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>of the same buyers we're buying a lot of treasury

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 4>bonds are probably buying a lot of mortgage bonds, So

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 4>that particularly goes to banks and financial institutions. They get

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 4>favorable capital treatment versus corporate bonds or something else, so

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of the highest yielding thing they can buy

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 4>that has good capital treatment. And then money managers are

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 4>certainly buying, particularly ones that are focused on kind of

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>a general bond benchmarket. It's about thirty percent of the

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg aggregate. And then you also have a lot of

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 4>mortgage rates, so it's an acid that's easy to leverage,

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 4>and so there's a lot of players there as well.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Tracy, I heard a rumor, and I can't say any

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be very vague about this, but I

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 3>recently heard a rumor that there was some sort of

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 3>a meeting and there were a lot of economists there,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and I can't say any more details about what it was,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>but that actually there is still a widespread misconception, even

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>among professionals who should know, this perception that banks have

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>gotten out of the mortgage space that after two thousand

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 3>and eight, two thousand and nine, it all sort of

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 3>went to what you know, people call non bank lenders

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 3>or other asset managers, et cetera. But banks, according to

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying, are still huge holders of mortgages. And

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 3>then I guess what's going on with bank balance sheets

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 3>et cetera? Really do match?

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe? That is so cryptic. You make it sound like

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you were at Builderberg or something like some big, top

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>secret meeting.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to say anymore. This was third hand. Well,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 3>it's an answer you question. I'm not going to insulting anyone.

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 3>No one can hear this and oh this was me,

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 3>But I'll tell you that I.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Don't know what Yeah, no one, with no comment on

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>what Joe might be getting into in his off hours. Yeah. Look,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 4>I think banks have always been big players. Now the

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 4>degree to which they buy depends on a lot of things.

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 4>So what else could they do with that capital? Is

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 4>there are more efficient ways to use that capital, And

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 4>in particular right now, the fact that the yield curve

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 4>is so flat does make it a little tricky. Right,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 4>So banks their whole game is get in capital at

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 4>deposit rates, right, and you guys have done a couple

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 4>of shows on how deposit rates have been rising. And

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 4>then buy something, you know, whether it's lending or securities

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 4>that yield more, and the closer those are, the less

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 4>that makes sense, and mortgages there's higher yielding things they

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 4>could do. So making a normal commercial and industrial loan

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 4>is going to have a higher yield. And so I

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 4>think it a flatter curve, just a little trickier for

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 4>banks be big buyers. But still in the scheme of things,

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 4>there's still big players in the mortgage market for sure.

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about what goes into producing a

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rate. So if I want to buy a house,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and I go to a bank and I ask for

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage, what are the individual factors that go into

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the number that eventually gets quoted back to me?

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Yeah, So let's assume for sake of argument, this

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>is alone that conforms to Fanny and Freddy's standards, because

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 4>that's the ones we're talking about here. Okay, So assuming that, right,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 4>your bank has to pay Fanny or Freddy a guarantee fee. Okay,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 4>So that is gfee, the GFI exactly, and that is

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>based on your credit situation, so how much you're putting down,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 4>what your credit score is, that sort of thing. But

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 4>it's all algorithmics, so they're just typing into a computer

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>or fanning Freddy's kicking back, here's the rate. Right. Then

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 4>they're also going to think to themselves, okay, well where

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 4>can I sell this mortgage?

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 4>What price am I going to get when I sell

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 4>it in the open market? And that depends mostly on

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 4>just what the general price is for the going rate

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 4>for mortgages, but it might depend a little on your situation.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 4>So we can get into it how certain kinds of

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 4>mortgages command a bit more of a premium in the

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 4>market than others, and that will go in to the

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 4>rate you're gonna get quoted. And so every night the

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>bank's mortgage desk is sort of plugging in, hey for more.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 4>It's like this, we'll offer this rate from words like that,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 4>we're off this right, and all these factors are going

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 4>into that. So when your loan officers typing this into

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 4>his computer, that's what's spitting out right.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Actually, let's back up what makes a mortgage conforming versus

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 3>non conforming.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 4>The biggest thing is the price. Okay, So the price

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 4>relative to used to be a hard number, but now

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Fanny and Freddy do it relative to your sort of

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 4>MSA or your area.

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 3>So wait, above a certain price, can you go into

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 3>that a little further above a certain price? Fanny and

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Freddy just want.

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're just not backing it, and that has to

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 4>do with their mandate from Congress to be about affordable housing.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 3>God, yeah, got.

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So you outlined what happens when we go to a

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>bank and we get a mortgage. What happens in the

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>sales process, So that mortgage eventually gets sold on the

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>open market. As you said, how does it get sold?

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Right? So, the bank's going to pool together a number

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 4>of mortgages, and by a number, I mean kind of

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 4>any number. You can have a dozen mortgages in a pool.

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 4>You could have one hundred thousand mortgages in a pool.

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 4>And so they'll but they'll pull them together. What they're

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 4>going to try to do is just get best execution,

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>like any other trade that you do in any other market. Right,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 4>And the way they're going to get best execution is

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 4>by grouping the loans together that command a premium. All right,

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 4>So let me give it for instance, it is apropos

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 4>to Joe's refinancing situation. If you're in New York, if

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 4>you have a pool that's all New York loans, that's

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 4>going to get a premium. And the reason is because

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 4>in New York, this transfer tax makes refinancing more expensive

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 4>for a New Yorker. So New York loans refinanced slower

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 4>than all the other loans. And so what we call

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 4>that in the mortgage business call protection. So if for

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 4>every basis point decline in rates, a New York loan

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 4>is gonna pay a little slower, and that tends to

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 4>be advantageous to the investors. So they're gonna take all

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 4>If they've got thirty New York loans and thirty Oklahoma loans,

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 4>they're not gonna pull them together because that would waste

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 4>their money. They're gonna put all the New York loans

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 4>in one loan and get a premium for those, and

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 4>just sell all of the Oklahoma ones at the at

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 4>the kind of generic.

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, that's interesting. So if I'm a buyer, I pay

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more for New York loans because of

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 3>that less sensitivity the REFI you know, I was thinking,

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 3>so again, I'm not trying to get too into my

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 3>personal finances, but I remember around twenty twenty three and

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 3>mortgage rates hit eight percent, and a lot of things

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 3>that people were saying, including like mortgage brokers you call

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 3>you on the phone or whatever right after you enter

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 3>into some website like oh, don't worry about the high rates.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 3>You just refinanced in a few years. And I you know,

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm very emh brained. So I'm thinking like, well, if

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 3>everyone is already planning on refinancing in a few years,

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 3>then there probably is going to be the great refinance opportunity,

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 3>because not everyone can just take that free lunch, you know,

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 3>when it is eight percent and everyone's like, yeah, I'm

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 3>just going to refinance though in a few years, so

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>it'll be fine. Does that sort of like factor into

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the mouth of how much premium the buyer demand?

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I think it really did. And let me give

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 4>a very specific example. So right now, the spread between

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 4>the tenure Treasury and the mortgage rate is relatively large,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 4>and I'm talking about the investor rate and I'm talking

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 4>about the actual borrow rate you get at the bank,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 4>right and so there's a lot of discussion as to

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 4>why is that right, And it's been pretty sticky. It's

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 4>it's stayed unusually wide for a couple of years now,

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 4>and I think one of the reasons is what I

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 4>would call severe negative convexity. So negative convexity is this

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 4>idea I said earlier, where boy, if interest rates rise,

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't really get any benefit from buying mortgages, but

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 4>if instrates fall, I don't get any upside either, right,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 4>So that's this idea of negative vexity. Well, if you

0:14:55.120 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 4>have everybody laser focused on REFI opportunity, right, maybe the

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 4>kinds of people who never check on interest rates, right,

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 4>but all of a sudden they're like, I'm checking every day.

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 4>I want to know the moment if they're laser focused

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 4>on that and the moment they have any opportunity, they're

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 4>going to be right on it. Right. Well, that's a

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 4>different kind of negative condexity. I'm going to take my

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 4>bond that I own is going to refive faster than

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 4>it might otherwise at a time that people on mayor

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 4>may or may not be paying attention. Right. So, as

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 4>an investor, you just mentioned your your efficient markets billed. Yeah,

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 4>as an investor, I'm not unaware of that. Right, I'm thinking, boy,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 4>these things are going to pay like a bat out

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 4>of hell the moment interest rates drop even a little

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 4>and I need to get paid a little more for that.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Tracy. By the way, you and listeners right now should

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 3>go to Google Trends and look for a search of

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 3>the word no. Seriously is a great charge. Someone had

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 3>showed to me this a few.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Weeks discussing line goes up.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Look at the word Do a Google Trends search for

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the word refinancing, and you will see a big spike

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>on September eighteenth because it was you know, not everyone's

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>always paying attention to rates, But there's like one day

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>this year where the Fed actually made some pretty significant

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 3>news that sort of broke through the bubble, and you

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>could see how suddenly there were a bunch of people

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>paying attention to rates. Ironically, they didn't get any real

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>benefits automatically, but you could see how people don't pay attention.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 3>And then there's a day when someday they were.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>The futility of doing Google research. Everyone wants to refile

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>on that specific date and they can't get a lower

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>rate anyway. Tom I wanted to ask, what is the

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>ideal environment to be buying mortgages in because I think

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>back to the years after two thousand and eight when

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>interest rates were really low, and I remember big investors

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in mbs. They always complained, you know, they didn't want

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to get prepaid because then they would have all this

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>extra money that they would have to reinvest at lower rates.

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But now we're in the higher rate environment and they're

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>also complaining, So like, what is the ideal here?

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So one way to think about mortgage investing is

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 4>and I'm going to play on another odd lots theme here, please,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 4>It's a little like doing a covered call strategy in

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a stock all right. So what I've kind of done

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 4>is I bought a bond and I've also sold an

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 4>option to the borrower, and that option is to call

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 4>my bond away, right. And it's just like if I

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>buy Microsoft and I sell an option for someone to

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 4>buy Microsoft from me. It's exactly the same trade. And

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 4>if you think about that trade, right, what you want

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 4>is for Microsoft to do nothing, because if it goes down,

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 4>I've lost money. If it goes up, I get called away, right,

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 4>But if it does nothing, I just collect that premium

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 4>and I still have my stock. Right, So what you

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 4>want is for interest rates to stay very steady. Okay,

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 4>and nobody really gets to refinance. But I don't suffer

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 4>the downside that I suffer if interest rates rise, and

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 4>so mortgage is it's a tough It can be a

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 4>tough total return bond. So like if you think about

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 4>someone trying to trade it and play interest rates move around,

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 4>that's not that great. What it is is a good

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 4>income bond. So I buy it to collect this income.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 4>If interust rates can stay steady, it can be a

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 4>great bond to own.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>And this is why people call them pass throughs, right.

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, passive. The other thing people will say is

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 4>it can be a good defensive bond. So if you

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 4>think that corporate bonds are going to suffer because there's

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a recession, a lot of times people will

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 4>rotate into mortgage bonds because they're still yield there and

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 4>they're not as sensitive to that part of the cycle.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Usually when that happens, interest rates drop a lot and

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 4>you're not getting that upside and so I don't know,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 4>there's a tough space. It's a tough space.

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 3>Do Americans under refinance? I mean there must be some

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 3>population that doesn't pay attention. So I'm looking at you know,

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 3>mortgage rates in twenty ten, at one point December thirty first,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty ten, they're at four point nine to nine percent.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 3>They had gotten as low in twenty sixteen at three

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 3>point three percent. You know, I imagine in your covered

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 3>call strategy, anyone engaging in these things are very sophisticated

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and you call it right away. Is there an advance

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 3>for mortgage buyers sort of taking advantage of the fact

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 3>that the counterparty to this trade is not watching rates

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 3>all day?

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 4>No, for sure, that is true. So this concept in

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 4>mortgage trading called burnout, okay, and this is the idea

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 4>that at a certain point everyone who's going to refinance

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 4>has refinanced. Yeah, So if we rewind to twenty twenty,

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one, r ine traates were really low, you'd

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 4>still see five percent mortgages outstanding, and you'd be like, well,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 4>why what are they doing?

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Get on life right and not paying attention to an

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 3>interest rate right now?

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes they're just not paying attention. Sometimes they may maybe

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 4>something's happened with their credit and they can't get a

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 4>lower rate at this point, which you can get a

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 4>ton of detail on what the mortgage conditions were when

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 4>the bar were initiated the mortgage, but you don't know

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 4>that much about where they are in their life now, right.

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 4>You just really only know what happened when they applied.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 4>So you can get that. You can also get people

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 4>who are thinking about just paying off the loan and

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 4>they don't want to restart the clock. So if I've

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 4>been in this house for ten years and you're like,

0:19:58.560 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I know, I get a lower rate, but then I

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.959
<v Speaker 4>got to reset the clock, maybe a fifteen year more

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 4>you do a fifteen year old origion, but maybe that

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 4>monthly P and I is too much for me.

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 3>So there's something nice about just paying off a mortgage.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 4>And accutely, And that's a personal preference. Some people that's

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 4>what they want to do. Some people think that's a

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 4>bad financial idea, but I think it's up to you.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, that certainly happens, right, And so it's not

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 4>all just not paying attention, but it's not there's an

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 4>element of that for sure.

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to the spread between mortgage

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>rates and treasuries, which, as you pointed out, has been

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty wide in recent years. And I know You mentioned

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the negative convexity point, but do you see anything like

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>structural that's happened in the market that has led to

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that bigger spread.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, the flat curve they mentioned is part of it, right,

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 4>because there's a lot of players. Normally the arbitrage would

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 4>be hey, leveraged owners, which could be banks, but could

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 4>also be mortgage rates, other hedge funds. Anybody could come

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 4>in by the mortgage rate at this relatively high maybe

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 4>hedge it with treasuries and borrow in the repo market,

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 4>do that whole trade up. But it should work, right,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 4>But if the curve's pretty flat, then you need more

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 4>heeld to make it work, and all of a sudden

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 4>there's no arm there, right, So I think that's part

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 4>of it. I also think the fact that people see

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 4>the housing market as a little frozen right as part

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 4>of it, right, because there's so many people in one

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 4>part in very low rates they're kind of stuck there,

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 4>and there's people in very high rates they're kind of

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 4>like unable to refinance right now. So I think that's

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 4>part of it. I think that earlier I'm going to

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 4>go back to my call writing analogy. There's a vix

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 4>to the interest rate world. It's called the move index.

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 4>You can look at on by your terminal and you

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 4>can see that's relatively high. And that plays into how

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 4>people think about mortgages because if the volatility of interest

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 4>rates is relatively high, then the cost of the option

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 4>is relatively high, the cost of the options is relatively

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 4>then the mortgage rates can be relatively eye right. So

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 4>I think that all plays into it. In my opinion,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 4>the negative convexity bit is the most important one. The

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.239
<v Speaker 4>vall bit could improve as we get a little more

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 4>clarity on the FED if we stop whipping from oh,

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 4>if it's going to do eight cuts, No, they're going

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 4>to do two. If we could get into like, okay,

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 4>we kind of know the path here, then I think

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 4>that voll bit could come down. But and that might

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 4>be worth twenty twenty five basis points on the mortgage rate,

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 4>But I don't think we're in all the way to

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 4>more historic norms of like one hundred and fifty basis

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 4>points spread from treasuries to mortgages until we get a

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 4>little bit less negative convexity.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, by the way for tying the

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>move index to mortgage rates, because I'm actually writing about

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it in our newsletter today, the Odd Thoughts Newsletter now.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Daily Odd Launch newsletter used to be weekly. Go there

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 3>and sign up for it.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was my very eloquent plug for the newsletter. Okay, Tom,

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at what point does the spread like get wide enough

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that it does entice buyers into the market. Presumably they're

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>it must be like a level at which it does

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>become interesting. Or is it the case that it's just

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>never going to compete with something like, I don't know,

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a commercial mortgage or a high yield bond or something

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, I would say at the beginning part

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 4>of this year, mortgages became a really popular trade in

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 4>the money management business. So I'm just talking about regular

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 4>old bond funds. I heard a lot of people talking

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 4>up this trade, and the reasons were what you described.

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 4>They're like, look, the spreads are really wide. At that time,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 4>we were saying, you know, the Fed's done hiking, maybe

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 4>a cut's coming. Maybe that'll cause in straight vault to decline,

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 4>So there could be a spread compression opportunity here. I

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 4>think there was also an argument that there could be

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 4>some risk of corporate spreads widening corporate spreads were really tight,

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 4>and so relative to corporate spreads, mortgages were pretty attractive.

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 4>And mortgages have performed fine if it's not been a disaster,

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 4>but they've underperformed corporate bonds. And I think the problem

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 4>has been that this negative convexity issue is interest rates

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 4>have dropped, mortgages have just underperformed, and corporate spreads have

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 4>keeped tightening. And so money managers have been underweight corporate

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 4>bonds for a decade. If you go back and just

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 4>look at a soil chart of where general bond funds are,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 4>they've been underweight mortgages forever. So there is an opportunity

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 4>for them to come in. But like I think that

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 4>started happening and they all got disappointed, and so we'll

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 4>see if that continues.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, earlier when you said you're going to touch

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 3>on a odd blog see theme, you said the move index.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 3>But I thought you were going to go to the

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 3>supply chain aspect, because there is this supply chain right

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 3>of mortgages. And I remember that in like summer or

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>spring of twenty twenty, when interest rates were sent to zero,

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 3>that one of the stories that was out there was

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 3>that there was so much demand for refin activity that

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 3>actually the humans who had to do it, oh where

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 3>they were human capital.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Married under paperwork because there's.

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 3>A lot of paperwork, which also speaking of why people

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 3>might not refly like paperwork, it's a really annoying especially

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 3>after the Great Financial Crisis, just hundreds of documents. That's

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 3>not fun. Can you talk a little bit about the

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of like the infrastructure of mortgage capacity and how

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 3>that's evolved over time?

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Sure, sure, I do. I feel like we're hitting odd last,

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 4>that's very real. And what the banks will do is

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 4>they'll assess, well, boy, how many mortgages can we process

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 4>in a day? Right, and that will help them set

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 4>the rate right, because there's no sense in being overly

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 4>competitive with your rate if I can't even process right. So, yeah,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 4>so that is that absolutely can be an issue now

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 4>right now. The opposite is there there's just not enough

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 4>business to be done, right. You just mentioned applications being

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 4>so low, and so that probably has resolved in a

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 4>little under hiring in the space. Right. Maybe there'st been

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 4>a ton of lay offs, but there certainly has not

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 4>been a ton of hiring, right, And so maybe maybe

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 4>that's just through attrition head councer down in that space.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 4>And so if there is a surprise and in twelve

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 4>months mortgage rates are four or some such, we will

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 4>absolutely be talking about that. Again.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely interesting.

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to ask the question that I'm sure

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is on everyone's mind per that Google trends chart, but

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>when do mortgages come down?

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Or what will it take it?

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 4>So we should. Let's let's talk about why they've risen

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 4>since that FED meeting, and then that I think that'll

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 4>inform where they're headed. Right, So, look, the tenure treasury

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 4>is not a function of where the FED is today.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 4>It's a function of where people anticipate the FED being

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 4>in the next year two, three, right, and beyond three

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 4>it's sort of fuzzy, but like you know, year two,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 4>we sort of have a sense, right, we can make

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 4>a guess. And so going into that September meeting, people

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 4>started thinking themselves, Boy, then my cut fifty basis points

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 4>in September, fifty basis points in November, maybe even fifty

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 4>more basis points in December. Right, you pull up your

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 4>WRP chart on the terminal. You can see this, right

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 4>if you go back to then. But since then, what happened.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 4>We got a big jobs report the beginning of October.

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 4>That was the September report, but came out October, and

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 4>that was kind of a game changer, because not only

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 4>did we get a solid number for September, but it

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 4>was huge upward revisions kind of erased what looked like

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 4>a downward trend in hiring. Right. Well, now all of

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, we're like, boy, the FED might be a

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 4>lot closer to that neutral rate than we think. Right,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 4>They're probably gonna still cut in November, but maybe they'll

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 4>cut in December. Maybe they won't, but if they do,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 4>it's certainly not gonna be fifty basis points unless something changes.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 4>And so that change in expectations has caused a tenure

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 4>to rise, so commensurately the mortgage rate has risen, right,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 4>And so from that store you can say, all right,

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 4>well it comes pretty easy to see what's going to

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 4>cause mortgage rates to drop. The tenure needs to drop, right,

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 4>And what's going to cause the tenure to drop, Well,

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna need more FED cuts priced in. What's going

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 4>to cause more FED cuts get priced in? We need

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 4>the economy to get weaker.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I'm just gonna I'm not gonna pose

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 3>this as a question. But another thing that has happened

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 3>since September eighteenth is that the odds of Donald Trump

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 3>winning have gone up significantly if you look at the

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 3>betting market, and there is a widespread view among economists

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 3>that thanks to tariffs tax cuts, that could also mean

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>a reflationary impulse in the economy starting maybe early next year.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just throwing out there. You know, you mentioned

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 3>the jobs report, but policy may get more reflationary after January.

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 4>That I do think that's the consensus view that it's

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 4>starting out as it means higher interest rates. Like, we'll

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 4>just see if that happens. But I think the key

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 4>here is that it's about an anticipation period because even

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 4>what you're saying, Joe about potential, you know, change in

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.959
<v Speaker 4>physical policy functions, what you're saying, right, that's a big change.

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 4>That's an anticipation as well, right, So it's all about

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 4>what's being anticipated now, what's happening in real time.

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Tracy, obviously Tom mentioned people looking forward,

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 3>and you know, people, it's funny people are talking about

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 3>long and variable legs with monetary policy. But I increasingly

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 3>think it should be long and variable leads because rates

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>have been falling for over a year, well before the

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>FED formally Yeah about cuts. So there's a sense in

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 3>which he's one of my favorite phrases, you know, is

0:28:59.560 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 3>priced in.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, markets be four at looking, that's for sure.

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Tom.

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we would be remiss if we didn't ask

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a veteran MBS trader and analyst what two thousand and

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>eight was, like, give us some war stories.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I lost a lot of weight, super stressed.

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 3>No, that's great.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, it was the worst reason I've ever had

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 4>was What was wild about that time was no one

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 4>really knew how deep it could get, right, Like, there

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 4>was a lot of assumptions people made, well, I mean,

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 4>if this happens, then like, but we also were living it, right.

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 4>So when Fanny ma and Freddy Mack were taken over

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 4>in the beginning part of September, this was a week

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 4>or there's about two weeks I believe before Lehman failed,

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 4>which is almost equally as big a deal, but kind

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 4>of forgotten to history was Fanny made Freddy Mack were

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 4>taken over because they were functionally insolvent and they became

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 4>under pressure through early on nine to sell down their

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 4>mortgage portfolio. Okay, so at that time, Tracy, you asked

0:29:58.080 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 4>who buys mortgages? Well, at that time I said, well,

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.479
<v Speaker 4>Fanny made Freddimac. They're they're number one. So they were

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 4>not only guarantee mortgages, but they were a big buyer. Okay,

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 4>And is that left the market? Not only was there

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 4>just a ton of fear, was lack of capital available

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 4>in general, which had this big player who was kind

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>of gone, right, And so mortgage spreads, the spread we

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 4>were talking about between treasuries and with that went through

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the roof, right, So and then we had to reassess like, well,

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 4>what does this mean if this big player's footprint is gone.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 4>And then of course as they became more of a

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 4>permanent war to the state, how they went about guaranteeing mortgages,

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 4>what the GFE, how the gfe's worked, all that stuff

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 4>got reformed, and so it's been a massive change in

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 4>the space for sure. You know.

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Just one last question for me, and again it's sort

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>of technical, all this paperwork, why can't we just have

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 3>like one is it just impossible to imagine that one

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 3>click refise whatever exists because of all the credit check

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'm just like used to everything else finance,

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 3>like one click move of your account from here to hear,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 3>one click do to this, And I was like, why

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>does someone offer one click mortgage REFI is just is

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 3>it just always going to be too much human capital

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 3>intensive for something like that because you've been a great product.

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, my bet is that regulation makes that hard. Right, So, like,

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 4>if you're gonna sell it to fan, we're gonna get

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 4>the guarantee. You actually, you actually can get guarantee without

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 4>selling the mortgage. But let's say you're gonna get the guarantee,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 4>then you're gonna have to go through Fanny and Freddy's hoops,

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 4>which you won't be shocked to know that their computer

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 4>systems aren't aren't the greatest. So you always have that right.

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 4>And then but the bank itself is going to have

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 4>to follow certain regulations even it's going to keep the

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 4>loan on book, right, And so I suspect that's that

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 4>element makes that difficult. That would be my bet.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's usually the answer to questions about like, well,

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>why don't we just use technology to make it easier.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>It's usually regulation.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if there's ever been any like why combinator

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 3>startups like we're going to do one click reefise, et cetera,

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and then they run into it's like, oh, actually, there's

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 3>just a bunch of reasons why this product doesn't exist anyway.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you've run a failed one click mortgage startup,

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>let us know and we'll have you on the podcast.

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Tom, that was absolutely amazing. You were truly

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the perfect guest to talk about high mortgage rates. So

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on off on.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me, Joe.

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>That was so good to have Tom on talking about

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>all of this, And I do feel like I understand

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it more. It is funny. I mean, I do think

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>when you think of easing in monetary policy, like one

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of the big transmission mechanisms is still supposed to be

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates. Right. But I think if we've learned one

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>thing from our current experience, it's that that doesn't always

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily pass through. The pass throughs don't pass through.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say two things. It's like the pass

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 3>throughs don't happen in a very linear, predictable way. There

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 3>is nothing that happened on September eighteenth that made everybody's cost.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 3>There are some instruments, you know, short term instruments that

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 3>are directly tied to the FED funds rate, but nothing

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 3>mechanical happened on September eighteenth that just like made cost

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>borrowing and everyone new September eighteenth or that a FED

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 3>cut was eventually coming as inflation started to roll over

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 3>after its peak, and therefore the FED cutting did create

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 3>lower rates. It just happened in anticipations cut rather than afterwards.

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 3>But it is ironic then that you get that big

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 3>surge in people looking for refinance after it was fully

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 3>priced in.

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I do like your leading lag idea.

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You should write about that in the newsletter.

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 3>That's a good idea. Maybe I'll write about it Monday,

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 3>our new daily Odd Lots newsletter. Maybe I'll write about

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 3>it Monday when this episode comes out.

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, I think we've said new daily newsletter enough

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on this episode. Shall we leave it there?

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>This has been another edition of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at The

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Stalwart follow Tom Graff. He's at tdgraph. Follow our producers

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Erman dash, Ol Bennett at Dashbot

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and kill Brooks at Kilbrooks. Thank you to a producer,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Moses Ondem. For more Oddlots content, go to Bloomberg dot

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 3>com slash Odloffere have transcripts, a blog, and a new

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 3>daily newsletter.

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>And if you enjoy Odd Lots, if you like it

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>when we dive into the math behind mortgage rates, then

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, in addition

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to getting our new daily newsletter, you can also listen

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to all of our episodes absolutely add free. All you

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple

0:34:40.960 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts and then follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.