Speaker 1: We spent a lot of time talking on this podcast
Speaker 1: about this bizarro world that we live in where the
Speaker 1: irrational seems to supersede the rational. And one of those
Speaker 1: big moments, and one of the most glaring examples of that,
Speaker 1: is throughout COVID, where we have discarded things like natural immunity,
Speaker 1: where we have ignored vaccine injury, vaccine death. Where we
Speaker 1: have listened and continue to listen as a society to
Speaker 1: people like Dr Fauci, who has gotten everything wrong, and
Speaker 1: not only has he gotten everything wrong, but has invested
Speaker 1: interest in covering up the truth when it comes to
Speaker 1: where COVID originated because of the n i h S
Speaker 1: work and funding of gain a function at the Uhan
Speaker 1: Institute of Virology. So we're very fortunate to have leaders
Speaker 1: in this country, to have doctor scientists who have spoken out,
Speaker 1: who have been fearless in speaking out. We've had a
Speaker 1: lot of those individuals on this podcast, people like Dr Atlas,
Speaker 1: people like Dr j Battaria, people like Dr Martin colder If,
Speaker 1: people like Dr Pierre Corey. The list goes on. Of
Speaker 1: the people we've had on the Dr Harvey Rish, the
Speaker 1: list goes on, and the people we've had on this
Speaker 1: podcast who have been brave and bold Doctor Joseph Latipo recently,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to add Dr Peter McCullough to that
Speaker 1: list as well. He is one of the most published
Speaker 1: cardiologists in America with over one thousand publications and six
Speaker 1: hundred citations and the National Library of Medicine. He's an internist,
Speaker 1: a cardiologist, and epidemiologist as well. Uh and he was
Speaker 1: also one of the pioneers in leading the country at
Speaker 1: the outset of the pandemic with dozens of peer reviewed
Speaker 1: publications on the infection, also talking about protocols in ways
Speaker 1: that we could respond to COVID early on. This doesn't
Speaker 1: always make you a popular person. He was banned from
Speaker 1: Twitter for a period of time. Again, we've had these
Speaker 1: conversations on here about how there's not been a consensus
Speaker 1: about COVID, that the science has not been settled, but
Speaker 1: they've tried to manufacture one. They've tried to force this
Speaker 1: consensus through censorship, through attacking people who speak out, revoking
Speaker 1: medical licenses from people who speak out. So we're going
Speaker 1: to get into all of this with Dr Peter mccaull
Speaker 1: to talk about what exactly is m R and A.
Speaker 1: What is it due to the heart? As a cardiologist?
Speaker 1: What is he saying? What are the dangerous of the vaccine?
Speaker 1: What do you need to know? And how do we
Speaker 1: arrive at this place of insanity, particularly when we have
Speaker 1: had so many people who are esteemed, such as Dr
Speaker 1: Peter mccaulla, who have warned us, who have told us
Speaker 1: the truth, who have tried to bring rational conversations to
Speaker 1: the country in an age of irrational behavior and irrational
Speaker 1: thought process. And also, why is our government so dead
Speaker 1: set on getting vaccines in the arms of so many Americans?
Speaker 1: What's the why behind that? So much to talk to
Speaker 1: you with Dr Peter mccaull who has been fearless and
Speaker 1: all of this. I hope you enjoyed this conversation. So
Speaker 1: Dr Peter McCullough, thanks so much for joining the show. Sir,
Speaker 1: I really appreciate your voice throughout COVID. I know it's
Speaker 1: not been easy, but we have needed people like you,
Speaker 1: so I appreciate everything you've done to to speak up
Speaker 1: and tell people the truth. So thank you. Thanks for
Speaker 1: having me on the show. You know, Dr you're one
Speaker 1: of the most published cardiologists in America, with over a
Speaker 1: thousand publications and six centered citations in the natural the
Speaker 1: National Library of Medicine. Why are so many people ignoring
Speaker 1: concerns regarding the MR and A vaccines? The vaccine program
Speaker 1: has been unprecedented in terms of flows of money. The
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen Community Cores is a program from the White
Speaker 1: House and the Department of Health and Human Services. In
Speaker 1: one on their website, over thirteen billion dollars flowed two
Speaker 1: doctor organizations, to churches, to media and Hollywood, to Black
Speaker 1: and Hispanic groups, to the National Football League, and that
Speaker 1: money flowed with talking points, and the talking points were
Speaker 1: to support these vaccines. Visor Maderna hired Webber Shandwick, one
Speaker 1: of the most prominent PR marketing firms in the United States,
Speaker 1: and they initiated a plan called Planned v X, which
Speaker 1: was to get their marketing people inside Corporate America to
Speaker 1: push these vaccines, to push vaccine mandates. Webber Shamwick had
Speaker 1: an embedded unit in the CDC to actually promote Visor
Speaker 1: and Maderna to the CDC, and the CDC paid Webber Shandwick.
Speaker 1: The corruption is wide open right now. Money is flowing
Speaker 1: and it's all for the promotion of these vaccines. That's
Speaker 1: how this has gotten off the rails. So hearing that
Speaker 1: and just looking at health more broadly, how much of
Speaker 1: what we are told is actually true? You know, in
Speaker 1: terms of the vaccines, everyone knows that every medicinal product
Speaker 1: has risks and benefits. Every product does. There's no perfect medicine.
Speaker 1: There's no perfect vaccine. So when we see an advertisement
Speaker 1: for a medicine on TV, let's take Humora, that's actually
Speaker 1: the leading sales drug in the United States. Humor is
Speaker 1: used for psoriasis and a whole variety of autoimmune conditions.
Speaker 1: There's always the benefits given in the TV commercial, and
Speaker 1: then there's the risks like contracting tuberculosis, having other problems.
Speaker 1: There's always disclaimers. So in America sees advertisements on TV
Speaker 1: by the CDC by Visor Maderna that's say, the COVID
Speaker 1: nineteens are safe and effective and just take one. The
Speaker 1: Americans know that's egal advertising that that cannot occur in
Speaker 1: our country because the vaccines must be presented in terms
Speaker 1: of their theoretical benefits and the risks that we're seeing,
Speaker 1: and when it's safe and effective. As a talking government
Speaker 1: talking point, that violates the truth in Advertising Act, the
Speaker 1: US Drug and Cosmetic Act, and the Landman Act, even
Speaker 1: up to the President United States. The President United States
Speaker 1: has violated drug promotion law well. And of course we
Speaker 1: know that it's been a forced consensus, as you sort
Speaker 1: of laid out before, with the money flowing in the
Speaker 1: direction of being pro you know, COVID vaccines. We also
Speaker 1: know that people have been silenced. You've been silenced, shut down,
Speaker 1: shut out of Twitter for a period of time. People
Speaker 1: have lost their medical licenses as well for speaking up
Speaker 1: and speaking out. So you know, it's not even a
Speaker 1: real consensus, it's it's a manufactured consensus, forced consensus. There
Speaker 1: hasn't been any dialogue. You know. I've testified in the
Speaker 1: US Senate multiple times, most recently on December seven, and
Speaker 1: I co moderated the session we have. We read the
Speaker 1: invitation list of who was invited to come to this
Speaker 1: session in this Kenny Coccus room we're in the Russell Building,
Speaker 1: and then included Anthony Fauci and Michelle Lewinsky and our
Speaker 1: Surgeon General Murphy, our White House Corona Corona Task Force
Speaker 1: Coordinator Jah They were all invited FDA Chairman Caleb they
Speaker 1: were invited in a public servants, they have a duty
Speaker 1: to attend and to learn from experts who are caring
Speaker 1: for COVID nineteen patients, publishing their findings, who are leading
Speaker 1: advancements in the field. And this has been multiple U S.
Speaker 1: Senate sessions, and they refused to attend. So there is
Speaker 1: no dialogue because those who are advancing the vaccine agenda
Speaker 1: don't wish to engage in dialogue. Well, I remember when
Speaker 1: Joe Biden took the stage at the CNN town hall,
Speaker 1: I believe those in July of I want to say,
Speaker 1: I don't remember. I think it was one I believe
Speaker 1: saying that the vaccines would prevent you from getting COVID
Speaker 1: when we had just all witnessed a bunch of the
Speaker 1: Texas Democrats had come down to Washington, d C. They
Speaker 1: were all allegedly vaccinated and it ended up being a
Speaker 1: super spreader event. And then there was also my understanding
Speaker 1: a July four study that the CDC had been looking
Speaker 1: at out of Provincetown, Massachusetts, where of a cluster we're
Speaker 1: all vaccinated individuals. So at this point when he took
Speaker 1: the stage, at the point in September when he announced
Speaker 1: vaccine mandates, they knew that vaccinated people were getting and
Speaker 1: spreading COVID, yet they did it anyways, It's true. What
Speaker 1: happened is there were false claims for the vaccine program.
Speaker 1: The first false claim was that the vaccines prevent one
Speaker 1: from actually getting COVID, and the CDC was collecting data
Speaker 1: on those fully vaccinated who are being hospitalized and dying
Speaker 1: of COVID. Thank and that's through the spring. By May one,
Speaker 1: the CDC was overwhelmed with cases and they announced we
Speaker 1: will no longer track this. They gave up. So the
Speaker 1: first claim that the vaccines prevent COVID nineteen, that claim
Speaker 1: went down. The second claim was that it prevented transmission.
Speaker 1: So the president said this. All the late night tacosts
Speaker 1: shows said that Rachel Maddow had a whole monologue on this.
Speaker 1: Embarrassingly they said this, Uh so did uh every every
Speaker 1: government officials said this. And when all these transmission events
Speaker 1: occurred among fully vaccinated to fully vaccinated, it was clear.
Speaker 1: They were published studies one by Chow Charion Rhymaristhma of Coursi.
Speaker 1: They all showed that the vaccinator were loaded with virus
Speaker 1: up in their nose when they presented for testing and
Speaker 1: they easily passed it to other vaccinated unvaccinated people. So
Speaker 1: Rachelle Lewinsky came out in the summer and said, hold
Speaker 1: on here, the vaccines don't prevent transmission. Okay, So that
Speaker 1: claim went down. There was only one final claim was
Speaker 1: that the vaccines reduced the risk of hospitalization and death. Well,
Speaker 1: the CDC was already overwhelmed with these failure cases called
Speaker 1: breakthrough cases. Uh, and we've never had a prospective, animized,
Speaker 1: double blind for simple controlled trial showing that the vaccines
Speaker 1: reduce hospitalization and death as a primary secondary endpoint. So
Speaker 1: so there's no evidence for these claims. And if one
Speaker 1: looks at the consent form that you signed a take
Speaker 1: a vaccine, there's only one benefit listed in the consent
Speaker 1: form then that is the vaccines have been past tense
Speaker 1: shown to reduce the risk of COVID period period. That's
Speaker 1: past tense. That means with the very early original trials
Speaker 1: with the ancestral hand stream, the vaccines did reduce some
Speaker 1: cases of COVID. That's all gone away now since that
Speaker 1: the virus is mutated and all the data has come out,
Speaker 1: So there are no supportable claims of benefit now for
Speaker 1: the COVID nineteen vaccines none. So where did these claims
Speaker 1: originated from? Was it the vaccine many facturers? Was it
Speaker 1: the White House or kind of you know who sort
Speaker 1: of started some of these initial claims. The claims are
Speaker 1: all from the Emergency Use Authorization mechanism, which is a
Speaker 1: military mechanism. So when the vaccines were rolled out, it
Speaker 1: was alex As r h HS and the Department of
Speaker 1: Defense that rolls out the vaccines. Weiser and Maderna, Johnson
Speaker 1: Johnson Astrosenica outside the States, no evacs um. They're essentially
Speaker 1: defense their shields for defense contractors. So it's important for
Speaker 1: people to understand. So, for instance, Maderna doesn't make its
Speaker 1: own vaccine. It's made by a company called Biodefense, and
Speaker 1: they are a defense contractor for their research division of
Speaker 1: the military called ARPA, and they have a big plant
Speaker 1: up in Mississauga. For Johnson Johnson Astrosena coach I had
Speaker 1: no viral vaccines. They're made by Emergent BioSolutions outside of
Speaker 1: m Baltimore, Maryland. So under the Emergency Use authorized contracts.
Speaker 1: The disturbing thing is there are no affections for safety,
Speaker 1: quality or purity of the vaccines as they get put
Speaker 1: into the vials. None so fires Maderna Johnson Johnson, Astrozonk.
Speaker 1: They don't even know what's in the vials. They're made
Speaker 1: by defense contractors. All of this is in the open.
Speaker 1: One can just make a few clicks. Everything I'm saying
Speaker 1: is is easily identifiable on the Internet. The next reason
Speaker 1: why the variation and lot to lots is thought to
Speaker 1: be explaining why some people are injured and lose their
Speaker 1: life with the vaccines and others are perfectly fine. It
Speaker 1: probably has to do with the quantity of genetic material
Speaker 1: messenger RNA that's in each trial. And for those at home,
Speaker 1: what is mr and A and what does it due
Speaker 1: to the body? Mr and A is a form of
Speaker 1: genetic material is loaded on lipid nanoparticles. It's injected into
Speaker 1: the arm. It's circulating in the body. Within an hour,
Speaker 1: it distributes to the brain, the heart, of the adrenal
Speaker 1: glands of reproductive organs. It gets sent all over the body.
Speaker 1: Then the genetic code is taken up into cells in
Speaker 1: those organs, and then the cells begin to produce the
Speaker 1: spike protein. The spike protein is the spine on the
Speaker 1: surface of the virus. It's the protein that's loaded with
Speaker 1: all the lethal effects of the virus. It damages every
Speaker 1: cell it touches, probably destroys it. It causes blood clotting,
Speaker 1: causes heart damage, neurologic damage, causes autoimmunity. The spike protein
Speaker 1: is probably the most dangerous protein we've ever seen in
Speaker 1: human medicine. I think it's far more dangerous than staff
Speaker 1: of coco toxin or tetanous toxin. So to have the
Speaker 1: genetic code for this lethal protein and then injected in
Speaker 1: individuals and have production of this potentially fatal protein for
Speaker 1: an uncontrolled duration of time and an uncontrolled quantity is
Speaker 1: the most reckless medical idea ever conceived. And I published
Speaker 1: this in an op ed in The Hill in August
Speaker 1: before the vaccines welled out, and I told lawmakers in
Speaker 1: Washington that this the greatest gamble of of all time.
Speaker 1: In fact, it has been so many people have died
Speaker 1: within a few hours of taking this. They literally take
Speaker 1: the shot and they die. To CDC as of December
Speaker 1: nine admits to fifteen thousand, seven thirty two Americans that
Speaker 1: have died, many just shortly after taking the shot. And
Speaker 1: this is greatly underreported. In an FDA testimony over the
Speaker 1: last two years, multiple experts, multiple epidemiologists. The underreporting factor
Speaker 1: for that number is probably about thirty, meaning it's it's
Speaker 1: thirty times fifteen thou So the number of Americans who
Speaker 1: have lost their lives, by a reasonable estimate is four
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand people have died attributed to the vaccine.
Speaker 1: Quick commercial break back with Dr. Peter mccaulla, Why do
Speaker 1: you think they lead with m R and A vaccines
Speaker 1: as opposed to you know, traditional vaccines like the Johnson
Speaker 1: and Johnson. Why MARNA because they had it already planned.
Speaker 1: So DARPA, the the research unit of the military, announced
Speaker 1: a program called the ADEPT P three program in and
Speaker 1: P three stands for a Pandemic Protection Preparedness Program and
Speaker 1: it's on their website. You can look it up. DARPA
Speaker 1: ADEPT P three and in they said they will use
Speaker 1: Messenger r and A technology to end pandemics in sixty days.
Speaker 1: So DARPA, the research Unit of the military, and then BARTA,
Speaker 1: the research unit of the nih was already working with
Speaker 1: Messenger RNA and they had a DARPA contractors and consultants
Speaker 1: that were guiding them that this could be a new
Speaker 1: genetic tool to be used in the military. Two, so
Speaker 1: the military would be strengthened against biological threats. This is
Speaker 1: all in the new era of biological weaponry, where one
Speaker 1: adverse serry would have a biological weapon and on defense
Speaker 1: one would have to come up with a solution with it.
Speaker 1: So our military has been in this biological threat development
Speaker 1: arena for quite some time, and they have programs for smallpox,
Speaker 1: monkey pots, for um anthrax, for stars COVID two since
Speaker 1: so this was ready to go. It wasn't started when
Speaker 1: President Trump said Operation Warms, people are going to come
Speaker 1: up with vaccines, and then three days later Maderna says,
Speaker 1: we have a vaccine. That's not what happened. Maderna got
Speaker 1: its first flow of money from the U. S. Government
Speaker 1: to start working on this, but they hadn't previously had
Speaker 1: one on the market like this. Correct in terms of
Speaker 1: this wide scale mass produced in everyone's arms. They've been trying,
Speaker 1: but no, they had tried development wise, there's never been
Speaker 1: a commercialized product um for emergency use authorization. By the way,
Speaker 1: you ay, that's always military. So this has never been
Speaker 1: a mechanism to use on the public the anthex vaccines,
Speaker 1: for instance, were used in the military. Same thing with smallpox,
Speaker 1: but it's not a it's not a US commercial mechanism.
Speaker 1: So this is the first time that a military program
Speaker 1: was directed towards the general public and the companies. In
Speaker 1: a sense, our marketing shields that money flows to fires
Speaker 1: Maderna ferences, and then it flows right to these back
Speaker 1: to these defense contractors who make the vaccine. I think
Speaker 1: a lot of Americans don't understand the military nature of this,
Speaker 1: and the military nature of this explains a lot because
Speaker 1: that's the reason why the government has taken this stance.
Speaker 1: That listen, we don't have to disclose any safety concerns.
Speaker 1: We don't give any exemptions to everybody. Everybody has to
Speaker 1: take it. You know, those are kind of military stances
Speaker 1: to take, and they're not clinical months that we take
Speaker 1: in practice. The doctor embraces the idea that everybody can
Speaker 1: take the same product. Another interesting observation is that the
Speaker 1: US government has never indicated which vaccine is better. You know,
Speaker 1: there's no asing majourn at Johnson Johnson Novavax. There must
Speaker 1: be a winner, there must be a loser. Governments and
Speaker 1: employers they don't seem to care. They just say, take
Speaker 1: a vaccine, take any vaccine, and none of that makes sense. Well,
Speaker 1: I've refused to get it. You know, I'm thirty seven,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not young, but i'm young ish. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm healthy. I don't. So I've not gotten it. I've
Speaker 1: I've made it very public. I'm not getting it. Everywhe
Speaker 1: a not bed in a column outlining uh, you know,
Speaker 1: back in November of it was not well received. As
Speaker 1: you can imagine, people don't like it. If if you
Speaker 1: speak up against it, is there a difference between the
Speaker 1: vaccines that were approved for emergency use authorization and then
Speaker 1: the ones that were approved the full le FDA approval?
Speaker 1: Because you were mentioning that, you know, we don't even
Speaker 1: necessarily each batch could theoretically be different. So then how
Speaker 1: do you you know, how does that approval process work?
Speaker 1: What should people know about that? Did they do the
Speaker 1: full testing that needs to be done? Considering this was
Speaker 1: all done in such a short manner. You know, I
Speaker 1: have been on I'm a frequent contrigar on Fox News
Speaker 1: America sees me, you know, virtually every week or every
Speaker 1: month on national TV, and I've said very clearly, very
Speaker 1: early in the pandemic that no one under age fifty
Speaker 1: should consider taking this vaccine because there's no assurances on
Speaker 1: short or long term safety, and people under age fifty
Speaker 1: by and large, COVID nineteen is like having a common cold,
Speaker 1: so the risks are not uh, you know, outweigh by
Speaker 1: theoretical benefits. So I've been very clear with America on
Speaker 1: that and um as a doctor who treats COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: I've developed treatment protocols and one of the most published
Speaker 1: people in COVID nineteen in the world. I have medical
Speaker 1: authority to make that determination for the country and I
Speaker 1: have and many people like you listened. So no, no
Speaker 1: one under age fifty should be taking this vaccine. Now,
Speaker 1: people over age fifty early on with medical problems considered
Speaker 1: it and they'd have to weigh out the risks and benefits.
Speaker 1: But now we've had so many analyzes pouring in that
Speaker 1: they can't be considered safe for anyone, and so there
Speaker 1: are calls to pull these off the market. They've been
Speaker 1: strict warnings in the World Council for Health now for
Speaker 1: two years now. June eleven two they simply said pull
Speaker 1: them off the market. We concluded in the US Senate
Speaker 1: on December seven, pull him off the market. Andrew bridget In,
Speaker 1: a Member of Parliament in UK public statement, pull him
Speaker 1: off the market. Same thing. Malcolm Roberts in Australia now
Speaker 1: calls across India, so I believe you made the right
Speaker 1: choice by not taking a vaccine. I didn't take it either.
Speaker 1: I'm sixty, I'm fit and strong, I've already had COVID.
Speaker 1: I would never consider taking a genetic injection in my body. Never.
Speaker 1: None of these vaccines are fully FDA approved. In August,
Speaker 1: both Fiser Maderna got biological Licensing agreement letters that said
Speaker 1: you could get full FDA approval if you did the
Speaker 1: right cardiac studies and had the right language in the
Speaker 1: couch insert about dangerous and pregnancy into the fetus. And
Speaker 1: the companies never did the studies, so they have not
Speaker 1: garnered full FDA approval. And you know that because they're
Speaker 1: still offered free by the government. When they get fully
Speaker 1: FDA approved that they will be paid for by insurance
Speaker 1: or people have to pay for a lot of pocket,
Speaker 1: they'll have a full package insert, so people know that
Speaker 1: they're not FDA approved. Right now, there's still government emergency
Speaker 1: use authorized, not ready for prime time vaccines. That was
Speaker 1: one of my concerns to is, you know, does it
Speaker 1: impact fertility with the m R and A And you
Speaker 1: know that I don't have kids yet I want them.
Speaker 1: I'm already thirty seven, so I'm already testing the water.
Speaker 1: So it's like, I don't really need to add anything
Speaker 1: additionally that's gonna, you know, make that, you know, more difficult.
Speaker 1: Do we know do we have an idea about what
Speaker 1: it might do to fertility and to having children in
Speaker 1: the future, or you're pregnant and you go out and
Speaker 1: get the vaccine. What we know is that the Bow
Speaker 1: distribution study done by Fiser for japan Japanese officials showed
Speaker 1: the vaccines go to the mammalian ovaries, which is very disturbing.
Speaker 1: So we've never had a vaccine that actually hits the ovaries.
Speaker 1: And the ovaries have a set number of eggs. As
Speaker 1: the genetic payload is downloaded into the female of variant
Speaker 1: cells and the spike proteins expressed, I can tell you
Speaker 1: almost invariably a woman who is going to lose eggs
Speaker 1: by taking each vaccine shot. Now and men, there's two
Speaker 1: good studies. One from Israel published in Andreology and the
Speaker 1: other one published a Jama by the Chinese. Both studies
Speaker 1: show that the vaccines and men drop sperm count and
Speaker 1: drops sperm motility. Those are the two major measures. So
Speaker 1: a man who's lower in the fertile range will be
Speaker 1: rendered infertile by COVID nineteen vaccination for six months, and
Speaker 1: then the man will rebound. The woman won't rebound because
Speaker 1: the number of eggs are set. So based on these
Speaker 1: observations I can tell you is that doctor almost certainly
Speaker 1: fertility is reduced in couples who have taken the vaccine,
Speaker 1: and with each successive shot there's probably even deeper levels
Speaker 1: of infertility. Now there are data emerging across Europe bets
Speaker 1: since the vaccines have been rolled out and forced on
Speaker 1: the population, fertility is dropping across Europe like a rock.
Speaker 1: And this has been published out. It's on multiple subjects,
Speaker 1: it's online and the Courageous Discourse subjects you can see
Speaker 1: the source of the data. But it's clear vaccines to
Speaker 1: reduce human fertility. What's really crazy is uh and pretty
Speaker 1: wild if you look over the course throughout COVID in
Speaker 1: this pandemic, is we've really ignored the rational for the irrational.
Speaker 1: Like to your point, you're talking about how early on
Speaker 1: in COVID you're recommending treatments. Treatments were ignored. You know,
Speaker 1: warnings about the vaccine that's been ignored. You know, questions
Speaker 1: raised about masks not doing anything that was ignored. We
Speaker 1: ignore natural immunity, which is pretty much been something that
Speaker 1: we have understood and abided by for forever. So why
Speaker 1: why do you think in this era we have ignored
Speaker 1: the rational for the irrational. Every irrational move taken by
Speaker 1: the government authorities, and this was worldwide, was for one purpose,
Speaker 1: and that was to get a needle in every arm.
Speaker 1: If you map every single one of those statements you've
Speaker 1: just made, they all map two. Mass vaccination over and
Speaker 1: over again in the world. Unfortunately, there's been a vaccine
Speaker 1: only strategy from the very beginning. Our US government hasn't
Speaker 1: said boo about early treatment. Early treatment developed rapidly. I
Speaker 1: published one of the very first treatment protocols by you know,
Speaker 1: by October of twenty October, we had a position association,
Speaker 1: the Association of American Position Surgeons, had a full home
Speaker 1: treatment guide. We had telemedicine networks prescribing medications for our patients,
Speaker 1: individual doctors, clinics. We basically had provided an answer for America,
Speaker 1: and we demonstrated by December multiple studies world wide that
Speaker 1: we had clear and convincing the evidence that we were
Speaker 1: on the right track. It means a p value less
Speaker 1: than point oh one that early treatment dramatically reduced the
Speaker 1: risk of hospitalization and depth. Later on, they were surveysed
Speaker 1: on one by Verdkirk and colleagues showing the only people
Speaker 1: in United States hospitalized and died of COVID nineteen where
Speaker 1: those who were denied early treatment. So it was always
Speaker 1: about early treatment for high risk individuals. Low risk individuals
Speaker 1: really don't need any prescription treatment, and that's what this
Speaker 1: whole pandemic was about. It was about treating patients. Our
Speaker 1: government impeded treatment time after time. They impeded and then
Speaker 1: blocked the use of hydroxy corquin, impeded, then blocked and
Speaker 1: use of ib mactin, impeded nasal sprays, general virusoidal and
Speaker 1: nasal space delupe pavadon id, hydrogen peroxide. Every single manufacture
Speaker 1: of a nasal spray got tangled up by the FDA
Speaker 1: and FTC and had block development efforts lawsuits. Our government
Speaker 1: blocked monoclonal ampis. He kept taking off the market when
Speaker 1: they were safe and effective and useful. All the way through.
Speaker 1: Our government never featured proven medicines in randomized trials like Budescinite,
Speaker 1: Culture Scene and others. It just kept going and going.
Speaker 1: The only thing our government did the entire time was
Speaker 1: promote fear suffering, hospitalization and death and then massively financially
Speaker 1: promote the vaccines and needle in every arm. That's what happened.
Speaker 1: And then also redefined things as well. I mean, the
Speaker 1: CDC redefined the definition of vaccine because we know that
Speaker 1: these do not provide immunity in the traditional sense, and
Speaker 1: you know MMR or polio they confer immunity, these do not.
Speaker 1: So also just redefining things that we have known to
Speaker 1: be true as well. Every rule was changed now for
Speaker 1: these vaccines. Every rule. Um. You know, there's an ethical
Speaker 1: code called the Nuremberg Code, which states we tried to
Speaker 1: learn from Nazi German and research that we would never
Speaker 1: provide a pressure of coercion or threat of reprisal for
Speaker 1: someone to take something new and experimental. It's purely up
Speaker 1: to their own judgment within a few months. Our government's
Speaker 1: just trampled over the Nuremberg Code and told government employees, contractors,
Speaker 1: and militaries they had to take this. We trampled over
Speaker 1: human rights like we've never seen before. And this happened
Speaker 1: over just a few months. And so everything was oriented
Speaker 1: towards the vaccines. And there's not a single place in
Speaker 1: our government right now where the authorities won't drop these
Speaker 1: vaccines despite pockets of great concern. You know, letters have
Speaker 1: gone from the Senate and the Congress telling Lloyd Austin
Speaker 1: the military dropped the vaccines. The Biden mandates went all
Speaker 1: the way up to the Supreme Court and four out
Speaker 1: of the five mandates were dropped partly, and based on
Speaker 1: my expert testimony for that case that went all the
Speaker 1: way up to the Supreme Court, I can tell you
Speaker 1: that there is an intense desire to push these vaccines
Speaker 1: at all costs. The most recent by valent massines were
Speaker 1: pre purchased by the US government. They failed in animal
Speaker 1: studies to stop COVID. There was a false surrogate rise
Speaker 1: in the antibodies, and the bivalent vaccines were approved with
Speaker 1: no human testing. And then our government went out and
Speaker 1: told people to take it. This is unprecedented to to
Speaker 1: ask the United States citizens to take a product that's
Speaker 1: never been tested in a single human being, unprecedented. Why
Speaker 1: are they pushing this so hard? We'd have to ask
Speaker 1: someone in a position of govern an authority why. We'd
Speaker 1: like to think that the presidents would know and be
Speaker 1: in level with us. We've gone through two presidents, Trump
Speaker 1: and Biden. Neither one have been honest with America on this.
Speaker 1: We've had uh Dr Anthony Fauci, he hasn't leveled why,
Speaker 1: White House Coordinator Shaw, CDC Director of Willinsky. We've had
Speaker 1: people from the FDA resign over this, People leave the
Speaker 1: c d C. No one will tell us why why
Speaker 1: these vaccines won't be dry. Aren't being dropped because they
Speaker 1: obviously don't work and they're not safe. We haven't covered
Speaker 1: safety yet, but the safety data are just are atrocious Americans.
Speaker 1: Every American knows is now that they take their life
Speaker 1: in their hands in their hands with each shot. If
Speaker 1: you can get into the safety data a little bit
Speaker 1: more in terms of, you know, some of the adverse reactions.
Speaker 1: I know we have theirs, but I've heard from a
Speaker 1: lot of people that you know, we don't even that's
Speaker 1: not even that's scratching the surface. Uh, you know, you
Speaker 1: talked about a little bit earlier. But let's get into
Speaker 1: a little bit more the safety concerns. What we know,
Speaker 1: what we still don't know the government sources of data
Speaker 1: that the CDC cre rates. One is BEARS Vaccine University
Speaker 1: reporting system that's open to all of us. When people
Speaker 1: take a vaccine, they're totally consult BEARS so they can
Speaker 1: be informed on safety. And again, the CDC is confirming
Speaker 1: fifteen thousand, seven thirty two Americans have died. And the
Speaker 1: reporting to THEIRS is by doctors like me. I make
Speaker 1: various reports every week in my practice, doctors, paramedics, corners, nurses.
Speaker 1: It's really a medical reporting system that's an astonishing number.
Speaker 1: Typically five more than fifty deaths is pulled off the
Speaker 1: market with a swine flu vaccine desks pulled off the market.
Speaker 1: But to let this go on to fifteen thousand, seven
Speaker 1: thirty two confirmed deaths in the CDC confirms every single
Speaker 1: death certificate they make, phone calls, they confirm them. That's underreported.
Speaker 1: We believe by thirty that means four hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: thousand Americans of titled vaccine. I mean, that's a war
Speaker 1: that's worse than any war we've ever been in. It's
Speaker 1: a self inflicted death. There's an analysis by McLachlan and
Speaker 1: colleagues early on in the pandemic from bears. It included
Speaker 1: a six percent of time. There's no other explanation outside
Speaker 1: the vaccine that the deaths are occurring in the elderly.
Speaker 1: And that's the reason why they're so hard to figure out,
Speaker 1: because people are at the end of their lives. But
Speaker 1: the death rates are astonishing in the elderly. We know
Speaker 1: all cost mortality is skyrocketing in every single data system,
Speaker 1: the Association of Actuaries or reporting this in life insurance data.
Speaker 1: It's coming out in every single data system that death
Speaker 1: is markedly increasing. It's not COVID, it's related to the vaccine.
Speaker 1: And then we have um just an array of other
Speaker 1: corroborating sources. So, for instance, Visor in the court ordered
Speaker 1: release of their dossier on their vaccine, Visor knew about
Speaker 1: one thousand two three does within ninety days of release
Speaker 1: of their vaccine. So Fiser in the FDA should have
Speaker 1: pulled it off the market probably before February one. The
Speaker 1: FDA did not want to release that dossier to America
Speaker 1: for fifty five years. The lawyer for the FDA fought
Speaker 1: the release of the viser dossier. So our government is
Speaker 1: involved right now in the pre prema faeschi uh mass
Speaker 1: fatality cover up of a drug, which is the Fiser vaccine.
Speaker 1: Madournal looks no better than Johnson Johnson Novavac is also
Speaker 1: very concerning. So that's just death alone. Multiple data sources
Speaker 1: confirmed the vaccines are resulting in large numbers of deaths.
Speaker 1: How do people die well? Now, we have over two
Speaker 1: hundred papers in their perio viewed literature that the vaccines
Speaker 1: cause heart damage milcarditis. All of them do, by the way,
Speaker 1: and the FDA admit to this pretty early on in
Speaker 1: June of But we knew this long before this. Ralph
Speaker 1: Barrack and nursing or Carolina Chapel Hill had shown beta
Speaker 1: coronavirus is damaged the heartback, so we knew it was
Speaker 1: possible that the spike protein would damage to the heart.
Speaker 1: That's the reason why there was such a concern to
Speaker 1: screen for minocarditis during the first wave of COVID. What
Speaker 1: turns out, the respiratory illness causes relatively few cases of micardiis,
Speaker 1: but the vaccine causes large numbers. Two prospective chord studies,
Speaker 1: one by Mansugan and the other one by Passic now
Speaker 1: show when we measure everything at baseline, take the vaccine
Speaker 1: and measure everything again, the rate of heart damage is
Speaker 1: about two point five percent. And all for a virus
Speaker 1: that isn't that deadly on its face, that it really
Speaker 1: isn't much deadlier than the flu. So all this vaccine injury,
Speaker 1: this forceful nature, this you know, eroding of the rules
Speaker 1: of the norms of you know, everything rational and everything
Speaker 1: that has made sense, all for something that isn't really
Speaker 1: that deadly. The Great Barrington Declaration proposed in October of
Speaker 1: by j Barachara, who's in my group at Fox News.
Speaker 1: He's from Stanford Barton Caldorf, also in my media group
Speaker 1: at Fox, from Harvard and NCNICA group to from Oxford,
Speaker 1: and a million doctors signed to including myself. It said, listen,
Speaker 1: only protect the seniors. But this is like the common
Speaker 1: cold for most young people like you and me, and
Speaker 1: for the seniors it can be like like the flu
Speaker 1: or and it can be fatal in people who are
Speaker 1: very frail. But we would only protect the seniors, no lockdowns,
Speaker 1: no masks. If there was going to be a safe,
Speaker 1: an effective vaccine, it would only be for the seniors,
Speaker 1: maybe two point seven million people. I'm not against vaccines,
Speaker 1: but they should always be targeted. We should never blanket
Speaker 1: back to the entire population. With the knowledge genetic vaccine
Speaker 1: and and and the fact that our government pushed vaccines
Speaker 1: into children down to age six months, people should be
Speaker 1: looking at that and saying, listen, that's wrong. We would
Speaker 1: never do that in a rational civil society. Vaccinating pregnant women,
Speaker 1: people should look at that, understand that violates every bit
Speaker 1: of meudiculture spons We never introduce new, dangerous injections into
Speaker 1: pregnant women. Never. The American College of Sectors in Gynecology
Speaker 1: took money, a ton of it from the federal government
Speaker 1: in this community Core program. It was a government bribe
Speaker 1: to put the push the vaccines on populations who you know,
Speaker 1: good judgment would tell us to d do this quick
Speaker 1: breaks stay with us. I'm for vaccines that actually confirm unity,
Speaker 1: that are studied that I need, you know, but this
Speaker 1: is none of those, which is why you know I
Speaker 1: didn't get it. I wanted to ask you real quick.
Speaker 1: You know. Another thing that is odd to me is,
Speaker 1: you know, if you look at where this virus came from,
Speaker 1: most common sense, just deductive reasoning, would lead one to
Speaker 1: believe that it was a mistake at the Wuhan Institute
Speaker 1: of Virology in Wuhan, where the original break took place,
Speaker 1: where they're studying coronaviruses. Yet we see people like Dr
Speaker 1: Fauci still trying to hold onto the theory that it
Speaker 1: occurred in nature, which sort of just defies common sense.
Speaker 1: Why is he still pushing that when you don't have
Speaker 1: to be a you know, a rocket scientist to see
Speaker 1: that all signs point took coming from the lab. It
Speaker 1: seems very thin veiled cover up the U. S National
Speaker 1: Institute's Health and then you military dark path through these agencies.
Speaker 1: They devised stars Kobe too. It was engineered. It's well
Speaker 1: documented in all the periviewed publications to publications that anybody
Speaker 1: listening to this can pull. First authors by Mena Cherry,
Speaker 1: Senior authors Ralph Berrick, This University in North Carolina, Chapola, Hell, Harvard,
Speaker 1: and a Swiss institute. The US government dollars they they
Speaker 1: did their research, They published their papers in Nature Proceedings
Speaker 1: Nature Communications and the Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences,
Speaker 1: two of the best journals. These are widely read papers.
Speaker 1: The title of the papers say the emergence of Stars
Speaker 1: Kobe two Indo human populations and it states that this
Speaker 1: is a US funded project. It was conceived by US researchers.
Speaker 1: The work was contracted out to the Bio Security Annex
Speaker 1: uh in the Wu Hand Institute of Virology. They thank
Speaker 1: the Chinese for letting the US use their facilities. The
Speaker 1: first paper has no Chinese authors. The second paper has
Speaker 1: three Chinese authors. But it's clear that papers are clear
Speaker 1: this is a US project that intentionally made despite protein
Speaker 1: more infectious and more lethal. They kept tweaking it and
Speaker 1: tweaking it until they can invade a humanized respiratory epith
Speaker 1: attractive animals and kill the animals. It was intentional and
Speaker 1: at the same time they were trying to come up
Speaker 1: with a vaccine monoclonal antibodies as an answer. Remember in
Speaker 1: the military biological weapons research, they work on developing a
Speaker 1: threat and they work on developing an answer. But it's
Speaker 1: clear this is all fully disclosed to the public that
Speaker 1: this is a US project that was done in the
Speaker 1: Buhan instead of virology. What Vaucin and the others are
Speaker 1: trying to bank on is that no one would just
Speaker 1: read the papers published in the National Index, in the
Speaker 1: National Library Medicine published and good journals, and that they
Speaker 1: can fool the public by saying that, oh, it's just
Speaker 1: a rose in the fish market. It's clear the virus
Speaker 1: was physically in the lab. There must have been a
Speaker 1: breach of lab security. Somehow the virus got out, somebody
Speaker 1: went to the fish market, and then it went we
Speaker 1: went from there. But these are these types of implausible,
Speaker 1: ridiculous things that are government agencies can say that said,
Speaker 1: can you imagine if they did that? This? Can you
Speaker 1: imagine that this happened? And the first thing that came
Speaker 1: out and said, listen, we've got to tell you the U.
Speaker 1: S Government was working on this. We were using to
Speaker 1: lab the Mouhan, China, and this accidentally got up. We're
Speaker 1: going to do everything in our power to try to
Speaker 1: limit this. But you know that the fault here is
Speaker 1: are this was the US government project, and here are
Speaker 1: all the papers that show it was. And we've been
Speaker 1: working on vaccines as a solution to this since and
Speaker 1: we have messenger RNA vaccines that we're going to make advance.
Speaker 1: If President Trump came out and just told that to America,
Speaker 1: I think everybody would have a much different attitude right now.
Speaker 1: But we were lied to, We were like to buy
Speaker 1: government agency officials up and down with these thin, veiled, implausible,
Speaker 1: almost ridiculous explanations for what happened. I don't trust any
Speaker 1: of republic both officials anymore. I even had my doctor
Speaker 1: tried to one. They've tried to get me to get
Speaker 1: the vaccine, and I've basically told them to go fla I.
Speaker 1: And then she was also the doctor recently try to
Speaker 1: get me to take the flu shot, and I was like,
Speaker 1: I don't need that either. So I've just I'm sort of,
Speaker 1: you know, unless we're tried and true, like polio and
Speaker 1: MMR and things of that nature, I'm just going to
Speaker 1: opt opt out of a lot of these recommendations because
Speaker 1: I don't trust these people anymore. Um, you know, I
Speaker 1: wanted to ask you, go ahead, let's pick up on
Speaker 1: the flu shot. You know, a flu shot is now
Speaker 1: advanced down to children age one. Age one children don't
Speaker 1: get serious and flu ones at age one, you can
Speaker 1: see something's gone out of you know, out of the
Speaker 1: norm with the advancement of vaccine schedule. But I was
Speaker 1: born there were just three shots, five different ancrogens, but
Speaker 1: three shots. And I'm like you, I took them all,
Speaker 1: and I don't have any problem with vaccines. But you know,
Speaker 1: a child today faces sixteen different anigens and seventy two
Speaker 1: different shots, and in the first day of life, that
Speaker 1: baby is being given mult bull vaccines and things that
Speaker 1: are that are absolutely not needed, like hepatitis B. I mean,
Speaker 1: I took hepatitis B before I started working with blood
Speaker 1: and body fluids in the hospital. That's the healthcare workers need.
Speaker 1: Hepptites be vaccine, not not one day old babies unless
Speaker 1: they're born to a drug abuse of a mother. I mean,
Speaker 1: somehow the vaccine schedule got way out of whack, and
Speaker 1: the vaccines are disappointingly ineffective. So, for instance, the flu
Speaker 1: shot last year paper published by Chung and colleagues mmw
Speaker 1: R sixteen percent vaccine efficacy that was statistically insignificant from zero,
Speaker 1: meaning last year's flu shot was a complete waste for everybody.
Speaker 1: The new Maccacal thirteen valent new Macacal vaccine published in
Speaker 1: Gamma's vaccine efficacy against hospitalization and death was nine statistically
Speaker 1: insignificant from zero. So these vaccines that have been advanced
Speaker 1: out there are very very effective. And I'm like you,
Speaker 1: I'm done with vaccines. I have sales and I'm not
Speaker 1: taking skipping the flu shot. It's it's it's not worth it.
Speaker 1: Even if the rarest side effect happens, You've gotten a
Speaker 1: side effect and you've had no theoretical profit. Now I'm
Speaker 1: approaching it from the standpoint of you're just trying to
Speaker 1: make money off of me, even if it negatively impacts
Speaker 1: my health. So you know, unless I truly need something,
Speaker 1: I'm just going to opt out and then also do
Speaker 1: what we really should be have been focusing on this
Speaker 1: entire time, is actual health. You know, eat healthy, work out,
Speaker 1: you know, be outside, get your vitamin D, like, live
Speaker 1: a healthy lifestyle, which would create a lot more you know,
Speaker 1: positive impact than you know, giving people a vaccine that
Speaker 1: could be potentially injuring them for a virus that isn't
Speaker 1: a threat to their life. Like, get outside, lose weight,
Speaker 1: be healthy. That's a very good summer. You know. I
Speaker 1: was doing research with stars Kobe too, I'm an internist
Speaker 1: and cardiologist in practice in Dallas, but I was one
Speaker 1: of the first investigation on drug applications. I'm widely known
Speaker 1: to the FDA into government officials, and you know, the
Speaker 1: White House had called me early in the pandemic for help,
Speaker 1: and so um, I knew I was taking risk because
Speaker 1: I was working in this area. So I intentionally lost
Speaker 1: weight and ran and got fit and strong. I knew
Speaker 1: I was going to get tagged a chair enough. I
Speaker 1: got COVID and I got one of the early severe
Speaker 1: strains I did get in an FDA approved early treatment
Speaker 1: protocol did involve my lungs. But you know, I made
Speaker 1: a video showing, you know, I could jog. After about
Speaker 1: eight days, I was really short of breath, but I
Speaker 1: could do that, got outside, and then we learned over
Speaker 1: time boy losing weight exercise so important, emphasized vitamin D, virus,
Speaker 1: cydal masal washes. That was a huge breakthrough. Everybody coming
Speaker 1: down with the cold nowadays should have delut pavadon i
Speaker 1: dine or dilut hydrogen peroxided, squired it up the nose,
Speaker 1: sniff it back and spit it out. That is now
Speaker 1: survival number one I carried with me when I traveled.
Speaker 1: Anytime you get viral works for flu, works for COVID,
Speaker 1: works for restaurants and social virus. It is the way
Speaker 1: to go. We should never let a coal old fester
Speaker 1: up in our nose and get tons of congestion for
Speaker 1: days and days and days without doing something about it.
Speaker 1: That is a giant mistake. We should never sit and
Speaker 1: let a sore throat develop for two or three days,
Speaker 1: and then with the nasal condition, we should be gargling
Speaker 1: every every four to six hours, scope or listering and
Speaker 1: kill the virus in the back of the throat by
Speaker 1: reducing that viral burden. We make illnesses mild by being
Speaker 1: fit and strong. Even if we get severe cases like
Speaker 1: I had some pulmonary involvement, I was nowhere near being hospitalized.
Speaker 1: I was out jogging by by day, so it's certainly
Speaker 1: possible enough. I was obese, had diabetes, was weak and frail.
Speaker 1: I could have been on the mechanical ventilator in the hospital.
Speaker 1: It's so clear being fit and strong makes a giant difference.
Speaker 1: I've managed people in their nineties through this illness with
Speaker 1: the combination of early treatment protocols and the fitness and
Speaker 1: wellness concepts that you've put forward well. And also now
Speaker 1: we're finding out that long COVID is not because you know,
Speaker 1: then there was the push about the vaccines is to
Speaker 1: prevent long COVID, and then we're finding out that, you know,
Speaker 1: one covid is not what they're making it to be
Speaker 1: well long COVID about people with serious COVID hospitalized end
Speaker 1: up with some residual symptoms, and then the lesser percent
Speaker 1: about patients, but the vaccines make people feel sicker than
Speaker 1: long covid. The CBC V safe data. Again, the CEC
Speaker 1: was refusing to release this to America. Finally, under court order,
Speaker 1: it was released to the and GEO i CAN and
Speaker 1: then Aaron Syrie representing that group came on Fox News
Speaker 1: on primetime and gave the results. This was, I think
Speaker 1: the vaccines incapacitate people. They can't go to work the
Speaker 1: next day, the after and seven to eight percent of
Speaker 1: them have to go to the e r and become hospitalized.
Speaker 1: That's acute. That's way worse than long COVID. So we
Speaker 1: would never take a vaccine and end up in the
Speaker 1: e r B hospitalized because we're trying to prevent long COVID.
Speaker 1: These are ridiculous suggestions, that ridiculous claims. So the vaccines
Speaker 1: have a cute tuck cicity. I've already covered myocarditis. Now
Speaker 1: the FDA, two years too late, admits the vaccines caused
Speaker 1: blood clots. And I've never seen so many blood clots
Speaker 1: in my practice ever. And the blood clots occur, they're
Speaker 1: large ones. They shoot to the lungs that can be fatal.
Speaker 1: They occur on the venus side, the arterial side. We've
Speaker 1: seen public figure after public figure go down with blood clots.
Speaker 1: Al Boker, the weatherman on TV or in current Street
Speaker 1: ESPN announced Dion Sanders, former football player, of blood clots
Speaker 1: in this artail system, shooting to his toes. Amputations. The
Speaker 1: blood clouding situation is horrendous. And finally our FDA is
Speaker 1: admitting to this um watch out for anybody at risk
Speaker 1: for blood clots and taking these vaccines. But did we
Speaker 1: find out that for a long COVID it's about the
Speaker 1: same as you know when you have other respiratory infections
Speaker 1: in terms of what happens to your body after that,
Speaker 1: well serious infections. People who have hair changes, women can
Speaker 1: lose hair and nail changes. Feel tired. I think COVID
Speaker 1: is unique because the virus stays in the body so long.
Speaker 1: There's a autopy study by talent colleagues from the NIH
Speaker 1: showing the viruses in the body for many months after
Speaker 1: the infection. A lot of people don't realize this, So
Speaker 1: you feel tired and there's a recovery period. There's not
Speaker 1: much can be done about it. But the vaccine makes
Speaker 1: long COVID much worse because it gives an extra installation
Speaker 1: of the spite protein and then increases these risks. Remember
Speaker 1: COVID is a risk for blood clotty. Now you take
Speaker 1: the vaccine. Now you have double or triple the risk
Speaker 1: of blood clott and then you get get COVID again
Speaker 1: and then take more vaccines. We have never administered vaccines
Speaker 1: every couple of months for an illness and get the
Speaker 1: illness and keep taking the shots. That's another thing people
Speaker 1: should recognize. That's nuts. Can you imagine getting months, then
Speaker 1: taking a month's vaccine, and then getting months again, then
Speaker 1: taking another months vaccine. We would never consider doing that,
Speaker 1: So you know that right now something is completely off
Speaker 1: the rails. You see, Rachelle Lewinski, are our presidents people
Speaker 1: taking vaccines, they've already had the illness. Nobody should be
Speaker 1: doing it. The former president Trump did that, and the
Speaker 1: question on the table is what is he thinking? What
Speaker 1: is his doctors thinking? I mean, not of it makes
Speaker 1: its sense to me. How you know, They're like, oh,
Speaker 1: I got COVID, but I'm they got a vaccinated double
Speaker 1: boosted and you're like, well you still got you know,
Speaker 1: like it doesn't make sense. Uh. This has been extremely informative, doctor,
Speaker 1: you know one where can people go and find your work?
Speaker 1: And then too, is there anything else you'd like to
Speaker 1: leave us with? Well, thanks for having us on the show,
Speaker 1: and you're doing such a great job out there, young
Speaker 1: and dynamic and I'm sure your audience is huge. Please
Speaker 1: go on my website Peter McCullough MD dot com that
Speaker 1: gives links to all the social media I have, I
Speaker 1: think the top doctor account on Twitter. I've been reinstated
Speaker 1: on Twitter and many people follow me there. I have
Speaker 1: a podcast, my own show America on Loud Talk Radio,
Speaker 1: mccullo Report twice on Saturday twice on Study on the
Speaker 1: podcast network. That's very highly rated and popular. I go
Speaker 1: worldwide on anstence is a worldwide problem. I want to
Speaker 1: hear from doctors who are innovating all over the world.
Speaker 1: We take the nation's questions on COVID, which is very
Speaker 1: important every Wednesday on Pulse on America out Loud. Have
Speaker 1: a very popular subject called Courageous Discourse. I write with
Speaker 1: best selling author John Leek, and we've also teamed up
Speaker 1: for a book what's doing very well called Courage to
Speaker 1: Face COVID nineteen, which is the only book in COVID
Speaker 1: that's written by a full time real author who can
Speaker 1: write a gripping narrative and explains how I got involved
Speaker 1: the White House and the US Senate and you know,
Speaker 1: how did I set all the records on Joe Rogan
Speaker 1: and Laura Ingram and Tucker Carlson. It keeps going on
Speaker 1: and on. How did all this happen? This is the
Speaker 1: story of all time And the only way we're going
Speaker 1: to get out of this is when the vaccines are
Speaker 1: completely dropped and we treat the remaining cases and we're
Speaker 1: going to have to pick up the pieces with deep
Speaker 1: investigation on who is behind all this and who's going
Speaker 1: to be responsible for the injuries, of the disabilities and
Speaker 1: the deaths have occurred, both with the COVID nineteen and
Speaker 1: with the vaccines. Well, sir, I hope you know how
Speaker 1: much you're appreciated. Uh, we need leaders like you. I
Speaker 1: know it's not been easy, So thank you for what
Speaker 1: you've done and for speaking out. It's truly appreciated and
Speaker 1: I think you're going to be remembered in history as
Speaker 1: one of the guys who helped, you know, rewrite this.
Speaker 1: So thank you so much for everything you've done. Thanks
Speaker 1: for having me. Ye that was Dr Peter McCalla. Thank
Speaker 1: God for him and his voice and all of this
Speaker 1: and trying to bring some sanity to a world of insanity.
Speaker 1: Want to thank you guys at home for listening. I
Speaker 1: want to thank John Cassio, my producer, for putting this
Speaker 1: all together every Monday every Thursday, but you can listen
Speaker 1: throughout the week. Please leave us a review, give of
Speaker 1: reading on Apple podcasts. I love to read those as well.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for listening.