WEBVTT - RERUN: What was Web 2.0?

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com. Hey guys, and welcome to tex Stuff.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works in my Heart Radio and I love

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 1>all things tech. And today we're going to listen to

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>another classic episode. Because I'm still on vacation, I will

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>be back very soon, but today we're going to look

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>back on what was a real big buzzword or I

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>guess buzz phrase back in the day, which was web

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>two point oh that was used to describe lots of stuff.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a fairly vague term. So in this episode

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I go into explain what was web two point oh?

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>What was the whole concept behind that. I hope you

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>enjoy this classic episode what is web two point oh?

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think we've had enough time since then to

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>really take a look back and explore what the concept

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of web two point was and what if anything is

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>taking its place, and does the term mean anything? Was

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it just kind of a placeholder. It's gonna be a

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of opinion in this because it's from my own

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>personal perspective, but honestly, if you've heard the term web

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>two point oh, and you always wondered what that meant.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want to cover today. But to start off,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to look at a history of the web itself.

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure you all know that the Web and

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the Internet are two different things, but just in case,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>let's lay down that groundwork. Now, the Internet refers to

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>the network of networks, this gigantic network of computer networks

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>that are all interconnected together. There's a series of connections

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that allows computers to communicate with one another. So this

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is an enormous system that allows all kinds of different

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>types of communication to go across it. And back in

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the day, we used to talk about the Internet in

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the terms of the information super highway. You might be

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>familiar with that term. So it was kind of the

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure that allowed rapid communication across the globe and allowed

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>people who were on one computer network to communicate directly

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with people who are on a totally separate computer network

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 1>because of this interconnectivity. Now the Web is just one

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>way to send and consume information on that super highway.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So you can think of it as a vehicle that

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>shares the super highway with other vehicles. So the Web

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>would be like a giant bus. And then you might

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have a freight train that's or not freight train, but

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a freight truck that's driving right next to it. That's

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>file transfer protocol, or a bunch of mail vehicles in

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a I L that would stand for email, that kind

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. These would all be traveling along the Internet.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>None of them are the Internet. They're just a means

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of communication that exists because the Internet is the platform

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>upon which they exist. So you access the Web through

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a web browser. Big shock there, I'm sure we usually

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>refer to that as the client. Your machine with the

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>web browser is the client, and the browser or client

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>lets you request information from another machine on the Internet,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>which we call a server. The server receives your request

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in response to it sends the relevant data back to you.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>And all of that has done through a visual interface.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you've got something rendered out as uh,

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, something that's easy to to interpret and consume

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>within the browser, as opposed to a text based approach

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, marred by lots of code that

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>might be really confusing to you. Now, the path taken

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>by your request and the returning information isn't set in stone,

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so this is different from roads. This is where the

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>road analogy really breaks down, because if you have a

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>set of roads between you and your destination, you might

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to take a detour, or perhaps two detours.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>If things are really bad, let's say there's flooding, you

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>can't get to where you are going using your normal routes.

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But the way the Internet goes it's way more robust

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>than that. The information is delivered via packets. The packets

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all can travel different pathways to get to their destination,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>whereupon everything gets put back together and displayed for you.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not just for Web information. That's for all

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>information going across the Internet traffic. But it's uh one

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why the Internet is so useful. It's

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to worry if there is a

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>break in the communication lines between you and the web

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>server because the data can route around. That very important

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have machines that are constantly going on and offline.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So back to the web. Now, the birthplace of the

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>World Wide Web is CERN. That's the same organization that

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>oversees the large hadron colliders. So we're talking particle physics

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and loll cats all because of CERN. Thanks CERN specifically

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>say thanks to Tim berners Lee, who developed what would

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>become the basis of the Worldwide Web on a Next computer.

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And uh, in case you're not familiar with what Next

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is or was, really, it was a computer platform developed

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>by Steve Jobs after he had been forced from Apple.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So Apple forced Steve Jobs out of the company or

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs quit, depending upon the person telling the story,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, Steve Jobs then went on to

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>found a new company called Next and develop a new

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>type of computer. Eventually he would come back to Apple. Essentially,

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple begged Steve Jobs to return just as Apple was

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on the brink of bankruptcy, and Next kind of faded away.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But it was the Next computer that Tim burners Lee

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>was using to develop web pages and the first web browser.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the first website was built in nine by

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Tim berners Lee, and he hosted it on his own computer.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That site contained information about the purpose and structure of

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the web, so kind of an explanation of what the

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>web would be capable of, and also a set of

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>instructions on how to create your own web server, because

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously the web is only really useful if other people

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>start to join on Otherwise it's just kind of a

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just logging remotely to someone else's computer.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not that exciting now. The browser he built was

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>called Worldwide Web. Just where we get that from, and

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>things continued along a lot of research centers and students

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>began to get access to the world Wide Web. But

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>things really took off on April three. That's when uh

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>CERN decided to release the Web to the general public,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning they made the information itself on how the web

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>works public and open. Along with the open license for

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the Web, SERN offered a basic browser and a library

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of code to help things move along, and it didn't

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>take long for other organizations and eventually people and companies

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to join in. So also in three, the National Center

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for super Computing Applications or in c s A released

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Mosaic one point oh, and that became the first web

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>browser to really find popularity among the general public. At

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this point, most of the people using the web were

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>still researchers and students, but gradually people outside of these

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>groups began to learn of the Web. It started to

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get press coverage, and people began to get excited by

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this concept of a computer network that you could access

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and find real information and communicate with people in real time.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And here's a funny note. During this time, I was

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in college, and my first impression of the Web at

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that time was that it was slow, and it was

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>unattractive and it was superfluous. I had become used to

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>browsing the Internet using other means like tell net to

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>connect to chat rooms or games or whatever, or even

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>not full Internet access things like Bolton board systems, and

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that the graphical approach to the Web

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>was completely unnecessary and slow things down. The browser had

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to take time to get the information and render the

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff you needed to see, and at the time, the

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet connectivity and the power of computers meant that that

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff took ages. And I just thought, well, who wants

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to sit around forever to try and get this information

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>when you could get it so much faster using FTP

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or tell net or whatever it may be, depending upon

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the kind of information you're interested in. So I thought

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Web was probably a flash in the pan. It

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>would not be the last time I'd be radically wrong

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>about the technology you think I'd learned. At any rate,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>by the Web was making headlines and e commerce became

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a thing One of the earliest examples I could find

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was that Pizza Hut sold a pizza online, actually allowing

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>customers to order pizza in some areas using the web.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>The company Yahoo was founded around this time too, and

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>its main purpose at that time was to serve as

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>just a search engine to help search for the content

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on the web, making it easier for people to find

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff they wanted. Before search engines, it was pretty tough.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You had to be kind of you kind of had

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to be part of the click that understood how the

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>web worked. Now today, we're all used to things like

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you r l s where you have to type in

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a web address. In fact, there may be a couple

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of websites that you still navigate to by typing in

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the web address, but not everyone is comfortable with that.

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So search engines made it much easier for people to

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.479
<v Speaker 1>interact with the web without having to memorize the protocol

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>that they would need in order to visit a specific website. Now,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>much later than the early nineties, we look back on

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the webs sites of this era as being pre Web

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>two point oh. For the most part, you could probably

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>call them web one point oh, but that's what we

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>call a retroonym, meaning we named it after the thing

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>had already happened. Uh. And it's kind of like World

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>War One. While World War One was going on, no

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>one referred to it as World War One. There had

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>not been a World War two yet, there'd be no

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>reason to call it world War one unless you expected

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>there to be another one, so you might use something else,

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like the Great War. Uh. And it was only in

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in a you know, in retrospect, when World War Two

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>broke out, that World War One really got that name.

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>So what actually defines web one point oh? For lack

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of a better term, Not everyone even thinks web one

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>point oh is is a thing at all? Like it?

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense, but some people will use

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that term. But wasn't actually described well. The websites in

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>those days. Most of them were actually static pages, which

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>means you would navigate to a page and see what

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 1>was there, and after doing that, there'd probably be very

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>little reason to ever return to that page because it's

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty much the same. Uh. It's kind

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>of like the equivalent of a magazine or a book.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you go and you read a magazine

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and you close the magazine, then you come back to it,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and you open it up to the same page, it's

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be the same magazine article. It doesn't change

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>from one moment to the next. That's the way a

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of websites were in the early days. We're gonna

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>make this episode even more dynamic and interactive in just

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a moment, but first, let's take a quick break. Those

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>web pages didn't have any way for visitors to have

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>any kind of meaningful interaction on the site. At most,

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there might be a visitor counter that would click up

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a notch each time someone navigated to the website, and

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>those were a huge deal early on. I don't know

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if you guys remember, but I remember lots of websites

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>having a visitor counter, and they took it as a

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>matter of pride when they passed a arbitrary milestone like

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>five thousand visitors or something like that. But there was

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>no way to leave comments or have any other impact

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on the site for the most part for these types

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of web pages. Now there were exceptions. Some websites were

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to updating content regularly, or they were allowing people

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to leave their own contributions, or even both of those

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>things at the same time. There was a student at

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Swarthmore College named Justin Hall who started up a web page,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and originally it was just a collection of links that

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>he thought were particularly interesting. The website was called Justin's Links,

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and not long after he started the site, he actually

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>saw the potential to do something more with it than

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>just show a collection of links, and he saw it

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>as a way to publish his thoughts to a global audience,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an online journal, and a lot of

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people point to Justin's Links as being the first blog uh.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This sort of approach of using the web as sort

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of a dynamic communication tool set the side apart from

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the web pages that were around at

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the same time, but many sites lacked that sort of

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>dynamic approach, and at the same time, companies began to

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>rush the web in hopes of beating competitors to the punch.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 1>The web was viewed as kind of a Wild West

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>type of territory in which a company could stake its

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>claim online and stand to make a ton of money

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in the short term before everyone else caught up. Simultaneously,

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>several companies emerged that used the web as the very

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>foundation for the company itself. Some of them offered goods

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>or services to consumers, so normal people who are just

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>using the web themselves. Others were targeting other companies and

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>they were offering up services meant to help businesses succeed.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But many of these lacked any sort of cohesive business plan,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>which caused a big problem. They were offering up services

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that some people found helpful, but they didn't have any

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>way of making money. And this obviously is not something

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just gone away. We've seen this with lots of

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>different services, some of which exists solely as a means

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to try and get acquired by other larger businesses. UH,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>which can work if you have a great idea for

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a service or app that people are going to really

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoy using, but you don't have a way of generating

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>money from that. It might just be good enough to

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of attention and then wait for someone

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to offer to buy you. You know, maybe they'll figure

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>out a way of using it, or maybe they'll pair

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it with stuff they already have, and that's how it

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>makes money. But back then, not having a plan just

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really working for people. Towards the end of the

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety nineties, web companies were sprouting up all over the place,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and investors were really excited at the opportunity to get

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in on the ground floor of something that had the

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>potential to become huge, meaning you could stand to become

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a millionaire overnight with some of these opportunities, and they

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>began to flood startup companies with cash. More than a

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>few of those startup companies ended up with way more

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>money than what they needed, and that encouraged some bad

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>decisions on the part of founders. A lot of founders

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>began to spend that excess cash by creating lavish headquarters

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or crazy benefits for employees. Meanwhile, their businesses still didn't

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have a way of making revenue. So, in other words,

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you want to open up a lemonade stand,

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and normally you would just need a few dollars to

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>buy some lemons and some sugar. You get some water,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you put all that together. Maybe you get

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a little poster board to write up a sign. So

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're starting budget is twenty dollars and you're selling

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it for cents a cup, and you figure out that

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>after certain number of cups, you know you've got plenty

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of of of supply. There after certain number of cups,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you're going to break even. Uh, and then after that's

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>all profit and you've got enough to make a decent

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>profit over your investment. Well, now imagine that you are

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>opening up that lemonade stand, but someone's given you twenty

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars and you don't have any way of scaling

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>up your operation, so you just spend that extra money

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on a really nice lemonade stand and you know, a

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>super nifty titanium lemon crusher, that kind of stuff. It

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help you make money in the long run. It

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>just means that's how you spent your your startup cash.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of companies fell into this trap. You can

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>read about startups dot com industries in the late nineties

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and how ridiculously lavish some of their offices were, and

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a mess. So compounding that problem was the

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that a lot of these companies were rewarding employees

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>by giving them shares of the company. Now, if everything

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was working, fine, that's great, because those shares are worth

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>real money. Once you get to a point where the

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>employees are allowed to sell those shares, usually there's a

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>period where employees are not allowed to do that sort

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of thing until they get to a particular point in

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal year. But here's where the real problems came in,

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of these companies began to falter when

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>people realized, hey, they don't really have a way of

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>making money and they can only keep treading water with

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>investment money for so long before everything falls apart. And

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it was like a house of cards. It all fell down,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't all fall down on a single day.

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's a particular day you can point

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to and say this is the day the bubble burst,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the bubble meaning this speculation bubble of the value of

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com companies. Instead, it happened over a course of

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>years from nine thousand one essentially, and during that time,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>people began to get more suspicious of dot com companies

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that began to ask harder questions. The companies themselves were

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to run out of that investment money, and because

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't found a way to generate enough revenue, they

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stay afloat, and a lot of them went completely

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>out of business. Some of them took serious hits to

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>their value. Amazon dot Com, for example, was around in

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>those days and for a while had shares that were

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in the triple digit value, like over a hundred dollars

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a share, but after the bubble burst it dropped to

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>less than ten dollars a share. Huge drop. But companies

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like Amazon were large enough and and savvy enough to

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>wade through that time and emerge out the other side.

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Not all companies were so lucky, And the worst part

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of this is that those employees who had worked so

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hard and had been rewarded in stock now found themselves

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with worthless stock. The companies were bankrupt, so the shares

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>were not worth anything, and that was a huge issue.

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>So you had all these people who, for a while

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on paper were millionaires and then suddenly they were broke,

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or at least they weren't millionaires anymore. Many dot com

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>companies went on to business um and those that stayed

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>around people wanted to try and figure out, well, what

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>what set them apart, what made them different? How did

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>these companies survive, How did these websites make it through

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble burst while so many others went away?

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the term web two point oh really

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>comes into play. Now. Personally, I think it's a dumb term.

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible. It suggests a chronological order, so it would

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>suggest that there was first Web one point oh and

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>then at some point there was a Web two point

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>oh release. Because it's very similar to the way we

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>look at software, for example, we're operating systems, but that's

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not what this means. It's not the way it works.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's ultimately more confusing than helpful. But

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what we have, uh. And the truth is that

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>both websites that were more in the Web one point

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>oh frame than the Web two point oh frame and

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Web two point o websites existed at the same time.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>In other words, this wasn't chronological. You can't point to

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a date and say after this time all the websites

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>were Web two point oh. Even back in with Justin's links,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we start seeing Web two point oh philosophy working its

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>way into websites, and that was years before the dot

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>com bubble burst. So it's problematic using this term. But

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, we need to look at what actually happened,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>like why is this term around in the first place,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's because of the O'Reilly Media company. So in

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four, Tim O'Reilly, who was the founder of

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>O'Reilly Media, and Dale Dougherty, who was a VP and

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>O'Reilly we're having a brainstorming session. They were trying to

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>come up with a an event that could really focus

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on what makes a web company successful? Why were some

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>web companies able to survive while so many others failed.

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>What were the mistakes that the older websites made or

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the failed websites made, and what were the success stories?

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And so they started trying to think, well, how are

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we going to define this, what's the what's the way

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we create a catchy term to explain the new philosophy

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of the web, the one that survived. And that's where

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they came up with the term web two point oh.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And that was it. It was just to give a

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>name to a summit, the Web two point o Summit,

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>which took place in two thousand four, and they had

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>several since then. But they just wanted a way to say,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>these are the type of websites that did all right

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>throughout the dot com by verse. These are the ones

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that had the traits that allowed them to survive. Now,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in general, the qualities that define web two point oh

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>are that they tend to be dynamic pages rather than

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>static ones, meaning that there's a reason for you to

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at it again. It's not something

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a page out of the encyclopedia

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and it never ever changes. That makes it Web two

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>point oh. Another is that there tends to be some

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>way for users to generate content and submit it to

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the website. That may be something along the lines of blogging,

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>where the users are journaling using the web page as

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a place for their journal to go. Or it might

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be social media site where they're just reaching out to

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>friends or sharing links or stories or jokes or whatever.

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Or it might be something more akin to Amazon, where

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>users are able to review products that they've purchased, and

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that adds value to Amazon because us future customers can

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>look at those reviews and make judgments, and then they

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>too can contribute to this system, and that makes the

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>whole experience of using Amazon more pleasant and robust and

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>useful to both the company and the consumer. These are

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of things that became known as the web

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>two point oh qualities. This dynamic approach with user generated content,

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff that could be syndicated and be sent out across

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>multiple platforms. All of that was wrapped up in this,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, it does in fact cover things

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like social media sites. If you look back on the

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>timeline of the major social media sites, they all emerged

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>after the dot Com bubble burst. There really weren't any

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>sites that kind of fall into that social media category

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the way we think of today pre dot Com bubble burst.

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of them were around right around then, like live journal,

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but even then you would you could argue live Journal

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>was more of a blogging site and less of a

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>social media site. Things like Friendster and MySpace and Facebook,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>all of those emerged after the dot Com bubble burst.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>But they also embrace the philosophy of what O'Reilly was

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>calling web two point oh because those sites they aren't

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>valuable on their own. I mean, you don't go to

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to see what Facebook has put up. You go

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook to see what your friends are saying, or

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to say something to your friends. It's the people who

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>are using the site that give it value, and that's

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a big part of web two point oh. It and

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it takes a lot of the pressure off

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of the person creating the website. They have to make

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it attractive enough for people to adopt it. But then

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you just let the people make it important and you

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>step back. Same thing is true for Twitter. Twitter just

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>facilitates communication. It's the people using Twitter that make it useful.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If no one jumped on Twitter, it wouldn't be around.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>There are other services that were similar to Twitter, some

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of which people thought were superior to Twitter, but they

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't get adopted as quickly, and they, for the most part,

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>are not around anymore. While we're on our journey to

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Web three point oh, I guess let's uh, let's take

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>arrest here. We're gonna take a quick break to thank

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>our sponsor. So Web two point oh kind of points

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to this idea of embracing the consumer as a an

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>integral part of your web presence. They're not just an audience,

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They're a contributor in some way. And you could argue

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the web two point oh isn't so much an evolution

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as it is just a different approach to creating an

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>experience on the web, which also makes it difficult to

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>talk about what comes next. I mean, is there a

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>web three point oh? Does that even mean anything? Now?

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that we definitely have seen more evolution

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on the web since O'Reilly coined the web two point

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>oh term, particularly when it comes to stuff like data tracking,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that's huge, way bigger than it was in the mid

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand's. Because of data tracking, sites can customize a

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>user's experience and serve up advertising that is calculated to

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>be more effective for that user. And depending upon the implementation,

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>data tracking can be downright scary. And it turns out

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to share that much data before a

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>computer can figure out who you are. Stuff that seems

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really general, like just a zip code, can be enough

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to narrow down just a few candidates. So if I

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>put my zip code in and I have just maybe

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>two or three other points of data, that might be

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>enough for an algorithm to really narrow down between me

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and maybe one or two other people who I could

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>possibly be. It's actually pretty, you know, surprising, how little

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>information you need to share for that sort of stuff

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Also, we know that data tracking can be misused,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>either intentionally or not. There's the story about Target sending

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the young woman uh some a young woman some some

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>coupons for expected mothers, and her father found out about

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it and was really upset at Target because he thought

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they had misidentified her. His daughter as being pregnant, and

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 1>then later on he found out that in fact she

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>was pregnant. But the whole point of that is that

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Target was trying to be proactive and helpful, but in

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>fact caused a ruckus. It was a little too overenthusiastic

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>of a response, as it turns out, and that's largely

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>due to data tracking. You don't even have to identify

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a person or to create a problem. It's not like

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Target knew specifically who this young lady was. They just

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>identified that based upon our searches, she must be pregnant.

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a problem. And we're seeing data tracking used and

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>everything from innocent or at least seemingly innocent approaches like, well,

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you bought this one product, so here are five other

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>products that you will probably like based upon your preferences

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen so far. That's not that creepy, But

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>there are other approaches where data tracking is downright sinister.

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And I would argue that's a major part of the

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>web experience now, whether you're aware of it or not,

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's definitely something that has evolved since Web two

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>point oh. But another real jump in the evolution of

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the web comes to us because of mobile devices. Now.

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>O'Reilly recognized the importance of mobile devices all the way

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand four. O'Reilly Media said that interoperability

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>was one of the features of Web two point one

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of the cornerstones of the philosophy, meaning that you should

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to access this web page from multiple platforms,

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a computer or a mobile device of some

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sort or something else. Now, in two thousand and four,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there were really not that many devices that you could

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>use to connect to the web non in a meaningful way.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the phones that were out there were

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>more like, you know, they have text browsers for the web,

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>so you could read some text on certain web pages.

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty limited. It wasn't until the smartphone really

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>took off here in the United States. That means it

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was after the introduction of the iPhone that you really

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>started seeing that. So you get to a point now

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>where more and more people are using mobile devices to

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>access the web. I meant that web developers had to

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>make sure they were paying closer attention to the mobile

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>experience because if they ignored it, then a larger portion

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of their audience was going to get upset with how

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>how clunky or unpleasant it was to access the website

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>using a mobile device, and in fact it's more important

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>than ever now. Uh. Just recently we've seen mobile browsing

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>outpace desktop browsing. In other words, more more website visits

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>are coming from mobile devices than desktop computers. That happened

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>for the first time about a year ago, a little

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>more than a year ago, and now we're seeing that

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>more people are using mobile devices to access the web. Now,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that people have slacked off of using

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>desktop computers or laptops. People still are using those devices.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you look at the trends, they're still

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>increasing year over year. So in two thousand fifteen, there

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>are more people accessing the web on desktops than there

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>were in two thousand fourteen. It's just that the growth

0:30:55.400 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of mobile devices has skyrocketed, so it has outpaced the

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>growth of desktops, so both of them are up. It's

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just mobile devices have increased much faster than desktop has.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But that means you have to pay attention to the

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>experience that your customers have. Your audience has both on

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>mobile and on desktop. You want to make sure that

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it is attractive and usable and that people are able

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to get the experience they want depending up. You know,

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter what platform they happen to be using, whether

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a tablet or a smartphone, or a console or

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>uh desktop computer, it needs to be a satisfying experience.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So I would argue that is now really a defining

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>feature of the web. And if I had to define

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>web three point oh, I'd likely argue that it has

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with both the data tracking and the mobile

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>devices more than pretty much anything else. But web experiences

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are becoming more customized to the individual browsers. So that

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>could mean that one day will move into the era

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the semantic web. Now, the semantic web is where

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>your experience will be very much personalized, and the web

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>itself will understand what it is you want to see

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>based upon context, word choice, your preferences, all of these

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>things that are wrapped up in things like data tracking

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and understanding of natural language, that kind of stuff. We're

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of development in that area. So maybe

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>one day we'll have a semantic web where when I

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about surfing the web and when you talk about

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>serving the web, it will be two very different stories

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because of our different styles. That's a possibility, but I

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>also think it's really likely we're gonna see the web

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>experience fracture as more services attempt to leverage various platforms.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Now what do I mean by that? It's starting to

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>sound like I'm talking business talk. But here's the simple

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>example that I'll use to illustrate my point. Think about Netflix.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So net extreaming has seen a ton of success over

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the past few years. Put aside their their library of

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>movies and television series, which obviously mean that's that's problematic,

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but the adoption of Netflix has been phenomenal, and I

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>would argue that our large reason for that is because

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you weren't limited to computers or mobile devices to access Netflix.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You can access it on set top boxes, on video

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>game consoles, and more. Pretty much if the device was

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>capable of connecting to the internet. Netflix made sure it

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>could have some kind of platform on that device. They

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.959
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get on everything they possibly could, and it

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>meant that they had widespread adoption. Beyond that, they were

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>really smart on the back end. They built out a

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>system so that you could have a kind of seamless

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>experience moving from one device to another. So if I

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>start watching a movie under my Netflix account, on my

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>laptop computer, and then I come home and I turn

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on my video game console and I launched my Netflix app.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I can pick up where I left off because on

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the back end, it's tracking everything. The same is true

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>for other services like YouTube. It's another great example. There

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>are YouTube smartphone apps and tablet apps and video game

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>console apps, and uh, that's the same sort of thing.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>My experience on one can translate over to another so

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that I can keep on building out this profile of

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what I like, and YouTube will continuously suggest other videos

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that are similar to ones that I've really enjoyed, which

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>might be why I have so many videos of dogs

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>on skateboards, or that could just be coincidence. I don't

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>really understand how it works behind the scenes. At any rate,

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting to me that that could potentially be

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the new era. It's not so much a Web three

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>point oh as it could be a let's, you know,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>let's look at how we can make our service across

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all different platforms so people can access it however they want,

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and that goes beyond Web. In fact, Web might be

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>too limited a term to use for that sort of thing,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>which means we kind of need a new term for it.

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>We need to come up with a word that explains

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 1>this particular world one where you have these services that

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>go across all sorts of platforms, allowing you to access

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it however you like. And I think I've come up

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>with a name. I'm calling it Frank. Frank's nice name.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Robin Day's got a hedgehog called Frank. But seriously, I'd

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>rather just kind of ditch the web two point oh

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>term altogether, which might be a moot point. I don't

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>know that anyone's still talking about web two point oh. Seriously,

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a non term at this point. But

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to just erase it because I think web

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>two point oh was too confusing a term. I think

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it misled people. It It compares the Web to things

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like software patches or software versions, and that's not accurate. Um,

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I really wish we could come up with a different

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>phrase for that particular the idea that doesn't suggest an evolution,

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>because it really was kind of a divergent path, not

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>so much that one evolved into the other, but one

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>approach was more successful than the other. I hope you

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>guys enjoyed that classic episode of tech Stuff. If you

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>have any suggestions for future episodes, you can contact me,

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>write me at tech stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>or pop on by our website that's tech stuff podcast

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com that has links to our social media presence,

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>also has links to the entire archive of all of

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>our episodes and a link to our online store, where

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>every purchase you make goes to help the show and

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we greatly appreciate it, and I'll talk to you again

0:36:53.400 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>really soon from more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that how stuff works dot com. M