WEBVTT - Never Grow Old

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, welcome to the Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future. It says, you're older

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>than you've ever been, and now you're even older. I'm

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strick and I'm Joe McCormick. And so today you

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>can probably guess that we're gonna be talking about aging,

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and specifically, since you probably know what kind of show

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this is, technological and scientific responses to aging. What do

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>we do with the issue of aging as a as

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a techno scientific culture. Do we do we just let

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it happen and study how it happens? Heck, no, Joe,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we do. We try to do something about it. We

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we we grab onto the sand and we make tracks

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>with our fingers as the cold approach of time drags

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>us ever onward toward oblivion. That's what we do. So,

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like a cat towards a cat carrying, let's mix some metaphors.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I like it. So this isn't the first time we've

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about this. Back in June, we did a couple

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of episodes on various forms of technological immortality, though I

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think we were covering some other issues they're like, you know,

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>would you want to have your consciousness put into a

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>computer and stuff like that. Uh. And so one of

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the episodes was called who Wants to Live Forever? And

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the other one was more focused on something along the

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>lines of what we're gonna be talking about today, which

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>was the theories of the gerontologist Aubrey de Gray, and

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that podcast, quite stupidly, was called Shades of Degray. I

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think that was my choice here. I think that was

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>my call. Well, we we're gonna be talking a lot

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>about decay today. We talked about Degray in that episode,

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously quite extensively, and some of the stuff we're going

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to cover is probably going to be a little bit

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of a repetition of you know, it has been a minute,

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so we thought that we would revisit the topic. Also,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think it's safe to say that

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>all of us know how to speak better now. I

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>was about to say talk better, and I caught myself

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>more more good now ish. Uh So, Okay, So so

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to talk about the research being done,

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and then in the second part we're going to talk

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about the reasons why there's this ridiculously heated debate, or

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe not ridiculously like like, maybe it's a very human

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>debate to be having about anti aging research and treatments

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and the whole perspective on the thing, because you hear

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>so many different things from so many different groups, and

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>who can you trust. We'll get to that in the

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>next episode. For now, scientifically speaking, what is aging? It's

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a good question. It's one of those things

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>where you know it when you see it, but can

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you describe exactly what it is? Yeah, So here's the problem, right, Um,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>there is no full understanding in the realm of science

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of everything that goes into aging. We understand elements of aging,

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We understand some of the cause and effect of certain

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>aspects of aging, but when you look at aging as

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>an overall condition, we don't have a full understanding of

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what that is. Yeah. And one of the other things

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that you might have trouble with

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>such a macroscopic effect as aging um in distinguishing causes

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>from effects. For example, one thing we know is not

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a cause of aging, but you could say, since it correlates,

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is that aging is caused by hair turning gray. If

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you didn't understand that, it went the other way around.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>You could get confused on this point, and there are

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>some issues where it's not quite so clear. And there

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are also some conditions and diseases that could end up

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>exacerbating the effects of aging or perhaps replicating the effects

0:03:55.520 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of aging without itself being aging. So you know that

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that also throws in more confusion into the mix. Yeah,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but one of the biggest concepts in aging is something

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that figures into what we talked about in that episode

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about Aubrey De Gray. Aubrey De Gray's program UH is

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a program for engineering negligible sinescence. What is sescence. Sinescence

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is the idea, and generally this this refers to growing

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>old and deteriorating in power with age, but at the

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>cellular level, senescence has a more specific definition. So your

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>body tissues remain healthy and strong over the years by

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>replenishing themselves through cell division. Cells divide and make new,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 1>brand new, happy, healthy cells out of the old cells.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's great. It keeps your tissues refreshed. But when

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>body cells cease their self replication, they stop making brand new,

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>spanking new, happy, fresh little cells. This is known as senescence.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>It's also known as cells sort of going into retire ironment. Yeah,

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and that process leads into cell death. But why on

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>earth would our bodies be coded to kill off cells.

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>That seems like the opposite of what a body would

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>want to do. Yeah. Uh, it is helpful in some situations,

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when cells are too damage to continue functioning correctly,

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and so that that's the body's way of telling them

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>to just just go out and quit. You've done enough,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>You're fine. Um or in the case of sing like cancer,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really good to be able to just just be like,

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we don't really need you any here

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>here anymore. We're doing okay. And certainly, if you didn't

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have senescence, if you didn't have this process, uh, if

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>there was this unchecked method of cellular division, it could

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>lead to things like cancer. However, if you have senescence

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>body wide, then you're essentially saying that the cells have

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>stopped dividing and now it's borrowed time because cells have lifespans. Yeah.

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you think about it from the

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>genetic perspective of your cells, you can see why this

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>might be the case, because what is the purpose of

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>your body Genetically speaking, It's not to be happy and

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>healthy forever. It's to survive long enough to achieve prodigious

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>sexual recombination. And uh and so, I mean, once you're

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>beyond the age of sexual reproduction, what of what uses

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it to your genes to just keep making your muscles strong? Yeah,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we're really just biting our thumbs at our genes every

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>day that we live without having healthy children. Yeah, yeah,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm alright with that. Okay, so so, so, why why

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>does senescence happen? Researchers think that on a cellular level,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it happens because of this stuff called telomeres. Telomeres our

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>our DNA caps on the end of your chromosomes that

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>protect your DNA from wear and tear when cells divide.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Geneticist Elizabeth Blackburn famously compare them to the little plastic

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>caps on the end of shoelaces. Oh, I've heard Michia

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Cake you say the same thing. But I bet he

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>got it from her. I I think I think she

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was the originator of that phrase. Now I'm terrified that

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong. No, I bet, I bet, I bet that's

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the case. Okay, Uh, so, so you're you're you're telomeres

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>unlike well, well, actually exactly like the plastic caps on

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of your shoeleases are also subject to the

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>same wear and tear that happens to the DNA when

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>your cells are dividing, so they get shorter after many

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>cell divisions, and when they wear down enough, the cells

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're in stop dividing, and that is in essence,

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So when that happens to adult stem cells, that might

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>be one of the critical factors of aging, because adult

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>stem cells are the things that create new cells when

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you're when your tissues are damaged or or your your

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>blood needs to be replaced, and they're usually just hanging

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>out in a state of quiescence, a sort of like

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like yellow alert. Okay, so they're not actively creating new cells,

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and they don't themselves divide to create new stem cells

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>unless some kind of damage happens. And there have been

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>some studies that have shown that with age, or or

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>possibly once having gone enough cell divisions, adult stem cells

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>don't function as quickly or as completely as they used to,

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>so your body is less able to replace and repair

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>damage that gets done. And of course, when one thing

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>gets damaged in one of our bodily systems, it reduces

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the function of other things, or you know, like weakens

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the structures needed to prevent further damage, like in osteoporosis. Right, Okay,

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. However, there is a process of your

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>cells that protects your telomeres, an enzyme called telomerase to telomerasemerase, telomerase, interesting,

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>telomerase like telemachus. I like that you look at obviously,

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I want to cobb Well anyway, not kebabs.

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But telomerase or telomerase controls the generation and the formation

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and the length of your telomere, but not all of

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>your cells make it, which is actually a good thing

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because cancer. But more more on that later on. Didn't

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that funny that cancer link just keeps coming up in

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this episode? Well, it's gonna come up a lot in general,

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not just in this episode, but in the following one.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Because one of the things when you're talking about trying

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to counteract or even reverse aging,

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the big questions that comes up in everyone's

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>mind is you're talking about regenerating tissue that is frighteningly

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>close to the concept of uncontrolled cellular division, which is

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>what cancer is made of. Exactly. Yeah, undifferentiated, uncontrolled growth.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so that that's an interesting avenue of research

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about what causes aging. But we've also got the issue

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of mitochondria, right, oh yeah, okay, so so our selves

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>mitochondria definitely become less efficient as we age. UM and

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and my mitochondria if you guys don't remember, from like

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>seventh grade biology or possibly from a wind in the door?

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Was that which which one did you guys ever met? Yeah? Yeah, yeah,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>she totally talked about mitochondria and one of those books

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>at any rate. Um. But what mitochondria actually are are

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the organelles inside of ourselves that, among other things, chemically

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>convert the nutrients that we take in into the molecules

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that our cells eat to gain the energy they need

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to do what they do. Yeah. I think the common

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>way of expressing it is that they're the power plants

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of our selves exactly. Yeah. Yeah. They produce what is it,

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>t um and so when mitochondria become less efficient, they

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>produce less a tp Our cells can't do as much,

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and therefore our body's entire metabolic activity systems slows down.

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>We have, you know, less nutrient transfer, fewer new cells,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>decreased immune response all that good stuff that goes into

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a young and healthy body. But of course all that,

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>all that that and more tends to add up to

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>these macroscopic effects that we see on the body as

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a whole. Oh sure, yeah, and we see plenty of those.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right. So, for example, some of these macroscopic effects

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see, one of the most general ones tends

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a decrease in tissue elasticity. And this is

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty much body wide, but really we're talking

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>about muscles and blood vessels in particular. Yeah. Yeah, it's

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the the collagen inside the little tiny molecules of proteins

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that are folded up. Stop being as cool. Yeah, it's

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like if you you know, you got that that

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>one pair of underwear you really should be tossing out.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It just in't doing the job anymore. It's that elastic

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is all totally worn out. It's kind of sad when

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that that pair of underwear is actually representing something like,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, your heart. That's a bad thing. Yeah,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but if only science could replace it with a pair

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of means right. Bones also also come weaker. You lose

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bone mass faster than you are regenerating it, uh, and

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that can lead to osteoporosis, which is the more extreme

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>version of that problem. You know, one thing I've heard

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.239
<v Speaker 1>expressed by some of the advocates of aging reversal technology

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is to think about it this way. Aging is the

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>number one risk factor for almost every disease we know of.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite everyone, but the vast majority of them.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about it like that, it kind

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of might tweak your understanding of whether or not we

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>should do something about aging. Because if you had, say,

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>if you said cigarette smoking was the number one risk

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>factor for the majority of known diseases and conditions, I mean,

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you'd really want to do something to

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>get people to stop smoking. It's it's like, well, obviously,

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>don't smoke. That's terrific. So clearly you should stop aging.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Just don't do it. Don't age, kids, don't age. My

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>life's been doing that for years. She celebrates her twenty

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>nine birthday every year. Oh that old joke, And you

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>make that joke every year, don't you might? Okay, So,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>so one idea to keep in mind going forward, we

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to talk about some some new ideas and

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what to do about aging and in ways to counteract it.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>But one idea to keep in mind is also the

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>difference between the concepts of life span and health span um.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And so this is something that I think is recently

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>something that doctors have started to talk about more. Lifespan,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>of course, is just time from birth until death. How

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>many years do you Yeah, But health span is time

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>until serious illness. And a lot of medical technology over

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the you know, past decades, has succeeded in extending the

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>former without necessarily extending the ladder. So, in other words,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>life expectancy has increased, but but how long you remain

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>healthy within that lifespan hasn't measurably increased at the same rate,

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>or I should say, just increased at the same rate.

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It has certainly increased, there's no denying that, but it

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>has an increased to the point where you would say, um,

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if the average life expectancy has gone up three years,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the health span has not done that. Yeah, And so

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a thing that's important to keep in mind when

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about rejuvenation research. A lot of it is

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>focused on extending quality of life and not just extending life,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe not even extending lifespan at all. Maybe that

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know that that could happen, But perhaps the focus

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for at least some of the researchers is not let's

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>see if we can get people to live to a

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty on a regular basis. It's let's see

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>if we can make sure people maintain a good quality

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of life, a good healthy life, or more of their lifespan.

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about it this way. Would you rather

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>live to two hundred but for the second two hundred

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>years you can't get out of bed? Or would you

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>rather live to e ight but be healthy and fit

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole time can't or whoa, there's a lot of

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>comic books in the universe, Like I could spend a

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>solid decade or two just reading comics, and that's not

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>even getting into nonfiction. But eventually you'd want to get

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>out of bed, go line up to see the movie

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to disappoint you. That's what digital downloads are for,

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all right. So let's talk about some of the research. Yeah, well, okay,

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So there are some avenues of research into rejuvenation or

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>aging reversal that we have talked about in recent podcasts.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>One of them, for example, is if you remember our

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>episode about the Future of blood, we talked about research

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>into the rejuvenating effects of young blood. Now really, honestly

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that research has goes back centuries. Elizabeth. You have to

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>believe the the sensational reports of Elizabeth Bathory. Yes, but no,

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is very interesting though it's yet another one

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of these things where we should always couch all coverage

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of aging reversal research with it. Let's not get carried

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>away here, um that you know, there is there is

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>some interesting research coming out and we want to keep

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>an eye on it. But nobody's found the fountain of

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>youth yet. But yeah, yeah, can we just never use

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that phrase again as a as a human species. I'm

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>right there with you, Lauren. Okay, so, but but a

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>quick refresher on the blood thing if you if you

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>wanna full breakdown of this, you can go back and

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>check out our episode on the Future of blood. But

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in short, multiple lines of research have shown that giving

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>older animals infusions of blood from younger animals of the

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>same species has rejuvenating effects on body tissues. And some

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of the experiments have been in what's called heterochronic parabiases,

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>where you sew together to mice one young and one old,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so that they share a circulatory system and a common

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>pool of blood. That, yeah, that does sound creepy, but

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the results, it's an extreme measure, like I'm not going

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to sign up for that tomorrow, but the results. But

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the results have shown that the old mice have improved

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>muscular and cognitive function and the they have younger looking

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>tissues at a cellular level when continually exposed to the

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>blood of young mice in this way. On the other hand,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the young mice do not seem too fair as well

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>from this procedure. Uh there there seems to be a

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of compensating not so great effect for them. But

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>in some studies in rodents, they think they've isolated a

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>protein called g DF eleven for growth differentiation factor eleven,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as a major contributor to the rejuvenation effects. Though since

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on this we did, I think I've read

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of articles questioning the primacy of g DF

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven as as the factor affecting this rejuvenation. Uh So,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>as you can tell from that, the research is still ongoing,

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>and it would be premature to say that the blood

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the young is this fountain of youth or whatever.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We should have an alternative phrase, the hose of infancy.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>So health recommend nuts the spigot of infancy, spat of

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>spigot of infancy, come on adolescence. I'm not sure if

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>infancy is where I want to go back to. No,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we will Benjamin Button all the way. I haven't seen

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that movie, so I don't know what that means better

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>than my suggestion of prepubiscent dip. Wow. Okay, yes it

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>is the spigot of health. Yeah. No, it is not

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily been shown to be this A Researchers are usually

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>quick to point out that the technique hasn't been shown

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to make animals immortal or even necessarily increase the lifespan.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>But what research we have seen is interesting, particularly with

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>reference to potential treatment for specific diseases like Alzheimer's, where

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to see uh targeted rejuvenation of

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>cells that have seen some kind of deterioration due to

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>an age related disease. And so it could be that

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with some of these things we talked about today, they

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>might not make you younger or make you live longer,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>but they might turn out to help with some particular

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>disease which may or may not be age related. It

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes into something that we say on the

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>show all the time, which is that, uh, scientific experimentation

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and exploration can lead to answers to questions that we

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>weren't even specifically looking at at the time, and it

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>requires very rigorous follow up to make certain that those

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>answers are in fact valid. But it is well, yeah, no,

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm sorry, I'm loving I I It just occurred

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to me that like that basically, like we are constantly

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just going like, well the answer is forty two. Well,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think like if you if you were to

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>do an experiment and you get an unexpected outcome, then

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously you need to uh re examine that and see

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's replicable and then get down to the question

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of what is it that's actually happening. Yeah. But another

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that this springs up is we sort of mentioned

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this earlier, but just to highlight it again, there are

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple different goals they're sort of encompassed by by rejuvenation research.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>One of them would be increasing lifespan. Another would be

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>making old body tissues look like young body tissues and

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>work as well as them. Yeah, like like a good

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, a good pair of kidneys or a

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>good heart, all of that kind of stuff that does

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>tend to decrease its efficiency over time. Yeah, and another

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>thing would just be, uh doing this in a way

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that leads to a good quality of life. For example,

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we already know of one thing in animals that leads

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to increased lifespans, you know this caloric restriction. If you

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are willing to starve yourself too nearly to death on

0:20:54.600 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a constant basis annual, probably live longer in a laboratory setting. Unfoly,

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the thing that happens along with this, uh, this boost

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in longevity is a complete shutdown of the immune system.

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're just wandering out around the world full

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of germs, then probably that's not going to fare very

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>well for you. Oh yeah, that's a good thing to

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>point out. But also it just sounds miserable. I mean,

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to live this way. No, I I

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't. Food is probably the most important thing to me. Um.

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>This research, by the way, was from It was just

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>published in March sixteen and it came out of the

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Leibnitz Institute on Aging out of Germany. And yeah, so

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>uh so, so don't so don't totally restrict your calories

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>down to nothing in the hopes of getting better longevity.

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.239
<v Speaker 1>It probably won't work. Well, maybe you should if you

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>can live that way and want to live in the

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>bubble boy suit and no, yeah, I mean it's very fetching, right, Yeah,

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>this is is it living? If you can't snuggle with

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a dog on your face? It's interesting to me because

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that Clorican, the cloric intake research, that stuff that's been

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going on since like the nineteen thirties. Yeah, so this

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>is uh, you know, it goes to show like that

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>research began in the nineteen thirties, we're still looking into

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the effects today. That to me is a big indicator

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of how challenging it is. This this idea of how

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do we rejuvenate, how do we combat aging? It's not

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's a new question. It is something that has

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>been going on for a while. So that's an interesting,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>uh note. I think I agree with you. But then again,

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there are also new technologies and techniques and bits of

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that are coming out that could be very well

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>accelerating our our knowledge on how to combat aging. One

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, I think is this interesting idea of the

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>clearing out of sinescence cells as one possible way to

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>reverse the effects of aging. So I was reading about this.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>There was a study published in Nature in by Mayo

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>clinic researchers Darren Baker and Jan Van Deerson, and it

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>was the latest to suggest that if you clear out

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>sinescence cells from the body. Remember these are the cells

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>who were talking about earlier. That are the retired cells.

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>They're they're done dividing and making new happy cells. You

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if you clear those out of the body, you can

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>rejuvenate tissue and perhaps live longer. So Baker and vin

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Jerson found that if you're able to remove sinescence cells

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>from the bodies of mice, those mice live about twenty

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>longer on average. So we mentioned these sinescence cells earlier.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But what do they do once they sit around in

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the body so they retire. It turns out they have

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>some not so friendly side effects. There might be beneficial

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>effects to um. We can talk about those if you want,

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>but they're believed to mostly just hang out and excrete

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>molecules that harm other tissues and processes in the body.

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Basically molecules that lead to greater inflammation and greater rates

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of oxidation. Oxidation is rust It's not something you want

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>inside your body. No, No, you don't want your inter

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>cellular structures rusting. Nobody nobody wants that, or or or

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>having happened to them. What happens to avocado dip left

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 1>out too long as guaco? I think, I think I

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>want that less than I want rusting. However, I do

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>want guacamole, I don't. I always want glucomole um and research.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Some researchers think at any rate that aging mitochondria have

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>something to do with those molecules that are being released,

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>tying it back to the mitochondria issue. Um there was

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a study published in the E m b

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>O or possibly MBO journal um in uh just recently

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in but but so so back back to these mice though. Yeah,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Actually I've read a good article about this research, the

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Clearing of senescence Cells that ed Young Road for the

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic in February, where he describes looking at two mice

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>side by side, and one of them looks like a

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>healthy adult mouse and the other one has quote graying

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for a hunched back and an eye that's been whitened

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>by cataracts. So it sounds like it's seen better days.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And yet these two mice are the same age. In fact,

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not just the same age, they're twins, genetic twins. Yeah,

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>same age, same genes. It's one of them, an actor

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>mouse that's portraying like the hunchback of Notre Dame. No

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>it is it does not have Tom Savini mouse makeup

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>on the mouse version of King Lear. Oh no, no, no, no,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's too Oh that would be so cute. Okay, please

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Well, anyway, it's just that one of them,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the healthy looking one, has undergone this procedure to clear

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>out the retired senescence cells from its body. So to

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>back up a little bit. In two thousand eleven, Baker

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and Van Jersen were part of a team that came

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>up with this process for removing senescence cells from the body.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So they genetically engineered the strain of mice that display

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>aid congenital accelerated aging. These mice. You don't want to

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>be one of these mice. They got old very fast. Uh,

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and also with a trait that would allow the researchers

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to administer a particular drug in order to induce the

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>systemic destruction of all the retired cells from the body,

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and they found that when the mice received this drug,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they became fitter, stronger, bigger, and healthier, and yet they

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>still died early. Remember these were the rapid aging mice.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>But a more recent bit of research is that Baker

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and Van Deerson found that you could do the same

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>thing with mice that were not genetically faded to rapid aging.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You could do it to the regular old lab mice,

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and they found that if you use the same procedure

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to clear the senescent cells from middle aged mice twice

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a week, the mice also showed healthier tissue, less body fat,

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>and just seemed fitter in general. Not only that, but

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, they lived longer, longer on averager

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and average of I can't imagine how depressing that must

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>be to be the elderly twin looking at the younger

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>twin and just thinking that could have been me. Well,

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it comes back to my proposal for NASA to

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>do the twin study again. That's what the Earth twin

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>would say to to his or her returning astronaut twin.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure that what the mice we're actually

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking was like squeak yeah, So let's let's talk beyond

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this experiment. What about Could this be something that's applicable

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to human beings not just to mice. Well we don't

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>know yet, but that's the thing that obviously people want

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to find out. So researchers think that drugs could be

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>developed to recognize the bio markers of sinescence cells, you know,

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the little flag that says I'm a retired cell in

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>humans and selectively destroy those cells. So just to go

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in your body, only find the retired cells, not hurt

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the good cells the you want and get rid of them.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But as usual, there a few things we need to say.

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>One of them is don't get carried away here. We

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>we need to see this reproduced in other studies. And

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>even then what works for mice and lab conditions won't

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean humans can undergo the same procedure and regularly

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>live to a hundred. But even if it's not useful

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in increasing general human lifespan, it might be useful in

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>treating age correlated diseases like arthritis, heart disease in glucoma.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Another drawback is already obvious from their research mice that

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>had their sinescence cells cleared on a regular basis also

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>displayed lower rates of healing from wounds, which is interesting

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>going back to that immune system depression. Yeah, so it

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>appears that the removal of these cells doesn't come without

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a cost. They they're sitting there having maybe a net

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>negative effect on the body, but they also appear to

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>do some things that are useful, and removing them counteracts

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>those positive effects. Uh. And then another potential risk of course,

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>yet again cancer. It just keeps coming up with rejuvenation technologies.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Like we mentioned earlier, cancer is the uncontrolled, undifferentiated cell

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>growth that we see. Any therapy that seems to unnaturally

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>extend or accelerate cell growth seems at least in potential

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a cancer concern. One last thing from Young's article that

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought was really interesting is that he got a

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>quote from Dr Norman Sharpless of the UNC Chapel Hills

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>School of Medicine, who said the following quote, you take

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a drug reserve at all green tea, god knows what,

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And he's naming there a few of the things that

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have been called up in the research as potential anti

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>aging drugs throughout the years. But he continues, you take

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that drug for thirty years and by the time you're eighty,

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you're actually seventy. That paradigm doesn't work in the real world.

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think I agree with him there. I mean,

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to take a drug their whole lives

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to see maybe some reduce staging over a long period

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of time. Right. Uh, he continues, people hate taking drugs,

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>especially when they don't know it's helping them. And no

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>farmer company would develop such a drug. If this paper

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is right, and he's talking about the Baker and Vandersen paper,

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>suddenly you have a way of taking an old organism

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and making it physiologically younger. You go from a prevention

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>paradigm to a treatment one that's something you can sink

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>your teeth into. And I think he's got a good

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>point there. I mean it it reacts to not just

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what a drug can do, but the different ways that

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to interact with medical technologies. It specifically speaks

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to a very American approach to medicine, this idea of

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>treating a disease as opposed to trying to prevent one, right.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we would be better off probably

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>if we did the prevention more than the treatment. I mean,

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, when you really get down to it,

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a great way to prevent aging is to hide eight

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and eat vegetables and exercise. Sometimes I think I think

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if you, I think, if you look at it in

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the sense of, if you take this drug, you're still

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get old. It might take a little longer

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for you to feel like you're getting old than it

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise, But that's your personal experience. You wouldn't know otherwise, right,

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, your reality is whatever it is that you

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>are doing. So and we've talked about that that bias

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on on the show before too, that the whole, the whole, like, well,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it didn't not work. I'm still here, right, But but

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.479
<v Speaker 1>something where you take a drug and you feel younger,

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>then you have something to compare the effects to you,

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I already know what being older than this feels like.

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's definitely one of those things where you can

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>understand where someone's coming from if that seems more appealing

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to them, even if you were to demonstrate Yeah, but

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>if you do this other approach, you're going to feel

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>better for longer and you don't ever have to dial back.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Right then, again, I would say that there is a

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>quite obvious appeal to the reversal process for people who

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are already today in their sixties or seventies. There's appeal

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to me right now, and I'm in my forties. I

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>guess to all of us, except those babies out there

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>who are still in their prime. Huh, all right, Jonathan

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>moans with hate. Look, I don't I don't hate young people.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to him a lawn. He just

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>wants the spigot of health all to himself. I'm not

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>going to deny your accusation. I'm just not going to

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge it. Okay. But but that avenue of research we

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just talked about is based on one type of approach

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to the aging problem. If you are looking at aging

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>as an engineering problem and you want to fix it

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>or reverse it, there are several approaches you could take.

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And this this is sort of the error corre acting problems, saying, oh,

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we've got we've got a build up of stuff we

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want in the body, or of errors or of damage,

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and we can go in and fix that somehow. But

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there is an entirely different way to look at it.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Instead of saying going in and doing repairs, you could

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>look at it from a genetic point of view. So,

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in other words, the instructions within our genes, if you

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>could somehow rewrite those instructions so that the damage doesn't

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>even happen in the first place, yeah, Or so that

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the cells in your body, by their very nature, executing

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>their genetic instructions, will fix the problem themselves. And that's

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the genetic method. So one I one name that has

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>come up in this way of looking at the aging

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>problem is the geneticist George Church. So George Church runs

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a lab at Harvard Medical School, and he has made

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>some very interesting predictions about aging research that I read about.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Speaking to Joel Aichenbach of the Washington Post, Church has

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>said that new breakthroughs in genetics and gene editing will

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>make it possible to reverse aging and humans. And he

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>even predicts, quote, in just five or six years, he's

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to reverse the aging process in

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>human beings. And he seems to be speaking out of

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>personal experience based on the research that's going on in

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>his lab. This is obviously a really bold claim. But

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>five or six years, I mean, that sounds kind of crazy.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to point out Church is not

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just some whacko on the Internet. And he's not a

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>quack because he's a very well respected geneticist who has

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>been working in the field for years. He uh, I

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>know he. I think he was one of the founders

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Human Genome Project, or one of the organizers

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at least. So so what's so, what's he proposing? So

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about gene therapy. Basically, it sounds like his

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>experiments so far based on gene manipulation gene therapy not

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>just for curing specific diseases, but for reversing aging itself.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Whereas most research and rejuvenation is aimed at counteracting the

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>effects of aging, these would be doing what we were

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>just talking about, addressing the genetic root causes of aging

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in cells. So Church claims that he's already demonstrated aging

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>reversal on smaller animals in the lab, and the next

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>step is translating these results to larger animals and human trials.

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I found some good quotes from an article in the

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 1>San Diego Union Tribune covering his Future of Genomic Medicine

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>conference speech in sixteen, where Church said a few things

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that seemed very interesting to me. One of them is

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>quote if we could take one of my skin cells

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and turn it into an embryo like cell and turn

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it back into a skin cell, it is reset almost

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>all of the developmental indications of age. We have sixty

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>five gene therapies that are being tested in mice and

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.240
<v Speaker 1>larger animals. If they go well, we will go straight

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>into human trials that could be as little as two years.

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>He said this in essentially the I T crowd approach

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of turning it off and on again. It is control

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>all delete on your cells and it refreshes it. Yeah.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And and so he talks very interestingly. I like his

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking here about why he uses the term reversal for

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>aging instead of curing aging or stalling aging. Uh. He says,

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's about stalling or curing. It's about reversing.

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Curing gives you the impression of immortality, which is not

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily what is being proposed. Uh. Stalling gives you the

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>impression that you'll be eighty five forever, which is not great.

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>And we sort of mentioned that earlier in the show. Uh.

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 1>And So the last thing he says that I think

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is interesting is he says, quote, reversal is something that's

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>been demonstrated in a number of different animals in a

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>number of different ways. I think that's going to translate

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>into larger animals and humans. We won't know until we try,

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But we're trying sixty five different genes in different combinations

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>to see if we can reproduce the aging reversal that

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in small animals. We don't know what age

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>reversal would mean in terms of human years. Animals have

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>had their life extended by factors to to ten. That

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>seems to be too good to be true for humans. Yeah,

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, you know, living to sixty might be

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit much. Yeah, unless you're an evil wizard so

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>many comic books. Uh huh. So, despite the fact, I

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>did want to point out that he's not just some

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>whacko on the internet. This is a respected scientist. But

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you can't just take it on

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>one scientists authority that like, oh, yeah, he's got it. Yeah,

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>so he go home. Now, obviously he has a very

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>optimistic prediction, but it is interesting to hear this. Yeah,

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's there. Obviously, there are a lot of

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>questions to ask to like, would this approach also stave

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>off the age related diseases, that we're that we've talked

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about some things, or would it just be like like

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred years of Alzheimer's Right, it seems to be

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's got the idea of the health span in mind,

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's talking about not just forestalling death, but being

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>able to rejuvenate the tissues. Yeah. Yeah, I think a

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of um, and we'll talk more about this in

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the second episode, but I think a lot of of

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>experts in the field of aging are skeptical or or

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to endorse such a bold claim. I mean on

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the face of it, because, as we said at the

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>top of the episode, it's such a complicated issue that

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it may very well be that something you did not

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>anticipate is still in a problem, like one of these

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>age related diseases. And it may be that you have

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>very healthy tissues overall, but that you're still prone to

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>these other issues. Yeah, but you know your your immune

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>system craps out or you have cancer and wind up

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>looking like the character from the end of Akira and

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's all bad. Um. But uh, why did I just

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>make myself think about that? So I hope this guy's right.

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But but if he's not. It wouldn't be the first

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>time we've heard a scientist, even a very respected sign scientists,

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe speak with some overconfidence about how their their findings

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to be applied. Sure well, and and it's

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>especially um, I've done more research into the into the

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>cellular half of the argument, and or the fix it

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>half of the argument, or that not fix it genetically

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>half of the argument. It all kind of blurs together.

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, and and especially the kind of timetable

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that seems like that side of the science is on

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is very much longer term than the genetic side, and

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other stuff that I've read about the

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>genetics seems like it's very much longer term than that.

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And um, and most of the research in fact that

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I've that I've read is still so much in the

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>exploratory phase. They're they're still really looking into those specific

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>intracellular processes and lifestyle choices that cause aging. Right. Well,

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I should say is that some

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of these comments Church made seemed to be in the

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>context of talking about what has been made possible through

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the Crisper gene editing across us, which, of course, as

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about on the show before. Didn't didn't. Uh,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like we just recently invented how to edit genes.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We've been able to edit jeans for a long time.

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It just suddenly got way easier and way cheaper. Our

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>toolboxes massively expanded and downgraded in terms of cost. And

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>so you can always look at the possibility of new

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>techniques for research emerging that could rapidly accelerate the progress

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of research absolutely. Um one one thing that I that

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention when one study that I ran

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>across that looked promising to me in the long one

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in the long run, was was research into um the

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>rate at which different bodily proteins oxidized and and this

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a slow burn. But follow along

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with me. So we're back to the rust slash guacamole

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>e exactly. Yeah, yeah, yeah, we're back to resting in

0:40:54.719 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>guacamole um. So, so, proteins within our cells are damaged

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>by oxidation at different rates, and oxidation occurs at an

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>increased rate in older cells. So a team out of

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Stony Brick University published findings about about what types of

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>proteins are are affected by oxidation the most. Uh. They

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 1>looked at a whole bunch of them, they crunched all

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the data, and they they published an article in the

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>journal Structure in February of and what they found was

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that some of the proteins, like like twenty of the

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>proteins that are already associated with aging are the most

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>likely to be affected by oxidation. UM. They're they're short,

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>highly charged molecule chains, and they unfold relatively quickly when

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 1>exposed to that type of damage and UM as as

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about a bit in the Crisper episode and

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit in other genetic episodes genetic related episodes. UH,

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the folding of proteins is this very kind of mysterious

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that science is sort of just working out and

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>has very much to do with how those proteins function.

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>UM and specifically, UH telomerase is one of the proteins

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that is the most affected by oxidation. UM. Others include

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>proteins with known links to memory loss and cancer. So

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this type of research, you know, like like right now

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 1>they're just going like we found this cool thing, check

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>it out. Yeah, and that, But the the important part

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>is that this is another example of one more kind

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of chip away at the mystery of what aging is,

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of of people in the medical field

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.760
<v Speaker 1>argue that that deeper understanding is really what we require

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if we are to have any hope of actually combating

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 1>or reversing aging in the first place. Absolutely, and uh

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think that that brings us to

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 1>our to our kind of a breakpoint on this topic,

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>because because now we are entering the realm of of

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>what kind of what kind of products are out there,

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 1>what kind of people are talking about, different philosophies of

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>how you you can get better by maybe spending some

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>money on some things. Right, there's, um, there's a whole

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>world of scientists yelling at each other and shaking fists

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and throwing shoes about this very very topic. And we're

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>going to cover that in our next episode because I

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very interesting way of looking at how

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>even in the scientific community you can have very deep

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>disagreements bordering sometimes on outright fighting about the subject. And

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and what does that mean? And could it be possible

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that you've got one side that's following a very scientific

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>approach and one side that perhaps is being pseudo scientific,

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>or is that an unfair accusation. Is it truly just

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a hatfield and McCoy is kind of things? Is it

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 1>just misunderstandings all around? Right? Could it be that that

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>scientists who have hitched their their trailer over to one

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 1>particular vehicle saying this is the way I believe that

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>aging UH operates in and this is how we're going

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to have to address it. Is it just that they

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have a fundamental disagreement with another camp and that's what's

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>led to these these issues. That's what we're going to

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>explore in our next episode. So guys, if you have

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future episodes, whether it's a two parter like

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing this week or something totally different, you

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 1>should let us know. Get in touch with us. Our

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>email address is f W Thinking at how stup works

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or you can drop us a line on

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or Facebook. Our Twitter handle is f W Thinking,

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or drop us a line on Facebook. The the you know,

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>just search fw Thinking in the little search field will

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:51.439
<v Speaker 1>pop right up. You can leave us a message there

0:44:51.880 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and we will talk to you again really soon. For

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>more on this topic and the future of technology, visit

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking dot Com Problems Brought to you by Toyota.

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go places