WEBVTT - P&L: Trump Has an Uphill Climb to 270 Electoral Votes

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pim L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg pi L podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. All right, let's solve

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the issues related to investing in fixed income

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>with Jim Bianco. He is the president and the founder

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of Bianco Research, and he joins us now, Jim, great

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. As always, I wonder if

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you could just comment on an interview that Bloomberg's Eric

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Schatzka just did with the Ben Melkman Uh formerly of

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Brevan Howard is speaking about the the slope of the

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>yield curve and how he sees that that is going

0:00:55.160 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to increase. Uh. Great conviction, Great conviction. I beg your pardon,

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>great conviction that you're going to see this big slope

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we move higher in the yeeld curve. Yeah, not really.

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I I understand why you would think that if you

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that inflation was going to come back, and you'd

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>say and even if the FED was going to raise rates,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the long end of the Yelk curve would go up

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot faster. But I'm not fully into the inflation

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>camp just yet. I know that that's been the popular

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>idea for a lot of people, that inflation is going

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to return, and if not, and we see more weakness,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see the long end of the yeel

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>curve fallen yields relative to the front end of the

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Yelk curve. They're not gonna go down in the front end.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They might still go up at the FED races rates,

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and you might see still see the curve stay words

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>at right now, if not flatten a little bit more.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But it really comes down to what your view of

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation is. That it's it's not here yet. I understand

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that everybody's looking for it. I get the idea that

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>wages are percolating a little bit, but they have been

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for about eighteen months. Uh. I also see the idea

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, in the forward measures of inflation, like

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations are starting to move a little bit higher.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But I've seen this movie since two thousand nine, at

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>least four or five other times, and it always seems

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to peter her out because at the end of the day,

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you still have way too weak a growth I think

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to create the um the type of inflation demand pull

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that I think most people are looking for, because I

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't see that. I don't think we're going to get

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the inflation that everybody's hoping for. See, you had Morgan

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Stanley coming out earlier today and talking about how he

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>had they expect uh the ten your treasury yield to

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>go to two percent by your end. It's currently at

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>one point eight percent. What do you think where do

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you think it will end up? You know, two percent?

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a ceiling. Because I'm a lot more bullish

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>than people think I'm. My my view going into next

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>year is still going to be that inflation is not

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be there, the growth is gonna stay low.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>We still have the potential of a shock maybe in

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>financial markets that could push financial markets down, something similar

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to a Brexit. Maybe it's next week in the election,

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's in December with the Italian referendum, which

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think could be Blexit one point five that the

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Italian referendum is that big. So there's a lot of

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>things I see that could push rates lower. As opposed

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to pushing them higher. So yeah, we hit one yesterday.

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Two percent might be an absolute ceiling on the market,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that the next big moving rates

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>would be lower. All right, next big moving rates lower? Chimpianco.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about commodity prices. Are commodity prices at their

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>bottom or are we going to see a continued increase? Well,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the thing about commodities right now is you

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>almost have to separate them out, you know, Like my

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite line about them is carn copper, cocoa, crude oil, um,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and coffee. I'll start with the letter C. But they're

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not all necessarily commodities in a aggregate because they all

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>do very different things. The agricultural markets look very bullish

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. They could continue to move higher. The precious

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>metals are struggling. I still think that oil is topping

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>or the energy complex is topping as well too. And

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of going sideways with the industrial metals. So

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they're all over the lot. But if you wanted to

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>look at it in a big picture, there is no

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>strong breakout of the commodity indexes right now. They're probably

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>trending sideways to slightly lower and that strong breakout, which

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>would suggest world growth is coming. I don't think that

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>indicator is going to give it to us right now.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you're saying that you think there's the

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>next move in rates is going to be lower. Uh,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the consensus from well, it seems like

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the consensus is kind of splintering. What do you think

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the big consensus trade is right now? You know, that's

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a good question because it depends on who you talk to.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>If if you ask somebody who's got the title economist,

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>they've embarrassed on rates since about two thousand three, and

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't let a hundred and fifty months of

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>being wrong getting away. Their rates are still going to

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>keep going up. If you ask a grater, they're much

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>more bultless on the market right now, and portfolio managers

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit in the middle. I would still

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>argue to you, though, that the bigger surprise in the

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>marketplace would be a move down to one thirty on

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the tenure yield, which was the early July low and

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the all time low, as opposed to a move back

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to the January one high of to So I think

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that the surprise move given all of that would probably

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>be a revisit of the All Time Lows, which was

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>set just in early July. So we're gonna see this

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>movie for another like seven or eight, maybe nine more times.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Jim Bianco, thank you so much for coming and joining us.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Jim Bianco of Bianco Research in Chicago. I want to

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>learn more about Suicide Squad. I want to learn more

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>about Suicide Squad from Paul Sweeney, the director of North

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>American Research and Media UH for Bloomberg Intelligence. Paul, did

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you see it? I did not, but fortunately a lot

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of other people did. And that was one of the

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>contributors to a pretty strong quarter from Time Warner this morning.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, their movie Studio did did did well as expected.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>The cable networks actually did a little bit better than expected,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and that those are the real cash flow drivers for

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the company. UH and HBO, the third leg of that stool.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>At that the company also had a pretty good quarter.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So the company beat expectations here in the quarter. They

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>were able to raise their guidance for the year a

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit in terms of profitability, so I'm sure they

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about it. I'm sure A T and

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>T does as well. Well. Yeah, so this is this

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is what surprises me. Right, Time Warner should feel good,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>A T and T should feel good. Both stocks down. Yeah,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the you know, it's interesting about this deal,

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the A T. T and Time Warner deal. The marketplace

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is very dubious about this deal getting approved. I mean,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a transaction that's not scheduled closing to the

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty seventeen. But even if you kind of

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>do the arbitrage math, that suggests that, I think the

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>market is dis kind of a less than fifty fifty

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>chance that this deal gets approved by by the regulators.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we're gonna have to see how

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>things play out with the election and then see how

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the things play out with the regulators. But a lot

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty around this deal. Hey, Paul, can we just

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>go through the three areas that Time Warner is on

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>involving because you mentioned the cable channels, right, the cable

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>broadcast monthly subscription fees higher, right, So it's you know,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the monthly subscription fees. Those those are the fees that

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the cable companies like Comcast and pay to the media

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>owners like Time Warner and by via com to carry

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the channels. Those have typically have been growing a revenue

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>stream for the media companies in the high single digit range. Uh.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Time Warner actually did a little bit better. Um, they

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>were able to renegotiate some of their contracts recently. That

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>took advantage that we're that priced in the NBA UH contract,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>which they were able to charge them higher fees because

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they're now carrying some NBA games. So UH, that was

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong driver for them. Advertising UH is still

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>relatively strong in the marketplace, and Time Warners cable networks

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are big beneficiary of that as well. Is is the

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>HBO now that stand alone streaming service they give any

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>indication or how that's performing, Uh, it's performing pretty well.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>There's there's north of one million new subscribers or stand

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>alone subscribers to HBO. Now, UM, you know, the real

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>question that I think investors have is are these new

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>subscribers to HBO or they cannabalizing some of their existing

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>subscribers that get it through a cable system. Time Warners

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that the vast majority of these are our new subscribers, UH,

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>younger demos, people that were not subscribing to HBO in

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the future. But that's clearly I think where the industry

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is going, which is to make your programming available not

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>just on the traditional cable systems, but also direct to consumers,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>very similar to help people get their Netflix. So at

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, we're going to know everything

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that we need to know about media, the current state

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of media in the world. We're gonna get some earnings

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>from twenty first century Fox as well as Facebook. So

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>when you wake up tomorrow morning, what's the narrative going

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to be. Well, the narrative is going to be that

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the traditional media companies like twenty one century Fox are

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in pretty good shape, but the real growth, the real

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>ad dollars are shifting continuing to shift to the media

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>to the online media companies like Facebook. So Facebook is

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>going to put up a revenue growth north of fifty

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>percent um, and you compare that to some of the

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>high single digit revenue we've seen from the traditional media

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>companies and just shows you the way of the world.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say, take a look at the annual

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth of Facebook. We're going I know we're going

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to get quarterly after the close of trading, but you're

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>talking going from five billion to seven point eight billion

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to twelve to seventeen. The estimate now twenty two billion,

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is in four years. A company goes from

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>five billion to twenty two billion. Yeah, it's just amazing.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about online uh, you know, internet advertising,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>two companies take more than fifty of it, and that

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>is Facebook and Google. If you're a big brand advertiser

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like a Ford Motor Company or a Coca Cola and

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to advertise digitally, only two places you can

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>really spend your money, and that's Google and Facebook. And

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they also integrate the advertising and marketing. They actually have

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>employees from both companies. The advertisers plus Facebook and Google

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>actually get together on a regular basis, uh, to make

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of decisions. Yeah, it's it's it's really been

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>been amazing kind of what what they're doing, and it's

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of frozen out a lot of the other players.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So you see like a Twitter sitting there with three

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and twenty million uh subscribers are users onto their platform.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They are really finding it hard to really get the

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>attention at Madison Avenue and a big advertisers, so it's

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>really become a dual woppily from the perspective of uh,

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big online advertisers. So you know that's

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things A T and T says, A

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>T and T says, we are going to create a

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>big advertising alternative to the Google and facebooks of the world. Well,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>as Lisa just mentioned, shares of A T and T

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there down about a quarter of a percent today. Thank

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining us. Paul Sweeney, head of Research,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Director of Research for Bloomberg Intelligence. Well, he's a human

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's been tracking human feelings about the election. Mark

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Niquette is our politics and national government reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>He can be followed on Twitter at m Niquette. All right, Mark,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we got a pole and then there's something from President

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Obama having to do with the FBI. Let's start with

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the independent of the Poll of Independence by Bloomberg Politics.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>What what does it show. It's actually a bit of

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>good news for Hillary Clinton after several days here of

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>bad news related to the release of the FBI letter

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>showing there is more scrutiny on emails. The Poll of

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Independence folks who say they haven't decided yet showed her

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>with a slight advantage over Donald Trump. About that's important

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>because this is a group of swing voters that can

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>often decide an election in particularly in key battleground states.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>And it's a group that Republican met Romney won by

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>five percentage points in twelve. So it shows that Donald

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump is still having some trouble sort of building the

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>coalition of of Republicans and independence that you know helped

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Romney and twelve and even then he lost. So it

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>shows he still has some work to do to get

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>these folks to build a coalition that wins. It seems like,

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just based on market action, that a lot of traders

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly think that Trump is that Mr Trump is is

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>positioning in a better position right now to become our

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>next president than Secretary Clinton. And you know, from the

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>people you speak with, the analysts, do you do, they

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>seem to suggest that Trump has seriously improved his odds

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of becoming president in the past couple of days. Now

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>there are signs and suggestions that you know, he has

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>better position today than he was a last week. I mean,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly before the news that fb FBI letter broke, you know,

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the sense was we were headed towards a pretty solid

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Clinton victory and that the race has tightened now significantly now,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, we always expected the race to get closer

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>as Republican voters sort of came home in the final

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>days before the election. Um, but the FBI revelation seemed

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to have sort of shifted the thinking and feeling about

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>this race. I mean, it's still I think gonna be

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>an uphill climb for Trump to get to electoral votes.

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his campaign has essentially laid out that he

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>needs to win Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Iowa and

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>then another battleground state to really have a good shot

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at two torn it to the in seventy electoral votes.

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So Clinton can stop him in any one of those states,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, she would still be the favorite, I think.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as it has been through this entire election,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>people are weary now of making predictions, and it's been

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so unpredictable. You know, we're gonna have to see what

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>happens on election day for sure. Another big question are

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly among the people who I speak with, is will

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Congress back Donald Trump's proposals, Particularly is economic proposals, which

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>are rather expansive and don't really kind of cohere with

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>traditional uh sort of fiscal conservatism. Uh So you know,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>what's your sense, do you use your sense that that

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the House and Senate will back his proposals as is,

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>well a lot will be turned down. What the composition

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of Congress looks like after this election. I mean, we're

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>still waiting to see, you know what, who controls the Senate.

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a there's a chance at least for

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats to regain control there and with the mix

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of sort of very conservative members versus you know, more

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>moderate Republicans in the House will be assuming they continue

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>controlling that chamber. Um, And you're right, I mean, there's

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>there's Trump's proposals have kind of a mix of sort

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of more traditional Reaganesque kind of elements, like his tax

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>proposals I think would would have more broadest acceptance there.

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know there's other things that I think he

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>would have trouble getting through Congress. But you know, a

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of variables there to be determined before we can

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of guess on how you know, anything specific might

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>play out. Mark the President. President Barack Obama has said

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he was giving a interview and online he describes He

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>said that the FBI Director James Comby's decision to renew

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a probe of Hillary Clinton's emails had become a political controversy. Yeah,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no question about that. I mean, President

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama is in a tough position, and as much as

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this is his appointed right and he can't sort of

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be out there publicly, you know, sort of questioning him

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>or or undermining him. Um, but you know there's no

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>question that you know, having the FBI director, you know,

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>send this letter to Congress eleven days before election sort

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of raises the question of whether you know, the FBI

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is you know, interfering or at least you know, influencing

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>election by doing this so close to the voting, and

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether that was the intent or not. Sort

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the practical outlook impact of that could be that this

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ways you know, votes in the race, which is something

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the Justice Department and FBI you know,

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a rule that right to avoid you know,

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty fastidiously. I mean, this is basically like Obama saying

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we breathe there. I mean, of course, has become a

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>political controversy. I mean every poll has kind of showed

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's certainly being taken to some degree, uh like

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that whether or not it's justified or not is a

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>whole other question. It certainly has become a political story.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark going forward, what is the one thing that you're

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at today that you think that is sort of

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the underreported story. I think the underreported story, UM is

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with early vote among key elements of the

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Obama coalition. This is the sort of African Americans, young

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>voters in particular Latinos who supported Barack Obama and are

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they UM is going to go with with Hillary Clinton

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in the numbers that she needs to UM to win.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing a little bit of that insight with

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the early voting totals that are coming out suggest that

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>there might be less enthusiasm among African Americans, for example,

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>for Hillary Clinton and there was for Obama. And I

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think diving into those numbers and how that coalition votes

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>will a little long wait or to turning whether Hillary

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Clinton wins. Mark Niqette, thank you so much for being

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with us. Mark Niquette, politics and national government reporter for

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News breaking down all things related to this presidential election.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa Bramo. It's here with pim Fox. This is Bloomberg.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>The Shares of te connectivity. They are higher by about

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>one and a half percent. Many people may not know

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>about t E Connectivity. It has a former name, Tycho Electronics.

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And here to tell us more about t E Connectivity

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and its future is Tom Lynch. He is the chairman

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>of the Connectivity. He's also the outgoing chief executive. Also

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>with us is the president and the incoming chief executive,

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Curtain. Thank you, gentlemen for being here here. I

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say that must be some kind of special ceremony,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a secret password or something. But I'm wondering

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>if you could just describe Tom, what kind of company

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>are you? I know you're gonna remain chairman, but what

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of company do you feel you're handing over to

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Terrence to to take charge of a very good company.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>We have lots of opportunity to get better detailed. Give

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, but give us the d because I was

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>reading there's a lot of cool stuff you've been You

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>work with companies like Google and Facebook. People may not

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>know this. Tell us what what is t E Connectivity.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>T Connectivity is a twelve billion dollar global company with

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>seventy of our revenue outside the US, and we're right

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the connected world phenomena. So automotive, aircraft, machinery,

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>communications equipment, sent medic a lot of sensors, a lot

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of connectors, and a lot of connectors, uh twelve billion

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>plus of them. So we're in a great a great industry,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>say multiple industries. Everybody's our customers, we like to say, well,

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very competitive industry. So, Terrence, I wanted

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk with you a little bit about going forward. Yes,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the future as far as is everything under

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the sun being connected, but there is everyone also wanting

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to get in that from Google to Amazon to who

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>knows whoever h So what's the competitive landscape like and

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>how big do you think the business could grow when

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the business day, like Tom says,

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about twelve billion dollars, and when we look at the landscape,

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty diverse landscape. The customers that you mentioned

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>are more of our customers and competitors to Googles and

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook's. Our engineers were fortunate. We have over seven

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand engineers that actually enable some of the customers that

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>you talked about, as well as the automotive companies that

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom talked about. So what's great is how we're globally deployed,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think we get the benefit of the trends

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of the connected world as well as the various industries

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>we have so that can be automotive, medical. From a

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>competitive standpoint, it's many different type of competitors. There isn't

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>one single competitor we go up against. It really depends

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>upon the applications we play into, and that's one of

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the things that we think we excel at bringing that

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>engineering to our customers to really enable where they want

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to take the connected world. Terrence, I got to mention

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of projects this kind of give some flesh

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to all of this Pacific Light cable network. You have

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>just chosen, I believe to be a contractor there for

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a Facebook Google project. You've also got the

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>new Cross Pacific and Maria and I wonder if you

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>could just tell us about each of those and and

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>how that defines the company. Yeah, him, great questions are

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>projects we've had in our SubCom business, which is a

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit less than temporary to tell people's SubCom, SubCom, SUBM,

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>submarine communications, and really what we do in our SubCom

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>business is really build out the long haul oceanic systems

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for the world, and they actually support the cloud. So

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>anytime you think about a cloud application, really, where do

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you get to the data senators support? And that's where

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook's, the Google's, the Microsoft that are building the

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>cloud applications. We support them by building systems that they

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>actually own and use to make sure they can bring

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>their services down to their customers. And that's what's great

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about what t E does is we enable our customers

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring that great connected world tour. Tom, You've been

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the CEO since two thousand and six. The world has

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>changed a lot in the ten years. What's been the

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest change in your industry? Well, the trends have accelerated

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>for connectivity, that's the biggest thing. You know, it has

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>been a big shift. It's just been no it's it's

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>just it's acceleration. So maybe the best way to think

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>about it, I think of what a car was like

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago versus today. It's it's incredibly different inside, right,

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>you still have four tires and an engine, but the

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>connectivity throughout it, the safety systems throughout it. Every time,

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the UH you have to improve emissions, more

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and more technology going into the car. So that's the

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>great thing about this business. It's this acceleration of smarts

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>into virtually every aspect of the world, and it requires

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>more sensors and more connectivity. For us as a business,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the big changes. We weren't in the censor business ten

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Now we're one of the world's leading sensor suppliers.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>We weren't in the minimally invasive medical device business selling uh,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the subsystems into that. Now we're one of the biggest

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>players in that area. So for us, you know, we've

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>jumped on those big trends in the last five years.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Margins tell us a little bit about margins. Who wants

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to handle that? You want to take that? Go ahead.

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Our margins today are pre tax operating margins run north

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of six or after tax margins run about twelve. So

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a very healthy business. And the reason for that is is,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 1>as Terrence mentioned, in these harsh environments where of our

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>business is very hard to you know, to to get

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>these solutions and get them right. So if we design

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>something in that has to go onto the engine of

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a car, it's and that car is on the road

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years, it has to last for twenty years

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and all, you know, the in the environment, whether it's hot, cold, wet, dry,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So you get paid for that because your customers rely.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>We're very deep in the architecture of our customers and products,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and you get paid for that. So it's it's a

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>good business and it's a good cash flow business. Thank

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Uh Tom Lynch,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the outgoing CEO of t E Connectivity, and Terrence Curtain,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the incoming CEO of the company. Thank you so much

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.