WEBVTT - Best NFL Week 11 Bets + Favorite Props (Ep. 27)

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey to everyone.

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the Betting Pros NFL podcast, brought to

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>you by bet MGM. I'm your host, Dan Harris. You

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 2>can find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. It

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 2>is time to break down some of our favorite and

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 2>our least favorite bets for the Week eleven NFL Slate.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>With me to talk about it all is Andrew Kayley,

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>a senior publishing editor over at Covers. You can find

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>him on Twitter at Covers Underscore. Kaylee. That's c. A. L. E. Y, Andrew,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>How is it possibly week eleven already?

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Where are we?

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. It's week twelve in college too. We're

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>just a few weeks away from bowl games. It goes

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 3>so fast, it really does.

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I think about it with baseball, because you know, I

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of baseball as well.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Baseball's forever.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Man Like, by the time it's over, I'm so glad

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>it's over at this point, and with the NFL season,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 2>it's just like, where did it go?

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know.

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>It's other than the fact that I'm living now in

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the Arctic tundra. You know, I'm up in New England,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 2>so it's freezing. Other than that, I wouldn't even understand

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>that it's basically time to end the season.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, winter just hit too. I'm even more even northeast

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>than you up here in Atlanta, Canada, and winter hit

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the last two days and it did. It's cold playoffs

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>just a couple of weeks away.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>So well, let's distract ourselves with some gambling advice here.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 3>I like that.

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you guys know the drill.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 2>By now, Andrew and I are going to be giving

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 2>some of our favorite and our least favorite picks for

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>this week. But as always, let's start with a quick

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>review of last week. I hit on the over fifty

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>two and a half in the Bucks Cardinals game, and

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the under forty two and a half on the Bears

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>and the Lions. Now I narrowly missed by a mere

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty six points on the Bengals getting ten from the Ravens,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and for real, actually narrowly missed on my prop bet,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>which was Aaron Jones over one hundred yards rushing. He

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>had ninety three and only got thirteen carries. Meanwhile, our

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>guest Adam Burke nailed the heck out of that Falcons,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>getting thirteen from the Saints game. He basically had that

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.919
<v Speaker 2>game completely dead to rights from the time he started

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 2>analyzing it. He also hit on the Vikings getting three

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>from the Cowboys and Lamar Jackson over fifty nine and

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a half rushing yards. His only miss was on the

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Lions getting two and a half from the Bears, but

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to be fair, he had absolutely no reason to know

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 2>that Jef driscoll would be starting that game. So you

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>got some big shoes to fill here, Andrew, Are you ready.

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like it? I am ready, all right.

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 2>So we're gonna get started as always with pick six,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>where we're gonna give three each of our favorite bets,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 2>either against the spread or on the over under. And

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>again we're gonna be using the betting pros dot Com

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>consensus odds here that's an aggregate of the odds that

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 2>are available in the market. Go ahead and start us off.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I promise this is not me trolling you, but this

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 3>is I'm taking the Jets and now it's even moved

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 3>even further in my favorite at plus two and a half,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 3>which makes me feel a little uncomfortable, but I think

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 3>they're the better team still. I know, as a Jets

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>fan you probably hate to hear that, but just with

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 3>the way everything is going, and this all Adam Gase.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>He's back. Yeah, I saw how happy you were about that.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 3>But I think they can still win this game in

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 3>spite of Gase, particularly because of their defense. They rank

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 3>eleventh in the NFL in Football Outsiders DVA rankings and

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>second against the run. And Bill Callahan insists on continuing

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>to run the ball partly because Dwayne. He's committed to

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Dwayne Haskins being his quarterback and he doesn't really have

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 3>any other choice. But they're really not even that good

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>at running the football. They rank thirtieth and rushing offense Toboa,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and they've only scored twenty one points with Haskins as

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 3>their quarterback. That's over a three game span, I believe.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>And for your Jets, I still have faith in Sam Darnold.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>He showed some life last week and his completion percentage

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>has improved over the last three That offensive line is

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of terrible, but I think they still have the

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>weapons here, and like I said, in spite of Gays,

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 3>hopefully like they can get the ball to Crowder quickly

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>in some quick slants and hopefully get Leavey on Bells

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 3>more touches out of the backfield. I think you could

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 3>be effective in this game if they're passing the ball

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to them out of the backfield. He hasn't run the

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>ball very well recently, I know that, but that's I

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 3>think a product of that offensive line. But Washington is

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>just really terrible, and I think they're gonna win this.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I think they're gonna win the game out right, I

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 3>just do. So give me the two and a half points,

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 3>and I might even bet them on the money line

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>this weekend.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. All right, So, first of all, I don't think

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>you're trolling me.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I hope that you and I have a

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>good relationship outside of this podcast, so I would assume

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>that your integrity would allow you to kind of come

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>on here and make a real pick. But I'll be honest, No,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>it is. Yeah, I'll be honest. I do not in

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 2>any way hate this pick. It's not one of my favorites,

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>just because I'm so tired of backing the Jets like

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I did against the Patriots, like I did against the Jaguars,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>where they come out and do absolutely nothing. The fact

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that it's moved to two and a half is a

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>little surprising here, because everything I'm seeing shows that both

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the number of bets and the amount of money is

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 2>coming in on the Jets. So the fact that it's

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a reverse line move makes me a little worried. But

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 2>this is what I said when we looked at it

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>on Monday, right when we looked at Sean Green and

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I took a look at this line when it first opened,

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 2>it was one and a half, and I was surprised

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 2>by it because to me, it's a completely different story

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>with Dwayne Haskins starting at the time we looked at

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 2>it Monday, I think we had just found out about it,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>or perhaps we found out about it shortly after that game.

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 2>But Dwayne Haskins, at least to this point, has not

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>shown anything to suggest that he is remotely capable of

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 2>being an NFL quarterback at the moment. I'm not you know,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not giving an indict he's yeah, he's not ready yet.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>And I completely agree with the Redskins throwing him out

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>there for the rest of the season because what else,

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at this point, who cares?

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, Let's at least let him get his feet wet.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm try it, yeah, yeah, let's let him try it.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think with that, it's just really difficult to

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 2>see the Redskins putting up any sort of points, like

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>consistent points in this game. You know, I could see them,

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, popping off a touchdown once in a while.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Now they've had the bye week, so they may have

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>been able to work out some of the kinks with him.

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 2>But the bottom line is he's just not particularly accurate.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't been reading defenses all that well. So in

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the end, I'm fine with it, and I think I

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>would also. I would take it at two and a half.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I would take it at one and a half as well,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>and a bet on the money line I did as well. Yeah,

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a bet on the money line isn't isn't the worst

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>idea because frankly, I wouldn't be surprised to see the

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Jets win this game.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>The big thing with the Redskins is that, Frankly.

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I really do think it just feels like Bill Callahan's

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to run out the clock on the season by

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 2>running it NonStop legitimately, Yeah, like legitimately, and their games

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>are taking like two hours and forty minutes or something

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>crazy like that. So I mean I could see him

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 2>just sticking with the run. And again that is the

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 2>one place that the Jets are really tough on defense.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 2>They're injured up and down kind of the entire team,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 2>and they're vulnerable against the past. But again, I don't

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 2>really see Haskins being able to take advantage of that.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 2>So I'm totally fine with the two and a half.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it really stood out to me just because of

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 3>those because of those reasons.

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and again you liked it a one and a half,

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>So did I, and I said so on Monday, So

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>it is going to be one of my picks. It's

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>not probably one of my favorites, mainly because I'm just

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.119
<v Speaker 2>so beat down by the team.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for pointing.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Out that tweet, which by the way, was retweeting the

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 2>announcement that Adam Gase will be back next year and

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>then me doing the jiff of the wedding crasher singing

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>somebody kill me please. Anyway, that's how my life kind

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of is as a just then. But not for my

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 2>first pick. Now, I'm going to go with an over

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>under here, which I've been having a little success, what's

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>been on a nice run, and I'm sticking with the

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>team that's kind of been my favorite to stick with

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>the Unders and that's the Bears, and I'm going to

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 2>take the Bears and the Rams under thirty nine and

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a half. So I've had the Bears under here a lot,

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and as I said, it's been a pretty solid bet,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and I hit on it last week. And look, both

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 2>these teams are solid on the under. They're both six

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and three on the under on the season. And it's

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a pretty simple explanation. You know, you don't need to

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>be an expert to really be able to figure it out.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Both teams have poor offenses, and yes, the Rams have

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>a poor offense, and both both teams have strong defenses,

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 2>relatively strong defenses, not with the Bears on offense. Look,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>we know all the issues with Trubisky. He had a

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 2>good game against the Lions, but you really can't bank

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>on that again, and even then they only scored twenty points. Anyway,

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>he was like a hitter that got really hot, I

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>think for a couple of drives, right, because he looked

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>terrible to start off, then suddenly something clicked.

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't bank on that happening again.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 3>That's his entire career.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's true. I mean he's certainly this year

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>he's regressed significantly, which is unfortunate, But Dave Montgomery is

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 2>banked up. He's not a lock to play at this point.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I think he missed practice today and he was limited

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>after rolling his ankle the day before. And if not,

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm really not sure what they're going to do on

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the running game. They cut Mike Davis, Tarricohen can't really

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 2>carry a regular running back load. Ryan Knall is just

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>not going to be able to get it done. I mean,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I frankly, I hope I'm pronouncing that right, because I

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 2>really don't know too much about him. I don't know

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 2>much either, Yeah, so that's saying enough. Plus Trey Burton

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>is battling a thigh injury. He might even miss the game.

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>And look, I'm just I don't think that there's any

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 2>way that the Bears are going to be able to

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>stay in anything on offense, since they haven't been able

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 2>to do it all season, and especially against a Rams

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 2>defense that has really improved in recent weeks, particularly since

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>they added Jalen Ramsey, who's probably just going to take

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>on Alan Robinson and take away Trubisky's like lone reliable

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver. As a whole, the defense is playing better

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>lately Clay Matthews came back from his john jury. That

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 2>gives them another added dimension. So who's going to score

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the points on the Rams side?

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Offense is just broken, and it starts with their offensive line, right.

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's Andrew Whitworth and all backups at this point.

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And they've been dealing with issues on the line all year.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>They lost their center Brian Allen last week, they lost

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>their right tackle, Havenstein. I mean, golf's been terrible. They're

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 2>down Brandon Cooks, Todd Gurley does not look the same.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 2>Their offensive line is on like their fourth backups. And

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 2>remember last year when these two teams met, it was

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 2>fifteen to six in favor of the Bears, right, and

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that was back when Goff had a decent offensive line.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>They intercepted him four times. Now, this Bear's defense isn't

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the same as that one, I will admit. I mean,

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Khalil Mack has not been particularly disruptive. Eddie Jackson hasn't

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 2>done all that much. They're down to keep Hicks. They

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>just lost Danny Trevathan. But still they're able to get

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>pressure on the quarterback. And that is really what causes

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Gough to be unable to put up points. So thirty

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 2>nine and a half. Look, it's a low number, but honestly,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 2>absent a defensive scorer or two, I just don't see

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>how these offenses against these defenses are going to be

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>able to read to reach that number.

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I really can't disagree with you on that. We have

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 3>a huge Bear fan in my office, and when the

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 3>number hit thirty nine and a half, I was like,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I approached him, doing now with the over is thirty

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>nine and a half the number where we can attack

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 3>the over now? And he was just he just shook

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 3>his head. Traubisky has clearly, like you said, regress GoF

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>has his tune. For that matter, he only threw for you.

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Look at the numbers two hundred and forty three yards

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 3>last week. He took him forty one attempts to get

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>to two hundred and forty three yards. Like you said,

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 3>the Bears get a lot of pressure, and once he

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 3>starts moving his feet, he looked he rattles very easily

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 3>and his accuracy is out the window. I can't disagree

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 3>with this play raider. And also Mac also just loves

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 3>I know you said he hasn't been as good this year,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 3>but he always just on primetime. You always see him

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 3>much more effective in those games.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 2>It seems, honestly, it's just thirty nine and a half.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a really low number. It's not something where I'm

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 2>like jumping for joy over it. I believe the look

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>ahead might have been forty two. So there was a

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>ton of money that came in on the under for

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>good reason. But honestly, I mean it was a little

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 2>bit of the same thing last week with the Bears

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and the Lions, where the under was coming in heavy

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and they kept dropping the line. Doesn't really matter to me.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there really has to be a defensive score,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>which is always a possibility with these two offenses at

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>this point. But for me, I'll stick with riding the

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>under on both these teams, which has been pretty profitable.

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to your second pick here, what

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 2>do you got next pick?

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with the New England Patriots minus three and

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 3>a half at the Philadelphia Eagles, obviously being billed as

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 3>a Super Bowl rematch from a couple of years ago,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>but only one of these teams has a chance to

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>get back this year. Spoiler alert, it's New England. Everybody

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 3>knows that Patrick coming off a buye here and their

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>first loss of the season. Everyone can start with their Oh,

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots are done. Patriots are done, YadA, YadA, YadA.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 3>But they have to win two games and they'll be

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 3>back in the super Bowl, So I'm not too stressed

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 3>about it. Belichick loves losing a game. I think now

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 3>these last couple of years to kind of motivate his

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 3>guys a little more. And anytime you're gonna give Belichick

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 3>an extra week off to prepare for another team, that's

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 3>trouble for that team. They are fifteen and four coming

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>out of a buy in the Belichick era, only ten

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 3>to eight and one against the spread in those games.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles have a good rush defense, one of the

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.479
<v Speaker 3>better in the league, but that doesn't matter. The Patriots

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 3>only run to, I don't know, trick people every once

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 3>in a while that we're not gonna throw the ball

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred times a game, and that's gonna set up

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>well against an Eagle sect that just hasn't been very good.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 3>They have allowed at least one hundred yard receiver in

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>seven of their nine games this year. I think Edelman

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 3>and Muhammed Sanu could have some big games here Edelman

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 3>has been hauling a bunch of catches week after week.

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 3>It seems like he's a guy that's another guy you

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 3>can look at as a quick prop back to take

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 3>his over on reception totals, because he just seems to

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 3>go over every week. And he got an extra week

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 3>to rest his ailing hip, and it was another week

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 3>for Snow to learn the Josh McDaniels offense. Sanu was

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>on the field for one hundred percent of the Patriots plays.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>That's just kind of in his just in their last game,

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 3>so you can tell how much the Patriots like this guy.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>And I think he could have another big week here.

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 3>While Philly's offense has been mediocre at best this year,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Carson Wentz his completion percentage is down that obviously he

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 3>could have something to do with Jason Peters not playing,

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 3>but he could also be down two stars at WIDO

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>this week. Sean Jackson's already out and now also Jeffery's

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>coming up on the injury report, and that could be

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 3>big trouble because then New England can just leave those

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 3>excellent that excellent secondary out on Islands and just come

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 3>after Wentz and the run game, and that just I

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 3>think it just spells trouble for Philly all night. They

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and Philly is mostly played poorly against good teams this year,

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 3>and they're three and one at home, but those wins

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 3>are against Washington, your Jets, and Mitchell Trubisky, who were

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 3>just singing his praises so so kindly. I like the

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 3>pass to get them back on track this weekend cover

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>this one rather easily.

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So this probably would have been my number one pick

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>if you weren't taking it. I think here's the only

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>thing that worries me about this. I didn't I don't

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 2>understand this line. I mean that the pat the Pats

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 2>are a hugely public team, right, I mean everything about

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>this at that number screams to me that the Patriots

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>are just going to get an enormous amount of the bets,

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>an enormous amount of the money.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And when I.

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>See something like that, it makes me pause because you know,

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>you see lines like that on occasion you're like, this

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 2>line does not make any sense. It reminds me of

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 2>the Packers and the Chargers a couple of weeks ago,

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>where you know, the Packers are a really public team.

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>The line was something that said, like, Wow, the Packers

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 2>should pretty easily cover this, and then they got their

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>butts kicked against the Chargers.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 3>So we talked about that one in the office. That

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 3>was that was that seemed fishy all week to us,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>or like why why is that like that? And then

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of course they put up that stinker.

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And this one it's the same exact thing to me again,

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the Pats coming off the buy and coming off a loss.

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know what their record might be

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in the in the Belichick Brady era. I didn't even

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 2>know if it's happened. I wasn't able to look that up.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 2>But it seems to me like this is a spot

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>where they're just gonna come out. I'm sure you know,

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Brady already came out and said he's still not over

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl. What I mean, They're gonna come out here.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I get their offense is nowhere near what it used

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>to be, but still at this point, you know, given

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>them the extra time to prepare, especially given as you

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>pointed out the problems that are going on with the

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Eagles right now. And look, Jeffrey, I am going to

0:15:59.960 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>be shocked if he's gonna play at this point nothing.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 2>And if not, then You're gonna put Steffan Gilmour on

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>zach Ertz, and then you're gonna be looking at Okay,

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Nelson Agalore go ahead out there, or Jordan Matthews, our

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>new number one wide receiver, go ahead out there and

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>try to do something against this defense.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that the.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Eagles are gonna have a lot of, you know, a

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>difficult time scoring in this one. I think the Patriots

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>are going to be creative enough to make this happen.

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Jim Schwartz loves to blitz. That's what Brady

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>eats up. So I'm in complete agreement with you on this.

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>This one, honestly is my favorite bet of the week.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I admit the only thing that it gives me some

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 2>pause is the fact that.

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems too good to be true.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's sometimes are lines like that that

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you're just like, well, I'm just going you know, this

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>is I'm not gonna overanalyze at this point.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So I completely agree with you.

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's brought down a bit by the fact that

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 3>this is like Peterson did do so well against that

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Patriots team a few years ago, but these are different

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 3>teams now.

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, absolutely, I'm totally with you, So I'm completely

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>on board with that one. I'm gonna stick with an

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>over under for my second pick, and I'm gonna go

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 2>with the Raiders and the Bengals over forty nine. Now,

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders offense is really really good, kind of quietly

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 2>now people are catching on to them. It really all

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>starts with their offensive line, which has been dominant of late,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and Derek Carr has played really, really well because of it,

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 2>although he's also played pretty well even when he's under pressure. Now,

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the receivers are not elite. Tyro Williams is still battling

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Planter Fasciatis, Hunter, Renfros improvings. A Jones is there, but

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not like any of these guys really scares you.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>But they have an elite running back in Josh Jacobs

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 2>and an elite tight end in Darren Waller. So guess what,

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>The Bengals are pretty much the worst team in the

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>league against running backs and tight end. So there are

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna be plenty of points for the Raiders in this one.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 2>But I honestly think in this one, I don't know,

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 2>might be you know, kind of a hot take. I

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 2>guess I think the Bengals are going to put up

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 2>quite a few points in this game too. I get

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 2>that Ryan Finley's numbers were not great against Baltimore, far

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>from it, but I watched a lot of that game

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 2>and I kind of mildly impressed with him. I know

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>his numbers weren't good and he threw that horrible pick six,

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 2>but that's a really, really difficult defense, and he was

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>able to move the ball kind of up and down

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the field pretty easily. And the Oakland pass defense is

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 2>just kind of non existent. Put aside Philip rivers terrible

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 2>game last week, it's just not a solid defense. The

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 2>run defense is better. I think it's a little overrated,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 2>but it's better. But Joe Mixon got thirty carries last week,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>so in a game where they were getting blown out, right,

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So if the coaching staff is finally going to heavily

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 2>rely on their best offensive player, then I think that

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 2>probably pourtens good things for their offense. So in the end,

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I see a ton of points from the Raiders. I

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 2>see enough from the Bengals to get here. So you know,

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 2>forty nine's a high, not crazy high, but a high

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>over under. But I still think that they're going to

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>clear it and get into the fifties, so give me

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders and the Bengals over forty nine.

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Had no arguments for me there. This kind of leads

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>into my prop bet coming up, so I can't really

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>disagree too much. And Ryan Finley, I agree with you.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 3>I really liked him at enc State. He had a

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 3>lot of hit, a lot of potential coming into the draft,

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 3>and I think he could be a capable NFL quarterback.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I get that, you know, sort of

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>people were talking that, you know, how bad he was,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>But again, that was one of the games. You know,

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I have a bunch of games on Sunday. I try

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>to watch, you know, three or four of them at

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 2>once and then also have read zone on another thing.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 2>But that game I was watching closely because I really

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 2>wanted to see how it was. And again, the Ravens

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>defense is great, so you know, it wasn't like he

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 2>was amazing or anything like that. But I think it

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 2>was a little overblown because I do think that he

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 2>showed some good things. So I'm a little mildly bit

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of a believer in the guy as to having an

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 2>NFL career. So we'll see about that. But I look

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>forward to hearing your prop bet because mine might also

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>be from that game. But we'll see where we end up.

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Before we move on to your third pick, let's talk

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>briefly about bet mgm and the bet mgm Sports app.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>So go onto your app store, search for bet mgm

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Sports and download the app onto your phone, sign up

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 2>for an account, use our promo code Harris, and congratulations,

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you now have a risk free five hundred dollars bet. Yes,

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>risk free. There are no strings attached here, There's nothing

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>like that. Your first bet of up to five hundred

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 2>dollars is guaranteed. If you lose, bet mgm will credit

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 2>you the amount you lost up to five hundred dollars

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 2>for future wagers. And even if that was all you got, right,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 2>even if this was this one time, amazing risk free

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 2>bet followed by the opportunity to bet right from your phone,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>that would be awesome. But as you'll see, betmgm offers

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>a ton of boosted bets where you'll get these insane

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 2>odds on bets that are like borderline guaranteed money. They

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 2>have a ton of amazing other benefits as well, like

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 2>being able to track your bet in real time or

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 2>take an early cash out to lock in your winnings

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>or cut your losses. So again, just download the bet

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 2>mgm sports app, sign up for an account, use our

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 2>promo code Harris to get your risk free five hundred

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars bet. These winnings are paid in free bets. You

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 2>must be twenty one years or older. And although you

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 2>can sign up an easily deposit money anywhere, you must

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 2>be in the state of New Jersey to place a

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 2>sports bet, and certain trictions apply. Visit betmgm dot com

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 2>for the full list of terms and conditions. And if

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>you've got a gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler,

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Andrew, let's get on to your third pick.

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you got for number three?

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm joining you with a total here and I'm going

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 3>to go over fifty two in this weekend's game in

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Mexico City between the Chiefs and Chargers and hopefully it

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 3>returns there. The reports are that the field is in

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>good shape after last year's game was canceled or moved

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess at the last minute, but with the air

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 3>that then the elevation there is about seventy two hundred

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>feet for reference, for those who don't know Denver, which

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 3>is the mile high city is fifty one hundred feet,

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 3>so that's two thousand more feet in Mexico City, and

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I just I think there's going to be a ton

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 3>of points scored in this game. The Chargers have been

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 3>practicing at the Air Force Facility this week and that

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 3>has an elevation of six thousand feet. But to me,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 3>all that says is that you need to take the

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 3>thin air seriously, and I think it will end up

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 3>benefiting the offenses in the long run. I think those

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>defenses will gas faster, and I think that there will

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 3>be an opportunity for plenty of points. Mahomes looked like

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>his old self last week. Three tds four hundred and

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 3>fifty yards against what was supposed to be at least

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 3>a decent Titans defense. Put up thirty two points in

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 3>that loss, thirty to twenty five loss of the Titans.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 3>That's not really his fault, but now he faces a

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Chargers defense that ranks twenty sixth at DBOA. Casey Hayward

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>has struggled this year and that second or just isn't

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 3>the same without Derwin James, like they need him to

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>be effective, like Joey Bosa will obviously be disruptive at points,

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>but Mahomes show that he is capable, at least right

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 3>now on that knee, to still move around that pocket

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. And for the Chargers offense, they have

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 3>the exact weapons that you need to attack the Chiefs defense,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 3>and that's two talented backs. Melvin Gordon looks like he

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 3>it took him, like he had a training camp. He

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 3>had four weeks where he was terrible and they were

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 3>feet on the ball and it just didn't work. But

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 3>now the last two weeks he's been much better and

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 3>they've given him twenty plus touches a game. And then

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Austin Eckler will be able to take advantage of a

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs defense that have struggled with passing yards against running backs.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 3>So I just I think both teams have the ability

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 3>to score in this game, and I think fifty two

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 3>is I think this number is also just going to

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>go up the closer it gets to game time, So

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 3>jump on it as soon as you can.

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got no problem whatsoever with that pick.

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that I'd be shocked if this

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 2>isn't a huge scoring game. My one concern if I

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 2>was to raise a concern, and it's more Devil's advocate

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>is that you may thanks in the games that you

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 2>know the Chiefs have struggled a little bit, or that

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 2>you know when they first looked unstoppab before Mahomes got

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 2>injured and stuff like that.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the key to.

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Kind of winning those games was to run the ball

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>NonStop against their extremely weak run defense and that choose

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>up clock in the way to not allow Patrick Mahomes

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 2>to jump back onto the field and score in thirty seconds,

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 2>right you want to keep him off the field as

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 2>much as possible. You make a great point. Gordon is

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>running extremely well right now, essentially like he had his

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>training camp. Is there any concern though for you in

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 2>thinking about the over that the Chargers just come out

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and just basically ball control the heck out of this

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>thing and just basically say we're going to keep that

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 2>defense on the field for as long as possible. We're

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna have these really really long drives relying on the run.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Because that is my only concern and one of the

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 2>reasons why it wasn't one of my picks.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I like the over. I think that it's gonna get better.

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 2>I agree that it's the number is going to go

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>up because especially in Mexico City.

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But that was my one concern about.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.239
<v Speaker 3>That, is it conceivable that the Chiefs run defense is

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 3>so bad that it'll be like a fast paced offense.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Uh, that's actually a fair point. And you know the

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>thing about Gordon by the way last week against the Raiders,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.239
<v Speaker 2>he must have been hit in the backfield on like

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.959
<v Speaker 2>half of his runs, right, and he just like willed

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>himself to getting free and stuff like that. So he

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 2>will certainly gain chunk yards on a lot of those runs.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 2>And again, to me, I don't really think it matters

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 2>because I think Mahomes is capable of you know, leading

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>a two minute you know, scoring drive on any given point.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 2>You have a short slant to you know, Tyreek killer

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>McCole Hardman, who you know took that pass last week

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 2>where he was basically in the grasp of two guys

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 2>and he just like turned on the after does and

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 2>just ran right past them so they could score at will.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 2>So I agree, I'm going to take the over when

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I make my picks on bettingpros dot com.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That was the only reason why I got a little

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about it.

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I'm saying, yeah, could you tell he

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 3>was happy to have Hill back though, like that was

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the first time they were like that, that offense was

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 3>fully healthy since like minute five of a week one

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 3>he targeted eighteen times or something like that.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it shows you, unfortunately, how bad the defense

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is considering they still lost that game despite the fact

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 2>that they were dominant, although they should have won of course.

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 2>All Right, for my final pick, I'm going to get

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 2>off the over unders and I'm gonna take a spread,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 2>and that is the Bills laying six and a half

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 2>to the Dolphins. Now I got this on bettingpros dot

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 2>com when it was six. The line has moved up

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 2>a bit. I'm still gonna take it as long as

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it's under a touchdown. So I think the Dolphins are

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 2>justifiably getting some backing lately from betters. They've won two straight.

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I think they might have covered their last five games.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 2>They're clearly not tanking at this point. But I just

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think that the Dolphins are a very good football team,

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact that they have beaten the Jets, one

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 2>of the worst teams in football, and the Colts with

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Brian Hoyer and no t Y Hilton. So look, they

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 2>don't have Xavin Howard anymore, they don't have Kenyan Drake,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>they don't even have Mark Walton anymore. They don't have

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Preston Williams. And I get it. We can't rely on

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>them intentionally tanking anymore. That was sort of the big thing.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 2>They might put up a fight in the first half,

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 2>and the second half they literally just be like, wait, wait,

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>we don't want to win this game. So that though,

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 2>does not change the fact that they're just not particularly

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 2>talented and it's hard to see them doing much offensively

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>against the Bills that has a pretty elite pass defense.

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they pressure at the quarterback regularly, they have

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 2>very good cornerbacks. They're week at the running defense right

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>that's definitely where you attack them. And the Dolphins have

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Klin Bilage. He was awful last week in a featured role.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 2>He's been awful all season. He is the irresistible force

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 2>of running back futility over there. I mean, and offensively,

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the Bills are not great, but they can move the ball.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 2>John Brown's consistent Devin Singletary is getting more work. They'll

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>score enough points and probably at a defensive score against

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Fitzpatrick at this point. I mean, this was a

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 2>seventeen point spread a few weeks back. I don't see

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the teams being all that much different now. The Bills

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 2>are coming off a loss. They're probably angry. So for

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>me under a touchdown, I'm gonna take this one.

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I get to counter you here in our best

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 3>to avoid because I'm not touching it.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, all right, well that is gonna I'll recap

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 2>that in a second, but then let's move on. It's

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>a trap because that sounds like where you're going is

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 2>this year. It's a trap and avoid this game I'm

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>going to it's a oh no, go ahead, go ahead counter.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 3>For everything you said, I think this line is probably

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>a little lower than it should be because of this

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>recent success. The Dolphins are for inexplicably the best bet

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 3>over the They haven't not covered or spread since thereby,

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I think, well, the Bill's defense is good, touch overrated

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 3>just a touch and the offense you're putting faith in

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen to cover at least a mediocre number, not

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 3>a huge number. But I just I am very much

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 3>on the Josh Allen still hasn't proven anything to me

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of train I want to see more from him.

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>He's still inaccurate. He's obviously very talented running the football,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 3>but it just makes me. He makes me so uncomfortable.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 3>He might be the new Marcus Mariota for me. I

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 3>know that might be a little blasphemous, but sorry, Bill's Mafia.

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>They probably should have lost the Dolphins a few weeks ago,

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 3>and they're only scoring eighteen, like just over eighteen and

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>a half points when they're on the road and you

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 3>want them to cover almost a touchdown, I guess the

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 3>number is going to be really important. Maybe at six

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 3>and lower. I'd say the Bills six and a half

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 3>are higher, maybe the Fins. So maybe that's one of

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 3>the reasons I'm staying away. But these, like you said,

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 3>they're clearly not tanking anymore. Maybe maybe Flores wants Chase

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Young instead of one of those quarterbacks because Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 3>thinks he has a job in the future. I guess

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>he just is just gonna keep throwing footballs until people

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 3>tell him to not throw footballs. The Bills. Your logic

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 3>is one hundred percent correct. The Bills should win, they

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 3>should cover. I just I can't I can't put I

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 3>can't put the faith in Josh Allen.

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 2>So I hate to support your argument in any way,

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>but I will say this. On bettingpros dot com, one

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 2>of the things that you can do is you can

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 2>look at you know, there are hundreds of experts that

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, or over one hundred experts that put in

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>their picks onto the site, and right now there are

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty two of them and there will be more as

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 2>it goes on that have put in their picks. At

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.719
<v Speaker 2>some point this week it is fifty percent on Buffalo

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and fifty percent on Miami. Well that's fine. How are

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the most accurate experts doing the top twenty percent of experts?

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>How are they picking that game? Because you can see

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 2>that on bettingpros dot com too, Well, fifty percent are

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 2>taking Buffalo and fifty percent are taking Miami. That's the

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 2>definition of a game you avoid. But you know what,

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't care. I'm that's fine. I'll be one of

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the ones who's going with it. Yeah, look I get it.

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And I want to be clear.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>First of all, please don't piss off Bill's mafia because

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>they are they are tough.

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They are tough. I went to school in Buffalo.

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to get on their bad side, but

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I agree, I do not have faith in Josh Allen

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 2>as a passer. I mean, he has done nothing to

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, cure my concerns about him in the preseason

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 2>that he's incredibly inaccurate. But I really think that they

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 2>can still move the ball up and down the field,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 2>relying primarily on their run, you know, getting enough to

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 2>John Brown or short passes to Colbizy or something like that.

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't expect them to put up a ton of

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 2>points here. I wouldn't argue with an under necessarily, but

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I really think in the end it's gonna just be

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 2>way too tough for the Dolphins to put up points here. Again,

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I like their pass defense. I mean, it sounds like

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 2>you're not quite as high on it as I am.

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I really like it.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I think their run defense is super vulnerable, and again

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that that's the only thing the Dolphins cannot do I

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 2>mean at all, is run the ball whatsoever.

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And again, I think the loss of Preston Williams is

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a big one. And you know they played with a

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>him last week. But you know, MIKEASICKI whatever, Devanta Parker's

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 2>had a fine season.

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But really for me, that.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Was a good pronunciation. I would have messed that up.

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh thanks, man. I pride myself on pronunciations. That's why

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 2>we will messed up on the Bears backup running back there.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, look in the end, I get it, and

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 2>obviously you know the consensus of the experts are with

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 2>you too. But for me, if for no, if you're

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 2>under a touchdown, so you said, you know, six and

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 2>a half or over now under a touchdown, for me,

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine once it gets the seven, if it gets there,

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 2>which I don't necessarily think it will. If it gets

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>to seven, i'm out. I don't want the full touchdown

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. But if you're below the key

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>number of seven, I'm really okay taking them for me,

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 2>So I think you know I'm gonna go with that.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So look, we jumped ahead to it's a trap. But

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 2>let me very quickly recap what we did in pick six.

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 2>You are going to be taking the Pats laying three

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 2>and a half against the Eagles, and the Jets are

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>getting two and a half against the Redskins, the Pats

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 2>laying three and a half against the Eagles, and the

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs and the Chargers over fifty two on Monday night

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 2>in Mexico City. I'm going to be taking the Bears

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and the Rams under thirty nine and a half, the

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Raiders and the Bengals over forty nine, and the Bills

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 2>laying six and a half against the Dolphins. But you

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 2>have already given your it's a trap, so I get

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to now give mine, and mine is I'm going to

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>avoid the Vikings laying ten and a half to the

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>bronc That's a really, really big number and you look

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 2>at it, and the Vikings should easily win this game.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>But they're coming off this huge win against the Cowboys

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 2>in primetime on Sunday Night. They've got a buy next week.

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly a spot where they could easily just like

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 2>look past it and be like, all right, we're gonna

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 2>just easily take care of business here against the Broncos.

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 2>We've got the relaxation by coming up, and then we'll

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 2>get forward going, you know, finishing out the season strong.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 2>They're also most likely to still down Adam Thielen here.

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't been ruled out. There's a chance, I believe

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>is the quote I heard that he could play, but

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I highly doubt he's gonna suit up here. Meanwhile, on

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the other side of the Broncos defense continues to play

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 2>relatively well. Brendon Allen wasn't great, but he managed the

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 2>game okay in a game that they won last week.

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Now they're off a bye, They've had the extra week

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to prepare for this, So I could see some value

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 2>here in the Broncos getting a number that high, But

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings are just such a better team, and I

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 2>just cannot get behind a team like the Broncos playing

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 2>on the road, who probably can't take advantage of the

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 2>big deficiency in the Vikings past defense with Brandon Allen

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 2>as quarterback.

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So for me ten and a half, when you get.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 2>A spread like that, I always look at the team

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 2>getting the points, and again last week kind of showed

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you why Atlantic came out there and really did a number.

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 2>But for me, it's just not something where I would

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 2>feel comfortable taking the Broncos. So it's a game I'm

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 2>running away from entirely.

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you believe in Kirk Cousins yet?

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Look, I did I say something negative about Kirk Cousins.

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Are you just asking any generic sets?

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 3>No, you didn't, just the general generic Kirk Cousins is

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 3>not good kind of analysis. It's an I have personally,

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I have been shocked about his play. Seventy one percent

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 3>completion percentage, seventeen hundred yards, fifteen dutchhdowns, one interception in

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 3>his last six games or something like that, five six games.

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 3>It's been shocking.

0:34:58.200 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it's been good to see them open

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 2>up the offense a little bit and rely a little

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 2>bit more in the past, although you know they don't

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 2>always need to.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook is such a stud.

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I certainly was never as down on Kirk Cousins as

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I felt like most people were.

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like a guy like.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Cousins, we've seen enough to know he's a quality NFL quarterback.

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 2>And perhaps again it's me as a Jets fan, where

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>you have a lifetime of watching, you know, these are

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks that really can't play the position that when you

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 2>see someone like Cousins, you're like, oh, yeah, that guy

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 2>can totally run an offense without any problems.

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>So look, whatever they're doing.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I really like, if I was forced to take one,

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'd probably take the Vikings just because I

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 2>really don't feel confident right now in the Broncos' ability

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 2>to score despite what they did in their last game.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But for me, this is a trap.

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:44.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot of points.

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's too many points for me to feel comfortable.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 2>So you are avoiding the Bills giving six and a

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 2>half to the Dolphins, I'm avoiding the Vikings laying ten

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and a half against the Broncos. Now, before we get

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 2>to our final segment, I want to remind everyone about

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>our giveaway. It is a signed Odell Beckham Junior Cleveland

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Brown's helmet, and our contest is running through November thirtieth,

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 2>so you still have a little bit to enter. Now.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 2>You can go to betting pros dot com slash contest

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 2>for more details. But if you want to enter, just

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 2>leave a review for the show on Apple Podcasts or

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Stitcher and send a screenshot of that review to contest

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 2>at bettingpros dot com now. An entry into this contest

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>gets you automatically entered into all future contests, So if

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 2>you've entered a previous contest, you're automatically entered into this one.

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 2>So you might as well go ahead, get your review

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 2>in and send the screenshot of it to contest at

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>bettingpros dot com Now that Beckham helmet and all of

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 2>our signed helmets. They come from Pristine Auction, where they

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 2>offer a ton of great memorabilia with thousands of auctions

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 2>every day, and when you go there, use our promo

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 2>code Betting Pros and win a free five dollars voucher instantly.

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 2>So just go to Pristineauction dot com. That's p RI

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I S t I n E Auction dot com. All right,

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 2>let's finish up with our topprop and I believe you

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that it's coming from the Raiders Bengals game, so

0:36:58.160 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>go ahead.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Hey it is. It's that elite running back you mentioned,

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 3>Josh Jacobs. He's I haven't seen any official numbers on

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>the board, but I've seen an at least prop on

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the board for ninety six yards and then you can

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of make the assumption that that's usually about eight

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and a half to ten percent higher than the total

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 3>will be. So I'm going to take Josh shape It

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Gibs to go over eighty nine and a half rushing

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 3>yards this week, and for me, this one's pretty simple.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 3>You broke down the Bengals pretty quickly, one of the

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 3>worst rush defenses in the league. They're allowing one hundred

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and seventy three yards per game on the ground and

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 3>ranked twenty ninth in DVOA and not only giving up

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of yards. They're giving up a lot

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 3>of yards in bunches. Sixteen plays of twenty or more

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 3>this season, and the Raiders are just going to run

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the ball up there. That's the game plan. They have

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 3>one of the like you said, like you also mentioned,

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 3>they have one of the best offensive lines in football,

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:58.720
<v Speaker 3>surprisingly to me, and Jacobs is averaging nearly twenty attempts

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 3>per game and ninety yards per game. I just I

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 3>am excited to back this one wholeheartedly, Josh Shacobs. I

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 3>think he's gonna break a big one and go over

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 3>this one. We'll say in like the third quarter.

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, this is a great one. But let

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 2>me let me ask you something, all right. Let me so,

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at at points bet right now now they

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 2>offer kind of the at least this, So I'm gonna

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 2>give you the odds. I'm gonna give you the vig

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 2>So you tell me which one is your favorite. You

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 2>can get him at seventy five or more rushing yards

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.760
<v Speaker 2>at minus two sixty four. So that's a pretty big,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>big prize right there. You can get him to go

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 2>over one hundred rushing yards at minus one oh six.

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 2>You can get him to go over one hundred and

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty five rushing yards for plus two forty, or you

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 2>can get him at over one hundred and fifty rushing

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 2>yards at plus four to twenty five. Out of curiosity,

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 2>which one of those is your favorite?

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 3>The responsible better in me says the one hundred yards

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 3>at the minus one oh six or whatever that was.

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 3>But if if he's gonna go over, I think he's

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna he might go way over. And that led almost

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 3>four and a half to one at plus one fifty,

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 3>like that might just be worth a little sprinkle.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I love it.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd probably go one twenty five. I'd split the baby

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 2>at plus two forty and I'd take it there because

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I do think he's gonna get there. Because I completely

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 2>agree they're gonna win this game pretty handily and they're

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna rely on him all day long. And he he

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 2>is great man, he is really he's a future. Yeah,

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 2>he is just he runs hard, he's he's just really good.

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 2>And again, as we talked about, they have a great

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>offensive line so I love the bet completely. Now I

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 2>am going to stick in that game, and I'm gonna

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 2>go on the other side of the ball, and I'm

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with Joe Mixon to go over seventy five

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 2>rushing yards at minus one thirteen. So, as I mentioned,

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Mixing got thirty carries last week in a game in

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 2>which the Bengals were blown out from the word go right,

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean they had the touchdown to Mark Andrews in

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 2>like thirty seconds.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 1>That was just done. The game was over.

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So whether they're just trying to protect Ryan Finley or

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 2>whether or not, it's kind of a new philosophy here

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 2>where they're gonna rely more heavily on the run. I

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>think you're going to see a ton of work for

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 2>mix In, regardless of what the score is. And if

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 2>he sees twenty to twenty five carries, he's easily going

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 2>to surpass seventy five yards, even with the fact that

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 2>they have a terrible offensive line, and even with the

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 2>fact that the Raiders have done a pretty good job

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 2>of holding opposing running backs in check. As I said,

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't really believe that the Oakland Rush defense is elite.

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's far more about the fact that their

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 2>pass defense is just terrible, and I think that that's

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 2>really where you attack them. I think you can still

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 2>attack them generally on the run. And again, seventy five

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 2>yards is not a huge number, and it's only minus

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 2>one thirteen. You looked at what we said, Jacobs was

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 2>minus one oh six at one hundred yards, So if

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 2>you can get mix in at seventy five yards at

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 2>minus one thirteen again, between the two, I think Jacobs

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 2>is like the lock.

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Of the week.

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Frankly, whichever way you go over one hundred, great, I

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 2>think that's going to be there. But in this one, Honestly,

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 2>even though I expect the Raiders to win, I'm fairly

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 2>confident that Mixon is going to get the workload to

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 2>allow him to pretty easily.

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Surpass seventy five rushing yards.

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 3>No complaints for me.

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 2>We're on the same game even so, you know, you

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 2>and I can watch that and we can you know,

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:10.959
<v Speaker 2>message each other and hopefully not be both pretty happy

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 2>at the amount of apure that. Yeah, absolutely, all right,

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna do it for today's show. Thanks again for

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:18.879
<v Speaker 2>joining me, and to remind everyone where they can find

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 2>more of you.

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>And your work.

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 3>You can find me at covers dot com and on

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Twitter at Covers Underscore Kayley. We also have a brand

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 3>new app that's that you can download and test out.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 3>It's great for bet tracking line moves and we've got

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 3>these cool things called sweat alerts. So if you set

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 3>a line and your team is only covering by a

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 3>point or so, you're gonna get an alert and be like, hey,

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe go hedge this bet somewhere else. And it's just

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 3>a cool little thing you need to go and check out.

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, that honestly sounds like a really great thing for

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 2>better So everybody definitely go check that out and make

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 2>sure to follow Andrews a great follow on Twitter. So

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 2>thanks again for coming on, man, I really really appreciate it.

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 3>No problem, I'm happy to be all right.

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 2>I want to remind everyone about bet mgm, where you

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 2>can get a risk free five hundred dollars bet when

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 2>you go and download the betmgm Sports app and sign

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 2>up using our promo code Harris, and don't forget to

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 2>leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher and

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>send a screenshot of that review to contest at Bettingpros

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 2>dot com to be entered into our Odell Beckham Junior

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 2>signed helmet giveaway. Good luck with your wagers this week

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 2>and my friends, we'll be back breaking down the early

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 2>lines for week twelve on Monday