WEBVTT - Our 2025 First Base Tier List (with Jolly Olive)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Waken Jake. As we are in

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>tier list season and we are doing first base. This

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a breeze right first base. Put the

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>best hitter you got and let him catch the ball.

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>This will be one of the ugliest tier lists we

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do this year. I am joined by Jolly Olive BBD

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, we normally like to get

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>some tiers in front of you. We have some concepts

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed. First base might blow some people's minds what

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we're about to stumble into because there is a pack

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of Lamont Wade our guy Vinnie p that I there

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>is a middle tier of first baseman that I currently

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to slice up. Jolly, what was that?

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Was that a dance move?

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 2>It's the only position I didn't get to play in

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Little league. Okay, so I'm a little biased against first basemen.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>They got to live dreams that I never got to live.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>First base is a nightmare.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's a little messy. It's a little short guy,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 2>But I always wanted to try. I could pick it.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>If it was high, I can't get there.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you didn't want that. I had a couple games

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:09.559
<v Speaker 1>and that was just a bad time.

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>At least you got those get it first. It's just

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>everyone's just looking at you.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Luckily, these guys are tall. We will find out who

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the shortest player is coming up. Probably a Rise, Probably

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a Rise. He's listed. He had a nice Instagram post,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>him and his wife, a bunch of kids. Everyone is

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>looking good.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's spend thirty minutes on that.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Vaughan, don't say that to me. We won't start there.

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's what we're gonna do normally. We we have the list,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and we I think we have our S tier. There's

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>been a couple names thrown out, but we're gonna do

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this traditional tierless style. We're gonna start off S tier

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>ABC D, and then we're gonna separate as we go

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because I'll be honest, I'm a little frazzled. The S

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>tiers kind of clear. There's a couple guys you can

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>negotiate up or down and may maybe we will look

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at that.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>That's nice. The whole squad man you show out looks great.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Miami Rise kind of has a see through shirt going on,

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like that's that's the vibe. That's what I want.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, he's still a padre right, that didn't change.

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll see by the time this comes out.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, kind of flexing his wife, kind of

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 2>big time half those slides. We're just her.

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>We love that for her. So we're going traditional tierless

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>s tier ABCD, and I think we can chew off

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the top jolly. I think we mutually agree that there's

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>four that deserve to be at the top. I think

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>there's one guy that could make a push for a

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>solo one, but he doesn't have quite the resume yet.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to dive in?

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the way I'm sectioning this off is

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the guys that are either getting paid nine figures or

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>are going to get paid nine figures as first baseman. Uh.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 2>The one who's going to paid nine figures is vladimirker

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Or Junior. This is his walky year. He's coming off

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic bounce back year, bounce back in the way

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 2>that he was always good, but that was a truly great,

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>elite caliber season last year. Nine ops, thirty bombs, one

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 2>of three RBIs career one thirty seven ops plus he's

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be twenty six. He could get better, you

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 2>never know, uh, And he's gotten better defensively, and we

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>know how feared of a slugger he is. He will

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 2>be the ball or the bell of the ball at

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>next year's fore agency class. I think I had it

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 2>right and he belongs at the top, no doubt in

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>my mind.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think, oddly enough Laddie with what he did

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. If there's anyone who has a claim to

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be on top top, it is Vladito. Yes, six point

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>two war ninety ops one sixty six ops plus. I

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>mean the way he finished last season, and when I

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>say finished, I mean basically the second half of the year,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>finished sixth in MVP. I do think I think Gladdy

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>grew up a little bit. He's turning twenty six in

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple weeks. Youth factor goes for him that there

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>may be more in the tank or last season just

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>might be the regular. He does have a career one

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven ops plus, which is lower than I think.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>It's lower than Harper. I believe it's lower than Freddy career,

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's lower than Olsen's career. So there's definitely people

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that would come on here and say Olsen should maybe

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>be a tiered down. I think I think the two

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>arguments that Bryce and Freddy are linked for life. That's

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just how it goes. Olsen and Freddy also linked for life.

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Matt Olsen's last year, you can make an

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>argument a tier down. I think it was a weird

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>year and the year before that, as you've noted, Jolly

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty four homers, one hundred and thirty nine rbs and

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>six oh four slugging all at the NL.

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>A better better than what Vladdie did last year.

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olson correct put it in context, Matt Olsen has

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>played every game the last three seasons.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>And that matters to me.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That's cool that, Yeah, I think I hope that the

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>tierless next year, as Vladimir Guerrero Junior on a tier

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>all by himself or maybe with another one of these

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>guys like Bryce Harper's still new to first base. Yeah,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>how silly is that in the defense, Like he grades

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>out well for a first baseman, which nobody grades out

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>well for a first baseman. So that's kind of cool

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>to see. And yeah, Matt Olson with a hot April

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>could be on track for another fifty homer season. Also,

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olson thirty two point eight career war.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Madd Olson's entered like an interesting conversation.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he'd have to, he'd really have to keep

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it rolling until he's thirty five to.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not saying that he's going to make the

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame, but I think his interesting conversation is

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 2>he had one quote unquote down year where he was

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>still a four or player, hit thirty home runs and

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>played every single game, Like, oh, I guess he's not

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>among the elite. Adilson's still really really good and he

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>definitely belongs up here. So I had like that slight

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>moment of like do we move him down? Because you

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>can see a world where it's those three and it

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of looks right right, But Matt Olson definitely belongs

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>up there.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they all belong. I could see any of

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>those players having a better year than everyone else on

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the list, Vladdie with the easiest up potential, and honestly

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Father Time and Freddy when does it happen? Thirty five

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened yet. Last year the numbers ticked down, But

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>when I say tick down, one hundred three oh ps plus,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>like they ticked down for Freddy Freeman. He hit three

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>point thirty one the year before to eighty two last

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>year got six and a half war.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>It's Freddy Freeman, like a first ballot Hall of Famer.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Kind of feels like.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, world series. I'll tell you what also matters, World

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>series and being liked by the media. He's been MLB's

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>media darling for eight years now.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I think Freddy's the first bound Hall of Famer.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Poppy and he was a d H didn't even.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Play the field.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Eh, let's leave that s here. We'll see if we

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>need to circle back and separate anything I think we've done.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we've done good there. Do you want to

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>do the next tier or do we want to?

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to some of the bottom I don't

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>want to do any of those. I know it's a

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 2>disturbing mess. I have a couple pairings that I like,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and then after that it's kind of out the wazoo.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Soderstrom on the A's of course, please don't say

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that into the microphone had some nice numbers last year.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Scaring people had some nice numbers last year. Jolly.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I have Paul Goldschmidt and Carlos Santana group together. They

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 2>got paid roughly the same money and free agency. They

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>serve kind of similar roles. They're club first dudes who

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 2>are a little bit on the older side, who can

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>still hit at you know, league average above league average.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I have them somewhere in the middle in a tier

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 2>called your dad's old glove, your dad's old glove, your

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 2>dad's old glove that he gave to you as like

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>your first really good like you had your little league

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>glove and now you have your first good glove to

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>your dad's old glove. He's been using it for years.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Man Carlos Santana turns thirty nine in April. Damn Paul

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is a young thirty seven and about to have a

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>massive season. Uh okay, so BBD naturally put that in

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the Sea tier for now. We can call it your

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>dad's old glove. I'll be interested to see if anyone

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we think deserves to be lumped in with them. And

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it's got a very similar contract.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Open to discussion. Because Paul goldschmianth was in our second

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 2>tier last year next to Bryce.

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Harper, Well Goldie took a step back, and we're talking

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>about Matt Olsen and could he reach Hall of Fame

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and Harper Freddy like Paul Goldschman's got that sixty two

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>point eight war in the bag and he had an

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred ops in the second half of last year.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Does he find the porch a couple of times? The

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>pin stripes? The pin stripes?

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>What's look at Paul Golchmith's Sprayshart, Are you getting it?

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Did he go with any home runs like one opo home?

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 2>You went for a homer twice last year?

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>It's PPP prep season. A lot of the nerd sites

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>do say he will pep with that porch? Well, he

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>would have. I think he would have gained like three

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>homers as a yank last year. We'll figure that out.

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Two years removed from MVP one. Yeah, and uh hey,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe he needs to wipe the cardinal off of him

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit. Uh tell me, who is your

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite cardinal free agent signing this year? That's rude, blank

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>blank space.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was thinking.

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>We are recording this February tenth, that should be noted.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 2>The Piaveta welcome, come on down.

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Mets.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 2>No, we don't need a picture to who to Saint Louis. Okay,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>he looks like a cardinal.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean? No, he does. Let's see what

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Olds do this year as they are fighting for ground.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Paul goldschmid seven point four War, three point one War,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>one point three War. So there's a nervous side of that.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Santana was kinda on that boat and last year

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just said, fuck it was bad. So we respect your

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>dad's old glove. Let's see what gets filled in above them.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump to the second tier. When we go from Olsen, Harper,

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Vladito and Freddy, I guess who's the first name.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Pete, which is weird because I feel

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 2>not one hundred percent confidence saying that, but I feel

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 2>like he can't go any lower than that, right, I mean,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 2>he's the biggest home run bat on this list.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because it's twenty twenty five. Yes, you get

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>paid in free agency for what you're about to do,

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't get paid for what you've done that. I

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>think the two names that were the hot topic at

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>first base this offseason, Pete and Christian Walker, both have

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>their argument. Pete's going to get at least thirty million

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars to play baseball for this upcoming season, and if

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>he plays well, he will cash in even more than that,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or he's got an insurance policy for next year. Christian

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Walker got the contract everyone kind of expected, and it's

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole two way. He leads every defensive first base

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>metric you could possibly look into while being a very consistent.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But I haven't looked at Christian Walker's numbers. He was

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a hot topic of this free agency and then he

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't ops plus the last three years one twenty one

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's won the Gold Glove all three of those years.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>His war has gone down per year. He will be

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>turning thirty four on March twenty eighth. Is that opening day?

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I I'm very interested to see. Arizona's a good

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>place to hit. That's been a good lineup. He was

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable there.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 2>These two feel linked to they currently are. Yeah, they

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>just feel like, like in the same way that like

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Freddy and Olson are kind of always connected. These two

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>feel like they're gonna be connected even though they're very

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 2>different players. Yes, like Walker's glove first and like very

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>consistent offensively. Pete definitely not a glove first dude, but

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 2>he has like the offensive volatility where like one year

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 2>he could put up forty six homers and people aren't

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be like surprised, you know what I.

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Mean, maybe this year I'd like that, you think so

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd like it.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And Uncle Steve's got to get that check book out.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 2>I think he's good for it.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>What if he wants flatty pork dose.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a DH spot in the National League.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Now Pete to third. Okay, let's party the dos. I

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think those two begin this. The question is my one

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>other name here feels wrong? Okay, but then you look

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at his page and he absolutely belongs to be next

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to some of these guys.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>But maybe not.

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm having a really tough time with Nathaniel Lowe. I

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>think we all are at a really tough time with them.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 2>He's never been below the average offensively in his six

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>year career. Last year he was a one twenty ops plus.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't have the home run power that Pete does,

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>and doesn't have quite the glove that Walker does, but

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>he kind of feels like a hodgepodge of the two.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's definitely more doubles than Homer's.

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Won the Silver Slugger in twenty two, won the Gold

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Glove in twenty three, and last year he had a

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>very Nathaniel low season, and.

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>He just feels better than the guys that are going

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 2>to be below them.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Can I tell you, Okay, here's a weird sniff test. Okay,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>White Texas trade him.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's so Jake Berger has more years of control,

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 2>and I guess they wanted to swap in one guy

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 2>for less money. He was more years of control. But

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I do think that Nathaniel loves the better player get

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a little more powerful.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I just signed John, they signed Jock, so that's your

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>lefty DH replacement. It's great for the next I guess

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they got Burger at a good value. So I don't know.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That's just been one that's thrown me off. And we're

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about you know, your network is your net worth? Wow,

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker got the contract maybe plus a year than

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>what people were expecting or I don't know. In the range.

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Pete was chasing AAV and blew his cover that he

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be a met, but he didn't get the

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>full contract he was expecting.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>He will be the highest paid for his spapes in

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>next year.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel Lowe was traded for Robert Garcia, and the whole

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>thing throws me off. It was from California. Robert Garcia

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is from California.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 2>And Robert Garcia is good. He's got three nasty pitches.

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>But it felt just like a years of control type thing,

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>which is a good way to build your roster.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And it was a team that was pretty desperate for bullpen.

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Health right, and the Marlins were dumb enough to trade

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Jake Berger who still had like tons of control. So, like,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I get it from that standpoint. And this is about

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Nathaniel the player. Not really like him getting traded. It's

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>just a weird discussion. Like I still don't really know

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>why it happened.

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Robert Garcia is good, he had a negative war

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>last year.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't where do you want to put him?

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Jacob, So there's Pete and Christian Walker, sure lump together

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for life. I like Nathaniel Lowe. I'll tell you one

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that's tormenting me, Wilson Contrara's I hate these here. I

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he can play the position, but if

0:15:59.920 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you tell me the hitter, I like, go look at

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>his offensive stats since and like these numbers, we'll probably

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>get better.

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>That You'd think he doesn't have to catch. You'd think,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>so does he? In the second tier of a position

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>that he's never played. I think I draw the line there.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen him play it. I don't know how

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Look well, like his bat's not that good, but it's good.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna get old headed out like he's tier.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 2>He's a name value list. It currently kind of is

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 2>name value list. So who's who?

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel Lowe?

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Third tier is good?

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Wilson contrere is. I'm just gonna yell some names real quick,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is there? I'm gonna yell every name. How about this,

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>here's a fun exercise. Okay, every name that I'm currently

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at that's frustrating me on what their value is.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Naylor, he has an argument, Sure, he has an

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>argument cosas yes and no, he's got to do it

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for like a year, but his stats are.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>But now he's got that full one sixty two and

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>it's nice.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, but he's got to do that for a full

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>one sixty two, Like would you rather? Would you rather

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>have a first base next year? Paul Goldschmid, Carlos Santana

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>or Tristan Cassas, Tristan Trists and Cossas. So that's coming up.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not even frustrated with that. I can figure

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that out. Vinny p might be too close to the

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sun there. That is what it is. We'll get there.

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Rhys Hoskins mm hmm.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little lower on him.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I am too, but also am I.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>It's the it's the leg injury, okay.

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamont Wade Junior on.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Base God, I think he's like, I think he led

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>first base in an on base percentage last year. I

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 2>don't don't need second.

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and Treres I already talked about that. YONDI Diaz

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>get rid of his slow start and he was a

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>baller again. I think there there's some nerd stat that

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he was top eighty fifth percent tile and sweet Spot contest,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Sage and the biggest hammer.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Come on.

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And then Nathaniel low like, I don't I don't know

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>how to separate these.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>So I've got some ideas. Sure, I think that we

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>make the B tier the my brain hurts tier, and

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>we just throw all these guys in there because they

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>all have like a hitch right. Wilson has never played

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 2>the position before.

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>He's never played first.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Casas doesn't have the full season. Nathaniel Lowe has just

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of been good, not great, And I don't mean

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that in a negative way. He's just been a solid,

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>good first baseman. But but Alonzo and Walker have had

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 2>great season.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>They can be game changers, right, game changer.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Naylor hasn't played your position right, doesn't rack up war.

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, did he had defense? Did he get

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>boosted by Cleveland getting rid of some outfield seats last year?

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, I forgot about that. That was weird.

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>His numbers landed, They're fine. The thirty one homer stand

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>out more than the ops plus the county. Okay, I

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>feel better with that.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Defensively he played with three other like great defenders are

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, like I feel like otherwise bad defense where

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he'd have to be scooping more like, do we talk

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about he's not a great defender. I was worried there

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be a much bigger conversation for Josh Naylor

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to be up on this list.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there is.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>He he slowed down in the second half last year.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize to what degree. In the first half

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>last year twenty two homers and eight one six ops.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>He slowed down in the second half.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>So okay with him like me and Dalton. Both the

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 2>dbacs acquired their new designated hitter, not their new first baseman,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 2>and he's their first baseman now, so we'll see easy.

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's all right, let's put those Okay, So

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>who's up there. That's Wilson, that's Low, that's Cassas, and

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that's Nailer and then Vinnie. Who would you rather have

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>next year? Goldie Santana or Vinnie Vinnie Vinnie. A part

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of me, I'm thinking that row is gonna become two rows.

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>A part of me was just gonna say, like, make

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that into two rows. My brain hurts, Please make my

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>brain hurt. Oh and that's Vinnie and Casus. Yeah, I'm

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>open to that. Let's make two rows there. We're gonna

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>need two rows.

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Because they also kind of feel like they go together.

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Cassas has just done more right, but he doesn't have

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a full season. Cassas has done it at a higher level.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I should say not having the full season hurts.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they both, Yeah, they're both. They're they're high in games.

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Is one thirty one and one thirty two for these

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>two guys.

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They again, I'm an OPS plus guy nowadays. Sure, Cossas

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>won twenty five ann he won six one twelve career.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Who's won eighteen last year?

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Kaufman's tough.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Coffin's tough.

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Fenway not tough fen Way, know it's tough.

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I might have just read the Rock stats. I was

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on Josh Naylor's page. Benny, where'd you go? There's Bennie

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Vinni's a career one sixteen ops plus. Yeah, this is

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be He's twenty seven, this is gonna be his.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's really only got one full season and

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that was last year.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying. They're kind of the same class,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Like they're both young people are both really excited for

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 2>what they can do, but also nervous because they haven't.

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Seen s get the full year and be a guy. Yeah,

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>where does Lamont Wade go? Has anyone ever seen him

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>play baseball? Honest question?

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Isn't he more an outfielder?

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Not so much as stop. I think he's a great

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>picker and not much else going on Defensively. I know

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there's some nerd stuff about, like he hits velocity and

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>spin both very well.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>His on base was one tick lower than his slug

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>that's his game.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>He gets on base.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.479
<v Speaker 2>He gets on base, that's valuable. That's extreme.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen moneyball?

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I heard playing first base is easy. That's what I heard.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>The last two years, two hundred and fifty two games,

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gone on at a three seventy six clip proposal.

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Lamont Wade does not great out well defensively at

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>first base and can hit. Do we agree on that?

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I can agree with that.

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Y Diaz does not grade out well defensively and can hit.

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I have another guy too, Luis.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Arias does not it out well defensively and can hit.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>That feels like a.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Group a couple batting title winners. There they.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Are contact over you just talk to me out of

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Wade being in there?

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, Well.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>You totally did.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh all three of them lead off?

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Do they really?

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I kind of love that.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one one b hitting one and one something like that,

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>one hitting one, one hitting one, one hitting one. Put

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that's above Goldie and Santana. Oh question Mark. The Olds

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>are flying down the board.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't feel right about them below. I think it's above.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Who would you rather have?

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>If I think, if we're being honest, I would rather

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>have Louis Arise Yandi is Lamont Wade gets interesting, but

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>every stat tells me I would if you could tell

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>me Lamont Wade Junior could get on at a three

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy three clip in front of Aaron Judge next year,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I would love Lamont Wage.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 2>And that that question is not who would you rather

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 2>have on the Yankees? It's would you rather have on

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a baseball team? Like take out defensive issues, whatever construction

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 2>of the roster, like who what what's the better player?

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the three of them move above, And it's

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 2>it's an age conversation too, you know what I mean?

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Like fall off? They could, they could fall bad.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>There's an argument that Paul Goldschmid has already already pinky old,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't it Yandy turns thirty four in August? That's okay, Cuban.

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I like the way we sorted that out.

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, we have some things happening.

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of tears.

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Good Wilson contraras Wilson. I mean, if he can catch

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball, he's going up.

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>He caught the ball for many years of his life.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Get a whole position named after it.

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>If his offensive season is repeated and he's fine at first,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I need to see the guy play first base. This

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that had problems catching.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Can I just say this is the weirdest contract of

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 2>the past five years is the Wilson Contrats Cardinals contract.

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Because they keep being mean to You're not our catcher

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're the reason we're losing. Actually, you will catch, though,

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're not going to trade anybody in the season,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna let everyone go and we're gonna

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>make you a first baseman even though you want to

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>be a catcher. He smells of a trade.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>There's four years left on the deal.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>But if he hits and he can catch balls at

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>first base.

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>They need to full reset.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, that's how they reset.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>God, don't trade him to Seattle. And there's my Seattle

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Mariner shrap real, which brings us to Luke Raley some

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>numbers that like him. I'm just gonna get Jonah bride

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on there.

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 2>See, this is the problem with the bottom is that

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of guys that have like one thing

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 2>going from.

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, let's let's clean up the bottom. I think Colt

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Keith hasn't seen him play the position. I haven't seen

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.959
<v Speaker 1>him play haven't seen him hit. I hope he has

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a very nice career. We thought we thought you were

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a Tree Sweeney last time.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 2>He did think you were.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>He's had a lot of appearances on this.

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 2>We didn't mean that.

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Anyone want to go to battle for Spencer Horowitz.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>You could hit a little bit. I feel bad putting

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>him at the bottom.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I kind of do too.

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 2>He's got after.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Strum, all right.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anything about Tyler.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Watch ball. Whyika there is no time for this?

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Why did he have a one? Fourteen ops plus?

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty brief but still a lot of games. He's

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like he was a real prospect.

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 2>His first round pick.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Was Oakland a's hit. Damn, no time for this kind

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of true.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Andrew vaugh Bottom kind of feels like we know who

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 2>he is at this point.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I wish I didn't I bought some Andrew Vaughn stock.

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Really I would love to get him anywhere else.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Twenty homers, seven fifty ops.

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Damn really no.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Nuts yr No. In my head, he had one in

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 2>my head. It was twenty twenty one, but he was

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 2>a rookie in my head.

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty two he was like legit good, which like

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>these are good numbers, but as a twenty four year old,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a very nice season in twenty twenty two for

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Andrew vaugh I thought we were building something.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, go ahead and make an argument for Andrew Bond.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>No no, no, no, no no. The bottom of this

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>list Jonah Bride, Sorry, new friend, but yeah, like you

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>know these young guys, you can talk yourself into Spencer Horrowich, Sure,

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's something in there.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that might be a teer.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Toglia, Like he hit, he hit twenty five last year.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>He's a Spencer Steer.

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's Spencer. I have Shanwell and that young guys.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk about conversation like what is he? Like?

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Does Cold Keith deserve to be with the young guys?

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.719
<v Speaker 1>He's had a full rookie year, slow starting good?

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, why is he?

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought the numbers were a lot worse. Okay, how

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>about the second to last tier before the olds? Yep,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>put Cold Keith up there?

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Wow?

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, hey, real prospect. He I didn't realize

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how close the league average the season got last year.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 2>So we're doing like a young guy's tier.

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Then, yes, these are guys that we have hope for okay,

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm looking at Chanel Januel.

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's another like high draft pick. They didn't sign

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>a first baseman because they believe in him.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Solder shrum Hive. Yeah wrong, right now?

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Another first round pick? Is this the first round picks?

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Tire these guys all first round picks?

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>A first round pick?

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Come on?

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Cole Keith is a fifth round pick.

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Andrew was the third overall.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I have some Andrew va on SoC and I'm still

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting on it.

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Who went after Andrew?

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Trade him to a good team.

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you know who went one and two in Indre

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Von's draft, Adley Rushman and Bobby but Jr.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm still a Vaughn guy, Riley Green two picks later,

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>j J. Bolda Carroll, I have Andrew Vaughn stock and

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going back. But maybe this is the year. Maybe

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the year. Like where does Michael Bush go? Man?

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Bush goes above these guys?

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, where do the Orioles belong with Michael? Michael

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Bush had almost three war last year, full season. Here's

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing, Top one hundred prospect. Here's what he

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>goes with Vinnie and Cassas. Yeah right, I'd like him

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to make my brain hurt. Rights.

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Plus, he's he's the only one with a full season

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 2>lefty right, Yeah, yeah, he does, he does. I think

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>he has more war than Passquatch and he's only played

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>one year.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. He's still a top one hundred prospect entering

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>last season.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I'd rather have him over Louise Orias.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. I mean, Louis rises a wrench in every conversation,

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'm saying kind of doesn't play defense, has an

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>argument for best contact hit or we've seen I'd rather

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have the guy that can also hit right. It starts

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>getting into your team a little bit. And Michael Bush

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>what if he gets better?

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Right? All three of those guys have the youth factor.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>The reason Michael Bush is a Cub is the Dodgers

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just didn't have room for him.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Literally didn't have room on the roster for him to play.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Who's in on Luke Rayley? Is that? You know what

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying?

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that how you normally start conversations.

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was not popular at the Super Bowl. He

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>feels like he belongs.

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 2>With Oh my god, is he not an outfielder?

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>He had one great year last year.

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Stats last year he's been good for multiple years.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>He's playing first base for the Mariners.

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 2>That's so messed up that they would do that to us.

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>By the time this is out, maybe they've signed Justin

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Turner and really will return to the outfield. But he's played.

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>He's played a lot of first base in his life. Also,

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>damn it, Luke Rayley is he in my brain hurts?

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit, man, it's a little bit. I

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think his savant is also pretty at times. There's actually

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a dark horse position for him. I think Luke Rayley

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>got some leadoff run last year.

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's check today.

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's check. Maybe I dreamt that the leading Okay, he

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>let off. He let off like eight times last year,

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think three games started up there. My

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>brain has that in it, but I don't know how

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to do anything else.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I have him in my brain hurts. He's the epitome

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of my brain hurts. I didn't think about Luke Raley

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>at all before this tier list, and I just discovered

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that he is.

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, do you brain hurts or please make my brain hurt?

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's You'd rather have Luke Raley than Tristan Cassas.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>That is a lie.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a lie.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>The test came back and said that.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Was that's a lie. But that's a that's a name

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 2>value thing. Dude.

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>We're getting name valued pretty hard.

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>We're getting name valued because Luke Raley is objectively, right

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 2>now a better player than Tristan Cassas, which is a

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 2>crazy statement because even I don't believe.

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That Luke Raley is six four two thirty five. Okay,

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like sprint guys, I was about to ask what sprint

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>speed you've got on He's like NIF or something. What

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Grayley flies? Luke Rayley's a.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Glitch eighty eightieth percentime ninety split. The difference, everything about

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 2>him that I've learned in the past five minutes. It's

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 2>made my brain hurt.

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>He's up there, He's like a lot of center fields.

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 2>And you owe it to Mariners fans? You do? You do?

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 2>You owe it to Mars fans. You're so mean to them.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:29.479
<v Speaker 1>This hurts my brain.

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 2>You look like brain hurts.

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>This is there's something beautiful about this, and there's something

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>horrible about this. I know I have Yankee syndrome, but

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>in my head, Goldie and Carlos Santana could have fine

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>years this season. Yondy arise, I expect to have very

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>strong seasons at what they do Wade. The expectations not there.

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But he gets on base, and that's how the Oakland

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Athletics almost won something. Barry Zito, Nope.

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Tim Hudson, no, think you older because Scott Hadiberg got

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 2>on base, Sully.

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>That reference was for my sister x Files, who's not

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>even on the board right now. Why don't you say

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>anything about Spencer Steer? Are you scared?

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I have no thoughts on him. I have him. Okay,

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 2>do you want to hear.

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>My you have? Where would you have? Have you had

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>had him?

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Your brain's fully broken thought, here's my tier at the bottom.

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 2>You're righty, at the bottom, below your dad's old glove.

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I have Jake Berger, I have the two Orioles first Baseman,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 2>I have Steer, and I have Hoskins. I have no

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 2>idea what I'm calling this tear, but they kind of

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 2>just feel like.

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It feels kind of wrong for him to be below

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the old But now I feel like we're getting rude

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to Santana.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Now we're getting really rude to Santa.

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You can almost pencil Jake Berder and for thirty.

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Homers you look like you're having a horrible time.

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I am, I mean, I'm maybe is it something about

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 1>like how are you hitting thirty homers? And there's part

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>of this that makes me just want to do it

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>as a thirty person tier list and just do like

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a gun to my head. Who do I want at

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>third base next year? Or first base? Jonah Bride your

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>last And I'm sorry, dude, and I don't know you,

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably a nice cat. See your first round pick?

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Why do I care?

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 2>He was?

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, twenty third round pick, Jonah Bride. Don't look at.

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 2>His ok Here's here's what we're doing, and this is final. Okay,

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 2>here's what we're doing. We're putting Bride and Vaughan together

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 2>with the whole hodgepodge of the young guys who haven't

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 2>really proved it yet but we're like weirdly interested in.

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's like Jose Miranda Spencer, Horowitz, Michael Tolia, Sean Well, Colt, Keith,

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Jonah Bride, Soderstrom, Vaughan. That's a tier. All of them are.

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Just a tier one line.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one line, because that's that's what it is. That's

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 2>what it is. Any one of them could break out

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 2>and become great. But you have no idea because all

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 2>they've done is had like either brief stretches of greatness

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>were great two years ago, or they're just a high

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 2>draft pick. So we expect them to be great, but

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 2>he can't really say anything else about them. And if

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 2>we keep dwelling, our brains are gonna combust.

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I like Nolan Shanuel, you're on your own.

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Kid.

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be twenty turns twenty three on Valentine's Day.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Let can we make this tier? Let someone be mad

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>about this? Just let someone be mad about it. That's it.

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, almost every fan base should be.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Let someone be mad at this. You're mad about it,

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm mad. Yeah, you're mad about this, and you gotta

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 2>let Andrew Vaughn go. You're hurting.

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bring up Ree Hoskins, right y?

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 2>I think so?

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>All right? How about this? Okay, Reese Hoskins, and Jake

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Berger currently deserve each other.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, drinking buddies, not the name of a tier. They

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>just look like they would be drinking buddies. They both

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 2>work at a construction site.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Reeese one of the nicer guys in baseball. Jake Burger

0:38:56.480 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>has to be. Name's Jake Berger? Who else belongs with them?

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me? Has all of these guys together, and it's like,

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you can reason there's a chance at thirty homers. Are

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we being too harsh on Reees for one year on

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a bad leg?

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm worried about the leg going forward decently, worried about that.

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>The numbers didn't land in an awful spot.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>No, he kind of had like it's a down year

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 2>after a leg injury. He had goldies year offensively, but

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 2>he didn't have anywhere closer to that defensively, which is

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 2>why I'm harding him the numbers. The numbers are pretty similar.

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Like, okay, I'm not even gonna say that sentence because

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that would just blow up the whole thing.

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 2>What's that? No, you gotta say?

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Come on, could Reese have a better year than Wilson?

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think.

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I don't think it's baseball. Anything

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>can happen. Okay, Jose Miranda's on the bottom. You can't

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:15.359
<v Speaker 1>look at him anymore. Had the most hits ever consecutively

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that your cousin made Hamilton great? Yeah, how about that? Yeah,

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it gets overlooked pretty quick. You think my job's cool.

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Cousin Hammy Zach saw it this weekend. Ever, tweeted Zach,

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>who's not on the board currently, Spencer Steer has to

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>go with the pile at the bottom. The four names

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at, well, Spencer Steers out them. The three

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>names I'm looking at are Jake Berger, Rhys Hoskins and

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>both Orioles. But as one man.

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And I have those three and Steer as a tier

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 2>above the young guys.

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You're putting Steer above. Yes, you have some Spencer Steer style.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I do know about.

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that.

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I think Steer is going to get better now that

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 2>he has one position. If you look at his baseball reference,

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 2>each of the last two years, he's played six different positions.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 2>I'll say he was good back to back twenty homer seasons.

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a good player. I think he deserves

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 2>to be above the bottom tier for sure. Who would

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 2>rather have next year Spencer Steer? Paul?

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. Maybe

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the point I don't think, Paul. I don't know.

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I've made you lose love for Paul.

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, kind isn't what I expected. No. I mean there's

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there's something to being a certain level of reliable. I

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think Paul and Carlos should bring for one more summer

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>slash one of them probably won't. We know they can

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>pick it, Yes, Steer, I know there is a guy

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>who like hasn't been good at any position. I kind

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of want to rename that one more summer question mark.

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with them because I think that's what they're

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>looking for, Just one more summer.

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 2>One more summer for old times sake.

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 1>So, babes, you've cleared the board. On that page, every

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>available to us is on the board.

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I have them. Yeah, but now we can.

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Do some So now we have to finagle.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 2>That was my rationale for the BOTTB tier. Let's just

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 2>get him on there and then we'll figure it out.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Top tier is what it is. It's very good baseball players, Okay,

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Pete and Christian Walker. Do they deserve their own tier

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>over Wilson, Contraras, Nathaniel Lowe, Josh Naylor, Grayley? What what

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 1>did we just don't land?

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 2>He absolutely belongs up there.

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I cannot say that. I can't say that with a

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>clean conscious. I cannot Where do you want to put him?

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I'd put him a tear down, make my brain hurt.

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, okay, Jolly, you want to play games.

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 2>He's not mad.

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I've got a.

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>Game, Mariners. Make you mad. I understand this.

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you play a lot of out of the park baseball.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>You're putting together a team I do. Hey, Jolly, you

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>could have and money doesn't matter. Let's say your owner,

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Steve Cohen, would you rather have Luisa Rise or Luke

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Rayley for first base to be your first baseman in

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five.

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm picking Luke Rayley.

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Dude, I don't know.

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Luise Rice cannot play the position.

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Yandi Diaz or Luke Rayley.

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Yandi's a little more interesting because I think Yandi's a

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 2>little better defensively. He's got a little more popp.

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you do? You have Luke Rayley being prime

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>John Olrood at first ball?

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 2>But I'm saying, this is a guy that played corner

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 2>of field well, so I have to imagine he plays

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 2>first base well.

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he shouldn't even be in this conversation.

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I thought he was gonna be in the left

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 2>fight tier.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Why you should be mad at the Mariners rated out

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>poorly at first base last year. That's all I'm saying. Yeah, okay,

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll get over, Luke real, Jake, it's your show. I'm

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 1>getting over.

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Let's move him down. You move him down.

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>He's moved down for now.

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 2>One being bading one. That's right.

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Paid. Pete and Christian Walker be on their own tier.

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the tops.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 2>I think so because they just got paid like it.

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't see any of the well we know for

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 2>a fact controllers didn't get paid like them. He got

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 2>paid less. I don't think Nailor is going to get

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>paid like that, And I don't think Nathaniel lo is

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 2>gonna get paid like that.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Pete and Christian Walker can be game changers for your season.

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker plays the whole year offense and defense. You're

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at thirty homers, five war Pete Alonso. If he

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>has a Pete season, he can put up a forty

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>five homer season. You feel that, yep. I think that

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>separates them from everyone else currently, So I'm okay with that,

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 2>And then like you can even just play the resume

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 2>game too, Like, how many great years do do Pete

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.439
<v Speaker 2>and Walker have compared to the guys below them? Say

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 2>more Contrarest gets unfortunately snake bitten because he's never played

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the position. If he had two years of first base,

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 2>even one year of first base, he'd go in my

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 2>second tier. But he's never played the position.

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I guess it'll be interesting. Bryce Harper. Bryce

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Harper has changed the tone. Yeah, first basily I got

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to see it. First first base became the oh he

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>actually first base isn't easy to play, and Harper's kind

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 1>of been like I figured it out. Let's see what

0:45:54.800 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Willie does. So Wilson Contreri's Nathaniel Lowe, Josh Naylor. I

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>feel okay with that.

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 2>I think I feel okay with that too.

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Costas is a tough one for me. I think he's

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>really good. He's never played what's his most games played.

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 2>In a seasons?

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.839
<v Speaker 2>What was that last year's War?

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how his defense is going to rank out.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I know his foot speed is slow, and trade him.

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know. They were begging the Mariners to

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>take him. It feels like they got Luke.

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Then you're gonna say that I knew the next word.

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And Marrier's outfield is stacked. I have I don't know

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what he's of respect for Luke Raley while being offended

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>by him.

0:46:56.360 --> 0:47:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I have him below this tier now, who Louke Crayley?

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think so?

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I like what contreres can be at first base. I

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm getting from Nathaniel Lowe. I kind of

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm getting from Naylor. Does he need to

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:12.839
<v Speaker 1>go down for you?

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Are we overvaluing him?

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we are at all.

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, Luke Grayley doesn't hit lefties at all.

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Good exposed?

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>What? Okay, how much of a gap should there be

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>between Josh Naylor and Jake Berger?

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Right, now, there's a massive gap between.

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Currently on our tier list. There's a massive gap. Jake

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Berger was real good. I drove by his childhood home.

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Listen, man, I'm just I just make video essays. Okay,

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 2>So I asked me the hard hitting questions.

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Naylor has a leg up on Burger.

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Jake Berger's here last year is not that Good's the

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 2>league average bat and worth worth less than replacement level

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 2>at first base, and he played one hundred and thirty

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 2>seven games. I don't feel that bad about him being

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that low, But I do appreciate your question about me.

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I just I try to talk.

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Things through in one second half. That's what helps me.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a name value thing.

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 2>It exists.

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Cassas, Passquatch, Bush, and Luke Rayley, all lefties, all young,

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>all with a chance to be very really good.

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Is gonna be thirty. I think Raley goes down. Those

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 2>three are such a tier. Really just doesn't. He doesn't fit.

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 2>He's a little bit older, he's not a first baseman.

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 2>He's in a corner outfield.

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't tell you he's going to be

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>better than Lamont Wade.

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:47.399
<v Speaker 2>And he's a platoon player, and maybe he should bat

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 2>lead off. That's the thing for me. Really is a

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 2>platoon player. The other three aren't. They're gonna play every day,

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 2>they're every day first baseman.

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Those he's batted leadoff he has.

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's okay, And you hate the Mariners.

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Mariners. I like that. We kind of have a letter

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 1>egoing here.

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, kind of. It's a long last.

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Leg, okay, Wilson, Nathaniel Naylor, Cassas, Vinnie and Bush.

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 2>That feels much better.

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Something I can come up with something fun there Arise Diaz,

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Wade and now Luke Raley is with them.

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 2>You want to move no.

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Name value is something I'm okay with that tier.

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 2>It hurts to have name values. I think the most

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 2>egregious here because you think of batting titles and you

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 2>think Arias has been like the gun for higher batting

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 2>title guy. But the book is out on him being

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.840
<v Speaker 2>a one tool player. He's a one tool player, and

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 2>that one tool is elite, probably better than anybody else

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 2>in baseball. But he is a one tool player.

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:08.479
<v Speaker 1>It's true. It might be better than anyone else's tool. Right,

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a nice tool that my way gets on base Luke Rayley,

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>what can he do?

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 2>What can't he do?

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>The Olds searching for one more summer Goldie and Sandana. Yeah,

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean this starts. This part starts to get a

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 1>little tricky because, like I'm looking at the tier below

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that Burger. It kind of depends your team's construction. If

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I needed if my offense needed thirty homers, I'd I'd

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>rather have Jake Burger than Goldie at this point. If

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I needed a two way, seven hole hitter, I'd much

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>rather have Paul gold right. Santana has some similar arguments.

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>He crushed lefties last year. He played gold glove defense.

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:56.439
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think I'm Okay with the Olds tier.

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what if I did this before free agency,

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I would I'd much rather have Nathaniel Low for a

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lefty reliever.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Nationals made off like Bennetts and that I feel like

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 2>people won't realize that.

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Just kind of forgot to do anything else this winter,

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>A little scared of this. That Mo the right move. Okay,

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so that's Berger, Hoskins, the Oriel Orioles hybrid human which

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>is a great player, but his two people. If we're

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna knock Luke Rayley's platoon splits, Spencer Steer you love.

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 2>I like him, solid player. I always like the Reds

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:38.879
<v Speaker 2>and Thews on me down.

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what that bottom row Miranda Keith, Shanuel Soderstrom.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I've become a Joonah Bride guy. The numbers are crazy.

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 1>The numbers are kind of nice. Andrew Vaughan, you know

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>how much of that stock I've had totally barely got mentioned.

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.919
<v Speaker 1>And he hit twenty five last year with a two

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:03.919
<v Speaker 1>point two war.

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I met him. He's a massive human being.

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Is he a bottom of the guy.

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 2>We might have to split up the bottom round. That's

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the next conversation.

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem. Pop. I don't know how you do it.

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the difference.

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I am perfectly comfortable leaving everyone.

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I think. Unfortunately, that's the answer. I would just if

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I was a Rockies fan, okay.

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Which you are? Which you are? Mind you.

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Totally. It has some stuff he needs to work on. Yeah,

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. So does everyone in the big strike

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 1>cats right, there are some strikeouts. Oh, batting ages low,

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting homers, which, hey, we like those. But negative

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>war that's cool, Okay, earn your way, earn your way.

0:52:57.120 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>What would you change? At this point, I just I'd

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>rambled up and down the Is there anything you would change?

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You're a tough time I am, I am, I I'll something.

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy I've landed on because at first I was

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at this first baselist, I was like, what the fuck?

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And I still obviously am to a degree. The depth

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at the position is a little impressive. Jose Miranda can

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>be good, Colt Keith can be good. Shanual can be

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>really good. So I've gone through all these names. Horwitz

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>had some nice numbers, and it's getting penciled in to

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be like I like that. There's not a couple of

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>these positions you look at like shortstop, I feel like

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Urcia and a couple of those names. It's like, it

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 1>sucks we have to even talk about there's no upside.

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It's this is what you're gonna get, and that's okay.

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>These guys have serious upside.

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's a bad player. Is that crazy

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:00.439
<v Speaker 1>There's not a player on here that if they were

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on your team you couldn't talk yourself into. Yeah, I

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it'll turn all these players have hope, which that's

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of cool. I mean, Jake Berger could in

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that lineup as things click.

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Like get on yourummy eyes.

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Reese has a okay, Jake Burger just feels let's let's

0:54:23.160 --> 0:54:26.720
<v Speaker 1>rename these s tier. You want the nine figures.

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 2>I have it as nine figure man. Yeah, that was

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 2>just an easy separator from me.

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Like chasing each other's wallets. You get paid, I get paid,

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I get paid. I'm about to get paid.

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 2>I got a new home, old home for my second tarer.

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 2>But we can think of something better.

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking. I think like new money because they

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>both just signed a deal. Yeah, there's a uh something

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about doing free agency right and doing free agency wrong.

0:54:57.200 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Come on, good cop, bad cop?

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh good owner owner.

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That's that's first basement. I want to circle back, right,

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Jolly likes the new home.

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 2>What is it? There's something better there, there's something better.

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll come back to it. My brain hurts, and please

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>make my brain hurt. Well, let's get let's Cassus Vinnie,

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Tristan Vinnie and Michael Bush Pasquentino and Cassas Lefty futures.

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Give me one sixty two something like that.

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's give me one sixty two. Give me

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 2>one sixty two because that was kind of the uniting

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 2>thing with all of them.

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like that one be batting one. That's something.

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>One more summer.

0:55:54.080 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 2>I like that, this one, the second, the last. I'm

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:04.840
<v Speaker 2>out in trouble with. I'd love thirty Homers.

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of good first basemen.

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 2>That's also good.

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some something with thirty homers.

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like, have they all done it? I mean, I'm

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 2>sure the Orioles combined I have done it. But Steer hasn't.

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Steer's been twenty back to back.

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 1>What I need pop to pop? Like none of those

0:56:27.040 --> 0:56:28.680
<v Speaker 1>guys are playing defense.

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, need pop to pop like Hoskins needs pop Like

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:35.799
<v Speaker 2>twenty five homers out of those guys is almost disappointing

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 2>except Steer. Steer's kind of the odd.

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But I like need pop to pop. I me to

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Steer if he did a thirty homer season, we'd be like,

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve might fly up. Yeah, if he can pick it,

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>need pop to pop. That's just a fun word sentence

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, Pat, you're mad about this. I want to

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 1>change that. We've got a lot of youth and potential.

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh potential almost like first base is stacked, Like I

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, potential in both directions. Like if I'm an

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Angels fan, I'm not happy.

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 2>If I'm a fan of anyone on the spots.

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:23.520
<v Speaker 1>They're happy with.

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Bottom tier, but not in a bad way.

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:30.840
<v Speaker 1>No offense.

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:33.880
<v Speaker 2>M now that that would.

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Read no offense. Your bad team should like this guy?

0:57:38.680 --> 0:57:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeh.

0:57:41.600 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean Twins are the only ones that can get

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>loud there. I think Tigers, your MEDA team should like

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this guy. Likes this guy.

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Mid team high upside, which that leaves.

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That Alonso Walker tier is Walker boris no right? Uh oh,

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know Martini sports management. Okay, Martini. I think

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just like something about like a favorite son. Yeah,

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I was, I just went to like the graduating class,

0:58:32.880 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like they just hit free agency together and they got compared.

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Like long lost brothers.

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Brothers, yeah, misplaced brothers.

0:58:47.160 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Two halves of an elite first baseman.

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the glove and the stick, Yeah, the glove and

0:58:56.480 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the stick figure. All right, geez, let us know what

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was horrible. I think if you're a baseball fan, you

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just you just went for the ride with us, and

0:59:08.880 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you understand why.

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a good list.

0:59:12.480 --> 0:59:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good list. I could see

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if I was a fan of the bottom row, I

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 1>would be a little hot to trot the bottom two rows.

0:59:23.400 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Feel like you're happy there.

0:59:26.720 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The depth of this position ended up actually making me

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 1>feel better because I got scared when we were We're

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 1>doing the second second tier of first basement and I'm

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Wilson Contreras. I just I don't know, and

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that comes true for Cardinals fans in baseball. Let

0:59:43.320 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 1>us know where you think we went absolutely wrong. Let

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 1>us know where we went right. Thank you to Jolly Olif,

0:59:48.400 --> 0:59:50.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you to BBD, and thank you to Uncle Dan

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack's a Production, to Patch Productions, John Blie Media and

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Workhouse Media.