WEBVTT - Primetime Previews, NFC Playoff Push & Nick’s Picks Week 14

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jirel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pena, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What's Drive in the Great Episode two eighty three,

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Week fourteen Gambling show pains me that were this deep

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>into the NBA NFL season. It does not pain me

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>demands that we are profitable on the season on this show,

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 2>it has been a long tough slog to profitability. While

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the the TV show picks have been killing. Because I

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>pick my three favorite I do five picks every week

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 2>on this show. I pick my three favorite ones on

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Friday with an extra you know, twenty eight hours of

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>injury news added to it from Thursday morning to Friday afternoon.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 2>So We're sixty one percent against the spread on TV.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>We are right now fifty three point one percent against

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the spread on this show after another four and one week. Demond,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 2>of course, crushed one of the easiest teasers ever. I

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 2>think he covered them both by twenty points or something,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>so we'll discuss that later. Demonse, how are you this morning?

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing pretty good.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 4>How you doing, Pops, I'm doing well.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>We have a special guest on today's show, which means briefly,

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>demands will be bounced, but then he will be back

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to give America his teaser.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 4>But we don't really.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Do guests, and I'm just gonna tell you this now

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>before the person gets here. Uninvited guest, just person just

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 2>announced I want to come on the pod Thursday. I'm

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>inviting myself on. And I was like, not really, how

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 2>we do things around here and America demands, you know,

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the synergy of Demons and I during the gambling segment,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>but I decided, you know, you got to pick your

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 2>battles in this world. So uninvited guest about a half

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>hour from now. But first let's get today today's actual

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>shows or actual topics before we get to the picks.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Here's what missed the cut. Joe Burrow buys the Batmobile

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 2>in NBA Cup Knockout Round set and Spotify raps. I

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 2>just want to drop with a batmobile for a second.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>If the price tag really was demans three million dollars,

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go ahead and say irresponsible purchase by Joe Burrow.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow is a rich man. I don't think he

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 2>is quite rich enough to spend three million dollars responsibly

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>on something that is just like you can't use.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the argument is it's like a piece of art,

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>it's going to appreciate in value, but I don't know

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 2>that I think that is accurate. Joe Burrow right now,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>career earnings through this season one hundred and forty million dollars.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Obviously he's done well for himself. But so your that

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>means two percent of your career earnings a little bit

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>more or on this batmobile. I think it's a little

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>a little pricey. I gotta tell you. I think I

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 2>mean it's that seems like the type of purchase for

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>a billionaire, not a multi hunter, you know, millionaire. But

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'm wrong, and maybe it goes, Maybe he sells

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 2>it for four million, and it's a great investment. You

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>can buy a lot of stuff. And listen, people buy

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 2>art all the time. They just hang it on a wall.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not like it has functional but usually the assumption

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>there is that it's going to, you know, go up

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.119
<v Speaker 2>in value, or you're gonna do some insurance scam.

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Who knows.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Also, why is it not street legal? That's the now.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 2>If it we're street legal, He's like, hey, I'm just

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna be driving this around. Well, I mean, I mean,

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>the guns obviously aren't functional. The rest of it. That

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>thing's got a great turning radius, seems I mean, maybe

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 2>it's too if you get in a wreck, you're gonna

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 2>mess the other person up.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, to Mons, let's get to the actual topics

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 2>of the show, because I have a little rant that

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 2>I need to get to all the top here.

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we had a really fun Cowboys topic here,

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>but we took it out, or I guess you took

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>it out because you have a problem with the seventeen

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 3>playoff format. So could you please explain to us what

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 3>your gripe is with that?

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>So I think the NFL has made a lot of

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>smart decisions over the last decade in making the game

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>more consumer friendly, protecting the quarterbacks, I think is a

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>smart business decision, recognizing it's an entertainment product. There's a

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of smart things they've done. I we are now

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>five years into it, and I'm officially ready to declare

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the playoff expansion was something they didn't need to do

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and they shouldn't have done. And for you know, my

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 2>basically my whole life, the way the NFL playoffs worked

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 2>was six teams per conference buys to the one and

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the two seed go. During the COVID year, they expanded

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 2>it to seven teams per conference just won by and

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 2>I think this year is a great example of why

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 2>that was a mistake. So first, the history of it,

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 2>we have never seen one of those seven seeds that

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>otherwise wouldn't have gotten in go on a playoff run.

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Last year was the first year the seventh seed ever

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>in either conference even won a game. But what the

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>seven seeds have provided us are the following the first

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 2>year of it, we got old man Philip Rivers playing

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 2>for the Colts in the playoffs. They lost to Buffalo,

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and you got I think it was Mitch Trubisky and

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the Bears making the playoffs, they got cracked by New Orleans.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>The next year, the seventh seed was Jail and her

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>It's his first year as a starter, looking wholly unprepared

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 2>against Tom Brady and Tampa Bay. They got blown out,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and then the better than a bye Pittsburgh Steelers and

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Ben Roethlisberger in his farewell tour saying, oh, we're out

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>of here, Twoggs doing high fives to the crowd after

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Week sixteen, thinking their season was over somehow getting into

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs and losing by twenty one to the Chiefs.

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 2>The next year, the seventh seed gave us Skyler Thompson

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Miami Dolphins losing to the Bills and Seattle

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>getting absolutely annihilated by the Niners. Last year, the seventh

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>seed gave us once again, Pittsburgh making the playoffs, this

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 2>time with Mason Rudolph. And then the one good seven

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>seed event we ever had, Green Bay beating Dallas in

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>that game kind of you know, spurred Green Bay to

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>wear So we're one for eight on the seventh seed,

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>providing anything an zero for eight on the seventh seed

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>winning more than one playoff game. But here's the real reason.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't like it this season. In particular, there's no

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>playoff race. If we had the old format demonse in

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the AFC, Chargers eight and four, Ravens eight and five,

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Denver eight and five, one of them is missing the playoffs,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you have super high leverage important. That Ravens Eagles game

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>this past weekend would have been massive for Baltimore. Oh

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 2>my god, we are tied for the final playoff spot. Instead,

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 2>like at Denver, getting that win against the Browns would

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>have felt so huge and then that's just the AFC

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>right now. Instead we look at it and it's like, oh,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 2>we know who the seven playoff teams in the AFC are.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>We don't know the order, but it would take a

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 2>true collapse for Indie or Miami to end up catching Chargers, Ravens, Broncos. Otherwise,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 2>like the Chargers are playing a game this week in

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Sunday Night Football demonse against the Chiefs, that kind of

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>means nothing for them. They're not catching Kansas City for

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.479
<v Speaker 2>the division and they're not falling out of the playoffs.

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 4>If it were.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Six playoff team format, they would feel like, oh my god,

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>if we don't win this game, we are tied for

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the final playoff spot and then go to the NFC.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>The same thing's happening.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>You can say the NFC has real playoff races, but

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the NFC's playoff races are ones that would exist in

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>any format because they're only divisional races. The who's gonna

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 2>win the NFC West, Who's gonna win the NFC South?

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But as far as who's going to be in the

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>playoffs from a wildcard perspective, we know who it is.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Two NFC what North teams and Washington. If we had

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the old playoff format demons, the Packers would be like,

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 2>holy crap, if we win tonight, we might actually somehow

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>be able to win the division. But if we lose tonight,

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 2>we're a game out of missing the playoffs entirely. Washington's

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 2>three games skid from a few weeks ago would have

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>felt crippling, you would. And instead we're just locked into

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>these teams. And so for the NFL and where we

0:10:55.440 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 2>really want to feel like every game has a high level,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 2>real importance. I don't love that if you're a good team,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 2>you really.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Can't miss the playoffs.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, in years past, it was like, man, that was

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>a good team that didn't get into the postseason like

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>it would have been for Green Bay last year.

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Green Bay last year is like, man, they were red hot.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 4>They know this stuff.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, every game matters, and so I just don't love it.

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I also don't love the fact that Kansas City or

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo this year could finish fifteen and two and not

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>get a bye, like the fact that I think the

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs are gonna get the one seed, so it actually

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>is advantageous for Kansas City. But if the Bills, say,

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the Bills lose this week into the Rams and then

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 2>beat the Lions, then take care of Patriots, Jets, Patriots,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 2>they is fourteen and three and their reward is they

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 2>get Lamar Jackson in the Ravens in Round one. Like that,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't love that either. So I just people are

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 2>wondering why we don't have as many huge games as

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 2>it feels like we had in years past late in

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 2>the season, and it's because at least this year, there's

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 2>no playoff races. The only playoff races are divisional races.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 2>We know who the seven AFC playoff teams are. We

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 2>know five well, no, yeah, we know five of the

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 2>seven NFC playoff teams already, and The only ones we

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know are the two division winners, which those races

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>would be going on either way. So that's my little rant.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the NFL has done a lot of really

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>smart things, even things they've been criticized for. This is

0:12:55.840 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 2>one I don't love, and I see the train coming

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>down the tracks of the NFL considering at some point saying, well,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 2>seven's kind of.

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 4>A weird number.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Why don't we just go to eight, have it be

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 2>a true half the league makes the playoffs and remove

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the buys entirely, which I would absolutely hate, And I

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>think that would be legitimately bad for the league because

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 2>then the regular season, there's no incentive to try to

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 2>be great in the regular season. All right, So there's

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>my ten minutes on that. Now we can get to

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the actual stories you guys had and they're oh you

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>uh so, let's just go on to Green Bay and

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Detroit and get to the actual stories.

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So tonight, Jordan Love, they go up against the Lions.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 3>The Lions have obviously been rolling this year, but they've

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 3>got a bunch of injuries sacked up against them right now.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 3>So with all those injuries, if they end up beating

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 3>this feisty Green Bay team. Do you think it will

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 3>start to feel like they're more of a team of

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 3>destiny or this is their year.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, lines have been great and this should be

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 2>demands one of the best Thursday night games ever, not

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>only because it's two excellent teams. But here's the other thing.

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Two excellent teams neither on short rest. We rarely get

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>this where I guess we get it somewhat regularly on

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 2>this exact Thursday, Thursday after Thanksgiving, but they both played

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>on Thanksgiving, so they're both on regular rest for the week,

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>So you're not gonna have as much kind of disjointed

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>football as probably as many injuries as we tend to

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>see on these short week Thursday games. And the upside

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>for the Packers here is just massive. Like we are

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about the Packers all year as Okay, they're

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a good team, but you know they're they're not the

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>clearly the class of the NFC. If they win this game,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>they're a game out of first place in the conference.

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 2>If they win this game, they're a game out of

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 2>first place in their division. Now it'd be hard for

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 2>them to catch Philly because they played Philly in Week

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>one and loss, so they would actually need you know

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, to have a full game past Philadelphia.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>But Packers right now are They're not fraudulent, but they

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 2>have questions. And the reason I say that is they

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 2>have played three games against the three teams in the

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:45.359
<v Speaker 2>conference that have a better record than them Philly, Minnesota, Detroit.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Those are their three losses. So they lose tonight and

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, it's like, all right, you're zero

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to four against the four teams ahead of you, nine

0:15:55.920 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>to oher against everyone else. How seriously can we believe

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 2>that come the playoffs, you're gonna be able to beat

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>all of those teams or at least two of those

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>three teams that have owned you. So there's a huge

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>game for the Packers. It is also a massive game

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for Detroit because Detroit wins tonight give themselves, you know,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 2>keeps Minnesota Bay and puts Green Bay to bed from

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the division and stays the one seed. Detroit loses tonight

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and they could find themselves come Sunday evening in a

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>three way tie for first in the conference, a two

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>way tie for first in the division, and Detroit, which

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking about them, oh Ford Field, never go outside,

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>have the one seed beat, have the buye to where

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>they could be a loss to the Bills a week

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 2>from now away from being the five seed. And what

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you, what you don't want if you're Detroit

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 2>is to be smooth sailing all year long. They have

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 2>played one game outdoors? Right what I'm sorry? No, how

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 2>many games outdoors have they played? I'm gonna pull it up.

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I think up to this point in the season they've

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>played one outdoor game. Yes, that's right, because they're at

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 2>the Packers the only time they've been outdoors, and the

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 2>rest of the way they only have two more outdoor

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 2>games at Chicago and then at the Niners later in

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the year. What you don't want, Demon's a is your

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>smooth sailing all year and then all of a sudden

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>a ten day hiccup. Minnesota stays hot. You're the five seed,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>and your playoff path is okay, no problem. Go to

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Tampa in Week one of the playoffs, go to Philly.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 4>In week you know what I mean?

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Them coming off of bye in week two of the playoffs,

0:17:55.320 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>like you gotta so, there is real stake for Detroit.

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I do think Detroit's an excellent team. There's absolutely no

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>denying they're an excellent team. I do worry about the

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 2>clustering of injuries on defense and if that is going

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 2>to force them into shootouts.

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 4>In the postseason. And I don't listen. We know who the.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Lions want to be. They want to run the ball,

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>have Jared Goff throw, you know, in advantageous down in

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 2>distance positions, and he has been great. There's no denying

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 2>that Jared Goff's been great. But playing with a lead

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 2>indoors versus being in a dog fight outdoors feels like

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 2>very different scenarios for the Lions. So I'm not here.

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm not acting like the Lions are frauds. I'm not

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 2>acting like the Lions aren't one of the four best

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 2>teams in football.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 4>They clearly are. There are clearly.

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Four teams in football that have separated themselves, the Eagles,

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the Lions, the Bills, and the Chiefs, and we can

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>argue about the order of it. I don't buy the

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>idea that the Lions, because of their margin of victory,

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>are head and shoulders better than everybody. I don't buy that.

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I do think that a win tonight puts them in

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 2>a great position to be the one seed in the NFC,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 2>and a loss tonight makes all of a sudden that

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>game next Sunday against Buffalo damn near a must win

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 2>for them. So while the bottom part of the playoff

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 2>race is not all that intriguing, the very top part

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 2>in both conferences Detroit trying to hold off Philly and

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota the Chiefs trying to hold off Buffalo are super intriguing.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, Ah, yeah, so the Chiefs have got

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 3>some real dogs up in the Chargers. So the Chargers

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 3>are eight and four, justin Herbert has been up and

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 3>down throughout the season. But with that said, how much

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 3>are Herbert and the Chargers a threat to your Chiefs?

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I down the road, they could be

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 2>a real threat. They have a great coach, They're building

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 2>the team smartly this year. They are not a threat.

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 2>And I actually really like this matchup for Kansas City.

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how many people watched the Chargers this

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 2>past week, Demonse, you and I were watching together. We

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 2>had a bunch of games on. But they I mean,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 2>how I'm gonna look it up right now.

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 4>They had one.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Hundred and eighty seven total yards of offense against the

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta Falcons. The only reason the Falcons didn't run away

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 2>with that game is Kirk could not stop throwing picks.

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Threw a pick six through a pick in the end zone.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>And Herbert's having a weird year because he has thirteen touchdowns,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 2>which is not great through twelve games, one interception which

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 2>is unbelievable through twelve games, but his yardage is way down.

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 2>He's like two hundred yards per game passing, and this

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>past week was another example of it. Sixteen of twenty three,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 2>one forty seven no touchdowns, like not an overwhelming performance.

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Here is why I like this spot for Kansas City

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>so much. The Chargers as of late seem to have

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 2>one way to move the football. Lad mcconkeye in the slot.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 2>Rookie wide receiver Trent McDuffie, the best slot corner in

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 2>the league who has been forced to play on the

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>outside a lot this year, plays for the Chiefs, and

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I would imagine will just be on Ladd the vast

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 2>majority of the game. You take Ladd McConkie away, I

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 2>don't see how the Chargers score enough points. If you

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 2>remember this last matchup Chargers Chiefs, this is the game

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 2>that early on Mahomes throws that pick that Rashi Rice.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Is this the Rashie Rice game? I think it is?

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Do I have that wrong? I thought Mahomes throws a pick.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 2>You guys can fact check.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>McConkie's not even playing in the game, right, say it again.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 3>McConkie's not even playing. Is he this Sunday?

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Is lad? Is? Why would Laddin McConkie be out? Is

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 4>he out? And I didn't know he's a.

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Little bit that would be participant in practice?

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I just yesterday.

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean he might be playing.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna be. Yeah, well, if he's out,

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>they can't move the ball. But I think he's gonna

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I I thought that. Let me check the charge or

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 2>now I'm throwing a bunch of stuff off, guys, check

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 2>quick for me on if this was the game where

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 2>she Rice got hurt in I thought it was the

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 2>first time they played.

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 4>So lad McConkie. All right.

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 2>So here's a good way to read NFL injury reports.

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 2>If if a guy is limited on Wednesday, usually he'll

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 2>be able to play Sunday. If there are two indicators

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 2>to me. Typically on injury reports, limited Wednesday is a

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>good sign does not practice Friday is a disastrous sign. Now, Listen,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>sometimes guys are limited all week and they don't play.

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But as long as he wasn't a DNP did not

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 2>practice Wednesday, I usually think the guy's gonna play. But

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 2>the point that I was winging for this first matchup,

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes throws that pick, tries to make the tackle. Rashi

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Rice's knee gets blown out when Mahome's trying to blow

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the tackle. The charge get up ten to nothing immediately,

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 2>and the Chiefs reel off seventeen straight points and win

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 2>the game. So the Chiefs are gonna have their new

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>left tackle, DJ Humphries, I would imagine starting in this game. TJ.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Humphries has been a league average left tackle each of

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the last three seasons. His four years ago, he was

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the best in the league, but the last

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 2>three years has been league average. That wouldn't sound like

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 2>such an upgrade except for the fact the Chiefs have

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 2>had literally the worst left tackle situation in football. The

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 2>two guys they have played tackle this year left tackle

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>for them this year. PFF has rated as the seventh

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 2>worst out of seventy three qualifying tackles left or right

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and Jania Morris and Kingsley. There have been one hundred

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and forty tackles play as many snaps as Kingsley. He's

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and twenty seventh, So just getting average tackle

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 2>play opens things up massively for Kansas City. They are

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>on some extra rest having played Friday. This is their

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 2>last like, well, it's not their last extra rest spot,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 2>but after this it's weird. They play Sunday, then they

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>play Saturday, then they play Wednesday, then they play the

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>following Sunday. So I like the Chiefs in this spot.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I like what the Chargers are building, but I do

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>think the Chargers right now are a bit demand's a

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>of a product of their schedule. So their four losses

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 2>have come against the four of the five playoff adjacent

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>teams or playoff teams they've played, Steelers, Chiefs, Cardinals, Ravens.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Their best win of the year is against the Broncos

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 2>early in bo Nix's career. Their other wins have come

0:25:51.640 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 2>against the following teams Raiders, Panthers, Saints, Browns, Titans, Falcons,

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 2>So they have they have proven their ability to beat

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the bad teams and they're yet to prove anything against

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the good teams. I'm not saying this is going to

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 2>be a blowout because the Chiefs don't play those style

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>of games. But I like the Chiefs a lot.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the Chargers of the Packers of the

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of the AFC in a way.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean kind of, except the Packers have the

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Backers do have. They have a lot of law. They

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 2>have three losses against the best teams they've played, but

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 2>they've also beaten the Rams. They annihilated the Cardinals. Uh,

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 2>they beat the Texans, so those you.

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Know, the Cowboys have been before this year like last year.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good example. It beat up the bad teams,

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 2>lose to the good teams.

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a good comp all right. Uh, rap

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>sheets said, it's up in the air. If McConkie plays.

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>If McConkie doesn't play, the Chargers are cooked.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 4>But even if he does.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Play, I just think you put Trent McDuffie on him

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and erase him. All right, let's go to the last

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 2>topic here.

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 3>So the moment, Seattle and Atlanta lead their divisions, and

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals are the second in the West, and the tiers

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 3>you have the Rams and Bucks had all those teams though,

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 3>So since I'm not gonna be doing the gambling show today,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I want to go ahead and get this in. Let's

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 3>get it. So would you parlay LA and Tampa Bay

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 3>to win their divisions at seven to twenty plus seven twenty?

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I would. I do think that's what's gonna happen.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams are gonna run down the Seahawks.

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 4>And I know earlier in the year I said.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Niners Cardinals could be the Sunday Night Football Week eighteen.

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Game winning you're in.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I now amend that, so I think it might be

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Rams Seahawks Sunday Night Football Week eighteen game winning You're in.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So I think that ten wins can take that division.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>And listen, the Rams schedule the rest of the way

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 2>is not easy, but after this week you get a

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>bit of a respit. They are home for the Bills,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 2>then at the Niners, at the Jets, home for the Cardinals,

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 2>home for the Seahawks, and the Rams can go four

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to one in that stretch the they have. To my eye,

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 2>they've only had one really bad game the last six

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 2>weeks of seven weeks, and that was the Dolphins game.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I know they got cracked by the Eagles with Eagles

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>are an excellent team, and as far as Tampa goes,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Tampa's schedule is as good as it gets. As far

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 2>as going on a run home for the Raiders, at

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers tough, then at the Cowboys home for the

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>pay Anther's home for the Saints. We all know Atlanta's

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>going in the wrong direction now, Tampa, because they're zero

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>to two against Atlanta, has to finish with a better

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 2>record than them, but I think they will. So at

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 2>plus seven twenty tamp in the Rams to win their divisions. Yeah,

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and mark me down for that because I

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 2>like that a lot right now, getting seven to one

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 2>when I think that is what's gonna happen. All right,

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 2>So here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna take a

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 2>quick break, come back. We have a special guest for

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>the Gambling Show demands then will be back in to

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>do his teaser and to discuss the offer and things

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 4>But very quick break.

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Right back as the red Hot Gambling Show eight and two,

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the last two weeks two and zero and teasers just crushing.

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Do that next, What's Right?

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What's Right with Nick Right? Episode two eighty

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 2>three and let's just be honest, an uninvited guest. Yeah,

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, here is the full list of guests. If

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 2>people are listening, by the way, and not watching, it's

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Danny Parkins from Breakfast Ball. Full list of guests in

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>What's Right History that are not blood relatives or or

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, through marriage relatives of mine, Lil Wayne once,

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>that's right, Danny Parkins and Andrew Philippony also uninvited once

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and now Danny Parkins again uninvited for a second time.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we may as well be family.

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I mean correct you are. You know, it's

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 2>funny you say that, Oh, this is is a much

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>like I tell the producers live on the air when

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna take shows off, I'll tell you something live

0:30:58.560 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 2>on the air.

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Right now, you said, might as well be family.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I had to do some like a state planning life insurance,

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 2>like the if something were to happen to me, what

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 2>happens or whatever. Yeah, and I put you down as

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>like you're the executor, just so you know.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I don't get I don't get a percentage.

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, so here's a funny thing about that. You So

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 2>we actually had to determine can you pay yourself hourly

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 2>or is it a flat rate because the executor is

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 2>entitled to if you don't do that, a percentage of

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 2>what obviously will be a massive estate.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>But here is the part of it that is I

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>think going to either annoy you or make you.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Laugh, probably both.

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Are the second in command executor. You are the executor.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 2>If something happens to the initial executor, who do you

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 2>think the executor would be in this circumstance?

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 4>The person? Is it Deanna if she's over eighteen.

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Can't be any of the kids. It can't be anything

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>like that. I'm just gonna tell you right now. It's

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Nicole that annoys Danielle, annoys Danielle's best friend. Wait a minute, Nicole,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>who goes on all our trips with us and Danny's

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 2>yet to be invited on one of these trips, is

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>actually the executor. You are the the.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 4>So if something happens to you and Nicole, yeah, then

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 4>you're in well so here you're in sneaky Yeah, like

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 4>spin zone for me. If something happens to you, there's

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 4>a decent chance it also happens to Nicole, because she'll

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 4>she'll be with Yeah, exactly, right, that's exactly right.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 2>But so Danny's here in part because sports media, the

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 2>sports media world has refused to give Danny Parkins his

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>flowers for what is objectively year over year, by the way,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 2>red hot gambling picks. So last season, let's just go

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 2>to last year doing radio on the score in Chicago.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 4>I started fifteen and oh, he started documented on the

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 4>air fifteen and oh against the spread. Yeah, it got

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 4>no coverage. It got no coverage, And it was partly

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 4>my fault because when I made our social media team

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 4>like string the five week thing together to show it

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 4>to go fifteen and oh, I picked three games a

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 4>week against the spread, I promptly went oh to six

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 4>the over, and over the next two weeks when I

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 4>like tried to get a bunch of coverage for it,

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 4>still still finished at like sixty one percent for this.

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 2>So sixty one percent last year, which is exactly where

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>my TV picks are this year. So a little more

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 2>background here. Every year I'd been on TV, we were

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:57.239
<v Speaker 2>profitable against the spread until last year. Last year we

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 2>had our first losing record. This year we're back at

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>sixty one percent, which again, the people who listen who

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 2>bet understand this. Anything above fifty two and a half

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 2>percent against the spread is great, you're making money. Anything

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 2>above fifty seven percent, you're among the best in the country.

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Anything above sixty percent is unprecedented the wrong word, but

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 2>it is historically impossible to sustain every year. No one's

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 2>ever done that in the NFL. Danny, what are you this.

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Season twenty seven and fifteen against the spread, which.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Is sixty seven sixty eight percent?

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 4>You bet you're better at mane, I mean twenty seven

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 4>forty two.

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so sixty I'm gonna say sixty Producers say my

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 2>ear what it is.

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go with.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Sixty seven point three percent is what it is, right,

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 2>But regardless, twenty seven over forty two is only sixty

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 2>four percent.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 4>Oh wow, I wish Oh yeah, of course, yeah, because.

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Twenty eight over twenty eight and fourteen would have been sixty.

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Six point seven. That's right. I did it the other way.

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 4>I gave you sixty nine and fourteen. Regardless, it's great,

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>So you wanted to come on here? Are we gonna

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 2>get your picks? Before TV?

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 4>Like? How are you doing?

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 4>It's your show and I invited myself on. So if

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 4>you want me to give you some picks. I will

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 4>I did not give this one on TV Today. Parkins

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 4>picks nine thirty Fridays on Breakfast Ball. Got a very

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 4>special thing planned for the picks tomorrow, so I don't

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 4>want to give all of them away, but I will

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 4>say this. I didn't make it an official pick on

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 4>the air, but I have bet it Green Bay tonight,

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>so that I like Green Bay Tonight a lot.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 2>So we're gonna discuss that in just a moment. Okay, First,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>let me just quickly for the audience recap last week,

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 2>because on this show we do five last week, four

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 2>and one a one horrible miss, the others pretty care free.

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we can put up the graphic

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 2>or not. If not, I'll just tell it to you.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Chicago getting nine and a half against Detroit. That wasn't

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 2>care free in the first half. It ended up being carefree.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh getting three against Cincinnati. They went out right the

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Chargers minus won against the Falcons that actually, to be honest,

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 2>was probably the worst pick of them all. The Chargers

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>had no business winning that game, but Kirk Cousins was

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 2>just dead set on the Falcons losing that game. The

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Rams minus two and a half against New Orleans. I

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 2>gotta tell you, I don't remember any part of that

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 2>football game, but I know it covered. And then Tennessee

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 2>plus six against Washington. They were promptly down twenty eight

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to nothing, and that pick was dead. But four and

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 2>one on the year gets us on this show thirty

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 2>four to thirty and one overall. All right, my first

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 2>pick of the week is green Bay getting three and

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a half of Detroit.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we did not talk about this ahead of time,

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:55.240
<v Speaker 4>so go ahead.

0:36:55.480 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 2>My rationale is multi layered. One is I said this earlier.

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:02.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you guys talked on the show

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 2>this morning. This should be one of the best Thursday

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 2>night games ever because not only is it two excellent

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 2>teams with real stakes, both on full rest. Usually Thursday

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 2>night games, you know, teams are more banged up than usual,

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 2>or get more banged up. With that said, the previous Thursday,

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Detroit got all banged up, and I think the cluster

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of injuries along the defensive line. I also think Green

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Bay understands kind of a rubber meets the road moment.

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 2>They are zero to three against the three teams ahead

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>of them in the Conference, Minnesota, Philly and Detroit. This

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 2>is you know, they'll get one more shot against Minnesota

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 2>and obviously this shot against Detroit. If they win tonight, Danny,

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 2>they are definitively alive for the division. I don't think

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 2>it's likely, but if they win the Detroit and Minnesota

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 2>at two losses, they'll be at three and they have

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 2>would have split with Detroit. They have Minnesota again later

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 2>in the year. I think that Detroit has looked shakier

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the last few weeks. I still think they're an excellent team,

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 2>but it's hard to win ten in a row. It's

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>hard to win eleven in a row in this league.

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I certainly like getting three and the hook. So we're

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 2>on the same page of this game. You go ahead

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 2>on your rationale on it.

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 4>So first of all, when they played in Week nine,

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 4>the game was a lot closer than the score indicated.

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Green Bay had over four hundred yards of offense. Detroit

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 4>had less than three.

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the other thing people don't know about. Danny

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't love things about the NFL. Danny doesn't trust.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Your record or or I watch the games.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Even within a game, who won or lost, who had

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 2>more yards per play.

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I've seen the NFL very clearly. I watched the games,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 4>and that was a game. It was a game in

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the rain. Weird things happened. Jordan Love threw a terrible

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:07.479
<v Speaker 4>pick six, and you'd say, well, Jordan Love throws interceptions. Fine,

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 4>that was a gift wrapped pick six to Detroit. Could

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 4>not have made it any easier for him. Then wis

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 4>wide open in the end zone, nine yard pass, puts

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 4>it right on his hands, he drops it, fourth and one.

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 4>They then go for it instead of kicking a field

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 4>goal because they had been down by multiple scores, end

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 4>up coming out of that possession with zero points. I

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 4>thought that Green Bay absolutely not, maybe not could have

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 4>won the game, but should have played that game a

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 4>lot closer than they did.

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 2>If people don't remember the game. Just to be clear,

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad Danny didn't say they could have won down

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to three, I know, with a minute left

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 2>in the third, but I actually understand. And the pick

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 2>six before the half. The game was seven to three

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 2>with a minute left in the first half. Correct Detroit

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 2>field goal, then pick six at seventeen to three, off

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>to the race.

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.760
<v Speaker 4>It escalated and also out of that game. The Packers

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 4>have leaned in more to Josh Jacobs. He's second in

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 4>the NFL in touches since that game, only behind Saquon Barkley.

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 4>He's got five touchdowns in the last three games since then.

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Love has no turnovers in the last two games.

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 4>And you mentioned Detroit's injuries they now have. I believe

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 4>it's thirteen defensive players on IR and just from the

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 4>game against the Bears last week, two more defensive linemen

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 4>out not on IR, but they've been ruled out for

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 4>tonight's game, so it's just Detroit. I look at this

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 4>as kind of like a San Francisco thing. I think

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 4>that they've just reached a breaking point with their defense.

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 4>It'll be in a dome. Their offense is amazing. They're

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 4>gonna score a lot of points. This will be way more.

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 4>I think there'll be way more points to the night

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 4>than twenty four to fourteen. But you give me three

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 4>in the hook and how green Bay has relied on

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 4>the running game and what Detroit now doesn't have in

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 4>their front seven, I think the matchup absolutely gives this

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 4>one to green Bay.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So I agree with the vast majority that I also

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 2>like green Bay was a little distracted by what are

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:01.919
<v Speaker 2>you doing with your thumbs and your shirt?

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I gotta I thought it was.

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 2>I gotta tell you. At first, I was like, wait,

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 2>because some shirts have a little like situation. Yeah, but

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that's not what the shirt's made for.

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 4>I just saw it.

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I saw I was gonna wear that jacket.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 4>I didn't want to. I didn't want to match it.

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give you you what are your first weeks

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 2>on the air. You gave a pick. I don't remember

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 2>what it was. And Craig said something super funny that

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>made me smile, where he's.

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 4>Like, you love these grimy games? Oh yeah?

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>And that you where you are better than me is

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I'm like, man, I have a feel in this game,

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 2>but I don't want to watch a second of it.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 2>So I don't want to bet it because I don't

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 2>want to be invested in this game checks those boxes.

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's a local game, so I'll have no choice

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 2>but to have it on one of the TVs, so

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind. I love the Giants getting four and

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.760
<v Speaker 2>a half at home against New Orleans.

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 4>So go ahead.

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 2>The Saints without Taysom Hill can't move the football.

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 4>What what are you laughing about? You were like the

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 4>biggest anti Taysom Hill guy in the world, and now

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 4>he's like a oh no, no, go ahead.

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I much like many of my seemingly controversial opinions, upon

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 2>a level deeper inspection, realize, oh, not only was that

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:38.439
<v Speaker 2>not controversial, it was one hundred percent correct. Taysom Hill

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 2>as a gadget guy is awesome. Taysom Hill.

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 4>When Sean Payton was.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Like, he is our next quarterback and we're gonna pay

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 2>him eighteen million dollars a year was an absurdity. But

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 2>for the Saints this year weren't using him like that.

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 2>They were using him as a running back, widers, h back,

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>tight end his destiny and by the way, his career

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 2>might be over. He's yeah, it's he's thirty five coming out.

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 2>He's older than people think.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 4>What quarterback are you comfortable betting on here in this game?

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't even know who's playing for the Giants.

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I assume it's thru Lot, but I don't care.

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting four and a half points. Derek Carr has

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 2>played sixteen games in his career as a road favorite.

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 2>What do you think his record against the spread.

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 4>Is oh, it'sday sixteen games three and thirteen, one, fourteen

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 4>and one. Wow.

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 2>The only win was indoor back indoors in a dome.

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 2>This game's obviously in New York in December. Derek Carrs

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 2>thirty six percent against spread is a favorite for his career.

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 2>That's the worst of any quarterback the last twenty years.

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Uh, and I.

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 2>The Giants arenw the Giants have. I know you don't

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 2>like the trend stuff. I like, no, but you care

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 2>about like when it's tell me if I'm wrong. I

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 2>don't want to put words in your mouth. You really

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:14.959
<v Speaker 2>don't like trends when it's like this team on this day.

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, well that's complete nonsense, or even like this

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>team versus this team for the last twenty years. Also,

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 2>but when it's specific to a player Carr, I think

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 2>that is somewhat instructive.

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 4>I agree. You know, I'm interested in like the Dolphins

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.800
<v Speaker 4>and the cold type of trends. I'm interested in Josh

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Allen against the Dolphins. Yeah. Sure.

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 2>The Giants not only have lost their last seven games,

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 2>they have not covered their last seven. The reason I'm

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 2>saying that when I'm betting the Giants is I feel

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 2>like they are at some point like they're gonna get

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 2>extra points half point every week the market correct, market

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 2>over correction. So I just think the Giants, Honest to God,

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.439
<v Speaker 2>when I was doing my own little in my head

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 2>guess the lines on this love it, I thought this

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 2>would be the Giants minus one.

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh wow, Okay.

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the Saints in this spot with no tastem

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 2>outdoors in New York are like the Saints should not

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 2>be a four and a half point road favored over anybody.

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 4>No, that that's totally fair. I this game is very,

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 4>very grimy. I the Giants have some quid in them

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 4>though they've they've had some quid in them.

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 2>They've dealt with their own injuries, That's what I'm saying.

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 4>So like they are to me, they are just blowout

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 4>potential every week, like if they if they get down

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 4>ten early, we were positive. This team's not just folding

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 4>up and going home and get and getting out of there.

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 4>So they to me there that's why it's scary to

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 4>love them in any spot. So that's fair.

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:57.439
<v Speaker 2>I just think getting four and a half I got

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 2>you right now. I the is a spot. I like

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 2>what I so I'm gonna I'm gonna go through my

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 2>five and see if we have any overlapper object you know,

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 2>or counter, and then we can get into more of yours. Okay,

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 2>all right, this is.

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 4>A Grimyer game.

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there's one game on the slate, and I'm eating

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the points. I'm laying three and a half points with

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Will Levis and the Tennessee Titans.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 4>You're going back to the well with Tennessee. Right, you

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 4>had last week was undeterred.

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 2>They are at home against a mac Jones led Jackson.

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:41.439
<v Speaker 4>This is an anti mac Jones agenda for you, one

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 4>thousand percent. Okay, he looked, Okay, last week he did

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 4>he look.

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 2>So here's so I have a controversial theory.

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Andy Reid off of Bye, Yeah, unbelievable. Right, yeah, of

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 4>course that's a trying I put wad into. Of course,

0:46:58.880 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 4>great coach.

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 2>More time, the worse you are, the better you are.

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 4>We all agree.

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The more time you have to prepare the better.

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 4>The worse you are the last time you have to

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 4>prepare the better. Right, So mac Jones didn't even think

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 4>it was playing.

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Anybody gets thrown in the game, sure, and all of

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 2>a sudden he's okay, all week. Mac Jones is like,

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 2>this is gonna be my this is my last chance

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 2>to prove I can be a starting quarterback. Yeah, game

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 2>playing tailored for me. I'm playing the Titans. He's gonna

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 2>be horrible, just horrible.

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 4>And so you bet your own narratives a little bit

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 4>more than I do.

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 2>He's five and seventeen against the spread as an underdog

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 2>in his career, getting points five and seventeen against the spread.

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I I think the Jags talk about it, that's gonna

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 2>have given up. The Titans had shown prior to that

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Washington game. They had shown some fight lately, and even

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 2>in that Washington game, down twenty eight nothing, all of

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 2>a sudden it was like, oh they they didn't roll over.

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 2>It ended up forty two to nineteen. What did they

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 2>get it to? At one point they got it to

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight to thirteen, So, I mean, not a huge thing,

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 2>but they but they didn't just flat out quit. I

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 2>ain't that Obviously, Levis is trying to prove who he is.

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 2>The coach is trying to prove who he is. Everyone

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in Jacksonville knows it's over right.

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 4>You should not be quitting on a new coach in

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 4>year one in Tennessee. That that I completely agree with.

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:44.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm just gonna ask you this, if we were gonna

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 4>do a montage of the ten worst plays in the

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 4>NFL this year, how many of them do you think

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 4>are populated by will Levis Sorrey? Okay, all right, there's

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 4>no doubt about it.

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh, he hasn't had as many lately, a lot early,

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that's true. And I don't like Levis, and they certainly

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 2>don't like laying three and a half. But I how

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.800
<v Speaker 2>many more opportunities in our life are we going to

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 2>have a chance to bet against mac Jones and we're

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 2>laying less than a touchdown?

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Not many? No, it's gonna be the last one. Yeah,

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna be the last one.

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, Now to two great games after those grimmy games.

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:24.839
<v Speaker 4>Okay, here we go.

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams are gonna beat the Bills. I

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 2>certainly liked them getting four and a half. This is

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>such a massive spot for the Rams. Remember the last

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 2>time they played Buffalo, they were the defending Super Bowl champions.

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 4>It was Week one and.

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo annihilated them in that game to kind of announce

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 2>themselves that season.

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 4>That was the Bills.

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 2>The first game after the thirteen seconds game. Yeah, and

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 2>it was the The Rams defense is better than people

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 2>think it is. That Jared Versu has been awesome. That

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 2>was one of my best preseason picks was Jared Verse

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 2>for Defensive Player of the Year.

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 4>This feels to me like a twenty seven.

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:17.240
<v Speaker 2>To twenty four game in either direction. So I'm getting

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 2>four and a half points for a Rams team. They

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 2>don't have to have it, but if they lose it,

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 2>they do have to run the table. Like so the

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Rams got five games left, They've got to go four

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 2>and one if they're gonna win that division. Buffalo needs

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 2>this game for one seed reasons. Yeah, doesn't need it

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:42.439
<v Speaker 2>at all for any other reason. And Buffalo also has

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Detroit the following week. So there's a bunch of factors

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 2>where I would just be surprised if the Bills, pardon me,

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 2>blow out the Rams.

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:54.839
<v Speaker 4>I liked.

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams can win out right. I certainly

0:50:57.680 --> 0:50:59.320
<v Speaker 2>love them getting a full four and a half.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 4>I did not lay the points in this spot. You know,

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 4>I think Josh Allen is the second best player in football,

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 4>and I picked him for MVP before the year. Did

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 4>you have versus defensive Rookie of the year Defensive Player

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 4>of the Year. Did I say said player, Yeah, no,

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Rookie of the Year. I thought he's not going to

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 4>win defensive player. I was curious because there weren't that

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 4>many high defensive draft picks for rookie, so he was

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.799
<v Speaker 4>one of the favorites. But yeah, he does look like

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 4>he's got star potential. Uh for the Rams. You guys

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 4>see what he did.

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to just kind of throw a little water

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 2>on my defensive Rookie the Year. It wasn't You don't

0:51:34.960 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 2>have to be a high draft pick to win Defensive

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Rookie of the Year.

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Wasn't a second. I think he was the second year,

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 4>like one of my best picks. He was like the

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 4>second favorite.

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I think he was probably like plus six hundred. I

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 2>think that's like a good bet. I think, you know what,

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I think his.

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 4>Second favorite someone. I think six to one is a

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 4>is a good winning bet. Congratulations and all your success.

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 4>I think the Rams are good. I think Buffalo is

0:51:57.000 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 4>potentially great, and I don't buy at all game or

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 4>letdown spot because I do think they're playing for the

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 4>one seed and if they lose, Pittsburgh could jump them

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:09.879
<v Speaker 4>for the two seed. I do think they would want

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 4>to avoid Baltimore, who blew them out earlier in the season, Buffalo, How.

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean avoid Baltimore though in the playoffs?

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 4>For see, I guess I don't.

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:26.360
<v Speaker 2>So here's so because there's not buy for this two seedy.

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's a huge difference between the two

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 2>and the three. And I would agree with you if

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 2>we knew, oh, this dog team is going to be

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the seventh seed, you might get Baltimore if you're the two.

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Or the three. Yeah, for sure.

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like we have no way of Chargers, Ravens,

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Broncos five six seven six five, Like we have no idea,

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 2>but go ahead.

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 4>How do you feel about the idea of like they're

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 4>gonna play for Josh Allen to be MVP, and a

0:52:57.760 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 4>big piece of that is if they get to fourteen

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 4>three or thirteen and four, that is massively significant for

0:53:04.200 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 4>him to win MVPA. Oh I listen, I just don't

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:08.840
<v Speaker 4>expect letdown spots from this team.

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I so I don't necessarily expect letdown spots.

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 4>Because I've seen that this week that like they were

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 4>it was the snow it was National TV against the

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:22.319
<v Speaker 4>Niners and the next week is their game against the Lions,

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:25.320
<v Speaker 4>which could be a Super Bowl preview flying across the country.

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I just don't think that when you put the film

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 4>on and you see Matt Stafford, No, you letdown.

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 2>It's not so much a letdown spot as much as

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to play excellent every week.

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know what I like.

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 2>And the Bills have what They've won seven straight that

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:44.959
<v Speaker 2>they play. They won their biggest game of the season.

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:45.399
<v Speaker 4>Two weeks ago.

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they looked awesome and they you know, they are

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the toast of the NFL town this week.

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 4>You love fading teams that become the toast of the

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:56.800
<v Speaker 4>NFL whenever that team is not the Chiefs.

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, but by the way, the Chiefs don't cover when

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 2>they're No.

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:02.880
<v Speaker 4>I get it. I think I'm saying. I think it's informed.

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I I just think that too often

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 2>little Chiefs conversation for a moment. And this is the penalty,

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:17.480
<v Speaker 2>if you will, of being the dynasty. The Chiefs are

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 2>discussed under the context of their worst or their potential issues.

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Every other team competing with them to be the best

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 2>is only discussed under the context of their what they

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:33.399
<v Speaker 2>do well.

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 4>This was the thing with Baltimore.

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore finally lost enough games people were like, Okay, maybe

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 2>they're not a juggernaut. The Lions, there wasn't a mumbling

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 2>word spent this week about they really almost blew that

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Bears game, Like nobody has been like what happened to

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:52.839
<v Speaker 2>the Lions.

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:54.640
<v Speaker 4>In the second half of that game. It took such

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 4>a catastrophic collapse by the.

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Other team that they had to fire their car oh

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 2>midseason for the first time ever. Yeah, and if that

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 2>were the Chiefs in that spot, the narrative would have been,

0:55:08.680 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 2>if Eberflus knows what he's doing, the Chiefs lose as

0:55:12.040 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 2>opposed to kick a field goal to force overtime. So

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:18.359
<v Speaker 2>that's the So the Bills. The Bills are the team

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to beat the Chiefs. They are also the team that

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 2>needed a sixty one yard field goal to beat the

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins a few weeks ago, you know what I mean,

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Like they are all So I just think I think

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 2>that if I were giving Madden ratings to teams, I

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:41.320
<v Speaker 2>think that Buffalo is a ninety one and the Rams

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 2>are in eighty four. And when you then incorporate the

0:55:45.680 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 2>fact that this game is in Los Angeles, it means

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:53.560
<v Speaker 2>certainly more to the Rams, even it means something for Buffalo,

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and I'm getting four and a half points. I just

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 2>like the Rams.

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 4>So we have not been against each other yet, and

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 4>you haven't hit on a game that I think I'm

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 4>picking on the TV show tomorrow yet, So I'm kind

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 4>of just kind of playing the little Devil's advocate for

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 4>you on your picks here.

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, So this one, I'm I'm certain we're not

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:10.839
<v Speaker 2>going to be on the same side of I think

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a chance we're Apoh, it has been a long

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:20.439
<v Speaker 2>time since I bet the Chiefs. They are laying three

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:24.400
<v Speaker 2>and a half. Yeah, against the guy Danny Parkins believes

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 2>is the third best player in the league.

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:29.839
<v Speaker 4>That's right. It was a rough game last week though,

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 4>for that opinion, But go ahead.

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 2>It's been a rough season for that opinion. It's been

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 2>a rough season for the Justin Herberts the most. I mean,

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:40.359
<v Speaker 2>he's got a great offensive line, a great coach. I mean,

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 2>he's averaging one touchdown in two hundred yards a game.

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 4>They're focused on the running gameme, they're establishing a culture

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 4>more than stats. They're winning more than last year. He's

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 4>the only player in the NFL through eleven weeks to

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:52.279
<v Speaker 4>have a passer rating over ninety in every game.

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, So okay, so what's there. What's their yards

0:56:57.000 --> 0:56:59.239
<v Speaker 2>per play look like? With the Chargers, Well.

0:56:59.120 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 4>They're focusing on grimy runs. I'm worried that Harbaugh is

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 4>gonna just be too much. Him and Greg Roman are

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 4>gonna take the ball out of Herbert's hands. It just

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:08.320
<v Speaker 4>focus on wins and stats for my guys. So my

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:10.399
<v Speaker 4>guy's gonna win a little bit, then he'll get back

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 4>to the staff. So whatever, I want to be the

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 4>guy who inducts him into Canton and justin.

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Herbert this year is eighteenth in the NFL and pass

0:57:18.720 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 2>attempts right, and eighteenth in passing yards.

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 4>That's not his.

0:57:23.240 --> 0:57:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Coach, No, no, no, no.

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 4>What I'm saying is he is.

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 2>He is doing. He is has exactly as many yards

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 2>as you would think he would have with that many

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 2>pass attempts. That doesn't scream to me other worldly talent.

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:40.080
<v Speaker 2>But here's the listen, did you watch games with your

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:40.600
<v Speaker 2>eyes closed?

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 4>But he tell you the guy is an other worldly

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:43.440
<v Speaker 4>physical talent. He just is.

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 2>So here's the question I have for you and for

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 2>other people, how deep into your NFL career. Does your

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 2>NFL career outweigh your combined profile?

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 4>This isn't a combine thing. If every quarterback in the

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 4>NFL was a free agent and there was a draft

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 4>tomorrow of the GMS, what pick in the draft do

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 4>you think Justin Herbert is.

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Probably seventh or eighth?

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and I think he's probably fourth or fifth.

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, no, you always I would take

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 2>him third.

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I would, I would take him third, But I think

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 4>that the league would take him fourth or fifth. And

0:58:24.080 --> 0:58:25.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm just curious.

0:58:25.680 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 2>The argument for Justin Herbert over Joe Burrow is Lamar Jackson. Now, oh, well, I.

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Don't think that Lamar Jackson wants that difficult Okay, well

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 4>tell me. I don't think that Lamar like Lamar Jackson.

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 4>So much of what he does and what makes him

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 4>special is the mobility and the athleticism, which will be

0:58:46.200 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 4>a declining, depreciating skill set over the course of his career.

0:58:50.640 --> 0:58:52.640
<v Speaker 4>And so I believe that even though we are witnessing

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 4>yet again another MVP caliber season, even though he will

0:58:55.720 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 4>not win it from Lamar Jackson, and he helps the

0:58:58.200 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 4>running game in a tremendous way, and Lamar Jackson is amazing.

0:59:01.720 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 4>I do think that, Like, if I was going to

0:59:03.560 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 4>bet on a guy's thirties, and now we see quarterbacks

0:59:06.440 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 4>play into their late thirties or forties with a high

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:11.040
<v Speaker 4>degree of regularity. If I was going to bet on

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:13.680
<v Speaker 4>who is going to have the better thirties, Lamar Jackson

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 4>or Justin Herbert, I would bet heavily on Justin Herbert.

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 2>So the you you talked to, the things Lamar does great.

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Just remind me the thing just.

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 4>Throws the ball, but so like and the the spiral,

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:31.360
<v Speaker 4>the arm talent where he puts the ball. Okay, man,

0:59:31.440 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 4>this is situation.

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I've got one more thing that I.

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 4>The Burrow argument is is tough to make because it

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 4>can't be made better. Absolutely, if you gave me one

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 4>head coach for Herbert's entire career, and you gave me

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Herbert and Jamar Chase and T Higgins, I would love

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 4>to see what type of offensive success and Justin Herbert

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 4>would have I do it. Became more physically talented than

0:59:57.200 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Joe Burrow, but Burrow has wanted a higher level with

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 4>a better He's more.

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Accurate, and he has better numbers than all these better players.

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 4>So the better players. Thing. I listened to you.

1:00:10.440 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Prior to this season multiple times, pick the Chargers to

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 2>win or make the Super Bowl.

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 3>And.

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:22.440
<v Speaker 2>You obviously thought they had good rosters. Here's the question

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I would have, and I don't know the answer to this.

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And then Bosa gets hurt, and then James gets hurt. Yes,

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>injuries happened in the NFL. Here's the question I would have,

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and I don't have the answer to this. I'm gonna

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>look it up today. Do you think the Chargers are

1:00:38.440 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna win a playoff game this year? Probably not?

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Probably not, probably not.

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I just want to know who the all time legendary

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>quarterback is other than Matthew Stafford, who went the first

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>five seasons of his career without a playoff win.

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 4>I think Peyton man No, he won one.

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>The Peyton. Uh so Peyton. Let me pull it up,

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the Peyton Manning.

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Because he because he didn't go to the AFC Championship

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 4>game until year six. So Peyton came in because I'll

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:18.120
<v Speaker 4>pull it up right now. Yeah, take Peyton Manning.

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Won two playoff games in he came in the league

1:01:23.640 --> 1:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>in ninety eight, No. Three, ninety eight, ninety nine, two

1:01:25.720 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>thousand and one to two Okay, so next year will

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>be your Yeah, next year Manning, Peyton Manning, and year six,

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 2>thank you, had a playoff game where he had a

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>perfect passer rating, five touchdowns, three hundred and seventy seven yard.

1:01:39.680 --> 1:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Then the no punt game against the Chiefs was that game?

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 2>And then and then they lost in the AFC Championship game.

1:01:46.600 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I said Stafford. Stafford did win a playoff game with Detroit,

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>so I want to make sure I didn't short change

1:01:53.200 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>stat Oh no, he didn't. He went to the playoffs

1:01:55.200 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>three times with Detroit, never won a playoff game. So

1:01:57.120 --> 1:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Stafford be the guy. And again I don't dislike Herbert

1:01:59.840 --> 1:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>now sounds like no.

1:02:01.320 --> 1:02:02.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that.

1:02:04.040 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Some accountability needs to fall on him. And he has

1:02:08.080 --> 1:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>not played at the level you thought he was going

1:02:11.520 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 2>to play at this year.

1:02:14.000 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 4>He is not. He has not. Okay, let the guy

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:25.240
<v Speaker 4>throw and so the bring tea against the Chargers next year.

1:02:25.600 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 4>And then you know what I'm gonna do preseason next.

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Year, buddy, they spind you pick him to win the

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl is what you're gonna do.

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Probably will probably, but listen.

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>The short version of this is, I don't think the

1:02:37.080 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Chargers offense is gonna be able to move the ball

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>because I think, uh, Trent mcduffy's gonna race Ladd McConkie,

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>assuming lad plays and the Chiefs don't blow people out,

1:02:47.280 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>but they can beat the Chargers by more than three

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>and a half. And they especially with the Chargers or

1:02:52.920 --> 1:02:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs on extra rest for the first time in forever.

1:02:56.040 --> 1:02:58.800
<v Speaker 2>So for all those reasons, my five picks green Bay

1:02:58.800 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>plus three and a half, the Ions plus four and

1:03:00.920 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>a half, the Titans minus three and a half, the

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:04.919
<v Speaker 2>Rams plus four and a half, and the Chiefs minus

1:03:04.920 --> 1:03:05.439
<v Speaker 2>three and a half.

1:03:05.680 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 4>You have green Bay plus three and a half.

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to reveal any of your TV picks

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>for tomorrow? Is there one game?

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 4>Is there any? How do you? How would I reveal

1:03:14.720 --> 1:03:16.840
<v Speaker 4>one perfect? And then I have everyone else tune into

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 4>parkts picks twenty seven and fifteen against the spread. I

1:03:19.240 --> 1:03:22.000
<v Speaker 4>appreciate you letting me invite you myself on what's right

1:03:22.120 --> 1:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>to get a little bit of attention on how by

1:03:24.320 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 4>the way, sometimes we go against each other and there's

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:29.480
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of an adversarial thing. We're one and two, buddy.

1:03:29.600 --> 1:03:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen a media member come out and say

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:33.960
<v Speaker 4>that they're picking so like because second to me is

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 4>no Noah, and especially when I'm going to end up

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:37.560
<v Speaker 4>passing you.

1:03:37.640 --> 1:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>But that is correct. I do think Danny and I

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 2>have the best and second best against the spread record

1:03:46.480 --> 1:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>for anybody that's picking games documented on TV every week.

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Atlanta plus five and a half against Minnesota.

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I almost made the Vikings one of my picks,

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:00.040
<v Speaker 2>So I'm interested in.

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So I think in general, we have a recency

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 4>bias to a lot of things in life. And that

1:04:10.480 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 4>game from Kirk Cousins was indefensible. It was atrocious. There

1:04:15.360 --> 1:04:19.320
<v Speaker 4>is no defending how he played last week. But for

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of this season, like he started very slow

1:04:22.280 --> 1:04:23.640
<v Speaker 4>as he was working his way back. But then for

1:04:23.680 --> 1:04:27.439
<v Speaker 4>a large chunk of the season, Atlanta was a top

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 4>ten offense. And so I think that Minnesota their record

1:04:34.440 --> 1:04:37.280
<v Speaker 4>got a ton of attention early and they deserved it

1:04:37.520 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 4>because it was shocking. It was out of nowhere. Everyone

1:04:39.560 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 4>picked them to be fourth in the NFC North and

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:46.160
<v Speaker 4>they beat good teams, so they deserved their all their

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:49.919
<v Speaker 4>hype at five and zero. But man, they have one

1:04:50.120 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 4>score wins against the Jets, the Colts, the Cardinals, the Bears,

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.000
<v Speaker 4>and the Jags, and the Jags thank you, and I

1:04:59.040 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 4>think that they were living on Brian Flores is blitzing.

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 4>They blitz, they blitzed, they blitz, they blitzed, they blitz,

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:07.280
<v Speaker 4>and that allows for some feast or famine. And so

1:05:07.320 --> 1:05:11.000
<v Speaker 4>the more that that gets put on film, the easier

1:05:11.120 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 4>it is to game plan against. So when people were

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>saying Penick should start this week, I immediately said, after the

1:05:16.760 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Foreig interception game, this isn't the spot to do that.

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Let Kirk Cousins go back to Minnesota. They're still a

1:05:22.280 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 4>favorite to make the playoffs, they still could win the division,

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:26.600
<v Speaker 4>they still could have a home playoff game, And let

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 4>the veteran quarterback who's seen every defense in the world

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:34.800
<v Speaker 4>play Brian Flores in his blitz scheme and see if

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 4>he can go to Minnesota and pick that defense apart

1:05:38.200 --> 1:05:40.880
<v Speaker 4>and recover from the Feig interception game. If he throws

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>three picks gets sacked six times, then it's Michael Pennix

1:05:44.240 --> 1:05:45.960
<v Speaker 4>and you move on. So I look at this as

1:05:46.040 --> 1:05:49.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of a Kirk Cousins last stand, and five and

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 4>a half points is too many for a team that

1:05:53.000 --> 1:05:57.440
<v Speaker 4>is not at all winning in convincing fashion against bad teams.

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Listen, that's all sound that. The concern is that Kirk

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Cousins is cooked. Okay, he's going to get annihilated.

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 4>That is that is definitely in play, and Atlanta has

1:06:09.440 --> 1:06:12.440
<v Speaker 4>no pass rush of their own. So I think that

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:14.520
<v Speaker 4>both teams could score in that spot. But five and

1:06:14.560 --> 1:06:17.120
<v Speaker 4>a half's a big number for Kirk Cousins in a

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Atlanta has no pass rush.

1:06:18.680 --> 1:06:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you would think the third most talented quarterback in

1:06:21.000 --> 1:06:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the league might be able to carve him up last

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:26.040
<v Speaker 2>week instead of throwing for one sixty and zero touchdowns.

1:06:26.040 --> 1:06:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Again, it was needing six, it was You would think

1:06:29.040 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 4>it a great situation.

1:06:30.960 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>You would think justin herber Wou'd be able to muster

1:06:32.960 --> 1:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>more than ten offensive points against that Falcon's past rush.

1:06:36.800 --> 1:06:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Injuries, injuries, of course, the injuries. Injuries. All right.

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>The only thing hotter than Danny's picks this year or

1:06:43.720 --> 1:06:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Demands's teaser.

1:06:44.840 --> 1:06:45.240
<v Speaker 4>That's true.

1:06:45.320 --> 1:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>He'll give his teaser and we'll.

1:06:46.800 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Do the offer.

1:06:47.600 --> 1:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>And this has been a long pot. Then we got

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 2>to get out of here.

1:06:49.720 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 4>That's next. Danny. Appreciate you, brother, Thanks sir.

1:06:51.880 --> 1:06:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Check out breakfast Ball on FS one eight to ten

1:06:54.080 --> 1:06:59.360
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern five to eight am Pacific. Very very quick break,

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>come right, in fact, just stick around Danny fo Demonse's

1:07:03.680 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Demonse's teaser, and that way we don't have to recalibrate everything.

1:07:07.080 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Very quick break. Right back with Demanse, we'll track.

1:07:13.600 --> 1:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, Welcome back in What's Right with Nick? Right,

1:07:15.880 --> 1:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Danny PARKINSTI by the show, Demonse. Sorry kicking you off

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:22.880
<v Speaker 2>that segment, but appreciate you you left cause I could

1:07:22.920 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>still see your the where you're at your monitor, and

1:07:26.080 --> 1:07:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the chair was empty for a bit. I thought you

1:07:27.720 --> 1:07:30.919
<v Speaker 2>might have just left, and like, this is ridiculous. I'm

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:33.760
<v Speaker 2>out of here right there. I was still listening to

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:37.040
<v Speaker 2>see you guys. All right, So last week your teaser

1:07:38.240 --> 1:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>covered by twenty points both legs, basically, right. You had

1:07:42.880 --> 1:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders getting twenty, they lost by two, so that

1:07:45.920 --> 1:07:49.040
<v Speaker 2>covered by eighteen. You had the Steelers getting ten, they

1:07:49.120 --> 1:07:52.280
<v Speaker 2>won by ten, right, so that they won by six,

1:07:52.680 --> 1:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>so they covered by sixteen.

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:56.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, what do you have for us this week?

1:07:57.080 --> 1:07:58.960
<v Speaker 3>This week is a two team seven and a half

1:07:59.000 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 3>point teaser at a minus won sixty three. Again, we're

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>teasing Carolina up to plus twenty against her at Philly.

1:08:07.480 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>And I'm also gonna tease up Chicago to eleven at

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:15.200
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. Yeah, I mean, Philly is obviously dominant, but

1:08:15.280 --> 1:08:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I trust the Panthers and Bryce Young. I think that

1:08:18.200 --> 1:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>he's he's been showing some stuff and I think that

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:23.439
<v Speaker 3>he can cover a twenty point spread against the Eagles

1:08:23.760 --> 1:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>and then the Bears. I honestly could see them winning

1:08:26.360 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that winning that game out right, So I trust them

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>with the eleven points.

1:08:30.479 --> 1:08:35.120
<v Speaker 4>That's the I worry a little bit about Philly's offense

1:08:35.160 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 4>against that Panthers defense, that that could that could get

1:08:39.400 --> 1:08:43.479
<v Speaker 4>out of hand. Panthers worst rush defense in the league. Yeah,

1:08:43.560 --> 1:08:47.519
<v Speaker 4>that's part. But Bryce Young, I like the logic. Bryce

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Young looks good since he's been benched.

1:08:50.120 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 3>He's playing for his job next year. I mean he's

1:08:51.840 --> 1:08:52.479
<v Speaker 3>probably already got.

1:08:52.720 --> 1:08:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I love the Chicago leg of it, so because I

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 2>don't think the Niners can blow anyone out the way

1:08:59.439 --> 1:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>they are right now, and the Bears maybe the fired

1:09:02.320 --> 1:09:05.599
<v Speaker 2>coach bump. So I usually give these teasers grades, Danny,

1:09:05.680 --> 1:09:07.479
<v Speaker 2>since you're hero, I'll let you give it a grade.

1:09:08.040 --> 1:09:10.559
<v Speaker 4>You go like eight eight, eight yeah, yeah, yeah, okay,

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:15.800
<v Speaker 4>yeah great, that's how grades work. Uh yeah, So I'll

1:09:15.840 --> 1:09:19.720
<v Speaker 4>say I'll say that's a that's a solid B plus.

1:09:19.120 --> 1:09:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I like the Carolina and Chicago legs. Yeah, that's a

1:09:22.640 --> 1:09:25.559
<v Speaker 4>B plus teaser. The eye seven and a half minus

1:09:25.560 --> 1:09:27.639
<v Speaker 4>one sixty five is just a teaser that I would

1:09:27.640 --> 1:09:28.080
<v Speaker 4>never make.

1:09:28.520 --> 1:09:32.559
<v Speaker 2>But this has been his he's been doing the seven

1:09:32.560 --> 1:09:33.599
<v Speaker 2>and a half's the whole year.

1:09:33.720 --> 1:09:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was trying to team next year. We did

1:09:38.160 --> 1:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>like a five leg teaser last year.

1:09:39.840 --> 1:09:42.200
<v Speaker 4>So I would I.

1:09:42.200 --> 1:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Would recommend instead of adding a team, subtracting a point,

1:09:47.160 --> 1:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>there we go. Instead of going to UH three teamer,

1:09:51.240 --> 1:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I would potentially go to a six and a half six,

1:09:54.720 --> 1:09:55.920
<v Speaker 2>six and a half point teaser.

1:09:56.160 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 4>All right, what's the offer this week? Demands?

1:09:59.280 --> 1:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>So, the offer that this week we're gonna go back

1:10:00.920 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 3>to the touchdown Genie So and actually we're gonna start

1:10:04.080 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 3>with tonight's game. Do you see anybody scoring?

1:10:06.240 --> 1:10:06.400
<v Speaker 4>There?

1:10:06.479 --> 1:10:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Is anybody you want to you want to pick up there?

1:10:08.600 --> 1:10:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:10:08.880 --> 1:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>So here, Danny, there are the odds the for anytime

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:14.439
<v Speaker 2>touchdown score.

1:10:14.560 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've already bet one. Josh Jacobs. Oh yeah, minus

1:10:18.040 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 4>one fifty. I think I got minus one forty first

1:10:20.439 --> 1:10:20.920
<v Speaker 4>thing this morning.

1:10:20.960 --> 1:10:24.320
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, but so that's what I was I was thinking,

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:30.519
<v Speaker 2>Josh Jacobs anytime touchdown score minus one fifty. You don't

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:35.479
<v Speaker 2>love laying minus numbers obviously on touchdowns, but you got I.

1:10:35.439 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 4>See, I don't. I don't mind that they're they're giving

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:40.800
<v Speaker 4>the guy twenty plus touches a game, like if if

1:10:41.080 --> 1:10:43.439
<v Speaker 4>they get inside the five, you know he's gonna get

1:10:43.560 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 4>multiple touches in that spot. So like I, I never

1:10:47.280 --> 1:10:49.800
<v Speaker 4>fear laying a I mean, the guys he will score

1:10:49.840 --> 1:10:51.880
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown to night. He will score a touchdown to night.

1:10:51.960 --> 1:10:53.040
<v Speaker 4>So lay minus one fifty.

1:10:53.040 --> 1:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, all right, We'll do minus one fifty, and

1:10:56.280 --> 1:11:00.040
<v Speaker 2>then I'm gonna put little bonus just in honor of

1:11:00.600 --> 1:11:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the tiny hands gimmick from this past from yesterday's show,

1:11:04.720 --> 1:11:10.679
<v Speaker 2>a little tiny taste on Green Bay Defense Special Teams

1:11:11.479 --> 1:11:15.400
<v Speaker 2>touchdown scorer at plus five point fifty and maybe an

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:20.080
<v Speaker 2>even smaller taste on Green Bay Defense Special Team's first

1:11:20.160 --> 1:11:24.599
<v Speaker 2>touchdown scorer at thirty to one. So there it is, Danny,

1:11:24.680 --> 1:11:27.479
<v Speaker 2>great job Banks. Now we'll get to some the save

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 2>these some of these listener questions.

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 4>We'll do them at the end of Tuesday show.

1:11:31.280 --> 1:11:33.120
<v Speaker 2>We got a run. I'm gonna be late for TV

1:11:33.760 --> 1:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>check out breakfast Ball in the morning, we're gonna have

1:11:36.080 --> 1:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Demonsy's gonna his teaser. I'm gonna have another four in

1:11:38.920 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 2>one week. Danny's gonna go one and two on TV

1:11:41.680 --> 1:11:43.720
<v Speaker 2>with the one being the one that he agreed with

1:11:43.760 --> 1:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>me on and I'm gonna pass him in the standings

1:11:46.400 --> 1:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>and again fair sports media awful announcing the puck the

1:11:52.200 --> 1:11:56.320
<v Speaker 2>guys at the post. Anybody, somebody write an article about

1:11:56.360 --> 1:12:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the two best football gambling pickers being two guys who

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>have known each other for twenty years, went to college together,

1:12:04.320 --> 1:12:07.439
<v Speaker 2>did radio together in Kansas City, now do TV together.

1:12:07.479 --> 1:12:11.479
<v Speaker 2>At FS one, we're combined fifty thirty and one against

1:12:11.479 --> 1:12:14.599
<v Speaker 2>the spread. We actually beat a D thirty and one

1:12:14.640 --> 1:12:19.080
<v Speaker 2>against the spread. Where's the media covered? Hey, folks, steven

1:12:19.160 --> 1:12:24.479
<v Speaker 2>A's contract, that beat is covered, like that ground has

1:12:24.600 --> 1:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>been covered. What you know, I'm just letting you know.

1:12:28.320 --> 1:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know what's also been covered. Yeah, Dana Rolofsky's

1:12:32.040 --> 1:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>silly little VR tool. Everyone, it's the greatest thing I've

1:12:35.040 --> 1:12:37.080
<v Speaker 2>ever seen in the media. Give me a break, Like

1:12:37.560 --> 1:12:39.599
<v Speaker 2>somebody talk, we're making people money.

1:12:39.800 --> 1:12:43.920
<v Speaker 4>See you guys on TV later. What's right? Hey? Thanks

1:12:43.960 --> 1:12:44.519
<v Speaker 4>for watching?

1:12:44.560 --> 1:12:46.960
<v Speaker 2>If you're still here, do me a favor. Hit the

1:12:47.000 --> 1:12:49.519
<v Speaker 2>subscribe button, then hit the bell so you can be

1:12:49.600 --> 1:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>notified when we have new episodes. After you've done that,

1:12:53.160 --> 1:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>one more favor, go to your favorite audio platform of

1:12:56.080 --> 1:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>choice and subscribe there as well. Don't forget we're live

1:13:00.280 --> 1:13:04.559
<v Speaker 2>every Tuesday and Thursday ten thirty am Eastern Ish ten

1:13:04.640 --> 1:13:07.679
<v Speaker 2>thirty five, ten forty. It sometimes changes, but that's why

1:13:07.720 --> 1:13:10.440
<v Speaker 2>you hit the bell. You hit the bell so you're notified.

1:13:10.520 --> 1:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>You subscribe so we can get to two hundred thousand followers.

1:13:14.439 --> 1:13:16.760
<v Speaker 2>We're right around one hundred and fifty thousand. We'd love

1:13:16.800 --> 1:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>to get to two hundred thousand. Get to Monday, another plaque,

1:13:19.520 --> 1:13:22.960
<v Speaker 2>so like, subscribe rate, send a rating to do all

1:13:22.960 --> 1:13:23.599
<v Speaker 2>that cool stuff.

1:13:23.640 --> 1:13:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks guys,