WEBVTT - Tech News: A Corrupted File Grounded All US Aircraft Yesterday

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? It is time for

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Thursday, January twelve, two thousand twenty three.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday morning, flights across the United States were grounded because

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of a corrupted file in the Federal Aviation Administration's computer systems.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>So the f a A overseas flight operations here in

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and if it can't operate, ain't no

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>flying being done. The corrupted file was in the f

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>a a's Notice to Air Missions system a k A

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>n O T A M, which I like to think

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is no TAM instead of not AM, but I don't

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>honestly know. The purpose of a system is to send

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>alerts to pilots to let them know about potential issues

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like hazards that they could encounter along their planned flight route.

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And as you can imagine, that information is really important.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It can help pilots reroute to avoid problems that otherwise

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>could really be serious. And so the entire fleet of

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>commercial planes across the United States had to hold off

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>until the problem could be fixed. Making matters worse, the

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>corrupted file was also found in the backup systems, so

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>there was no way to just switch to a secondary

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>system because those also had the corrupted files in them. Fortunately,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the f a A was able to fix the issue

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and get operations moving again before I got too late

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in the day, but thousands of flights were delayed and

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>hundreds were canceled. The f a A is going to

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>investigate the incident, as is the Department of Transportation, but

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>officials say that as of right now, there's no evidence

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that this was at all related to any kind of

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>cyber attack or anything like that. It was probably a

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.639
<v Speaker 1>much more mundane issue. It does, however, point to how

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a an error like this can bring an entire uh

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>sector of the travel industry to a halt. And you know,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a sobering thought to think that that's really

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>all that stands between operations and a lack thereof UH. So, Yeah,

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. There's clearly a need to find out what

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>caused this issue in order to prevent such things from

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>happening again in the future. Now for a quick update

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on the f t X situation. Now in case you

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, f t X was the second largest cryptocurrency

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>exchange in the world before the whole thing went belly

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>up due to some creative bookkeeping. That's a nice way

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to say that. Apparently f t X was secretly sending

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>customer funds to cover investments made by a sister company

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>called Alimated Research. The organization is going through bankruptcy and

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>liquidation right now as it tries to recapture as much

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>money as possible to return to creditors and stakeholders. According

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to f t x as lawyers, they've recovered more than

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars so far in liquid and digital assets.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>The company still laims to recapture money on four point

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars worth of less liquid assets. That means

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna have to be some steps made in order

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to convert these assets into cash, and there's no guarantee

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that the amount secured is going to be the same

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as that four point six billion dollar valuation. Now this

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is impressive news, but it still means that individual investors

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are looking at getting only thirteen cents for every dollar

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they invested, which is a huge loss. Amazon appealed to

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the National Labor Relations Board or in l RB to

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>overturn a unionization vote at the JFK eight warehouse facility

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on Staten Island, New York. Unsurprisingly, the n l RB

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>denied this appeal they cited with the workers. In fact,

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this is so unsurprising that critics are suggesting that what

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is doing is just going through this process mainly

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to delay negotiations between the company and the newly formed

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>worker union. Amazon plans to appeal again to the n

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>l RBS National Board in Washington, assuming the n l

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>r B will uphold the vote again and there's no

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>reason to assume otherwise. The next step would be to

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>take the matter to federal court, and it sounds like

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is determined to make this process as arduous as possible,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe hope that a federal judge would overrule the vote

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to unionize. And it's really hard to predict whether or

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>not that would actually work out. Because the US has

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a bumpy history with unions and workers rights, there's been

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a general push back against tech companies over recent years.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of that pushes actually bipartisan. Both conservatives and liberals

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>have been pushing back, but the motivations are frequently very different.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>But the US also had a long stretch of the

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>government being less than supportive when it comes to workers

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>versus the giant tech companies they work for. Salaried Microsoft

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>workers have a new benefit called discretionary time off. And

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this isn't being snarky, this is, honest to goodness, a

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>real benefit. So essentially, salaried employees are now able to

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>take unlimited time off. Folks who currently have unused vacation

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>days under the old system will receive a payout later

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, and even brand new salaried employees will be

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>able to take advantage of this flexible time of policy

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>once it goes into effect on January. Hourly workers will

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not receive this benefit, but according to Microsoft, the reason

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for that isn't that the company values them less. Instead,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's that the various federal and state wage and our

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>laws prevent the company from extending this benefit to hourly employees,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>who are guaranteed certain minimums by law. Also, if Microsoft

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>salaried employees work outside the US, their vacation policy will

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>remain unchanged due to similar such laws and regulations that

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>apply to them wherever they happen to be working. But yeah,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>if you are a salary to Microsoft employee in the

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>United States. Soon you're gonna have unlimited time off, which

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds so nice. Of course, some folks are likely going

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>to have jobs where they can't just take off time

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>willy nilly because of deadlines and such. I know that's

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>hard for a lot of my coworkers and myself, like

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for us to take a day off work

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>because for those of us who publish every day, those

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>deadlines still exist. But me, I never work a day

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in my life because my job is what I love.

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>That's what I keep telling myself. That's what I keep

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>telling myself. Okay, I've got another AI story to share

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with y'all. The Bite reported yesterday that c net, a

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>tech news and review outlet which has employed several of

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>my friends throughout the years, has been using AI on

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the q T to generate certain articles. Now, they're not

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>using it to generate breaking news articles or product reviews

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Instead, they're using it for more

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>evergreen articles in the c net financial pages that aim

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to explain things like c d S as in certificate

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of deposit not compact disc In other words, these are

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>articles meant to inform people about money matters well. The

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>bite found that several articles, more than seventy of them,

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had this generic byline of c net money staff, and

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>if you clicked on that byline you would see the

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>phrase this article was generated using automation technology, which I'm

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:49.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna chastise c NET. That's passive voice. Really,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it should read automation technology generated this article. Anyway, it

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a surprise. The note on the

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>byline also explains that each automated article went through edits

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and fact checking to make sure it was accurate, so

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it kind of sounds like this was an experiment. Seen

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it had not issued any sort of press release about

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>using AI to generate articles, which makes this discovery a

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit awkward. Though again Seen it did include this

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>information in the byline info on purpose, so anyone could

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>have come across this. It wasn't exactly, you know, hidden

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond discovery. It wasn't in a disused lavatory with a

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>sign on the door saying beware of the leopard. Obviously,

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing will spark conversations about relying upon

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>AI instead of, say, paying an actual human being to

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>write the article. But then again, this article kind of

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>falls into uh, let me just call it boring topics.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>These articles can be tedious and unfulfilling to write. Trust me.

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I used to write those kinds of articles occasionally for

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Now, a lot of the articles I

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>wrote for How Stuff Works were great. It was very engaging.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I was excited to get the assignment. But there was

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a point where I had to write about seven articles

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>related to towing, as in towing something behind a vehicle.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>And you might think, Wow, that sounds dull as heck,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>and you'd be right. I hated doing it. In those cases,

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Having an AI system that could generate the initial article

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and then have a human editor to fact check and

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>make edits might have been a welcome edition. Like if

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>they had offered that, like, hey, would you rather we

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>take these articles off your assignment and give them to

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a I, I would have said yes please. So this

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of falls into one of the three d s

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>that AI is supposed to help out with. Those d

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>s are dirty, dangerous, and dull. So these are jobs

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that humans can do and have done, but they aren't

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily rewarding jobs, and in some cases they could be

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>outright harmful. So is there danger in assigning those kinds

0:09:55.040 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of articles to AI. Well, maybe not, but then our

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>company is going to stop with the dull articles or

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>will they just use AI to generate articles for more

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting and rewarding work. And if the AI underperforms compared

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 1>to human writers and journalists and editors, what harm would

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that do to the general public? These are some big

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>questions anyway, According to Engadget, c net subsequently removed the

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>c net Money staff bio page, so you can no

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>longer see that phrasing I mentioned earlier, but it had

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>not commented on actual use of AI as of the

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>recording of this episode. By the time you hear it.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>That might be different. But um, in fact, it may

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>have happened by the time I started recording, but while

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I before I started, it had not there not been

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>any comment. Okay, we're gonna take a quick break. When

0:10:48.800 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we'll have some more news items we're back.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Meta sent out an email to folks who own an

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>original Oculus Quest headset that's the first generation of the

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Quest headsets, and they explained that the company is no

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>longer going to send feature updates to the original Quest. Also,

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>those Quest headsets will lose the ability to interact with

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Meta's social VR applications. You won't be able to create

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or join a party for group VR sessions using an

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>original quest uh. They will still be able to access

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>other types of apps and such, and you'll be able

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to play games and everything on them, but a lot

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of the functionality that fleshed out the Quest will no

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>longer operate. What's more, Meta plans to end security patches

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.599
<v Speaker 1>and bug fixes for the Quest next year. Now, the

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Quest came out four years ago, and this, my friends,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>concerns me a bit, and that's because it points out

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>another potential downside er Meta's whole Metaverse vision. So if

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the Metaverse does require some sort of mixed reality peripheral

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to access it, not only well people have

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to cough up the money to buy the hardware, they

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>also may see that the hardware could drift out of

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>being supported after a while, and that means that the

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>customer will have to buy new hardware to continue to

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>access the Metaverse. In some ways, this isn't that different

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>from other computational devices, right. I mean, to play the

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>latest games at the highest settings, gamers have to rebuild

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>or purchase new rigs on a fairly regular basis, or

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they get left behind. Uh. Same with phones, like after

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a few years, the companies that make smartphones have developed

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the OS to a point where older models can't run

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the latest versions of the O S. This just kind

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of happens. But if you're talking about accessing a persistent

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>online world that presumably is the next incarnation of what

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it is to be online, then having to buy new

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>equipment because the company stops supporting the stuff you already

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>own really stinks. And it stinks because the Internet is

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a critical component to interacting with the modern world, and

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it already represents a huge gap between the halves and

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the half nots. There is a large digital gap, and

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>there are populations of people who are disproportionately harmed by

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they don't have regular access to the Internet.

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>Once you start throwing in expensive hardware that goes out

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of date every few years, that will make that gap

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 1>grow wider, and the effects could be devastating. Anyway, I

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>guess Quest owners should just go out and purchase a

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Quest to don't buy a Quest pro though every review

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I have read says pretty much they are not worth

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the very high price tag, So buyer beware. Glass Door,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ampany that allows employees to rate their employers, releases a

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>report every year on the one best places to work

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>based upon those employee reviews, and for the first time

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in ages, Meta, as in the former Facebook and Apple

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have dropped off of this list. Now, I suppose this

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't that surprising, considering that both companies took hard stances

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on pushing people back into the office as early as

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they could. Apple kept putting that date back because there

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>were a lot there's a lot of employee resistance, but

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it was still very much firm that no, we want

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you in this office. Gosh darn it, this is like

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the most expensive office we've ever built, and we need

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>people inside it, and you're gonna go. And of course

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Meta has had multiple controversies and scandals, plus a CEO

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>who outright said there were people at the company who

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't be there. That's not great for employee morale.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Layoffs have had an effect at Facebook slash Meta, But

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>according to Glassdoor economists Annual Jao, we shouldn't think of

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>this as Apple and Meta becoming terrible places to work,

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's not necessarily the case. Instead, he says, this

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>year's list was really competitive, So maybe you could look

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>at it as saying, it's not so much that folks

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hate working at Apple and Meta, it's just that people

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>who are working at other companies love their employers more.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's a silver lining. I guess Ours Technica has

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a powerful article that I urge you to read. It

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is a good one. It is titled Iran to use

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition to identify women without hitge jobs. Now, as

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the headline points out, the Iranian government enforces strict dress

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>requirements and modesty codes, which include the requirement for women

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to wear a h job in public. That's a head

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>covering that's worn by some Muslim women, and while the

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>practice has its roots in religious observance, many women have

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>argued that the government requirement is really the Iranian government

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>attempting to suppress and control women within the country and

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to take away their agency. Last September, a young woman

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>named Massa Amini was arrested and reportedly beaten for quote

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>unquote improperly wearing her h jab. It apparently wasn't tight

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to her head to satisfy police. She died in

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>police custody a few days later, and that sparked massive

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>protests across Iran. Now there's a concern that Iranian police

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>are using facial recognition technology to not only spot women

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who are violating this very strict dress code, but to

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>identify those women. And according to the article, there are

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>eyewitnesses who have said that police sometimes show up days

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>later at a person's house in order to arrest them.

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And that does imply that they're relying upon some form

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of methodology to identify people days after an alleged violation.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not that's facial recognition, uh that that's up

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for debate, because it could be other methods, But there

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a pretty strong implication that facial recognition

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is playing an increasingly prominent role in police activity. Now,

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken in the past about how official use of

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition technology is bad, it's immoral. Now mostly in

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>those cases what I was talking about, I was talking

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about bias that could be in models and that can

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>lead to misidentification cases and wrongful imprisonment and upending innocent

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>person's life based off faulty technology that should not be

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>used in this kind of application. But in an extreme

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>case like the one that we're talking about, with Iran.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's beyond question that facial recognition technology is

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>facilitating human rights violations. Last year, I did a loose

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>history of social networks, and I mentioned towards the end

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of that series the rise of some politically far right

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Parlor, and I briefly talked about how Parlor

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>has had a rocky existence, to put it lightly, and

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>how late last year Yea formerly Kanye West, was in

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>talks to purchase the company. Yea had been singing, hanging

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>out with Candice Owens, a conservative author and talking cat

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>who happens to be married to George Farmer, who is

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of you Guessed It Parlor, And so there

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>are all these stories going around that maybe Owens was

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to convince Yea to bail out Parlor

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and purchase it for himself after Yea had been kind

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of pushed off of other social platforms for repeatedly violating

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>their policies, and Parlor itself had been on unsteady financial

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>ground and kind of needed someone to sweep in and

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and purchase the company. It had been d platform following

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the January six insurrection. Anyway, the whole deal ended up

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>falling through after Yea praised Adolph Hitler, though Parlor said

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the termination of the deal actually came from a mutual

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>decision and did not cite that particular incident. But it's

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to overlook. In the wake of the

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>deal falling through, Parlor has apparently been laying off employees

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and waves, and according to the Verge, at this point,

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Parlor is down to just twenty or so employees total.

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Most of the executive team has gone, the staff are gone,

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the users have gone either to Twitter

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>now that Elon Musk is running things, or to Donald

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Truth social platform, So we might be looking at

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the end of the line for Parlor, although the company,

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>now rebranded as Parliament Technologies, claims to have big plans

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>for the future. Okay, I've got a couple more stories

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to cover before we get to those, let's

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. We're back, and I was talking

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>about Parlor earlier and mentioned Twitter, and speaking of Twitter,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times reports that Twitter has a new

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>revenue generation scheme potentially in the works, which would be

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>auctioning off unused Twitter handles. So apparently Twitter has around

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a billion and a half user names representing inactive accounts.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So these are accounts where no one has logged in

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for ages or posted anything in a really long time.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of those user names could be really well known.

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>They might be famous handles, or they might be handles

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>that represent famous folks or brands, and so why not

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>auction those off? You know, makes the money. That's a

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>terrible idea. And here's why. Some of those names presumably

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>include folks or brands that later received verification from Twitter

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to show that they were the real deal, and then

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, those accounts became inactive. If Twitter auctions

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>off those handles, and if then Twitter allows people to

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.959
<v Speaker 1>essentially buy a verification checkmark in return from monthly subscription,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>well doesn't that mean a person could effectively pose as

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>someone else? You know, they could impersonate another entity and

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>this would all be facilitated by Twitter's own practices. Now,

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's actually gonna happen. I I think

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>even Elon Musk would say that those handles, the ones

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that represent like real people and brands, will get struck

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>from the auction. They will just be sunset it and discontinued,

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise Twitter would be inviting a whole lot of

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>grief from various companies and notable people. Now, I'm sure

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in a one and a half billion long list of handles,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 1>they've got to be some that folks actually would want,

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>simply because the handle is what they were hoping for

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. For example, maybe I would want

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter handle at Jonathan, but I couldn't get that

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because it was already taken by the time I signed

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>up for Twitter, which is why I went for John

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Strickland instead. I honestly don't remember if I even tried

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>at Jonathan. I'm sure it was taken, but I don't

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>think I tried it. Maybe I did, it was, you know,

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so many years ago. I don't have any memory. But

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if the at Jonathan handle represents an inactive account, then

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I could have a chance to bid on that handle

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>for myself. Critics have pointed out one really big issue

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that still exists with this, even if we set aside

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Twitter with sunset handles for celebrities and brands,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and that is some of those accounts probably represent people

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>who have passed away, and those people have Twitter pages

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that may serve as a kind of memorial to them,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>So would it be right to wipe out those accounts

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just to sell off handles. I mean, isn't that kind

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of erasing this person's online history? And for some people

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like that might be one of the few pieces they

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have left to remember a loved one. So yeah, there

0:22:55.640 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>are other issues on top of the whole impersonation and problem.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Video game company Ubisoft continues to be in crisis mode.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Ubisoft is the game company responsible for franchises like Far Cry,

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Assassin's Creed, and various Tom Clancy franchises, among others. And

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>you might remember from a couple of years ago that

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Ubisoft fell under scrutiny for having a toxic work environment

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and allegedly scuzz ball leaders who were predatory towards employees.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>It was really bad stuff that later kind of got

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>drowned out by Activision Blizzard when Activision Blizzard said, hey,

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>hold my beer. Anyway, Ubisoft has had a series of

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>financial setbacks, and last June Ubisoft canceled four titles that

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>were in development that included a couple of Tom Clancy titles.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Then Ubisoft saw some of its releases fall far short

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of projected sales, so they did poorly in the market,

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and now the company has announced it has canceled three

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>more titles that were in development. They did not specify

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>what those titles were, and that on top of that,

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Skull and Bones, the long delayed Pirate Combat game, is

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>getting another delay, which I think would make this the

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>sixth time that game has been delayed. Who was supposed

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to launch in early March, so in a couple of months,

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>but now it's going to come sometime in the twenty

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>three to twenty twenty four fiscal year ubisas fiscal years

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>begin in April, so it is possible that the delay

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>could just be a month or so. The company plans

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to reduce costs by around two hundred million euro which

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is around two d sixteen million US dollars over the

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>next two years, and that will likely include stuff like

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>layoffs and selling off certain assets. So yeah, it's not

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not out of the troubled waters yet, it's still

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>got a ways to go. Now for a couple of

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>out of this world stories. First up, Russia announced yesterday

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that next month it's going to send up an empty

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>spaceship to the International Space Station in order for two

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>cosmonauts and an astronaut to return to Earth. They were

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>supposed to take a Soayu's MS twenty two crew capsule

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>last month because it was already attached the I S S,

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but a very tiny space rock hit the capsule and

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently caused a radiator coolant leak. So there's a concern

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that the capsule could overheat upon re entry due to

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that coolant leak, and so they needed to look at

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>an alternative plan. So the rock was said to be

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just a millimeter in diameter and that's all it takes.

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the many reasons why it's a space

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is trying to kill you, because there's not a lot

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>up there, but the stuff that is up there is

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>dangerous anyway. Russia plans to send up the new Soya's

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>capsule designated MS twenty three two International Space Station on

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>February that will bring the two cosmonauts and astronaut back home.

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's being called a replacement so Ya's rather than a

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>rescue soyas as everyone who is aboard the International Space

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Station is safe and sound. It's just that their ride

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>home for three of these folks got a flat and

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>now a buddy's gonna send over a different GELOPI to

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>take those folks home or something. Anyway, best wishes for

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the crew and that the replacement mission goes off without

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a hitch. Finally, the James Webb Space Telescope has made

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>its first new exo planet discovery. Now that's just one

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of the things that scientists are using the telescope to

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>do is to look for exo planets, and this one

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is a beautiful little piece of real estate. That's a

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>quick forty one light year jaunt away. It's got the

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>charming name of LHS for seven five B. So if

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you get to LHS for seven five C, you have

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>gone too far. Just make a left at the shell station.

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>The planet is relatively close to its home star, and

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>by relatively close, I mean very very close. That star

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is very tiny. It's very dim, as in, it doesn't

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>give off much light. I'm not saying star isn't very intelligent,

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>unlike a lot of other stars I can think of. Anyway,

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>The planet is so close to its star that a

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>year on LHS four seven five B lasts just two

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Earth days. So every two days on Earth is a

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>year on LHS for seven five B. And you thought

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>two was over really quickly. All jokes aside, the discovery

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is an exciting one as it points to a great

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>future of using the telescope to identify more exoplanets. Beyond that,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the telescope could be useful in detecting atmosphere. Beyond that,

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it gets a little tricky. Just detecting atmosphere is hard

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because you actually are looking for indirect evidence that an

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere exists by looking for things like shimmer when you're

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>observing the planet now, it may eventually help us identify

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>plants that could potentially support life on them. So that's

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>really exciting too. All of this being said, even this

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 1>powerful telescope has its limits, and if planets fall out

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>outside certain parameters, we might not be able to tell

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>very much beyond yeah, we think there's a planet there.

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>But still, it's a very exciting time for astronomy. And

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that's it for the tech News for Thursday, January two,

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. I hope you are all well. If you

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for topics I should cover in future episodes

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff, reach out to me. One way is

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to download the I Heart radio app. It's free to download,

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>free to use. Navigate the Tech Stuff by putting that

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>name in the little search engine. It will take you

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to the page. There's a little microphone icon. If you

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>click on that, you can leave a voice message up

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seconds in link for me, or if you prefer,

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you can handle over to Twitter and send me a tweet.

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is tech stuff hsw That

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one will not be auctioned off because it remains somewhat active.

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I tweet on it occasionally. Uh. But yes, you can

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.479
<v Speaker 1>send me messages through that and I see all of

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>those and I will talk to you again. Release soon.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Y text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.