WEBVTT - Betterment CEO on Empowering More Women in Finance

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebec from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Late last year, Bloomberg News reported how for gen Z,

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it's daunting to think about saving, investing and planning for

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a retirement and in markets that have been in turmoil

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>with a possible recession looming, and as wages haven't kept

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>pace with inflation and more so, let's get some thoughts

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>on financial wellness with us is Sarah Levy. She's chief

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of the independent Digital Investment Advisor. We're talking

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>about betterment. Sarah, by the way, spend over twenty years

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at Viacom, was COO there. She is joining us via

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>zoom in New York City. Hey Sarah, great to have

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you here with Katie and myself. What's the question, first

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of all, that you get most asked about in this

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>investment environment. To say it's unusual probably an understatement. That

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is an understatement. Thank you so much to both of

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. I think probably right now, the

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>most common question is a pretty basic one, which is

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>what should I do with my money in these volatile times?

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a question being asked by investors

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>really at all stages of their investment journey, and so

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all stages of their investment journey. Obviously, if you think

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>over the past two years, the retail investor was a

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>type of investor that we got very well acquainted with. Obviously,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the market environment in twenty twenty two was much different

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>from twenty twenty one. Twenty twenty What is the state

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of the retail investor now? What are you seeing at Betterment?

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.639
<v Speaker 1>So our philosophy in general has been sort of tried

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and true in terms of starting with a long term plan,

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sticking to your plan, being diversified, and not getting distracted

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>by the markets. What is interesting to see right now

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, there are other platforms and investment

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>solutions that don't necessarily preach that sort of consistency. And so,

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>as you point out in twenty twenty one that there

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of excitement sort of chasing the latest trend,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>we a Betterment never really believed in that, and so

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think by and large we attract that a consumer

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>who agreed with that philosophy, which was, you know, don't

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>get just don't get distracted, and don't make changes when

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the market moves, because this is really about a long

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>term play and it's about long term savings. So if

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you take that as context, what we're seeing now is

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing a lot more money being put into

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>savings because it's a high yield environment and there are

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great rate available while people are sort

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of waiting out you know, the Fed, and waiting to

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>see kind of what the markets are going to do. Great,

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what I wanted to ask you. Your platform, you know,

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>avails you a lot of information, and I was curious

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>what were some of the dominant broader investment trends right now.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So people in cash shorter investment trends basically maybe assign

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>a big sign of risk off at this point and

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just kind of waiting it out. Yes, I would say

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure risk off. Savings is absolutely a place people

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>are putting their money. But retirement investing, I would say,

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is remaining stable. So people putting money into iras, people

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>putting money into their four oh one ks, those remain

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>really good sort of long term thinking about compounding interest

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about kind of tax advantaged investing, I would

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>say is much more resilient than taxable accounts. Right now, Sara,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are they reducing the amount of money that they're putting

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in their four oh one K or retirement accounts as

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a result, as we talk about this kind of more

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>cautious stance, we're not seeing that. We're seeing a very

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent habits in retirement accounts. And what we're seeing is

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>really a shift that money we maybe saw last year

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>going into investing, those same dollar values are going into

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>savings this year. And when you say going into savings,

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>could you break down a little bit more of what

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that means because the conversation I have all the time

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is that cash earns something. Right now, if you're talking

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>about treasury bills, if you're talking about money market accounts,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know the yields there are higher than they have

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>been in a long time. I mean, just specify what

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you mean by savings, that's right, Yes, So I think

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on our platform what we offer is a high yield

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>cash account. So that's where we're really seeing the activity.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>We're currently offering a four percent apy and that's really

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>top of market. One of the things you see is

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the bigger banks have lower rates and

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that they are benefiting from this cash environment, but we

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>see the opportunity to really pass that along to our consumers.

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And so it's been a really great way for our

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly for our tenured customer base, but also for new

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>customers to kind of enter for the first time and say,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to put my cash here, I'm going to

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>get some yield. And there hasn't really been a tremendous

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of incremental yield to be gained through duration. So

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea of sort of locking up your money isn't

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>really necessary right now in this climate because short term

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>rates are so high. So that's what we're seeing, Sarah.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>One thing I wanted to ask you aim you guys

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, you know, platforms like Betterment or robo advisors,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>no stranger to investment algorithms. The focus now on chat,

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>GPT and generative AI. What are the conversations that you

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>guys are having around that and whether some of the

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>folks on your platform are like, hey, what are you doing?

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for us? So it's interesting because

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say we are an automated platform. I think

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that AI is powering or investing would be disingenuous.

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So we really have real professionals behind the scenes, those

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>human beings. So not the technology are actually putting together

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the portfolios for us. What the technology is doing is

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.239
<v Speaker 1>rebalancing portfolios according to the rules set by the humans.

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think in that sense, things like chat GPT

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>are not acting our portfolio construction. I think where we're

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing the potential of chat CHPT again sort of very

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>early days, is thinking about messaging and marketing and taking

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the temperature of things going on in the industry. UM

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>where you know, where you can you can work with

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>your creative teams um to really kind of meet the moment.

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's so for necessarily screening for holdings more like

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>you say, it sounds like more language based applications is

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking for. So far, that's where that's where

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>we are. Um, we don't. We don't yet see the

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>application necessarily. I think, you know, humans still have a

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>real role to play an investment selection UM, and it's

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty complicated, so we're not We're not there yet. I

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>will say the humans around the world, thank you, Sarah.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>We do want to ask you Goldman Sachs with Goldman Tomorrow,

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.119
<v Speaker 1>you guys are hosting a panel uh and an event

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>International Women's Day, Financial Impowerment on the agenda. Tell us

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about it and what your your focus is. Yes,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>so I'm really excited to be joined by Patti Rafael,

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>who is a longtime Goldman Sachs Wealth Wealth executive. She's

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>had a tremendous career and so the two of us,

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're hoping to do is really sheer tips on investing,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on careers, maybe on life. And she's a fun and

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>fabulous woman, So hopefully there'll be a little personality and

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>people will come away with some practical and easy to

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>implement tips on sort of how to do the best

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>with your money. Are we getting more empowered? Can I

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>just ask you? I feel like we've been talking about

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>financial empowerment for an awfully long time, probably easily a

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>decade or two. Are we getting more financially empowered? In

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>your view? Well, I don't know that this is really

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>just about women. To be honest, I agree. I think

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>women sort of carry the stress sometimes more, and so

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what we can do is we can demystify some of

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that by really breaking it down by offering ways that

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>technology can make things kind of simple and set it

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and forget it, you know. I think what I'd like

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to do is really show people that it's not that scary.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the word investing can be scarier than the

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>word saving. And really there are just two sides at

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the same coin. Right, It's about starting early. So are

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we more empowered? I mean, you know, I like to think,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so I like to I like to think about these

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, senior women who have had great careers and

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that sets an example for what the future

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>can hold for the you know, the next generation. I

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>really like that point that savings sounds safer than investing.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, we don't have much time left. But

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm also curious. I mean, in thirty forty seconds, what

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>does financial empowerment look like? That's a word we toss

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>around all the time, but what does being empowered financially

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>actually mean? I think being empowered financially starts with a plan, right,

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's a rule of thumb you can follow or

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you can personalized, and that's you know, your choice in

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of how deep you want to go. I think

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>being financially empowered is understanding what's available to you. The

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>government offers a tremendous amount of tax advantages. You want

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of that, right, whether that's a four

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>owin k or an IRA or all the other various

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>accounts for educational savings. I think being empowered means means

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>compound interest means taking advantage. Time is money, Start now,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>no matter how small, and think and then I think. Lastly,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, make it simple and stress free.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's where technology can help. All right, I gotta

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>leave it on that note. Good luck with your event tomorrow.

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Levy, she's chief executive officer at Betterment. Joining s

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>via Zoom from New York City, Carol Master, Katie Greifeld.

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>We are Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Week podcast. Catch us live weekdays from two to five

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. The Bloomberg Business a band

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you two. You can also listen live to our flagship

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>New York station, Just Say Alexa, play Bloomberg E Love

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and Dirty. Yeah. We are talking about a ceiling, the

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling, to be exact, it's potentially the risk that

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street doesn't want to ponder this story in the

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>upcoming issue of Bloomberg BusinessWeek magazine, add on newstands later

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this week, already online at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It's also on the Bloomberg Terminal. It is written by

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Liz McCormick, Eric Watson, and Josh Wingrove and Mike Dorning. Liz,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Bloomberg News, chief correspondent for Global macro markets,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>are go to for everything on this topic, and I

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like the bond market man, you are so revered

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>around here. She joins us along with the editor of

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, Joel Webbert Joel and Liz both in

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Student. I mean, she's kind of

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a goddess, like her reputation proceeds are. I don't know

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if she knows that, but it does. Can you tell

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>my kids that let's talk about let's talk about the

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bonds and really let's talk about the debt ceiling. And

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, Lionel Richie's dancing on the ceiling.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The tone of that music and that song not the

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing that's in the tone of this story. The

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>story is all about the debt ceilings down, aren't you?

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We are? And look like it's in the forthcoming issue

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of Business Speak also Today's Big Take. What really resonated

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with me here is that it's like we've been in

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this showdown for a while already. Technically we may have

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>already crossed a line a little while ago that was

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a significant when Treasury's kind of bailed us out.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But it might get a lot worse between now and summer.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to suppress the laughter. We're going to talk

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>about this like every day for eternity soon, Yeah, I not,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But like, how bad could it get less? Well, that's

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing. And like you said, we in January hit

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that debt ceiling in which they had set a bit ago,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and thirty one point four trillion. Now the Treasury departments,

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>using extraordinary measures kind of a special accounting moves to

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>stay under it because they can't go above it. But

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Joel, that this is only going to get

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>worse because there is, of course a limit to how

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>long Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and her team can do

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>these maneuvers and stay under the debt limit, So they

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>really needs to raise it or resuspend it, which they

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>do many times, and even Chairman Pal today was talking

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and saying this is crucial. We need this, you know,

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>full stop. They need to raise the death ceiling. So

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only going to heat up. So maybe

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of prodding the markets today and our story

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>saying you know, listen, you should be worried more, but

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll get more worried for sure. I feel like part

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of the problem though, is that, you know, like you said,

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we reach the debt limit in January and then through

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary measures, the FED figure is something out and it

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like we come up against the seas ceiling and

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>then we always figure something out. What's different this time around? Potentially, well,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this time around, and you know, the gentleman

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on the story with me are the you know, Washington

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>politics experts, but that you know, Eric Wawson will tell

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you that we have a very contentious situation here where

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>both sides, you know, are you know, jockeying. You know,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans don't want a clean death sailing raise, which

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>means that we just raise it. They want to kind

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of jockey for some future spending cuts. And President Biden

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and his team is saying, no, we don't want to

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do that, and you know, they seem pretty entrenched, and

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>it kind of hearkens to twenty eleven where we had

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a very contenent stat sailing episode that they eventually did

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>come to something in the final hour, but it was

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>such a messy process that the US for the first

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>time ever by SMP got there rating downgraded from triple A,

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know that had a sting, even though we

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't see rates jump up sharply. Then you know, the

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>stock market went down and it was a tumultuous time.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's what people think this time, it's

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>going to go down to the wire. And Joel and

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I were talking that, you know, Eric had a nice

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>story of like the Democratic leader on this debt negotiation saying, hey,

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go to the mat here and that

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it really might make them What mean, the markets have

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to go crazy till Washington gets a fire under them, right,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>stock market sells off their constituent saying what's going on?

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, and then then he's realized we got to

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>come up with an agreement, right, So that that story

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that Eric wasn't did about Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania representative

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>top democrat on the budget community. When I read our

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>story and then I read that story, I was like,

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, this is this got scarier all of a sudden,

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>right because he's basically saying like, we're not going to

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>back down, like this will have to come from Republicans.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>That is not the dynamic that we had back then.

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So do that calculus exactly. That's why, like I printed

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>out Eric's story, I'm like, oh, this is troublesome, you know,

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's funny, Joel, because everyone thinks, which

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we came to in our story, that of course they'll

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>come to something. We've seen this movie before. It's a headache,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we hate it, but well they'll do it. But when

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at some of this stuff like

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Eric's laying out, it's really troublesome, and you know, like

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we hope, you know, cooler heads will prevail. No one

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>would jeopardize the US treasuries as the world's safe haven security,

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which some people say. People may not realize if there's

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a default, be it short, you know, because they'll say, oh,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>well it'll be short, you know, but that doesn't matter.

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the US doesn't default on their debt and

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if they do, it could have repercussions for years and years. Okay,

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so X date, we don't know when that is. What's

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>our best sense of not a new dating app is

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not well. Janet Yellen says they have at least

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>until like June. It seems like most of Wall Street

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is saying it probably goes until August. But it's very

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>unclear because you know, it's kind of coming at the

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>worst time. We're in tax season right and the government

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know exactly how tax flows are going. I know,

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I want a refund. They're trying to figure out of

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a Yeah, if we didn't get our refunds, I know,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, I mean, that will happen. But they don't

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know how the flows are going to be, how much

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cash flows are going to go, how

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>much refunds they're gonna have to pay out, how much

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>inflows people paying their taxes. So it's very hard for

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury to kind of have a good timing of,

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we'll run out of these maneuvers. Help

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if I was getting a refound and I said, why

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>don't you guys just sit on it till August and

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's like social Security a little bit and maybe

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I get a little bonus. Wow, you're the man. I'm

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>just thinking he's got of I don't think I'll give

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>mine whatever. Now, what rate do you want? Exactly exactly?

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's made it harder. That's why, you know, we

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>know in past times, what a lot of the traders

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>do is say, hey, listen, I'm not buying any Treasury

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>bills or bonds that have coupon payments, which is this

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>semi annual interest that's coming around that crazy X date time.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But now this X date range is so wide that

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of murky in the market. Right, people are like,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know yet what debt to avoid, right, So

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe that will become more clear as a troublesome

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>when we get a better date. You know, maybe we'll

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>get an update from the Treasury of when that X

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>date is going to be. And is there any sense

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if if the wheels start coming off this car ahead

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of that X date, do we have any sense what

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going to break? Or is it just gonna break?

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And then we're gonna find out. Well, you know, after

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven, a lot of the called parties that be

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that oversee the treasury market did a lot. They were like,

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to go through this again with having

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>no idea, So they did a lot of backup plans,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like what if, like maybe Treasury says, well, we'll delay

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the maturities a day. You know, they can deal with

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that because you have to remember there's the repurchase agreement

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>market that uses treasuries as collateral. So there's a lot

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.959
<v Speaker 1>of things that you know, what if it couldn't even function.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's been some backup plans. But even those officials say,

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but we're not sure. You know, we haven't been through

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>this before. You hope the treasury market will function. But

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Pale has also said, like, don't expect that the

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Fed can swoop in and make a cure all evils.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>That it would be repercussions on the economy for a

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>long time. It may sting borrowing costs for years and

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Years's playing that to me that if indeed we get

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that default, I mean, if somehow then there's a fix,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>quick fix after it, list would we still have that

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>long term impact. Well, that's what a lot of people say.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>If course, we don't know till it happens. But you know,

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>some very smart people have said in various stories we've

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>done that it could be cured very fast. But you

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>have to think some big investors say, I might add

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that I need a little cushion because you know the

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>US has defaulted, right, you know, so you would say

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there might be some premium added to yields, not just

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>for a day or two, maybe maybe small, but as

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a baseline for a long time because it's totally different dynamic.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, okay, so this is gonna be fun.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about this how many times? Yeah, I know,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be here for a little bit. Um, what

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do we think on the Republican side? Um, are they

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Is there any cracks anywhere in the in the in

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the wall that may be exposed here that may lead

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a small group of people to say, you

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>know what, we're not standing with McCarthy anymore. Well, not yet.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>And again the guys on the story were better on this,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and Eric was saying earlier today when we talk that

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know there's a few strongholds. Remember McCarthy took so

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 1>many votes to get him in as speaker, and he

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>had to cut some deals and you know that's made

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it harder because they also can kind of, let's just say,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in late terms, spike him as the speaker. They have

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that option, so he has a lot to kind of

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>payback to, do you know. Eric was saying that maybe,

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, McCarthy in the end, you know, do the

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>best for the country and say, you know, I'll followed

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>by sword and you know, we'll make a bipartisan deal,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that it may go that way. But again,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it comes down to markets getting ginned up,

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stock selling off, and that being in the front of

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the local papers and things that policymakers may realize, oh,

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>this is bad, and you know, we'll come up with

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a deal. So it's just hard for me to believe

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that they won't. But like you know, one investor said

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, I don't know, never say never, you know,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You know, Okay, So why throughout all of

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>this and whatever may come yet Marcus been kind of

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>singling like everything seems like it's not quite registered that

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>this could go awry. Well, I think there's a few things.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>One is, like we said, they can't kind of know

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>yet exactly when we'll hit that wall. Number two there's

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other problems, right, you know that we're

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>market went crazy today because it looks like FED will

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>raise rates even further. Inflation is going to be sticky,

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, not to minimize traders, but there's only so

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>many things they can worry about at once, right, So

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the death ceiling, they're kind of far away, yea far

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>away a little bit. We have seen US credit default swaps,

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>which is insurance against a default in the US. They're

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>not a huge product here and they're not that liquid,

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but those you know, rates have gone up, so there

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is a few people buying some hedges against a default. Right,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So I guess there's a little concern, but I think

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to get some more clarity. You know, when

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this we could hit this wall from Marcus to really

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like sell treasuries at that point in etc.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Have we heard anything from the biggest holders of US

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 1>treasuries at this point? And I think about whether to Japan.

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We always think about China when you talk about maybe

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately in the future, if we do get a default,

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll a lot more in terms of holding them. But

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>have we heard anything from global investors on that front? Well,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>sovereign nation Yeah, no, they haven't. I think they don't

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get in the middle of this fight. I'm

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>sure if it gets down to the wire, you know,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through this before. You know, China's a little

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>bit and they still hold a lot, but they're a

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit less of a player. US has a lot

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>more domestic investors than they ever had, so we're not

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>getting into that political jockeying. And I don't think they

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>would speak beforehand. But you do have private investors saying, like,

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried, Like I think I had some stories saying, oh,

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>there's not gonna be too much volatility ahead, and one

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.239
<v Speaker 1>investor emailed me, Liz the debt ceiling. You know, so

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of the private investors that are

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned that this could be you know, a lot of havoc.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And even if we don't get a default, if it

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>goes down to the wire and there's real concern, you

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>might see just see more selling of treasures. Again, we

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>have a backdrop of rates rising, inflation being sticky. There's

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of concern out there. Anyway, what I like,

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it to me like it is like this thing

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that when we started the year, I was like, oh,

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>that'll never happen, and then it's like, oh, wait, it

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>totally could happen, or or how much chicken are we

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>willing to play here with the thing that is unknown?

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And politically it is a great instrument to play to

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>play with because it's like, oh, nothing bad's really going

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to happen and we haven't, and so it does create

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this artifact that you can play with and turn into

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a political football. Um. And DC's obviously doing that. Um.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But to me, like the most worrisome thing is like

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>what breaks and you didn't know it was going to

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>break and becomes very difficult to put back together on

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it once it happens. And to this end, I mean,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>do markets have any sense of like what Treasury is

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>actually doing behind the scenes right now just to make

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>good on the existing promises that we have. Well, the

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Treasury they can't do anything shady, right They're doing this

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>is like all official that they're allowed to do, things

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like not pay the retirement funds for different things like that.

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>They're you know, able to kind of maneuver around. They

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>are issuing less treasury bills, which is their shortest of maturities.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>They've started to cut how much they issue, you know,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>whittling down there. They usually have what they call a

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>cash balance, kind of like their buffer. I think something

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>goes bad, you know, call it whatever, you know, a

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>spam attack or something that they can't get new funding,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that they have a stockpile of cash to fund you know,

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe for five days of funding needs. So but they're

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>whittling that down. So they're doing these things and that,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>but there's a limit. Josh, they can't you know, like

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all these kind of crazy issue the platinum coin, and

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about that before, it's not really Janet Yelling

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>has said this stuff is kind of gimmicky, So you

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>know that doesn't seem like I guess I would just say,

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know, here we are. We just marked one

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>year the Russian invasion Ukraine. Just these things that come

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>at US pandemic, a war, financial crisis, just when you

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think things won't happen. You know. That's just a little reminder.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Have a great Tuesday, everybody. Liz McCormick, thank you so much. Complicated,

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>important issue and you laid it out so well. Liz McCormick,

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>as she always does. She corresponded for Global Macro Markets

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg News is storying the upcoming new issue

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg business Week and our thanks to Jill Webber,

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he is the editor of Bloomberg BusinessWeek magazine. That new

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>issue on newstands on Thursday, online Bloomberg dot com, slash

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>business Week, and on the Bloomberg Missus Bloomberg. You're listening

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us live weekdays

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from two to five pm Easter on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business A Band, You two. You can also listen

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>live to our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>play Bloomberg elve and thirty. I'm broca a Journal Radio.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no no no,

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna drive home? Honney? Please, I'll do the riding gravels.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm want to drive. It's good question. This is the

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>drive to the Globe comkimmu thing well, driver up to

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>other dawn on bloom Bird Radio. All right, everybody, just

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about eight minutes left in today's trading session. Charlie of

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>course breaking down the trade. Let's get to it. Let's

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>get to our drive to the clothes gas Katie, all right,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna speak be speaking with Sue Crotty. She is

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>senior vice president and chief investment Officer over at Seagell

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Marco Adviser. She joins us on Zoom from New York

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>City and Sue, we were just listening to Ken Griffin,

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but if we rewind back to ten am, we heard

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>from Jerome Powell himself the FED share and it seemed

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>like he really shocked markets here by sticking to the script.

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>He did seem to open the door to maybe a

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point hike at the next meeting, But other

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>than that, I mean, it was higher for longer, the

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>same kind of messaging that we've been hearing from him.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>What was your takeaway, Well, exactly that higher for longer.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm always amazed that people have not believed him

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>when he's been saying this pretty clearly throughout. The problem

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is not solved. We still have inflation. We saw the

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>pattern of it coming down, you know, through the end

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year, which was good news, but it wasn't

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>down to the levels that you know, you you could

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>say that the market was going to be able to pause,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>or that he was going to be able to go

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the other way, which was sort of why it was

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 1>amazing that the whole year end and into January phenomenon

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>did occur. So a lot of hope, a hope, well,

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, do you feel like the markets are now

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>priced in terms of fixed income, treasury trade and equity

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>trade priced for what? Jay Powell reminded everybody again that

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do. So, yeah, we're getting there, you know,

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we we were saying, um here at Seagle Marco through

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year. This is a very data

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>dependent market, and you know, as it zoomed through the

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fourth border and up through January, you know, having eye up,

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty seven percent was clearly you know things

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>or the s and p up you know equally almost equally.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It got far away from itself, but you know it

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was the you know, the world trying to look ahead

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and not really listening to what the reality of the

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>data is. These things take time. This is not a

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>quick reversal. It never has been in the history of

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets, and it won't be this time either. I

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it is there's a lot of

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>people out here investing in the markets that have never

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>seen this sort of thing. So they just hoped we'd

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>go back to the you know, to anybody really seen

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing. So to be fair in that

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we're coming off a pandemic, we had tons of stimulus

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>coming at us globally, you know. True. Yeah, No, we

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a pandemic before. We haven't seen that sort

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of consumer demand that was the first thrust of this

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>whole inflation era. Absolutely, But we've seen inflation before, and

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we've known what tools are there, and we've known how

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>long it takes for those numbers to come through into

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the data. And no one seems to be

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at history very well these days, and

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people that just keep you know, look,

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we want it too. But we've always been in the

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>camp here that raising rates is a really good thing.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We were you know, when we started to raise rate

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic, it reversed it all we were cheering.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't live an world of zero rates. Zerbe is

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>not a world where you don't create a lot of

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>excesses and a lot of issues that are going to

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>come to the front at some point. So in our books,

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this is good news. You know, having a real return

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on your fixed income portfolio provides a lot of protection

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for people. It provides savers and retirees with money that

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they just couldn't get for, you know, over a decade

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>through the eighties as we as we you know, wore

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>off the first the GFC and then and then the pandemic,

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and so we don't have a ton of time here.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But when you say fixed income income actually has income nowadays,

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>what specific are you talking about? Are you talking about treasuries?

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you looking at corporate credit as well? And just

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>got about forty seconds, Well, yeah, both for sure. You know,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we're we think you should be high quality because we

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are late in the cycle in terms of you know,

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the credit. We've funded a lot of companies you know,

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>through the last decade plus that probably couldn't have gotten

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it in another environment. So you do have to be careful.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>We do believe in active management as a result of that,

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know it is going to be a little

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>trickier in corporate credit. All right, We wish we had

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>more time. Come back soon, Sue Crotty. She's Senior VP

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and Chief Investment Officer at Seagull Marco Advisors. Joining us

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>via zoom from New York City. This is the Bloomberg

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Business Week podcast available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast. Listen live each weekday starting at

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern pund bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every week day on YouTube and always

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal