1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,440 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along 3 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day 4 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,280 Speaker 2: for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics 5 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,920 Speaker 2: from our global headquarters in New York City. We are 6 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine 7 00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:31,240 Speaker 2: am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or 8 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:33,920 Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg 9 00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:36,760 Speaker 2: Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. We begin with the 10 00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:40,199 Speaker 2: big issue. Good news is good news, stocksenting Kira as 11 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:43,120 Speaker 2: data shows the economy is in seemingly good shape, but 12 00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 2: Eric Friedman of US Banks staying cautious writing solid consumer 13 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:50,519 Speaker 2: spending and labor market dynamics continue bolstering economic growth and 14 00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:55,240 Speaker 2: corporate earnings, but of both desalrated somewhat slightly constructive market 15 00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:58,760 Speaker 2: signals and near neutral macro signals continue to warrant a 16 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 2: cautiously optimist bias towards equities. Eric s Withers from More Eric, 17 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:05,119 Speaker 2: welcome back to the show. It's good to see us, sir. 18 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 2: As always, you manage client money institutional money totaling I 19 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:11,000 Speaker 2: think something like five hundred billion. Can you share with 20 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:12,960 Speaker 2: us how much of that has been in cash, just 21 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,560 Speaker 2: sort of lazy money getting rewarded in money market funds, 22 00:01:15,680 --> 00:01:17,480 Speaker 2: and how much of that has started to be deployed 23 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 2: over the last month or so. 24 00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:21,679 Speaker 3: Yeah, Jonathan, In a way, it's almost been like this 25 00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:26,920 Speaker 3: nostalgic push from both institutional and wealth clients, just viewing 26 00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 3: that hey, look I can actually get something from the 27 00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:31,520 Speaker 3: shorter end of the curve, so I'm going to stay there. 28 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 3: And I think that you know, we saw balances go 29 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:35,160 Speaker 3: up as high as ten ten and a half percent 30 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 3: in cash, and that's really worked its way down to 31 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:39,480 Speaker 3: about four and a half or five percent across our 32 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:42,800 Speaker 3: broad book of business. So that says to us that, look, 33 00:01:42,880 --> 00:01:46,880 Speaker 3: investors are getting this idea of a repricing across the curve. 34 00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:51,080 Speaker 3: And I think that that effective pivot in Jacksonville last 35 00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:53,400 Speaker 3: week was all of the you know, just the consensus 36 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:55,160 Speaker 3: view that hey, look, we're not just going to have 37 00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:58,600 Speaker 3: that nostalgic view in perpetuity. So we are seeing more 38 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:02,480 Speaker 3: of a gradual, let's call filtering into other parts of 39 00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:04,280 Speaker 3: the of the marketplace. I thought least that a really 40 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 3: nice tweet or ex whatever you call it. These days 41 00:02:07,440 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 3: regarding flows into into bond funds, we're seeing that. We're 42 00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:13,840 Speaker 3: also seeing though an extension in other parts of the 43 00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:16,800 Speaker 3: of the broader global macro trade. 44 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:19,560 Speaker 4: So that's been a positive. We think that probably continues 45 00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 4: for the next couple of months. 46 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:22,240 Speaker 2: I think we just go with POST. I think just 47 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 2: post just works. But whatever, Eric, when that cash position 48 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:27,640 Speaker 2: comes down from say ten to four and a half, five, 49 00:02:28,080 --> 00:02:30,240 Speaker 2: how sticky is that four and a half, Because certainly 50 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:32,160 Speaker 2: people are lining up on this program, Tanning us that 51 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:34,000 Speaker 2: money is going to be deployed. If it's going to 52 00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:36,960 Speaker 2: cut interest rates. Curve normalizes, you'll see that curve go 53 00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:39,920 Speaker 2: out the curve and into equities nowsewhere beyond fixed income. 54 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:43,240 Speaker 2: How stick is that four and a half from your perspective, Yeah, 55 00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:43,639 Speaker 2: we think. 56 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 4: It's pretty sticky. 57 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:46,919 Speaker 3: I think that the thing that would probably shift views 58 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:49,480 Speaker 3: out of that, Hey, let's get back into the broader 59 00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:52,920 Speaker 3: macro ecosphere if you would probably be the idea of 60 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:54,919 Speaker 3: the back end of the curve really ripping high r 61 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,160 Speaker 3: That's something that your team has done a really nice 62 00:02:57,200 --> 00:02:59,640 Speaker 3: job thinking about, like what are the factors would actually 63 00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:02,960 Speaker 3: cause interest rates to go higher on the back end. 64 00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 3: We don't think there's necessarily an immediate catalyst. There's so 65 00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 3: much focus on when does the FED start cutting how 66 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:10,919 Speaker 3: deep will that be for the next couple of quarters. 67 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:13,760 Speaker 3: But we do think that what's on the horizon as 68 00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 3: we get hopefully more specific on policy is the risk 69 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:19,600 Speaker 3: of inflation actually picks back up again. That's not something 70 00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:22,320 Speaker 3: that I think is really being discounted in commodities. It's 71 00:03:22,360 --> 00:03:24,639 Speaker 3: being something that we think is probably worth talking about. 72 00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:27,160 Speaker 3: As we get deeper into the third quarter and early 73 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:30,360 Speaker 3: early fourth quarter, probably September tenth, when we have the 74 00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 3: first and maybe the only presidential debates, there will hopefully 75 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 3: be a little more specificity about tax planning and also 76 00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:39,960 Speaker 3: about spending planning. That could be the catalyst sets up 77 00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:43,600 Speaker 3: some of the noise away from FED and the immediacy 78 00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 3: of rate cuts and into more of the let's call 79 00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:49,440 Speaker 3: it the inflationary considerations of policy, which we think is 80 00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 3: an it's an undiscounted risk right now. 81 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:54,120 Speaker 1: So just to put a bow on this, Eric and 82 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:56,280 Speaker 1: I think this there are all really interesting points to 83 00:03:56,360 --> 00:03:58,760 Speaker 1: kind of challenge the idea that there's six trillion dollars 84 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:01,760 Speaker 1: of assets and money market funds just waiting for the 85 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:03,400 Speaker 1: FED to cut rates and then that's all going to 86 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 1: be unleashed into longer duration bonds as well as into stocks. 87 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 1: It sounds like you're kind of challenging that, and you're 88 00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:11,640 Speaker 1: saying a lot of this is very sticky. Actually saw 89 00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:14,960 Speaker 1: the biggest month of inflows into cash f like funds 90 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:18,640 Speaker 1: over the past a week, going back throughout the entirety 91 00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:22,560 Speaker 1: of this year. You're saying that unless long had yields 92 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 1: go higher, that's going to probably stay, and that any 93 00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:27,839 Speaker 1: kind of optimism you have has to come from elsewhere. 94 00:04:27,880 --> 00:04:29,880 Speaker 1: Is that Is that a correct characterization? 95 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:33,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's very, very succinct and much more eloquent than 96 00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:35,320 Speaker 3: I put At least I think if you look at 97 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:37,839 Speaker 3: at fair value, we think for the ten years, probably 98 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:39,000 Speaker 3: closer like four percent. 99 00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:40,560 Speaker 4: We'd three eighty five right now. 100 00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:43,839 Speaker 3: So in a way, it's almost like duration is too 101 00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,680 Speaker 3: expensive to buy more of, but it's not too expensive 102 00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 3: to sell. 103 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 4: We're kind of in that middle. 104 00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 3: Ground, if you will, where tens, twenties, thirties, probably not 105 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:53,920 Speaker 3: a lot of issuance. Again, you did a good job 106 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 3: of covering the auction yesterday if you look at the 107 00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:01,280 Speaker 3: net participation of buyers across most auctions, it has not 108 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:03,599 Speaker 3: been foreign buyers. So who's going to be the marginal 109 00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:08,120 Speaker 3: buyer of longer term paper. Probably not the usual suspects, 110 00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:10,240 Speaker 3: if you will. So again, with a ten year at 111 00:05:10,279 --> 00:05:12,280 Speaker 3: three eighty five, we think very valigant is closer to 112 00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:15,120 Speaker 3: about four. We're in this position where without a lot 113 00:05:15,160 --> 00:05:18,680 Speaker 3: of definite policy genders from either party, we're in a 114 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:21,440 Speaker 3: bit of a no man's land, if you will, with 115 00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:25,039 Speaker 3: that trade. So duration we think is probably a little pricey. 116 00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:29,040 Speaker 3: We think that the unwind of cash probably goes elsewhere, 117 00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:31,440 Speaker 3: and that will probably be more of a trickling type 118 00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:33,840 Speaker 3: of phenomenon over the next couple of weeks and months. 119 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:36,400 Speaker 1: To take this a step further, Michael hartnett Over at 120 00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 1: Bank of America is talking about swapping out commodities in 121 00:05:40,640 --> 00:05:44,560 Speaker 1: place of bonds and the sixty four sixty forty portfolio 122 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:46,920 Speaker 1: because of some of the concerns that you're talking about. 123 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:49,200 Speaker 1: I don't know that you're going to say, you know, 124 00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:52,000 Speaker 1: sixty should be all commodities or whatever it would have you. 125 00:05:52,120 --> 00:05:55,800 Speaker 1: But there's a question of whether you start to on 126 00:05:55,880 --> 00:06:01,359 Speaker 1: the margins shift more into inflation hedges in lieu of 127 00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 1: some of the bond holdings. 128 00:06:03,320 --> 00:06:04,760 Speaker 4: Yeah, at least I think it's a great point. 129 00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:06,880 Speaker 3: I mean, if you look at at the considerations on 130 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:09,560 Speaker 3: commodities when you're in an environment like this, again, we 131 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:14,120 Speaker 3: run relative performance money, and so you're giving up about 132 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:16,720 Speaker 3: thirty five or forty basis points a month if you're 133 00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:19,720 Speaker 3: invested in commodities versus bonds. That's a pretty big hurdle 134 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 3: for an investoral like us to think about. 135 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:25,240 Speaker 4: Now. One of the things that has really not. 136 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:27,920 Speaker 3: Worked, in fact, one of the few dislocations and markets 137 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 3: right now is the petrochemical cycle. If you look at 138 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:33,840 Speaker 3: what's happening with with things like natural gas, which is 139 00:06:33,880 --> 00:06:37,200 Speaker 3: effectively known as the widow maker for investors because it's 140 00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:39,960 Speaker 3: so hard to trade, and also things like oil and 141 00:06:40,040 --> 00:06:42,880 Speaker 3: other other components of petrochemicals, you know you're in an 142 00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:46,919 Speaker 3: environment where the caring cost of being wrong is extremely high. 143 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 3: So we don't think that now is the time to 144 00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:52,040 Speaker 3: necessarily be really bold and take a huge amount of 145 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 3: capital in the commodities. But you can piece into it. Again, 146 00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:59,520 Speaker 3: Golds really work, silvers really work, but industrial metals petro 147 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:02,800 Speaker 3: chemicals have not worked. So well, that could be interesting. Again, 148 00:07:02,839 --> 00:07:05,719 Speaker 3: we'd be very incremental here, especially as you look for 149 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:10,000 Speaker 3: optionality on policy risk coming out later this year. But 150 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 3: again you have to be mindful that carrying costs which 151 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 3: is quite. 152 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:15,240 Speaker 1: High, and that's the reason why some of maybe the 153 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:18,080 Speaker 1: forty percent of fixed income would go toward that, but 154 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:20,080 Speaker 1: not the whole thing when it comes to the sixty 155 00:07:20,120 --> 00:07:23,320 Speaker 1: percent or maybe even higher. If you are bullish on stocks, 156 00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:26,440 Speaker 1: I am wondering how you are cautious at a time 157 00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 1: where the risks are bifurcated in nature. What does that 158 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:33,160 Speaker 1: mean in terms of how you're approaching allocations right now? 159 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 3: There, Yeah, this is a space for you know, we 160 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:39,960 Speaker 3: are actually modestly overweight domestic equities and overweight equities overall. 161 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:43,000 Speaker 3: On our Portflois, we expressed that since late April in 162 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:45,880 Speaker 3: equal weight to S ANDP we were early, which means 163 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 3: we were wrong. In the last couple of months we've 164 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:51,440 Speaker 3: been right, which is really again been a benefit. But 165 00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:53,560 Speaker 3: we think this is an environment least when there's just 166 00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:57,000 Speaker 3: not that much dislocation. Again, since you had the low 167 00:07:57,040 --> 00:07:59,560 Speaker 3: print in the S and P at nine thirty one 168 00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:03,400 Speaker 3: am on August fifth, which just spoke to how aggressive 169 00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 3: the position squaring it had to be. There just has 170 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:08,920 Speaker 3: been such a quick reflectionive move upward across all assets 171 00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:11,560 Speaker 3: that this is about relative value. So again, we like 172 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 3: stocks over bonds, we like equal weight over ag we 173 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:16,960 Speaker 3: like equal weight over munis. But you know, you have 174 00:08:17,040 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 3: to we think kind of pair off as opposed to 175 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:23,080 Speaker 3: looking at at large, deep dislocations that just aren't there 176 00:08:23,080 --> 00:08:23,800 Speaker 3: in the marketplace. 177 00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 4: So we're cautious about taking really bold moves. 178 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,800 Speaker 3: We do think that collecting income is an interesting thing 179 00:08:29,840 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 3: to do for investors, so things like municipal high yield, 180 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 3: things like non agency mortgages, even things like reinsurance and 181 00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:38,280 Speaker 3: closed and funds. That's a good way to pick up 182 00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:41,640 Speaker 3: carry and kind of wait for more specificity without taking 183 00:08:41,720 --> 00:08:43,800 Speaker 3: a ton of directional risk, because there really isn't a 184 00:08:43,800 --> 00:08:47,720 Speaker 3: lot out there from a market dislocation standpoint to pick through. 185 00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:50,840 Speaker 4: Besides, again commodities which just haven't done very well. 186 00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:52,719 Speaker 2: Equal Way has certainly been working just to put a 187 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:54,760 Speaker 2: bow on it all, Eric, we've been asking this question 188 00:08:54,800 --> 00:08:56,800 Speaker 2: a week just to set us out for payros Friday 189 00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:59,679 Speaker 2: this time next week, always just as vulnerable going into 190 00:08:59,720 --> 00:09:02,240 Speaker 2: sept ten to sixth as we work against a walk 191 00:09:02,240 --> 00:09:03,959 Speaker 2: a second or things changed. 192 00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:07,600 Speaker 3: You know, I think things had changed, Jonathan, in the 193 00:09:07,640 --> 00:09:10,679 Speaker 3: sense of again that that the taps on the shoulders 194 00:09:10,400 --> 00:09:13,360 Speaker 3: with the end carried trade positioning, those have already happened. 195 00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:16,840 Speaker 3: Now again, investors have very short memories, and so we're 196 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:19,160 Speaker 3: not you know, naive enough to think that there isn't 197 00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:22,319 Speaker 3: some potential for being off sides. But again to your point, 198 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:25,600 Speaker 3: if we saw something beyond consensus, which I think is 199 00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:28,319 Speaker 3: like for a one sixty one sixty five print, if 200 00:09:28,360 --> 00:09:31,280 Speaker 3: you'd have to see something like sub one ten one hundred, 201 00:09:31,720 --> 00:09:35,400 Speaker 3: we think with also a pretty not sharp rise, well 202 00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:37,640 Speaker 3: it's called a headline unemployment rate of north of four 203 00:09:37,640 --> 00:09:39,559 Speaker 3: and a half or you know, four point four or 204 00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:42,719 Speaker 3: four point five percent, that would signal a little more 205 00:09:42,760 --> 00:09:45,600 Speaker 3: weakness than perhaps is priced in. We don't think that's 206 00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 3: our base case. Our economics team is a little more 207 00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:50,040 Speaker 3: bullish on what the print may look like. But you know, 208 00:09:50,040 --> 00:09:52,640 Speaker 3: I think that with positions squaring a little bit tighter 209 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:56,440 Speaker 3: than where it was back in the August print, you know, 210 00:09:56,480 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 3: we're not as vulnerable, but it would take we think, 211 00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:01,080 Speaker 3: a pretty pretty significant downside surprise. 212 00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:03,080 Speaker 4: The drive markets much lower. 213 00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:05,440 Speaker 2: That would be bad news, and that would be bad news. 214 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:05,800 Speaker 4: Eric. 215 00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:07,960 Speaker 2: Thank you, sir Eric Friedman of US Bank. Have a 216 00:10:07,960 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 2: good long weekend. Here's the latest, A little under two 217 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,280 Speaker 2: hours away from a fresh read on the US economy 218 00:10:23,320 --> 00:10:26,040 Speaker 2: with core PCE and personal income and spending data due 219 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:28,640 Speaker 2: at eight thirty Eastern time. Claudia Salm of New Century 220 00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:31,520 Speaker 2: Advisors writing, none of our output metrics point to a 221 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:34,440 Speaker 2: growth scare, and none argue against the FED rate cut either. 222 00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:37,520 Speaker 2: With the expansion of the labor supply and higher productivity growth, 223 00:10:37,640 --> 00:10:41,040 Speaker 2: recent growth has not shown signs of an overheating economy. 224 00:10:41,280 --> 00:10:44,040 Speaker 2: The soft landing remains the base case. A good friend 225 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 2: of this program, good friend of us, Claudia joined us 226 00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:48,600 Speaker 2: now for more. Claudia, welcome back to the program. We 227 00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:51,079 Speaker 2: started this morning in this hour with this quote, and 228 00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:52,400 Speaker 2: I wanted to share it with you. It came from 229 00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:56,680 Speaker 2: the Dollar General CEO on low income sharpers inflations continue 230 00:10:56,679 --> 00:10:59,520 Speaker 2: to negatively impact these households, with more than sixty percent 231 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 2: claiming they've had to sacrifice some purchasing basic necessities. It's 232 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:06,680 Speaker 2: difficult to really get a complete read of what's happening 233 00:11:06,679 --> 00:11:08,719 Speaker 2: with the consumer right now. Claudia, if you'll rask and 234 00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:11,360 Speaker 2: I'll ask you, how would you characterize the overall situation 235 00:11:11,480 --> 00:11:16,000 Speaker 2: for consumption and the consumer in America? 236 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:19,640 Speaker 5: So I think this is what is always difficult with 237 00:11:19,880 --> 00:11:23,560 Speaker 5: us consumers. We have a population that has very different, 238 00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:28,000 Speaker 5: very different income and wealth and needs. And it absolutely 239 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:30,680 Speaker 5: makes sense that right now we are years into inflation 240 00:11:30,800 --> 00:11:34,120 Speaker 5: that has been higher than normal, and it's going to 241 00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:37,719 Speaker 5: hit people at the bottom hardest. So that's why it's 242 00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:41,040 Speaker 5: so important in particular to keep the expansion going, to 243 00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:44,000 Speaker 5: get the labor market, have the hiring rates, the jobs there. 244 00:11:44,080 --> 00:11:47,960 Speaker 5: These are the consumers that absolutely depend on their paychecks 245 00:11:48,400 --> 00:11:51,120 Speaker 5: to make things work. So overall the picture is good, 246 00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:53,320 Speaker 5: but that does not mean that it's good enough, and 247 00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:56,120 Speaker 5: it doesn't mean that it stays that way, particularly for 248 00:11:56,240 --> 00:11:57,959 Speaker 5: certain groups that are under stress like that. 249 00:11:58,160 --> 00:11:59,880 Speaker 2: I know. That's why one of the reasons why you 250 00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:02,120 Speaker 2: happy with the shift from cham and Pale in the 251 00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:05,000 Speaker 2: speech just last week. A question we've explored through this 252 00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:07,240 Speaker 2: week is how much daylight that might be between him 253 00:12:07,559 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 2: and other members of the committee. Do you see this 254 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:12,360 Speaker 2: whole committee moving in the same direction, or you're starting 255 00:12:12,400 --> 00:12:15,079 Speaker 2: to see some division, some split, some cracks. 256 00:12:16,559 --> 00:12:20,920 Speaker 5: It's important for there to be differences of opinion and 257 00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:23,360 Speaker 5: a robust and a bit among the committee. We should 258 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:26,040 Speaker 5: be most worried when they're all singing in the same song, right, Like, 259 00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:29,400 Speaker 5: this is a really complicated question. Are we moving in 260 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:32,680 Speaker 5: the direction the chair Powell laid out? Absolutely? And I 261 00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:34,640 Speaker 5: think you can even see that in the minutes from 262 00:12:34,679 --> 00:12:37,880 Speaker 5: the last meeting before we started, before we got the 263 00:12:37,960 --> 00:12:41,719 Speaker 5: July employment data that was so disconcerting. So I think 264 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:44,560 Speaker 5: that's where we're headed. I expect we'll continue to get 265 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:45,720 Speaker 5: good news on inflation. 266 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:46,520 Speaker 1: That's important. 267 00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 5: That's why interest rates are high is to help get 268 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 5: inflation down. We're making a lot of progress there, which 269 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:56,480 Speaker 5: means that can really pay attention to the slowing in 270 00:12:56,559 --> 00:13:00,240 Speaker 5: the labor market and with maximum employment, what you want 271 00:13:00,360 --> 00:13:03,880 Speaker 5: is the most employment possible without creating inflation. If we 272 00:13:03,920 --> 00:13:06,760 Speaker 5: are making progress on the inflation check, they can ease 273 00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:08,880 Speaker 5: up some on the interest rates, and they should ease 274 00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:12,040 Speaker 5: up some on the interest rates so that the labor 275 00:13:12,080 --> 00:13:14,000 Speaker 5: market can kind of get its footing back and bring 276 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:16,680 Speaker 5: some more of these workers back back online. 277 00:13:16,840 --> 00:13:19,160 Speaker 1: Claudia said, get its footing back. Where do we have 278 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 1: a sense that the labor market is losing its footing. 279 00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 5: At this point when you see the job games have slowed. 280 00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:31,320 Speaker 5: Most worrisome is the fact that the hiring rate so 281 00:13:31,400 --> 00:13:33,880 Speaker 5: for people who are coming into the labor force, whether 282 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:36,880 Speaker 5: it's coming out of schooling in their first job or 283 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:39,880 Speaker 5: or you know that we have a larger immigrant workforce, 284 00:13:39,920 --> 00:13:42,959 Speaker 5: at this point, it is harder for them to find jobs. 285 00:13:42,960 --> 00:13:45,640 Speaker 5: And there's a real disconnect between you know, what the 286 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 5: hiring rates look like, which are much lower than just 287 00:13:49,120 --> 00:13:50,840 Speaker 5: you know, a couple of years ago, and frankly go 288 00:13:50,920 --> 00:13:54,160 Speaker 5: back to kind of twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen, that wasn't 289 00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:57,560 Speaker 5: a great labor market. So we need people coming in 290 00:13:57,679 --> 00:14:00,520 Speaker 5: to bring their talents. And it's not just about the fact, yes, 291 00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:03,080 Speaker 5: layoff rates or at all time lows that is that 292 00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,320 Speaker 5: is excellent. Let's get hiring rates up to all time 293 00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:09,359 Speaker 5: highs again. So that's I think we've got some disconnect 294 00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:12,120 Speaker 5: in terms of who is really getting hit in terms 295 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:16,240 Speaker 5: of you know, opportunities, and we just you know, kind 296 00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:18,040 Speaker 5: of even it out. We're still coming out of an 297 00:14:18,040 --> 00:14:21,600 Speaker 5: adjustment and there's no reason for further cooling in the 298 00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:23,920 Speaker 5: labor market. We don't need it to get inflation down 299 00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:26,960 Speaker 5: and it's a real loss in terms of our you know, 300 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 5: what we can do as an economy if we have 301 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 5: people on the sidelines. 302 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:33,440 Speaker 1: Claudia, you created the rule that so many people have 303 00:14:33,600 --> 00:14:36,920 Speaker 1: been citing over the past few months from the Fed 304 00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:40,200 Speaker 1: and Beyond the sum rule, which talks about zero point 305 00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:43,600 Speaker 1: five percentage point increase in the unemployment rate over a 306 00:14:43,640 --> 00:14:46,520 Speaker 1: six month period of time. We have seen that. What 307 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:49,960 Speaker 1: would give you much more pause in this upcoming report 308 00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:53,360 Speaker 1: that we get next Friday, that maybe this is really 309 00:14:53,360 --> 00:14:56,440 Speaker 1: truly a much more quickly deteriorating labor market than we 310 00:14:56,480 --> 00:14:59,160 Speaker 1: otherwise had thought. 311 00:15:00,120 --> 00:15:02,160 Speaker 5: Is true. You one's got to take big picture view. 312 00:15:02,320 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 5: A lot of the information we've gotten outside of the 313 00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:07,840 Speaker 5: labor market looks pretty solid, right, So there's no one 314 00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:10,840 Speaker 5: report that's going to be game changing in terms of 315 00:15:10,840 --> 00:15:14,920 Speaker 5: how we think. Clearly, we're looking for the unemployment rate 316 00:15:14,960 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 5: to maybe come back a little bit. Some of that 317 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:19,400 Speaker 5: was a temporary layoffs that you know, a blip in it. 318 00:15:19,880 --> 00:15:23,440 Speaker 5: We want to see the payroll numbers stabilize things that 319 00:15:23,560 --> 00:15:27,200 Speaker 5: look worse or we don't unwind some mutually is going 320 00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 5: to give pause, but really it's watching this. We're looking 321 00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:33,440 Speaker 5: at trends we're looking at contours. There's no magic number 322 00:15:33,480 --> 00:15:37,320 Speaker 5: here with this Sam rule to try to get a 323 00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 5: sense of it really is about the direction, and we 324 00:15:41,560 --> 00:15:45,720 Speaker 5: should expect to see over the next several months, probably 325 00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:49,680 Speaker 5: still some more softening in the labor market. Just because 326 00:15:50,600 --> 00:15:54,760 Speaker 5: Chair Pale or the Fed gets going doesn't mean everything 327 00:15:54,960 --> 00:15:57,040 Speaker 5: changes on a dime, right, Like we really do have 328 00:15:57,120 --> 00:16:00,000 Speaker 5: to see policy change, and then you know understand by 329 00:16:00,240 --> 00:16:02,600 Speaker 5: how things are evolving in the labor market, and you 330 00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:05,640 Speaker 5: know the confidence of businesses to hire is an important 331 00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:06,520 Speaker 5: piece of it as well. 332 00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:08,640 Speaker 2: Claudia, were always lucky to catch up with you. Thanks 333 00:16:08,680 --> 00:16:11,000 Speaker 2: for your time this morning. Clodia Sam of New Century 334 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 2: Advisors on the labor market, on the consumer and a 335 00:16:23,240 --> 00:16:28,080 Speaker 2: housing Tausei Advisory Group, maintaining and outperform rating following learnings, 336 00:16:28,320 --> 00:16:31,440 Speaker 2: noting solid results and saying a reduced outlook comes there's 337 00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:34,200 Speaker 2: no surprise against moderated expectations. Dan and joins us now 338 00:16:34,200 --> 00:16:35,880 Speaker 2: for more. Good morning to you, Good morning, Thank you 339 00:16:35,920 --> 00:16:38,400 Speaker 2: for busy. How many companies under your coverage you've reported 340 00:16:38,400 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 2: this week? 341 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:41,160 Speaker 6: We had twenty two companies this week. Don't tell me 342 00:16:41,200 --> 00:16:44,160 Speaker 6: about a slow week this week. It was anything but slow. 343 00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:46,080 Speaker 6: Because we now have the pulse of the consumer. 344 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:48,280 Speaker 2: Let's pick up on that word slow. How slow are 345 00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 2: things things have slowed down. 346 00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:52,080 Speaker 6: You want to call it discerning, you want to call 347 00:16:52,120 --> 00:16:54,800 Speaker 6: it more cautious, whatever it may be. July was a 348 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:57,720 Speaker 6: week month. August is definitely a little bit better. But 349 00:16:57,760 --> 00:16:59,680 Speaker 6: the planning for the back half of the year has 350 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:02,800 Speaker 6: taken tick down. And you look at the fourth quarter 351 00:17:02,800 --> 00:17:06,200 Speaker 6: where you have five fewer days between Thanksgiving and Christmas. 352 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:09,960 Speaker 6: Retailers have to plan cautiously. Some have called out, is 353 00:17:10,000 --> 00:17:12,720 Speaker 6: that a three percent hit to sales in the fourth 354 00:17:12,800 --> 00:17:15,399 Speaker 6: quarter because of those fewer days? It easily could be. 355 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:17,600 Speaker 1: So this is the confusion that I'm having. You had 356 00:17:17,680 --> 00:17:20,040 Speaker 1: personal consumption that was revised up in the second quarter. 357 00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:22,919 Speaker 1: You have certain companies that are doing just fine. You 358 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:27,320 Speaker 1: see travel that still is going pretty strong. Where are 359 00:17:27,320 --> 00:17:28,160 Speaker 1: we seeing. 360 00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:30,880 Speaker 6: The bulk of this weakness in a couple places? Look 361 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:34,000 Speaker 6: what you've seen with luxury spending. Luxury spending is slowed. 362 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:37,160 Speaker 6: You're not getting the international tourists come over. You're looking 363 00:17:37,240 --> 00:17:40,439 Speaker 6: at discretionary spending in the department stores. Look at some 364 00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:44,119 Speaker 6: of the Macy's numbers, the Dillard's numbers. They're weaker than expected. 365 00:17:44,320 --> 00:17:47,720 Speaker 6: Look at urban outfitters. You have consumers that are intentionally 366 00:17:47,760 --> 00:17:52,000 Speaker 6: spending and innovation is driving demand. It's not everyone. Look 367 00:17:52,000 --> 00:17:55,119 Speaker 6: at Birkenstock, they had very good results, double digit increases. 368 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 6: Take a look at Abercrombie. The Hollister accelerated. You're still 369 00:17:58,880 --> 00:18:02,879 Speaker 6: seeing strong double gains at the Abercrombie brand. Look at 370 00:18:02,920 --> 00:18:07,479 Speaker 6: footwear deckers on running. You've had innovation and newness drive demand. 371 00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:10,840 Speaker 6: But look what you've also had. The off pricers outperformed 372 00:18:11,080 --> 00:18:14,639 Speaker 6: four percent comps at TJX and ross five percent comps 373 00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:18,280 Speaker 6: at Burlington. Look at Walmart and target the consumers searching 374 00:18:18,320 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 6: for value because they don't have the stimulus dollars they 375 00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:22,000 Speaker 6: had a couple of years ago. 376 00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:24,040 Speaker 1: This might be a bridge too far, but is this 377 00:18:24,119 --> 00:18:27,080 Speaker 1: a lot of people who are higher income searching for 378 00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:32,480 Speaker 1: more value but the lower income families still actually really struggling. 379 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:33,560 Speaker 2: In other words, are. 380 00:18:33,400 --> 00:18:36,040 Speaker 1: We getting a signal from the fact that off price 381 00:18:36,440 --> 00:18:38,879 Speaker 1: places are doing well, but the dollar generals of the 382 00:18:38,920 --> 00:18:41,240 Speaker 1: world are flat out of bax and can't get a break. 383 00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 6: And it's a little bit of everyone. I mean, you 384 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:44,960 Speaker 6: take a look at the dollar generals, but look who's 385 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:47,960 Speaker 6: taking share. The Walmart's, the Targets, the Ross, the TJ's, 386 00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:50,879 Speaker 6: the Burlington, they all did well. Some of the dollar 387 00:18:50,920 --> 00:18:52,920 Speaker 6: stores they're cutting back on their raid and new store 388 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:56,840 Speaker 6: openings five below being one of them, so it's more competitive. 389 00:18:57,040 --> 00:18:59,760 Speaker 6: You take a look yesterday Old Navy and that's search 390 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 6: for value. It definitely feels what you mentioned. Every income 391 00:19:03,640 --> 00:19:06,719 Speaker 6: level has turned the needle up a little bit un 392 00:19:06,720 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 6: searching for more value. 393 00:19:08,040 --> 00:19:10,320 Speaker 2: Let's get alulu, why is it up in the pre market? 394 00:19:10,400 --> 00:19:11,119 Speaker 2: Why is it running? 395 00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:13,919 Speaker 6: The reason why because when you take a look at 396 00:19:13,960 --> 00:19:17,000 Speaker 6: the reset guidance, the stock's already been weak. It's taken 397 00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:20,359 Speaker 6: into account this already, and frankly, the guidance they gave 398 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:23,440 Speaker 6: wasn't worse than some of the whisper numbers out there. 399 00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 2: So it's beatable, which is what we've heard from other 400 00:19:25,560 --> 00:19:28,320 Speaker 2: analysts as well. Let's talk about problems. Where are they 401 00:19:28,359 --> 00:19:31,000 Speaker 2: having problems? Composition, execution? What is it? 402 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:33,880 Speaker 6: It's the women's business. It is definitely a little bit 403 00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:37,080 Speaker 6: of the execution of it. The newness in the product 404 00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:39,359 Speaker 6: that's come out, and you can call newness in terms 405 00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:43,960 Speaker 6: of colors, it's colors, prints, patterns. They need more of 406 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:47,000 Speaker 6: that it's going to come in slowly. They redid the 407 00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:50,159 Speaker 6: merchandising structure, and it sounds like they'll be able to 408 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:54,440 Speaker 6: react faster and drive more newness into the assortment. 409 00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:56,919 Speaker 1: How low has the barrier to entry gotten? I mean 410 00:19:56,960 --> 00:19:59,720 Speaker 1: we talk about competitors, we talk about Aloe or a 411 00:19:59,800 --> 00:20:01,480 Speaker 1: Low or however you want to pronounce it. You've got 412 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:03,840 Speaker 1: beyond Yoga, You've got Vori, You've got some of these 413 00:20:03,880 --> 00:20:06,639 Speaker 1: other brands that have more of the air of cool, 414 00:20:07,040 --> 00:20:10,640 Speaker 1: and Lululemma no longer does. It's very sort of characterized 415 00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:13,359 Speaker 1: in social society. Is like what it is, It's tight, 416 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:17,320 Speaker 1: it's a certain person, et cetera. Is this getting easier 417 00:20:17,480 --> 00:20:19,560 Speaker 1: in terms of disruption that we're seeing more broadly. 418 00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:22,120 Speaker 6: I think there's always been competition. I think that all 419 00:20:22,160 --> 00:20:25,560 Speaker 6: the competitors, everyone has their own personality, so to speak. 420 00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:28,600 Speaker 6: I think of Alo as fashionable, I think of Lulu 421 00:20:28,600 --> 00:20:33,240 Speaker 6: as technical functionality. I think as Sweaty Betty as affordable. 422 00:20:33,600 --> 00:20:36,359 Speaker 6: So each of them has their own pulse, and you 423 00:20:36,600 --> 00:20:39,240 Speaker 6: have to be able to cater to who stay in 424 00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 6: your lane and cater to it. The fact that Lulu 425 00:20:41,640 --> 00:20:44,879 Speaker 6: didn't have that newness in women's impacted their ability to 426 00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:45,720 Speaker 6: drive conversion. 427 00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:48,680 Speaker 1: There's is also a question going forward of how much 428 00:20:48,760 --> 00:20:51,840 Speaker 1: is the weakness something that's just beginning at a time 429 00:20:52,119 --> 00:20:54,280 Speaker 1: when we just got a note from Andrew Hollenhorst, a 430 00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:57,560 Speaker 1: Vergity group talking about how he expects the savings rate 431 00:20:57,600 --> 00:20:59,840 Speaker 1: to fall to an all time low. That essentially people 432 00:20:59,840 --> 00:21:02,919 Speaker 1: are spending what they've got left. They've already spent up 433 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:05,840 Speaker 1: the pandemic savings. How much do you expect this to 434 00:21:05,840 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 1: be the last gass rather than the weakest spot. 435 00:21:08,680 --> 00:21:10,880 Speaker 6: I don't think it's necessarily the last gasp. I think 436 00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:13,800 Speaker 6: that their customer has money, it's where they're going to 437 00:21:13,800 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 6: spend that money. Look at the experience versus goods element 438 00:21:17,160 --> 00:21:19,480 Speaker 6: that's out there, the other thing that you have changing 439 00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:22,400 Speaker 6: out there. Look at other categories that have underperformed. Look 440 00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:25,560 Speaker 6: at jewelry. Jewelry has been a weak performer. So they'll 441 00:21:25,560 --> 00:21:27,760 Speaker 6: go there. But they have to see something they don't 442 00:21:27,760 --> 00:21:28,760 Speaker 6: have in the closet already. 443 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:30,520 Speaker 2: You know, I think of when I think of Lulu 444 00:21:30,760 --> 00:21:34,280 Speaker 2: Midtown uniform, I don't think a technical performance at all. 445 00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:36,440 Speaker 2: I feel like that dined in the pandemic, didn't it. 446 00:21:37,359 --> 00:21:39,760 Speaker 6: No, I think that people are basically still wearing technical 447 00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:43,040 Speaker 6: and functional. I think that some of Lulu's merchandise, particularly 448 00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:46,200 Speaker 6: for men that ABC panned, that's showing up to work 449 00:21:46,240 --> 00:21:46,680 Speaker 6: every day. 450 00:21:47,359 --> 00:21:48,320 Speaker 1: That was my point. 451 00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:49,320 Speaker 2: That was exactly it. 452 00:21:49,400 --> 00:21:53,359 Speaker 1: You picture the midtown uniform, you picture f leisure during 453 00:21:53,400 --> 00:21:57,360 Speaker 1: the pandemic. You don't picture you know, incredibly, you don't 454 00:21:57,359 --> 00:21:58,240 Speaker 1: picture Alvarez. 455 00:21:58,359 --> 00:22:00,000 Speaker 2: I sense you disagreed with it, but I just feel 456 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:02,080 Speaker 2: like there's been a real brand hit over the last 457 00:22:02,320 --> 00:22:05,520 Speaker 2: few years that aspirational glosses sort of is off. 458 00:22:05,640 --> 00:22:08,960 Speaker 6: There's been more competition, They've gotten to a bigger base, 459 00:22:09,240 --> 00:22:10,800 Speaker 6: so it requires more to. 460 00:22:10,800 --> 00:22:13,159 Speaker 2: Beat the bigger base. Got it, Danni, it's going to 461 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:14,359 Speaker 2: see you. Thank good to see you too, one of 462 00:22:14,400 --> 00:22:16,040 Speaker 2: the best I know. Just incredibly busy week for you, 463 00:22:16,119 --> 00:22:18,560 Speaker 2: so thank you. Thanks for dropping by any of TAOSI 464 00:22:18,600 --> 00:22:22,960 Speaker 2: Advisory Group. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you 465 00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:26,640 Speaker 2: the best in markets, economics, angio politics. You can watch 466 00:22:26,640 --> 00:22:29,400 Speaker 2: the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six 467 00:22:29,440 --> 00:22:33,040 Speaker 2: am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, 468 00:22:33,320 --> 00:22:36,159 Speaker 2: Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always on 469 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:38,600 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business Out