WEBVTT - Tech News: Elon Musk is Buying Twitter

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are Yet, it's time for the

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, April twenty six, two thousand, twenty two.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And after all the Twitter polls, the poison pills, and

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the posturing, that's a lot of alliteration, Elon Musk and

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's board of directors have come to an agreement for

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Musk to purchase Twitter. Now that deal isn't done yet.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Shareholders have to agree on the acquisition and it also

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>has to pass regulatory approval. But that being said, I

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>think the general consensus is that there aren't gonna be

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>any serious roadblocks in the way of this deal and

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it will in fact go through. It's a heck of

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a story. I anticipate this is going to be one

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of the really big stories when folks do retrospectives on

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most important tech news of two. Elon

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Musk has had a let's say controversial time on Twitter,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>using a platform to post stuff that got him into

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>serious hot water with the SEC something that he protests

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and says was unmerited um. Musk has also had a

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a dodgy past when it comes to following regulations,

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's been known to use Twitter to promote certain cryptocurrencies,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>which nearly always has had a massive effect and frequently

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a short term effect on that cryptocurrency's value, which has

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>led some to accuse Musk of using his position to

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>try and pump and then dump crypto in an effort

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a tidy profit at the expense of marks. Now,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Musk has said he plans on overseeing some really big

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>changes at Twitter, including authenticating every human on the platform

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and eliminating bots. He has also repeatedly called for Twitter

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a better steward of free speech, which has

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>led some to think that Musk might reverse some big

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions like the lifelong ban on former President Donald Trump,

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and this has a lot of people concerned that Twitter's

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>trend toward track cracking down on a misinformation and disinformation

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>campaigns could be reversed. Free speech is a pretty tricky

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>thing too, because you know, even the United States has

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>limits on free speech. It's not absolute. For example, the

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>United States Supreme Court has determined on numerous occasions that

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>free speech does have boundaries, like libel and slander are

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>two of those, so libel and slander don't count as

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>free speech, and so there's concerned that Musk's interpretation of

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>free speech might allow for rampant abuse on the platform.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Musk has said that there will still be content moderation

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and that extreme tweets like those calling for physical violence

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>against people, will not be allowed, so it sounds like

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there will be limitations there. He's also indicated that he

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>intends Twitter to work within the laws of various countries,

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's not He's not advocating that Twitter flaunt uh

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>laws around the world, and that could also mean that,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking about free speech with limitations on

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter as well as elsewhere. So a lot of people

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are kind of confused about this about where it's going

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to go. Honestly, it's far too early to say because

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not there yet. But a lot of people have

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>said they are leaving the platform. Much fewer are actually leaving,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people are saying that's it, I'm moving,

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and then they stay where they are, which you know

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that happens every time we see a massive change in leadership,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking about a social platform or a country. Uh.

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey, one of the co founders and the formers,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the EO of Twitter, says that Musk is the quote

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>singular solution I trust end quote. So there's definitely debate

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not Musk taking over Twitter is a

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>good or bad thing. Now. I anticipate that I will

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>maintain my tech stuff hsw Twitter feed for this show,

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but I have already sunset it, although not deactivated my

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>personal account. By sunset, I just mean I logged out. Uh.

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I'm not deleting that account isn't because

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried I'm gonna miss it. Instead, it's that I

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to surrender my Twitter handle and have someone

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>else take it over and then potentially post a lot

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of nasty stuff that could, you know, for for a

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>casual follower, make them think that it was me. I

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want that to ever happen. Uh. Now, for the record,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm really important enough for anyone to

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>actually care about doing that, but I feel as a

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>verified user it's probably for the best that I don't

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>open up that possibility anyway. I also want to say

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to all of you that staying or leaving Twitter is

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a personal choice. If you love Twitter and you don't

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>want to go and it's useful to you, those are

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>all legitimate reasons, and I feel you should feel fine

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about staying on Twitter. That you know, I'm not my

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>own choice doesn't reflect my opinion of how other people operate.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you do feel uneasy and you want a skedaddle,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>that's fine too. Even if it's just temporary, that's fine.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't let anyone dictate to you what you should or

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 1>should not do. For me, this is something I feel

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I needed to do, both for myself as it can

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on my mental well being, and also

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because I genuinely feel that I won't be doing much

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>good on Twitter. Arguably I haven't done much good up

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to this point, and I'm sure we'll have plenty more

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>stories about this as time goes on. And that's enough

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for now, I think. But the Twitter conversation is absolutely

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>dominating the tech news space right now. It's lucky that

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I was able to find a few other stories that

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>we can touch on to. One is that Netflix employee

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>morale is taking a serious hit. Now. This should come

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>as no real surprise last week, Netflix began a serious

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>slide in the stock market after reporting that the company

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>had a net loss of two hundred thousand subscribers around

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the world in the first quarter of two thousand twenty two.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>For many at Netflix, this slide has had a massive

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>personal impact, particularly people who are like in the executive level,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>folks who own shares and Netflix. Because Netflix, like a

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of tech companies, has rewarded employees with compensation in

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the form of shares. Well, folks who have shares are

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing their wealth decline every time the stock price takes

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>another hit, so it's like you're losing money working for

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the company. The general caution that a lot of people

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>feel about Netflix after its first decline since it launched.

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, remember the earnings call we heard where we

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>found out about the two decline that was the first

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>decline in the history of Netflix. But apparently the same

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>concern that we're seeing outside Netflix is prevalent within the

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>ranks of Netflix itself. A lot of people are reportedly

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>considering leaving the company before things get worse, particularly again

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at the executive and management levels. This is according to

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg by the Way, which published an article about the

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>whole ordeal. I still personally find this story a bit perplexing.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to reconcile that a company that

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>has been as monumentally successful as Netflix could be so

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>fragile that it's first really bad quarter sends the message

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that the empire is on shaky ground. And here's the

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that really wrinkles my brain. As Troy would say,

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if enough people buy in to that perspective that Netflix

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is in really serious trouble, it can become a self

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.119
<v Speaker 1>fulfilling prophecy. Now, all that being said, it is clear

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are huge challenges for Netflix and for other

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>streaming platforms. There's a limit to the audience out there.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Right Even if you are able to sign up everyone

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>who is interested, you eventually do stop getting new subscribers

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's no one to to sign up. And that's

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>before you start taking into consideration the incredible competition in

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the space, because there's so many different streaming platforms out

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>there now, and you know, obviously we're gonna probably see

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>more before we start to see things shake out. In

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the long run, I don't think all of those streaming

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>services are going to survive. Some of them will end

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>up getting folded into others. Uh, or they might end

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up changing hands. We'll see. But I always assume Netflix

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>would be one of the bedrock streaming services that would

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>be around, and and it really established itself so in

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>such a dominant position so early. Uh. But also it's

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>too early to suggest that the company is really at

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the end. This could be a blip

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in Netflix's history, a serious one, but one that the

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>company fully recovers from. We just have to wait and see.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The Verge reports that Apple has retained the services of

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a law firm called Littler Mendelssohn, widely known as a

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>union busting law firm. This is the same firm that

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks hired in that company's efforts to counteract various union

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pushes throughout its stores, and this comes on the heels

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of an Atlanta Apple stores recent successful push to secure

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>enough employee signatures to warrant a union election. The flagship

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple store in New York City is also in the

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>process of gathering signatures in order to have the same

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of vote. And I am left to wonder if

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the hiring of law firms like this one ultimately ends

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>up fueling the resolve of employees rather than discourages them.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to say from the outside. I

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have an inside perspective of these things. It may

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>well be that the efforts to organize our succeeding despite

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>heavy opposition, rather than becoming energized by companies efforts to

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>squash them. I honestly can't tell. But again, it's another

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>indication that employees in the tech sector are really pushing

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>back against the established status quo. We've got several more

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>stories to go over before we get to those. Let's

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. We're back and over in Japan.

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Apple is facing another battle, as is Google. Government report

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in Japan named Apple and Google as essentially a duopoly

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the smartphone operating system market, and

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that's totally true. Google is way in the lead worldwide.

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Google has about a seventy percent of the smartphone operating

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>system market share according to stat Counter. Apple is at

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a healthy twenty seven point five seven, which means that

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>together Apple and and Google or you know, iOS and Android,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>make up about percent of the smartphone operating system market.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Kind Of hard to argue against the duopoly when you

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>have a figure like that. The government report expressed concern

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that this arrangement, this du woppoly creates an unfair marketplace

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for app developers and consumers alike, pointing out that it

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is common practice for Android phones to come pre installed

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with say the Chrome browser, or for Apple to favor Safari,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and the report argues that this stifles competition from other

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>browsers and and that it is actively discouraging users from

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>installing other browsers besides the ones that come pre installed

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on the operating system. Further, the report argues that developers

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are forced into ecosystems in order to have their work

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>accessible by people who use these smartphones, and that Apple

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and Google should allow developers and users to choose alternative

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>app stores from the official ones on the platform. So,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you should be able to go to

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>other stores besides the Apple App Store and download apps

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>for your iPhone. Now, this is pretty much the opposite

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of Apple's market strategy, and unsurprisingly, the company has protested

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the report, arguing that Apple faces fierce competition in every arena.

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And it remains to be seen what this report will

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>actually lead to in Japan, but it marks another spot

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world where the big companies like Apple and

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Google are starting to face resistance from regulators, like serious resistance.

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've got another story about the shaky world of

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>n f t s. All right, So quick reminder, and

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>n f T is a non fungible token, which really

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>means it's a digital seartificate showing ownership of some sort

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of digital asset, and it is tracked on a blockchain

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of some sort so that there is a clear uh

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>chain of transactions so you can trace who owned it

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>at what point and who currently owns that digital asset.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>As far as what that asset is, it could be

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a line of code, it could be a piece of

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>digital art, it could be an item within a video game,

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>or pretty much anything else that's digital. And n f

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>t s have been put through the wringer after a

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>chaotic hype cycle that had its fair share of speculation, scams,

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and other shenanigans, and The Verge reports that a hacker

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>has managed to steal n f t s, estimated to

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be worth millions of dollars, using one really tricky method

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and one super easy method. Now, the tricky part was

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that the hacker was able to gain access to the

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>official Instagram account for the board Ape Yacht Club or

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>b A y C. That's one of the entities that

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is famed for minting n f T s of digital art,

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and folks have been speculating ridiculous amounts of money on

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>these pieces of art like this is the kind of

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff that got people a bit wary of n f

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>T s in the first place, when they look at

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the art and they say, wait, how much money are

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>people spending for a digital certificate showing ownership of this thing?

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, we actually don't know how the hacker managed

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to get access of that Instagram account. As of the

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>recording of this podcast, the b A y C says

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that it had activated two factor authentication on its Instagram account,

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so it should have been impossible for anyone not in

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>possession of whatever that second factor was to be able

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to get access to the account. Maybe it was an

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>inside job, but the hacker then used the official account

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to send out a fishing link that, if followed, would

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>prompt n f T holders to interact with that link,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and the link would lead the hacker to joint crypto

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>tokens right out of those users wallets. So, in other words,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>folks got a link from what they assumed to be

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a trusted source. They got it from the official b

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>A y C Instagram account, which should be trustworthy, and

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they ended up getting robbed because of that. Now, the

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>hacker convinced folks to follow follow the fishing link by

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>leaning on one of the most reliable techniques in the

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>history of humans, which is counting on greed. So the

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>link proclaimed to be an air drop of tokens, and

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>if folks joined and they connected their wallets to the link,

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they were supposedly going to be showered with what amounts

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to be free money, really free digital assets which could

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>later be sold or auctioned off for money, and folks

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>love the idea of free money, so there were a

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of takers. Open C famous crypto exchange, has subsequently

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>banned the hackers wallet address on that platform, but it

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is still visible on other platforms. No word yet on

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>how or if those who are affected by this theft

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>will be compensated. The Register reports that the Department of

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security, after initiating a hack DHS program in which

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the department invited hackers to look for vulnerabilities and exploits

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the homeland securities systems, discovered that its systems are

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>far from secure. The four fifty security researchers who took

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>part in this event uncovered one hundred twenty two vulnerabilities,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>seven of which they deemed to be critical. That's pretty

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>darned bad, but it really illustrates how these events are

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>critical for organizations, government or otherwise offering bug bounties. That

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is a payment to people who uncover and subsequently report

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>vulnerabilities and systems. That gives organizations a chance to patch

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>those holes and prevent actual black hat hackers from exploiting

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:12.479
<v Speaker 1>those vulnerabilities. I find it, frankly a little scary that

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a department that has, let's face it, a checkered past,

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>had so many critical vulnerabilities and its various systems, But

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I am glad that the department is taking steps to

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>address that in a responsible way. Penetration testing is a

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty big deal, and I might need to get my

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>friend Shannon Morris back on the show to talk about

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>how that process typically works. She's an expert in that

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>field and I am not. The White House has urged

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Congress to pass legislation that would allow more law enforcement

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>agencies in the United States access to drone tracking systems Now,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, this isn't about those agencies operating drones

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to track citizens or identify suspects. Instead,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this is about giving those agencies the ability to detect

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and track the drones themselves, presumably in an effort to

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>counteract crime and terrorism efforts that rely on drone technology. Now,

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this is not yet a law. It's just a suggestion

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to Congress, and it marks the continuation of the U.

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>S government's increased concern about drones and drone operation. One

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>story that I missed in one was the f a

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a S new drone rules that require any new drones

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>sold in the United States to broadcast the drone operators

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>physical location. And that kind of makes sense in some scenarios,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like say there's a person who's operating a drone that's

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>in a restricted area which could pose as a threat.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Even if the person didn't intend to do that, it

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>could be critically important to track that person down and

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to stop that person or to you know,

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>tell that person what's going on so that they can

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>move the drown out of the restricted area, because drones

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>could pose a threat to things like aircraft, for example. However,

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this capability The idea of being able to track an

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>operator's physical location also has some troubling consequences. For instance,

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>during the Black Lives Matter protests in some folks were

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>using drones to keep an eye on police activity, and

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't take much of a stretch of the imagination

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to assume that a law enforcement agency that was under

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>citizens surveillance might use the drones broadcasting of the operator's

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>physical location to track down and stop that operator. So

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it really does go both ways here, and it also

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>raises the point that drone tracking technology now is effectively

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>operator tracking technology, right if you're talking about a drone

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that was purchased legally in the United States after this

0:19:54.359 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>f a A rule came into effect, then you could say, well, yeah,

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's important to track the drones, but we also have

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to remember that this could be abused so that police

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>could track the operators. It's not even necessarily about the

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>technology in that respect. It's more again a kind of

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>citizen surveillance. So there are definitely some you know, dark

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>consequences to this as well. A UK watchdog called the

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Competition and Markets Authority may soon have some new powers

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to holding companies accountable for fake reviews

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>posted on sites websites, So we're talking about user generated

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>reviews for the most part, and the practice of certain

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>entities like shady product companies or sometimes the PR firms

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>hired to promote those products of either posting directly or

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>hiring people to post positive fake reviews in an effort

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to market their goods. UH. The proposals in the UK

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>suggest making it quote clearly illegal end quote to hire

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>someone to write or host fake reviews, and if found guilty,

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the c m A could find the responsible party, presumably

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>either the site that's hosting the reviews or the people

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>who are hiring people to post fake reviews up to

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of their global turnover. This will create a

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>new responsibility for sites that host reviews, namely that they

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>need to have practices in place to be reasonably certain

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that the reviews posted on the site are legitimate. So presumably,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>if a website shows that it has taken reasonable action

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to guard against fake reviews, the c m A won't

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>levy finds on that site should some fake reviews slip through. UM,

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that there's going to be uh a grace

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>period where if a site is alerted to a fake review,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it has the opportunity to remove it before um any

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of consideration would fall on it. In addition, the

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>UK government is looking to make it easier for consumers

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to cancel subscriptions should they not want a service any longer.

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this in an earlier tech stuff News episode.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure all of you had some sort of experience

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>where you were put through a wild goose chase in

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>an effort to cancel a subscription. Now, personally, I think

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>these are good steps, assuming that the enforcement is reasonable

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and fair, which admittedly is much easier said than done.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>We have a couple more news stories to get through

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>before we get to those, Let's take another quick break.

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Several years ago, I wrote an article for how stuff

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>works dot com about how the large had drawn Collider works,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>And at the time of me writing that article, the

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>LHC had not yet graduated to full power experiments. Didn't

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>stop people from speculating on what the LHC would find

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>or potential calamity it might cause once it goes into power.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I wrote the article on that, and then

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it got up to doing full power experiments. But then

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years, the LHC has been pretty quiet.

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Scientists did initiate some pilot particle beams around the facility

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in October twenty twenty one, but otherwise it's been offline. Now.

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>The purpose for that multi year hiatus was well, there's

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it was manifold. There were quite a few One big

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>one was that there was a massive upgrade to the LHC,

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and there were also repairs and maintenance to the facility.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And now it's back baby. Last week the LHC sent

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>out opposing beams of protons at an injection energy of

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>four fifty billion electron volts. All right, now, let's do

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick rundown in case none of this is making

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>any sense to you. The Large Hadron Collider is a

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>particle accelerator, so it uses extremely powerful electromagnets to both

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>propel and direct opposing beams of particles such as protons,

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>but it could be other stuff too, so that these

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>particles collide at specific points along the pathway. Now located

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at these specific points are a selection of different experiments.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>These experiments focus on different elements of particle science, so

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the collisions create scenarios that are otherwise impossible for us

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to replicate. On Earth, including the formation of teeny tiny

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>black holes that last for a fraction of a fraction

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of a second. That black hole thing is one of

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that trips some people out, But it's really

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>important to note that the energy of these black holes

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is such that they cannot last. It is less than

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a gnat's beating of its wings once like it's it's tiny, tiny,

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>tiny amounts of energy, and they're gone before you can

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>even be aware that they were there without the use

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of incredibly sensitive equipment, so they blip out of existence

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>almost as quickly as they appear. Anyway, the science done

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>at the LHC is expanding our understanding of how the

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>universe works. You know, how energy and how matter work,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's gone a long way to proving or disproving

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>various hypotheses in physics. And just because the facility wasn't

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>actively blasting particles around for three years and some change

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that a lot of important science wasn't going on.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Quite the opposite, in fact, see one of the really

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>big challenges of these experiments is that the collisions generate

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a truly tremendous amount of data, and it's a full

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>time gig just combing through all the information and making

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of it. So, while the facility was effectively offline

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>as far as generating new experiments, there were countless scientists

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>examining the information that we're create was created through the

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>previous years of collisions. Now, in what is being called

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Run three of the LHC, we're gonna see two new experiments,

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>one called S and D at LHC and another called Phaser.

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>These are going to look into everything from physics that

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>go beyond the standard model of physics to the production

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of anti matter. Maybe it will help us understand why

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>our universe had a tiny bit more matter than it

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>had antimatter. That's that's why we've got stuff. If there

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>had been equal amounts, then they would have annihilated each

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>other completely and the universe would be empty. But it's

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not why. Maybe this experiment will help us learn anyway.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I love learning about the LHC, though admittedly the stuff

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>is way over my head. China has announced that it

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to launch a space mission sometime in the

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>next four years in order to send a spacecraft that

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>will collide with an asteroid on purpose to test a

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>potential asteroid deflection system. This is similar to a NASA

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>mission that was launched in November of last year. That

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>mission has sent to spacecraft to collide with Dimorphos, a

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>small asteroid that orbits a larger one called Didimus. Dimorphos

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't on a collision course with Earth, so the NASA

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>mission is really just more of a proof of concept

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to see if we can actually affect an asteroid's flight

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>path by hitting it kind of like a billiard ball,

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>which will happen later this year in September, I believe,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is when it's scheduled to have that collision. Now. NASA's

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>project is called the Double Asteroid Redirection Test or DART,

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and China's test sounds like it's going to be pretty similar,

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>though the country has not yet chosen which asteroid it

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>will target for its own test, and asteroids certainly pose

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a potential threat. The Earth has been hit before and

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>totally transformed by asteroids in the past, so this is

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>another step towards the identification, tracking, and deflection of space

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>objects that could otherwise pose catastrophic danger to life on Earth.

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, it's something we definitely need, and it's it's

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool to think we're getting there. I never

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thought we were gonna, you know, try and deflect asteroids

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>by whacking them, you know, sort of the percussive maintenance

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>approach to asteroid deflection. There were a lot of people

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>discussing things like using a spacecraft to create become kind

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of like a tug boat and using the gravitational attraction

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>between the asteroid and spacecraft itself to deflect the path.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But obviously for that to work, you have to go much, much,

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>much further out in order to affect an asteroid's path

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>before it gets too close to the Earth. Deflection might

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be more effective with the percussive method for asteroids that

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are a little closer in. We'll have to see. And finally,

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who are eagerly anticipating the animated

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Super Mario Brothers movie this holiday season, I have some

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>bad news. The movie has been delayed until April seven

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in North America and April in Japan. This is the

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>film that controversially cast Chris Pratt as the voice of Mario. Anyway,

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo didn't give any details about why there is going

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to be this delay, but there could be a lot

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of different reasons, including production delays due to COVID, but

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we do know we will not be getting the Mario

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>film until next year. But no worries. You can still

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>hunt down and watch the classic nine three live action

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>movie starring Bob Hoskins as Mario, John Legozamo as Luigi,

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and Dennis Hopper as Bowser. I've only ever seen that

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>once and it was like a fever dream. But I've

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>heard more and more folks recently, mostly in the millennial generation,

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about it being entertaining. Not good, mind you, but entertaining.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Dear mileage may vary. And that's it for this episode

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of tech stuff News. If you have suggestions for topics

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I should cover on tech Stuff, feel free to keep

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to me on Twitter with the handled text

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff h SW That Twitter handle is not going anywhere.

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I will continue to maintain it and check it, so

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>reach out there and I'll talk to you again really soon. YEA.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.