WEBVTT - Stocks Near All-Time High on Iran Peace Prospects

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Dan Kurnet where this is now founder's CEO at Macro

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Risk Advisors. He is the surveillance Greek letter authority. Okay,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>so let's have some can we just some math this

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:38.319
<v Speaker 2>early in the.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Morning, Let's give a show.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's go there s equals VOT plus one a f

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>GT squared. Okay, this is the way it is, folks.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>It's physics envy. That's all this finance stuff up is

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>ding kurrent. The rated change is the delta. The rated

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 2>change of the rated change is the gamma. The gamma

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>on the Vicks is off the chart. How do you

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>go from thirty one to eighteen in the vix? What

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>is that signal?

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, you give the President of the United States a

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Twitter account and allow him to escalate and de escalate

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 4>through tweet. Perhaps there's a new Greek called tweet gamma,

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 4>which is you've just got to follow truth. Social you

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 4>have to appreciate the uniqueness of this specific risk event.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Wirsch once told me, if you've seen one financial crisis,

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 4>you've seen one financial crisis. There is commonality, but they're

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 4>all unique. A decade ago was Brexit and we were

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 4>following British poundvall. Right, now it's crude and that's the

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 4>epicenter of every single correlation out there. It drives the VIX,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 4>it drives the move index, the S and P, credit spreads,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 4>and Trump drives crude.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Speak to Global Wall Street right now, listening across the nation,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>around the world, Dean current, We've had a short cover,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>we've had an OMG, you were going up cover. What

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>is the positioning right now that you see?

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's an incredibly important question, and it's very difficult

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 4>to disentangle what's going on oftentimes, because of course there

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>is a ceasefire, there is some kind of green shoots

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 4>of good news. You wouldn't see crude fall by as

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 4>much as it has unless you'd seen that. And yet

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 4>markets have got a lot of mechanical trades that live

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 4>and breathe within them. There's a CTA trading strategy, Commodity

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Trading Advisors, which essentially got very short on the way down,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>and then as the ceasefire prospects emerged, they had to rebuy.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 4>So that was a lot of fuel adding to the market.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 4>If you bought hedges a couple of weeks ago, you

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 4>bought them at a very high VIX. They were expensive hedges,

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 4>and they're going to lose value very fast because as

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 4>you reference Tom, the VIX has fallen fast. It's not

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 4>just fallen, it's fallen fast. So if you've along these hedges, you've.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Got to get out of the way.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 4>If you want to retain any value for that insurance,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>you got to sell it fast, because the market's going

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 4>up and imply volatilities going down to double whammy against

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 4>you if you want to keep some value. That also

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 4>adds fuel to the fire because when you sell a

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 4>put that you own, someone's got to buy stock. That's

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 4>the hedge. And again, all of these things have happened

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 4>all at once, and so what I would just say

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 4>is I kind of caution the interpretation that, Okay, the

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 4>vis is way back down, and that means that there's

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of optimism on the ceasefire. I think there's some,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 4>but we've got to respect the positioning that got kind

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 4>of re orchestrated as a result of the ceasefire as well.

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Dean, when you're talking to your clients right now, do

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 3>you feel like they're looking to buy protection or they

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>looking to maybe buy some risk.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Here, Well, I think it's kind of a both, right.

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 4>You can't get away from the SMP as a benchmark.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 4>We're basically back up. We're really round tripped from seven thousand.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>On the future as well.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're really exactly where we were on the eve

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 4>of the war. And for folks who are managing capital,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 4>the risk of falling behind is a real thing, right,

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 4>So the SMP is this benchmark that you really have

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 4>to be careful not to underperform. So, yes, they are

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 4>rewaiting now if they're listening to us, they're also looking

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 4>at the prospects for owning insurance. That's really what the

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 4>VIC is. It's a proxy for the price. Really have

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 4>a five percent one month put on the S and

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>P five percent out of the money, and that's going

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>to cost just something like fifty five basis points. Right now,

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a really good deal.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, is that is that expensive

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 3>or not? It seem it's.

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Right back to where we were on February twenty six,

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 4>in fact, the day before the war. This put now

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 4>costs twenty five percent less than it did, ok. I

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 4>find that hard to square. I think that the last

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 4>two months have added to the totality of uncertainty that

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 4>investors are up against.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 3>Traders want to go into the weekend with risk because,

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, we're just one social media post away

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 3>from armageddon or just one way or the other, positive

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 3>or negative. I'm not sure. So what a trader do

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 3>kind of towards the end of.

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 4>The week, Yeah, I think, well, so there was a

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 4>little bit of a trend where the Thursdays and Fridays

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 4>were bad returns and then Monday, Tuesday, Wednesdays were good returns.

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 4>I think we're a little bit away from that right now.

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 4>And I think what we have to recognize is that

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 4>there does seem to be a motivation for Trump to

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 4>try to, you know, kind of tie things up into

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Clare victory, and that's the strategy. And I think we

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 4>have to, you know, recognize that a real.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Treat for global Wall Street. Here at the seven o'clock hour,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 2>we start strong Dean at Current with his founder chief

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>executive officer at Macro Risk Advisors. I make jokes about it,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's all Greek to say that, let's do

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 2>a book pause here so that I'm here one day

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in the combine. You know. It's sort of like Game

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>of Thrones. It's like in season three, that big tall tower.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what Bloomberg's like. Somebody comes up a minion. There's

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 2>someone upstairs to meet you, and he's very strange. I

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>go to the escalator and look up, and I'm almost

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 2>in tears. It's Sheldon Leytenberg, who invented the Bible on options.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I kid you not. He's got the short sleeve white

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>astronaut shirt like an Apollo thirteen with the fourteen pencils

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 2>in the plastic container. Explain to the kids right now

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>some of them pass CFA or announced two days ago,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 2>some of them flunked. Explain the value of learning the

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>first seven Greek letters in finance.

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think I'll quote Annie Duke's the famous poker

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 4>player hook book, Thinking in bets. We all think in bets,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 4>we all think in probabilities. And I think that's if

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 4>you're trained in the options market.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 2>There's a couple of things.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 4>One is that there's the physics side, the heat equation

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 4>and all the fancy math and greeks that come out

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 4>of that. That's fun and interesting, and I think it

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 4>provides you with a framework to think about relative prices,

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 4>arbitrage type prices. So that's the first thing. The second

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 4>thing is markets are strange sometimes and they can get

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 4>very far away from the physical sciences. Interpretation of black

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 4>shows you have to be very careful. And you've seen

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of folks, brilliant folks like long term Capital

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 4>blow up with the model being gospel.

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's go to chapter fourteen. Nobody reads it theta.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 2>That's where I live the DX folks in the calculus.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Theta to me is the most understood thing here. Explain

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>if a pro has a bad the vix is moved,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 2>they have to rehedge, explain how they handle the data,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 2>which costs money. That's the biggest problem. Nobody ever says

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>this in the media. It costs money to hedge.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So the first The best feature imbedded in an

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 4>option contract is that it gives you the right to

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 4>change your mind. Wall Street is a you know, it

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 4>doesn't really give out free lunches at all, and so

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 4>it charges you for the right to change your mind.

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>That's important.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>And the charge Tom is theta. Meaning if you own

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 4>an option contract and you're all jazzed up about hedging

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>and you think the market's going to fall fast and

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 4>nothing happens one day that goes by, is the theta.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 4>That's the time decay. So all lseqel that option contract

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 4>is going to be less worth less tomorrow than it

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 4>is today. That's the theta. And what you're balancing that

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>against is the level of churn, the movement in the market,

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 4>because the movement is what allows you to make money

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 4>on theta's inverse, which is the gamma, right, that's the

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 4>rate of change that you can monetize, and that's what

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 4>you're balancing. It's the time decay versus your ability to

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 4>make money trading when you own options.

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Paul, should we move on? Please?

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you?

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>You brought up theta exactly.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Tom asked word see over the last six seven weeks

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 3>with this war here, how would your characterize the trading

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>in the market. It didn't feel panicky to me. Yes,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 3>we had the vics kind of push out that close

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>to thirty, but it didn't feel panick. What did you

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 3>see in the marketplace, Well.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the results from the big banks,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 4>the trading was fast and furious, you know, all things consider,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 4>this is a fascinating event to study.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 2>The vics I.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Think on an intro day basis got as high as

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 4>thirty one tie, but during the tariff tantrum last year

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 4>it got to fifty five, so that was considerably hard

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 4>and the drawdown was considerably greater last year. What you

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 4>do see in these sort of more macro events, where

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 4>again crude is the epicenter and the linkage has become prominent,

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 4>is a move towards index and ETF trading. Right, so

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 4>there was much less discussion around the AI trade over

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of weeks. That's maybe going to come

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 4>back into you know, into view because earnings are coming.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 4>But people were very furiously trading macro instruments and that's

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 4>going to lead to options and ATFS.

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 3>We are now getting you right into the teeth of

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the earning season. When you talk to your clients, are

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 3>they pretty constructive on the earnings out look here and

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 3>the ability for earnings to support this market?

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that's definitely been the playbook. At every turn,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 4>we find a way to for the hyperscalers to increase

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 4>their capex and even at a high bar, to report

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 4>incredible earnings.

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's do that. Let's get away from derivative madness.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I keep mentioning this, folks. There are these two guys,

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Merton and Medigliani. They could execute the double play like nobody.

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>But the answer is bonds is a substitute for capex.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Worry if they just issue the bonds five and seven

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>times over subscribe their profit making companies. Who cares about

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 2>the capex given the marginal thirty to fifty billion dollar

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>bond issuance.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think I think you're correct. What I would

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 4>just say is that the bar gets so high quarter

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 4>after quarter after quarter. Right, there's no doubt that in

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia is going to report that they've made a tremendous

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 4>amount of money, as and Meta and Amazon and Microsoft

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 4>are going to say the same. However, and you know,

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 4>we can use Microsoft as an example. It's an interesting

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 4>one to look at because the way the options market

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 4>prices that particular earnings. And you can see this little

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 4>plug here on the E r N page of Bloomberg.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 4>You could see the one day implied move that the

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 4>market is ascribing to the earning state, and that's about

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 4>six percent. That's really really high for Microsoft, and it

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 4>speaks to the angst around software right the Again, this

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 4>is where the bar gets so high and then you

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 4>start to you know, impose slightly different assumptions, slightly less

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 4>optimistic assumptions, and suddenly you're dealing with a you know,

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 4>a negative results.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a math guy like you have a buy on Microsoft.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 4>I have a hold on Microsoft, as in hold the spy,

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 4>and it's a part of the spy, not really doing

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 4>single stocks as much.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>It's like, you know, it's like he's working for a

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>mutual fund. You what you need is a carefully balanced.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Portfolio exactly, Dean. What are you looking for here for

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the next direction move for this market? Do you think?

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>I think probably more than anything, consolidation with the you know,

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 4>we just have to be incredibly mindful of what we've

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 4>just gone through and that and this is not any

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Trump arrangement syndrome.

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 2>It's just to notice things.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 4>You've got to notice a Twitter account that's moving markets

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 4>in a way that doesn't feel really constructive. I think

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 4>we're supposed to also look at the inflation side of things.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 4>That's a new new sort of thing that's been introduced.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 4>But at the end of the day, the earnings engine

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 4>of the S and P is what empowers everything. If

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 4>that can hold up, then we may just move on

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 4>from geopolitical conflict decurrent.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, really appreciate this morning. Stay with us.

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Boomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us Live

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Murphy is an earned authority. Is far more than

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a former Undersecretary of the Army service to the nation.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>He is geopolitical Advisory Hillcoke Global. Patrick. Did you study

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>blockades when you were in service? Did you study them

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:35.239
<v Speaker 2>in forms of military school? How does Patrick Murphy discuss

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 2>a given blockade?

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Of course, I listen, you had to talk about it,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 5>and you know, you learn about what we did, and

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 5>then during a Cuban missile crisis, you know kind of

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 5>what started that. But as you know, I taught at

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 5>West point for years, and I still lecture at the

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 5>US Army War College. You had to know all the

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 5>demands domains of warfare, you know, land, sea, air space,

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 5>and cyber. So you know, that's what we try and

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 5>do at HOKO Advisory HOCO Global for our advisory group.

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 5>And I tell you the world has never been as

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 5>bald as it is right now, at least it feels

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 5>that way.

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>You know. I look at this and I fall by

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Patrick on my deep military career Russell Kroll and Master

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 2>in Commander, the Patrick O'Brien movie of the Napoleonic Wars.

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>This is a Napoleonic Wars AXIOS has today. That's seventy

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>five percent of casualties Ukraine, Russia are from drones. Patrick

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Murphy on a blockade in an age of drones.

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, listen, I let's hope that there's not swarm

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 5>drones going after you know, our troops that are over there,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 5>because as you know, we've had the largest US military

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 5>build up in that region since before the Iraq War,

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 5>which I served in Darni invasion. And you know, it's

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 5>already cost you know, when you think about Tom Today's

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 5>tax day, it's cost the micro tax payer by the

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 5>end of this month, two months of the war, forty

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 5>two billion dollars.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>And that's from the.

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 5>Pen and Budget Model Office at Penn Wharton where I teach.

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 5>So you know, that's why a lot of Americans are saying, Hey,

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 5>you promised me one thing, no new wars, and you

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 5>gave me this. You promised me less inflation. It's gone up.

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 5>And you know, I tried to be four point two

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 5>percent gas prices over dollar. And that's why, you know,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 5>for US looking and advising industry, they want certainty. And

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 5>that's why not just the American people, but Wall Street

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 5>and business across American this world are pretty frustrated by

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 5>what they're seeing.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Patrick.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, the air offensive against Iran has been extraordinarily

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and extraordinarily effective. But I think what we've all learned

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 3>over you know, the last thirty forty fifty years, there's

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 3>always so much air strikes can do here. What do

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you think the next step should be for the US here?

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's additional talks today of maybe extending the ceasefire.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 3>What do you think is is the best off ramp here?

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, listen, that's those of us who've seen war and

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 5>I've lost nineteen men of my unit, and evasion in

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Iraq do not want war. We'rethy, reluctant warriors. It's always

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 5>the last line of defense. It's also a failure of diplomacy.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 5>So let's hope that we then restart new negotiations. Obviously, Pakistan, Turkey,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 5>i'mon and now China are trying to broker that and

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 5>get that back on the table after the first twenty

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 5>one hours didn't go well last weekend. And by the way,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 5>there's also negotiations as we know in Washington, d C.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 5>Right now, between Levenon and Israel. So it's a fragile ceasefire.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 5>But those of us who understand warfare understand that, you know,

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 5>you cannot have regime change with just airpower. We knew

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 5>that months ago, right and anyone that understands bilt their

0:16:55.640 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 5>history and as commanded that understands it wasn't gonna happen.

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 5>And you know, the Iranian regime is still in place.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Obviously we took out their top leaders, but the toll

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Son is now George. He's even more radical. He lost

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 5>his wife, he lost his son, and that's why a

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 5>lot of folks are clamoring to say, how are we

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 5>going to bring this to as you said, an elegant

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 5>solution at elgon end here where we protect their interest,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 5>have the straight flowing again because of you know, our

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 5>greatest allies get like you look at South Creage, you

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 5>look at Japan.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Seventy percent of the.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 5>Oil comes from the Strait, and so a lot of

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 5>phrasey asking America to figure this out real quick.

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>I got to get this in. I've only got a

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 2>minute and a half. I'm so sorry, sir your comments

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>and the firing of General George General Smith, General C. Q.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Brown Jr. And for that matter, Admiral Franchetti as well.

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>What are we doing with our top brass.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, unfortunately, a lot of great public servants that have

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 5>warn o'clock this country been let go. It reminds me

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 5>of when we fired the Secretary of the Army, Eric

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Schecky before the Iraq work because he spoke truth to

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 5>power and before that war.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>And I will.

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Tell you I am a big believer Tom and suing

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 5>leadership over military should be that way. But at the

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 5>same time, you know, as someone who helped lead the army,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 5>you have to listen to military experts and you have

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 5>to listen, and God gave us all two eyes, two ears,

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 5>and only one mouthful reason. And I feel like they're

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 5>listening only for the They're already listening for what they

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 5>want to hear. And patriots like Randy George Iraq, Afghanistan Vetcher,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 5>West Point graduate, c Q. Brown, the Chairman of the

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Joint Chiefs of Staff, and so many others have been

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 5>let go. And a lot of us who've worn the

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 5>cloth of our country. Are you know, one eyebrow up

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 5>saying what the hell is gone down there?

0:18:58.640 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Washington?

0:18:59.000 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>D C.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Patrick got a run and Paul and I got to run.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>But thank you so much for your time and your

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>public service. It's odd I find Patrick Murphy, that sparta

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 2>who drives the whole ship here. He said the same

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>thing to me the other day. Hey stupid, you got

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 2>two ears in one mouth. Fix it. Mister Murphy is

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 2>with Hillco a Global and of course the former Undersecretary

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Army. We greatly appreciate his support. Stay with us.

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. Eastern Listen on Apple,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 2>She is Wolf Research always a help to us to

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 2>fed asides and lots of other good economic Stephanie roth

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 2>darkins the door today. Can you make a GDP estimate? Now?

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you ken, I mean you have to make some assumptions, right,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 6>So we're assuming that at some point in the next

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 6>couple of weeks that the war ends, and I mean

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 6>both sides seem to want to get to a deal

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 6>despite them being relatively far apart. What you're seeing so

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 6>far is that there's there's no real negative impact on consumption.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 6>You're hearing across the board from companies, the credit card

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 6>data that spending is pretty solid.

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 2>There is cattle a record high that does a dend consumption.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 6>I mean, there are parts of the inflation bucket that

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 6>are elevated, but so far and spending has been solid.

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Returned to surveillance. Steakhouse correspondent Paul Sweeney, where's your tip

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>point on a steak menu item? Is it seventy bucks?

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 2>You go? I'm not paying that.

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 3>I think I represent the market. There isn't one. I

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>don't eat it. That often. But I'm going i will

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 3>find myself in a steakhouse. I'm getting a New York strip.

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not getting you don't have a price resistance point,

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>but I don't know that often. So it's to me

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 3>every time I walk into a steak house, it's a

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>special event.

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 2>So God, Lisa Mateo's not here. He has had steak

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 2>in thirty years. Paul Sweety was Stephanie Row.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>So we're Stephanie. Where do you think we may see

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 3>some of the spillover of now seven weeks of work,

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 3>higher energy costs. Will we see it in inflation? Will

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 3>we see it in slower economic growth? Where do you

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>think we'll see it? If anywhere?

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So far, the March inflation data have been a

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 6>bit lower than expected for a couple of reasons. Airfares

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 6>haven't been quite as high as expected. They were still elevated,

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, call it about two percent month a month.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 7>You've seen there's other some other.

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 6>Things that went the other direction, like legal services, which

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 6>is you know, sort of a one off thing. Generally speaking,

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 6>we do expect to show up in the inflation data

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 6>the next couple months, specifically in airfares, that's the component

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 6>that is most tied to energy prices. That is part

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 6>of core, but outside of that, it might take a

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 6>long time for it to bleed into inflation. And if

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 6>the economy is humming along, if the labor market is

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 6>picking up a bit as we expect, then then the

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 6>economy should be fine.

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 7>We're looking for two point three percent GDP.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Growth and the consumer. Are we in an economy here

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 3>against are the US economies roughly seventy percent? Services? Is

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the case shaped economy such today day that the higher

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 3>part of the K is just driving the bus. It

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 3>almost doesn't matter what's happening out there because we have

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the other part of the k. Those folks are really

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 3>struggling paycheck to paycheck, But we don't see it in

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the ultimate data points, do we?

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 6>No, you have it, and you've seen just the middle

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 6>to upper income people just sort of driving the economy

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 6>and it's you know, it's a problem and a real

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 6>world issue, but from an economic perspective, when you look

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 6>at the macrodata, you don't really see it because everybody

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 6>else has been spending fairly well.

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Sephanie Wroth with us with a terrific synthesis with Wolf

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 2>Research of where we are. So the UNIMF puts out

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the Green Book. I saw it, folks, I relinked in it.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Guess what, I haven't read it yet. It's like four

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 2>hundred pages long. I need a beverage and bill sit

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>next to me. But then the Green Book, they say, OMG,

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the United States their their deficit treasury bill issue wins.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 2>And yet everybody out on Lexington Avenho says, we don't care.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 2>So what is it? It? Does it matter?

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it doesn't matter for now.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 6>At some point there could be an issue where the

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 6>botto market really starts to be upset about it. But

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, we've seen a couple of periods of time

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 6>where the bottom market gets concerned about the deficit and

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 6>then it kind of moves on because over the short term,

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 6>generally speaking, it's economic conditions and FED policy that tend.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 7>To drive where the tenure is.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 6>And by the way, the US is different from the

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 6>rest of the world because the US is a reserve currency,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 6>so it has the ability to take a higher deficit.

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 7>I get it.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 2>But okay, Paul, but I know you want to jump

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>in here. I gotta go to this. I gotta sell Barry.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I can agree my book of the summer, folks, is

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>money and borders. It's very ic a green of Berkeley,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 2>And it's exactly what Ms Roth just said, which is

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>our seniorage, our our having the US dollar is absolutely fundamental.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>The strength of the dollar, the use of the dollar

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>is truly foundational to your work.

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so, I mean what would happen in other countries.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 6>What tends to happen is if investors don't feel comfortable

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 6>with the currency, they're gonna they're gonna pull their money out,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 6>and then you get some big currency moves. But in

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 6>the US it's different because it's the reserve currency. So

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 6>people continue need to need to trade in the dollar,

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 6>and in times where you really get risk off, money

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 6>still comes into the dollar, which then puts downward pressure

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 6>on rates and helps to offset that.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Paul. It's like your rock stars seating at God's country. Sure, Okay,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 2>it's an exorbitant privilege. That's your true that's you start

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to stay. He loved God's Country, Paul.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 3>There we go, So all right, talk to us about

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 3>the labor market. Are we still in a market where

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 3>it's little to no hire, little to no fire, and

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 3>we're just kind of stasis, right, here.

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's been a slow labor market.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 6>This low fire, low higher environment seems to continue to

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 6>be the case.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 7>We might see a bit of a pickup in hiring

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 7>from here.

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 6>We might see call it around seventy thousand, which has

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 6>been the most recent three month run rate. You might

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 6>see a bit of a pickup in cyclical hiring.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 7>There seems to be less of.

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 6>An appreciation for the fact that tariff uncertainty did weigh

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 6>on a labor market last year and that is starting

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 6>to fade. So our expectation is the labor market should

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 6>be hit better this year than it was in twenty

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty five.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>If it's not really growing the labor market, how does

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the economy growth to Did it exist? Workers just get

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 3>more efficient? I guess maybe AI, I don't know.

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's been a productivity cycle that's been a key

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 6>driver of growth and net what problemly continue to be

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 6>and productivity could be really strong in the next couple

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 6>of years, right.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Paul, just ask folks the single smartest question of the quarter,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of the year, of the decade, whatever. I mean, this

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 2>is something on every American's mind. We're sort of leveling

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>out with the immigration changes and all that productivity to

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the rescue. Okay, great, but does productivity help how many Americans?

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 2>What portion of the people benefit from Stephanie Roth productivity?

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not fifty percent, is it.

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, So here's how productivity ends up being a good

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 6>thing for American consumers. It's generally speaking, is initially good

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 6>for companies because it helps the profit margins. They can

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 6>hire less and produce more. But then eventually, at least

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 6>in theory, then you end up having competition amongst companies

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 6>that drives down prices and it allows real to rise

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 6>or wages can rise above inflation, and the people that are,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, having trouble with affordability can kind of grow

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 6>into some of the prices are that exist today.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 3>We are seeing wages growing, are we not.

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing wages growing, but we just are growing faster

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 6>than inflation.

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 7>But we could see that play out even more.

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 6>You tend not to have strong productivity cycles and inflation

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 6>problems at the same time.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>This is brilliant, Paul, your question is beyond trench and

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 2>this is unfair. It's not Cairo, it's kro Illinois. It's

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 2>like this wicked historic Civil War location at the tippy

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>tip bottom of Illinois. The unemployment rate there's fourteen point

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 2>six percent. Now I'm cherry picking one of the worst

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 2>economies in the country to be to be fair, Alexander

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 2>County and Caro, Illinois. But stuff, I got to be

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>quick here. I mean, the dispersion of productivity is more

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 2>narrow maybe than we think.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's possible, and you know, eventually that could that

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 6>could broaden out, and that would be that would be

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 6>a you know, really positive development if.

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 7>It takes time.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 6>If it takes time and which it generally does these

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 6>productivity cycles. And there are pockets of the economy where,

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 6>of course unemployment radar is higher than others. But you know,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, a little about four percent is a fine

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 6>place today.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Brilliant Stephanie Roth, Thank you so much for the little research.

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>David Serby and here I got to get one investment

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Covin in your David Sarby in studio in from Detroit

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 2>with and Cora is, Well, you didn't go to cash,

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 2>did you?

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely not.

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 8>Cash is trash compared to on an inflation adjusted after

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 8>tax basis.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Why so, do you fly new cash now?

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Or do you go I made the right decision? You do?

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 8>You put cash to work prudently. Okay, But if you

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 8>look at when sentiment gets unusually bearish, as it did

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 8>in mid March. Twelve months later, the S and p

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 8>on averages up twenty percent, the Russell two thousand small

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 8>caps up twenty five percent, why go to cash?

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay? So, folks, we've got a really special treat for

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>you right now. We get Sobery out of the way

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>with the investment thing. Nobody cares and we're thrilled he

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 2>is here today, Paul Sweeney. He's like, yeah, I do

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 2>finance and bonds and banking, and yeah I can do radio.

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Tom Keene amateur, Mark Crumpton and Katie Ka Pittsburgh yep

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 2>km OX and say you know these names, Walter Crost

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>before CBS out in the midwe What people don't know

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 2>here is we get to work every day with a

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 2>rock star w JR. All you need to know is

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 2>there was a point where they said to Ernie Harwell,

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 2>where we structuring Michael Barr with us from w j R,

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 2>which David Sawerby is a foundation part of Detroit. What

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>was it like the day they said goodbye to Ernie

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Harwell of the Detroit Tigers.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 9>I'll never forget this. I was driving down dis Road

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 9>and I'm listening and at first I hear that, okay, well,

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 9>there you know, Ernie Harwell is going to move on.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 9>And it's like, oh, that's too bad. And as I'm driving,

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 9>all of a sudden, Ernie says, no, I didn't want

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 9>to go. They told me to leave, and I almost

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 9>wrecked the car and I'm like, oh, no, this is

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 9>And sure enough the moment I got into work, it

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 9>was David Sawerby.

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you live this as well. Michael Barr is

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 2>iconic within Detroit. We treasure having him every single explain

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>like KMOX and Saint Louis or Katie Knaw. There's WTP,

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Washington and all that explain Michael Barr and w JR.

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>To people who were bored out of his financial news

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 2>every day.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 8>Ernie Harwell was the voice of the Tigers. They brought

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 8>him back. Remember that and an icon in Detroit. And

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 8>I'm here to speak for Detroit. When I was walking

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 8>through the airport to board, there's a store. It's called

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 8>Detroit Versus Everybody, and I can tell you with great enthusiasm.

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 8>And Detroit debt has been upgraded eleven times in the

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 8>last ten years, from Triple C to BUBA one. It

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 8>has been It had been a long time since Detroit

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 8>was investment grade, but it's a value stock that got

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 8>much better.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we got to get back to investors of Michael

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Barr quickly. Here where do you go for the best steak, sandwich,

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of meat thing in Detroit? Where is the restaurant?

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, you know where I love going, and

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 9>that's the Detroit to Coney Island.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 8>David American or Lafayette, Lafayette, Lafiete.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we got Michael Bart. Thank you so much for

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 2>joining us definitive at WJR. Our privileged to be with

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 2>them every day. Paul Javier Blass. The price of beef

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 2>just hit a record high, David sawbrig at Coney Island,

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 2>La Fiette or anyplace else. How do we deal with

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 2>record cattle prices?

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 8>Inflation will still be a temporary event, I believe, because

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 8>the FED is still only growing M two at five

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 8>to six percent. That's not like the twenty percent growth

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 8>rates that gave us the eight percent inflation. So the

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 8>concern about energy, and it's rightly so four dollars for

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 8>a gallon of gas, it will be temporary because the

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 8>FED is not ratifying it by printing more money. They're

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 8>much more sensible than they were in twenty twenty one.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 2>So David's what's.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Kind of your allocation these days? Stocks, bonds, alternatives? Has

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 3>it changed it all over the last couple of months.

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 8>Generally, no, Public equity is still the best place to

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 8>make money. Private equity is getting exposed for not having

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 8>the illiquidity premium people often thought. Private credit is certainly

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 8>under duress. So it leaves you back to public equity,

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 8>and with the S and P generating eleven percent free

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 8>cash flow margins and double digit earnings growth, it's still

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 8>the place to be to grow your wealth.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Economic data out to get a lift, I got a

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 2>little bit higher yield, a little bit of the disinflationary

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>since plus empire manufacturing, the buffalo statistic that comes in

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>more optimistic with an eleven versus zero. These are more

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 2>constructive numbers, Paul, as we've heard from others, including mister Sowerby.

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Exactly right. How about equities here at David US versus

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 3>non US, because we did have a little bit, you know,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty five, US equity markets did very well,

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of the markets outside the US did

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 3>even better. How do you think about that?

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 8>I still think it's a US biased allocation in portfolios.

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 8>It's been that way since nineteen eighty seven. SMP has

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 8>compounded five percentage points annualized over the MSCIEFA. As I said,

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 8>our free cash flow margins are still well above we're

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 8>seeing in non US. And a quick shout out to

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 8>small caps as we like to talk about that. Since

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 8>Thanksgiving of last year when we all asked for good things,

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 8>small caps are up fifteen percent. The SMP is up

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 8>four percent, so they're certainly robust opportunities in small caps.

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 2>As Detroit Lions faded. David Serby AI, is there a

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 2>mid cap play in AI? Or does David Sawerbery gotta

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 2>buy Microsoft I?

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 8>For the record, in my large cap portfolio, the largest

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 8>position is Broadcom, which is AI spending beneficiary, but indirectly,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 8>I'll give you Stefol mid cap only six analysts following.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Still the financial, Yes, the financial. They're on the shoulder

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Saint Louis Cardinals.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 8>And they're growing revenue at ten percent. The valuation is attractive.

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 8>They're acquiring advisors who are leaving the big shops to

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 8>go to somebody who's more entrepreneurial and a very good opportunity.

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 8>And they're a beneficiary of AI. It's helping them with

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 8>productivity and compliance administrative duties. Young advisors are learning as

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 8>fast as to become smart like older advisors because AI

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 8>is helping UH and a company like.

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Steve they have lind Yes, I mean that's another reason.

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm still looking at the Lafay at Coney and menu

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 3>here what I do? That's my next ship. That did Detroit,

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 3>That's where I'm going. We had rotation kind of late

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 3>last year out of some of the high growth or

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 3>high multiple stocks into smaller value. Was that a short

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 3>term trade? Is that something you're playing? How do you

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 3>think about that?

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 8>I think it's got more duration because now it's six

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 8>months into this small cap rotation and I can buy

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 8>valuations in small cap on a technical free cash flow

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 8>yield basis of six and a half to seven percent

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 8>compared to a treasury that looks very attractive. Amentum is

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 8>another idea. It's a global engineering technology play. They made

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 8>equipment for the Artemis Orion rocket. They make equipment for

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 8>a golden dome for missile defense. There's only six animals

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 8>who follow Amentum. It's a small cap MidCap stock.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Twenty seconds. Is it so cool to see Mary Barr

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 2>and Cadillac at F one? It's just got It's just

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 2>in Detroit. It's just got to be great.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 8>GM has made a great transformation, better better capital allocation

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 8>of their cash flow generation. They're growing the dividend once again.

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 8>You can own the auto stocks more permanently than simply

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 8>dating them, and that speaks to general motors.

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 2>David Sarvey think as much treasure the comments on Michael

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Barr and w JR.

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>can also watch US live every weekday on YouTube and

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal