WEBVTT - Man Group's CEO Says Stop Asking People Where They Went to School

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Merritt and I'm Francin Laqua and this is

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in the City, Bloomberg's podcast, connecting you to the stories

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and the voices at the heart of the City of London.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>This week a conversation with Luke Ellis, chief executive offer

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of Man Group, the world's largest publicly listed hedge fund firm. Luke,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming in. It's great to

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>be here. So you're one of the most famous hedge

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>fund chief executive not the hedge fundie, but actually you

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have quite an interesting career path. I'm not sure whether

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>famous is a never been a goal and I guess,

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>but look at it, given the public profile of Man,

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes with the job. And you know, I think

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we should as a firm take a leadership position on

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff because that's the position we have as an ability

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to do that type of thing. My career, well, I

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was one of those people who from a very very

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>early age sort of love numbers and love patterns. And

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I was having a conversation with my grandfather about horse

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>race betting when I might have been five or six

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and sort of worked out that the bookies were making

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>money all the time and said I'd like to do that,

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and he said, well, we'd like to say, go and

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>work in the city. So I just that was the point.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I knew I wanted to work in the city, but

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really know what the different jobs were. And

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm old enough that this is pre internet,

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I took the first job I could

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>find working in the city, and things went from which

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>it was within the mirror. It was as a graduate trainee.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You know. Our introductory speech was from the Japanese head

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the office who said, the Bank of England tells

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>me we need more white faces in the office. You're

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>my white faces. And then he walked out, you were

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a diverse higher. So we were a diverse high. Now

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to claim that I have suffered in

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>diversey at all, but but it's just an interesting perspective

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of the journey we've all come on, and that's fascinating.

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And of course, back in that moment, Nomura in Japan

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.839
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a very dominant force in world finance.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>It sounds amazing when you look back and think so

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time, with one quarters profit, Namura could have

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>bought Merrill, Lynch or Goldmen sex cash and when there

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>there used to be an amazingly profitable business. Now I

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>will admit I took the job without knowing it was

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese firm. Was there were three jobs that you

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't know it was a japan didn't know there were Again,

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like amazing this you couldn't look it up on

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Suppose no, you couldn't. So so I went

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>into the careers office, which was a room full of books,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and said I wanted to work in the city. And

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they said, there are the accounting jobs, and I'm like, no, no,

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do accountants. And there were three

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>books by three pamphlets about three jobs. I applied for

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the three jobs. The first one that offered me a job,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, thank you very much. As I was sitting outside,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>having sort of signing the documents, having said yes please that,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody said are you looking forward to the three months

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in Tokyo? And I slightly nonplus looked around, realized the

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>decoration was a bit weird now you mentioned it. And anyway,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I signed up to three months in Tokyo, which was

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant time. So Tokyo, then, you know, one of

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the big financial capit as well. It's still an important place,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but very different. Then. Tell us about arriving as a

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of trainee in Tokyo and what that felt like.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>That really was being othered. Japan still doesn't like immigration.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Back then, they had absolutely none. Back then they were

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>masters of the world. And you know, the Japanese equality

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>market was worth Remember we got to twenty seven percent

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or something amazing of the global index. And it was

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of in them build up to the bit where

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Imperial Palace was worth more than California and real

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>estate value. It was that sort of amazing time. I'm

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in the mid eighties and yeah, we were tolerated rather

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. But it was a really interesting experience

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>learned some Japanese, learned to understand the Japanese, which has

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>been something that I've sort of leveraged off throughout my career,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So, look, when you look back at that time,

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is it more surprising the change I guess in Japanese

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>finance that we've experienced I've lost thirty years, thirty five years,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or the change in the city of London. So the second,

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was a classic bubble, and did I

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>know when it was going to pop. No, But it

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't take very long to work out this didn't make sense, right,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, there were all sorts of sort

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>of things about you know, but a pineapple cost more

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>than whatever, not quite a car, but that sort of

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thing in the west. You know, it was all sort

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of like, Okay, this doesn't make any sense. And the

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that that burst is not that so much of

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a surprise. And many of the things that amazing about

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Japanese society is how little it's changed. Yeah, the city

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>here was so radically different back then to now and

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of obviously lots has changed in the UK, lots

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>has changed in Europe, but that there's sort of I

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>think the city back then had many of the worst

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the UK. And somebody was talking to me

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the other day about, you know, do you think there's

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>no racism in the city or no misogyny, and it's like, well,

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of course there is. But compared to a period where

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it was materially worse than the national average, I would

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>say the city is now at least as good as

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the natural average and probably better. What happened back then, again,

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is it tied to banking culture more than the city

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of London. It's very hard to get one's head around

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>how unglobal finance was back then. And while I did

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a job going and working in Tokyo, that was so

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>weird and unusual. And you know, most people working in

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the city of London would never have been outside Europe

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for work and not really been outside the City of

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>London for work in most cases, you know, and what

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>was going on in New York was very, very separate

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to what was going on in London. Yeah, because this

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is obviously before any of the big banks. As it

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>goes in the next couple of weeks, I'm about to

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be sixty, so I'm you know, this was a long

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>time ago, but it was pretty big bang just before that,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it was it was a different thing,

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>but it was a very insular, insular environment which had

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a mixture of a sort of, if you like, a

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>posh part of UK society that that looked down on

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>anything other than posh white men. And we used to

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>have that thing about barrow boys, which somehows. I mean,

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>actually that got that's one area which hasn't really got better.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, back then, well there was an

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of drinking. That was a very different thing

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in the culture. Going for lunch time, right, yeah, I

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>mean going going for four or five points at lunch

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was normal, not unusual, and still going back to your

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>desk and working it was. I mean, it's amazing when

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you look back at those things. It's a bit like

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of obviously everybody smoked in the I mean not

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>every but all offices had people smoking everywhere and so on.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But but it was really just the attitude about being

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>unpleasant to you know, pick whatever, you know, if you

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't a posh white male, the world was unpleasant to you.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And and Britain as a whole has changed obviously normously

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in those times. And do you think the city has

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>moved along with British society or is still lagging behind?

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You said there are still some issues here. How do

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you see the landscape today in terms of how people

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with these very British problems about class and looking

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>down notes on people with less money. I mean, it

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is how are we doing now here in the city.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's gone from being materially worse than

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the UK to being at least as good, and I

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>would say probably better. In a number of aspects. So

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>there is one thing in the city which you know,

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>by the nature of dealing with money all day, every day,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it is pretty impossible to have a totally balanced attitude

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to money, right, And it's not normal, right, it's not

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>an average Yeah, you know, you move billions and trillions

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, pounds, yeend whatever, every day, every whatever. It's

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's quite hard to to not say some things to

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>do with money which sound weird in any other context.

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think the general thing of the culture has

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>really come a huge long way, and there's lots more

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we can do, absolutely, but you know, and but there's

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lots more we can do in society if you sort

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of mean, but I think we're you know it is

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a healthy place to day and you know,

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of yes, but we should all keep working on

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it an even better place if we

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>can open to as many people as possible, because that

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole point about the city is it is an

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>intellectual boiling pot, right. I mean, it's about getting as

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>much IQ together into yes, an individual, but then into

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a room and then into a building and then into

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole city. And you know, it's it is the

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of having all of this IQ bumping into each other.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But you need diverse thinking in order to make that,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a benefit. It's it's that you know. It's

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>like one of the favorite expressions in the city is

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>where there's no the only thing that's a free like

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a free lunch is diversity is diversification. Right in a portfolio,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you diversify and that gets you improve returns,

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>less risk. Every type of thing in finances about diversification,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and it applies just as much in people. If you

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have ten people who are incredibly smart, but all have

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same background in different forms, they're not going

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to be much cleverer than one person. Maybe they'll be

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>better than one, but they're not going to be better

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>than five people, or probably not better than two. You

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>get people who've got a different perspective. The collective is

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>much smarter because that's how you get away from group think.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But how do you and you've really championed right diversity

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in the workforce through indicease and initiatives at Man, how

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>difficult is it to recruit diversly? Recruiting diversely for people

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>coming in at the graduate at master's level, it's not

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that hard, right you have to you have to have

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>an attitude shift, and once you have an attitude shift,

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really not that hard. At that level, there is

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. And if you start by not

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>saying what school did you go to and what college

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at Oxford are you at, but try and actually look

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>at the individual persons capabilities and achievements and so on.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, I think it's easy to hire in

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at the graduate level in a truly diverse way. That

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the challenges as you move up through the organization that

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, so our senior leadership, so that's sort of

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>one level down from me and one level below that.

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a big cohorted sort of a

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of hundred people. And we are in the current

0:11:54.559 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of high twenty percent for gender diversity there and

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as I say, compared to where the city would have

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>been once upon a time, you know, that's amazing, but

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in reality it's still high twenties. It's not forties. It's

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>not even as high as where we are at the

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>overall firm, and it's hard moving the dial and sort

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of even as you dig into that, you know, funny enough,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the people talent side of our business. We have

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>more senior female leaders than we do in the investment

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>side of the business, and you sort of think, ah,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but of course the average person leading one of our

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>investment teams has been doing it for thirty years, you know,

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And so that that that bit of the funnel that

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>came in means it's easy to do the right things

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about sort of senior positions, but it's hard to move

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the dial a long way? Is that the only reason? Though? Time?

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Or are that other barriers still meaning women aren't progressing

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>up to the top ranks of big city firms. Still

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>some cultural hurdles that we need to unpack. So I mean,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like I'm I'm definitely sure that the dominant thing is

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline problem. But you know, it's not just how

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it was thirty years you know, fifteen years ago, people

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>still used to celebrate the shouty, aggressive trading floor idea,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 1>right that was that, you know, and still frankly, you see,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what, the BBC did a program about the

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>city and it's you know, still got shouting dealing floors

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, a sort of machismo and you know

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>it sort of heroes women who are more machismo than

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that puts lots of people off, put

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of people off in the past. I mean, if

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you come on our dealing floor, you know, we trade

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot and sting none but I mean

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like none that the people complain it's too loud. But

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's just people talking well part from me. We have

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the same in the newsroom. Yeah, it's not a prerequisite

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>for success having that kind of you know, not at all.

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>And the and yeah, but but the the first is

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>broadening the pipeline of people coming in. The second is

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>then making sure that you don't sort of celebrate the

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong type of culture. And that's where management comes in.

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that is where the good leaders are

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>making a real difference and someplaces not so much. And

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could think of the coming back from COVID,

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and some firms tried to make us sort of look

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at us. You know, we're the first ones back in

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the office. We've told everybody they have to be at

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>their desk every day and you're like, okay, but I

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that because it's a dumb way to manage people.

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you want to get the best

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>out of people telling them they all have to conform

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to some rule you learn forty years ago. It's pretty dumb, honestly.

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, what we try to do is

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to find the working process that gets the best out

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of each person. And so we've got people who are

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in the office five days a week from early to late,

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and we've got people who are you know, dotted all

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>over the country and frankly the continent, don't come to

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the office very much. But that's how we get the

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>best out of those people. Look, is that out of

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. So you left the city right at some point?

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Why why did you leave? And why did you come back?

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>First point of earning money is so you can afford

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to live, and that is incredibly important, and we know

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there's an enormous number of people in this country and

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>beyond who are struggling with just that every day, and

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>especially now at the moment you get get there. The

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>second stage is in order to have enough that you

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>can look after your family and savings. And then at

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>some point you have enough money that the money is

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to create choices. And it's amazing how many people

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>get caught up in well, I just want more money,

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>which is a choice, doesn't seem a terribly brilliant choice,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's a choice. And there are some people where

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you have done amazing things because they're driven purely by

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>finance as a motive. Again, one of the reputations of

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the city is people only come into the city to

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>make money, you know, But that's the thing of the eighties, right,

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not the world today. People come to work in

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the city. People succeed in the city because they love

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the intellectual challenge of what is like a brilliant if

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got a brain that likes complicated puzzles. Finances amazing, right,

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's always changing. And that's I mean, that's what

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>got me excited. I was in a lucky enough position

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to have made enough money that I had choices, and

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I reached a point where I wasn't enjoying what I

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>was doing, and so I stopped to do And I

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't know. I mean, I stopped, and honestly I did

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>if you'd asked me to guess. I didn't think I

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>would ever come back to the city. I didn't think

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I come back to a full time work. But I

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I just I stopped because I had a choice.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I had an option. You know, essentially my kid's life

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>for my life was funded. And so was that hard decision?

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you agonize every about it or was it just

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>not really? Because you know, it's one of the conversations

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I've had regularly over the last thirty or forty years

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>with my wife of I worked really hard because I

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy it. But at the point, it's not good

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to go home and moan about I'm not to enjoy

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>my work when like, you don't have to do it now.

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, it's entirely different if you've got to

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>turn up at you know whatever, drive your truck every

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>day in order to pay for guests and food. But

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I you know, once you're in a position where you

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's you don't need the money in order to live

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a nice life. You know, of moaning about your work

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>seems really dumb. So what load you back? So I

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>came back for what was a new for me and

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>look really interesting intellectual problem. So I got a built

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a business for JP Morgan. So I'd built a business

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>for somebody else, I'd built a business. That was my

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>first go around, if you like, first career, second career

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was to build a business with a partner, so for ourselves,

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't have an urge to do either of

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>those things again. And what drew me back was so

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it was the time where man merged with GLG, brought

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>GLG hover one wants to describe it. And I could

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>see that this was a very complicated mess that they

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>were creating, and the thought of how do you turn

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>around a mess somebody else has created. I'd never done that,

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and it looked like a really interesting intellectual problem. And

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been a really interesting intellectual problem. And touchwood that's

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily you know, draws most people to cleaning up

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>other people's mess. I mean, I'm fascinated by that, you

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>know what, and you just because you you could you

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>see the opportunity through the mess of what you might

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to build at the end of it. No, honestly,

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that part of what made it really interesting

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>was I could see the problems and at the time

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't at all clear whether there was a path

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>through the mess. But but that's a like complicated puzzles,

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you like, And this was a people and you know,

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>finance and whatever puzzle, and that that was that was

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>like a really I mean to me that that was

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>like an irresistible but that's what brought me back. It

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was just an irresistible puzzle and fascinated by that. And

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>we often in the newsroom talk about you know, deutter

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Bang went through four chief executive critic sweet is the same?

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Like what draws people to difficult jobs? Can you point to,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess, characteristics in people that you want to hire

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that make them succeed? It? Is it the intellect? Is

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the drive? Is it that fire in the belly? Like

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>what makes a good employee? The definition of believing indiversity

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is that there isn't a thing that makes a good

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>employee right that? That is exactly part of the bit

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is you can't look at everybody on the basis of

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are they the best person for this thing right now?

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The big leap in mindset is three years forward. You

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>could pick a longer die, but three years is sort

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at my attention span. So three years forward is this

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>team going to be better for that person being part

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of it? And because if you start, you know, okay,

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Fred's left, I need to replace Fred. Who are the

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>candidates that I can hire today, who are the most

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>suited for Fred's job today, and I say Fred on purpose,

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>The answer is, you're going to hire somebody who looks

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and sounds like Fred. You're going to hire exactly in

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the image of the person who left. You do that,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you're never going to improve the diversity of thinking in

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the firm. If, on the other hand, you go, Okay,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Fred's left, that's life. But we now have a chance

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to bring other skills into this team. You know, will

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>accept a sort of some Jacob effect where we may

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>not get the perfect fit for the immediate problem exactly today.

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>But if three years from now we can bring somebody

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in that makes the team better, that, you know, you

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can get much more out of that than And so

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>then you get to thinking about, Okay, I want somebody

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>who thinks differently, who's got a different because they actually

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>help the thought process. So you can pivot, in fact,

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole business or a whole team's work around that person.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You've mentioned puzzles a few times, sort of fitting pieces together.

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But this kind of question of diversity in who you

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>bring in and the skills, it's about reconfiguring the pieces,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't it all around them, not necessarily fitting someone in? Yes,

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, that's that's a very good way of

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>saying it. And look at the sort of if you

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>like the bit everybody sees the rumberg celebrates of our

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>job is the financial puzzles. But as you get into

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a management and then a leadership position, really what you're

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>dealing with is people puzzles, and it's you know, people

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are really interesting and complicated and so on and so yeah,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it's about trying to fit those puzzles. So how do

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>you get the best out of the team, How do

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you get the most going forward? And that sort of

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>comes back to that. I definitely went off from one

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of your earlier questions. Why do we think it's important

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to embrace different working practices for different people in different ways,

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>is because that's how you get that puzzle to be

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the best. People who feel good about what they're doing,

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>People with a smile do better work. We've all had

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to do some report, something that you know you don't

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>really want to do. It's amazing how long it can take,

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you're enjoying it, it's amazing how quickly this

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast is flying by. Right. I don't know what you mean.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I love waking up at four am for some time

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>London was the world capital of hedge funds, and whole

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>areas of the city were given over to the funds

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in Mayfair Ands and James is. We've written a lot

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of funds moving or shifting people places

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like to buy post Brexit around Europe. Is London still

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the center of the world for this, You're effectively one

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>should think of New York, except it's not really New

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>York the center, right, And so one can claim some

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers for London relative to New York because of where

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>people actually are in the States. Now, London has a

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>massively dominant proportion of the non US based hedge fund people. Now,

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>whether the business is somewhere X or Y, whether it's

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.479
<v Speaker 1>people working for a US firm but based in London,

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the sort of we all like the

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>stories about somebody's moving to you know, first of all,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>it was Geneva, and then they all came back, and

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>now maybe it's Dubai. But never Frankfurt, no phrase, not

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>really Frankfurt, you know. And Brexit was going to spread

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>everybody all over Europe, but it really didn't do that

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to the hedge fund business. It had a much bigger

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>effect on private equity, right, But in actual hedge funds,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>London is I mean so dominant in non US center

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of gravity and the US. You know, it used to

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>be all New York and then it was Inch and

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut and well maybe it's all becoming Florida or wherever

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, you know there there are people will

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>do a trade for tax. That is human nature. I

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would say that the trade off between there's a different

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>trade off between New York and Florida than it is

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>between London and Dubai. And even if the tax pickup

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is really a lot, it's not very It's an expensive trade.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>If you still think that London's a good home for

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, are you finding the right talent? Like what's

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>your biggest concern actually on diversity employees and actually keeping

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>them here unhappy? Yes, we're finding lots of really good talent.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the trying to get the right phraseology so

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that there was a period let's call it eighteen months

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>ago where but I've the dates wrong where everybody wanted

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to either go and work for a tech firm preference

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a startup, or they wanted to go and work for

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a crypto firm, and there was a period where it

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was hard to get you raw talent um. You know,

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>it was a fascinating thing that somewhere in the second

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>quarter of last year the both of those light bulbs

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>went off and it's back to be you know, but

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of they you know, crypto blew up and

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>then take people stopped hiring, and that means that there's

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>an enormous amount of raw talent available. You know. Would

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I like it that it was easier to get visas

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>into the UK than it is? Yes, but you know

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a political comment and there's nowhere in the world

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that isn't currently more difficult on immigration than it should be.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't it doesn't get in the way of

0:26:54.560 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>hiring great talent and still very very diverse talent. You know,

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of nationalities we have continues to go up. Look,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>when you look at all the incentives, I guess you

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have a man group to keep that level of seniority

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>with diversity right within your employees. Is there something that

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>works better than others in terms of getting and building

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the broadest team we can get? My conclusion is there

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>is no silver bullet to this. What you have to

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do is lots of things which move it a little bit.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, whether that's having supporting outside organizations, having

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>lots of internal networks, so people, you know, you want

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>people to feel like they belong right, and that's a

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>very important part of it. And that's how you get

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>people to stay. It's a good word, belong right. It

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>does not just mean they fit in. It's like they

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>actually belong. And so one of the ways of that

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>internally is networks. And you know, that's people who have

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>similar attributes whatever you want to say. And while we

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>always make sure that they know they've got senior sponsorship,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they're always organically done up from the bottom. Yeah, we've

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>had big success with a return of program. This is

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>getting people who've had a ten year career break, and

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>they could have had the career break for all sorts

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. But I think practically all of them have

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>been women coming back from parenting. We've had fantastic people

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>out of that program that they've both added greatly to

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the firm and been you know, I mean to do

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a great, great full that's a bad word, but whatever

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to have had you have people have faith in them.

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But you can't have fifty of those people every year

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>because they just aren't that many people at that decision

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>point in life, you know, the thing that we've always avoided.

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And I you know, I've watched a couple of firms

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>who try to use their checkbook to go and run

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>around and hire all the senior women they could find

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in the city so they could say, look at us,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>our stats have gone up, and you know, well that

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>might let them stand up and say, look, my stat's

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>gone up. It hasn't improved anything in the puzzles. So

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just throwing money at this doesn't fix the problem. Well,

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's look that money can help in different ways, right,

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's not a bad thing. But I mean the

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of if all you do is rob Peter to

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>pay Paul or maybe rob Jane to pay Sharon, you

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing anything very useful, right, And so I think

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's important that you know, what we're all trying to

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>do is to bring people into the city and enable

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>them to thrive and succeed. And you know, so we

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>organize a lot of mentoring for sort of anybody who

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>needs it and wants it, but you know, we make

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sure or there's a lot more encouragement to um sort

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of mid level women to take mentorship because you know,

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a thing about willingness to be pushy for themselves,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not really about being pushy, right, but you know,

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and we try to always adjust for the you know,

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>just for the thing where a man shouts that they

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>want the job and a woman says, I'm not sure

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>if I'm ready. But one of the ways you're trying

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to adjust in all the talent planning, but also one

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the ways is in mentoring, helping people understand both

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as a man that's not necessarily helpful, but particularly as

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a woman. Yeah, it's okay to say I'd like to

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>give it a go. We know that pay has not

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>been equal, right, I mean, we've talked about it on

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, and one of the reasons that there's still

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some cultural and across gender problems in the city is

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because people aren't getting paid the same to do the

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>same job. How much of a problem is that. Do

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you think there'll be places where it's a big problem

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and places where it's not much of a problem. In

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the effort of coming up with a simple stat that

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>applies to every business in the country, the government stats

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on gender pay gap are not really very informative, so

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't compare like would like to do. They actually yeah,

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's just yeah, exactly, It's just that the actually,

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the population differences drive everything with data, notts, right. So

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of data about the people internally,

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and we work to come up with what we think

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is a true number. And the true number for us

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is a very low single digit number, which you could

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>say doesn't really matter apart from it annoys the hell

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>out of us because it's not a random number. It's

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a few percent one way each year.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And we've keep doing things to try to get rid

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of it entirely, and you know, and it shows somewhere.

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of the residual bits are really difficult. You know.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the good things that's happening is, you know,

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there are definitely you know, today a female sort of

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>successful portfolio manager has a higher market worth than a

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>male successful portfolio manager or of equal thing. Now you

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>know that's not true in every job in every way.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, Similarly, in the US, a successful you know,

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a performing successful black person has a higher market value.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know there's a sort of twenty five to

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent premium in in comp today that way around,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and like that's a good thing because you know, somewhere

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you start to move the overall averages in the right way.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>What happens to the Barrow boys that you were talking

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about from the eighties. So that's been a that's been

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the sad bits of you know that I think,

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, social mobility in the UK is a big problem.

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It's easy sitting in London to focus on the sort

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of some of the obvious diversity issues within London, but

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>when you get to the UK, you know, white working

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>class boys are the underperforming group out there, and it's

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a big group, right, it's not home, you know, it's

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever thirty percent type of thing. It's um and so

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of something I believe in, we believe in,

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and so we've tried to find things and then we've

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>been one of the sort of founder sponsors of an

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>initiative for the City of London which is trying exactly

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to work on social mobility. And I would say that's

0:33:53.960 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the last bastion of open prejudice, that is, you know,

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of people need to break down right that that

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>asking somebody what school they went to is not an

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting question, and yet it is still far too often

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a question people have, and people, yeah, I went to

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a comprehensive school. Do you want to know? The name?

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably not right and you know, so, you know, I

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>think there is definitely more we could do. And you know,

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>it's again the sort of the barrow Boys used to

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be a joke that was about separating two classes within

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the city. The joke may have gone, but you know

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that this further we can go on that look. Thank

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you so much, it's been a real pleasure. Thanks for

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>listening to this week's in the City. We'll be back

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>next week, but in the meantime, if you like our show,

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>please head on over to Apple Podcasts or wherever you

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts. Great review and subscribe. This episode was

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>hosted by Me David Merritt and me Francie Laqua. It

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Sammersadi, additional editing by Blake Naples and

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>special thanks to Luke Ellis.