WEBVTT - At the Money: Behavior Beats Intelligence (Podcast)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>The finance types tend to focus on attributes like intelligence,

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>math skills, and computer programming. But it turns out financial

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>success is less about knowledge and more dependent on how

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you behave and make decisions than raw intelligence. How you

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>behave with money matters more than what you know about money.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Redults and on today's edition of At the Money,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss how to make sure your behavior

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is not getting in the way of your portfolio. To

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>help us unpack all of this and what it means

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for your investments, let's bring in Morgan Housel. He is

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the author of The Psychology of Money. The book has

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>received widespread acclaim for its insightful approach to personal finance

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and has sold six million copies worldwide. So Morgan, let's

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>start with your main thesis. Financial decisions in the real

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>world are influenced by our personal history, worldviews, ego, pride,

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>too many other factors to list. It's not just mathematical calculations,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Barry.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I think one analogy here would be think about health

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and medicine. You can have a medical degree from Harvard

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and know everything about biology and have all that insight

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 2>in that intelligence, but If you smoke and you don't

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>need a good diet and you're not getting enough sleep,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>none of it matters. None of the intelligence matters unless

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 2>the behavior actually clicks and is working. And finance is

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the exact same. You can know everything about math and

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>data and markets, but if you don't control your sense

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>of greed and fear and you're managing uncertainty and your

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>own behavior, none of it matters. So this is why

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>finance is one of the few fields where people who

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 2>do not have a lot of education and financial sophistication,

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>but if they have the right behaviors can do very

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>well over time.

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like behavior over knowledge is the key. Why is

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it that how we behave matters so much more than

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>what we know? Does financial knowledge? It all insulate us

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>from poor decision making?

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it can. Of course, there are lots of

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>professional investors who are extremely good at what they do.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>But what is important is that behavior is the base

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>of the pyramid. What I mean by that is, if

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 2>you have not mastered behavior, none of the financial intelligence

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 2>that lies on top of that matters. And this is

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 2>why you have professionals who have all the great background

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 2>and all the data, all the connections that the amateurs don't,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 2>who still do very poorly. And it's so counterintuitive in

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>investing that the harder you try, it's very often that

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 2>the worse you do. And it's counterintuitive because there aren't

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 2>many other areas in life that are like that. If

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>you want to get better at sports, if you want

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>to get better at a lot of different professions, you

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 2>need to try harder. You need to work harder, you

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>need more information, you need more into and investing it's

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 2>usually the opposite. It's the people who just leave it

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>alone and go enjoy the rest of their lives and

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 2>leave their portfolio alone to compound uninterrupted for years or

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 2>decades tend to be the ones looking back who have

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>done the best.

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Don't just do something. Sit there, that's right. It seems

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>obvious we should have a long term perspective in financial

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>planning and investing, and yet we tend to get pulled

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>into impulsive short term thinking. Why is this?

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's largely because there is so much information

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to do. So if the stock market were opened once

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>a year, that would actually be fine. And you know,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 2>once a year that it was open, it would go

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>up ten percent or down twenty percent whatever you would do,

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>but it would just be once a year, whereas in

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>investing we have literally all day, all day of information,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 2>stock tickers, it's always in your face. You're always going

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to hear about it immediately. That has always been the case.

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 2>That was true in the nineteen twenties, and today it

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>is even more true because of social media and you're

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 2>getting all this information bombarded at you, and think about

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the value of your house. Most people would not, you know,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>wake up and turn on CNBC and say, what are

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the analysts saying about the value of my house today?

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 2>They just know that the house. You're like, like, look,

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to live here for five or ten years,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>whatever it might be, and I expect the value will

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 2>probably go up. Maybe it goes up a lot, maybe

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>goes up a little. It's not that big of a deal.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>And because there's not a lot of information now, what's

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting is that Zillo, I think, has innocently changed that

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>in the last decade or two, where now people can

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 2>check every day and see if the value of the

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>house went up yesterday on Zillo, like what's the essment

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 2>of this? Oh, oh, we went down ten thousand dollars yesterday.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>What's going on here? And so it's you know, the

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 2>more information you have, the more temptations you have to

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>pull the levers and fiddle with the knobs and try

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>to figure out what the best portfolio solution is. The

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>irony is that people paid less attention to what they're doing,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>they would probably do better over the long run.

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the role of luck in financial outcomes.

0:04:55.680 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>How important is it for investors to recognize the luence

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of serendipity.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, luck, in my description, is just things can happen

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>in the world outside of your control that you have

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>no influence over that have a bigger impact on outcomes

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 2>than anything that you did intentionally. That's what luck is,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.119
<v Speaker 2>and it plays a tremendous role in investing. We don't

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 2>like to talk about it or admit it because if

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 2>I say Barry, you got lucky, I look jealous and bitter.

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>And if I look in the mirror and I say, Morgan,

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>you just got lucky, that's hard to accept as well.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>But to me, you know, there's lots of people who

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 2>will push back on that and say they'll come up

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 2>with quotes and say, oh, the harder I work, the

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>luckier I get to me, that's just not what luck is.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Luck is like, by definition, if you can work harder

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 2>and do better at something, then it's not luck, it's skill.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 2>To me, the biggest elements of luck and investing are where, when,

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and to whom you were born, what generation are you from,

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>what country were you born, and who are your parents.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>You have no control over those things. Nothing you can

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>do to influence that. But investors who you know, were

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 2>born in the nineteen fifties started investing in a very

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 2>different climate with different uppertunities, and investors who started who

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>were born in nineteen seventy or nineteen eighty totally different

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's out of your control. And you know, Bill

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Growth is a great bond investor. I think he's been

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>on your program several times. He made this comment about

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 2>his career perfectly aligned with a forty year collapse in

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>interest rates, which if you're a bond investor, is pretty

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty darn good. Now, look, he did better than other

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 2>bond investors, so it's not to say that was all luck.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 2>But he himself once mentioned he said, look, if he

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>was born twenty years earlier or twenty years later, it

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>would have been a very different career. That is what

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 2>luck is in investing.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>That's an amazing example. So, given the role of luck

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in our lives and how unpredictable things can be, let's

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about flexibility and adaptability. How important is it for

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 1>us to be able to adjust our plans to changing circumstances.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, then give you one example. It's one thing to

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 2>say I'm a long term investor. I'm investing for the

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>next twenty years. That's great. But if you are saying

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm to retire in twenty years, even though that's a

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 2>long term time horizon, basically what you're saying is I

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>need the market to be in my favor in the

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>year twenty forty four. That's what you're saying. If you

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>have a twenty year time horizon, and maybe in twenty

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 2>forty four the market is great, maybe it's not. Maybe

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 2>we're in the middle of the Second Great Depression by then.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>So rather than just a long term time horizon, what

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.559
<v Speaker 2>you want is a flexible time horizon. You want to say, look,

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I hope to retire in about twenty years, and maybe

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll be in a position to sell part of my portfolio.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Then maybe I need to wait a couple years longer.

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I need to work a couple of years longer.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>The more that you need the market in the world

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to align with your specific goals, the more you are

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>relying on bucking chance, and the more that you can

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>be adaptable and flexible to what the market's doing, what

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the economy is doing. The better you have, the better

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>chance you have of putting the odds of success in

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 2>your favor.

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just that we have to leave room

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.559
<v Speaker 1>for error. We also have to leave room for chance

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>when making long term plans.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, imagine if you are someone you are an investor

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen eighties, and you said going to I

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 2>have a long term time horizon. I'm going to retire

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in March of twenty twenty. That's my retirement date. And

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>in March of twenty twenty, I'm going to liquidate half

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 2>my portfolio whatever it might be. If you said that

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen eighties, I was like, oh, great, you

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>have a thirty or forty year time horizon in front

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of you. What happened in March of twenty twenty. The

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 2>world's melting down with COVID, the lockdown's market falls forty

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>five percent whatever it was, and so that's why you

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>need to have a level of flexibility and adaptability. It's

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 2>not just what the economy is doing and what the

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>market's doing. It's you trying to align your specific time

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 2>horizon to a market and an economy that does not

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>know or care what your goals are.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you a simple question that you

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about throughout the book. Does money by happiness?

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I think there's two answers to that question. One is,

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>if you are already a happy person, and you have

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a good marriage, good health, good friends, good disposition, then

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>it can. Absolutely you can use money as a tool

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>to leverage your already happy life. If you are someone

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>who is already depressed and in poor health and don't

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>have good fred connections and hate your job, then by

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and large it will not. And not only will it not,

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>it can actually lead to a source of hopelessness, because

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 2>when you are poor, you might say, if only I

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>had money, all my problems would go away. And then

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>when you might gain money, you gain some wealth, you

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>realize that it doesn't and then you lose your sense

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>of hope. And so that's one part of it. The

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 2>other answer is does it lead to happiness? The answer

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 2>is probably not. Does it lead to contentment? The answer

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 2>is probably yes. Now, contentment is a positive emotion, it's

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a great thing, but it's not happiness. Happiness is waking

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 2>up grinning ear to ear. That's by and large not

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>what money does to people. If you're a very wealthy person,

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, do not wake up laughing, smiling.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just not how it works. But can it lead

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>to a sense of contentment of Look, I've achieved a

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of my goals. I'm really proud of the work

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 2>that I did, and I'm content that I can now

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>live the rest of my days with a sense of independence. Yes,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 2>that's not happiness, but it's a positive emotion that I

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 2>think we should strive for.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about other aspects of money. How should

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>investors think about saving and spending? What kind of practical

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>advice can you give there?

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Kannoman, the great psychologist who passed away not too

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>long ago, He said, the best definition of risk is

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 2>a well calibrated sense of your future regret. You need

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 2>to be understand what you're going to regret ten twenty

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty years in the future, and that's that should you know,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 2>may you know lead to the amount of risks that

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you're going to take. I think it's the same for

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 2>spending and saving. When you're thinking about should I spend

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>money today the kind of like Yolo philosophy, or should

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>I save for tomorrow, save for the rainy day and

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 2>let my money compound. What you need to understand is

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to regret in the future. Are you

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be on your deathbed and look back and say,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I saved all this money and look at all the

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 2>vacations that I didn't take, look at all the all

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 2>the cool cars that I didn't buy. That's a sense

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of regret. You also might live for today and spend

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 2>all your money, and now now you're suddenly you're eighty

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>years old and you don't have any money, and you

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 2>regret that you didn't save. It's different for everybody, and

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 2>you need to have a well calibrated sense of regret.

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you my personal example right now. I have

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 2>two young children and I've been a heavy saver for

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 2>my entire life. If Heaven forbid, I were on my

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>deathbed tomorrow, I would not regret in the slightest that

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I have saved all this money because I would take

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 2>so much pleasure knowing that my wife and kids will

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>be taken care of because I saved. Now, Will I

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>still think that when I'm eighty years old and hopefully

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>my kids are established and earning their own money. Of

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>course I might. At that point, I might regret that

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm eighty years old and saved all this money that

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I could have spent otherwise. So it changes throughout your

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 2>own individual life as well.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of surprising to me. We're ninety percent

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>through this discussion and we really haven't talked about investing

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>very much. What are the keys to being a successful

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>long term investor?

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of it is understanding how common

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and normal and unavoidable volatility is. It's so common that

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 2>even professional investors when the market falls ten twenty thirty

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 2>percent have a sense they respond to it with the

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 2>idea that the market is broken, that like, this is

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent of a car accident or a plane falling

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>out of the sky, and you need to take a

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 2>critical action right now because you know it's bad. And

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>by and large that's not the case. The vast majority

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 2>of even severe volatility is completely normal and unavoidable, and

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 2>if you're a student of market history, it happens way

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>more often than people like to think. And so what

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>you're getting paid for as an investor is the ability

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 2>to put up with and endure uncertainty and volatility. That's

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 2>the cost of admission. And when you view it like that,

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>then when you do have a big bat of volatility,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 2>even that might last for years, it's not fun, you

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 2>don't enjoy it, but you say to yourself, this is

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the cost of admission for earning higher returns that I

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>could earn in bonds or cash over the long run.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And our final question, why is it that getting wealthy

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and staying wealthy are such different skill sets?

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 2>Getting wealthy, I think requires being an optimist, optimistic about yourself,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about the economy, taking a risk. Staying wealthy is

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 2>like the exact opposite. You need to be a little

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>bit pessimistic and paranoid, and you need to admit to

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>yourself and acknowledge that all of economic history is a

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>constant chain of setbacks and surprises and recessions and bear

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>markets and pandemics that you need to be able to

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>endure for your long term optimism to actually pay off

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>in the end.

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So to wrap up, to succeed in markets as an investor,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand the psychology of money. You have

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to understand why it's not just about knowledge or math

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or even computer programming, but highly dependent on your behavior.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Get your behavior in the control and you're ninety percent

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the way there. I'm Barry Rdults. You've been listening

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>to At the Money on Bloomberg Radio. Knowledge of the

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Hodge round Round