WEBVTT - Behind the Curtain: The Science of the Grammys - Lab 124

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm t T and I'm Zakiah and this is Dope Labs.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Dope Labs, a weekly podcast that mixes hardcore

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>science with pop culture and a healthy dose of friendship.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>The Grammys are in a week on February first. Who

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think is taking home like Best New Artist? No,

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anybody I like to take on Best

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>New Artists. I want them to have like Album of

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Year. I hear you, I hear you. Our boy

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Leon Thomas. You yes, you've mentioned him a few times

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show. He's up for Best New Artists. He

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is not new to us, you know, right, And that

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>made me start thinking, like how does all of this work?

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Because you've been talking about Leon Thomas for a long time,

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and I remember Leon Thomas from like Victorious, you know,

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Disney channelist stuff like that, and so I'm like,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>he's not new, but the Grammys are saying he's new,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that makes me question a lot of things

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that comes to these awards ceremonies. Yes, you know, I

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's time we lift the curtain and say what's

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>going on with the awards. The Grammys specifically let's jump

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>into the recitation. So what do we know? I know,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Grammys and low key, a lot of awards shows

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like they are removed from what I personally am feeling.

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You talked about. Leon Thompson doesn't feel like a new

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>artist to me, but he's up for new artists there,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like when it comes to that kind

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, the only award I really trust to be

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>for the people and by the people is a Teen

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Choice Awards at Nickelodeon. Okay, that's it. They always get

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it right and they get into the slime just right.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Oh my gosh.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of huge artists that are

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>highly decorated and get a lot of Grammy Awards, but

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>then there's also like this other murky side where there's snubs,

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and the snubs you feel impersonal and I don't know

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>how this works out. I'm like, who, wait before we

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>start jumping into the questions. Let's okay, let's figure out

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what we want to know. And so my very first

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>question is who are these people? Who is the academy?

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It feels very like Illuminati, but it's not because I

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>think you can find out who's a part of the Academy.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>We just never see these people, and so who are they?

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>How are they chosing? I like to take the Academy.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Who is that? How do they choose the nominees? Yeah,

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and how do they decide who goes into what category?

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked with cold before kol Kushna about

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>genre and categories, and new categories are popping up every year.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>How do they decide? Yeah, somebody like Doci, it's hard

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to put her in just rap. She does, she does singing,

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>she does rap, she does pop like, she does a

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of different types of music within her music. And

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know how they make those decisions. And

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 1>so that's when we start to get into snubs, and

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the snubs are feeling personal, and I begin upset and

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I will turn the TV off. I don't care where

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we are in the award show. If the person who

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like should get it doesn't get I'm like, man,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I'm not watching with you. You need to

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>learn to control your emotions.

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Leave the TV on, turn the TV off, turn the

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 3>TV off, turn the TV off, turn the TV off.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 3>To answer all of our burning questions, because you can

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>see we have a lot we reached out to Sydney Madden.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Hi, my name is Sidney Madden. I'm a music and

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 4>cultural critic for the.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>People like me, like Zukiya, who only see the red carpet?

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you can you explain what the Recording Academy is,

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>who are they and what the Grammys represent.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 4>The Recording Academy and the Grammys were created back in

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 4>nineteen fifty eight, and it was an award created to

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 4>recognize professionals, musicians and people working in the music industry,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 4>almost as an alternative because their qualifications wouldn't allow them

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 4>to get a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 4>It's very much an accolade that has come to have

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 4>more meaning as time has gone on, but it's definitely

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 4>on the pomp and circumstance type beat. It is an

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 4>achievement unlike any other in the music industry because it

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 4>touts itself as the only award that is purely peer voted.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 4>There are other award shows all throughout the year when

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 4>it comes to music and entertainment.

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 2>So if you think about the.

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Mtvvmas, the BET Awards, or the American Music Awards, those

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 4>are awards based on streams or commercial numbers, selling numbers,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 4>or just pop culture relevance and a publications co sign

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 4>of an artist. But the are fashioned as the only,

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 4>or I should say one of the only, because now

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 4>we have the Latin Grammys and the CMA.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Is the Country Music Awards.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 4>It really just marks the top of the mountaintop in

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 4>the music industry because you have all of these people,

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 4>all of these voting members of the Recording Academy, going

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>into their specific genre and giving you an official co

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>sign of your art.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>That you submit.

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>So it just has this relevance and reverberation in culture

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 4>because it is supposed to be the pinnacle of peer

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 4>reviewed art and recognition.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. We have something like that in science, whereas

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>peer reviewed I.

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Was gonna say, I was lucky, gonna say, there's very

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 4>few things that can eclipse the Grammys. And if you

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 4>think about it, it's like, yeah, maybe we'ren't winning a Pulitzer,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 4>which one of our Grammy nominees that we're going to

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 4>talk about this year has already been.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 2>But he hasn't one album of the air, but he's

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>won a Pulitzer.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So very interesting. I noticed you were saying, like Academy

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>members first of all, I think it's great because you

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>gave us that history. There's an understanding of like the

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Grimmers weren't always the only game in town and now

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they're at the top. But when we talk about that

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>peer review, who are like the Academy members and what

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do you have to do to get into that field?

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Like who says like, okay, we deem you worthy to

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>be an Academy member or can you or do you apply?

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's definitely tears in the Recording Academy and to

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 4>be an Academy member. You can be an Academy member,

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 4>but that doesn't mean you get to vote on the Grammys.

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 4>To be a voting member in the Recording Academy, you

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 4>have to be a music maker. So you have to

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 4>be an artist yourself, a songwriter, an engineer, a record exect,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 4>a manager. You have to be someone who works in

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 4>the music industry very actively, who opts into Recording Academy

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 4>activities and buys into the Recording Academy all year round,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 4>and I mean like buying culturally. And I think there

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 4>is a dues process that goes along with it as well.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 4>But you have to be an active member in good

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 4>standing and you have to be someone who touches music

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 4>at some point, you have to be someone who creates

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 4>music and puts it out in the world or has

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 4>a hand in it.

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting because I thought it would be like

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of like old folks, because sometimes the people

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>who win, I'm like, who does that hurt?

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 4>That was low key a problem for a long time,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 4>and that was a big critique of the Grammys. Like

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 4>a long running critique of the Grammy Awards is that

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 4>it's often behind the times.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Of what is actually covering, which is the music industry.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 4>So someone like Chance the rapper being the first person

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 4>to ever be nominated off a mixtape when we know

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 4>in hip hop mixtapes have been around since like the

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 4>inception of the whole art former culture and genre. Or

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm reminded of when the former CEO of the Recording Academy,

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Neil Portneau said in twenty eighteen, women aren't getting nominated

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 4>enough for the Grammys because women need to quote unquote

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 4>step up in creating their music, which.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Is ridiculous, I mean sexist.

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Number one and just wrong because pop women in pop

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 4>and R and B ran the twenty tens, and he

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 4>said that in twenty eighteen, and he got a lot

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 4>of flak for that. I know, artists like Mariana Grande

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 4>called him out very explicitly for the sexist overtones of

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 4>that statement. And I think there has been a conscious

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 4>effort and a shift to diversify the voting pool in

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 4>the last few years. Neil is not no longer the CEO,

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 4>and the new CEO is a black man. There's new

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 4>black music coalitions that work within the Recording Academy, and

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 4>there's been a push to get younger, more diversified people

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 4>in the voting pool. Because what happens with the process

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 4>of even being nominated is you, as an artist or

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 4>a label or a management company, you submit for nominations right,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 4>and then it goes through whole checks and balances process

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 4>where people who are considered genre experts they have to

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 4>decide if you're submitting in the correct genre. And so

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 4>if the genre experts who are doing these checks and

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 4>balances aren't really someone who has their finger on the

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 4>pulse of what's happening in that genre contemporarily, that's why

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 4>a lot of stuff gets filtered through the wrong ways,

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's why a lot of things sometimes fall through

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 4>the cracks and become ineligible. But I think with diversifying

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 4>the voting pool in the last few years, we've started

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 4>to see somewhat of a shift in the categories and

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 4>ultimately in who wins.

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That's so interesting. Yeah, because I used to think ineligibility.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, they must have had too many samples,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like that is all I thought before.

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, no, I mean it's not really I should say, like,

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 4>as a disclaimer, I'm not a voting member of the Academy,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 4>so I'm just saying this from a purely reported point

0:09:58.840 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 4>of view.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I know, for example, this year, there's going to be like.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Ninety five categories being voted on, and two of the

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 4>new categories being introduced this year are Best Traditional Country

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 4>Album and Best Album Cover. So you can see how

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 4>the Recording Academy is starting to evolve with things that

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 4>hold so much cultural capital and cultural residence in these

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 4>specific genres. But also you can see where these delineations

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 4>are being made. After Beyonce finally one Album of the

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Year for Cowboy Carter last year, they're starting to be

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 4>even more specifications in what is considered a traditional country

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 4>album and a contemporary country album and you see those

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 4>goalposts being moved very often in the face of a

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 4>big industry shaking win like Beyonce had last year after

0:10:54.920 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 4>so many years of not getting AOTY.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>When you said that new category for traditional Country, that's

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly what popped into my head. I was like, this

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>feels like a direct response to Cowboy Carter, which is

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>so unfortunate because I mean, they're saying the quiet part

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are aloud essentially, and it's really disheartening because that was

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a country album. I don't understand what the problem is.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>She's from Texas, like, she knows this music, she has

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the co sign of some of the country music greats

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on her album, and it just seems like the industry

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>itself is pushing back on that.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 4>When she finally won for Cowboy Carter in twenty twenty five,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 4>first of all, it was a direct response to Jay

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Z calling out the Recording Academy in their own house

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty four saying, this is one of the

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 4>greatest artists of our whole lifetime and she's never one

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Album of the Year.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>World year, so even by your holy mestrige, that doesn't work.

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 4>And she finally won, it felt like a bit of

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 4>a bitter sweet moment because it really should have been

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 4>for self titled. It really should have been for lemonade.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 4>It really really really should have been for lemonade.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 2>But now the fact that.

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 4>She has that long sought after accolade to her name,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people were like, Okay, well now she

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 4>can rest, what could she do next? And I'm like,

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 4>we're still not actorly till out, first of all, And secondly,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of the idea that she once after so

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 4>long that goes back to the point I was saying

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 4>before of sometimes the voting members being behind and not

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 4>really having their finger on the pulse of what's happening

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 4>in their genres and what's happening in these fan bases,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 4>and what this music is doing to move whole communities,

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 4>whole countries. With this usic is doing to shine a

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 4>light on people who never have felt empowered in these

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 4>spaces before, right like what Cowboy Carter did to empower

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>black people who love country but never felt welcome in

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 4>the country space. Ironically, because country is a black and

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 4>indigenous art form like so many other things in the

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 4>United States of America, So shining a light on that disparity,

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 4>shining a light on the irony and the racism baked

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 4>into a whole genre over time, but also low key

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 4>doing some things that let's say like play by the rules,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 4>having that Dolly part and co sign, having that Willie

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Nelson be the DJ, be the smoked out DJ. Those

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 4>are all very by the book moves that not only

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 4>made it this stamp of the flag and this dissertation

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 4>of a body of work, but also showed like, see,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 4>these are the greats.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>And they say, I'm undeniable. So what you gonna say?

0:13:59.240 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 4>And I think in her winning for Cowboy Carter after

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 4>all of this time, if we are not explicit and

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 4>distinct and even repetitive, listen a hit dog will holler,

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 4>there's a possibility that it can now become revisionist history

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 4>that she wasn't denied that accolade for so long on

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 4>a prejudice of her not playing by the rules according

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 4>to the music industry standards.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>You know what I'm saying.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I think about that a lot when we're getting into

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 4>this year's nominees, with Kendrick Lamar being going into the

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 4>ceremony being the most nominated artist again, I mean that's

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 4>not an anomaly for him. Every time he drops an album,

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 4>he comes through the next year being one of the

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 4>most nominated artists, if not the most nominated. You know,

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>if Taylor Swift and him don't drop the same year,

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 4>he's going to be the most nominated. I think he's

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 4>actually the only solo artist to have every single one

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 4>of his five consecutive albums be nominated for Album of

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 4>the Year, but he's never won it. And going back

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 4>to what I said earlier, this man got a Politzer Prize.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>But I've never won an Album of the Year.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 4>It's just those anomalies and those quiet laugh to keep

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 4>from crying type ironies that are baked into the Awards

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 4>show every year that I'm always on the lookout for.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 4>I think it's gonna happen very much again with the

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 4>storyline of Bad Bunny and dba's photos.

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to happen with.

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 4>I pause to say it, but kind of like Redemption

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:42.359
<v Speaker 4>arc of Justin Bieber and him being experimental and unabashed

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 4>in his R and B and like almost indie rock space.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 4>But that goes into everything I'm saying. The Grammys represent

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 4>playing the long game in the music industry. That's, you know,

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.479
<v Speaker 4>if you want to go really macro and broad spectrum

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 4>with it. The person who when the Grammy is not

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 4>necessarily the person who makes the album or who makes.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 2>The song or the art that moves the culture.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 4>It's the person and the machine around them who play

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the game, who are very strategic and methodical and scientific

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 4>about telling the story that goes along.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>With the music.

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 4>The idea that this is one night when everybody is

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 4>just tuning in and you can get put onto some

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 4>new music, you can learn about new artists. It's one

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 4>night if you're not consciously looking at music the music

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 4>industry all year long.

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>But for anyone who's ever putting out an.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Album, whether that's on a major label or an indie

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 4>distribution deal, or you're one hundred percent just indie yourself,

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 4>if a label wants to go for the Grammy, they

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 4>are baking that Grammy strategy and that campaign to get

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 4>you a Grammy. They're baking that into the role out

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 4>plan before the public ever even hears the music.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 2>It's that methodical.

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this is such a good point because when

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you just tune in, it feels like an upset when

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you're like, this album was everywhere in my community. Everybody

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>was talking about it. Everybody was saving up to go

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to the concerts and to see the tour. And then

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you see it that it doesn't get recognized, but you've

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just outlined that it's not just was it on the

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>tip of everybody's tongue? Was everybody reciting these lyrics? Was

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>it a hashtag all over? You know, you're telling us

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of you're peeling the curtain back a little bit

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and showing us like that there are campaigns that already.

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, that introduces to me so much bias, because

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who can campaign? What does a campaign even look like?

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Money?

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 4>Money, money, and connects, money connects power.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>It's very similar to Hollywood.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I think about, like what's happening with Sinners right now?

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 4>We know that Sinners was the movie of twenty twenty five.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>We all know that.

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 4>That's not hyperbolieve like it was a box office smash,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 4>was a cult phenomenon. It's gonna go down as a

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 4>cult classic. It's inspired academic studies.

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 2>It's inspired so many people.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 4>To even get into screenwriting because of the ascension of

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Ryan Coogler and his evolution from going from small budgets

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 4>to Marvel Movies to now owning his voice and his

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 4>artistry outright with it, right, like we know what it

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 4>is right that is undeniable, and yet you're going to

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 4>see over and over the kind of like the disappointment

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 4>and it be passed over for other movies that came

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 4>out this year, that came out on a bigger studio,

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 4>or had a bigger budget, or just have the right people,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 4>the right agents, the right lobbyists, honestly, Like that's what

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 4>it is like. You're lobbying for these awards every single

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 4>time you have the right people in your corner. I

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 4>think of a lot about how honestly, it's like a

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>pattern that happens in Hollywood a lot like a Nora,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 4>for example, the studio behind a Nora, they spent more

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 4>money campaigning for Mikey Madden listen, to get that oscar

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 4>and to sweep the award show then it even costs

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 4>to make the movie, you know what I mean. It's

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 4>all like people kind of in the movie business, like

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>you big that into post production, the marketing of it,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the schmoozing that has to happen, the campaigning that has

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 4>to happen to get an Oscar is that behind the

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 4>scenes work that so many people who are just a

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 4>casual moviegoer or just a casual music listener they never see.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 4>But it's very methodical, and there are people whose whole

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 4>job it is to just tap in and check in

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 4>with Recording Academy members and see, like start conversations and

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 4>keep conversations going about the validity of the album, about

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 4>the artistic vision, about the technical proficiency on display, about

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 4>the production value, all of these things. It's a strategy.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 4>It's very political.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about the Grammys and now you're talking

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>more like movies and like the Academy Awards, And this

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>is something that means a Keia actually talked about like

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think yesterday the day before when Tianna Taylor won

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Globe for one battle and after another, and

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we're also proud of her, but then you think of

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this machine and then people saying, oh, she wasn't really

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that good. It's like there's this tension there where it's

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>like we want the recognition and so how are we

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to feel about this Tiana Taylor Golden Globe? Was

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it the right person? Was it the machine?

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 4>The role?

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Yo, don't even get me started on that, because

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 4>the two truths can exist at the same time. Tianna Taylor,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 4>we know, we followed her career. This is definitely a

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 4>crowning moment for her. That is kicking the door of

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood in for her. But we know what she's been

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 4>capable of from jump. Really, if we don't talk about

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 4>real art, she should have won something for one thousand

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 4>and one, Yeah, twenty twenty four, Yes, like that's really

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 4>what it should have been. But that portrayal of black

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 4>womanhood and perseverance and resilience and quiet beauty and just strength,

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 4>they don't, like, that's not really what be rising to

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 4>the top in Hollywood. And that's that's the disparity of it.

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 4>It's like, yeah, she's gonna play this over sex, gunslinging

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Trader and she's honestly like the super nova in the movie.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>She's she's not even in majority of the movie. And

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, the script is written.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 4>Written by white guy, so obviously he's not going to

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 4>be able to have the dimension of the character that

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 4>you want. But so the true truths can't exist. She

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 4>can absolutely deserve the Golden Globe and this crowning moment

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 4>in her career and this arrival in a new space.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 2>But for us who've always known her and who've always

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 2>known her as.

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 4>A champion of black womanhood, it can also feel very

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 4>tenuous because we know what she's capable of, we know

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 4>what she represents she we know who she talks to.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that's why she I think that's why she

0:21:58.160 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 4>said that in her acceptance speech.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 2>But it is a very classic pattern in.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood that the black roles that actually win the biggest

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 4>awards are the roles that showcase abuse, or are pandering

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 4>or very stereotypical. I think you think of Lupita Niango

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 4>and Twelve Years a Slave. You think of Halle Berry,

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 4>who's literally the only black women in the history of

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 4>the entire Academy Awards to win the Oscar, and she

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 4>went it for Monsters Ball, not like Dorothy Dandres.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 2>You know what I'm saying. It's a classic pattern.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Same thing for Denzel, Like Denzel winning for Training Day Again,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 4>he was the villain.

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't that complex in that movie.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 4>He acted the hell out of the role and we

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 4>remember him for it, But there are so many other

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 4>roles he's chosen over the years in his filmography that

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 4>represent us and our versatility, our beauty, our strength.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 2>But like that's not what Holly is about.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, there has to be a payoff, right for

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>people to spend this much money on the art, for

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 1>people to spend this much money on the campaigning, more

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>money on the campaigning than the art. Sometimes, like you

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just told us about what's the payoff? When you win

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>an award like a Grammy.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 2>A Grammy is special for a few reasons. Like I

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>said before, it's the.

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 4>Only award as a musician that you can tell that

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 4>really says. It's peer reviewed and peer voted, and it's

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 4>like recognized by a jury of your peers of your

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 4>excellence in your artistry, like the master of your artistry.

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 4>So that's why it hits a little different, because it's

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 4>like people you know who work within your spaces all

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 4>the time are giving you that co sign and giving

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 4>you that recognition. And secondly, it's one of the most

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 4>recognizable awards internationally. So like I was saying before, you

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 4>can win You can win a BET award, you could

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 4>win a VMA, but those are based on the publications

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 4>themselves or the networks themselves, and they still exist in

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 4>a smaller cultural bubble. A Grammy exceeds all that.

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 4>For example, last year, one of the big breakout stars.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Was Chapel Roone.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, you think about it, like a lot of people

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 4>didn't even know who Chapelerone was until she won that Grammy. Right,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 4>this is when you got to remember, like we all

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 4>do live in our own feedback loops, because I knew

0:24:54.119 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 4>who chapelone was twenty nineteen, but I also work I

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 4>worked at MPR, right like that, the it was my

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 4>job to know these things, right, And then she had

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 4>a tiny desk that went a little viral. But again

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 4>it's still little pockets, it's still little bubbles. All of

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, if you want a Grammy, you could be

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 4>on a you could be on the cover of a

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 4>magazine and somebody like who would never have heard of

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 4>her before, is now gonna hurt. It's a platform and

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 4>a level of promotion that is.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Unlike anything else.

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 4>You don't win a cash prize, but it's one of

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 4>the biggest stages you're ever going to be on.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, similar to the super Bowl.

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 4>You don't get paid to do the super Bowl, but

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 4>the payoff tenfold is you get to save for the

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 4>rest of your life. You are a Grammy winner, you

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 4>are a Super Bowl halftime performer.

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those accolades.

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 4>That like, it'll never get it'll never get old, it'll

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 4>always ring bells, that.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Gramophone will never lose its tarnish.

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna hold value well after the years of you.

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Being on the top of the charts or whatever it

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 2>may be.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 4>It solidifies you as as a great in your as

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 4>a legend. And I say that kind of with the

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 4>asterisks in a caveat, because to me, it's not the

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 4>only thing that can solidify you as a legend and

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 4>as a culture shifter. I always think about how Bob Marley,

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 4>who is one of the biggest artists of any time,

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 4>not our time, not our generation, past generations. I've traveled

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 4>all over the world and I say, I'm Jamaican, and

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, oh, Bob Marley, Like that's what it is

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 4>and what he did for the entire genre of reggae,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Like we're going to be feeling those reverberations for the

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 4>rest of our lives and well after. You know, he

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 4>didn't win a Grammy in his lifetime, so it's not

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 4>the only marker of success. It's not the only thing

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 4>that stamps to you as an icon. But for people

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 4>again who are casual listeners, it is really that stamp

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 4>of approval that is gonna just put you over the top.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 4>It really matters about what you do after it, like

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 4>that level of ascension that you work towards after the

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Grammy to keep that spot and to keep that prevalence.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 4>But it's so much about I think that is so

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 4>much about your own artistic stretching and your own aspiration

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 4>to keep climbing and doing more.

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>After that, you're able to see the cracks in the

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Grammys that the casual viewer might not end in the

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>music industry as a whole. So for you, if you

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>were designing like the sid Man Grammys, how's it looking?

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>What's different or is it the same?

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, that is such a hard question. Okay.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 4>The big critique I have is that the Grammys move

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot slower than the culture does, and in erecting

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 4>their icons, in signaling who's actually shifting things, who's actually

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 4>moving the needle when it comes to music and evolution

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 4>and pushing envelopes. It's kind of like when news breaks

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 4>in the first place you're looking is TikTok or x

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 4>or Instagram.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 2>We're looking in the palm of our hands.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 4>And then hours and hours later we're going to see

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 4>it on the eleven o'clock news. That's how it feels

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 4>a lot of times with the Grammys, accepted things a

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 4>bit more because you know, we care so much about

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 4>our fandoms. You know, the music is so important to us.

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 4>It's the soundtrack of our lives. So the category, for example,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 4>the category is Best New Artists. I always watch that

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 4>one and I gotta take it with a grain of

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 4>salt because the only precursor to being a Best New

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Artist is you never have to have been nominated for

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 4>Grammy before. So there's artists in that cat Yeah, Like

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 4>that's the So everyone in the Best New Artists category

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 4>this year and every other year, it's like we might

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 4>have known about them for us like huge fandoms, but

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 4>they finally when they finally like break in the industry

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 4>and they have a moment, then they are nominated for

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 4>the Grammy. And it's like, if you're nominated in Best

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 4>New Artists, now you could be dominating all those other categories.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 4>So the only requirement to be in Best New Artists

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:00.040
<v Speaker 4>is you.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>You have never been nominated for a Grammy before.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 4>So people in the past, like Sabrina Carpenter, she was

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 4>nominated for Best New Artists in last year's ceremony when

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 4>she had dropped four or five albums at this point.

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 4>Going into this year's ceremony, Olivia Dean. This is her

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 4>sophomore album and it blew up and it really helped

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 4>her crossover and explode in the American market this year.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 4>But if you are a super fan of British soul,

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 4>British R and B, like she's been in the rotation

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot, I guess one thing I would change is

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 4>I would get rid of Besting Artist because honestly, what

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 4>even makes an artist new anymore? There's so much music

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 4>being uploaded to streaming services all the time. The bar

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 4>for discovery is a forever moving target, right, So that

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 4>idea that you're now new because the Grammy's finally heard

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 4>of you because the industry started to move their bells

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 4>and whistles for you, I would definitely get rid of that.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I did want to talk a little bit about out

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.479
<v Speaker 1>your hopes for winners in the Grammys this year. Like

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>some of your I don't want to say predictions, more

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so who you feel like should be getting that Grammy

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for a Record of the Year. Who do you think

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>should win?

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me look it up.

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's DTMF, Bad Bunny, Man Child, Sabrina Carpenter, Anxiety, Dochi, Wildflower,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Billie Eilish, Abracadabra, Lady Gaga, Luther, Kendrick, Kumar with Sizza,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Subway, Chapelerone and apt Rose and Bruno Mars. There's

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so many nominees, my goodness.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 2>A lot of nominees.

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 4>The nominee ballads have gotten bigger over the years, and

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 4>even like I said at the top, this year is

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be ninety five categories.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.719
<v Speaker 2>That's the most categories it's ever been. It's very stacked

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>up this year.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I okay, who who should win versus who probably will win?

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Y'all don't make bets off me.

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 4>I think who should win is Bad Bunny. I think

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 4>who's likely to win is Billie Eilish, Kendrick or Lady Gaga.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Because one, you could say number one, Billy Eilish is

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 4>a Grammys darling right her and Phineas they're locked in

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 4>as songwriters. So it's like going back to the argument

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 4>we said before. Once you win, they keep you winning, right,

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Lady Gaga, this album, the myth making and the storytelling

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 4>around this album was very big all year, and like

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 4>I said, she had a huge headlining tour. Kendrick Kendrick

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 4>is going into the Grammys as the most nominated act,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 4>and I think this collab with Sizza is one of

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 4>the most pop leaning but also true to form collabse

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 4>he ever done. It's like the perfect mix of airplay

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 4>but still keeping his artistry and keeping what makes him,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 4>keeping that sauce intact. But Bad Bunny, Bad Bunny as

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 4>a record, all the songs as an album, just what it.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Did culturally this year.

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 4>I just first of all, I love when an artist

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 4>finally gets in that flow state and accomplishes what they've

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 4>been trying to do.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>For a really long time.

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Like Bad Bunny in the Reggaetone space has evolved the

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 4>space so much. He has never compromised promoting his culture.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 4>He never started to try and sing in English to

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 4>cross over. He continuously has put on for Puerto Rico

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 4>and the West Indian diaspora. So what he did in

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 4>this album to kind of champion so many of the

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 4>genres that have come out of Puerto Rico, the cultural currency,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 4>just like the richness of his culture. And also call

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the fact that there's so much displacement and gentrification happening

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 4>on his island in very rapid secession and the aftermath

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 4>of Hurricane Maria all the way till now, and the

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 4>fact that again he's about to perform at the super Bowl.

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 4>He had this insane record breaking residency in Puerto Rico

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 4>that stimulated the economy of his island. On purpose, he

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 4>made the cognizant effort to not tour in the US

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 4>after so many years of touring in the US for

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 4>a few different reasons, one of the reasons being he

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 4>didn't want it to he didn't want it to be

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 4>a hotbed for no ice raids.

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>The fact that this is one of the biggest.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Albums coming out of the US at the same time

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 4>that these ice raids and this crackdown on the Latin

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 4>community in the US has reaching its boiling point.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Like that dichotomy is historic.

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 4>This is what I'm talking about when it's like these

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 4>are culture shifting moments. You know, He's made such a

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 4>nod to show respect to his elders, to his cultural lineage.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>All the music that's coming out of Puerto Rico.

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 4>He sharpened that line between the New Yorrican like New

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 4>York Puerto Rico pipeline. He's invigorated so many people's interests

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 4>in Puerto Rican culture. He stimulated the economy, like these

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 4>are things that are actually gonna eclipse the Grammys the.

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 2>One night of the Grammys.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 4>But it would be amazing to have the icing on

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the top to win the Grammy, to like to have

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 4>that be part of the run. It's not the album

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 4>with the most socio political and cultural impact or that

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 4>makes the biggest ripple. That's not always the one that

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 4>does win for Record of the Year, Song of the

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Year album.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 2>But in my opinion, that's who should win.

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 4>If we're really making it about the artistry and the

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 4>power of what music can do, that's who should win.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I like the reasoning, and honestly, this lab has illuminated

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>so much for me. It helped me get out of

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>my own feelings. I was never at the p like

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>utt where I wanted to turn the TV off, but

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I have been disappointed in the past. But I think

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a little bit more context now, absolutely, and

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it what Sidney, what you were able to do during

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>this lab was really show that there is a science

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to awards. There's a science to all of these big

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>awards that are given out, and that's something that we

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all just need to keep in mind as we are

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>not only consuming music, to not let these awards make

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>us feel like, oh, if our person doesn't get this award,

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>then that means something about how good they are. It

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean a thing because, like you were saying, Sydney

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is not really based on the fans. It's based off

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of the academy. These people who you know, work in

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the music industry, and so you know, you got to

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just take all of these awards with a grain of salt.

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Respect to the Grammys, but we're sprinkling salt on top

0:35:54.800 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of you. Season it up. You can find us on

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>X and Instagram at Dope Labs podcast. You can find

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>me tt on X, Threads and Instagram at dr Underscore

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>t Sho, and you can find zakiya at Ze said so.

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Dope Labs is a production of Lemonada Media. Our supervising

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>producer is Keegan Zemma. Dope Labs is sound designed, edited,

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and mixed by James sparber Lemonada's Senior Vice President of

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Content and Production is Jackie Danziger. Executive producer from iHeart

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast is Katrino. Norvil Marketing lead is Alison Kanter. Original

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>music composed and produced by Taka Yatsuzawa and Alex suki Ura,

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>with additional music by Elijah Harvey. Dope Labs is executive

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>produced by us T T Show Dia and Zakiah Wattley.