WEBVTT - BI Weekend: GM, Starbucks, UPS Earnings (Podcast)

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 2>How do you think the FED is looking at tariffs?

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>The uncertainty of terriffs.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at the sectors and how they performed.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>A lot of investors getting whip saled every day by news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Events, breaking market headlines, and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Could we see a market disruption of market events?

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>So people just too exuberant out there?

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 3>You see some so called low quality stocks driving this

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 3>short term rally.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 2>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 2>business story is impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries are analysts covered worldwide.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at why the chip giant Envidia invested

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>two billion dollars more in the AI cloud computing startup

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Core Week.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Plus a look at why a turnaround planet the coffee

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 3>giant Starbucks is starting to take hold.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>But first we begin in the auto sector this week,

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>General Motors release earnings that eat analysts expectations.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>The company also said it expects profits to grow as

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 3>much as two billion dollars this year and plans to

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>return more of that money to shareholders with a higher

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>dividend and buybacks for.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 2>More We were joined by Steve Man Bloomerg Intelligence, Global

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Autos and Industrials analyst.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 3>We began by asking Steve to break down GM's EV

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>versus gas engine portfolio.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's actually ice engine is much greater. I know

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 4>they have a full portfolio of EV's, but you're talking

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 4>about like eighty five ninety percent ICE versus ten fifteen

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>percent evs. So you know they do have a big portfolio,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 4>but it was just at the beginning of rolling them out.

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, they do have still they do still have

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 4>one more major rollout coming out, which is the Chevy

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Bolt of smaller vehicles, which the industry and GM thinks

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 4>that that's where the market is going, a cheaper, more

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 4>convenient ev Steve.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>It's almost to the point where the street rewards these

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>companies if they not just not fully back away, but

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>at least slow down the evolution to evs and just

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>focus on what's making money today? Is that kind of

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>what where the industry is today?

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, like Trump actually did the auto industry a

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 4>major favor by relaxing the miles per gallon the mandate.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 4>So basically every vehicle in the Big Three's portfolio are

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 4>currently meeting those mandates. And what it means is less

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 4>penalties right and no need to buy EV credits going forward,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 4>huge savings. And what that means is it could translate

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 4>into a slower increase in car prices for consumers, especially

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 4>for big trucks. Makes the big trucks a lot more

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 4>attractive to sell for the Big Three, So they're going

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 4>to sell as many as possible given this opportunity. I

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 4>know we talked about hybrid for GM, it's going to

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 4>be a huge a sinkhold for them if they invest

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 4>in that technology today. So let's let's not do that.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Maintain whatever they can do with evs and really push

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 4>the ice vehicles.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Maintain what they can with ev so that you know,

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>small ten to fifteen percent of their overall portfolio. Forget

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 3>about hybrids and just focus on the mammoth gas guzzling vehicles.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 3>What happens then if gas prices do turn up higher unexpectedly,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>and I know that the administration is doing all it

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>can to prevent that from happening. But I'm looking at

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>triple A gas prices and they bottomed at around two

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>seventy nine and have now made their way back up

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 3>towards two ninety.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean historically, when gas prices go up, it does

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>impact ice sales, and you know, it may it may

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 4>push some buyers into evs, you know, depending on how

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 4>how where the expansion of the EV charging network is at.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 4>But I think at the end of the day, if

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 4>gas prices do go up, actually benefits the Japanese companies

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>like Toyota and Honda, where they have a full suite

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 4>of hybrid vehicles that actually consumer love.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I just leased the Honda CRV hybrid. Uh huh, my son,

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 2>your drives in California all the time where the gas is.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Really expert Yes, that's right. He probably wanted it. And

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>how often does he have to fill up?

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Not that often? I mean, just not that often. It's great,

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a great tech technology.

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Steve.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's just while we got you here, what's the call

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:26.679
<v Speaker 2>these days on Tesla as we talk about this EV business?

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>But really, for Tesla, we're talking about so so much more.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, looking at GM as a as a backdrop, you

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 4>know GM's earnings for twenty twenty six is probably a

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 4>little bit light. There's probably some more upside on the

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 4>shift mix for more ice. So what means for Tesla

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 4>it's an uphill battle for them. I know the stock

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 4>is trading, you know, at an astronomical valuation at the moment.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Investors are very focused on their robo taxi, this vehicle

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 4>build out. Uh. They people feel that, you know, they

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 4>can actually outcompete the likes of Uber and Lyft. So

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, sales will be weak in the fourth quarter

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 4>for Tesla, but I believe the you know, the investors

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 4>are actually looking over past that into you know, what

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 4>is the what is the catalyst or what is what

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 4>is Elon Musk going to talk about in their next

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 4>earning calls on the Robotaxi.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's always about the Elon Musk narrative, his vision

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 3>going forward of what this company is going to be.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I wonder, you know, my Mary Barrow talked about the

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>charging infrastructure in the network and how we're not there

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. Tesla is offering the supercharger and

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>that's part of its business model to be able to

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>make that charger available to other automakers. How big a

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>contributor is that to its revenue, to its profitability when

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>it's prob.

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's still it's still a small amount. It is. Uh.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 4>What they do is they want to expand that business.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 4>So they are talking to you know, gas stations like

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 4>wah wah out in Pennsylvania are actually you know, buying superchargers,

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 4>installing it into next to the gas pumps and next

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 4>to the stations. So they are trying to expand it

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 4>in terms of charging, selling these supercharging business and in

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 4>the in the revenues from the charging, it's still really

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 4>really small. I would say around ten percent, maybe less.

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, what do we know about how important are incentives here?

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I look at other countries around the world and they

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>have got these huge EVY percentages of China sales China,

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the Nordic countries. How important are government incentives to get there?

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>It is very important.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the Germans are actually putting back the incentives

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 4>and it has lifted ev sales in Europe, in Germany.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 4>But at the end of the day, you really want

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 4>to build a sustainable growth environment for these cars, and

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Mary Barr is right. You know, we actually publish a

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 4>very extensive report on ev charging, comparing charging network in

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 4>the US versus China night and day, right, So you know,

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>it's about convenience, it's about costs for the US consumer.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 4>It's great to have it's great for consumer to have

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 4>some subsidy, you know, help pay for the for the

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 4>cars that they're buying. But I think long term, you know,

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 4>it really needs the consumer to really buy into the product.

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Steve Man, Bloomberg Intelligence Global Autos and Industrials

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 2>analyst return next to some news in the aerospace industry

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>this week.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>American Airlines projected revenue growth for twenty twenty six, but

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>said that the winter storm that raged across the US

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.239
<v Speaker 3>this week will clip revenue this quarter.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>We also heard from jetbou Airways, who reported a wider

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>loss than expected last quarter, highlighting challenges a strategy to

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>win over higher paying customers.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 3>For all of this, as well as other news in

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the aerospace industry, we were joined by Sid Phillip. He

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>has Bloomberg's chief correspondent for Global Aviation. We began by

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>asking Sid for his take on American and Jet Blue's

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 3>recent results.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 5>So the airline industry is actually in a sort of

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 5>bit of a flux at the moment. I mean, you've

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 5>obviously had the impact of all these storms, you've had

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 5>the impact of the government shutdown, and you've got the

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 5>uncertainty about the year ahead. And so American Airlines is

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 5>taking a more bullish view of the year ahead. They're

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 5>sort of following their peers United and Delta in targeting

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 5>the most premium end of the spectrum, and they're sort

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 5>of hoping that by aiming their product at the premium

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 5>end of the market, they can sort of offset the

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 5>sort downturn that's happened in the bottom end of the market.

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Jet Blue also talking about how at the moment things

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 5>look a bit shaky, but they're talking about how they

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 5>see a road to profitability and a free cash flow

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 5>by the end of twenty twenty seven, and so slightly

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 5>more long term view of when the recovery might happen.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 5>And that sort of explains the dichotomy in the earnings

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 5>forecast for both these companies.

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 3>And of course Jeblue is also doing what it can

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>to premium premiumize if that's a verb, it's experience for

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 3>customers to with absolutely opening up that new lounge and JFK.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 3>So that is the story with airlines, and it's been

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>fairly consistent too with what we heard from Delta and United.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Where does that leave the smaller carriers that need to

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 3>either team up or fade into oblivion. I'm thinking Spirit,

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking Frontier. Is there still a market for these

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 3>discount carriers?

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 5>So the market at the moment is very tough for

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 5>the discount carriers. So essentially what's happening is that the

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 5>top end of the market is going to Delta and

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 5>United for their premium products like first class in business class,

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 5>and on the other end of the market you have

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 5>sort of everyone else competing to get the lowest cost

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 5>tickets into the hands of the passengers, and that sort

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 5>of eroding margins, especially as costs for both pilots and

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Cavin Krue are hurting the ultralo cost carriers and the

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 5>low cost carriers, and sort of that's sort of been

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 5>explained by this gay shaped recovery that airline executives are

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 5>talking about, and so Jet Blue and the others are

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 5>sort of trying to get the premium end of it.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we've seen even Spirit Airlines talking about how

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 5>they're adding a so called business class product. They've added

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 5>Wi Fi, They've added all sorts of things to keep

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 5>people coming back to them, and so they're hoping that

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 5>by slightly differentiating themselves from just very commoditized ultra low

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 5>cost carriers, they can be able to get in those customers.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, then it kind of goes back to the point,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>is there a need for her real true low cost

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>carrier out there? Are some of these supposed ones are

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>going kind of mid market higher market. Is there a

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>market demand for that or is everybody just willing to

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>pay up for travel?

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 5>At the moment, it looks the people who are willing

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 5>to pay up for travel are the people willing to

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 5>pay up for travel, and so at the bottom end

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 5>of the market. I mean, everyone talks about how there

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 5>will be a recovery of the ultralocost carrier years and

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 5>that once people are more certain about the economy, and

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 5>once people at the bottom end of that k start

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 5>to see some stability in the economy, people will travel

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 5>because I mean, remember during the pandemic, there was after

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 5>as we exited the pandemic, there was this boom in

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 5>travel for across the board and that sort of has

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 5>further split up, and so we will see that demand

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 5>coming back, we just don't know when and what sort

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 5>of shape that will be.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 3>So sid you also cover Boeing, and it came out

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>with its results and in terms of the numbers for

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter free cash flow topping estimates, it generated

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>cash for a second straight quarter. That sounds like it's

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>good news. How far along this recovery, this long awaited

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 3>covery is Boeing Actually.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 5>So Boeing is on the road to recovery. They're still

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 5>not they yet, but they are recover They are recovering.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean their fourth quarter results and their Follio results

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 5>were boosted by the sale of their Jefferson Digital Aviation

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 5>subsidiary and that sort of gave them a nine point

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 5>six pl in the dollar boost. And at the same time,

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 5>the Boeing is sort of ramping up production. They are

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 5>ramping up sales. I mean they've seen a surgeon sales.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 5>I mean in the last ever since the Trump administration

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 5>came in, we've seen a surgeon Boeing sales. And so

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Kelly Ottberg, the new CEO, is sort of pushing Boeing

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 5>to improve production, ramp up production at a steady base.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean they've gone to about forty two seven three

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 5>seven max jets a month, and they are sort of

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 5>further boosting those production numbers and that will get them

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 5>on at the sort of where they want to be

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 5>in the Kelly Outberg's talked about how ten billion in

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 5>free cash flow is his target and the company's on

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 5>its way there.

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Sid Phillip Bloomberg Intelligence senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Airlines analysts coming up a.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Look at why the wireless provider AT and T posted

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter profit and revenue do beat Wall Street estimates.

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Scarlet Foo and I'm Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>We moved to some news in that tech space this week.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 3>We heard that the CHIPDRII and Vidia invested an additional

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 3>two billion dollars in the a cloud computing startup core Weave.

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>As part of the collaboration, core Weef will be among

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the first to deploy forthcoming Nvidia products.

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>We brought in on our Granda Bloomberg Intelligence tech analysts

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 3>to tell us more.

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>We first asked an A Rock for his reaction to

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>this deal.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 6>If you go back in history and see when Cordeviev

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 6>was going public, it was having a hard time getting

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 6>a good pricing, and then Nvidia kicked in and said,

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're going to be a part of this

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 6>particular IPO. And I think what's happening here is this

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 6>and Vidia is creating the chips, and Codeviev is helping

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 6>them sell the computing using those chips. Two different public

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 6>that's out there now. At this time, Codeviev has a

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 6>massive backlog of ordos, but it needs to get funding

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 6>done in order to convert that into data centers and

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 6>then capacity. Now you know, in Vidia isn't giving them

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 6>money straight away, but it's basically saying, you know, we

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 6>have confidence in this in this company, and it would help.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 6>Then code We've go out and raise capital from outside.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 6>So I think it's a little bit more like spreading

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 6>the Nvidia ecosystem is what that's happening right now.

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Looking at your research note, note that Coreweve has fifty

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in remaining performance obligations. What does that mean?

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, basically it says this is kind of the contracted

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 6>revenue they have on hand, which means, you know, Microsoft

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 6>has said, you know what, I'm good for ten out

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 6>of that. For example, Meta has a deal with them,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 6>so they have this backlog of all these orders. But

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, unlike other companies, you just can't go out

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 6>and fulfill the demand. You have to create a very

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 6>large data centers using in Vidia chips. It then starts

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 6>to work out or runs, and then you realize that

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 6>fifty billion into revenue over the next several years.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>So what's the gating issue here for or Corewave? Is

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>it more access to more data centers? What's kind of

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the gating issue for them to fulfill that revenue?

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 6>Multiple gating factors. One is actually the data center itself.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 6>For that, you need land, you need power. You know,

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 6>the chip side is okay at this point because in

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 6>radio is there, but then also you need capital. I mean,

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 6>code Weave is not a company like Microsoft or Amazon

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 6>that has unlimited capital to create these data centers, it

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 6>has to go in the market and raise capital. Before

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 6>they went public, I mean their cost of capital was

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 6>north of ten percent. Right now after they went public,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean the cost of capital has gone down to

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 6>about eight percent. But the entire neo clouds are in,

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 6>whether it is code Weave or whether it is nebus,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 6>really depends on private credit lending or lending by other

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 6>banks to really come up with the funding to create

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 6>these data centers.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 2>So I also see that Microsoft unveil's latest AI chip

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>to reduce reliance on in video. What's going on there?

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 6>So this is something that's going on with all hyper

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 6>scale cloud providers, you know, whether that's Google with its CPUs,

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 6>Amazon with its chip, and now Microsoft launching I mean

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 6>they have one chip, but the first generation was not

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 6>you could say, did not do that well in terms

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 6>of you know, reception from customers. What Microsoft is hoping

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 6>here right now is, you know, for training, they'll still

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 6>use the more powerful and video chips, but for you know,

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 6>running let's say a co pilot, they could get around

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 6>and use less powerful chips and big and if they

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 6>do that, they actually save a lot of money. You know,

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 6>in our math, we think if if Microsoft is going

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 6>to spend you know, somewhere north of one hundred and

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 6>forty billion dollars this year, more than fifty of that

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 6>is going to go just buying chips, and so you know,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 6>it's it's a very big ticket for them, and they

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 6>everybody needs to be doing this, frankly in house.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Honor A. Grannap Bloomberg Intelligence Technology analyst.

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Move next to earnings from the coffee Chaine.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Starbucks, and this week the company reported global sales at

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 3>established locations whereas four percent in the most recent quarter

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 3>that top to analyst estimates.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 2>For more I was joined Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Restaurant and Food service analysts. At first they asked Michael

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>to break down how CEO Brian Nichols turnaround plan is

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>going at Starbucks.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 7>The turnaround plans are starting to really take a hold

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 7>right now, and results really improved, rising, you know, four

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 7>percent system wide same Star sales US as well. China

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 7>was up seven percent. You know here in the US,

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 7>it's you know, mainly about better operations, right They rolled

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 7>out new operating standards late last year and that They

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 7>seem to be really boosting the speed of service, which

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 7>is creating happier customers that come back more frequently.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 7>Some food innovation including protein cold foam seems to be

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 7>hitting the mark right. And they're doing a better job

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 7>on the marketing side. So all those are driving drove

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 7>better Same Star sales than expected.

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know the one. I go to the

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks thirty five Wall Township, New Jery. They do a

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 2>great job for me, and I've noticed the change. I mean,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, little things like you know, writing your name

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>back on the coup like they used to back in

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the early days. As in addition to that sticker which

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>was a little antiseptic. I guess talk to us about

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 2>costs there. Are they looking at their costs as well?

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, they they've identified two billion dollars in annual costs

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 7>that they want to get after over the next one

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 7>to two years. You know, Right now, margins have been impacted.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 7>They've gotten those same Star sales and traffic numbers up

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 7>by adding labor to the stores, right, and so they're

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 7>seeing margin compression still. So now that they got people

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 7>coming back to the stores, now that the operations are

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 7>more dialed in, you know, CEO Brian Nichol said, they're

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 7>not quite where they need to be throughout the day.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 7>They're great at peak, but they have some improvement still

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 7>to do. But you know, now that people are coming

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 7>back to the stores, they're gonna you know, focus a

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 7>little bit more on where where they can save some money,

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 7>because you know, it was a smart move, real reallocating

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 7>labor into the stores.

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>But Costley talk to about the competitive environment because you

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>go to like, I don't know, small towns, seems like

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 2>there's a coffee joint on every corner of these days.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 2>What's the competitive landscape for Starbucks these days.

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, it's as it's as competitive as it's

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 7>ever been. You know, you have some of these younger

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 7>chains that seem to do really well with gen Z,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 7>like Dutch Bros. And UH seven Brew, and they're they're

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 7>opening up these drive through cans, you know, throughout the

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 7>suburbs across America, you know, in the cities. You know,

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 7>there's a lot of competition with these you know, very

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 7>high end coffee shops that are you know, using very

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 7>you know, very high quality coffee and offering an elevated

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 7>food experience. So competition is tough, and that's why you

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 7>know Starbucks is is making some changes. You know, they're

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 7>focusing on on health and wellness, right They're looking to

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 7>improve the food in the bake case there, looking to

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 7>improve the food or throughout the day they're looking into

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 7>some new innovative drink off rings to boost that afternoon

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 7>day part. And so you know, this is just the

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 7>beginning of what Starbucks, you know, things they need to

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 7>do for long term continued same Star sales growth.

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Restaurant and

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Food Service analyst, we.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Moved next to the telecommunication space.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 3>This week. AT and T reported fourth quarter profit and

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 3>revenue that beat analyst estimates.

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 2>The results were fueled by customers who subscribed to more

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 2>than one connectivity service. AT and T added more than

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 2>a half a million fixed and mobile internet subscribers in

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the quarter.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 3>So we brought in John Butler, our senior telecom analyst,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 3>and began by asking John where AT and T stands

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>relative to its rivals.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Host the earnings call, they held a breakout session with

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 8>the master relations with the cell side, and there were

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 8>a lot of questions about how broadband, or how competition

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 8>is now shifting from wireless over to broadband. I actually

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 8>think AT and T is in a great position relative

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 8>to their competitors because they're the fiber leader, and they're

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 8>about to buy Luhmann's fiber business and add another million

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 8>fiber subscribers there. So in terms of their ability to

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 8>sell what are called converged packages or wireless together with broadband,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 8>they're in a great position there because they have both

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 8>fiber and they have a smaller fixed wireless access business,

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 8>which is that wireless broadband product.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 2>John, this is a cup of AT and T that

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 2>spends twenty twenty two billion dollars in capex every year.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>What does that capex for?

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 8>Typically a lot of it, Paul is going towards wireless

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 8>network up grades as well as the deployment of fibers.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 8>So this year, for example, they're going to add five

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 8>million new fiber homes, but it costs about two thousand dollars,

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 8>maybe twice that in some markets to build a new

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 8>what's called a fiber homes pass. So a lot a

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 8>lot of capital is getting spent this year, next year,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 8>and maybe to a little bit of a lesser degree

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 8>in twenty eight. That's sort of laying the foundation to

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 8>build out that fiber network and that five G wireless network.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 8>Beyond that, AT and T has said we're going to

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 8>cut our cap backs, We're going to lower our capital intensity,

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 8>and you're going to see a lot more free cash

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 8>flow flow through and they're going to be able to

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 8>fund hopefully some dividend growth after that and increase the

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 8>share buyback.

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I'm looking at the dividend yield for AT and

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>T four point six percent. For Verizon, it's almost seven percent.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 3>For Team Mobile a little bit less at two point

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 3>nineteen percent, John, Where did the telecom stand when it

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 3>comes to this rotation out of big tech looking for

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 3>some cyclicals, looking for parts of the market that haven't

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 3>been overbought.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 8>So it's a good question, Scorelett. I always say telecoms,

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 8>particularly the dividend payers like AT and TM, rise in

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 8>our bond proxies to a degree. I think sentiment has

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 8>been pushed around a little bit by the fact that

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 8>we have new CEOs at both Verizon and T Mobile,

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 8>and these guys are going to be looking to make

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 8>their mark. So there's been a little bit of concern

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 8>or more than a little bit of concern that the

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 8>competitive intensity and wireless is going to pick up as

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 8>these new CEOs look to make their mark, and I

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 8>think that has led to some of the pressure, particularly

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 8>on AT and T, though again I think they put

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 8>a lot of those concerns to rest with their by

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 8>reiterating their fiber plans and laying out new free cash

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 8>flow guidance.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>John on the competitive land front, where are the cable

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>companies these days?

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 8>They're struggling, Paul. I mean they're at a technology disadvantage

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 8>in that they they're offering broadband over those legacy coaxial

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 8>cable networks. They're doing what they can to upgrade the

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 8>technology and increase speeds on those networks, but at the

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 8>end of the day, fiber really is a superior product

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 8>to everything else on the market, and fixed wireless access,

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 8>which has been offered by the telcos has been a

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 8>very popular choice given the fact that it's an easy setup.

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 8>It's over the air, so there's very little problems with it.

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 8>It's pretty much problem free. As broadband goes over time,

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 8>it sort of has a headroom problem. It can't offer

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 8>the same speeds as fiber. But through it all, cable

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 8>is sort of flying underneath those two products, sort of

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, trying to compete with what is a legacy

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 8>product in the market.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 3>John, did we learn anything from AT and t's results

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 3>regarding iPhones and you know, consumers signing on for the

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 3>latest version of the iPhone?

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 8>So great question. It's very interesting AT and T over

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 8>indexes to the iPhone. They have a lot more users

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 8>than Verizon or Team because they had an early exclusivity

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 8>deal when the iPhone first launched. They were asked about

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 8>the foldable iPhone that's rumored to be coming out next

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 8>year and whether that's really going to move the dial

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 8>for them. Their answer to me was interesting, I didn't

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 8>expect it, which is they've been tracking the performance and

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 8>the sales of the foldables that they have available on

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 8>the network on the Android side, and their expectation is

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 8>that we won't see a huge bump in iPhone sales

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 8>next year. I think time will tell. I actually think

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 8>foldables are going to resonate well with people, and Android

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 8>isn't always the best read through there. I think it's

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 8>a different kind of user that's on the Android phone

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 8>versus iPhone. But we'll have to see in the fall.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence senior telecom analyst.

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Coming up a look at why the logistics company UPS

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 3>says it expects to cut another thirty thousand jobs this year.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intel Elegence on Bloomberg Radio pro

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 2>riding in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence through Bigo on the terminal.

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlett Foe and.

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 2>We move next to news from the logistics company UPS.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>This week, UPS forecast full year sales that beat analyst estimates.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 2>However, the company also said it expects to cut another

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty thousand jobs this year to raining cost and boost profitability.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 3>For more on this and the state of the shipping industry,

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 3>we brought in Thomas Black. He's a Bloomberg opinion columnist.

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Thomas to give us his take on

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 2>what we heard from UPS.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 9>UPS continues to shrink to become more profitable. That's the

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 9>big takeaway there. They're reducing their Amazon business, and they're

0:26:55.680 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 9>trying to retrench with more profitable packages, and that's probably

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 9>a move away from some of the e commerce deliveries

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 9>where the competition is fierce and there's lots of little

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 9>companies that are out there competing.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 3>So how far along this journey of shrinking to become

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 3>more profitable are they? Are we in the third inning?

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Are we in the seventh inning?

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 9>This will be the last year of this, so I

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 9>would say we're in the sixth inning heading toward the ninth.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 9>So after this year, Carol to May, the CEO at UPS,

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 9>said we're going to be a leaner company and ready

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 9>to grow. So it's going to be a little bit

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 9>painful this year, she walked analysts through it. The first

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 9>half is going to be more painful as they glide

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 9>down from Amazon and they take some write downs and

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 9>so forth. As you know, they retired their fleet of

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 9>MD eleven's, which is this old plane that was assently

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 9>had the crash. So they're going through all of this

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 9>in the first half, and then the second half things

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 9>should start to turn around. They're also they're not only

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 9>shrinking their Amazon business, are shrinking their footprint, their facilities

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 9>and the older ones are being retired and they're replacing

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 9>those with new automated facilities, and that's going to allow

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 9>them to lay off more union workers. So that big

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 9>union contract where the teamsters push through a big labor

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 9>increase is turning around to bite them a little bit

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 9>because UPS is dealing with that by shrinking its workforce.

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 2>How does this UPS strategy differ from that of fed X.

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 9>They're similar in the sense that they're both cutting costs aggressively.

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 9>Of fed X is a little bit different because it

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 9>doesn't have the labor costs from the union workforce, so

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 9>it's a little bit more flexible. And fed X is

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 9>undergoing a major overhaul that's probably in its last innings

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 9>as well. And the last part of that is the

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 9>most difficult part, where they're going to combine their two

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 9>separate networks, the ground network and express network. They're in

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 9>the middle of that, but so they're going to be

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 9>coming out of that as well. So we're going to

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 9>have two parcel companies that are restructured and ready to

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 9>grow at the end of this year.

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Every time there's some kind of headline regarding UPS laying

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 3>off workers or cutting positions, it's in. It's these massive

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 3>numbers right this time around. It's up to thirty thousand

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 3>positions this year. And as you mentioned, Thomas, this is

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>all due to trimming down and small downsizing the scope

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of the company. At what point are we looking at

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 3>job cuts tied to AI or have we not got

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 3>even gotten there yet?

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, I would instead of saying AI, I would say

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 9>automation and that those are these new facilities that handle

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 9>packages automatically. You even have the induction of packages where

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 9>you have robots putting the packages on the conveyor belts

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 9>and taking them off. So those are the steps toward

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 9>more automation. This is that physical AI that people talk about.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 9>An interesting stat that Carol to May gave on the

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 9>cause that those automated buildings are twenty eight percent more

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 9>efficient than the older buildings. So the more automation is

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 9>where they're leaning into. So it's part of it shrinking

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 9>some of the low profit volume plus more automation to

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 9>replace the human workers.

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Basically, e commerce continues to grow, and I guess Double Digits,

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>who's handling all these packages of ups, is maybe backing

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 2>away a little bit.

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, Amazon has its own delivery network. It tends to

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 9>want to deliver into those big urban areas where it

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 9>just takes things from a warehouse to a residential home.

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 9>So they do that very well. Where they want help

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 9>is on the rural areas. That's where they turn to

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 9>folks like UPS and the postal service. So obviously Amazon

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 9>is a big player there. We'll also have lots of

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 9>smaller companies. These are big type companies that have apps

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 9>and workers show up and they have an app on

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 9>their phone and it gives them a delivery route and

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 9>they throw packages in their car or their truck and

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 9>they go delivers. There's a lot of those companies that

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 9>tend to operate in urban areas, so there's actually a

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 9>lot of capacity out there for retailers or people who

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 9>are really smart on their inventory management to tap into.

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 3>That was Thomas Black, Bloomberg opinion columnist.

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 2>We move now to a Bloomberg Big Takes story we

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 2>recently focused on entitled Yale's endowment model falters at tough

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>moment for universities. You can find it on Bloomberg dot

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 2>com and the Terminal.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 3>So the story looks at how Yale bet on private

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 3>equity and other I liquid investments, and now some of

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 3>the wealthiest endowments, including Yale and others that follow the

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Yale model, are on the hook for hundreds of millions

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 3>of dollars in new endowment taxes from the White House.

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Now universities are dumping private equity funds at discounts following

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>years of poor returns, while public stocks have outperformed the

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>asset class.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 3>For more, we brought in Janet Lauren Bloomberg's Higher Education

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 3>finance reporter.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 2>You first asked Janet to break down what is happening

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 2>with Yale's and down model.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 10>From time to time, We've seen that in certain years

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 10>where simple just outperformed private equity and other VC And

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty one, remember the outstanding returns that these

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 10>schools had, but now higher interest rates, fewer exits. You've

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 10>got a huge amount of money locked up in private equity,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 10>in some cases forty percent. And you know, look, these

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 10>schools would like a little cash. They're looking, you know,

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 10>perhaps they want to change managers. They need the cash

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 10>to do other things as well and refresh their portfolios.

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 10>But when you have, you know, in the forty percent

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 10>locked up, you know, time to think about other things.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 10>And that's perhaps why you saw Yale doing its first

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 10>ever sale last year, which was a big deal.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 2>So again this sale, Yale unloaded about two point five

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in LBO funds at a discount that is brutal. Well,

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>is it unprecedented.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 10>Or other we Well, Yale has done it for the

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 10>first time. You know, others had been doing this before.

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 10>Harvard has unloaded a lot in previous years. But it's

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 10>sort of a new normal in some ways looking at secondaries.

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 10>The secondary market is very popular right now, and you know,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 10>they in the hunt for potential cash and liquidity. You know,

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 10>you look at the UC Endowment where we talked about

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 10>this eighty twenty they call it the Blue and Gold Fund,

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 10>very proud of it, and in the height of the

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 10>pandemic when they wanted some liquidity, they gave almost two

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars in cash to the campuses for liquidity. Compare

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 10>that to two thousand and eight when schools were forced

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 10>to sell on the secondaries or borrow. That's kind of

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 10>a stark example right there.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 3>When you need money, when you need money, and I

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 3>think that's a key phrase here, especially in twenty twenty six,

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 3>because this White House has been targeting higher ed and

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 3>even though Yale has not been targeted to the extent

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 3>that Harvard has, for instance, or Columbia, these schools need

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 3>money in a way that they didn't before, for nothing

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 3>else to pay taxes on their endowment.

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 10>Yes, and that's a huge game changer. You know, a

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 10>year ago we may not be having this conversation. Yale

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 10>and Harvard each had pegged their bill for the endowment tax,

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 10>which is now eight percent of net investment returns, to

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 10>be about three hundred million dollars a year.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Wow. And is that enforced? Is that happening right now?

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely? That happened in July first, when the big beautiful ACCT.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>How about the the actual I guess halting payments to

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 2>some of these universities that President Trump administration I've talked

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>ab for some of their funding. Has that happened?

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 10>So many schools have had settlements. Harvard famously has not yet.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 10>There was a lawsuit in last September. The district court

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 10>ruled in favor of Harvard. Late December the government appealed.

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.720
<v Speaker 10>So that's still in flux. But there's a huge concern

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 10>of Harvard in all universities. Are we still going to

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 10>get this federal research funding going forward, and Harvard may

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 10>have temporarily solved their problem, still very unclear, but what

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 10>is the money going forward? School our universities, these large

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 10>research universities still going to be able to count on

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 10>hundreds of millions of dollars. You know, Northwestern, which settled

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 10>around Thanksgiving, had been self funding their research the tune

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 10>of something like thirty or forty million dollars a month.

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 10>So we're talking, you know, lots and lots of money.

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they need the money in a way that they

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't before. And going back to the Yell endowment strategy

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 3>and how well it worked at least initially when David

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Swinson launched it back I think in the eighties and

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 3>nineties those were the heydays of the Yell endowment model.

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it made sense when private equity, private investing was

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 3>not a big thing yet, was not yet mainstream, or

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe it makes more sense on a low rate environment.

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 3>But times have changed, and that's a big part of it.

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 10>Right absolutely, first mover advantage. You know, there weren't as

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 10>many institutional investors doing what he was doing. He was

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 10>he saw inefficiencies in the market and he said look,

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 10>this is what we can do. We have the ability

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 10>to lock up money for a while. We're very long

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 10>term investors. We invest in scent in for centuries. We

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 10>can do this and they and it was extremely successful,

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 10>and others tried to copy. Certainly more money piled into

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 10>private equity, sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, foundations, and when

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 10>you have a lot of money chasing returns, it just

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 10>it just isn't a successful especially at this higher interest

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 10>rate when there are fewer exits.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 2>What is the l model in terms of asset allocation?

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 2>And is it dead now?

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, we had the head of a very

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 10>large pension fund say it's not dead. It's perhaps on

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 10>life support, but it's you know, it's it's looking at

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 10>inefficiencies in the market. Now. Typically Yale has not been

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 10>a big investor in US equities, you know, timey share

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 10>of you know, we don't know the details because unfortunately

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 10>they stopped publishing their asset elogition when David Swentz had died.

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 10>You know, a huge loss for me personally because it

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 10>gave me some great insight. But they, you know, typically

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 10>had a very very tiny investment in US equities Now

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 10>look at the University of California, you know, eighty percent

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 10>in global equities. But you know who is who are

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 10>they trying to emulate? You know, some investor in Omaha

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 10>who's been pretty successful, Yeah, you know, betting on America.

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but just buying cheap index funds. I guess what's

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 3>not immediately obvious to people is that an endowment is

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 3>more of a fund of funds rather than just a

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 3>fund like the UC fund, the Blow and Gold fund

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you were talking about. That's almost like a very basic

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 3>personal account where you're just putting money into index funds

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and not dealing with it for a long time exactly.

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 3>But Yale is like they're picking fund managers like it's

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 3>very very complex.

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's actively managed. And Yale is very famous for,

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 10>you know, having managers for ten or more years. They

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 10>did a story maybe ten years ago that talked about

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 10>the length of managers and it's often ten years. And

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, Yale very smartly came up with a new

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 10>program they called the Prospect Fellowship, and they're looking for

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 10>new talent. And we had a comment from a former

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 10>Princeton manager who talked about, you know, they look for

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 10>talent and they grow with them. So maybe a small

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 10>allocation to a manager today think Hill House at Yale.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 10>It turns when they're successful into you know, billion dollar investments,

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 10>and especially when they've done well. You know, you can

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 10>grow with a successful manager and then all of a sudden,

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 10>your allocations are much larger as you're growing with them,

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 10>and that's what they're seeking, So that's sort of like

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:44.919
<v Speaker 10>a refresh for them.

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 3>That was Janet Lauren, Bloomberg's Higher Education finance reporter.

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 2>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 3>And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence b I go

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 3>on the terminal. I'm Scarlett and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. Today's top stories and global business headlines

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 2>are coming up right now.

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 4>M