WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off September 8th, 2022 (Ep. 591)

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's leading off. What's up everybody. It's Chris Wells.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Should joining me on this beautiful Thursday is Andrew Seifter

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and we are in the house to get you set

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for all your playoffs, all your stuff, all your things.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Talk about rookies who we were gonna maybe cut, who

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>hit home runs, and you know that guy, Aaron Judge.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Andrew Andrew fifty five homers for Aaron Judge,

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>no big deal. Also getting a little Barry Bond's treatment.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Five walks in the doubleheader yesterday. Aaron Judge is quite

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the MVP.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's you know, we've had this discussion about Otani

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 2>versus Judge, and Otani has the edge because of the pitching,

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>but Judge is making it really hard to dispute what

0:00:58.960 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>he's doing.

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>It's it's really impressive.

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think I saw Gray from Rasball

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter doing that comparison to Barry Bonds and talking

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>about how you remembers playing fantasy when Barry Bonds set

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 2>that home run record, and it really is starting to

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 2>feel like that with all these walks and twenty more

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 2>home runs than anybody else in the league.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 3>It's really special.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>It is in that range and pitchers and teams are

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to approach him like that. I don't think any

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>team is going to want to be the team that

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to give up, you know, the call the homer,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the big one that's going to break any records. So

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how that goes the rest of the way.

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>And funny enough, we had the Wonky bonus yesterday. Dang

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the don't remember this the Otani versus

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Judge of trying not to. I'm trying to avoid going

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>into it. Just can't help it. Sometimes it's always so

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>tough too with these things where it's like every day

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the big pieces of news, it's like it's

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>O Tawny or Judge doing something and they both hit

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>homers yesterday and Judge just keeps going. So I apologize,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, but we don't need to go through the

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>MVP conversations or anything like that. But it was funny

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>because yesterday Wonky had the bonus for the home run call,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>which the bonus was taking a player who had a

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>double digit number like eleven, twenty two, thirty three, and

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you would get to rock with that, except Judge wasn't

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>available because Judge was in a double header. That's part

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the home run contest rules, which I found out

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple months ago, and there was a controversy. Bradley

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was calling us out on it. Joe got back into

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it all in fun, and Judge of course, was the

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>only double digit number guy to hit that home run

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and it did not count for anybody but number fifty five.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Now five away, we are in the five homer territory

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of greatness across the board. Five more for sixty and

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>five more for seven hundred for pool holes. So it's

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>actually it's a pretty kind of fun time right now,

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with the twenty ish days left of baseball to get going. Andrew,

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get your take on this. Yesterday, Kelly and

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>I were talking about Corbyn, Carroll talk about rookies in general.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>Connor Henderson has been really you know, you and I

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think had this conversation a week or so ago where

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like the end of the day when these top

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>prospects are going to come up and they're going to

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>get regular time. Most likely the person you're going to

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ask us, like, hey, should I cut this guy, it's

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be a yes. You know, we were

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>cutting with Merrifield. We were cutting them into Rosario. We're

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>cutting some of these players to bring in these guys.

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Gunner's played well and Corbin had not really been playing fantastic.

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>First couple of games are good, kind of cool down

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit sitting versus lefties occasionally. Well, yesterday, this

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>does what he does, picks it back up, hits his

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>first Carol barrel as I like to call it, got

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>his first home run, was two for four, got his

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>average backup. He's now into the two eighties. I'm going

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to get your take on how volatile you are willing

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to be with a lot of these rookies right now

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>if they're struggling, How quick on the burnon churn are

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you going to be and how tightly do you want

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to hold on to guys like Gunner and Corbyn Carrol

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sure they get it right with these last

0:03:58.160 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really tough because you know, in a redraft league,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>as we get closer to the end of the season,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>you just you're you're more excited about these players than

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it really warrants, to be honest, because they are, like

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you said, volatile. They could be great or they could struggle.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>So it depends what sort of position you're in. If

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 2>you're in a rotissary league and you've got a lead

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and you're just trying, you know, if you just take

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>care of business, you're gonna win. You should go for

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 2>more stable players in that situation. I would argue if

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 2>you're in a if you need to you know, cat's

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 2>lightning in a bottle like we talk about, and make

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 2>make up ground on people in these final weeks, or

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you have a head to head playoff matchup and you

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>look at the other team and you say that team

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 2>looks better than my team. I need something special. I

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>need Corbyn Carroll. In that situation, I would absolutely roll

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the dice on it. So it really does matter your

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 2>individual situation.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we tend as fantasy analysts to get super

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>excited about these young prospects, but if you're not in

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 2>a keeper of dynasty league, you're really just making a

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 2>bet on who's going to be best in these next

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>three Yeah.

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean the positive is that Carol's moved up in

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the order a little bit. I think he's hitting five dinbacks,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>has been hitting really well, so that's something to keep

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>positive about with all of the rookies coming up. One

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting things that's going on. Bog and I

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on the in This League Fantasy Baseball podcast, we're looking

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>at hot bats for the last two weeks. Pickups. You

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>could do some of the top pickups. You have some

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>guys that you know are stealing some basses, you know,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Taylor, Josey Sirius stealing bases versus let's take out

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Gunner and Corman for a second. Take those guys off

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the table versus a lot of hitting prospects. Because those

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>two are specifically five tool there's not a lot of

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>those guys, and those are the biggest names, But there

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>are some big name prospects that are sitting around that

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.799
<v Speaker 1>aren't like that. You've got Trista Consis, You've got Michael Tolia,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>who hit another homer yesterday and getting the call tomorrow.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Is Josh Young jay U n G looks like Jung.

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It's young Josh Young with the Rangers is getting the

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>call up. And this is another one of these guys

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. Funny enough, I told you guys, what was

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it like five weeks ago when he was rehabbing right

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>across the street and I was at his first game

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>he had had in like a year, and now you

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>know he's one hundred and twenty four at bats through

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues at least, you know, rookie ball and

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>triple A hit nine homers, had one stolen base two

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty six. But here's my point, as you've got these

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 1>guys with great hit tools, Young would be my prioritization

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>over both causes and Tolia. Tolia might be number two

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>right now over Casses because of the power, but these

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>are not stolen base options. So you have high hit

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>tool prospects getting every day playing time versus kind of

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>boring Jose Siri, Michael Taylor's, who are doing a little

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of everything with stolen bases. How would you prioritize

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the boring no name, they're hot going right now series

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Taylor's versus no stolen bases but hot hit

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>prospects out of Josh Young, Cassis and Michael Tolia.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, it really depends again on format. You know,

0:06:58.440 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>first of all, you need to be in that road

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>league where you need those steals. If you need the steals,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>you got to follow the steels. You know, I would

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>argue though that there's another prospect you didn't even mention

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>that I would prefer over at least a couple of

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>those guys, and that's Alec Burrelson, who just got the

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 2>call with the Cardinals, because that guy's actually been mashing

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>in the minors, unlike Josh Young, who I love long term,

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 2>but let's be real, his minor.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>League numbers don't look that special.

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>So I think we're at a part of the season

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 2>now where I'm less concerned about who's the higher prospect

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know, going to be the best in five

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 2>years from now.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to know who's going to be the best

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>next week.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And you know, there's also an argument for stepping into

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals lineup. That's a fantastic lineup. I think we've

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>seen this with the Braves as well. When when these

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>prospects get this opportunity in this loaded lineup, they have

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>better lineup protection, They're going to have more ability to

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>drive in runs. So I think that that makes a

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>real difference in fantasy. So, you know, I like guy

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 2>like TOTALLYA sure, I'll play them at cores if you know,

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>if you see the schedule and he's got some games

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 2>combat at cores. But He's still got a ton of

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 2>swing and miss to his game, so he could really struggle.

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, and strike out four times in a

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 2>game any at any given time.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>So I like Burlson right now.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So you go, would you go? Because it's just about

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same level here, would you go Burlson over

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh Young? As far as what you're going to prioritize.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if it's not a keeper league, I'll take Burlson.

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, yeah, I mean Burlson has had a fantastic

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>minor league season this year. Twenty homers, three point thirty one.

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>He's hit one hundred and forty three hits on the year,

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>three seventy two LOVP, and he moved three levels last year,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>which was really impressive. He spent the entire year at

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>TRIPAA this year. Last year was a pretty successful season.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't steal a whole lot, but also doesn't strike out

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch. You gotta imagine he's probably going to

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>be hitting seven or eight for this team, and hopefully

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be you know enough, but you know,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they got a lot of injuries on that front. He's

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get some work. It's not a bad gig.

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I still dig Josh Young. That's going to probably might

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>be where I go with it. But Burlson is a

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>nice sneaky pickup, and you know, sneaky pickups is kind

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the game plan. It's the play of the day here.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Jake McCarthy has been that large noop barge. It happens

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>to be in the chat right here with these days.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>These guys have been sneaky pickups this year. And the

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest strategy really everybody can be given is just have

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a short memory. You know, if you have

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to cut a guy, just kind of forget about him

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and move on, you know, don't think about it because

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there's only so much time here. And Bagman brought this

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>great point we were talking about this is a big one.

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Louise Robert and how Robert has struggled.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>He has struggled. I think he's like hitting under two

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred in the last two weeks, in the last month,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been great. And someone in a little bit

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of a smaller league was dealing with a situation of

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like should we drop Robert? And they listed off some

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>players that are out there with guys like Brian Reynolds

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and kind of renfro and Jake McCarthy, and we said,

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, here's an experiment for you.

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Think of what Robert's line is going to be the

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season, and think of what it's going

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>to look like from those stream mean bats. If you

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>could start streaming them, get Renfro in for three days,

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>get McCarthy in, you're probably going to beat it exponentially

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>what Robert does the rest of this year with those

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>type of streaming options. So you know, it's a case

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>by case situation of what's available out there, but streaming

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at this point is probably going and obviously your pickups

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to be something to think about, but it's

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>probably going to outperform these names that are just sitting

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>out there hitting two twenty.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 3>And I'm yeah, no, absolutely, I mean.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, and it's like you know, as analysts, when we

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>put together our rankings, that's something I think is really

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 2>important to do is try to actually put real projections

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>out there in your mind, like what put numbers to

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>your biases, you know, and see how it works out,

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 2>because oftentimes, like you said, you'll find out that your

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 2>bias was way off and even though one guy might

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>be the more exciting dynamic player, the other guy actually

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>will help you win your league more in these next

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 2>few weeks.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly a few other headlines here. Kyle Finnegan gave

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>up five earned runs in the b botom of the

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>ninth to allow Saint Louis a six to five victory

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in plosion is what we would call.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>That, Andrew, Yeah, you usually asked me when I come on,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 2>how I'm doing, and I was all prepared to start

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 2>with that because that really ruined my day. I'm trying

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 2>to close out a fantasy title here, and I have

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Finnegan in my lineup.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a serious killer.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>The only saving grace is it's a roto league and

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>not a head to head playoff matchup where I would

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty much sink me instantaneously, so I could still try

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 2>to hold on.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 3>But that was sure not something I was looking to see.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I was about to tell you it might be closed

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>out either way for you, just the result might not

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>be exactly what you want. And this is a very

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>big surprise one because I was just talking about this yesterday,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like I said on ITL and this is not the

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>news that we saw and This came down today because

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I was at the point of saying, you probably could

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>move on, but wander Franco is going to meet the

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Rais in New York and could be activated as early

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>as Friday. Whoa, because wander Franco has had his rehabstint

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>stopped twice with soreness and injury in that wrist, and

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the race just said screw it. And this is I wish,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, more teams would do screw it at

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>this point in the year and having to throw a

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>guy into a rehab stint, have him do that at

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the major leagues like plenty of these guys. Now, obviously

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he does a younger guy and he's had some struggles

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, so I get it. But these extended minor

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>league times, especially for veterans and stuff, is always silly

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to me. And they just said, screw it, we're gonna

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>get him at the majors. They're going to activate him

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>as of Friday. That is not what I expected, and

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be able to get some wander production whatever

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be. Unfortunately, what I do hate to

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>say is I might throw wander back into that same

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Louise Robert conversation of saying, you know, obviously, if you're

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in a deeper league, this doesn't matter, like me, But

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're in like a ten or twelve and you've

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>got like a right full, you know, set of free

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>agents out there that I'm not sure you won't be

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>able to do better streaming at this point instead of

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just locking into one because we really just don't know,

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you known hand and risk and all those type of injuries,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of sapping power that kind of went

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>away for Wander. It was really that beginning of the month.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know you haven't been very big on Franco,

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so you're probably not jumping up and down for joy

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to be activated.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>No, I hate it that I'm becoming like the Wander

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Franco hater, but yes, I guess I'll just own it.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to category leagues, you know, he just

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>hasn't shown, you know, what power is there really to sap.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he has five home runs in fifty eight

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 2>games this season. Never really put up massive home run

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 2>numbers in the minors either. So he's a great long

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>term prospect, but at least with Luis Robert, like he

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>gives you the category juice. It's just a question of

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>can he actually be on the field. I mean, he's

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 2>just always missing time. But with Franco, even when he's

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 2>been on the field, even before the injury, when he

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 2>was healthy, his production was not as advertised.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think when you say, like where what

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>power is, it's about the potential with him, it's there,

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>it's just not tapped into and it's going to get there.

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>With Franco. That's why I have such a still long

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>term like aggressiveness on him, and the hit tool is

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>solely But you know, I had a problem with him

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in draft season where I remember I remember giving a

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>piece of p a crap for it. We were doing

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a draft. I think he did it with us very

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>very early on, and he had taken Wander like in

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the second round, and I was like, dude, I just

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>can't do it because there's so many guys out here,

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>there's so many short steps out here with better counting

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>stat potential production that I'm not going to eat all

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>these rounds of value just for batting average. And that's

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of where Franco unfortunately is sitting. But either way

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be activated for you guys that want

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to end up making those moves. Here's some injuries.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>One.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Soto was removed from Wednesday's game after getting hit by

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a pitch on his back. He says, so definitely be

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>ready for Friday's game to open up the weekend series

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Dodgers. So a little bad, but a little

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>good that he'll be back, you know, protect our Wan Sodos.

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Except you know, he hasn't really been hitting that well.

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think his biggest injury right now be a

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 2>bruised ego actually, because he's been getting booed by his

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>home fans there in San Diego.

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>And San Diego is not a place that is known

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>for us.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>We created all this stuff. Chill, chill, chill. We need

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>him to re sign.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's not a it's not a place that's

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>known for it's uh, you know, vitriol I would say

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty laid back place from from my experience.

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>But he's certainly struggled since he got there. And you know,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Jan Soto is a really great guy, but this is

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of pressure for him to walk into right

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>into a playoff chase, and with with those contractual issues

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and the amount of of prospects that they gave up

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to get him, So it's a lot of pressure, and

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 2>he was having kind of a disappointing season even even

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>before he went to the Padres. He's now barely a

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 2>top one hundred overall player in five by five leagues,

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>which is really I mean, he's barely more of He's

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 2>barely the most valuable Sodo in fantasy.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh boo Gregory Soto's shot. I don't like that.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is actually kind of my take that Wonky had

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're taking out their anger on Tatisa.

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think there's just a lot of like

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>frustration because it's a it's like a super ish team

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Padres keep building and mortgaging future and they

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can't get over the hump and they can't win games,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and the frustration kind of pours over a little bit.

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It'll be interesting to see how Sodo progresses. Tyler O'Neil

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting out Thursday with next stiffness. I thought I saw

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Maybe I was incorrect, but I thought I

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>saw he went on the il and that was what

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>pushed Alec Burlson. But maybe not.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's why Dylan Carlson is on the IL. That's

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 3>what it was.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Carlson was put on the I L and Tyler and'

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>neil sitting, which has got Alec Burlson in and an

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>MRI confirmed an ankle sprain for Wilson Contreras no structural

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>damage here, and a note is fantasy managers should consider

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>moving on from him as he might not play the

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way. This is a note from Wonky, which, yeah,

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I agree if you've got a

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>sprained ankle near the cubs, I'm not really sure what

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that's going to look like the rest of the year.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>There's probably going to be better options that are going

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to be sitting out on the wire, and I would

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>as well. I would probably move on from Contras if

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>you need to. I always want to give that as

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a preface, because I think everybody throws around all these

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>statements like, oh, you can cut him, you can get

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>rid of him, and it's like, well, if you need to,

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>if you've got an IL, drop the guy in an ale,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have to have any of these worries.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you are in an IL crunch. I do

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of leagues where miles are full and

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got to start making decisions. And if that's the case,

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this is probably somebody you can move on from due

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to that injury and the lack of production. You're going

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to get rest of you or do you agree with that?

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I do?

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I think you know, an added wrinkle here is that

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>he's an impending free agent, So I feel like the

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Cubs they don't have any reason to rush him back.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>They probably need to start figuring out the position long term.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think this is a reasonable moment

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 2>for them to basically say, Okay, thank you for your service.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 2>It's time for us to go in a new direction.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Now. Yeah, look at the chat too. They're just they're

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>ready to jump on the Padres to Drury fell off

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a wall. Chris said, wasn't he supposed to be the

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>next mantle for Soda? Oh? They're turning they're alternate. That's

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, this is really funny. Bagman brought this

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>up to me of like, he's like, have you ever

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>seen like Padres Twitter? And I do, But I see

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the positive side of Padres Twitter since I cover a

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of their minor leagues out here locally, and you know,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I get video of these guys. I'm around a lot

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, so I get all the positivity of

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the people that are like the future, and hey, all

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>these prospects, and they get very excited that I'm sharing stuff.

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, well I live I live in the Washington,

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 2>DC area, so I have a little different perspective on it.

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, he was so beloved in this area, and

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, DC is on the East Coast, but the

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 2>fan base is not like the Northeast.

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I grew up in Boston. You know, the

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 3>fan base in d C is very different.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>They really love their players and they maybe don't expect

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 2>that much of them, honestly. But I think the real

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>disappointment here was, of course that when they traded trade Turner,

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the whole reason was so they could keep Jan Soto

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and then that didn't turn out happening either.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>But you know, it's it's always tough with these things.

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 2>These guys that are loved with the team that they

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 2>come up with, they go to a new situation and

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 2>they don't have that history with that fan base, so

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it's huge expectations, a lot of pressure, and it can

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 2>go sour really quickly.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Very very true. No time all right, little palette cleanser.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Here a couple things This day in baseball nineteen seventy two,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Fergie Jenkins of the Chicago Cubs beat Philadelphia Phillies four

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to three for his twentieth victory of the season. It

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was his It was the sixth straight year the Jenkins

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>won at least twenty games. Can you imagine?

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I can't.

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I can only think of a handful of guys that

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>have won twenty games in the last like ten or

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. And unfortunately, the first one that comes to

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>my dumb brain is Ian Kennedy because with the diamondback,

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so think of six straight seasons. Fergie Jenkins was quite

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing.

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious how many starts he made that season, because

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that was the tail end of the

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 2>era where pitchers would just throw three times.

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 3>A week or something like that. I'm not sure he

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 3>actually was doing that though.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's psibility. Here's another modern day era question for you,

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and you can partake in this one. This one I

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>just thought was fascinating. I was really interested in it.

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And the question is who holds no cheating Anybody who

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>holds the modern era record for most consecutive strikeouts to

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>begin a game. And this is a two parter. I'll

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>give you credit for what's the number, and then the player,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's like if you if someone says

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the guy in the number, I'm gonna immediately think you cheated.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no way. But again, the question is who holds

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the modern era, modern era record for most consecutive strikeouts

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to begin a game? So bang, bang boom, they keep going.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I will accept either the number and the name. I'll

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>give you credit if you get the number. Any guesses

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to who this person is. The one other hint I

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>will give you it is like, uh, you know, it's

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's going now.

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>No, it is okay, because I was going now maybe

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 2>it was that Fergie Jenkins trivia, but I was I

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 2>had my mind back in the sixties with like Bob

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Gibson or Sandy Kofags or something.

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>No, it's a guy that's pitching, you know this season,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So modern day consecutive strikeouts to begin a game?

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 3>How about Verlander?

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a great guess. That is not but that's a

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>great guess.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Nine nine strikeouts.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That is the number.

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, Hey, I got I got half credit.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm gonna give you that. Okay, so you got

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the number. It is nine strikeouts to begin a game.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Nine strikeouts. This actually made me laugh, vapor, said Chris Davis.

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Not that type of strikeout. That is the best guess

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I've ever you know, I mean, that's actually making me laugh,

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like though it's building and building and building, it's making

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>me laugh. Nine strikeouts. You absolutely nail the number. Now

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the pitcher, does anybody have it? JP guess Corbin Burns.

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That is incorrect, Wonky, said Blake Snell. Oh man, that's

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>not right, man, that's not it. Oh Tawny is a guest, Kershaw.

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>These are all great guesses. It's gonna it's gonna be rough,

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rough for you guys to get it. I'll let you

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>sit on it and we'll do some stuff heroes, and

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back to it. The I'm gonna give you

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>one extra hint. It's an NL pitcher. It's a current

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>NL pitcher. So there's your other little hint that you get. Like,

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw would have been a great guest, But that's not it.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go through some stat heroes. Aristide is a Kenyell

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>three for four two homers three RBI whoa This is

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like our once or twice a year little gift we

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>get from a Kenyo until he goes back into his hole,

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 1>until winter comes back. So two homers, three RBI. Eric

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Hass five for five with a homer, David v r

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>two homers, going two for three with three RBI, Elloy

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Jimenez coming back into it with a homer. Ed Mundo Sosa,

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>He's We've mentioned his name a couple times over the

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>last week. He had a homer with three RBIs, Dalton

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Varshow had two bombs, Michael Tolia homer with four RBIs,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Max Munci, Johannio Swarez, and von grishapihanhe Swarrez two homers.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>He has been quite the quite the little productive offensive player.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And it makes me think back to the beginning of

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the year when I'm playing up his stats here, when

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayer had pulled up this weird, crazy thing in

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the first month that essentially said Johannel Swarez was more

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>valuable than Jose Ramirez. It was like Yahoo's Points League

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>algorithm or some nonsense. We're all laughing about it. But

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Swarez has put up twenty seven homers, but only

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a two thirty three batting average this year. You think

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Swarez is on the uptick for next year? Is a

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>guy we need to keep an eye on, or is

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that batting average still going to keep him down in

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the drudges.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's hard to say he's on the uptick.

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 3>He's thirty years old.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I think we know what kind of a player he

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 2>is at this point, and he has tons of power

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and he strikes out thirty percent of the time, So

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>he's going to hit for a low average. You know,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>back when he played in Cincinnati, I feel like that

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>was ideal for him, and he did have that forty

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>nine home run season back in twenty nineteen when everybody

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>was hitting a lot of home runs. But you know,

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 2>it's it's not quite as easy for him in Seattle.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>He's still big time power, but yeah, I mean the

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>warts are are very apparent with him.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Von Grisham continues to keep rolling grisome, if I say correctly,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>five homers, four stolen bases, three forty seven batting average,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>been playing some outfield, So as soon as Zzzie comes

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>back out, I don't think that bat is going anywhere

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. So feel really good about that on

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the pitching side, Jacob de Gram struck out eight to

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>over seven. That under eight and a half k prop

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>if it exists anywhere, has cashed. I think two of

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the last three times. Alec Manoah had five strikeouts in

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>eight innings, Chris Bassett struck out ten over seven, Garrett

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Cole struck out fourteen in six and two thirds, and

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Frielan had eight strikeouts in six innings in a

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>rare good Colorado performance. Now the correct name has been said,

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna give him credit. I'm going to assume

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't cheat here because maybe he just as a fan.

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Pabo Lopez was the answer to the trivia question. Pablo

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Lopez started off a game in twenty twenty one against

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the Braves with nine consecutive strikeouts. For whatever reason, that's

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>insanely impressive to me. That like that is something that

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>jumps out to me. And I don't know what, like

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>perfect innings, I don't know that just doesn't really like

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do it for me, but that number specifically just jumps

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>way way out to me, and I love that nine

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 1>straight consecutive.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Strike Yeah, there should be a name for that, because

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 2>we've got to strike out the side as a name,

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 2>So we need something for strike out the entire lineup consecutively.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, let's think about it.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I like that.

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I like where your head is going here. By the way, Wonky,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>you're right about this. You just realize we thought not

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>one single double digit number guy hit a homer, but

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Aristo esu Kenya, who's forty four, that was the one

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>guy yesterday that would have got the Wonky bonus if

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>someone would have picked. So just pointing that out. Stat

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>zero's Kyle Garlic went oh for seven with five strikeouts

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in the doubleheader. That's hard to do. Ronald guzmano for

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>five with four k's, Cody Thomas so for four with

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>four k's, and Tyler O'Neill oh for three with three k's.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty it's been a pretty copy and paste

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>line for him, kind of back to his old ways.

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>On the pitching side, Eric Lauer got lit up seven

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>runs and two and two thirds only two strikeouts. Tommy Henry,

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>my guy with the Diamondbacks, gave up five earned runs.

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>He started off pretty nice, but then it unveiled and

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he gave up like three or four homers.

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Four and one third. Ovioto had four and runs and

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>two innings just under two innings. Alex Cobb gave up

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>three earned runs but couldn't get out of the fifth,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Kopek did hit his k prop what we

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about yesterday, but he only went three and two

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>thirds with four earned runs, so no point home. So

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned the home run contest, no one really

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>got to take advantage of the double double home run calls.

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So just keep that in mind because the contest is

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>getting real close. I don't have an overlay for you.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It was not given one today. But friends, we have

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a tie at the top of the home run race

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>because Cat Fox got on the board yesterday with a

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>mic Trout homer and is now tied with d Blum.

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>We have two people at the top with forty nine

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>home runs. High Cuby has been at the top of

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this list like all freaking year, and he's down at

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>forty eight. L Scales at forty eight, go cards at

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. Mike Mayer and Joey still on the board unfortunately,

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but Dee Blum and Cat Fox at the top. They

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are racing this bad boy out to be the home

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>run King of leading off in Fantasy Pros. I want

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to remind you guys as well, speaking of all of

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this fun stuff, if you guys have enjoyed the podcast,

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure you subscribe, rate and review, and if you do,

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros in September is giving away the Austin Riley

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one signed World Series Ball. Just for subscribing,

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>rating and reviewing, one person's gonna win. So just think

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>of your odds. It's pretty good. It's all you gotta do.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And also like, give a like on the video side

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>here for all the video stuff. Bet MGM. Yes, it

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is time. Let's see if I can do this today.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how my hair is gonna look. The

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>hat hasn't really been working. So here, here we go,

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>there we go. I don't have my crown, but I

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>have my tiara to tell you guys all about our

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>friends over at bet MGM. Bet MGM. I looked like

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody that can say it's like fat wonder woman

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>with a beer.

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Some people are meant to be royalty and others aren't. Chris, Yeah,

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what to tell you.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I actually hate to tell you this. I'm

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>technically a lord. I did not many people know this,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but I have technically a lord. I have a little

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>plot of land in glen Coe wherever.

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 2>So if you're not incorporated this into your fantasy persona,

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 2>you could be the fantasy lord.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I well, I'm not really into the bits that everybody.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I have my own little bits, but I don't do

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, I'm not like Roto Lord whatever. But

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I am Lord Welsh technically.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 3>So you all, well, I had no idea you're hind

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I tell members, do know, listeners know that I

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>am a lord. So I have to wear my tiaura

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for you guys to tell you guys about bet MGM.

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Just to use promo code leading off. You guys want

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to go sign up. I actually just reloaded with some

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM and set up some bets for us in

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>football that's coming up this weekend of college football. Bogman

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and I did, and you guys can do it if

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you've never done before. Use a promo code leading off.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You get a one thousand dollars risk free bet. It's

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good deal. You're supporting the podcast, you're letting

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>them know that you listen into Leading off. Which is good,

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and you could we really I if I hear next

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>year doing this, I would want the promo code to

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>b Tiara. I really think it should be tr I

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>think everybody else agrees with me, but we'll do that.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Hair actually wasn't as bad as I thought it was

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be taking that off while wearing the hat.

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Bet MGM. That means we got some bets for you.

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So here are a couple I'm gonna throw at you

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>real quick. Andrew, you tell me what you like. Oliver

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on bettingpros dot com. Their prop cheat sheet always gives

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>us good information. And I take the top total basin

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>strikeout and the plus plays. Joyman SS is the number

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one play of the day, but it is Juice to

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Hell minus two fifteen on DK, but it is for

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one total base. They're projecting almost two, so you're gonna

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>have to parlay that with something. There's a plus money

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>play there. Number one is dermos Garcia, who just needs

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>one total base in the game, and it is plus

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>one oh five on DK, So if you wanted to

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>play the algorithm, you can maybe parla these parlay those

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>two together. On the pitching side, the number one K

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>prop is Josiah Gray, who is going up against Saint

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Louis only need four and a half they're projecting over five.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It's minus one oh eight on fan Duel, and then

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the plus money plays Kyle Gibson against the Marlins at

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>four and a half strikeouts, it's plus one twelve on

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Fan Tools. Anything out of those that you like, Andrew,

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>would you pick one?

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know you're saying it's really juice, but

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 2>that Joey Manessa's one. I mean, that's like a walk

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 2>in the park. Man He's gonna have that in the

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 2>first inning.

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think so too. Yeah, well, it's not

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a Tuesday, as we mentioned, so it might be a

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit tougher.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 3>But it might.

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>In my column at Fantasy Pros my Waiver Wire, when

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I first wrote about him like a month and a

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 2>half ago, when whenever he first started hitting, I called

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>him the nominee for the Frank Schwindell of twenty twenty

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 2>two award, and he is definitely earning that award. He

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 2>continues to rake I see no end in sight at

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 2>least until the end of this season.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>He actually might be one of the biggest surprises of

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. From absolute nobody, I mean, as a prospect person,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:58.959
<v Speaker 1>was not on any type of radar whatsoever. And then

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>hitting the way he gets is one of the bigger

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>surprises of this year. That has some pretty good impact

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for you on the back end here. So if you

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>want to, like I said, you gotta parlay that thing

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's you know, it's two to one against your money,

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so you got to put that with something and go

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and check it out. You know, there's also it's a

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>big strikeout prop day as well. You've got Dylan Cees,

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got Sandale Contry, you got Corbyn Burns if you

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like any of those. I believe the cease number is

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. And betting pros like the under

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Sandy's if I'm being honest with you

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>guys against Philly, I think it was only five and

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a half, So that would be one I would take.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe get Sandy and Manessas and you can put those

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>two together into a little two teamer and get some

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>bets going. So go and check it out over on

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the DFS side, Dylan Cee's ten to eight on FanDuel's

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Sandale Contra ten two, Corbyn Burns nine to eight, for

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the big dog pictures. I don't think there's a lot

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know. I mean, obviously you might want

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to pivot off of some of the lower pitchers, but

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big fan of a whole bunch of

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>them lineup builders for implied runs. No one was implied

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for over five today, but Milwaukee, Saint Louis, and the

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Cubs were all your top projected runs. So if you

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>guys want to build some stacks out of those, you

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>want to get some guys high in the lineup, Maybe

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a little sales Azuki or something. You could put those together.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And that leads us finally to the home run call

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Look at this, Mike Mayor just jumps

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on the list and took my same guy. Unbelievable Mayor

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>when he does this, but I love him. Though it's

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a BVB play. I'm going with Bryce Harper,

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as is Mike Mayor. But what does it matter. I

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't been hitting Homer, so I just need to write

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody's coattails. But me and may are going together. Walkee's

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>got Christian Yelich for the day, Andrew who you're gonna

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>go with? There's not a ton of ton of great

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>great options. Actually a lot of good pitching today. But

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>where are you gonna go for home run call?

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was gonna say.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I always picked Cardinals, and I this

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 2>like today, I have to pick a Cardinal really, as

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 2>long as I'm allowed to. The game started twenty minutes ago,

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 2>but I have not checked the stats yet. I just

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 2>you look at the slate today and you've got a

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 2>double header, So that's out. You've got a contra Sunny

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Gray Nester Cortez pitching. I don't really want to think

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 2>against those guys. Then the you know, the Cubs and

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the Reds and the Marlins don't hit any home runs really,

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 2>so I have to you notice I didn't pick Josiah

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Gray for that prop bet, I'm gonna pick the Cardinals too.

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I do a little bit of damage to Josiah Gray today,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>So give me Nolan Aeronado.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Since I've been taking Gould Schmid lately, I'll go with

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Aeronauto all right.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Nolan Aernado is the Marker and friends. That is it

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>for the show. That's it for the podcast, it's it

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for the live stream. We are back tomorrow. Chris Clig

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is in action Andrew anything going down, and they got

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of football stuff going on. Waiver Wire article.

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it dropping tomorrow?

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll be writing it tomorrow. It will be posted

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Saturday morning. So yeah, we're gonna keep keep that baseball

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 2>waiver Wire going strong right till the end of the season.

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Well perfect. Check them out on Twitter, Andrew underscore, Seipher,

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>check me out at is it the Welsh and friends

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>will be back again. Thank you guys so much for

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with us. Let's get those playoff championships. It's Andrew,

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it's Welsh, it's leading off. We're out. He's friends. Yeah,